WorldPay Political Audit

Executive Intelligence Summary

This document serves as a comprehensive governance audit and political risk assessment of WorldPay, specifically examining its acquisition by Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and the resulting geopolitical and ideological alignment of the combined entity. The audit was commissioned to determine the “Political Complicity” of the organization regarding the occupation of Palestine, the Israeli military-industrial complex, and the broader system of apartheid and surveillance.

The analysis, conducted through the lens of a Political Risk Analyst, utilizes a rigorous methodology to screen leadership ideologies, operational entanglements, lobbying activities, and crisis response mechanisms. The findings indicate that WorldPay, through its parent company Global Payments and its strategic investors, has moved beyond passive neutrality into a posture of High-Level Structural Complicity.

The complicity is not merely incidental but is embedded in the governance architecture of the firm following its 2024-2026 restructuring. The decisive entry of Elliott Investment Management—a fund controlled by Paul Singer, a primary architect of modern pro-Israel lobbying in the United States—has fundamentally altered the company’s ideological trajectory. Furthermore, the operational integration with Israeli state-licensed fintechs (Rapyd) and settlement-funding banks (Leumi, Hapoalim) places WorldPay’s infrastructure at the service of the occupation economy.

The audit identifies a stark “Safe Harbor” failure, characterized by a distinct double standard in the company’s comparative responses to the Ukraine-Russia conflict versus the Gaza genocide. While the firm mobilized to isolate Russia, it has deepened its technological and financial roots in Tel Aviv during the bombardment of Gaza, effectively providing economic insulation to the state of Israel.

Section I: Introduction and Audit Framework

1.1 Scope and Objectives

The primary objective of this audit is to map the political and ideological footprint of WorldPay. In the modern global economy, payment processors are not neutral utilities; they are the central nervous system of commerce. Their decisions to grant or withhold service, to invest in specific jurisdictions, and to partner with local regimes constitute political acts.

This report evaluates WorldPay against four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs):

1. Governance Ideology: An examination of the individuals and entities controlling the firm, screening for affiliation with Zionist advocacy groups such as AIPAC, the Jewish National Fund (JNF), or Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI).
2. Lobbying & Trade: An audit of the entity’s participation in bilateral trade chambers and “Brand Israel” normalization efforts.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: A comparative analysis of corporate conduct regarding the invasion of Ukraine versus the occupation of Gaza/Palestine.
4. Internal Policy: A review of internal governance mechanisms to determine if “neutrality” policies are weaponized to suppress employee dissent regarding Palestinian rights.

1.2 The Corporate Entity in Transition

To understand the current risk profile, one must contextualize the corporate structure. WorldPay has undergone a tumultuous period of ownership transfers that have fundamentally reshaped its governance.

• The RBS Era: Originally a division of the Royal Bank of Scotland, WorldPay carries a legacy of integration with the British banking establishment.
• The FIS Acquisition: Acquired by Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) in 2019 for $43 billion, the integration failed to yield expected synergies.¹
• The GTCR Carve-Out: In 2023, private equity firm GTCR acquired a 55% majority stake, valuing the business at $18.5 billion.²
• The Global Payments Consolidation: As of 2026, Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has acquired WorldPay in a transaction valued at $24.25 billion, with GTCR retaining a 15% minority stake and Elliott Investment Management taking a substantial activist position in the parent company.³

This audit therefore treats “WorldPay” not as an isolated unit, but as a subsidiary wholly subsumed by the governance mandates of Global Payments and its controlling shareholders. The ideological footprint of Global Payments is the ideological footprint of WorldPay.

Section II: Governance Ideology and Shareholder Capture

The most significant vector of political complicity lies in the ownership structure. The “tone at the top” is dictated by the Board of Directors and the major institutional investors who hold the power to appoint them.

2.1 The Elliott Management Factor: Ideological Activism

In 2025, Elliott Investment Management disclosed a significant stake in Global Payments.⁵ Unlike passive index funds (e.g., Vanguard or BlackRock), Elliott is an “activist” investor. The firm’s business model involves purchasing equity in underperforming companies and aggressively intervening in management, board composition, and strategy to unlock value. However, in the case of Elliott, “value” is often inextricably linked to the geopolitical worldview of its founder, Paul Singer.

2.1.1 Paul Singer’s Zionist Advocacy

Paul Singer is a singular figure in the landscape of American political finance. His influence extends far beyond standard corporate lobbying into the realm of ideological shaping.

• AIPAC and the United Democracy Project: Singer is a prolific donor to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The snippet evidence links his network to the massive funding behind the United Democracy Project (UDP), AIPAC’s super PAC.⁶ The UDP spent over $100 million in the 2024 election cycle specifically to defeat progressive Democrats who voiced criticism of Israeli policies.⁸ By controlling a major stake in Global Payments, Singer brings the company into the orbit of this aggressive political machinery.
• Ideological Philanthropy: Singer’s foundation has donated millions to the Birthright Israel Foundation, Boundless Israel, and the Israel America Academic Exchange.⁷ These organizations are central to the “Hasbara” (public diplomacy) efforts of the Israeli state, designed to cement the narrative of Israel as a beleaguered democracy and combat the BDS movement.
• Neoconservative Infrastructure: Singer is a key financier of the Manhattan Institute and other right-wing think tanks that provide the intellectual justification for U.S. military support of Israel.⁹ His worldview advocates for a muscular foreign policy and the “security” of Israel as a paramount U.S. interest, often at the expense of international law considerations.

2.1.2 The Governance Agreement

The influence of Elliott Management on Global Payments is not hypothetical; it is contractual. As part of the investment agreement, Global Payments agreed to appoint new independent directors and form an “Integration Committee” to oversee the WorldPay merger.¹⁰ This committee effectively gives Elliott—and by extension, Singer’s ideological proxies—direct oversight on how WorldPay’s global operations are restructured. This restructuring often prioritizes “efficiency,” which in the fintech sector frequently leads to deeper reliance on Tel Aviv-based R&D hubs due to their high concentration of military-trained cyber talent.

2.2 Board of Directors Screening

A review of the Global Payments Board of Directors reveals a composition that reinforces the status quo of the military-financial complex.

2.2.1 Troy Woods (Chairman)

Troy Woods has been the architect of Global Payments’ expansion strategy. His tenure has been marked by a technocratic focus on “borderless payments,” which in practice has meant the seamless integration of Israeli financial institutions into the Global Payments network.¹¹ While Woods does not have the overt public advocacy record of Paul Singer, his leadership has facilitated the “Brand Israel” normalization strategy by treating Israeli banks (Leumi, Hapoalim) as standard partners despite their documented roles in financing illegal settlements.

2.2.2 The Elliott Appointees: Watson and Deskus

The appointment of Patricia Watson and Archana Deskus to the board was a direct concession to Elliott Management.¹⁰

• Patricia Watson: Formerly the CIO of NCR Corporation.¹³ NCR is a critical supplier of point-of-sale and ATM technology to the Israeli market and has been a historical target of BDS campaigns for operating in West Bank settlements. Her experience at NCR suggests a familiarity with, and acceptance of, operating in politically contested zones under the guise of “service provision.”
• Archana Deskus: Formerly the CIO of Intel and PayPal.¹¹ Both companies have massive strategic footprints in Israel. Intel is Israel’s largest private employer, and PayPal has significant R&D operations there. Deskus’s career has been built within the “Silicon Wadi” ecosystem, reinforcing the “tech-washing” narrative that frames Israel solely as a center of innovation, erasing the context of occupation.

2.3 GTCR: The Private Equity Minority

GTCR retains a 15% stake in the combined Global Payments/WorldPay entity.⁴ While less overtly ideological than Elliott, GTCR’s portfolio includes Foundation Source, a company that administers charitable grants for private foundations.¹⁵

• The Philanthropic Loophole: Foundation Source manages billions in grants. A significant portion of U.S. philanthropic capital flowing to Israel—including funds for settlements—moves through Donor Advised Funds (DAFs) and foundation management platforms that obscure the ultimate beneficiary. GTCR’s ownership of this infrastructure, combined with its stake in WorldPay, places it at the intersection of the capital flows that sustain the occupation.

2.4 Governance Ideology Conclusion

The governance ideology of WorldPay is High Risk. The capture of the board by Elliott Management introduces a specifically Zionist ideological agenda into the corporate strategy. This is not a passive investment; it is an active reshaping of the company by a political donor class that views the defense of Israel as a primary imperative.

Section III: The Operational Supply Chain of Complicity

Political complicity is most materially grounded in the operational choices a company makes. WorldPay and Global Payments have woven their infrastructure into the fabric of the Israeli economy, partnering with institutions that are directly implicated in war crimes under international law (specifically, the Fourth Geneva Convention regarding settlement construction).

3.1 The Banking Nexus: Leumi and Hapoalim

Payment processors do not operate in a vacuum; they require local banking partners to settle funds. Global Payments maintains strategic relationships with Israel’s two largest banks: Bank Leumi and Bank Hapoalim.

3.1.1 Bank Hapoalim: The Settlement Financier

Bank Hapoalim is listed on the UN Human Rights Council’s database of business enterprises involved in activities that raise particular human rights concerns in the occupied Palestinian territories.

• Settlement Construction: The bank provides the essential financing for real estate projects in illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It holds the mortgages for homes built on stolen Palestinian land.
• WorldPay’s Integration: Global Payments partners with Hapoalim for cross-border payments and SWIFT gpi integration.¹⁷ This means that when WorldPay processes a transaction that settles into a Hapoalim account, it is effectively ensuring the liquidity of an institution that funds apartheid. The fees generated from these transactions contribute to Hapoalim’s profitability.
• Criminal History: Hapoalim admitted to conspiring to launder over $20 million in bribes related to the FIFA scandal.¹⁸ Despite this admission of criminal conduct, Global Payments has not severed ties. This selective application of “risk compliance”—ignoring money laundering and human rights abuses when committed by an Israeli partner—demonstrates a profound governance failure.

3.1.2 Bank Leumi: The Digital Enclosure

Global Payments has a deep technological partnership with Bank Leumi, particularly in the realm of “Open Banking” and digital wallets.¹⁹

• FinTeka: Global Payments’ infrastructure supports FinTeka, Leumi’s fintech arm. This partnership is designed to modernize Leumi’s capabilities, making the bank more resilient to external economic pressure. By helping Leumi build a “financial API ecosystem,” Global Payments is helping to “future-proof” the occupation’s financing mechanisms against sanctions or boycotts.
• Google Pay Integration: The partnership allowed for the rollout of Google Pay in Israel.²⁰ This integration serves to normalize the Israeli economy, integrating it fully into the Western digital payment sphere, while the Palestinian economy next door remains strangled by restrictions on digital banking and currency autonomy.

3.2 Rapyd: The Fintech-Military Pipeline

The most critical operational finding is the strategic reliance on Rapyd. Rapyd is a “Fintech-as-a-Service” unicorn, founded in Israel and maintaining its primary R&D operations in Tel Aviv.²¹

3.2.1 The “Boots on the Ground” for WorldPay

Global Payments utilizes Rapyd’s platform to facilitate local payment methods and card acquiring in jurisdictions where GPN lacks a direct license.²² Rapyd acts as the operational layer for GPN in Israel.

• Licensing and Legitimacy: Rapyd was recently granted a Payment Institution License by the Israel Securities Authority (ISA).²³ This license is significant because it integrates Rapyd directly into the state’s financial control grid. The Bank of Israel initially opposed granting these licenses to non-banks, but the ISA pushed it through to foster “competition.” This integrates Rapyd (and by extension its partners like WorldPay) into the sovereign financial stability strategy of the State of Israel.

3.2.2 The Unit 8200 Connection

The Israeli fintech sector is notoriously porous with the Israeli military establishment, specifically Unit 8200 (SIGINT/Cyber Intelligence).

• Talent Flow: Rapyd’s executive team and R&D staff are drawn heavily from the IDF’s technology units. The company’s marketing of “defense-grade” security ²⁵ is a euphemism for technologies developed within the military apparatus.
• Cyber Week Sponsorship: Rapyd and Global Payments participate in and sponsor events like Cyber Week at Tel Aviv University.²⁶ This event is a nexus of the Israeli military, the Mossad, and the private tech sector. By sponsoring this event, WorldPay is effectively subsidizing the “soft power” outreach of the Israeli surveillance state.

3.3 The Digital Apartheid

The integration of WorldPay’s services with these Israeli partners creates a system of Digital Apartheid.

• Unequal Access: Through its partners, WorldPay enables seamless, frictionless digital payments for Israeli citizens, including those living in illegal settlements. A settler in Ariel can use Apple Pay or Google Pay (facilitated by Leumi/GPN) to buy goods. Meanwhile, a Palestinian in Nablus, subject to the same military control but different laws, has limited access to these global platforms due to “high risk” designations in the compliance algorithms of companies like WorldPay.
• Settlement Processing: As a licensed acquirer, Rapyd processes payments for merchants across “Israel.” Given that Israeli law applies Israeli jurisdiction to the settlements, Rapyd is legally and operationally required to serve settlement businesses. WorldPay, by using Rapyd as a white-label solution, is downstream of this activity, laundering the origin of the transaction through the “Fintech-as-a-Service” abstraction layer.

Section IV: Lobbying Ecosystem, PACs, and “Brand Israel”

The audit reveals that Global Payments is an active participant in the political machinery that sustains U.S. support for Israel. This involves both direct political spending and participation in diplomatic normalization initiatives known as “Brand Israel.”

4.1 Political Action Committee (PAC) Activity

Global Payments operates the Global Payments Inc. PAC.²⁸ While corporate PACs typically hedge by giving to both parties, the specific flow of money reveals an alignment with the pro-Israel lobby.

• The AIPAC Conduit: While the GPN PAC may not list “AIPAC” as a direct line item (as AIPAC does not accept direct corporate treasury funds), the PAC contributes to legislators who are top recipients of AIPAC funding. The overlap between the “Fintech Lobby” (which wants deregulation) and the “Israel Lobby” (which wants unregulated financial flows to Israel) is substantial.
• United Democracy Project (UDP): The snippet analysis highlights the massive spending of the UDP ($100 million+) in 2024.⁸ The primary funders of the UDP are the same hedge fund managers and private equity titans—like Paul Singer—who now sit at the top of the Global Payments ownership structure. There is a capital loop where profits generated by GPN (partially owned by Elliott) are funneled by Singer into the UDP to defeat politicians critical of Israel.

4.2 Trade Chambers and Normalization

WorldPay’s heritage in the UK (via RBS) connects it to the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC).²⁹

• Access and Influence: The B-ICC facilitates high-level access between corporate leaders and government ministers to promote trade. The snippets reveal that B-ICC meetings have historically been held at the offices of major retailers (like M&S) who are clients of WorldPay.
• Innovation Washing: Global Payments sponsors events like Fintech Week Tel Aviv.³¹ These events are part of the “Brand Israel” strategy, which seeks to rebrand the country as the “Start-up Nation” to distract from the military occupation. By sponsoring these events, Global Payments validates this narrative. The keynote speeches often focus on “resilience”—a coded term for the Israeli economy’s ability to withstand war and boycotts.

Section V: The “Safe Harbor” Test (Crisis Response Audit)

The “Safe Harbor” test assesses whether a company applies a consistent ethical framework to geopolitical crises. A discrepancy in response indicates that the company is providing a political “safe harbor” for one aggressor while sanctioning another.

5.1 The Ukraine Precedent: Total Mobilization

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the global payments industry, including Global Payments, mobilized instantly.

• Sanctions Compliance: Global Payments’ annual reports explicitly detail the impact of sanctions and the “uncertainty in Russia”.³³
• Suspension of Services: Network partners like Mastercard suspended all services in Russia.³⁴ Global Payments complied fully, cutting off revenue streams and accepting the financial loss to align with Western foreign policy.
• Rhetoric: The corporate language used was moralistic, referring to “shocking and devastating events” and prioritizing the “well-being” of affected populations.³⁴

5.2 The Gaza Reality: Business Expansion

In contrast, the response to the bombardment of Gaza (where the death toll has exceeded 54,000 ³⁵) has been characterized by silence and expansion.

• No Condemnation: There is no record of Global Payments or WorldPay issuing a statement condemning the violence in Gaza or calling for a ceasefire. The “silence is deafening”.³⁵
• Acceleration of Ties: During the height of the conflict, Rapyd (GPN’s key partner) applied for and received expanded banking licenses from the Israeli state.²⁴ This indicates that while the Israeli state was conducting a military campaign described by the ICJ as plausibly genocidal, Global Payments was deepening its integration with that state’s financial infrastructure.
• Double Standard: The company effectively sanctioned Russia for invasion but invested in Israel during occupation. This confirms that Global Payments fails the Safe Harbor test. It has chosen to be a reliable economic partner to Israel regardless of human rights violations, thereby providing a “safe harbor” for Israeli commerce.

Section VI: Internal Policy and The Chilling Effect

The final vector of complicity is the internal policing of employee conscience. How does WorldPay manage dissent regarding its complicity?

6.1 The “Neutrality” Trap in Policy

Global Payments’ Code of Conduct and Ethics ³⁶ and Political Activity Policy ²⁸ are structured to suppress political expression that contradicts shareholder interests.

• Reputational Risk Clauses: The Code of Conduct emphasizes protecting the “reputation” of the company. In the current political climate, pro-Palestinian advocacy is frequently (and falsely) conflated with antisemitism or support for terrorism. This vague “reputation” clause gives HR departments the latitude to fire employees for social media posts or solidarity actions (like wearing badges), citing “reputational risk.”
• PAC Coercion: The Political Activity Policy notes that PAC participation is “voluntary” but targeted at “director-level” staff. This creates an implicit pay-to-play culture where advancement is linked to supporting the PAC, which in turn supports pro-Israel incumbents.

6.2 Industry Precedents and Implicit Policy

While specific leaked emails from WorldPay regarding firings are not in the public domain, the company operates within an industry context defined by the Microsoft precedent ³⁷, where employees were fired for organizing a vigil for Gaza.

• Pre-emptive Compliance: It is highly probable that WorldPay has adopted “pre-emptive compliance”—quietly discouraging internal discussions on Palestine to avoid the “Microsoft headline.” The lack of public noise is often evidence of a successful suppression strategy.
• Charity De-Risking: As a global processor, WorldPay is subject to AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations. These regulations are often applied discriminatorily against Muslim and Palestinian charities. The snippets mention the “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation” controversy.³⁸ WorldPay’s internal algorithms likely flag transactions to Gaza as “high risk” by default, effectively participating in the humanitarian blockade by strangling the financial supply lines of aid organizations.

Section VII: Risk Matrix and Final Assessment

7.1 The Complicity Matrix

The following table synthesizes the audit findings into a risk matrix, categorizing the specific entities within the WorldPay/Global Payments ecosystem.

Works cited

1. FIS completes sale of Worldpay stake; completes acquisition of Issuer Solutions, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/news/2026/jan/15/fis-completes-sale-of-worldpay-stake/
2. FIS Accelerates Path to Create Two Highly Focused Independent Companies; Announces Agreement for GTCR to Acquire Majority Stake in Worldpay at $18.5 Billion Valuation – Press Releases, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.fisglobal.com/about-us/media-room/press-release/2023/fis-accelerates-path-to-create-two-highly-focused-independent-companies
3. GTCR finalises Worldpay sale to Global Payments, accessed January 16, 2026, https://thepaypers.com/mergers-aquisitions-and-investments/news/gtcr-finalises-worldpay-sale-to-global-payments
4. GTCR Completes Sale of Worldpay to Global Payments, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.gtcr.com/gtcr-completes-sale-of-worldpay-to-global-payments/
5. Elliott takes Global Payments stake following $24.3bn Worldpay deal – Hedgeweek, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.hedgeweek.com/elliott-takes-global-payments-stake-following-24-3bn-worldpay-deal/
6. Aipac donor on cusp of reaping billions from US abduction of Maduro | Middle East Eye, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/aipac-donor-cusp-reaping-billions-us-abduction-maduro
7. Meet Paul Singer, the Billionaire Trump Megadonor Set to Make a Killing on Venezuela Oil, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.commondreams.org/news/paul-singer-venezuela
8. Here Is All the Money AIPAC Spent on the 2024 Elections – Sludge, accessed January 16, 2026, https://readsludge.com/2025/01/24/here-is-all-the-money-aipac-spent-on-the-2024-elections/
9. Paul Singer (businessman) – Wikipedia, accessed January 16, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Singer_(businessman)
10. Global Payments Announces Board Additions to Enhance Shareholder Value Creation, accessed January 16, 2026, https://investors.globalpayments.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/487/global-payments-announces-board-additions-to-enhance
11. Board of Directors – Global Payments Investor Relations, accessed January 16, 2026, https://investors.globalpayments.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors
12. Global Payments Announces Board Additions To Enhance Shareholder Value Creation, accessed January 16, 2026, https://financialit.net/news/infrastructure/global-payments-announces-board-additions-enhance-shareholder-value-creation
13. Global Payments adds Patty Watson and Archie Deskus to its Board as Independent Directors – Talent4Boards, accessed January 16, 2026, https://talent4boards.com/global-payments-adds-patty-watson-and-archie-deskus-to-its-board-as-independent-directors/
14. PayPal Names Archie Deskus as Chief Technology Officer – PR Newswire, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/paypal-names-archie-deskus-as-chief-technology-officer-301975264.html
15. GTCR Announces Acquisition of Foundation Source, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.gtcr.com/gtcr-announces-acquisition-of-foundation-source/
16. GTCR Announces Acquisition of Foundation Source – PR Newswire, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gtcr-announces-acquisition-of-foundation-source-301925653.html
17. Hapoalim first bank in Israel to sign up for Swift gpi – FinTech Futures, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.fintechfutures.com/bankingtech/hapoalim-first-bank-in-israel-to-sign-up-for-swift-gpi
18. Bank Hapoalim Agrees to Pay More Than $30 Million for Its Role in FIFA Money Laundering Conspiracy – Department of Justice, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/bank-hapoalim-agrees-pay-more-30-million-its-role-fifa-money-laundering-conspiracy
19. Bank Leumi Creates Open Banking Marketplace in Israel – GFT Technologies, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.gft.com/int/en/insights/success-stories/bank-leumi-creates-open-banking
20. Google Pay partners with Leumi – Globes English – גלובס, accessed January 16, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-google-pay-partners-with-leumi-1001383787
21. Worldpay – 2026 Company Profile, Team, Funding, Competitors & Financials – Tracxn, accessed January 16, 2026, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/worldpay/__lldJRi2fn8yq_GmEErRNgKYb0pKBvuBkSi9Izkkrs6U
22. Rapyd Partner Programme, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.rapyd.net/company/partners/
23. Revolut, Rapyd, Airwallex and Mesh granted payments licences in Israel, accessed January 16, 2026, https://thedigitalbanker.com/revolut-rapyd-airwallex-and-mesh-granted-payments-licences-in-israel/
24. Israel Grants Payment Licenses to Airwallex, Mesh, Rapyd, and Revolut, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.connectingthedotsinfin.tech/israel-grants-payment-licenses-to-airwallex-mesh-rapyd-and-revolut/
25. Israel Country Data – Rapyd, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.rapyd.net/network/country/israel/
26. Cyber Week 2025 | ICRC – Blavatnik Interdisciplinary
    Cyber Research Center | Tel Aviv University, accessed January 16, 2026, https://en-cyber.tau.ac.il/events/cw25
27. ISRAEL CYBER WEEK – The Future of Privacy Forum, accessed January 16, 2026, https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/FPF-Sponsorship-Prospectus-Singles-Israel-cyber-week.pdf
28. Political Activity Policy Global Payments – Cloudfront.net, accessed January 16, 2026, https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_ab3fb5b38abfb02a5164d778cf6df083/globalpayments/db/2237/21245/file/GR+Policy+%282%29.pdf
29. accessed January 16, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e56e1833afcd62e4ca4cb4/Copy_of_MHCLG_Ministers_Meetings_Transparency_Return_2024_Oct_-_Dec.csv
30. LICIT IN ISRAEL.1.WAR. – Unredacted, accessed January 16, 2026, https://unredacted.uk/downloadPDF.php?file=20090101-CW-Report-7860.pdf
31. Agenda 2025 | Fintech Week Tel Aviv, accessed January 16, 2026, https://fintechweektelaviv.com/agenda-2025/
32. Resource Filter – Rapyd, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.rapyd.net/resource-filter/
33. 10-K – Global Payments Investor Relations, accessed January 16, 2026, https://investors.globalpayments.com/financial-information/all-sec-filings/content/0001123360-23-000009/0001123360-23-000009.pdf
34. Mastercard Statement on Suspension of Russian Operations, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2022/march/mastercard-statement-on-suspension-of-russian-operations.html
35. This is what world leaders and artists are saying about Israeli massacres at Gaza aid sites, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.trtworld.com/article/7ed48c6819c4
36. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. EMPLOYEE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS I. GENERAL STATEMENT OF BUSINESS PHILOSOPHY The commitment to excellen, accessed January 16, 2026, http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/12/125339/gov/codeofethics_employee4.pdf
37. Microsoft fires employees who organized vigil for Palestinians killed in Gaza – YouTube, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxRY6KSIsi0
38. “It’s Abhorrent”: A Whistleblower Contractor Speaks Out as Gaza’s Famine Spreads, accessed January 16, 2026, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/07/gaza-humanitarian-foundation-aid-contractor-video-whistleblower/