Superdrug Political Audit

1. Executive Strategic Assessment

1.1 Audit Scope and Complicity Determination

This comprehensive audit evaluates the political and ideological footprint of Superdrug Stores plc, a ubiquitous presence on the British high street, to determine its level of complicity in the occupation of Palestinian territories and the maintenance of Israeli state infrastructure. While Superdrug operates as a distinct retail brand within the United Kingdom, focusing on health and beauty markets, this investigation posits that its corporate governance, capital flows, and ultimate beneficial ownership cannot be decoupled from the geopolitical activities of its parent conglomerate, CK Hutchison Holdings.

The audit framework utilizes a “Complicity Scale” ranging from None to Upper-Extreme, analyzing three distinct layers of corporate activity:

1. Direct Retail Complicity: The stocking and sale of goods produced in illegal settlements in the Occupied West Bank.
2. Strategic State-Building (Parent Level): The development of critical national infrastructure (CNI) within Israel—specifically water desalination and hydroelectric power—that fortifies the state’s resilience and resource dominance.
3. Ideological & Academic Support: Philanthropic capital injections into Israeli academic institutions deeply integrated with the military-industrial complex.

Preliminary Rating: Based on the evidence consolidated in this report, Superdrug Stores plc is assigned a complicity rating of High, escalating to Upper-Extreme at the ultimate beneficiary owner (UBO) level.

The rationale for this rating is threefold. First, the retailer persists in trading with Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories, a company whose primary manufacturing operations are located in an illegal West Bank settlement, constituting a direct violation of international consensus on the pillage of occupied natural resources. Second, the parent entity, CK Hutchison, has acted as a primary architect of Israel’s water security strategy, neutralizing the strategic vulnerability of water scarcity through the development of the Sorek desalination plant and the ongoing Kochav Hayarden hydroelectric project. Third, the Li Ka Shing Foundation’s $130 million endowment to the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology represents a massive transfer of wealth to an institution that functions as the R&D engine for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).

1.2 The “Safe Harbor” Asymmetry

A critical component of this audit is the “Safe Harbor” test—an analysis of how the entity responds to geopolitical crises. The investigation reveals a stark asymmetry in Superdrug’s corporate response mechanisms. While the conflict in Ukraine triggered clear, politically framed risk assessments and swift supply chain adjustments, the ongoing crisis in Gaza and the broader occupation are met with ambiguous language referring to “conflict in the Middle East.” This “neutrality” is effectively negated by the active commercial decision to maintain settlement goods in the supply chain, suggesting that the company’s governance framework prioritizes commercial continuity with Israel over the ethical and legal risks associated with occupation economies.

1.3 Key Risk Indicators

2. Corporate Architecture and Ultimate Beneficial Ownership

To understand the political weight of a tube of toothpaste sold in Croydon, one must trace the equity upwards to Hong Kong. Superdrug is not an independent actor; it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of A.S. Watson Group, which is in turn the retail division of the massive conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings. This vertical integration means that profits generated by Superdrug contribute to the balance sheet of a holding company that has historically viewed Israel not just as a market, but as a strategic partner in technology and infrastructure.

2.1 The Li Family Dynasty and Geopolitical Alignment

The strategic direction of the group is defined by the Li family: Li Ka-shing (Senior Advisor) and his son Victor Li Tzar-kuoi (Chairman and Group Co-Managing Director).

Victor Li Tzar-kuoi currently sits at the apex of the governance structure.¹⁰ His tenure has been marked by a continuation of his father’s “East-West” pivot, where the group maintains heavy asset bases in Europe (telecoms, ports, retail) while fostering deep technological ties with Israel. Unlike many Western multinationals that view Israel through a lens of reputational risk, the Li family has historically viewed it through a lens of technological extraction and infrastructure development.

The “political footprint” here is not necessarily one of ideological Zionism in the Western Christian or Jewish sense (membership in groups like CFI or AIPAC), but rather Strategic Zionism—the belief that the Israeli state’s survival and technological output are vital interests for the conglomerate’s global competitive edge. This is evidenced by the sheer scale of investment in immovable assets (desalination plants, power stations) which predicate a long-term bet on the stability and permanence of the Israeli regime.

2.2 The Governance Nexus: Dr. Dan Eldar

A governance audit of the Board of Directors reveals a critical “human bridge” between the UK/Hong Kong corporate sphere and the operational realities of the Israeli state. This link is Dr. Dan Eldar.

Dr. Eldar’s role is pivotal. He is not a distant investor; he is an operational executive embedded in the Israeli infrastructure sector.

• HUTCHMED Role: In May 2024, Dr. Eldar was appointed Chairman of HUTCHMED, the group’s biopharmaceutical subsidiary listed on the London Stock Exchange (AIM) and NASDAQ.³ This places him in a supreme governance role over a UK-listed entity.
• Hutchison Water Role: Simultaneously, he serves as an Executive Director of Hutchison Water Israel Ltd.⁴ This entity is responsible for the group’s massive water and energy projects within Israel.
• Implications: Dr. Eldar’s dual mandate signifies that the strategic planning of the group is fully integrated. The same governance structure that oversees cancer drug development in the UK oversees the construction of hydroelectric power plants in the Jordan Valley. His background is explicitly political and administrative, holding a PhD in Government from Harvard and degrees in Public Administration from Hebrew University.³ This academic and professional profile suggests a sophisticated understanding of the intersection between state administration and private infrastructure—expertise that is directly applied to the group’s activities in Israel.

2.3 The “Conservative Friends of Israel” (CFI) Screening

The audit screened the leadership for membership in Zionist advocacy groups.

• Findings: While no direct membership card for CFI was found for the current Superdrug CEO Peter Macnab or the UK-based directors, the political donation patterns of the ultimate parent’s sphere of influence are notable.
• Indirect Influence: Research indicates that the broader “Israel Lobby” in the UK, including CFI, operates by cultivating relationships with corporate leaders. While direct donations from Victor Li to CFI were not identified in the snippets, the group’s business interests align closely with the pro-Israel trade agenda championed by CFI parliamentarians. The “political complicity” here is likely executed through trade associations and “Innovation Partnerships” rather than direct cash-for-access schemes, which are more heavily regulated in the UK.

3. Strategic Infrastructure and State-Building Complicity

The most profound form of complicity identified in this audit is State-Building. This refers to corporate activities that provide the essential utilities and infrastructure required for a state to function, expand, and maintain its military and civilian occupation capabilities. CK Hutchison, through its subsidiary Hutchison Water, has been instrumental in securing two of Israel’s most critical existential resources: Water and Energy.

3.1 Water Security: The Desalination Hegemony

Water is a strategic weapon in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Control over the mountain aquifer and the Jordan River basin allows Israel to dictate the economic viability of Palestinian agriculture. To bypass the limits of natural water sources and secure supply for its population (and settlements), Israel embarked on a massive desalination strategy.

The Sorek Desalination Plant (Sorek A):

• Project Scope: Hutchison Water, in a consortium with IDE Technologies, constructed the Sorek Desalination Plant, which became operational in 2013.¹¹ At the time, it was the largest seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant in the world.
• Strategic Impact: Sorek produces ~150 million cubic meters of water annually, accounting for approximately 20% of Israel’s municipal water demand.¹²
• Complicity Analysis: By building and operating this plant, CK Hutchison helped “drought-proof” the Israeli state. This technological fix reduced the pressure on Israel to share natural water resources with Palestinians. It allowed the state to maintain unrestricted water flows to settlements in the West Bank even during regional droughts, while Palestinian communities faced rationing.
• Divestment Status: In 2018/2019, Hutchison sold its stake in Sorek A to Dan Capital.¹³ This sale was mandated by Israeli antitrust authorities to allow Hutchison to bid for the new “Sorek B” tender (a bid they eventually lost due to US pressure regarding Chinese involvement).¹⁴
• Legacy: Although the asset is sold, the complicity is historical and foundational. The plant exists because CK Hutchison financed and built it. The state’s current water resilience is a direct product of that investment.

3.2 Energy Security: The Kochav Hayarden Project

While Sorek is a past project, Kochav Hayarden represents active, ongoing complicity.

• The Asset: A 344MW pumped storage hydroelectric power plant located near the Jordan Valley in Northern Israel.⁵
• Mechanism: Pumped storage acts as a giant battery for the national grid. It pumps water up to a reservoir when energy is cheap (night) and releases it to generate power when demand is high (day).
• Strategic Value: This facility is critical for the stability of the Israeli national grid, particularly as it integrates renewable energy. A stable grid is a prerequisite for a modern industrial and military economy.
• Timeline: Construction has been ongoing for several years, with commercial operations projected to commence around 2027.
• Parent Involvement: The project is being developed by Hutchison Water Israel. This confirms that the group is not “exiting” Israel but is rather pivoting to different forms of critical infrastructure. This is a long-term commitment (20+ years of operation) to the stability of the Israeli regime.

3.3 Hutchison Kinrot: The Normalization of Technology

In 2012, Hutchison Water acquired Kinrot Ventures, a government-franchised technology incubator.¹⁵ Rebranded as Hutchison Kinrot, this entity operates from Netanya and functions as a venture capital arm specializing in water and cleantech.

• The Mechanism of Normalization: Hutchison Kinrot takes early-stage Israeli technology—often developed by veterans of IDF intelligence units (Unit 8200) who transition into the tech sector—and provides them with capital and a global pathway to market.
• Portfolio Examples:
  • TripleW: A company turning food waste into bioplastics.⁹
  • HydroSpin: Generating energy from water flow in municipal pipes.¹⁶
  • Aquarius Spectrum: Acoustic leak detection for water networks.¹⁷
• Ideological Function: By integrating these companies into the global supply chain of A.S. Watson and CK Hutchison, the group actively works to defeat the BDS movement’s goal of economic isolation. They turn “Israeli Tech” into “Global Tech,” erasing the political origin of the innovation. This is a form of “economic normalization” that is highly valuable to the Israeli state diplomatic strategy.

4. Ideological Philanthropy: The Technion Endowment

While infrastructure builds the body of the state, philanthropy builds its mind. The audit identified a critical flow of capital from the Li family to the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.

4.1 The $130 Million Grant

In 2013, the Li Ka Shing Foundation donated $130 million to the Technion.⁶

• Scale: This was one of the largest single donations in the history of Israeli higher education.
• Purpose: The funds were used to strengthen the Technion’s Haifa campus and to establish the Guangdong-Technion Israel Institute of Technology (GTIIT) in China.

4.2 The Technion and Military R&D

To understand why this donation constitutes “Political Complicity” in militarization, one must analyze the Technion’s role in the Israeli military-industrial complex. The Technion is not a civilian ivory tower; it is the primary research engine for the IDF and Israel’s defense contractors (Elbit, Rafael, IAI).

• Drone Technology: The Technion has been instrumental in the development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used for surveillance and targeted strikes in Gaza and the West Bank.
• The D9 Bulldozer: Technion researchers were involved in the development of the remote-controlled “Thunder of Dawn” D9 bulldozer, a vehicle heavily used in the demolition of Palestinian homes and infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza.
• Surveillance Algorithms: The institute develops advanced computer vision and AI algorithms that are integrated into Israel’s surveillance apparatus, including the facial recognition systems used at checkpoints.
• Defense Partnerships: The Technion maintains strategic partnerships with Elbit Systems (Israel’s largest arms manufacturer) and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.

4.3 Assessment of Complicity

By endowing the Technion with $130 million, the Li Ka Shing Foundation—and by extension the controlling family of Superdrug—provided massive material support to the institution most responsible for maintaining Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge (QME). This capital allows the Technion to attract talent, build labs, and develop the next generation of dual-use technologies that will eventually be deployed in the occupation. This is Upper-Extreme ideological and material support.

5. Direct Retail Complicity: The Supply Chain Audit

While the parent company engages in high-level state-building, Superdrug’s own operations are implicated at the retail level. The “Supply Chain” is the primary interface where the company’s stated ethics collide with the reality of occupation economics.

5.1 The “Ahava” Violation

The audit confirms that Superdrug continues to stock and sell products from Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories.¹

• Provenance: Ahava’s primary manufacturing facility, visitor center, and research labs are located in Mitzpe Shalem.
• Status of Location: Mitzpe Shalem is an Israeli settlement located in the Occupied West Bank. Under international law (Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49), the establishment of settlements in occupied territory is illegal.
• Resource Pillage: The mud and minerals used in Ahava products are extracted from the shores of the Dead Sea within the occupied territory. The Hague Regulations (1907), specifically Article 55, forbid an occupying power from exploiting the natural resources of an occupied territory for private economic gain or for the benefit of the occupying power’s domestic economy. This act is legally defined as pillage.
• The “Made in Israel” Fraud: Ahava products are typically labeled “Made in Israel.” However, the UK government (DEFRA) and the European Union have issued guidelines stating that goods from West Bank settlements should not be labeled as “Israel” since the settlements are not part of the sovereign territory of Israel. By selling these products without clear distinction, Superdrug is arguably complicit in consumer deception regarding the origin of goods.

5.2 The “Malki” Ambiguity

The audit also identified the brand Malki (Dead Sea products) in Superdrug’s inventory.²¹

• Risk Assessment: Malki is often a family-run business. While they also use Dead Sea minerals, the key compliance question is where the extraction takes place. If the extraction occurs at the southern end of the Dead Sea (within pre-1967 Israel borders), it is less legally contentious than Ahava’s extraction in the occupied north. However, without a specific audit of Malki’s extraction licenses, the brand represents a High Risk of being linked to the same extractive economy as Ahava.

5.3 Own-Brand “Dead Sea” Products

Superdrug sells own-brand products containing Dead Sea minerals (e.g., bath salts, masks).

• Supply Chain Opacity: Superdrug sources own-brand products from over 80 suppliers.²² The origin of the raw mineral ingredients is critical. If Superdrug’s own-brand supply chain purchases bulk mud/salt from Israeli suppliers operating in the West Bank (such as Dead Sea Works or smaller contractors in the Megilot region), then Superdrug is directly importing pillaged resources under its own name.
• Recommendation: This is a critical area for future auditing. A demand must be made for the “Bill of Lading” and “Certificate of Origin” for the raw mineral ingredients in Superdrug’s own-brand Dead Sea range.

5.4 Brand Israel and Trade Innovation

Superdrug’s parent, A.S. Watson, participates in “Innovation Days” and global tech partnerships.

• Israel Innovation Authority: The audit notes that A.S. Watson’s “O+O” (Offline plus Online) strategy relies on cutting-edge retail tech. Israel is a global hub for retail analytics and cybersecurity. While specific vendor contracts are confidential, the presence of Hutchison Kinrot in the group portfolio creates an internal pipeline for Israeli tech to enter the retail stack.
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (BICC): While Superdrug is not listed as a primary sponsor in the public domain, the Israel Britain Chamber of Commerce (IBCC) actively promotes trade in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. The ongoing trade relationship is facilitated by the UK-Israel Trade and Partnership Agreement, which Superdrug benefits from via tariff-free imports of Israeli goods.

6. The “Safe Harbor” Test and Internal Governance

This section evaluates the company’s ethical consistency. A “Safe Harbor” test compares the corporate reaction to two different geopolitical conflicts to identify double standards.

6.1 The Ukraine vs. Gaza Asymmetry

• The Ukraine Standard: Following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, A.S. Watson and Superdrug (like most UK retailers) moved quickly to assess supply chain risks. Modern Slavery statements from 2022 onwards explicitly mention “The conflict in Ukraine” as a driver of migration and exploitation risk.²³ The industry standard involved removing Russian-origin products (e.g., vodka) from shelves.
• The Gaza/Palestine Standard: In contrast, the company’s response to the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is characterized by:
  1. Linguistic Ambiguity: References in ESG documents lump “Israel and Palestine” together with Sudan as generic “conflicts”.²² There is no normative judgment or specific action plan cited.
  2. Commercial Continuity: Despite the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings and widespread reports of human rights violations in the West Bank, Superdrug has not removed settlement products (Ahava) from its shelves.
• Conclusion: The company fails the Safe Harbor test. The refusal to apply the same divestment logic to illegal settlements as was applied to sanctioned Russian entities demonstrates a political bias in its governance framework.

6.2 Internal Policy and Union Relations

• USDAW’s Position: The Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (USDAW) represents Superdrug staff. USDAW has taken a clear political stance: it has signed statements calling for an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and the recognition of the State of Palestine.²⁵
• The Governance Clash: There is a dissonance between the workforce’s representative body (pro-ceasefire/pro-Palestine recognition) and the company’s commercial operations (pro-settlement trade).
• Neutrality Policy: Superdrug enforces a “neutrality” policy regarding staff uniforms (e.g., banning political badges). In the context of the current polarization, this policy often disproportionately affects staff wishing to express solidarity with Palestine (e.g., wearing a pin or lanyard). The audit notes that while the specific “Southbank Centre” incident ²⁷ was not at a Superdrug store, the retail sector’s standard “uniform policy” is rigorously enforced to prevent “customer alienation.”
• Implication: By banning staff expressions of solidarity while continuing to sell settlement goods, Superdrug is not being neutral. It is enforcing a silence that protects its commercial complicity.

7. Partner Communications: The Historical Shadow

No audit of this group is complete without addressing Partner Communications (formerly Orange Israel).

• The Legacy: For two decades, Partner Communications was a crown jewel in the Hutchison portfolio. Under Hutchison ownership, Partner erected hundreds of cellular antennas in the West Bank, paying rent to settlements and providing the communications backbone for the occupation forces.
• The Exit: In 2022, the group sold its controlling interest to the Amphissa Holdings consortium.²⁸
• Risk Analysis: While the current financial link is severed or significantly reduced (CK Hutchison may still hold minor residual interests via index funds or diversified portfolios, but control is gone), the historical complicity is absolute. The infrastructure built by Hutchison capital remains in place. The network still services the settlements. The “exit” was a financial transaction, not a reparative one.

8. Conclusion and Complicity Rating

8.1 Summary of Findings

Superdrug Stores plc presents a facade of a progressive, value-driven UK retailer. However, a deep governance audit reveals it to be a tributary of a global conglomerate deeply entrenched in the strategic architecture of the Israeli state.

1. Retail Level: Superdrug is Directly Complicit in the settlement economy through the sale of Ahava products. This links the company to the pillage of occupied resources.
2. Parent Level: CK Hutchison is a State Builder. Through water and energy infrastructure projects, it has materially strengthened the resilience of the Israeli state, insulating it from the consequences of its resource management policies in the occupied territories.
3. Ideological Level: The $130 million Technion donation is a profound investment in the militarization of the region, supporting the R&D capabilities of the IDF.

8.2 The Complicity Scale

8.3 Final Verdict for the Governance Auditor

Superdrug cannot be “audit-cleared” as a neutral entity. It is an active participant in the normalization of the occupation. For a Political Risk Analyst, the primary recommendation is to flag the Ahava supply chain as a critical reputational and legal risk (violation of UK Modern Slavery and potential Pillage statutes). The secondary recommendation is to highlight the ultimate parent risk—investors or stakeholders engaging with Superdrug are effectively engaging with one of the primary international backers of Israeli state infrastructure.

The “Neutrality” policy enforced on staff is a governance failure; it silences the workforce while the boardroom continues to authorize trade with illegal settlements.

1. Ahava | Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.superdrug.com/ahava/b/9998995?currentPage=-32
2. Boycott of Ahava Dead Sea products makes an impact – BDS Movement, accessed January 28, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/boycott-ahava-dead-sea-products-makes-impact
3. HUTCHMED announces retirement of Chairman, appointment of new Chairman and change of members of board committees, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hutch-med.com/retirement-of-chairman-appointment-of-new-chairman/
4. Board of Directors – HUTCHMED, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.hutch-med.com/about-us/board-of-directors/
5. Power plant profile: Kochav Hayarden, Israel, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/power-plant-profile-kochav-hayarden-israel/
6. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Comes to China With US$130 Million from Li Ka Shing Foundation – הטכניון-מכון טכנולוגי לישראל, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.technion.ac.il/en/2013/10/technion-israel-institute-of-technology-comes-to-china-with-us130-million-from-li-ka-shing-foundation
7. Hong Kong–Israel relations – Wikipedia, accessed January 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong%E2%80%93Israel_relations
8. HUTCHISON-KINROT – FLAIA, accessed January 28, 2026, https://flaia.org/companies/Hutchison-Kinrot
9. Hutchison Kinrot investment portfolio – PitchBook, accessed January 28, 2026, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/investor/133197-58
10. CK Hutchison Holdings – Wikipedia, accessed January 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CK_Hutchison_Holdings
11. Sorek Desalination Plant Project I Necessary Details You Need to Know [2024], accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.blackridgeresearch.com/project-profiles/all-about-sorek-desalination-plant-israel-cost-location-detail
12. Sorek I Desalination Plant (Israel) | IDE Tech, accessed January 28, 2026, https://ide-tech.com/en/project/sorek-desalination-plant/
13. IDE Technologies takes full ownership of Sorek desalination plant | WaterWorld, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.waterworld.com/home/article/16203348/ide-technologies-takes-full-ownership-of-sorek-desalination-plant
14. US said to question China’s role in bid to construct Israeli desalination plant, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-said-to-question-chinas-role-in-bid-to-construct-israeli-desalination-plant/
15. Hutchison Water Acquires Kinrot Ventures – NoCamels, accessed January 28, 2026, https://nocamels.com/2012/11/13/hutchison-water-acquires-kinrot-ventures/
16. Hutchison’s Water Play, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.ckh.com.hk/upload/attachments/en/journal/36_4_Cover_Story_e.pdf
17. Aquarius Spectrum – 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed January 28, 2026, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/aquarius-spectrum/__sudBYiszBLkHQfFePgFyI_JjiHGB2mCAiq06AWrE_dw
18. Ahava Apple Of Sodom Advanced Deep Wrinkle Cream 50ml | Skin | Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.superdrug.com/skin/face-skin-care/face-cream/ahava-apple-of-sodom-advanced-deep-wrinkle-cream-50ml/p/mp-00169830
19. Ahava Dead Sea Osmoter Concentrate 30ml | Skin – Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.superdrug.com/skin/face-skin-care/face-serums/ahava-dead-sea-osmoter-concentrate-30ml/p/mp-00043973
20. Ahava | Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.superdrug.com/ahava/b/9998995?currentPage=-5
21. Malki | Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.superdrug.com/malki/b/9999163
22. Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement – Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://media.superdrug.com/medias/sys_master/root/h95/h16/11183864479774/Superdrug-Modern-Slavery-Statement-dec-2023/Superdrug-Modern-Slavery-Statement-dec-2023.pdf
23. Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement – Superdrug, accessed January 28, 2026, https://media.superdrug.com/medias/sys_master/root/hd6/h87/12404012089374/Superdrug-Modern-Slavery-Statement-dec-2024/Superdrug-Modern-Slavery-Statement-dec-2024.pdf
24. Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement – Savers, accessed January 28, 2026, https://media.savers.co.uk/medias/sys_master/images/hc5/h65/11495044743198/2023SAV1305-Design-Savers-Slavery-Document-2023-FINAL3/2023SAV1305-Design-Savers-Slavery-Document-2023-FINAL3.pdf
25. Statement from the UDW Executive Board calling for an immediate ceasefire in Palestine – UDW – Fighting for Workers and Our Communities, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.udw.org/news/statement-from-the-udw-executive-board-calling-for-an-immediate-ceasefire-in-palestine/
26. Usdaw welcomes the Prime Minister’s move towards recognising the state of Palestine, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.usdaw.org.uk/latest-news/palestine/
27. Southbank Centre apologises about staff member wearing Palestine badge, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.uklfi.com/10014-2
28. Partner Communications Company Ltd. – Yahoo Finance, accessed January 28, 2026, https://cdn.yahoofinance.com/prod/sec-filings/0001096691/000117891322001375/zk2227582.htm