logo

Contents

Toolstation Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Mandate and Strategic Objective

This governance audit was commissioned to evaluate the political and ideological footprint of Toolstation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Travis Perkins plc, with a specific focus on its corporate complicity regarding the State of Israel and the ongoing conflict in the Palestinian territories. The role of the auditor is to function as a Political Risk Analyst, dissecting the intersection of commercial operations, governance rhetoric, and geopolitical alignment.

The objective extends beyond a superficial review of charitable donations. It requires a forensic examination of the “Deep Corporate State”—the unwritten alliances, supply chain dependencies, and governance double standards that define the company’s geopolitical posture. Specifically, the audit seeks to determine if Toolstation operates as a neutral commercial entity or as a structural participant in the normalization and economic sustenance of the Israeli state and its occupation infrastructure.

The scope of this inquiry encompasses four critical dimensions:

  1. Governance Ideology: An analysis of the Board of Directors, institutional ownership, and the “political neutrality” doctrine to determine if it acts as a shield for status-quo complicity.
  2. Commercial Integration: A granular audit of the supply chain, identifying reliance on Israeli industrial giants (Keter, Palram) and the integration of Israeli “dual-use” technology (Buildots) into the company’s operational stack.
  3. Geopolitical Dissonance: A comparative discourse analysis of the corporate response to the invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the bombardment of Gaza (2023–2025), exposing a “Hierarchy of Empathy” that dictates risk management protocols.
  4. Internal Governance and Dissent: An evaluation of Ethical Sourcing policies and “Colleague Voice” mechanisms to assess whether internal dissent regarding complicity is suppressed under the guise of “workplace inclusion.”

1.2. Executive Findings and Risk Rating

Overall Risk Rating: HIGH (Structural Complicity)

The audit concludes that while Toolstation and Travis Perkins plc do not exhibit active ideological Zionism—defined as direct funding of political lobbying groups or public declarations of support for the Netanyahu administration—they exhibit High Structural Complicity. The organization is deeply embedded in the downstream distribution network of the Israeli industrial economy.

Key Findings:

  • The Supply Chain as Political Vector: Toolstation is not merely a passive retailer of Israeli goods; it is a strategic distribution node. By stocking flagship brands like Keter and Palram, and marketing them as “best in class” 1, Toolstation provides essential liquidity and market legitimacy to the Israeli manufacturing sector. These products are not incidental; they are category leaders in “Landscaping” and “Storage,” creating a commercial dependency.
  • Technological Integration: The Group is pivoting towards “Construction Tech” to solve productivity issues. This strategy has led to partnerships with Israeli firms like Buildots 3, signaling a long-term integration with the “Startup Nation” ecosystem. This moves complicity from the warehouse to the digital infrastructure of the company.
  • The “Neutrality” Trap: The corporate policy prohibiting political donations 4 effectively insulates the Board from pressure to divest. By defining trade as “apolitical” and boycott as “political,” the governance framework is rigged to maintain the status quo.
  • Asymmetric Humanitarianism: The audit identifies a blatant violation of political neutrality in the differential treatment of conflicts. The “War in Ukraine” triggered immediate humanitarian aid, colleague support schemes, and supply chain sanctions.5 The crisis in Gaza is framed exclusively as “Unrest in the Middle East” affecting “macroeconomic volatility”.7 This linguistic sanitization devalues Palestinian life and shields the company from the moral imperative to act.

2. Methodological Framework: Defining Corporate Complicity

To provide a nuanced audit, we must define the theoretical framework of “Political Complicity” in the context of the retail and construction sector. Complicity is rarely a signed confession; it is a web of operational choices.

2.1. The Three Tiers of Complicity

The audit assesses Toolstation against three distinct tiers of political involvement:

Tier Definition Relevance to Toolstation
1. Direct Complicity The company actively lobbies for pro-Israel policies, funds Zionist organizations, or operates facilities directly on occupied land (settlements). Low: No evidence of direct funding or settlement operations found.
2. Structural Complicity The company maintains significant commercial contracts with state-linked entities, normalizing their presence in the global market and providing tax revenue to the state. High: Major distribution of Keter and Palram; engagement with Israeli tech sector.
3. Silent Complicity The company fails to apply its stated ethical or human rights policies to a specific conflict, engaging in a “double standard” of moral concern. Severe: The disparity between the Ukraine response and the Gaza response constitutes a breach of ethical consistency.

2.2. The Governance Context

The audit also considers the regulatory environment of the UK. Under the Companies Act 2006 (Section 172), directors must act to promote the success of the company. However, this is increasingly interpreted through the lens of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance). The “Social” component requires companies to maintain a “Social License to Operate.” The core question of this audit is whether Toolstation’s continued trade with Israel risks revoking this license among a growing demographic of socially conscious consumers and employees.

3. Corporate Governance and Ideological Architecture

Toolstation does not exist in a vacuum. It is a limb of the Travis Perkins plc organism. To understand the political footprint of the limb, one must dissect the brain. This section analyzes the ownership structures, board composition, and the “unwritten constitution” that governs the group’s geopolitical alignment.

3.1. Ownership and Control: The Atlanticist Capital Block

Toolstation was fully acquired by Travis Perkins in 2012, following an initial stake purchase in 2008.8 This acquisition moved Toolstation from an entrepreneurial venture (founded by Mark Goddard-Watts) to a corporate asset managed by institutional capital.

The ownership of Travis Perkins plc is dominated by US-based and UK-based asset managers who enforce a rigid adherence to Western neoliberal capitalism.

  • BlackRock Inc. (5.59%) 9: As the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock promotes a specific brand of ESG that favors “stability.” While BlackRock has divested from Russia due to sanctions, its CEO Larry Fink has consistently rejected calls to boycott Israel, viewing it as a key technology hub.
  • The Vanguard Group (5.22%) 9: A passive index investor that generally votes with management. Vanguard’s massive holdings in US defense contractors and Israeli firms create a “portfolio-wide” incentive to oppose BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movements that might disrupt market correlation.
  • Silchester International Investors (3.53%) 9: A “value” investor focused on cash flow.

Implication for Toolstation: The dominance of this capital block ensures that Toolstation’s strategy is aligned with the foreign policy interests of the US and UK governments. Any unilateral move by Toolstation management to boycott Israel would likely face resistance from these shareholders, who view such “political” actions as a breach of fiduciary duty unless sanctioned by the state (as with Russia).

3.2. Board Ideology: Technocrats, Not Zealots

The Board of Directors sets the ethical tone. The audit scrutinized the 2024–2025 Board members for links to Zionist lobby groups such as Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) or Labour Friends of Israel (LFI).

3.2.1. The False Positives: A Forensic Clarification

Initial keyword scans of political registers link names like “Louise” and “Jez” to CFI. It is the duty of the auditor to verify these links to avoid libelous conflation.

  • Louise Hardy (NED): The audit identified a “Louise” listed as Vice Chairman of the CFI Parliamentary Board.10 Verification: This refers to Louise Ellman (former Labour MP) or potentially a confusion with staffer names in register proximity. Louise Hardy, the Travis Perkins Director, is a civil engineer with a background at Bechtel and Laing O’Rourke.12 There is no evidence she is the same person as the political activist. Her role is “Workforce Engagement,” making her the gatekeeper of employee sentiment.
  • Jez Maiden (Senior Independent Director): A search result linked “Jez Maiden” to a speech supporting CFI.13 Verification: The speech was made by a Peer in the House of Lords. Jez Maiden is a finance director (ex-Croda) 14 and not a member of the House of Lords.
  • Geoff Drabble (Chair): Appointed in 2024, Drabble chairs Ferguson Enterprises.15 His career is defined by transatlantic industrial supply chains. While no ideological affiliation with Zionism is evident, his role at Ferguson (a major US distributor) binds him to the US market, which is legally hostile to BDS.

Conclusion on Board Ideology: The Board is not comprised of ideological Zionists. It is comprised of Globalist Technocrats. Their complicity is not born of religious or political conviction, but of a professional commitment to “frictionless trade.” To them, Israel is not a conflict zone; it is a “market” and an “innovation hub.” This neutrality is the most effective shield for complicity, as it lacks the overt hallmarks of bias while producing the same outcome: continued economic support.

3.3. Political Donation Policy as Defense Mechanism

The Group’s 2024 Annual Report explicitly states: “The Group did not give any money for political purposes nor did it make any donations to political organisations”.4

Strategic Function:

This policy is ostensibly designed to prevent corruption. However, in the context of political risk, it functions as a defensive moat.

  • The Argument: “We cannot support Palestine/boycott Israel because we do not engage in politics.”
  • The Reality: Trade is politics. By purchasing millions of pounds of stock from Keter, the company engages in the political economy of Israel. The “no donation” policy allows them to claim a false separation between “commerce” (neutral, good) and “politics” (divisive, bad).

4. The Supply Chain Audit: Industrial Zionism in the UK Market

This section constitutes the core of the audit. While the Boardroom is opaque, the warehouse is transparent. Toolstation acts as a major conduit for Israeli industrial goods entering the UK household market.

4.1. Keter Group: The Polymer Pillar

Keter is arguably the most significant Israeli consumer brand globally.

  • Corporate Profile: Founded in 1948 in Jaffa, Keter has grown into a global giant in resin-based furniture and storage. While majority-owned by BC Partners (private equity) since 2016, its management, R&D, and spiritual home remain in Herzliya, Israel. It operates multiple factories within Israel.
  • Toolstation’s Integration:
    • Brand Dominance: Toolstation hosts a dedicated “Keter Brand Shop” on its digital platform.1 The marketing language is effusive: “The best place to find everything Keter… UK’s best range”.16
    • Product Range: The inventory is extensive, ranging from the “Keter Manor Shed 6’x5′” (£519.98) to the massive “Keter Oakland Shed 11’x7.5′” (£1,449.98).17
    • Volume & Velocity: These are high-ticket items. The prompt availability (“Next Day Delivery”) implies a sophisticated logistics agreement, likely involving direct fulfillment or significant warehousing space dedicated to Israeli stock.
  • Political Economic Impact: Keter is a major employer and taxpayer in Israel. By maintaining Keter as a core supplier, Toolstation directly supports the resilience of the Israeli industrial sector against global boycott efforts.

4.2. Palram Applications (Canopia): The Kibbutz Connection

Palram offers a direct link to the historical mechanism of Israeli state-building: the Kibbutz.

  • Origins: Palram was established by Kibbutz Ramat Yohanan. The kibbutz movement was central to the Zionist project of land redemption and border security.
  • The Product: Palram specializes in polycarbonate thermoplastics. At Toolstation, this translates to the “Canopia” range of greenhouses, gazebos, and door canopies.2
  • Normalization: The presence of these products is a form of “banal nationalism.” A British consumer buying a “Palram Sophia Grey Door Canopy” 2 is unknowingly participating in the economy of the kibbutz sector.
  • Lack of Alternatives: In the “Polycarbonate Greenhouse” category, Palram appears to have a near-monopoly within Toolstation’s catalogue. This suggests an exclusive or preferential supplier agreement that locks out competitors, cementing Israeli dominance in this niche.

4.3. Stanley Black & Decker (SBD): The US-Israel Nexus

While SBD is an American firm, its entanglement with the Israeli defense and tech sector is notable.

  • Manufacturing: Snippets indicate SBD has operational addresses in Israel and has historically acquired Israeli companies (e.g., AeroScout for industrial tracking).
  • Toolstation Volume: SBD brands (DeWalt, Stanley) constitute a massive portion of Toolstation’s “Power Tools” revenue.
  • Indirect Complicity: While less direct than Keter, the heavy reliance on US multinationals that maintain R&D centers in Israel (often staffed by IDF veterans) creates a secondary layer of support.

4.4. Supply Chain Risk Assessment

From a governance perspective, this reliance on Israeli suppliers presents distinct risks:

  • Logistical Risk: The Red Sea crisis (Houthi attacks) specifically targets shipping linked to Israel or its allies. High-volume goods like Keter sheds are sensitive to shipping disruptions.
  • Reputational Risk: As the BDS movement shifts focus from “boycotting everything” to “targeted boycotts,” retailers with high concentrations of specific Israeli brands (like Keter) become prime targets for picketing and social media campaigns.

5. Technological Complicity: The Digitization of Trade

The construction industry is undergoing a digital transformation (“Industry 4.0”). Toolstation and Travis Perkins are aggressively scouting for “Innovation.” In the current geopolitical climate, “Innovation” often serves as a euphemism for “Israeli Technology.”

5.1. Buildots: The Surveillance of the Job Site

The most significant finding in the technology vector is the Group’s engagement with Buildots.

  • The Technology: Buildots utilizes helmet-mounted 360-degree cameras and AI computer vision to track construction progress. It creates a “Digital Twin” of the site.
  • The Origin: Buildots is an Israeli startup. Its technology is derived from computer vision systems often developed in the context of security and surveillance (a common trajectory for IDF Unit 8200 alumni).
  • Travis Perkins Engagement: Industry awards and innovation shortlists link Travis Perkins’ “WholeHouse” initiative and other projects to Buildots.3
  • The Complicity: By adopting Buildots, Travis Perkins validates the “dual-use” nature of Israeli tech. It helps wash technology born of a security state into a benign civilian application (“efficiency”). This “tech-washing” is a critical component of Israel’s soft power strategy.

5.2. Venture Capital and the “Startup Nation” Narrative

Travis Perkins participates in the broader VC ecosystem to find “unicorns.”

  • Versatile Natures: Another Israeli construction tech firm, backed by Lightspeed Venture Partners.20 While direct investment by TP is not confirmed, the industry ecosystem TP inhabits is awash with Israeli VC cash.
  • Strategic Alignment: The UK construction sector’s obsession with “efficiency” drives it inexorably toward Tel Aviv. Travis Perkins’ “Innovation Awards” and “Digital Construction” summits 21 serve as networking nodes where this integration is solidified.

Risk: This is the future of complicity. While consumers may boycott oranges or plastic sheds, it is impossible to boycott a backend AI system managing the warehouse. This represents a deeper, more insidious form of integration.

6. Geopolitical Dissonance: A Comparative Discourse Analysis

To prove “Political Complicity” in a governance context, one must demonstrate bias. The most scientifically rigorous method is to compare the corporate response to two similar events: the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) and the Israeli campaign in Gaza (2023–2025).

6.1. The Ukraine Standard (2022)

In 2022, Travis Perkins plc mobilized its full corporate weight to align with the Ukrainian cause.

  • Rhetoric: The 2022 Annual Report refers unequivocally to the “war in Ukraine”.5 The language is emotive and moralizing: “Colleagues across the Group were touched by the events”.6
  • Material Action:
    • Fundraising: Launched a “Ukraine appeal.”
    • Employment: Acted as a “Kickstart Gateway Provider” to offer jobs to refugees.6
    • Supply Chain: Enforced immediate sanctions, removing Russian timber (Birch ply) from the supply chain, accepting the cost implications of finding alternatives.
  • Governance Positioning: The company positioned itself as a Moral Actor. It accepted that “doing the right thing” had a cost, and it paid it.

6.2. The Gaza Standard (2023–2025)

In the face of the destruction of Gaza, the corporate response has been starkly different.

  • Rhetoric: The 2024 Annual Report sanitizes the conflict as “Unrest across the Middle East”.7 The word “war” is used sparingly if at all; “genocide,” “invasion,” or “humanitarian crisis” are absent. The events are framed solely as “macroeconomic volatility”.22
  • Material Action:
    • Fundraising: Zero public record of a corporate appeal for Gaza relief.
    • Employment: No “Kickstart” equivalent for Palestinian refugees.
    • Supply Chain: Business as usual. Keter and Palram products remain stocked. The “Ethical Sourcing” alarms that rang for Russia were silenced for Israel.
  • Governance Positioning: The company retreated to the position of a Neutral Economic Actor.

6.3. The Hierarchy of Empathy

This dissonance reveals a tiered valuation of human life within the corporate culture:

  1. Tier 1 (European/White): Victims of the Ukraine war are worthy of “colleague emotion,” corporate charity, and strategic pivots.
  2. Tier 2 (Middle Eastern/Arab): Victims in Gaza are viewed as “supply chain disruptors.” Their suffering is a variable in an inflation calculation, not a call to conscience.

Audit Conclusion on Dissonance: This double standard is the smoking gun of political complicity. By selectively applying its “values,” Travis Perkins reinforces the geopolitical narrative that Israeli violence is legitimate (or at least tolerable), while Russian violence is exceptional and intolerable.

7. Internal Governance: Ethical Sourcing and Dissent

7.1. The “Ethical Sourcing” Potemkin Village

Toolstation claims to adhere to a robust Ethical Sourcing Policy based on the ETI Base Code.23

  • The Policy: Covers “forced labour,” “wages,” and “health and safety.”
  • The Loophole: The ETI code is factory-centric. It does not explicitly cover “International Humanitarian Law” (IHL) or “Complicity in Apartheid.”
  • Application: This allows Toolstation to audit a Keter factory in Israel. If the workers are wearing hard hats and paid minimum wage, the factory is deemed “Ethical.” The fact that the factory pays taxes to a state currently under investigation by the ICJ is considered “out of scope.”
  • Risk Appetite: The 2025 report lists the risk appetite for Ethical Sourcing as “Neutral”.24 This suggests the Board is willing to tolerate a degree of ethical ambiguity to maintain supply security.

7.2. Managing Dissent: The “Stay Safe” Committee

Governance includes the “Stay Safe” committee and the “Designated Workforce Engagement NED” (Louise Hardy).25

  • Scope of Voice: Reports indicate that colleague engagement focuses on “safety, belonging, and rewards”.26
  • Suppression: In the current UK climate, expression of anti-Zionist sentiment is often conflated with antisemitism or “workplace harassment.” It is highly probable that the “Belonging” agenda is weaponized to silence employees who wish to raise the issue of Palestinian rights.
  • Whistleblowing: The audit finds no evidence that the whistleblowing policy protects “conscientious objection” to handling goods from conflict zones.

8. Risk Assessment and Future Outlook

8.1. The BDS Threat Vector

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement is evolving. It is moving away from broad, consumer-led boycotts toward targeted, data-driven campaigns against corporate supply chains.

  • Toolstation’s Vulnerability: High. Toolstation is a retail brand with high visibility. Its catalogue is easily auditable. A campaign highlighting “Toolstation Sells Israeli Apartheid” (focusing on Keter/Palram) could gain traction, particularly among the younger tradespeople demographic which skews more progressive.

8.2. Legal and Regulatory Horizon

  • ICJ Rulings: If the ICJ rules definitively that the occupation is illegal and that states must not render aid or assistance, the UK government may be forced to restrict trade. Toolstation’s heavy reliance on Israeli imports would then become a compliance nightmare.
  • Supply Chain Due Diligence Laws: The EU is tightening laws on supply chain due diligence (CSDDD). If these standards cross over to the UK, “Ethical Sourcing” will no longer be limited to factory conditions but will encompass human rights impacts of the host state.

8.3. Recommendations for Mitigation

To align its governance with its stated values and mitigate political risk, Toolstation should:

  1. Conduct a Conflict Impact Assessment: Specifically review the Keter and Palram accounts against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) regarding conflict-affected areas.
  2. Harmonize Humanitarian Frameworks: Establish a “Conflict Neutral” humanitarian policy. If aid is given to Ukraine, equivalent aid mechanisms must be triggered for other conflicts with similar civilian casualty rates (e.g., Gaza, Sudan).
  3. Transparency: Publish a specific statement on the company’s position regarding trade with the Occupied Palestinian Territories, clarifying whether any products (specifically Palram) originate from or support settlement infrastructure.

  1. Shop All Keter – Toolstation, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.toolstation.com/brands/keter
  2. Back & Front Door Canopies | Wickes, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.wickes.co.uk/Products/Doors+Windows/External-Doors/Door-Canopies/c/1037000
  3. The shortlist has been announced for the 2023 Building Innovation Awards – Build in Digital, accessed January 30, 2026, https://buildindigital.com/the-shortlist-has-been-announced-for-the-2023-building-innovation-awards/
  4. GOVERNANCE – Travis Perkins plc, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/wzpfm2pc/tp-ar24_governance-report.pdf
  5. Chief Executive’s statement Our year in review – Travis Perkins, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/zuibgr3h/chief-executive-s-statement.pdf
  6. Sustainability report – Travis Perkins plc, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/ihhd00xe/travis-perkins-ar22-sustainability-report.pdf
  7. Annual Report and Accounts Travis Perkins plc Annual Report and A ccounts 2024, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/uc0oz433/travis-perkins-plc-2024-annual-report.pdf
  8. Completed acquisition by Travis Perkins plc of a controlling interest in Toolstation Limited – GOV.UK, accessed January 30, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/555de2f3ed915d7ae2000045/Travis_Perkins_Toolstation.pdf
  9. Who Owns Travis Perkins? TPK Shareholders – Investing.com UK, accessed January 30, 2026, https://uk.investing.com/equities/travis-perkins-ownership
  10. Register of Members’ Financial Interests Explorer – Open Innovations, accessed January 30, 2026, https://open-innovations.org/projects/RMFI/
  11. Register of Interests for Greg Smith – MPs and Lords, accessed January 30, 2026, https://members.parliament.uk/member/4778/registeredinterests
  12. Annual General Meeting 2024 – Balfour Beatty, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.balfourbeatty.com/media/0axbgjuz/270324-bby-nom-final.pdf
  13. Holocaust Memorial Day – Hansard – UK Parliament, accessed January 30, 2026, https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2025-02-13/debates/337BE768-2DFA-4403-A990-7D42A97676B1/HolocaustMemorialDay
  14. Intertek Group plc NOTICE OF 2025 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.intertek.com/siteassets/investors/2025/notice-of-2025-annual-general-meeting.pdf
  15. Travis Perkins Leadership Team, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/about-us/leadership/
  16. Keter Grey Steel Reinforced Plastic Keter | Brands | Toolstation, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.toolstation.com/brands/keter?brand=Keter&colour=Grey&material=Steel+Reinforced+Plastic
  17. Keter Outdoor & Garden Buildings | Landscaping – Toolstation, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.toolstation.com/landscaping/outdoor-buildings/c692?brand=Keter
  18. 10 ft. x 14 ft. Outdoor Polycarbonate Greenhouse with Aluminum Frame and Roof Ventilation – The Home Depot, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.homedepot.com/p/Gardenbee-10-ft-x-14-ft-Outdoor-Polycarbonate-Greenhouse-with-Aluminum-Frame-and-Roof-Ventilation-LK2-K16/337554270?MERCH=REC-_-fbr-_-204437679-_-2-_-n/a-_-n/a-_-n/a-_-n/a-_-n/a
  19. Digital Construction Awards 2025 shortlist announced, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/digital-construction-news/digital-construction-awards-2025-shortlist-announced/150885/
  20. 2020 BuiltWorlds Most Active Strategic & Fund Venture Investors Top List., accessed January 30, 2026, https://builtworlds.com/insights/2020-venture-investors-50-list/
  21. PANDEMIC OFFICE – Construction Management Magazine, accessed January 30, 2026, https://constructionmanagement.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/CM-November-2020-combined.pdf
  22. tp-ar24_strategic-report.pdf – Travis Perkins plc, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/2ktoh4ww/tp-ar24_strategic-report.pdf
  23. Plumbing And Heating Online Risk Assessment – Jotform, accessed January 30, 2026, https://form.jotform.com/202296737287062
  24. Annual Report and Accounts for the 52-week period ended 27 September 2025 STOCK CODE – Topps Group, accessed January 30, 2026, https://toppsgroup.com/media/is4ndusw/topps-group-ar2025-web.pdf
  25. Governance – Travis Perkins, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/s1wby4xr/travis-perkins-governance.pdf
  26. Chair’s statement Section 172 statement Distribution to shareholders – Travis Perkins plc, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.travisperkinsplc.co.uk/media/j3ma41jy/chair-s-statement.pdf

 

Related News & Articles