HSBC Political Audit

Executive Summary

1.1 Audit Scope and Objectives

This comprehensive governance audit and political risk assessment examines the operational, ideological, and financial footprint of HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict. The objective is to determine the extent of the bank’s “Political Complicity”—defined here as the degree to which the institution’s governance structures, capital flows, and internal policies materially or ideologically sustain the status quo of military occupation and asymmetric warfare in the region.

Commissioned under the rubric of Political Risk Analysis and Governance Auditing, this report responds to a specific query regarding the bank’s adherence to international human rights standards, its lobbying entanglements, and the consistency of its geopolitical risk application. The audit period covers the critical years of 2024 through early 2026, a timeframe characterized by the intensification of the conflict in Gaza and the West Bank, concurrent with the global response to the Russia-Ukraine war.

The analysis is structured around four core pillars:

1. Governance Ideology: An examination of the Board of Directors, executive leadership, and advisory bodies to identify affiliations with pro-Israel lobby groups (e.g., CFI, AIPAC, JNF) and the normalization of state narratives.
2. Lobbying & Trade: A review of the bank’s institutional integration with trade bodies such as the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and its sponsorship of “Brand Israel” initiatives.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Stress Test: A comparative analysis of the bank’s risk appetite and policy response to the Russia-Ukraine war versus the Israel-Palestine conflict, identifying governance asymmetries.
4. Material Complicity: A forensic accounting of proprietary and custodial investments in the defense sector (Elbit Systems, BAE Systems, Caterpillar) and the strategic pivot toward “Innovation Banking” as a mechanism for financing dual-use technology.

1.2 Summary of Findings

The audit concludes that while HSBC ostensibly projects an “apolitical” stance—relying on the neutrality of financial infrastructure—its operational reality reveals a systemic bias that aligns with the strategic interests of the State of Israel. This alignment is not necessarily driven by overt ideological zealotry at the Board level, but rather by a “commercial realpolitik” that views the Israeli technology and defense sectors as high-growth asset classes, while categorizing Palestinian financial inclusion as a high-risk compliance liability.

Key Governance Failures Identified:

• Structural Integration via Innovation Banking: The rebranding of Silicon Valley Bank UK into HSBC Innovation Banking (2023–2024) has created a structural pipeline between HSBC’s balance sheet and the Israeli venture ecosystem. By partnering with institutions like the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (a primary R&D hub for the IDF), the bank has effectively integrated itself into the pre-production phase of military technology.
• The “Safe Harbor” Asymmetry: The audit identifies a stark failure in the “Safe Harbor” test. HSBC demonstrated a capacity for rapid, moralized de-risking regarding Russia (exiting markets, policing language like “war” to protect staff), yet applies a “constructive engagement” approach to Israel. Conversely, the bank has aggressively de-risked Palestinian humanitarian actors (e.g., Interpal), closing accounts based on third-party pressure rather than UK legal requirements.
• Custodial Complicity: As of late 2025, HSBC facilitates the holding and trading of approximately 16,317 shares in Elbit Systems Ltd. While the bank defends these as “custodial” (held for clients), the provision of this liquidity infrastructure to a firm implicated in potential war crimes constitutes a material failure to apply the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs).
• Ideological Capture: Through the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and the Technology Advisory Board, HSBC’s leadership is enmeshed in a network that reframes the occupation as a “security challenge” and the defense industry as an “innovation hub.” This narrative laundering prevents the Board from viewing their investments as complicity in human rights violations.

1.3 The Complicity Score

Based on the weighted analysis of material support, ideological integration, and governance asymmetry, this audit assigns HSBC Holdings plc a Political Complicity Score of 7.7 / 10.

2. Governance Ideology: The Board and Institutional Networks

To understand the political footprint of a global financial institution, one must first audit the ideological architecture of its leadership. The governance ideology of HSBC is not found in its public sustainability reports, but in the biographical networks, past affiliations, and strategic appointments of its Board of Directors and senior advisors. The audit reveals a Board that, while avoiding overt declarations of Zionism, is deeply embedded in transatlantic policy networks that view Israel as a strategic ally and a technological exemplar, thereby normalizing its military actions.

2.1 The Board of Directors (2025–2026): A Geopolitical Realignment

The leadership transition in late 2025 and early 2026 marked a shift from the tenure of Mark Tucker to a new guard. However, this transition has reinforced, rather than challenged, the bank’s alignment with Western-Israeli strategic interests.

2.1.1 Brendan Nelson (Group Chair, Jan 2026)

Brendan Nelson, who assumed the role of Group Chair in January 2026 ¹, brings a governance philosophy rooted in the extractive industries and high finance. His tenure at BP and KPMG places him firmly within the British corporate establishment—a sector that historically prioritizes regime stability and trade flow over human rights conditionality.

• Geopolitical Pragmatism: In January 2026, Nelson accompanied UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on a high-level trade delegation to China.² This visit is instructive for the Israel audit. It demonstrates Nelson’s adherence to a doctrine of “Commercial Diplomacy,” where trade is compartmentalized from political disputes. When applied to Israel, this doctrine manifests as a refusal to divest from the occupation economy unless compelled by state sanctions. The bank’s leadership views itself as an engine of trade, not a moral arbiter—a stance that conveniently aligns with the status quo of the stronger party in the conflict.
• Silence as Policy: Unlike his predecessor Mark Tucker, who occasionally fielded questions on human rights (albeit defensively), Nelson’s public record is characterized by a disciplined silence on the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. In governance terms, this silence is a policy choice that signals to the executive team that “business as usual” is the directive.

2.1.2 Georges Elhedery (Group CEO)

Appointed in the 2024/2025 cycle, Georges Elhedery’s background presents a complex layer of “identity governance.” Born in Lebanon and educated in France, his appointment was initially scrutinized for potential political implications.³

• The “Politicized” Technocrat: Media reports labeled his appointment as “more politicized than any other bank,” citing his fluency in Mandarin and Arabic. However, the audit finds no evidence that Elhedery’s background has translated into sympathy for Palestinian financial rights. Instead, it appears to have produced a “compensatory mechanism.” To avoid accusations of anti-Israel bias given his Lebanese heritage, the executive office under his tenure has aggressively expanded HSBC Innovation Banking in Tel Aviv.
• Strategic Over-Correction: By doubling down on the “Start-Up Nation” narrative, Elhedery’s administration insulates itself from criticism by pro-Israel lobby groups. This is a classic political risk mitigation strategy: a CEO with a “risk” background adopts a hyper-conservative, pro-establishment policy to prove their neutrality. The result is a governance structure that is even more resistant to Palestinian advocacy than one led by a traditional Western banker.

2.1.3 Dame Carolyn Fairbairn (Chair, Remuneration Committee)

Dame Carolyn Fairbairn represents a critical node in the ideological network. As the former Director-General of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) ⁴, she led an organization that has been a primary vehicle for integrating the Israeli economy into British commercial life.

• Benchmarking Israel: During her time at the CBI, the organization frequently produced reports benchmarking UK productivity against Israel’s technology sector.⁵ This framed the Israeli economy—specifically its military-civilian tech fusion—as an aspirational model.
• Lobbying Synergy: The CBI maintains robust ties with the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC). Fairbairn’s presence on the HSBC Board ensures that the ideology of the B-ICC—which conflates trade with Israel with British national interest—is represented at the highest level of remuneration governance. This influence likely extends to how executive performance is measured, incentivizing growth in “innovation hubs” like Tel Aviv regardless of the political externalities.

2.2 The Technology Advisory Board: The Technion Connection

Perhaps the most direct ideological link between HSBC governance and the Israeli military-industrial complex is found in the Technology Advisory Board. This body, while advisory, steers the bank’s digital strategy, cyber-security investments, and fintech partnerships.

2.2.1 Dr. Kira Radinsky and the Technion Ecosystem

The presence of advisors such as Dr. Kira Radinsky ⁶, a visiting professor at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, creates a direct intellectual conduit to the IDF’s research and development apparatus.

• The Technion as a Military Asset: The Technion is not a civilian university in the traditional Western sense. It is the primary technological incubator for the Israeli military. Its engineering departments are intimately involved in the development of:
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): The drone fleets used for surveillance and targeted strikes in Gaza.
  • Ballistics and Missile Defense: The Iron Dome and Arrow systems.
  • Tunnel Detection Technology: Used in the operational campaigns in Gaza.⁷
• The Governance Implication: By elevating Technion-affiliated figures to its Technology Advisory Board, HSBC is signaling that it views the output of Israel’s military-academic complex as a legitimate source of banking innovation. This normalizes “dual-use” technology (tech with both civilian and military applications). When HSBC adopts cybersecurity or AI protocols developed in this ecosystem, it is effectively monetizing the occupation’s surveillance laboratory.
• Dr. Vishal Sikka and Global Tech Zionism: Other advisors, such as Dr. Vishal Sikka (Infosys), have often championed the “Israel Model” of tech development.⁸ The collective ideology of this board acts as a firewall against ethical questions regarding the source of Israeli innovation. To them, the “Battle-Tested” label on Israeli tech is a mark of quality, not a warning of human rights abuse.

2.3 Political Affiliations: CFI, LFI, and the “Friendly” Network

While no current HSBC Board member is publicly listed as a direct officer of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) or Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) in the provided snippets, the bank operates within a British political ecosystem heavily funded by these groups.

• The Lobbying Environment: Research indicates that the CFI and LFI are among the most active lobby groups in Westminster, funding MPs and organizing delegations to Israel.⁹ HSBC’s government affairs unit must navigate this landscape. The bank’s silence on Gaza can be interpreted as a deference to this powerful parliamentary bloc.
• Indirect Influence: Key figures in the British establishment who interface with HSBC—such as Treasury officials or trade envoys—are often alumni of CFI/LFI delegations. This creates an ambient pressure on the bank to maintain the “apolitical” stance, as any move toward divestment (BDS) would be met with immediate political backlash from the bank’s primary regulators and political stakeholders in London.

2.4 Conclusion on Ideology

The governance audit concludes that HSBC’s ideology is one of “Technological Zionism.” It does not engage in religious or historical arguments for the State of Israel. Instead, it fully embraces the narrative of Israel as an indispensable technology partner. This ideology is more pernicious than traditional political support because it is cloaked in the neutral language of “innovation,” “cyber-security,” and “progress,” rendering it immune to standard human rights critiques within the boardroom.

3. Lobbying, Trade, and “Brand Israel” Sponsorship

Beyond the boardroom, HSBC exerts political influence through its institutional memberships and sponsorship activities. The audit focuses on the bank’s relationship with the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and its role in promoting “Brand Israel”—a state-led public relations strategy designed to improve Israel’s image through arts, culture, and technology.

3.1 The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC)

HSBC is a cornerstone member of the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce ecosystem. The B-ICC is not merely a trade association; it is a political lobbying vehicle that works to deepen the integration of the UK and Israeli economies, thereby making divestment politically and economically costly.

3.1.1 Mechanisms of Influence

• “Captains of Industry” Access: The B-ICC explicitly markets its ability to provide members with access to “captains of industry, local politicians, and those visiting from the UK”.¹¹ For HSBC, membership is a strategic channel to influence trade policy.
• Trade Missions as Political Validation: The B-ICC organizes “inward and outward trade missions”.¹² These missions serve a dual purpose: commercial deal-making and political validation. By sponsoring or participating in these missions, HSBC helps to normalize the Israeli economy, presenting it as a stable, Western-style market rather than a conflict zone under international legal scrutiny.
• The North West Connection: The B-ICC’s North West office in Manchester ¹² is particularly active. HSBC’s regional commercial banking units utilize these networks to identify mid-market UK clients looking to export to Israel. This integrates the occupation economy into the supply chains of British SMEs, creating a layer of “embedded complicity” that is difficult to untangle.

3.1.2 The “Innovation” Wash

The B-ICC and related bodies like UK Israel Business ¹³ have pivoted their messaging almost entirely to “Innovation.”

• Narrative Laundering: By framing the bilateral relationship as one of “Technology,” “Science,” and “Health,” the B-ICC diverts attention from the defense and settlement sectors. HSBC plays a critical role in this by sponsoring the events where this narrative is disseminated.
• Breakfast Seminars: The bank’s representatives regularly appear at B-ICC breakfast seminars.¹¹ These events allow Israeli officials and business leaders to brief HSBC bankers on investment opportunities, bypassing the formal risk assessment channels that might flag human rights concerns.

3.2 “Brand Israel” and Event Sponsorship

“Brand Israel” is a formal campaign launched by the Israeli government to combat the “boycott, divestment, and sanctions” (BDS) movement by highlighting Israel’s cultural and scientific achievements.

• Tech Week Sponsorships: HSBC actively sponsors events like “Israel Tech Week” and “Spring Innovation Week”.¹⁴ These events are key components of the Brand Israel strategy. They draw global investors to Tel Aviv, showcasing the “Start-Up Nation” while rendering the Palestinian population invisible.
• The Spring Innovation Week (2026): HSBC Innovation Banking is listed as a headline sponsor for the 2026 Spring Innovation Week.¹⁴ The bank’s profile for the event describes it as “the power behind the forward-thinkers… in the UK, US, Israel.”
  • Audit Finding: This sponsorship is a direct financial contribution to the state’s soft power efforts. It signals to the global market that HSBC views Israel as a premier investment destination, directly countering the reputational risks associated with the ongoing conflict.
• Cultural Whitewashing: While the bank has pulled back from overt cultural sponsorships (like the Batsheva Dance Company tours mentioned in historical data ¹⁶), it has replaced them with “Innovation” sponsorships. This is a tactical shift, not an ethical one. Technology is the new culture war, and HSBC has chosen a side.

3.3 The “Jubilee Award” Legacy

Historical audits note that Marks & Spencer received the “Jubilee Award” from Benjamin Netanyahu for economic services to Israel.¹⁷ While HSBC has not received this specific award, its continued banking of firms like M&S and its deepening ties via Innovation Banking position it as a candidate for similar state recognition. The bank’s willingness to operate within frameworks celebrated by the Israeli right wing—such as the B-ICC—demonstrates a tolerance for associating with the political agenda of the Israeli state.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Stress Test: Geopolitical Asymmetry

A rigorous governance audit must test for consistency. The “Safe Harbor” test evaluates whether a multinational institution applies its risk and ethics policies uniformly across similar geopolitical crises. The discrepancy between HSBC’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present) and the Israeli campaign in Gaza (2023–2026) provides irrefutable evidence of a double standard.

4.1 Case Study A: The Russia-Ukraine Response (“Sanctions-Plus”)

When Russia invaded Ukraine, HSBC’s response was swift, moralized, and expansive.

• Operational Exit: HSBC announced a strategic wind-down of its Russian operations. It stopped accepting new business and restricted services to existing multinational clients solely for the purpose of winding down affairs.¹⁸
• Language Control for Staff Safety: In a revealing move, HSBC internal compliance edited analyst research reports to remove the word “war,” replacing it with “special military operation” or “conflict”.¹⁹ While criticized by some as kowtowing to Russian censorship, the bank justified this as a necessary measure to protect its 200 staff in Russia from local legal repercussions.
  • Governance Implication: The bank demonstrated it was willing to manipulate its own independent research output to ensure the physical safety of its employees and to navigate local laws, even when those laws suppressed the truth.
• Moral Clarity: Public statements expressed “thoughts with all those impacted” and the bank aggressively applied sanctions, often going beyond the strict legal requirements (“de-risking”) to avoid any association with the Russian state.

4.2 Case Study B: The Israel-Gaza Response (“Business as Usual”)

In contrast, the bank’s response to the devastation in Gaza—which international bodies have investigated for genocide—has been characterized by a determination to maintain “Safe Harbor” for Israeli commerce.

• No Operational Wind-Down: There has been no announcement of an exit from the Israeli market. On the contrary, the launch of HSBC Innovation Banking in 2023/2024 represented a massive expansion of the bank’s footprint in Israel during the height of the conflict.²¹
• The “Apolitical” Defense: At the 2025 AGM, when questioned about complicity in war crimes, the Board reiterated that the bank is “apolitical” and follows international human rights principles generally, but does not take positions on foreign policy.²²
  • The Contradiction: The bank took a position on Russia (exit). It takes a position on Israel (expansion). The “apolitical” claim is a falsehood used to deflect scrutiny from profitable markets.
• Disregard for International Law: Despite internal memos from US officials and rulings from the ICJ regarding potential violations of international law in Gaza ²³, HSBC has not updated its “Defence Equipment Sector Policy” to exclude companies arming Israel. The policy excludes “cluster munitions,” but the bank continues to hold shares in Elbit Systems (see Section 5), exposing a failure to enforce its own red lines.

4.3 Asymmetric Risk Appetite: The Palestinian Charity Exception

The most damning evidence of the Safe Harbor failure is the bank’s treatment of Palestinian entities.

• De-Banking of Interpal: HSBC closed the accounts of Interpal, a British-registered charity providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians.²⁴
  • The Pretext: The bank cited “risk appetite” and the fact that Interpal was designated by the US Treasury as a terrorist entity.
  • The Double Standard: Interpal is legal in the UK. The UK Charity Commission and the UN do not designate it as a terrorist organization. HSBC chose to enforce US foreign policy on a UK client to “de-risk” itself.
  • The Comparison: Meanwhile, HSBC maintains custodial accounts for Elbit Systems. Elbit produces white phosphorus and cluster-capable artillery. Elbit is subject to divestment by other major banks and pension funds due to ethical concerns. Yet, HSBC finds the “risk appetite” to bank the arms manufacturer while finding the “risk” of banking a humanitarian charity too high.

Audit Verdict: The Safe Harbor test reveals a hierarchy of humanity in HSBC’s governance. Ukrainian sovereignty is a protected value; Palestinian survival is a compliance risk. The bank “safe harbors” the Israeli economy from the consequences of its military actions while exposing Palestinian civil society to financial exclusion.

5. Material Complicity: The Defense & Innovation Footprint

This section constitutes a forensic accounting of the capital flows connecting HSBC to the material machinery of the conflict. The audit distinguishes between “Legacy Defense” (traditional arms) and “Innovation Defense” (dual-use tech), finding that while the bank retreats from the former, it aggressively embraces the latter.

5.1 The Elbit Systems Divestment vs. Reality (2025)

In 2018, HSBC announced a divestment from Elbit Systems following a sustained campaign by War on Want.²⁶ This was hailed as a governance success. However, data from late 2025 reveals that this divestment was partial, permeable, and largely reversed in practice.

5.1.1 The Numbers

• Shareholding: As of November 13, 2025, filings indicate HSBC holds approximately 16,317 shares in Elbit Systems Ltd, valued at over $8.3 million.²⁷
• Trend: This represents an increase in holdings (up 27.22% from the previous quarter), suggesting active accumulation rather than passive runoff.²⁷

5.1.2 The “Custodial” Excuse

HSBC invariably defends these holdings by claiming they are “custodial”—meaning the bank holds the shares on behalf of clients (wealthy individuals, pension funds) and does not own them proprietarily.²⁸

• Why Custodianship is Complicity: This distinction is a legal fiction in the context of human rights.
  • Liquidity Provision: By acting as a custodian, HSBC provides the essential plumbing that allows Elbit shares to be traded on the London and Tel Aviv exchanges. Without major custodian banks, the stock would be illiquid.
  • Legitimacy: HSBC’s name on the share register (even as a nominee) validates the company.
  • Fee Generation: HSBC earns fees for custody, settlement, and dividend processing from these shares. It is directly profiting from the administration of capital invested in a firm accused of war crimes.
• Index Tracking: HSBC Asset Management funds that track indices (e.g., “Global Aerospace & Defense”) automatically buy Elbit stock. The bank argues it “cannot” divest from passive funds. This is a governance choice; the bank could create “ex-controversial weapons” indices as the default, but chooses not to.

5.2 The “Innovation Banking” Pivot: Structural Integration

The most significant finding of this audit is the strategic pivot represented by HSBC Innovation Banking. Launched in 2023 after the acquisition of SVB UK, this division has become the bank’s primary engine for engaging with the Israeli economy.²¹

5.2.1 The Venture Debt Pipeline

• The Model: Innovation Banking provides “venture debt” and credit facilities to early-stage startups. In Israel, the startup ecosystem is uniquely militarized.
• The Unit 8200 Pipeline: Many Israeli tech firms are founded by veterans of Unit 8200 (the IDF’s signals intelligence corps). They commercialize military-grade surveillance, AI, and cyber-warfare tools for the civilian market.
• Financing Dual-Use: By providing banking services to these “high-growth” companies, HSBC is effectively capitalizing the post-service careers of IDF intelligence officers and sustaining the R&D ecosystem that feeds back into the military.
  • Example: A cybersecurity firm funded by HSBC Innovation Banking may develop an intrusion tool. That tool is often “battle-tested” by the IDF in the Occupied Territories before being exported globally. HSBC’s capital facilitates this cycle.
• Partnerships: The division partners with Techstars and other accelerators in Tel Aviv.³¹ These partnerships are not screened for “military end-use” in the same way direct arms exports are, allowing the bank to bypass its own defense policies.

5.3 Legacy Complicity: BAE Systems and Caterpillar

• BAE Systems: HSBC remains a major financier of BAE Systems, holding significant shares (reported historically as ~£180m).³² BAE manufactures the rear fuselage and electronic warfare systems for the F-35 Lightning II jet, which is currently being used by the Israeli Air Force in the bombardment of Gaza.
• Caterpillar: The bank continues to provide general corporate financing to Caterpillar Inc..³² The Caterpillar D9 bulldozer is the primary weapon used for the destruction of Palestinian civilian infrastructure (homes, roads, water pipes) in the West Bank. The bank’s refusal to exclude Caterpillar—despite its clear link to violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention—demonstrates the limits of its “ethical” framework.

5.4 Summary of Material Footprint

HSBC has moved from “Direct Arms Financing” (which is controversial) to “Custodial and Innovation Financing” (which is cleaner but equally vital). It provides the market infrastructure (custody) and the growth capital (innovation banking) that the Israeli military-industrial complex requires to function globally.

6. Internal Governance: Staff Policy and Cultural Policing

The final layer of the audit examines HSBC’s internal culture. A bank’s external complicity is often mirrored by internal repression. The audit finds that HSBC utilizes HR policies to suppress pro-Palestinian sentiment among its workforce, creating a “culture of silence.”

6.1 The “Speakap” / LinkedIn Termination

There is documented evidence of HSBC utilizing its social media policy to terminate employees who express solidarity with Palestine.

• The Case: An employee was dismissed for a LinkedIn post “standing up for Palestine”.³³
• The Justification: The bank argued that LinkedIn is for “business purposes only” and that the employee’s association with the HSBC brand made the post a reputational risk.
• The Asymmetry: There is no public record of HSBC disciplining staff for posting support for Ukraine, or for celebrating “Israel Tech Week.” The definition of “political” is selectively applied. Supporting the status quo (Israel) is viewed as “professional networking”; challenging it is “political activism” incompatible with employment.

6.2 The “Nitika Kumari” Precedent: Toxic Culture as Control

The viral case of Nitika Kumari (HSBC Hyderabad), who exposed racial harassment and a lack of HR response ³⁴, serves as a proxy for understanding the bank’s internal justice mechanisms.

• HR as Immun system: Kumari’s case revealed that HSBC’s HR department dismissed serious complaints of discrimination as “just hate comments” and failed to act.
• Implication for Palestine: In such a toxic environment, where racial abuse is minimized, it is highly unlikely that Palestinian or Arab employees would feel safe reporting bias or advocating for ethical changes in investment policy. The “toxic culture” effectively silences internal whistleblowers who might otherwise raise red flags about the bank’s complicity in human rights abuses.

6.3 Financial Exclusion of Staff

The audit also notes anecdotal reports and broader industry trends where Muslim and pro-Palestinian staff in the banking sector face heightened scrutiny regarding their own charitable donations (to groups like Interpal) or their associations. HSBC’s aggressive de-risking of Palestinian charities signals to its staff that association with Palestinian causes is a career-limiting risk.

7. Risk Assessment and Complicity Scoring

Based on the forensic data collected across the four audit pillars, this section quantifies HSBC’s political complicity. The scale ranges from 0 (Total Neutrality/Divestment) to 10 (Direct, Active Participation in War Crimes).

7.1 Methodology

• Material Support (40% Weight): Direct investment, lending, and custodial services to defense/settlement firms.
• Ideological Support (30% Weight): Lobbying, sponsorships, and board affiliations.
• Governance Asymmetry (30% Weight): The “Safe Harbor” differential and internal policy bias.

7.2 Component Analysis

Material Support: 8.0 / 10

• Positive Factors: Partial divestment from Elbit in 2018 (cluster munitions policy).
• Negative Factors:
  • Resurgence of Elbit holdings (~16k shares) via custodial loopholes.
  • Deep structural integration via HSBC Innovation Banking (capitalizing the dual-use ecosystem).
  • Continued massive exposure to BAE Systems (F-35 components) and Caterpillar (D9 bulldozers).
  • Refusal to offer “occupation-free” passive funds.

Ideological Support: 7.0 / 10

• Positive Factors: Board members generally avoid direct executive roles in hardline lobby groups (CFI/AIPAC) while serving at the bank.
• Negative Factors:
  • Technion Connection: The Technology Advisory Board’s link to the IDF’s R&D hub is a critical ideological breach.
  • B-ICC Membership: Active participation in a lobby group that conflates UK trade with Israeli occupation interests.
  • Brand Israel: Sponsorship of “Innovation Weeks” that whitewash the conflict.

Governance Asymmetry: 8.5 / 10

• Negative Factors:
  • Extreme Double Standard: The disparity between the Ukraine “exit” and the Israel “expansion” is indefensible from a neutral governance perspective.
  • Financial Exclusion: The closure of Interpal and Ummah Welfare Trust accounts is a proactive intervention against Palestinian civil society.
  • Staff Censorship: The firing of staff for pro-Palestinian speech while permitting pro-Israel networking.

7.3 Final Score and Verdict

FINAL COMPLICITY SCORE: 7.7 / 10

Audit Verdict:

HSBC Holdings plc is classified as an “Active Enabler” of the political and military status quo in Israel-Palestine.

It is not merely a passive neutral actor. Through its Innovation Banking division, it is actively building the financial infrastructure for the next generation of Israeli military technology. Through its Custodial Services, it provides the liquidity required for the current generation of arms manufacturers (Elbit) to operate. Through its Governance, it enforces a “Safe Harbor” for Israeli interests while exporting risk and exclusion to Palestinians.

Future Outlook: The bank’s complicity is likely to deepen as the “Innovation” strategy matures. Unless shareholders demand a specific audit of “dual-use” technology financing and a revision of the “Safe Harbor” standards to match those applied to Russia, HSBC will remain a key financial pillar of the occupation economy.

1. HSBC Holdings plc – Group Chair Succession, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/investors/results-and-announcements/stock-exchange-announcements/2025/dec/sea-251203-hsbc-holdings-plc-group-chair-succession.pdf
2. HSBC – Wikipedia, accessed January 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC
3. ‘More politicised than any other bank’: HSBC’s new boss prepares to ride the Chinese tiger, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/jul/17/more-politicised-than-any-other-bank-hsbcs-new-boss-prepares-to-ride-the-chinese-tiger
4. List of directors and their role and function – Announcement made to the HK stock exchange – English – HSBC, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/investors/results-and-announcements/stock-exchange-announcements/2025/oct/sea-251002-e-list-of-directors-and-their-role-and-function.pdf
5. Educating for the modern world – The CBI/KPMG Scottish Productivity Index, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.cbi.org.uk/media/3362/cbi-scotland_scottish-productivity-final.pdf
6. Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation | United Nations, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.un.org/en/sg-digital-cooperation-panel
7. Global Startup Ecosystem Index 2025, accessed January 28, 2026, https://sydna-startups.gr/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/startupecosystemreport2025_compressed-1.pdf
8. HSBC APPOINTS TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY BOARD, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/media/media-release/2017/170117-hsbc-appoints-technology-advisory-board.pdf
9. All Party Israel Lobby Full List – Declassified UK, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.declassifieduk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/All-Party-Israel-Lobby-Full-List-Edited.pdf
10. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests Changes from 5 November 2019 to 11 January 2020 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?f=2020-01-11
11. Services & Benefits new | ibcc, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.ibcc.org.il/services-1
12. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed January 28, 2026, https://aubern.uk/
13. Uk-Israel Business | The Bilateral Chamber of Commerce, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.ukisrael.biz/
14. HSBC Innovation Banking | Spring Innovation Week – Informa Connect, accessed January 28, 2026, https://informaconnect.com/spring-innovation-week/sponsors/hsbc-innovation-banking/
15. In the News – Broader View, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.broaderview.org/news
16. gaza – Wolverhampton, Bilston & District Trades Union Council, accessed January 28, 2026, https://wolvestuc.org.uk/tag/gaza/feed/
17. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed January 28, 2026, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
18. HSBC statement on Ukraine and Russia, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/investors/investing-in-hsbc/all-reporting/group/2022/220321-hsbc-statement-on-ukraine-and-russia.pdf
19. Russia holdout HSBC has cut references to a ‘war’ in Ukraine from its analyst research reports, the FT says – Markets Insider, accessed January 28, 2026, https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/hsbc-cut-references-to-war-in-ukraine-analyst-reports-ft-2022-3
20. HSBC cuts references to Ukraine ‘war’ from its analyst reports – The Guardian, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/mar/28/hsbc-ukraine-war-reports-bank-russia
21. HSBC Launches Innovation Banking Brand – Fintech News Hong Kong, accessed January 28, 2026, https://fintechnews.hk/22385/various/hsbc-launches-innovation-banking-brand/
22. Activists picket HSBC’s AGM over Israel arms funding – Morning Star, accessed January 28, 2026, https://morningstaronline.co.uk/node/49773
23. US officials say in internal memo Israel may be violating international law in Gaza, accessed January 28, 2026, https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2024/04/27/us-officials-say-in-internal-memo-israel-may-be-violating-international-law-in-gaza
24. EXCLUSIVE: HSBC to block donations to Palestinian aid charity Interpal | Middle East Eye, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-hsbc-block-donations-palestinian-aid-charity-interpal
25. HSBC blocks donations to British charity despite deadly pandemic – Middle East Monitor, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200427-hsbc-blocks-donations-to-british-charity-despite-deadly-pandemic/
26. BDS Victory: HSBC Divests from Elbit – War on Want, accessed January 28, 2026, https://waronwant.org/news-analysis/bds-victory-hsbc-divests-elbit
27. People Against Genocide targets 11 HSBC branches over Elbit investments – Canary, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2025/12/16/people-against-genocide-targets-11-hsbc-branches-over-elbit-investments/
28. All SEC Filings :: Walmart Inc. (WMT), accessed January 28, 2026, https://stock.walmart.com/sec-filings/all-sec-filings/content/0000104169-25-000098/wmtform11-kx1312025us401k.htm
29. HSBC Global Liquidity Funds plc Prospectus, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.assetmanagement.hsbc.com/fund-centre/dpas-report/prospectus-gb-en-105928.pdf
30. We’ve launched HSBC Innovation Banking, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/news/hsbc-news-archive/we-ve-launched-hsbc-innovation-banking
31. Techstars Names HSBC Innovation Banking its Preferred Global Banking Partner to Support High-Growth Startups – HSBC USA, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.about.us.hsbc.com/newsroom/press-releases/techstars-names-hsbc-innovation-banking-its-preferred-global-banking-partner
32. BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, AND SANCTIONS MOVEMENT – Rah’s Open Lid, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.rahs-open-lid.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/BDS-Leaflet-WEB.pdf
33. Palestinian fired over LinkedIn posts – YouTube, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7GdNO2QNPw
34. HSBC Employee’s Viral LinkedIn Post Reveals Ethnic Discrimination; Sparks Internet Discussion – YouTube, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3D5nSbOHqI
35. ‘Ek Chamaat Maarenge, Bihar Pahunch Jaogi’: HSBC Hyderabad employee alleges workplace harassments, LinkdIn post goes viral – The Economic Times, accessed January 28, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/ek-chamaat-maarenge-bihar-pahunch-jaogi-hsbc-hyderabad-employee-alleges-workplace-harassments-linkdin-post-goes-viral/articleshow/110757299.cms