Audit Phase: V-ECON
Prepared: 2026-05-01
Subject Entity: ASDA Stores Ltd (Company No. 01777898, England & Wales)
Importer Subsidiary: International Procurement and Logistics Limited (IPL) (Company No. 05104448)
ASDA conducts its international fresh produce procurement through a wholly-owned subsidiary, International Procurement and Logistics Limited (IPL), registered at Asda House, Leeds, Company No. 05104448, confirmed via Companies House 3. IPL’s corporate website states it works “closely with growers” across multiple countries and “controls the whole supply chain: sourcing, shipping, packing, bottling and delivering,” explicitly describing a direct sourcing model rather than a broker-intermediated one 2. This structural arrangement makes IPL the legally accountable importer of record for fresh produce entering ASDA’s supply chain from international origins.
This role is confirmed by a primary government document: the UK Health and Safety Executive Pesticide Residues Committee (PRC) Q2 2016 Brand Name Annex explicitly identifies “IPL Ltd” as the packer/importer for Rio Red grapefruit and Marsh White grapefruit of Israeli origin tested in that quarter 17. This constitutes direct primary-source evidence that IPL operated as the importer of record for Israeli-origin citrus as of 2016.
The confirmed period of IPL’s Israeli-origin citrus sourcing has been extended by the Nador Cott litigation record. Nador Cott Protection S.A.S. v Asda Stores Ltd and International Procurement and Logistics Ltd [2022] EWHC 2081 (IPEC), decided by the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in July 2022 31, establishes as a matter of legal record that IPL was actively importing Nadorcott mandarin fruit grown in Israel into the UK throughout the infringement period covered by the proceedings, which spans approximately 2017–2021. This constitutes Tier 1 (court record) corroboration of IPL’s importer-of-record role for Israeli-origin citrus fruit during this period — a materially higher evidentiary tier than the NGO and government pesticide monitoring documentation for the pre-2017 period. The ongoing status of this relationship post-2021 has not been publicly confirmed or denied in any corporate disclosure, government document, or press report identifiable in available sources.
Multiple sources — spanning NGO investigative reports, campaign documentation, a government pesticide residue annex, and a UK court judgment — identify Israeli entities within or adjacent to ASDA’s supply chain:
An IPL corporate blog post from August 2018 discusses sourcing mangoes from Israel, naming Israeli growers as part of their direct-sourcing network 20. While this post concerns mangoes rather than settlement-categorised produce, it independently corroborates IPL’s active commercial relationship with Israeli agricultural suppliers during the same period covered by the PRC pesticide annex and the early portion of the Nador Cott infringement period.
The Jordan Valley — where Mehadrin and Hadiklaim’s member cooperatives operate — is located within the West Bank (occupied territory under international law, confirmed by the ICJ 2004 Wall opinion and the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 37). It is not within Israel’s internationally recognised pre-1967 borders. The relevant settlement locations confirmed in Who Profits documentation 3334 are:
Mehadrin’s confirmed settlement-linked operations include activity in the Jericho area and Jordan Valley (West Bank), with a packing house at Beit She’an (within Israel’s recognised borders, used for sorting produce from both Israeli and West Bank sources), and export of Jordan Valley-grown dates and citrus under “Produce of Israel” labelling 331011.
No evidence of ASDA/IPL sourcing from Golan Heights-based or East Jerusalem-based producers has been identified. No public evidence identified for those territories.
Open Food Facts (user-contributed product database, undated) records an ASDA own-label Medjoul date product (barcode 5054781712718) with origin listed as Israel 26. This should be treated as indicative only, as Open Food Facts is not a verified regulatory or corporate source. It is consistent with, but does not independently confirm, the NGO literature identifying Israeli-origin dates on ASDA shelves.
FruiTrop (CIRAD, 2019) documents that Israel is a significant counter-seasonal supplier of citrus, avocados, and peppers to the UK market during the December–April winter window 29. This seasonal trade pattern is consistent with the documented sourcing relationships and the timing of the 2016 pesticide residue sample. Corporate Occupation (2020) similarly documents UK supermarket reliance on Israeli fresh herbs and avocados during the European winter, identifying Jordan Valley production as dominant 10.
Corporate Occupation (2020, Part 6) identifies Greenyard Fresh (a Belgian multinational with UK ripening and packing facilities) and Mor International (described as a settlement-based exporter) as intermediaries for Israeli avocados entering UK supermarkets 19. A direct documentary link between Greenyard Fresh and ASDA specifically — as opposed to UK supermarkets generally — is not confirmed in any source beyond this single NGO report’s assertions. This specific ASDA–Greenyard link should be treated as unverified beyond activist campaign documentation.
The UK Government’s Chemicals Regulation Division (CRD) / HSE Pesticide Residues Committee published quarterly monitoring data including brand-name annexes through to at least 2021 44. Review of available training-data knowledge of post-2016 quarterly annexes does not identify a specific further named reference to “IPL Ltd” as importer for Israeli-origin produce in any quarter between 2017 and 2021 beyond the 2016 Q2 entry 17. This may reflect the discontinuation of named brand-level annexes in later quarters, a change in sampling selection, or a change in IPL’s product range; it does not constitute evidence of cessation of the sourcing relationship, particularly given the Nador Cott litigation evidence confirming IPL’s Israeli-origin citrus sourcing through approximately 2021 31. The Nador Cott court record is the superior evidentiary basis for the 2017–2021 period.
DEFRA guidance — confirmed in its pre-Brexit form and reconfirmed under the UK’s retained EU law framework following the UK’s departure from the EU in January 2021 32 — establishes that produce grown in Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan Heights must be labelled distinctly as “Produce of the West Bank (Israeli settlement produce)” rather than simply “Produce of Israel.” This requirement distinguishes occupied-territory produce from goods originating within Israel’s internationally recognised borders. Post-Brexit, the UK retained the substance of the EU’s 2015 labelling guidance (Interpretative Notice 2015/C 375/05) as a matter of domestic UK law and DEFRA policy 32.
Multiple source classes raise labelling compliance questions for ASDA’s Israeli-origin date products:
The specific claim that Mehadrin’s corporate website explicitly listed “Offa Exotics” as one of its brands is sourced exclusively from activist campaign material. No archived Mehadrin corporate document, independent journalism, or regulatory record confirming this sub-claim has been identified. It must be treated as unverified. Additional review of UK press archives (Guardian, BBC, Financial Times, Independent, Mirror) has not identified any mainstream reporting on the “Offa Exotics” brand at ASDA, and no Trading Standards enforcement record citing this brand in connection with ASDA has been identified 45. This sub-claim should not be elevated to a finding without a primary document (archived product image with clear ASDA shelf placement and Mehadrin branding, a Mehadrin corporate document, or a Trading Standards/DEFRA record).
ASDA’s corporate responsible sourcing page 6 and Modern Slavery Statements for 2022 8, 2023, and 2024 40 reference commitments to ethical trading and human rights in supply chains. None of these documents contains any explicit policy statement on sourcing from occupied or contested territories, on settlement-produce labelling specifically, or on the DEFRA West Bank labelling requirement 32. The 2023 and 2024 Modern Slavery Statements identify fresh produce as a higher-risk sourcing category subject to enhanced due diligence, but do not contain any specific reference to Israel, the occupied territories, or the DEFRA labelling requirement, and do not confirm or deny the continuation of Israeli produce sourcing 40.
No public evidence has been identified of any ASDA corporate policy document specifically addressing settlement-origin goods or West Bank labelling compliance.
UK Trading Standards enforcement of the settlement labelling requirement has been documented as patchy and inconsistently applied across local authority areas 45. No public evidence has been identified of any Trading Standards prosecution, DEFRA enforcement notice, or parliamentary question specifically naming ASDA for settlement-produce mislabelling. A 2021 parliamentary question confirmed the legal obligation and indicated enforcement was a matter for Trading Standards, without naming any specific retailer as under investigation 45. No DEFRA enforcement action specifically targeting ASDA has been identified in available sources.
The UN OHCHR’s February 2020 publication of a database of business enterprises with ties to Israeli settlements generated significant UK press coverage 2122. ASDA is not identified in available sources as a named entity in that UN OHCHR database — consistent with ASDA/IPL’s relationship to settlements being characterised as commercial produce procurement rather than any of the six enumerated operational categories (provision of equipment for demolitions; surveillance equipment supply; settlement construction; resource extraction equipment; financing of settlement construction; provision of services to settlers) 2122. Amnesty International UK’s commentary on the UN list similarly does not name ASDA in available sources 22.
No corporate statement by ASDA confirming the continuation or termination of its Israeli produce sourcing in response to the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 37, which declared Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory unlawful and addressed trade in settlement-origin goods, has been identified in available sources. ASDA has not, to available training-data knowledge, issued any public statement acknowledging or responding to this Advisory Opinion or to the ICC arrest warrants issued on 21 November 2024 38. Status of post-July 2024 continuation: unknown from public disclosures. No confirmed termination; no confirmed continuation statement identified.
Nador Cott Protection S.A.S. v Asda Stores Limited and International Procurement and Logistics Limited [2022] EWHC 2081 (IPEC) 31 concerns plant variety rights in the Nadorcott mandarin cultivar. The claimant held plant variety rights under EU and UK Plant Variety Rights regimes; the defendants — ASDA and IPL — were alleged to have imported and commercialised Nadorcott mandarin fruit grown in Israel without a licence. The case is a UK court proceeding, not an NGO or advocacy document. It constitutes independent legal-system corroboration, at a higher evidentiary tier than NGO reports, of IPL’s importer-of-record role for Israeli-origin citrus fruit during the infringement period (approximately 2017–2021 per available knowledge of the pleadings). This case is cross-referenced in the Supply Chain section above.
No public evidence has been identified of ASDA holding direct capital investments — including factories, distribution hubs, real estate, data centres, or any fixed assets — within Israel or the occupied territories. All known ASDA retail and logistics operational assets are UK-based per all available corporate disclosures 17.
No public evidence has been identified of ASDA operating R&D facilities, technology innovation labs, accelerator programmes, or formal technology partnerships with Israeli-domiciled entities.
The confirmed beneficial ownership structure of ASDA as of late 2024, following Zuber Issa’s exit from the ASDA stake in November 2024 in a transaction with TDR Capital 36, per TDR Capital’s own portfolio page and corroborating reporting 4:
The 2021 acquisition was valued at approximately £6.8 billion and was debt-financed through a syndicate including Barclays, ING, Lloyds Banking Group, and Morgan Stanley 9.
TDR Capital is a UK-domiciled private equity firm managing in excess of €15 billion AUM 5. It is not publicly listed and does not publish portfolio-level fund accounts subject to public scrutiny.
No public evidence has been identified of TDR Capital holding direct disclosed investments in Israeli-domiciled companies, Israeli sovereign bonds, or Israel-focused funds, separate from any portfolio company’s own operational commercial activity. TDR Capital’s co-founders (Manjit Dale and Stephen Robertson) are not identified in available financial press as holding personal Israeli investment exposure or sitting on boards of Israeli-domiciled entities 5. TDR Capital’s limited partner base is not publicly disclosed; whether any Israeli institutional investor participates as a TDR LP cannot be confirmed or denied on available public evidence. No public evidence of Israeli LP participation in TDR Capital identified; status unknown.
No named financial institution among ASDA’s confirmed debt syndicate (Barclays, ING, Lloyds, Morgan Stanley) appears in available sources in connection with ASDA-related Israeli exposure specifically. These institutions appear separately in financial-sector exposure analyses (such as the DBIO reports) in connection with their own portfolio-level exposure to settlement-active companies — this is not attributable to ASDA 9. Attribution to ASDA not established.
All four Israeli-Nexus Floor factors are absent on available evidence:
| Factor | Evidence | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Founded in Israel | ASDA founded 1949, Yorkshire, England 7 | Not met |
| HQ / principal management in Israel | Leeds, England 3 | Not met |
| Israeli tax residency | No evidence identified | Not met |
| Beneficially owned / controlled by Israeli capital | TDR (UK/CI), Issa (UK), Walmart (US) 4 | Not met |
ASDA is a UK-founded, UK-domiciled, UK-managed enterprise with no identified Israeli beneficial ownership.
TDR Capital’s acquisition of Aggreko (the global temporary power solutions provider) in August 2021 as part of a consortium with I Squared Capital is confirmed 42. Aggreko’s corporate website confirms it markets power solutions to the government and military sector, including base camps and weapons storage humidity control 23. Aggreko lists Israel as a location on its global language/location page 25. Aggreko was taken private in 2021 and no longer files public accounts at the level of a listed company; Companies House filings for Aggreko’s UK holding entity are abbreviated 42.
The specific claim that Aggreko holds active IDF (Israel Defence Forces) contracts is not confirmed in any public procurement record, Aggreko annual report or disclosure, or news report identifiable in available sources. Review across financial press (Financial Times, Bloomberg, Reuters), trade press (Power Engineering International, Diesel & Gas Turbine Worldwide), and Aggreko’s own disclosures has not identified any document confirming an active IDF contract 2342. Aggreko listing Israel as a market does not establish defence contracts with the IDF. This claim is unverified beyond prior AI memo assertions and is not reproduced as a finding.
Aggreko’s acquisition of solar energy company Infiniti Energy is confirmed 24. The inference that this acquisition strategically aligns with Israeli energy objectives is unsourced and is not treated as a finding of this audit.
I Squared Capital (co-owner of Aggreko) is a US-domiciled infrastructure private equity fund. No Israeli investment nexus for I Squared Capital attributable to Aggreko or TDR Capital has been identified in available sources. No public evidence identified.
TDR Capital’s ownership of David Lloyd Leisure is confirmed 27. Claims from prior analysis that David Lloyd Leisure’s App Store developer logs evidence an Israeli operational presence, or that DLL sources EPoS systems from ECR Retail Systems (Ramat Gan, Israel), are not confirmable from any corporate filing, App Store record, or trade press article identifiable in available sources. These claims are unverified beyond prior AI memo assertions and are not reproduced as findings.
Stonegate is identified in available reporting as a TDR Capital portfolio asset 30. No public evidence has been identified of Stonegate holding operational or investment exposure within Israel or the occupied territories.
No public evidence of ASDA appearing in DBIO 2024 or 2025 identified.No public evidence identified.No public evidence identified.No public evidence identified.No public evidence identified.No public evidence identified.ASDA is not a financial-sector entity. Applying the financing-the-state rubric factors:
No public evidence identified.No public evidence identified.Not applicable.Not applicable as a financing relationship.The £6.8 billion acquisition financing 9 creates a leveraged capital structure. The terms, covenants, and syndication of post-2021 refinancing rounds are not publicly available at the level of detail required to assess any Israeli lender participation. No Israeli financial institution participation in ASDA’s debt syndicate has been identified in available sources.
No public evidence has been identified of ASDA operating offices, retail locations, warehouses, distribution facilities, or any form of commercial support centre within Israel or the occupied territories. All known ASDA retail and logistics operations are UK-based 17. ASDA operates over 600 stores across Great Britain and is not identified in any corporate communication, regulatory filing, or trade-press report as operating or planning to operate internationally.
No public evidence has been identified of ASDA employees, tax registrations, employer identification numbers, or regulatory filings within the Israeli jurisdiction. ASDA’s workforce, numbering in excess of 150,000, is documented as entirely UK-based in available corporate disclosures.
No public evidence has been identified of ASDA characterising Israel as a target retail market in any annual report, investor presentation, regulatory filing, or press release. Israel is not identified in any available source as a market in which ASDA operates commercially as a retailer, whether directly or through a franchisee or joint venture arrangement.
ASDA holds approximately 14–15% of the UK grocery market (per Kantar Worldpanel data confirmed in available training-data sources). This is a national market position in the UK, not Israel. No IDF-defence relationship is identified for ASDA.
The operational-presence dimension of ASDA’s relationship with Israeli entities is limited, per available evidence, to the commercial procurement activity documented in the Supply Chain section above — specifically, the purchase of Israeli-origin fresh produce through IPL. This is a buyer–supplier commercial relationship, not an operational presence in the Israeli jurisdiction.
EG Group Limited (Company No. 09376035), co-founded by the Issa family and beneficially controlled by the Issa family, is a distinct legal entity from ASDA. Following Zuber Issa’s exit from the ASDA stake in November 2024 36, the corporate separation between ASDA (majority TDR Capital) and EG Group (majority Issa family) is more clearly delineated. EG Group’s operational territories are confirmed as UK, Ireland, continental Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg), US, and Australia 39. Israel is not an EG Group operating territory in any available source; EG Group’s annual reports and financial press coverage do not identify Israeli operations, Israeli franchisees, Israeli joint ventures, or Israeli supply-chain partners 39. No public evidence of EG Group Israeli operational or investment exposure identified.
No public evidence has been identified of personal or family-office investments by the Issa family in Israeli-domiciled companies, Israeli sovereign bonds, or Israel-focused funds in any press reporting, Companies House filing, or financial disclosure in available training data. No public evidence of Issa family Israeli investment exposure identified.
ASDA was founded in 1949 in Yorkshire, England, as a dairy cooperative (Associated Dairies & Farm Stores Limited), subsequently rebranded as ASDA 7. The company has no Israeli founding history, no Israeli incorporation, and no brand-origin connection to Israel or any Israeli entity. It is an entirely British-origin enterprise.
ASDA was acquired by Walmart Inc. in 1999 for approximately £6.7 billion and operated as a Walmart subsidiary for over two decades until the 2021 TDR Capital / Issa Brothers acquisition 179.
No dual headquarters, Israeli branch registration, or secondary legal domicile in Israel has been identified.
No public evidence has been identified of:
– Any Israeli state ownership stake in ASDA or its parent entities.
– Any Israeli government-appointed board member or observer.
– Any Israeli government contract held directly by ASDA Stores Ltd.
– Any designation of ASDA as Israeli critical national infrastructure.
Walmart’s residual 10% equity stake and board seat 443 constitutes US corporate — not Israeli state — linkage. TDR Capital’s UK domicile and absence of identified Israeli sovereign or institutional limited partners means no Israeli state-level structural tie flows upward through the ownership chain on the basis of available evidence.
No public evidence has been identified of golden shares, founder shares, charter restrictions, or any governance instrument tying ASDA’s strategic decision-making, operational direction, or profit distribution to the Israeli state or any Israeli governmental objective.
During the Walmart era (1999–2021), ASDA benefited from Walmart’s global supply-chain infrastructure and technology platforms. Walmart’s own Israeli supply-chain and retail market relationships are documented separately in Walmart-specific analyses and are not attributed to ASDA in available sources.
Training-data knowledge of the UN Special Rapporteur’s 2025 report (A/HRC/59/23, “economy of genocide”) extends to its structural framework and named sectors. The report’s retail and agribusiness sections discuss UK and European supermarket chains’ procurement of Israeli-origin agricultural produce — particularly dates, avocados, and citrus — and the role of settlement-based production in that supply chain, specifically referencing Jordan Valley date and avocado production and European import chains. ASDA is not named by name in A/HRC/59/23 in any available training-data source; the report’s retail/agribusiness section discusses the sector generically and names specific Israeli exporters (including Hadiklaim) rather than European retailer end-buyers. No confirmed named appearance of ASDA in A/HRC/59/23 identified.
ASDA’s reported revenue for financial year 2023 was approximately £21.9 billion, per Companies House group filings 41. No portion of this revenue is attributed to Israel as a consumer or commercial market in any public filing, consistent with ASDA having no retail or commercial operations within Israel. Revenue is generated entirely from UK consumer and trade sales.
Profits generated by ASDA flow upward to the three equity holders:
All three beneficial owners are domiciled outside Israel. No profit repatriation into Israel has been identified on the basis of available evidence. The destination of TDR Capital fund-level distributions beyond these registered entities is not publicly disclosed, as TDR is a non-listed limited partnership structure 5 and does not publish fund accounts.
While ASDA does not operate within Israel, its procurement activity through IPL does direct a portion of ASDA’s goods purchasing budget toward Israeli agricultural suppliers (Mehadrin, Hadiklaim via their member settlement cooperatives, Galilee Export, and potentially others) as documented in the Supply Chain section 10121731. The quantum of this procurement spend is not disclosed in any public filing. This constitutes indirect economic contribution to Israeli agricultural enterprises via commercial purchasing — including enterprises whose production is located in West Bank settlements — rather than investment-based economic contribution.
The prior memo’s inference that ASDA’s cash flows “cross-collateralize” Aggreko’s military contracts via TDR Capital fund mechanics is a theoretical financial construct with no documentary basis in any filing, contractual disclosure, or reporting identifiable in available sources. This inference is not reproduced as a finding of this audit.
ASDA’s tax contributions are paid within the UK jurisdiction. No Israeli tax registrations, withholding tax obligations, or Israeli tax authority filings have been identified in available sources. ASDA’s UK tax affairs are subject to HMRC oversight; no publicly known transfer-pricing disputes, HMRC investigations, or tax avoidance structures with Israeli nexus have been identified.
No public evidence has been identified of any Israeli government body, trade association, industry regulator, or independent economic assessment characterising ASDA as a significant participant in any sector of the Israeli economy. ASDA’s economic relationship with Israel is limited, per available evidence, to its role as a buyer of Israeli agricultural exports — a relationship that contributes to the revenues of Israeli agricultural producers and exporters (including settlement-based cooperatives within the Hadiklaim and Mehadrin networks) but does not constitute an operational, investment, or institutional presence within the Israeli economy.
https://www.ipl-ltd.com/about-us/ ↩
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05104448 ↩↩↩
https://corporate.asda.com/responsible-sourcing-and-human-rights ↩
https://asdagroceries.scene7.com/is/content/asdagroceries/Z%20FUTURE/Microsites/Corporate/modern-slavery-statement-2022.pdf ↩
https://www.islamicfinanceguru.com/articles/the-inside-story-to-the-asda-takeover-how-muslims-should-respond ↩↩↩↩
https://corporateoccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2020/04/apartheid-in-the-fields-EBOOK.pdf ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.whoprofits.org/writable/uploads/old/uploads/2018/06/old/agricultural_export___flash_report.pdf ↩↩↩
https://www.ihrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Boycott-Israeli-Dates-2023-Inminds.pdf ↩↩↩
https://resistancekitchen.uk/are-these-dates-really-palestinian ↩
https://eastberkshirepsc.uk/news/boycott-israeli-produce-exposing-the-truth-behind-israeli-dates/ ↩
https://muslimnews.co.uk/newspaper/ramadan/muslims-urged-to-boycott-israeli-dates-during-ramadan ↩
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f3294e5274a2e87db4644/pesticide-residues-quarter2-2016-brand-name-annex.pdf ↩↩↩
https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/12/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-3-4-galilee/ ↩
https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/13/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-part-6-the-complicity-of-european-importers-and-packing-houses/ ↩
https://www.ipl-ltd.com/2018/08/29/moreish-mangoes/ ↩
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/12/un-publishes-list-of-companies-with-ties-to-israeli-settlements ↩↩
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/un-exposes-companies-involved-israeli-settlements-and-why-it-matters ↩↩↩
https://www.pv-tech.org/aggreko-acquires-ci-company-infiniti-energy-solarbank-adds-ontario-pv-portfolio/ ↩
https://www.aggreko.com/en/language-and-location ↩
https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/5054781712718/medjoul-dates-asda ↩
https://www.secondariesinvestor.com/tdr-secures-latest-european-single-asset-cv-for-gym-chain/ ↩
https://campalsoc.org/boycott-apartheid ↩
https://www.fruitrop.com/en/Articles-by-theme/Production-and-trade/Israel-a-major-exporter-of-counter-seasonal-citrus ↩
https://www.propelhospitality.com/2024/06/stonegate-pub-company-debt-restructuring/ ↩
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/IPEC/2022/2081.html ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-labelling-produce-from-israeli-controlled-territories ↩↩↩↩
https://www.whoprofits.org/company/hadiklaim-israel-jordan-valley-date-growers-cooperative-association ↩↩
https://www.whoprofits.org/company/galilee-export ↩
https://news.sky.com/story/zuber-issa-exits-asda-stake-in-deal-with-tdr-capital-13248614 ↩↩
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-state-palestine-icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-rejects-state-of-israels-challenges ↩
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01777898/filing-history ↩
https://www.aggreko.com/en-gb/news/2021/aggreko-acquisition-completed/ ↩↩↩
https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/walmart-reduce-stake-asda-after-issa-brothers-buy-more-shares-2023-02-02/ ↩↩↩
https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/pesticides-in-food/residues-monitoring-reports.htm ↩
https://www.tradingstandards.uk/news-policy-and-research/news-listing/2021-news/trading-standards-guidance-on-labelling-of-produce-from-the-occupied-territories/ ↩↩↩
