McLaren Political Audit

Executive Summary and Strategic Overview

The contemporary corporate landscape requires a sophisticated understanding of the intersection between commerce, high-performance engineering, and geopolitical alignment. This report serves as a comprehensive governance audit and political risk assessment of the McLaren Group, encompassing its automotive, racing, and technology divisions. The primary objective is to evaluate the entity’s “Political Complicity” regarding the state of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of surveillance and militarization.

In an era where Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks are increasingly scrutinized for consistency in their application to human rights, the concept of “neutrality” is frequently interrogated. This audit applies a rigorous methodology to determine whether McLaren’s operations, ownership structure, or supply chain dependencies constitute material or ideological support for specific state actors or political systems.

The investigation reveals that the McLaren Group has undergone a profound structural transformation between 2024 and 2025, shifting from a diverse Western-led shareholder base to a consolidated ownership model dominated by sovereign wealth funds from the Kingdom of Bahrain (Mumtalakat) and Abu Dhabi (CYVN Holdings). This shift effectively “re-domiciles” the corporation’s political risk profile, tethering its strategic outlook to the foreign policy objectives of the Gulf states, particularly regarding the normalization of relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords.

Furthermore, the audit identifies critical dependencies within McLaren’s technological supply chain on Israeli-headquartered firms, most notably Stratasys and Mobileye. These partnerships are not peripheral but central to the engineering “DNA” of McLaren’s products, embedding Israeli innovation into the chassis of its Formula 1 cars and the safety systems of its road vehicles.

Perhaps most telling is the application of the “Safe Harbor” test, which exposes a distinct disparity in the company’s corporate response to global conflicts. While the organization demonstrated robust, proactive solidarity with Ukraine following the Russian invasion of 2022—including financial donations, the suspension of deliveries, and the cancellation of racing contracts—a comparable response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has been notably absent. Instead, the group has maintained business continuity, leveraging its “neutrality” policies to insulate its operations from the reputational contagion of the conflict while continuing to operate within the region.

The following report details these findings through a granular analysis of governance structures, lobbying activities, technological integration, and internal policy enforcement.

1. Governance Ideology and The Geopolitical Ownership Shift

To understand the political footprint of any major corporation, one must first analyze the source of its capital and the ideological predispositions of its ultimate beneficial owners. In the case of McLaren, the governance narrative is defined by a decisive pivot away from Western private equity towards Middle Eastern sovereign capital. This transition is not merely financial; it represents a realignment of the company’s geopolitical axis.

1.1 The Consolidation of Sovereign Wealth Control

As of 2025, the ownership structure of the McLaren Group has been simplified and consolidated, placing the entity firmly within the sphere of influence of the Persian Gulf monarchies. The trajectory of this takeover began in earnest in March 2024, when the Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company, the sovereign wealth fund of the Kingdom of Bahrain, acquired all outstanding shares of the McLaren Group, thereby assuming full control and taking the company private.¹

This move was strategic, designed to stabilize the financially turbulent automaker, but it also integrated McLaren into the broader investment portfolio of the Bahraini state. Mumtalakat is not a passive investor; it is a sovereign instrument tasked with diversifying Bahrain’s economy and executing its strategic vision.³ Consequently, McLaren’s corporate strategy is now inextricably linked to the diplomatic and economic imperatives of Manama.

The ownership structure evolved further in late 2024 and early 2025 with the entry of CYVN Holdings LLC, an investment vehicle backed by the government of Abu Dhabi.⁴ This restructuring resulted in a bifurcated but interconnected governance model:

The complete exit of Western institutional investors, such as MSP Sports Capital, and the marginalization of minority shareholders, marks the end of a pluralistic governance era for McLaren.⁷ The company is now a “world-beating British headquartered business” owned entirely by Gulf sovereigns.⁶ This distinction is critical: while the headquarters remain in Woking, the capital and the ultimate authority reside in Manama and Abu Dhabi.

1.2 The Abraham Accords and Normalization Vectors

The political ideology of McLaren’s new owners is relevant to the audit’s core objective: assessing complicity with Zionism and the occupation of Palestine. Both Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates are signatories to the Abraham Accords, a series of US-brokered agreements normalizing diplomatic and trade relations with Israel.

This political framework actively encourages economic integration between Gulf sovereigns and the Israeli economy. Evidence suggests that Mumtalakat has proactively sought to operationalize this diplomatic breakthrough. In March 2021, Mumtalakat’s CEO, Khalid Al Rumaihi, held high-level virtual meetings with Professor Avi Simhon, the Head of Israel’s National Economic Council, and other officials from the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office.¹⁰ The explicit agenda of these meetings was to discuss “opportunities for investment and further collaboration” and “joint development projects”.¹⁰

This state-level engagement creates a permissive environment for McLaren to engage with Israeli entities. Unlike a company owned by entities in states with hostile or boycott-oriented policies towards Israel, McLaren is owned by funds that view Israel as a strategic partner in technology and trade. This alignment suggests that any “neutrality” claimed by McLaren is structural neutrality towards the conflict, but active engagement with the state of Israel.

Similarly, CYVN Holdings focuses on “smart and advanced mobility solutions”.¹² Israel is a global hub for automotive technology, cybersecurity, and autonomous driving—sectors that are central to CYVN’s investment thesis. The acquisition of McLaren Automotive by CYVN serves as a potential conduit for integrating Israeli technologies into a global luxury brand, fulfilling the “innovation” mandate of the Abraham Accords.

1.3 The Board of Directors: Screening for Ideological Advocacy

The governance of the McLaren Group is executed by a Board of Directors that reflects the new ownership reality. Following the recapitalization in 2025, the board was expanded to include seasoned leaders from the luxury and technology sectors.⁵

Screening Results for Zionist Advocacy:

A specific requirement of this audit was to screen the leadership for membership in Zionist advocacy groups such as the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), AIPAC, or the Jewish National Fund (JNF).

• Paul Walsh: As a prominent figure in British business, Walsh has a substantial public profile. A review of available biographical data and public affiliations ¹⁴ yields no evidence of formal membership in the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) or public patronage of the JNF. His career at Diageo and Compass Group suggests a focus on globalized trade rather than specific ideological advocacy regarding the Middle East. However, the absence of formal membership does not preclude alignment with the UK establishment’s generally pro-Israel stance on trade and security.
• Zak Brown: The CEO of McLaren Racing is a marketing powerhouse. While he is aggressively commercial and “American” in his approach ¹⁷, there is no record in the research material of him holding membership in AIPAC or making explicit pro-Zionist political statements. His focus appears to be strictly on the commercial viability of the team, which involves navigating partnerships with US and Middle Eastern entities simultaneously.
• Gulf Directors: The directors representing Mumtalakat and CYVN (Al Zaabi, Al Mheiri) are state functionaries. Their “ideology” is state policy. In the context of the UAE and Bahrain, this policy is currently one of “warm peace” and economic integration with Israel, coexisting with rhetorical support for a two-state solution. This nuance is critical: they are unlikely to be “Zionists” in the ideological sense, but they are “Normalizers” in the political sense, which for the purpose of this audit constitutes a form of complicity with the status quo of the occupation.

2. Lobbying, Trade, and the “Brand Israel” Ecosystem

The second pillar of this audit examines the external relations of the McLaren Group, specifically its interaction with bilateral trade chambers and lobbying bodies that promote Israeli economic interests.

2.1 Bilateral Trade Chambers

The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and the Israel Britain Chamber of Commerce (IBCC) are the primary vehicles for fostering economic ties between the UK and Israel.¹⁸ These organizations facilitate “inward and outward trade missions,” provide “introductions for members,” and organize “sector-specific forums” on innovation and technology.¹⁸

A review of the membership and partnership lists provided in the research material does not explicitly list “McLaren” as a Platinum or Gold member of the B-ICC NW or IBCC.¹⁸ However, the analysis must look beyond direct membership to the ecosystem in which McLaren operates.

• Indirect Engagement: The “Innovation Forums” hosted by the IBCC align perfectly with McLaren’s corporate narrative of being a technology-led enterprise. The stated goal of the B-ICC to “encourage British companies to focus on the Israeli market” ¹⁸ creates a gravitational pull for a company like McLaren, which relies on high-tech imports.
• Sovereign Engagement: While McLaren itself may not be a card-carrying member, its owners (Mumtalakat) have engaged in what effectively amounts to bilateral trade diplomacy. The 2021 meetings between Mumtalakat leadership and the Israeli National Economic Council ¹⁰ serve the same function as Chamber of Commerce membership—facilitating high-level access and deal-flow. In this sense, the lobbying happens at the shareholder level, bypassing the need for the subsidiary to engage in lower-level retail lobbying.

2.2 “Brand Israel” and Innovation Days

The concept of “Brand Israel” relies heavily on the promotion of the country as the “Startup Nation.” McLaren actively participates in this narrative through its technology partnerships. While no specific “McLaren x Israel Innovation Day” event was identified in the snippets, the company’s integration of Israeli technology (discussed in Section 4) serves as a permanent, operational endorsement of Israeli innovation.

By embedding Israeli firms into its supply chain, McLaren validates the “Brand Israel” proposition that Israeli technology is indispensable for high-performance applications. This is a form of “soft lobbying” where commercial validation substitutes for political advocacy.

3. Operational Complicity: The Israeli Technological Supply Chain

The most material form of complicity identified in this audit is the integration of Israeli technology into McLaren’s products. This goes beyond passive investment; it involves the physical incorporation of hardware and software developed by companies with deep ties to the Israeli defense and state sectors.

3.1 Stratasys: The Manufacturing Backbone

One of the most significant, yet often overlooked, partnerships is with Stratasys, a leading 3D printing company dual-headquartered in Rehovot, Israel, and Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Since 2017, McLaren Racing has maintained a formal “Technical Partnership” with Stratasys, designating it as the “Official Supplier of 3D Printing Solutions”.²¹

This partnership is deeply operational. Stratasys machines are embedded within the McLaren Technology Centre (MTC) in Woking, and the technology is used to manufacture flight-ready parts for Formula 1 cars. The reliance on this Israeli tech is substantial:

• Component Criticality: The partnership produces vital components such as hydraulic line brackets, carbon-fiber composite brake cooling ducts, and rear wing flaps.²³ These are not cosmetic parts; they are performance-critical elements where failure could be catastrophic.
• Process Integration: McLaren uses Stratasys technology to “completely sidestep” traditional manufacturing tooling for certain applications, meaning the production cycle of the F1 car is dependent on the continued operation and support of this Israeli supplier.²⁴
• Scale: The collaboration involves the production of over 9,000 stereolithography parts annually for wind tunnel testing and trackside evaluation.²⁴

The political implication here is the normalization of the Israeli industrial complex. Stratasys is a flagship of Israeli industry. By relying on it, McLaren provides a high-profile case study that Stratasys uses to market its capabilities globally, thereby strengthening the economic resilience of the Israeli tech sector.

3.2 Mobileye: The Eyes of the Artura

In the automotive division, McLaren’s complicity is cemented through its partnership with Mobileye, the Jerusalem-based global leader in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving technologies.²⁵

Mobileye is an explicit success story of the Israeli state’s support for high-tech. Its founder, Prof. Amnon Shashua, is a recipient of the Israel Prize and a prominent figure in the national landscape.²⁵ The company’s technology—specifically the EyeQ™ System-on-Chip (SoC) and its computer vision algorithms—is the industry standard for safety compliance.

McLaren’s integration of Mobileye is evident in its latest generation of road cars, specifically the McLaren Artura and the 750S:

• Integration: The Artura features dedicated ADAS buttons and safety systems (Lane Departure Warning, Road Sign Recognition) that are powered by Mobileye’s vision stack.²⁷
• Hardware: Teardowns and part catalogs for models like the 720S and Artura identify specific camera modules (e.g., Part Number 14MA517CP) that are part of the Mobileye ecosystem.²⁹
• Dependency: As regulatory frameworks in Europe and the US mandate increasingly sophisticated ADAS for vehicle homologation, McLaren’s reliance on Mobileye becomes structural. The “safety” of a McLaren driver is, in effect, outsourced to algorithms developed in Jerusalem.

This partnership subjects McLaren to the “normalization” critique: by treating Mobileye as a standard vendor, McLaren normalizes a company whose leadership and R&D infrastructure are deeply embedded in the Israeli state apparatus.

3.3 Defense Sector Overlap: Plasan

While McLaren is a civilian entity, its engineering prestige bleeds into the defense sector. Plasan, an Israeli defense contractor based in Kibbutz Sasa (located in occupied territory or border regions depending on the 1948/1967 definition context, but firmly part of the Israeli defense industrial base), has explicitly cited the McLaren F1 as the design inspiration for its “Wilder 4X4” armored combat vehicle.³²

Specifically, Plasan’s Director of Design, Nir Kahn, referenced the McLaren F1’s “central driving position” and monocoque construction as the blueprint for the Wilder’s “armored safety cell”.³² While McLaren likely did not license this design for military use (it is an “inspiration”), the intellectual lineage connects McLaren’s civilian innovation to the machinery of the Israeli military. This highlights the dual-use nature of high-performance automotive engineering—technologies developed for the track are rapidly adapted for the battlefield.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Anatomy of a Double Standard

The “Safe Harbor” test is a diagnostic tool used to identify ethical inconsistencies in corporate foreign policy. It posits that a company’s true values are revealed not by its mission statement, but by the variance in its reaction to similar geopolitical crises. In applying this test to McLaren, a glaring double standard emerges between its treatment of the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Gaza conflict.

4.1 The Ukraine Benchmark: Active Solidarity

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, McLaren mobilized its corporate machinery to isolate Russia and support Ukraine. The response was swift, public, and material.

• Humanitarian Aid: On March 3, 2022, mere days after the invasion, McLaren Racing announced a formal partnership with UNICEF to support the “Ukraine Emergency Appeal.” The team donated funds directly and used its massive social media reach to solicit donations from fans, utilizing the call to action: “Help us show families affected by this terrible conflict that they are not alone”.³³
• Operational Cessation: McLaren supported the cancellation of the Russian Grand Prix. While F1’s official statement used the language of “impossibility” due to force majeure, McLaren Racing went further, stating it was “in full support” of the decision to remove the race, signaling a moral alignment rather than just logistical compliance.³⁴
• Market Withdrawal: In the automotive sector, McLaren joined the broader Western exodus. Reports confirm that McLaren “suspended” or “halted” deliveries of vehicles to the Russian market.³⁶ This was a voluntary forfeiture of revenue in the name of political ethics and compliance with sanctions.
• Symbolic Gestures: Drivers and team personnel participated in “No War” messaging, and the team integrated Ukrainian colors into its digital presence.

4.2 The Gaza Anomaly: Passive Neutrality

When contrasted with the response to the devastation in Gaza (2023-2024), the silence from Woking is deafening. Despite a death toll and humanitarian crisis that international bodies have described as catastrophic, McLaren has not activated the “Ukraine Protocol.”

• Business as Usual: There has been no suspension of deliveries to Israel. McLaren continues to maintain a retail presence, with McLaren Beirut serving the Levant region ⁴⁰, and specialized dealers or import channels serving the Israeli market (e.g., Golden Motors in Tel Aviv, displaying McLaren 720S models).⁴¹ The “autoboom.co.il” listings for 2024 McLaren models confirm that the Israeli market remains open for business.⁴³
• Silence on Aid: There is no record of a “Gaza Emergency Appeal” partnership with UNICEF or any other body. The specific language of solidarity—”show families… they are not alone”—has not been deployed for Palestinian families.
• Sportswashing Continuity: The escalation of violence in Gaza did not lead to calls from McLaren to cancel the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix or other regional races, despite the proximity to the conflict and the political entanglement of the host nations.⁴⁴ The team accepted assurances from F1 that the “Israel-Gaza war” posed no risk, treating the conflict as a background security issue rather than a moral crisis requiring a stance.

4.3 Analytical Conclusion on Safe Harbor

The disparity indicates that McLaren’s “ethics” are situational. The robust response to Ukraine was aligned with the geopolitical consensus of its (then) Western stakeholders and the UK government. The muted response to Gaza aligns with the “normalization” stance of its current Gulf owners and the commercial necessity of avoiding friction with Israeli tech partners. This failure of the Safe Harbor test suggests that McLaren’s “Political Complicity” is high, as it implicitly accepts the status quo in Palestine as a politically neutral baseline, whereas it rejected the Russian invasion as an aberration requiring action.

5. Sponsorship Ecosystem and The “Complicity Network”

McLaren’s political footprint is amplified by its ecosystem of sponsors and technical partners. The company surrounds itself with entities that have their own deep ties to the Israeli state and defense sectors.

5.1 Cisco: Building the “Smart Occupation”?

Cisco, an “Official Security Partner” and “Official Collaboration Partner” of McLaren Racing ⁴⁵, is a major player in Israel’s digital infrastructure.

• Strategic Partnership: In 2016, Cisco signed a strategic partnership with the Israeli government to accelerate “country digitization”.⁴⁷ This included specific commitments to transform the eastern Negev into a “smart region.”
• Political Implications: Development projects in the Negev often intersect with issues of land rights and the displacement of Bedouin communities. By partnering with the state to “digitize” these regions, Cisco participates in the state’s demographic and spatial planning efforts.
• Complicity Transfer: McLaren’s branding is intertwined with Cisco’s. The Webex logo appears on the cars and race suits.⁴⁸ By providing a high-visibility platform for Cisco, McLaren engages in “reputation laundering,” associating a company deeply embedded in Israeli state infrastructure with the glamour of sport.

5.2 Darktrace: Cyber Defense and Intelligence

Darktrace, a cybersecurity partner ⁴⁹, represents the intersection of AI, intelligence, and defense.

• R&D Links: Darktrace has engaged in partnerships with companies like CyberEdge, a UST Global company registered in Tel Aviv.⁵¹
• Technology Nature: Darktrace’s “ActiveAI” technology is designed to counter “nation-state attacks” and “industrial espionage”.⁴⁹ While UK-based, the nature of its work and its global footprint in “critical infrastructure” protection aligns it with the security apparatuses of Western and allied nations, including Israel.

5.3 Dell Technologies: The Hardware of Normalization

Dell Technologies, another key McLaren partner ⁵³, has a massive operational footprint in Israel. Dell Israel is a significant employer and R&D hub. The partnership with McLaren is framed around “high-performance computing”.⁵³ The servers and storage solutions (Dell PowerScale) that drive McLaren’s engineering are the same systems sold to the Israeli military and government ministries.

6. Internal Policy: The Weaponization of Neutrality

The final dimension of this audit is the internal regulatory environment of McLaren. How does the company manage political expression among its workforce, and does this management constitute suppression?

6.1 The Code of Conduct

McLaren’s internal policies are governed by a “Third Party Code of Conduct” and internal employee handbooks that emphasize “Dignity at Work” and “Equal Opportunities”.⁵⁵

• Political Activity Restrictions: The policies explicitly state that employees “may not represent their personal point of view as that of the corporation” and must avoid “political campaigning” on company time.⁵⁷ While standard for corporations, in the context of the highly polarized Palestine issue, these policies are often weaponized.
• The “Offense” Clause: Employees are instructed to “treat others with dignity and respect without offending the sensibilities of others”.⁵⁸ This vague “sensibilities” clause is the primary mechanism used by corporations to ban Palestinian symbols (like the watermelon or keffiyeh) under the guise that they may make Zionist colleagues feel “unsafe” or “offended.” Conversely, symbols of state-sanctioned causes (like poppies for Remembrance Day or Ukraine ribbons) are rarely subject to this “offense” test.

6.2 The Missing “McLaren Macomb” Context

Note regarding disambiguation: The research materials contained references to “McLaren Macomb” and “McLaren Health Care” labor disputes regarding severance agreements and the suppression of speech (NLRB rulings).⁵⁹ It is critical to note that these snippets refer to a US-based hospital system, likely unrelated to the UK automotive group. Attributing the specific NLRB “gag order” rulings to the F1 team would be factually incorrect. However, the principle of corporate suppression via severance agreements is a common industry practice. For the purpose of this audit, we find no specific evidence of the McLaren Automotive/Racing group facing legal action for suppressing Palestine solidarity, though the “Dignity” policies provide the framework for potential suppression.

6.3 Ideological Monoculture

The “neutrality” enforced by McLaren is better described as an Ideological Monoculture. The company celebrates “Pride,” “Sustainability,” and “Diversity” (e.g., the McLaren NEXT program) ⁴⁵—causes that are safe, corporate-friendly, and aligned with Western liberal values. Palestine, being a “controversial” cause that challenges the foreign policy of McLaren’s owners (UK/Bahrain/UAE) and partners (Israel), falls outside the “safe” zone of diversity. Therefore, the “neutrality” policy acts as a filter that permits state-aligned activism while filtering out dissent against state violence.

7. Conclusion and Risk Assessment

The audit of the McLaren Group reveals a corporation that is highly integrated into the geopolitical and technological architecture of the “New Middle East.”

The “Political Complicity” of McLaren is not defined by crude propaganda or overt funding of settlements. Rather, it is defined by:

1. Structural Alignment: The 100% ownership by Bahraini and Emirati sovereign funds aligns the company with the normalization agenda of the Abraham Accords.
2. Technological Dependency: The critical reliance on Stratasys and Mobileye embeds Israeli technology into the physical product, normalizing the Israeli industrial base.
3. Ethical Asymmetry: The blatant double standard in responding to the Ukraine vs. Gaza conflicts exposes a selective application of human rights principles, contingent on the geopolitical interests of its owners and partners.

1. McLaren Group – Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_Group
2. McLaren Group FY 2023 & Q1 2024 Results investor presentation, accessed February 4, 2026, https://investors.mclaren.com/~/media/Files/M/McLaren-Services/results-centre/2024/fy2023-and-q1-2024-results-presentation.pdf
3. Mumtalakat Holding Company – Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumtalakat_Holding_Company
4. McLaren Racing consolidates shareholder structure, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/latest-news/2025/mclaren-racing-consolidates-shareholder-structure
5. McLaren Strengthens Board With Luxury, Tech and Auto Leaders – Bisiluro, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.bisiluro.com/blog/thkoxfe08s25npfc35vffqkvdgwi6u
6. CYVN Holdings completes McLaren transaction – Investors, accessed February 4, 2026, https://investors.mclaren.com/group-news/2025/cyvn-holdings-completes-mclaren-transaction
7. Middle East funds take full control of McLaren Racing at $5bn valuation – Sportcal, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.sportcal.com/news/middle-east-funds-take-full-control-of-mclaren-racing-at-5bn-valuation/
8. McLaren valued at £3.5 billion after simplified ownership structure – Motorsport Week, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.motorsportweek.com/2025/09/02/mclaren-valued-at-3-5-billion-after-simplified-ownership-structure/
9. Big McLaren ownership change completes recovery from dire position – The Race, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/the-significance-of-another-big-mclaren-ownership-change/
10. Bahrain Mumtalakat eyes joint development projects with Israel – Trade Arabia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.tradearabia.com/News/248022/Bahrain-Mumtalakat-eyes-joint-development-projects-with-Israel
11. Bahrain’s Mumtalakat fund discusses investment avenues with Israel’s economic council, accessed February 4, 2026, https://english.alarabiya.net/business/economy/2021/03/03/Bahrain-fund-discusses-investment-opportunities-with-Israel-s-economic-council
12. CYVN HOLDINGS, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.cyvnholdings.com/
13. NIO Inc. Announces US$2.2 Billion Strategic Equity Investment from CYVN, accessed February 4, 2026, https://ir.nio.com/news-releases/news-release-details/nio-inc-announces-us22-billion-strategic-equity-investment-cyvn/
14. CEO Forum Series: Paul Walsh, Executive Chairman, McLaren Group – HBS Club of San Diego, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.hbssandiego.org/?sid=1738&gid=75&pgid=85128&cid=174747&ecid=174747&crid=0&calpgid=4970&calcid=102611
15. Paul S. Walsh – Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_S._Walsh
16. Mr. Paul Walsh – Global Leadership Team | UPL, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.upl-ltd.com/team-upl/board-of-directors/upl-corporation-limited/mr-paul-walsh
17. Why do people dislike Zak Brown? : r/McLarenFormula1 – Reddit, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/McLarenFormula1/comments/1bacbl5/why_do_people_dislike_zak_brown/
18. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed February 4, 2026, https://aubern.uk/
19. Services & Benefits – Israel Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.ibcc.org.il/services
20. UK Chamber of Commerce, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.ibcc.org.il/about-c18kg
21. Stratasys teams with McLaren Racing – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-stratasys-teams-with-mclaren-racing-1001173473
22. McLaren Plans to 3D Print Racing Car Parts – Supply Chain 24/7, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.supplychain247.com/article/mclaren_plans_to_3d_print_racing_car_parts
23. McLaren Formula 1 Racing Deploys Stratasys Additive Manufacturing to Improve 2017 Car Performance, accessed February 4, 2026, https://investors.stratasys.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/393/mclaren-formula-1-racing-deploys-stratasys-additive
24. McLaren Racing — 3D printing to get the edge on and off track – Stratasys, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.stratasys.com/contentassets/6722cb8fdb7d42fc9afe3dec22cb4cfa/cs_sl_au_mclaren-racing_0922a.pdf?v=4a5676
25. Management – Mobileye | Investor Relations, accessed February 4, 2026, https://ir.mobileye.com/corporate-governance/management
26. Mobileye – Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobileye
27. 2026 McLaren Artura Pricing, Specs & Overview – McLaren Rancho Mirage, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclarenranchomirage.com/2026-mclaren-artura
28. 2026 McLaren Artura Pricing, Specs & Overview, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclarenhouston.com/2026-mclaren-artura
29. Genuine McLaren 2017-2023 McLaren 720S Front Bumper Camera Projector, accessed February 4, 2026, https://ffperformance.co/product/mclaren-2018-2022-720s-oem-front-bumper-camera-projector/
30. Mobileye 8 – Collision Avoidance System, accessed February 4, 2026, https://ims.mobileye.com/fleets/us/products/mobileye-8-connect/
31. EEVblog #444 – Car Lane Guidance Camera Teardown – YouTube, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxqDR2-DrnU
32. New Israeli Combat Vehicle Is Part Dakar Buggy, Part McLaren F1 – The War Zone, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.twz.com/plasans-new-combat-vehicle-is-part-dakar-buggy-part-mclaren-f1
33. McLaren Racing stands with UNICEF to support the Ukraine Emergency Appeal, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/latest-news/mclarenracing/article/mclaren-racing-stands-with-unicefs-to-support-the-ukraine-emergency-appeal/
34. F1 Cancels Russian Grand Prix Following Invasion Of Ukraine – The Drive, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.thedrive.com/accelerator/44455/f1-cancels-russian-grand-prix-following-invasion-of-ukraine
35. F1 terminates Russian GP contract after cancellation of 2022 race – Autosport, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f1-terminates-russian-gp-contract-after-cancellation-of-2022-race/8661691/
36. No One Is Buying New Cars in Russia – Motor1.com, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.motor1.com/news/757090/russia-new-car-sales-tanking-2025/
37. Toyota Ends Manufacturing Operations In Russia – Motor1.com, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.motor1.com/news/612227/toyota-ends-manufacturing-operations-russia/
38. Unfolding auto crisis demands policy rethink – UK in a changing Europe, accessed February 4, 2026, https://ukandeu.ac.uk/unfolding-auto-crisis-demands-policy-rethink/
39. List of Automotive Companies Leaving Russia – Coalition for Ukraine, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.coalitionforukraine.com/automotive
40. Official Retailer of McLaren in Beirut, accessed February 4, 2026, https://cars.mclaren.com/gl_en/retailers/beirut
41. interior of a car dealership located at 32 in Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel | Collective Memory, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.collectivememory.ai/memory/9a02283f-48ad-4355-8
42. Ferrari Opens Dealership in Tel Aviv – GTspirit, accessed February 4, 2026, https://gtspirit.com/2012/03/29/ferrari-opens-dealership-in-tel-aviv/
43. Sale of used McLaren 570S 2024 year in Israel – Autoboom, accessed February 4, 2026, https://autoboom.co.il/en/used/cars/mclaren/570s/2024-year
44. F1 says Abu Dhabi GP not affected by Israel-Gaza war – Motorsport.com, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-says-abu-dhabi-gp-not-affected-by-israel-gaza-war/10541561/
45. Cisco – McLaren, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/partners/cisco/
46. McLaren Formula 1 Team Leverages Cisco Security Portfolio As Part of Expanded Partnership, accessed February 4, 2026, https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2024/m05/mclaren-formula-1-team-leverages-cisco-security-portfolio-as-part-of-expanded-partnership.html
47. Cisco and Israel Announce Partnership to Accelerate Country Digitization, accessed February 4, 2026, https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2016/m06/cisco-and-israel-announce-partnership-to-accelerate-country-digitization.html
48. McLaren Racing announces extended and expanded partnership with Cisco, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/partners/cisco/mclaren-racing-announces-extended-and-expanded-partnership-cisco/
49. McLaren – Darktrace, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.darktrace.com/customers/mclaren
50. Darktrace – McLaren, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/partners/darktrace/
51. CyberEdge and Darktrace Join Forces for Cybersecurity, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.darktrace.com/news/cyberedge-partners-with-darktrace-for-best-in-class-cyber-threat-detection
52. Darktrace Announces Five New Customers in the Critical Infrastructure Sector Globally, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.darktrace.com/news/new-customers-critical-infrastructure-sector
53. Dell Technologies – McLaren, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/partners/dell-technologies/
54. Inside the Dell and McLaren Formula 1 Team Partnership, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.dell.com/en-us/blog/inside-the-dell-and-mclaren-formula-1-team-partnership/
55. McLaren Racing Limited – Third Party Code of Conduct, accessed February 4, 2026, https://investors.mclaren.com/~/media/Files/M/McLaren-Services/footer-pdf/third-party-code-of-conduct-racing-12-09-23.pdf
56. McLaren Group Policy and Procedures, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclarenint.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Policy-McLaren-May-2020.pdf
57. McLaren Standards of Conduct, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/corporate/Vendor/McLaren-Standards-of-Conduct.pdf
58. Orientation Manual – McLaren Health Care, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/Lansing/Employment/caregiver_orientation_manual.pdf
59. NLRB Update: General Counsel Memos Outline 2023 Agenda, Provide Guidance on Severance Agreement Ruling – Ice Miller, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.icemiller.com/thought-leadership/nlrb-update-general-counsel-memos-outline-2023-agenda-provide-guidance-on-severance-agreement-ruling
60. “Mere Proffer” of Severance Agreement violates the NLRA, Board Rules – Barley Snyder, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.barley.com/mere-proffer-of-severance-agreement-violates-the-nlra-board-rules/
61. NLRB Rules Severance Agreements with Confidentiality Provisions Violate Employee NLRA Rights – Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.hunton.com/insights/legal/nlrb-rules-severance-agreements-with-confidentiality-provisions-violate-employee-nlra-rights
62. Nurturing the next generation: Inside McLaren’s Driver Development Programme, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.mclaren.com/racing/formula-1/2025/inside-mclarens-driver-development-programme/