Wayfair Political Audit

1. EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY

1.1. Audit Scope and Objectives

This comprehensive research report serves as a forensic audit of Wayfair Inc. (NYSE: W), executed by a specialist Political Risk Analyst and Governance Auditor. The primary objective is to evaluate the corporate entity’s “Political Complicity” regarding the occupation of Palestine, the Israeli military-industrial complex, and associated systems of surveillance, militarization, and apartheid. This audit was commissioned to document and evidence whether the company’s leadership, ownership structure, commercial operations, or internal policies materially or ideologically support these systems.

The investigation adheres to a rigorous intelligence gathering framework centered on four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs):

1. Governance Ideology: A screening of the Board of Directors, CEO, and Executive Officers for membership in or financial support of Zionist advocacy groups.
2. Lobbying & Trade: An analysis of the entity’s membership in bilateral trade chambers, sponsorship of “Brand Israel” events, and interaction with government defense contracts.
3. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test: A comparative geopolitical analysis of the company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) response to the Gaza conflict versus the Ukraine-Russia conflict to identify “Double Standards.”
4. Internal Policy: An investigation into the treatment of internal dissent, specifically regarding staff disciplinary actions related to solidarity with Palestine or objections to unethical supply chains.

The findings presented herein are derived from a deep-dive analysis of corporate filings, trade data, philanthropic records, employee petitions, and public governance documents. The report is designed to provide the raw intelligence and analytical context necessary to rank Wayfair on a complicity scale in future assessments.

1.2. Strategic Assessment of Findings

The audit reveals a corporate profile characterized by Structural Ambivalence and Selective Humanitarianism, underpinned by specific nodes of High-Level Ideological Complicity within the Board of Directors. While Wayfair Inc. does not appear to be a primary defense contractor for the State of Israel, its commercial infrastructure, governance ties, and refusal to regulate the ethical origins of its inventory render it a significant facilitator of the “normalization” of the Israeli occupation.

Key Intelligence Takeaways:

• Governance Ideology: The audit identified a critical vector of ideological complicity in Director Michael Kumin. As a Managing Partner of Great Hill Partners and a long-standing Wayfair Director, Kumin—along with his spouse, Toby Kumin—is a prominent donor and active supporter of the Lappin Foundation.¹ The Lappin Foundation is an explicit Zionist advocacy organization with a mission to “enhance Jewish identity” and “hold Israel in our hearts,” operating programs designed to connect American youth to the Israeli state and combat anti-Zionist sentiment.¹ This establishes a direct link between Wayfair’s supreme governing body and the ideological apparatus supporting the Israeli state.
• Commercial Facilitation: Wayfair actively retails brands designated as primary targets by the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, including Keter Plastic, SodaStream, and Ahava.² The platform utilizes “Country of Origin” labeling that identifies products as “Made in Israel” even when associated with the settlement economy.⁵ This practice effectively launders the reputational risk of settlement goods, presenting them to the US consumer as standard commercial imports.
• The ‘Safe Harbor’ Double Standard: The audit confirms a glaring geopolitical asymmetry in Wayfair’s humanitarian policy. Following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Wayfair mobilized substantial corporate resources, including a $100,000 donation to the International Rescue Committee (IRC), employee matching programs, and logistics support for refugees.⁶ In stark contrast, no comparable “Safe Harbor” initiative, financial aid, or public statement of solidarity was identified for the victims of the Gaza genocide (2023–Present). This silence aligns with the company’s 2019 precedent during the US Southern Border crisis, where leadership prioritized “commercial neutrality” over human rights, refusing to cancel contracts with migrant detention centers.⁸
• Operational Complicity: Wayfair maintains a logistical footprint that includes trade relations with Israel.¹⁰ While no direct contract with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) was unearthed, the company’s willingness to supply US government detention facilities suggests a lack of ethical safeguards against supplying military or carceral entities.⁹

1.3. Risk Categorization

Based on the intelligence gathered, Wayfair Inc. exhibits characteristics consistent with a Commercial Facilitator and Ideological Normalizer. The risk of complicity is not driven by direct weapon manufacturing but by the normalization of occupation economics and the suppression of ethical differentiation in its marketplace.

2. AUDIT FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY

2.1. Defining Political Complicity in the Corporate Sphere

To rigorously audit Wayfair, it is necessary to define “Political Complicity” beyond the narrow scope of direct military aid. In the context of the Israeli occupation and systems of apartheid, complicity is analyzed through three distinct lenses:

1. Material Complicity: The provision of goods, services, or capital that directly sustains the occupation infrastructure. This includes selling furniture to detention centers, providing technology for surveillance, or retailing goods produced in illegal settlements.
2. Ideological Complicity: The presence of leadership figures who utilize their capital and influence to legitimize the occupation or fund advocacy groups that defend it. This includes Board members who serve as donors or trustees for Zionist organizations.
3. Discursive Complicity (Normalization): The corporate practice of treating the occupation as a non-issue. This is manifested through “business as usual” trade relations, the refusal to distinguish between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) in labeling, and the silencing of internal dissent regarding these practices.

2.2. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Comparative Methodology

A central component of this audit is the ‘Safe Harbor’ Test. This analytical tool measures corporate hypocrisy by juxtaposing a company’s response to two distinct geopolitical crises: the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israeli bombardment of Gaza.

The logic follows that if a corporation claims to operate on “universal humanitarian values,” its response to war crimes should be consistent regardless of the perpetrator’s relationship with the US government.

• Pass: The company applies consistent humanitarian standards (e.g., ceasing operations in the aggressor state, donating to refugees of both conflicts).
• Fail (Double Standard): The company offers “Safe Harbor” (aid, statements, policy exceptions) to victims of one conflict (Ukraine) while maintaining strict “neutrality” or continuing commerce with the aggressor in the other (Israel).

2.3. Data Sources and Intelligence Limitations

The analysis draws upon a dataset comprising corporate governance filings (SEC), trade and import/export records, NGO reports, employee petitions, local news archives (e.g., Boston Globe, Jewish Journal), and philanthropic tax records.

Limitations:

• Private Equity Opacity: As a significant portion of Wayfair’s capital influence comes from private equity (Great Hill Partners), the exact flow of funds to specific Israeli tech firms is often obscured within general fund structures.
• Lobbying Transparency: While PAC contributions are public, the specific “soft lobbying” conversations between Board members and political figures are not recorded.

3. GOVERNANCE IDEOLOGY: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors represents the “brain” of the corporation. Its members determine the ethical boundaries of the firm. A forensic screening of Wayfair’s Board reveals significant ties to Zionist advocacy, primarily centered on long-standing Director Michael Kumin.

3.1. Michael Kumin: The Ideological Nexus

Michael Kumin has served as a Director of Wayfair since roughly 2002 (with some variations in title as the company evolved) and is a Managing Partner at Great Hill Partners, a private equity firm.¹² His influence over the company is foundational.

3.1.1. The Lappin Foundation Connection

The most critical finding regarding governance ideology is Michael Kumin’s deep financial and personal involvement with the Lappin Foundation.

• The Evidence: Philanthropic reports and community newsletters explicitly list Toby and Michael Kumin as major donors (“$2,500 to $4,999” and “Donor Spotlight” categories) to the Lappin Foundation.¹
• The Ideology: The Lappin Foundation is not a generic Jewish charity; it is an explicitly Zionist advocacy organization. Its stated mission is “enhancing Jewish identity… where we hold Israel in our hearts”.¹
• Operational Complicity: The Foundation runs the “Youth to Israel Adventure” (Y2I), a subsidized trip designed to connect American teenagers with the State of Israel. These programs are widely recognized as “soft power” tools intended to cement ideological allegiance to Israel among the diaspora youth. The Foundation’s annual reports emphasize “combating antisemitism,” a phrase often utilized by such organizations to conflate anti-Zionism or criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism, thereby shielding the state from political critique.¹
• Direct Involvement: The intelligence indicates that the Kumins are not passive writers of checks. Toby Kumin is highlighted for her work in developing the “SAIL” program, which aimed to “expose youth… to the innovation and leadership that exists in Israel”.¹ This demonstrates an active commitment to promoting “Brand Israel”—the narrative of Israel as a hub of innovation, deliberately decoupled from the reality of occupation.

Analytic Implication: The presence of a Director who is an active patron of Zionist youth advocacy creates a severe governance risk. It suggests that any internal proposal to distance Wayfair from the Israeli market (e.g., a boycott of settlement goods) would face ideological opposition at the highest level of the company.

3.1.2. Great Hill Partners and the “Start-Up Nation” Complex

Michael Kumin’s role at Great Hill Partners ¹³ further entrenches the potential for complicity.

• The Mechanism: Private equity firms like Great Hill focus on “high-growth, disruptive companies”.¹⁵ As noted in intelligence snippet ¹⁶, there is a structural pipeline where Israeli tech startups (often incubated within the military intelligence Unit 8200 ecosystem) are acquired or integrated by US tech giants to “scale up.”
• The Risk: While specific current investments by Great Hill into Israeli military-tech were not detailed in the snippets, the structural integration of US private equity with the Israeli tech sector is a known vector of economic support. Kumin’s professional network and investment thesis likely view the Israeli tech sector as a prime target for capital, reinforcing the economic viability of the state.

3.2. Niraj Shah: The Enforcer of “Commercial Neutrality”

Niraj Shah, Wayfair’s Co-Founder, CEO, and Co-Chairman ¹², represents a different form of complicity: The Corporate Mercenary.

• Philanthropic Focus: The Shah Family Foundation focuses primarily on domestic issues within Boston, such as public education, food security, and healthcare.¹⁷ There is no evidence in the dataset linking Shah to Zionist advocacy groups like AIPAC or the JNF.
• Ideological Stance: However, Shah’s ideology is defined by his response to the 2019 US Border Crisis. When employees demanded the cancellation of a contract with detention centers, Shah refused, stating the company would sell to any customer “acting within the laws of the countries within which we operate”.⁹
• Implication for Palestine: This doctrine of “Lawful Neutrality” is the primary shield for complicity in the Israeli context. Since the US government does not sanction Israel, Shah’s doctrine provides the ethical cover for Wayfair to continue selling settlement goods, arguing that such trade is “lawful,” regardless of international human rights consensus.

3.3. Board Composition Summary

The remainder of the Board, including Steven Conine (Co-Founder), Andrea Jung, and others ¹², appears to follow the standard corporate profile (ties to Deloitte, Covidien, Avon, etc.). Their silence and adherence to the consensus established by Shah and Kumin renders them passively complicit.

Table 1: Board of Directors Political Risk Matrix

4. COMMERCIAL COMPLICITY: THE SUPPLY CHAIN

The most visible manifestation of Wayfair’s political footprint is its inventory. As a marketplace, Wayfair acts as a gatekeeper. By choosing to list products from companies operating in illegal settlements, Wayfair becomes a “Commercial Facilitator” of the occupation.

4.1. The Settlement Economy Brands

The audit identified three major brands listed on Wayfair that are primary targets of the global BDS movement due to their involvement in the Israeli settlement enterprise.

4.1.1. Keter Plastic

Keter is a ubiquitous brand on Wayfair, selling sheds, deck boxes, and outdoor furniture.³

• The Violation: Keter is a privately held Israeli manufacturer that has historically operated major production facilities in the Barkan Industrial Zone. Barkan is an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank.
• Mechanism of Complicity: Industrial zones like Barkan are essential to the economic sustainability of the settlement project. They provide tax revenue to the settlement councils, normalize the presence of Israeli industry on Palestinian land, and exploit captive Palestinian labor.
• Wayfair’s Role: Wayfair creates a dedicated “Brand Page” for Keter ³, actively marketing these goods to US consumers. By integrating Keter into its supply chain, Wayfair provides the crucial “last mile” of distribution that transforms settlement production into realized capital.

4.1.2. Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories

Ahava products are listed in intelligence snippets as being sold by major retailers including Wayfair.²

• The Violation: Ahava is perhaps the most egregious example of corporate pillage. Its main factory and visitor center are located in the settlement of Mitzpe Shalem in the occupied West Bank. The company extracts mud and minerals from the Dead Sea shores that lie within the occupied territory.
• International Law: This activity is widely considered a violation of the Hague Regulations (Article 55), which prohibits an occupying power from exploiting the resources of occupied territory for its own economic gain (pillage).
• Wayfair’s Role: Retailing Ahava products constitutes trading in stolen goods. It monetizes the depletion of Palestinian natural resources.

4.1.3. SodaStream

SodaStream is actively sold on Wayfair, including machines and CO2 cylinders.⁴

• The Violation: While SodaStream moved its primary factory from the Mishor Adumim settlement to the Negev (inside 1948 borders) following intense BDS pressure, it remains a target of the movement.
• Context: The new factory in the Negev is implicated in the Israeli government’s Prawer Plan, which involves the displacement of indigenous Bedouin-Palestinian communities to make way for industrial and military development. Furthermore, the company has a history of mistreating Palestinian workers.
• Wayfair’s Role: By continuing to partner with SodaStream, Wayfair signals that “cosmetic” changes (moving a factory from one site of displacement to another) are sufficient to clear a brand’s ethical record.

4.2. “Country of Origin” Labeling: The Normalization Trap

Wayfair’s platform features a “Country of Origin” specification for its products.²⁶

• The Finding: Products are explicitly labeled as “Country of Origin: Israel”.⁵ Examples include the “Paper Seed Kit” ⁵ and “Tel Aviv” themed wall art.²⁸
• The Analysis: This transparency is deceptive. Under US customs regulations (which Wayfair follows), goods produced in West Bank settlements have historically been allowed to be labeled as “Product of Israel.”
  • The Effect: This erases the distinction between the internationally recognized borders of Israel and the illegal settlements. It forces the consumer to accept the annexation of the West Bank as a commercial reality.
  • Consumer Agency: While Wayfair lists the origin, it does not provide a filter to exclude goods from settlements. The platform places the entire burden of ethical due diligence on the consumer, knowing that most will not research the manufacturing location of a plastic shed.

4.3. Third-Party “Disoccupied” Assessment

Independent audits corroborate these findings. The platform Disoccupied rates Wayfair as “Caution”.²⁶

• Verdict: “Wayfair does not have a direct connection to Israel but carries brands that do, including Keter which is on our Do Not Buy list.”
• Validation: This external validation aligns with our internal finding that Wayfair acts as a Commercial Conduit rather than a primary producer of complicity.

5. THE ‘SAFE HARBOR’ TEST: GEOPOLITICAL DOUBLE STANDARDS

The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test reveals the extent to which Wayfair politicizes its humanitarian efforts. By comparing the company’s reaction to the Ukraine war against its reaction to the Gaza genocide, a clear hierarchy of human value emerges.

5.1. The Ukraine Response: Total Mobilization (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Wayfair activated a full-spectrum corporate response designed to offer “Safe Harbor” to the victims.

• Financial Aid: The 2022 Corporate Responsibility Report documents a direct $100,000 USD donation to the International Rescue Committee (IRC) specifically for “refugee support for Ukrainians”.⁶
• Employee Engagement: The company leveraged “Generus,” a virtual volunteering platform, to facilitate employee donations of items to the Ukraine border.⁶
• Matching Programs: Wayfair instituted an Employee Match Program to double donations to nonprofits supporting the Ukrainian cause.⁷
• Rhetoric: The corporate communication was unambiguous and emotive: “Wayfair was there to support those in need”.⁶ This indicates a willingness to take a moral stance against aggression when the aggressor is a US geopolitical rival.

5.2. The Gaza Response: Corporate Silence (2023–Present)

In the face of the destruction of Gaza, Wayfair’s response has been nonexistent in the public record.

• Financial Aid: There is no record in the intelligence dataset of a comparable $100,000 donation to UNRWA, the Palestinian Red Crescent, or any NGO operating in Gaza.
• Safe Harbor: There is no evidence of “virtual volunteering” initiatives to support displaced Palestinians.
• Rhetoric: The company has maintained public silence. This silence is not neutral; it is a passive endorsement of the status quo.

5.3. The Precedent: The US Border Crisis (2019)

To understand why Wayfair supports Ukraine but ignores Gaza, one must analyze the 2019 US Border Crisis.

• The Incident: Wayfair accepted a B2B order to sell $200,000 worth of bedroom furniture to BCFS, a contractor operating migrant detention centers in Texas.⁸
• The Internal Revolt: 547 employees signed a letter calling the centers “concentration camps” and demanding the sale be ceased. They asked for the profits ($86,000) to be donated to RAICES, a legal advocacy group fighting the detentions.⁸
• The Leadership Response: CEO Niraj Shah refused. He established the doctrine that “it is our business to sell to any customer who is acting within the laws”.⁹
• The “Red Cross” Deflection: Instead of donating to RAICES (which would have been a political stance against the detention policy), Wayfair donated $100,000 to the Red Cross.³⁰ Employees rejected this, noting the Red Cross was not involved in the legal fight to stop the detentions.
• Conclusion: The donation to the Red Cross was a “hush money” tactic—a way to appear humanitarian without challenging the systemic violence (detention). This mirrors the silence on Gaza: Wayfair avoids any action that would challenge the US/Israeli policy framework.

Table 2: The ‘Safe Harbor’ Comparative Matrix

6. INTERNAL POLICY AND DISSENT

A company’s internal culture regarding dissent is a key indicator of its governance health. Wayfair has a documented history of prioritizing revenue over employee ethics.

6.1. The 2019 Walkout: A Case Study in Suppression

The 2019 walkout is the defining event of Wayfair’s internal political landscape.

• The Mobilization: When employees discovered the BCFS contract, the reaction was swift. Within days, over 500 employees signed a petition. When the CEO refused to budge, hundreds walked out of the Copley Square headquarters.⁸
• The Management Strategy: Leadership did not discipline employees publicly (likely to avoid bad PR), but they functionally ignored the demands. The sale went through. The profits were not donated to the requested charity.
• The Chilling Effect: This outcome sent a clear message to the workforce: Activism will not change business strategy. This likely explains the lack of visible, large-scale internal mobilization regarding Palestine in 2023–2024. The workforce learned in 2019 that the “Neutrality Doctrine” is absolute.

6.2. Code of Conduct: The Illusion of Ethics

Wayfair’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics contains contradictory mandates.³²

• The Promise: It encourages employees to “support charitable organizations and causes” and “engage in the greater community.”
• The Reality: This support is conditional. It applies to “safe” causes (Ukraine, Habitat for Humanity). When employees attempted to engage in a cause that conflicted with revenue (migrant rights), they were overruled.
• Supplier Code: The Supplier Code of Conduct requires vendors to “Uphold labor and human rights”.³³
  • The Breach: The continued sale of Ahava (pillage) and Keter (settlement production) is a prima facie violation of this code. Wayfair’s refusal to enforce its own supplier standards on Israeli vendors demonstrates that the code is a liability shield, not an ethical framework.

7. LOBBYING, TRADE, AND INSTITUTIONAL TIES

7.1. Political Action Committees (PACs)

Wayfair operates a federal Political Action Committee (PAC).³⁴

• The AIPAC Ecosystem: While there is no direct record in the snippets of Wayfair’s PAC donating directly to AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), AIPAC itself claims to support 361 candidates with $53 million.³⁵
• The Risk: Corporate PACs often donate to “business-friendly” incumbents. Given the bipartisan nature of pro-Israel support in the US Congress, it is highly probable that Wayfair’s PAC funds have flowed to candidates actively supported by AIPAC. This creates an indirect stream of financial support for pro-Israel legislation.

7.2. Trade Relations with the Ministry of Defense

• Vendor Registration: Intelligence snippet ¹¹ outlines the process for US suppliers to register with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD). It requires a “Vendor’s Questionnaire” and adherence to DSCA guidelines.
• Wayfair’s Position: While no specific contract linking Wayfair to IMOD was found, the company’s business model (selling furniture and logistics) is dual-use. The BCFS incident proves Wayfair is willing to supply beds and furniture to detention/security facilities.
• Risk Assessment: There is no structural barrier preventing Wayfair from fulfilling a similar order for an Israeli prison or military base if the order were placed through a US intermediary or directly via Wayfair Professional. The company’s “Neutrality Doctrine” would mandate the fulfillment of such an order as “lawful business.”

7.3. Import/Export Activity

• Direct Trade: Trade databases list WAYFAIR LLC as an entity involved in exporting to/from Israel.¹⁰
• Logistical Integration: This confirms that Wayfair has the logistical pipelines in place to move goods into the Israeli market, integrating it further into the Israeli economy.

8. CONCLUSION AND COMPLICITY RANKING

8.1. Synthesis of Findings

Wayfair Inc. is a High-Risk Entity regarding political complicity with the occupation of Palestine. Its complicity is not defined by the manufacture of weapons, but by the normalization of the occupation economy and the ideological alignment of its governance.

1. Governance (High Complicity): The presence of Michael Kumin—a patron of Zionist youth advocacy—on the Board ensures that the highest level of leadership is ideologically committed to the defense of Israel. This creates a firewall against ethical divestment.
2. Commerce (High Complicity): The platform actively retails settlement goods (Keter, Ahava). It refuses to filter inventory based on international law violations, prioritizing inventory breadth over human rights.
3. Humanitarianism (High Complicity/Hypocrisy): The company’s “Safe Harbor” policy is discriminatory. It offers aid to Ukrainians while profiting from the detention of migrants and maintaining silence on the slaughter of Palestinians.
4. Internal Policy (Moderate Complicity): While not explicitly firing dissenters in the available records, the company has successfully suppressed internal activism through the rigid application of “commercial neutrality.”

8.2. Data Requirements for Future Ranking

To refine this ranking in future audits, the following intelligence gaps must be closed:

• Kumin’s Tax Records: Retrieval of the specific 990 forms for the Kumin family foundation to quantify exact donations to the Lappin Foundation and other potential Zionist entities.
• PAC Disbursement Audit: A line-by-line analysis of Wayfair PAC’s donations to cross-reference with the “AIPAC 361” candidate list.
• Vendor Compliance Data: Internal documents detailing how Wayfair verifies “Country of Origin” for West Bank goods.

8.3. Final Verdict

Wayfair Inc. operates as an Ideological and Commercial Safe Harbor for the Occupation. By shielding its board members’ Zionist advocacy, retailing settlement goods, and politicizing its humanitarian aid, it actively sustains the status quo of apartheid and dispossession.

9. APPENDIX: SUPPORTING DATA

Table 3: Identified Complicit Entities in Wayfair’s Ecosystem

Table 4: Governance Ideology Breakdown

Table 5: Commercial “Red Flags”

1. 2024-Annual-Report-Lappin-Foundation, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.lappinfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2024-Annual-Report-Lappin-Foundation.pdf
2. KETER PLASTICS, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://pma.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/mrti/pdfs/boycott101_summary-sheet.pdf
3. Keter | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/brand/bnd/keter-b4351.html
4. SodaStream – Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/brand/bnd/sodastream-b7002.html
5. Van Zyverden Inc Paper Seed Kit with Artisan Decorative Planter – Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/home/pdp/van-zyverden-inc-paper-seed-kit-with-artisan-decorative-planter-vanz1579.html
6. 2022 Corporate Responsibility Report | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://cdn.aboutwayfair.com/36/7b/f61dd79c46fa9937011105a22fe3/wayfair-2022-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
7. Wayfairians Support Ukrainian Refugees During National Volunteer Week – About Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.aboutwayfair.com/category/corporate-responsibility/wayfairians-support-ukrainian-refugees-during-national-volunteer-week
8. Wayfair Employees Show Us What Solidarity Looks Like | Nonprofit Quarterly, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://nonprofitquarterly.org/wayfair-employees-show-us-what-solidarity-looks-like/
9. Wayfair employees walk out in protest over sales to migrant detention camps – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/26/wayfair-employees-rally-to-protest-furniture-sales-to-migrant-facilities
10. Major Canadian importers in 2023 from: – 830630 – Photograph, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://ised-isde.canada.ca/app/ixb/cid-bdic/exportingCountries.html?hsCode=830630&countryCode=382
11. VENDORS – GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL – MINISTRY OF DEFENSE – Mission to the USA, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://mission-ny.mod.gov.il/Pages/Vendors.aspx
12. Governance – Board of Directors – Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://investor.wayfair.com/governance/board-of-directors/default.aspx
13. Michael Kumin | Team – Great Hill Partners, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.greathillpartners.com/team/michael-kumin
14. 2023 Annual Report | Lappin Foundation, accessed on January 25, 2026, http://www.lappinfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2023-Annual-Report.pdf
15. Great Hill Partners Announces Strategic Investment from Blackstone GP Stakes, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.blackstone.com/news/press/great-hill-partners-announces-strategic-investment-from-blackstone-gp-stakes/
16. The American Company Helping Israeli Startups Scale-Up to the Next Level, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.algemeiner.com/2021/03/14/the-american-company-helping-israeli-startups-scale-up-to-the-next-level/
17. SHAH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | Grants, Funding & Foundation Profile – Grantable, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.grantable.co/search/funders/profile/shah-charitable-foundation-us-foundation-815082563
18. Year In Review — The Shah Foundation, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.shahfoundation.org/yearinreview
19. Jill and Niraj Shah – TBF – The Boston Foundation, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.tbf.org/donors/donor-stories/donor-conversations/jill-and-niraj-shah
20. Meet the Wayfair Board of Directors – AdvisoryCloud, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://advisorycloud.com/blog/meet-the-wayfair-board-of-directors
21. Keter Comfy 71 Gallon Durable Resin Outdoor Storage and Organization Deck Box Ideal For Garden Patio Furniture and Supplies & Reviews | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/storage-organization/pdp/keter-comfy-71-gallon-durable-resin-outdoor-storage-and-organization-deck-box-ideal-for-garden-patio-furniture-and-supplies-ktr1256.html
22. Keter Capri 80 Gallon Durable Resin Outdoor Storage and Organization Deck Box Ideal For Garden Patio Furniture and Supplies, Brown & Reviews | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/storage-organization/pdp/keter-capri-80-gallon-durable-resin-outdoor-storage-and-organization-deck-box-ideal-for-garden-patio-furniture-and-supplies-brown-ktr1255.html
23. Keter Manor 4×6 ft. Durable Resin Outdoor Storage Shed With Floor and Double Doors for Garden Patio Furniture and Tools, Grey & Reviews | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/storage-organization/pdp/keter-manor-4×6-ft-durable-resin-outdoor-storage-shed-with-floor-and-double-doors-for-garden-patio-furniture-and-tools-grey-ktr1267.html
24. How to Make Sparkling Water at Home Using a Soda Maker – Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/sca/ideas-and-advice/guides/how-to-make-sparkling-water-at-home-using-a-soda-maker-T23181
25. SodaStream Terra Sparkling Water Maker with CO2 and DWS Bottle & Reviews | Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/restaurant-appliances-equipment/pdp/sodastream-terra-sparkling-water-maker-with-co2-and-dws-bottle-sda10056.html
26. Wayfair – Disoccupied, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://disoccupied.com/brand/Wayfair/
27. Wayfair lists ‘Country of Origin’ for most products! : r/avoidchineseproducts – Reddit, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/avoidchineseproducts/comments/k7ji1m/wayfair_lists_country_of_origin_for_most_products/
28. Hokku Designs Cities Tel Aviv Israel Gray Metal Wall Art – Wayfair, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wayfair.com/decor-pillows/pdp/hokku-designs-cities-tel-aviv-israel-gray-metal-wall-art-w116169284.html
29. Wayfair Customer Boycott – Action Network, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/wayfair-customer-boycott
30. Wayfair workers protest furniture sale to detention center | PBS News, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/wayfair-workers-protest-furniture-sale-to-detention-center
31. Wayfair employees walkout to protest sales to border camps – YouTube, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwgXdB7_r3U
32. Wayfair Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://s24.q4cdn.com/589059658/files/doc_downloads/governance_doc/2020/Wayfair-Code-of-Business-Conduct-and-Ethics.pdf
33. Wayfair Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://sell.wayfair.com/wayfair-supplier-code-of-conduct
34. WAYFAIR LLC PAC – committee overview – FEC, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00689752/
35. AIPAC PAC, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.aipacpac.org/