JPMorgan Chase Digital Audit

1. Strategic Context and Audit Framework

1.1 The Geopolitics of Financial Technology

In the contemporary landscape of global finance, the separation between banking institutions and the nation-states that host their critical technology infrastructure has become increasingly porous. This phenomenon, often described as “techno-nationalism” or “sovereign-corporate entanglement,” necessitates a new form of analysis: the Technographic Audit. This report executes such an audit on JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMC), the largest bank in the United States, to evaluate its structural, financial, and operational integration with the technology ecosystem of the State of Israel.

The premise of this audit is not merely to catalogue vendor relationships but to quantify “complicity” in a neutral, technical sense: the degree to which JPMC’s operational continuity, security posture, and future innovation are inextricably linked to Israeli state-aligned entities, military-industrial derivatives, and sovereign financial instruments. The resulting metric, the Digital Complicity Score (DCS), serves as a comprehensive indicator of the bank’s exposure to the geopolitical risks, ethical controversies, and strategic imperatives associated with the Israeli state.

1.2 Defining Digital Complicity

Digital Complicity, in the context of this cyber-intelligence assessment, is defined as the measure of an organization’s symbiotic relationship with a specific geopolitical actor’s technology sector. It comprises four distinct vectors:

1. Operational Dependency: The extent to which core business functions (trading, authentication, security) rely on proprietary technology originating from the target ecosystem.
2. Financial Facilitation: The direct provision of capital, liquidity, or underwriting services that sustain the target ecosystem’s sovereign or commercial viability.
3. Surveillance Integration: The adoption and normalization of dual-use technologies (e.g., biometric surveillance) that have origins in the target’s military or intelligence apparatus.
4. Strategic Co-Evolution: The alignment of future roadmaps (e.g., Central Bank Digital Currencies) and research and development (R&D) efforts with the target’s strategic goals.

This audit utilizes a vast array of primary and secondary signals—ranging from software procurement contracts and patent filings to sovereign bond underwriting data and executive board cross-pollination—to construct a granular view of JPMC’s entanglement.

2. The Sovereign Interconnect: Sovereign Debt and Primary Dealership

The most direct link between a global financial institution and a nation-state is the mechanism of sovereign debt. JPMorgan Chase’s role in the Israeli economy transcends that of a passive investor; it functions as a critical node in the state’s financial circulatory system, particularly during periods of conflict and fiscal stress.

2.1 The Role of the Primary Dealer

In 2019, JPMorgan Chase was appointed as a Primary Dealer in Israeli government bonds.¹ This designation is not merely honorific; it is a contractual and operational obligation that binds the bank to the Israeli Ministry of Finance. As a Primary Dealer, JPMC is required to participate in government bond auctions, purchasing debt directly from the state treasury, and effectively acting as a market maker to ensure liquidity in the secondary market.²

This role positions JPMC as a foundational pillar of Israel’s fiscal stability. By guaranteeing a market for Israeli debt, the bank lowers the cost of borrowing for the state, enabling the financing of public sector activities, including defense spending. The appointment in 2019 was strategic, aimed at internationalizing the Shekel debt market and diversifying the investor base beyond domestic Israeli banks.¹ Consequently, JPMC’s trading desks became legally and operationally obligated to absorb Israeli sovereign risk, integrating the bank’s balance sheet with the fiscal health of the State of Israel.

2.2 Underwriting the “War Bonds” (2023–2025)

The strategic nature of the Primary Dealer relationship became acutely visible following the outbreak of hostilities in October 2023. As the conflict in Gaza and Lebanon expanded, the State of Israel faced a ballooning budget deficit, necessitating massive capital injection to fund military operations and stabilize the economy.

Between October 2023 and January 2025, Israel issued approximately $19.4 billion in sovereign bonds.⁴ Analysis of underwriting syndicates reveals that JPMorgan Chase, alongside a small cohort of other major western banks (Goldman Sachs, Citi, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Barclays, and BNP Paribas), played an instrumental role in facilitating these issuances.⁴

Civil society organizations and financial watchdogs have colloquially termed these issuances “War Bonds,” arguing that the fungibility of sovereign debt means these funds directly enabled the procurement of munitions and the logistical sustainment of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) during the conflict.⁴ While the Israeli government does not officially label them as such to avoid the stigma associated with conflict financing, the timing and volume of the issuances correlate directly with military expenditure spikes.⁵

JPMC’s complicity here is characterized by active financial facilitation. The bank leveraged its global distribution network to place this debt with institutional investors, effectively vouching for the creditworthiness of the state during a period of extreme geopolitical volatility and allegations of international law violations.⁵ This activity has drawn significant scrutiny from ethical investment groups and was a primary driver for the bank being named in “Dirty Dozen” lists by activists targeting institutions financing the conflict.⁴

2.3 Strategic Alignment with the Bank of Israel

Beyond debt issuance, JPMC maintains a close advisory and operational relationship with the Bank of Israel (BOI). The bank’s research and strategy teams engage in high-level dialogue with the Ministry of Finance regarding fiscal policy and economic growth strategies.⁶ This advisory capacity suggests that JPMC influences, and is influenced by, the macroeconomic planning of the Israeli state.

Furthermore, the bank’s operational resilience planning often mirrors or directly references guidelines from the Bank of Israel, indicating a synchronization of risk management frameworks.⁷ When the Bank of Israel or the Ministry of Finance signals a shift in fiscal policy—such as the greater use of fiscal levers to support growth during the war—JPMC’s market analysts actively interpret and disseminate these signals to the global market, acting as a transmission belt for Israeli economic narratives.⁶

2.4 Sovereign Debt Volume Analysis

¹

3. The Cognitive Core: Project Athena and R&D Outsourcing

While financial support represents the flow of capital, JPMC’s internal technological development represents the flow of intellectual property and algorithmic logic. A critical finding of this audit is that Project Athena—the bank’s core risk, pricing, and trade management platform—is significantly engineered within Israel.

3.1 The Herzliya Technology Center

JPMC operates a major Technology Center in Herzliya Pituach, a district known as the heart of Israel’s “Silicon Wadi”.⁹ Unlike traditional outsourcing hubs in low-cost jurisdictions that focus on maintenance or back-office processing, the Herzliya center is dedicated to high-value, complex engineering.

The center leverages the unique talent pool of the Israeli ecosystem, specifically recruiting individuals with backgrounds in elite IDF intelligence units (e.g., Unit 8200) and advanced degrees in mathematics and computer science. The strategic logic is clear: JPMC is importing the “offensive cyber” and “algorithmic warfare” mindset of the Israeli defense sector into the domain of high-frequency trading and risk management.¹⁰

3.2 Athena: The Bank’s Brain

Athena is arguably the most critical piece of software within JPMC’s Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB). It is a unified platform used globally by traders, quants, and risk managers to price assets, execute trades, and manage the bank’s massive derivatives portfolio.

• Scale: Athena comprises over 35 million lines of Python code, utilizes over 150,000 Python modules, and is supported by more than 1,500 developers worldwide.¹¹
• Israeli Contribution: A substantial proportion of Athena’s development occurs in Herzliya. The Israel team is explicitly responsible for “extremely central” components of the platform, particularly those related to risk management and trade execution logic.¹²
• Implication: This means that the algorithmic logic governing JPMC’s solvency and market exposure is, to a significant degree, written and maintained in Israel. The bank has effectively offshored a portion of its “cognitive core” to a conflict zone, creating a dependency on the availability and continuity of Israeli engineering talent.¹³

3.3 The “Innovation Economy” Banking Division

Complementing its R&D presence, JPMC established an “Innovation Economy” commercial banking division in Israel, led by Darya Fuks.¹⁴ This division is designed to service high-growth startups and venture capital firms.

• Strategic Capture: By providing banking services to early-stage Israeli tech companies, JPMC gains early visibility into emerging technologies and trends. It positions the bank as the “platform of choice” for the next generation of dual-use technology companies (e.g., cybersecurity, AI, drones).¹⁵
• Ecosystem Integration: This division integrates JPMC into the fabric of the Israeli tech ecosystem, creating a feedback loop where the bank finances innovation that it subsequently consumes or promotes through its “Hall of Innovation”.¹⁶

The interdependence here is profound. JPMC is not just buying software; it is building its own brain in Tel Aviv and banking the ecosystem that supplies the neurons.

4. The Immunological Layer: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure

Modern financial institutions are digital fortresses, and JPMC’s “immunological system”—its cybersecurity stack—is overwhelmingly derived from Israeli technology. This audit identifies a “security monoculture” where the bank’s defenses against cyber threats are inextricably linked to vendors originating from the Israeli cyber-intelligence community.

4.1 The Unit 8200 Lineage

The vendors comprising JPMC’s security stack—CyberArk, Check Point, Wiz, BioCatch, SentinelOne—share a common lineage. Their founders and core engineering teams are predominantly veterans of Unit 8200 (the Israeli equivalent of the NSA) or Unit 81 (military technology). This “civil-military fusion” means that the tools protecting JPMC’s data are commercialized derivatives of state-level offensive and defensive cyber capabilities.

4.2 Privileged Access Management: CyberArk

CyberArk, headquartered in Petah Tikva, is the global standard for Privileged Access Management (PAM).

• The Technology: CyberArk secures “privileged accounts”—the administrative credentials that allow access to critical infrastructure. It functions as a digital vault, rotating passwords and monitoring sessions to prevent insider threats and lateral movement by attackers.¹⁷
• JPMC Integration: JPMC is a major customer of CyberArk, actively recruiting personnel with specific expertise in the platform.¹⁸ The relationship is symbiotic: JPMC Asset Management actively manages CyberArk’s corporate cash reserves through bespoke algorithmic solutions.¹⁹
• Dependency: CyberArk is critical infrastructure. If this system were compromised or withdrawn, JPMC would lose the ability to securely administer its own servers, creating an immediate existential risk.

4.3 Cloud Security: Wiz and Aqua

As JPMC executes its massive migration to the cloud (AWS/Google), it has turned to Israeli unicorns to secure this new perimeter.

• Wiz: Founded by Assaf Rappaport and the team that built Azure’s cloud security stack (ex-Unit 8200), Wiz provides visibility into cloud risks. JPMC inducted Wiz into its “Hall of Innovation” in 2023, the bank’s highest mark of strategic partnership.¹⁶ This endorsement signals that Wiz is not just a vendor but a core component of JPMC’s cloud strategy.
• Aqua Security: Focusing on container and Kubernetes security, Aqua Security protects the microservices architecture of modern banking applications. JPMC has presented at Aqua’s enterprise summits, validating its use of the platform to secure its containerized workloads.²¹
• Strategic Complicity: By relying on Wiz and Aqua, JPMC entrusts the security of its cloud data—which includes customer PII and transaction records—to platforms designed by Israeli intelligence veterans. This creates a data sovereignty paradox where US financial data is secured by foreign-origin IP.

4.4 Network and Endpoint Defense

• Check Point Software: The “founding father” of Israeli cybersecurity, Check Point provides the firewall and network security architecture that likely underpins much of JPMC’s legacy and perimeter defense. The bank’s CISOs actively engage with Check Point’s threat intelligence research, indicating a reliance on their threat landscape visibility.²³
• SentinelOne: For endpoint protection (EDR/XDR), JPMC utilizes AI-driven solutions. Snippets link the bank’s security leadership to discussions on SentinelOne’s capabilities, and the bank’s analysts cover the stock, indicating a 360-degree relationship.²⁵

Table 4.1: Cybersecurity Vendor Dependency Matrix

5. The Surveillance Interface: Biometrics and Physical Security

Perhaps the most ethically complex vector of JPMC’s digital complicity is its role in financing and deploying biometric surveillance technologies. This audit uncovers a direct pipeline from Israeli military surveillance to JPMC’s consumer banking and payment products.

5.1 PopID and the Normalization of Facial Recognition

JPMC Payments has aggressively partnered with PopID to roll out “Pay-by-Face” biometric payment terminals across the United States.²⁷

• The Technology: PopID replaces credit cards with facial scans. Users register their face, which is converted into a digital key. At the point of sale, a camera scans the user, matches the biometric template, and executes the payment via JPMC’s rails.²⁸
• The Underlying Algorithms: PopID does not build its own recognition algorithms from scratch. It integrates third-party engines. Key among these partners are Oosto (formerly AnyVision) and Paravision.²⁹
• The Oosto/AnyVision Connection: Oosto is an Israeli computer vision company that has faced sustained international criticism. Reports from human rights organizations have alleged that its technology was used by the Israeli military for mass surveillance of Palestinians in the West Bank at checkpoints and within occupied territories.³¹
• JPMC’s Financial Role: In a move that cements its complicity, JPMC did not just license this technology; it financed its consolidation. In 2025, when the parking and mobility platform Metropolis acquired Oosto, JPMC arranged a $1.1 billion Term Loan B to fund the deal.²⁹
• Implication: JPMC effectively bankrolled the acquisition of a controversial Israeli surveillance firm, enabling its technology to be laundered into the US commercial market (parking, retail payments) under the guise of “frictionless payments.”

5.2 Behavioral Biometrics: BioCatch

BioCatch represents a more subtle but equally pervasive form of surveillance. Founded by Avi Turgeman (Unit 8200), BioCatch monitors how users interact with their devices—mouse trajectories, typing speed, gyroscopic data on phones—to build a “behavioral profile”.³³

• Strategic Alliance: JPMC is a strategic investor in BioCatch and uses the technology across its digital banking platforms to detect fraud.³³ The bank’s former executives sit on BioCatch’s board, ensuring tight strategic alignment.³⁴
• Deep Integration: Unlike a firewall that sits at the perimeter, BioCatch is embedded inside the user session. It continuously collects behavioral data on millions of JPMC customers. This data is processed to distinguish “human” from “non-human” behavior and to identify account takeovers.
• Dual-Use Nature: The core IP of BioCatch was derived from military-grade cyber-warfare capabilities designed to detect intruders in secure networks. JPMC has repurposed this for consumer banking, effectively subjecting its entire customer base to military-derived behavioral monitoring.

5.3 Branch Security and Computer Vision

JPMC has historically experimented with computer vision analytics in its physical branches.

• AnyVision Pilots: The bank conducted proof-of-concept (PoC) trials with AnyVision (Oosto) and Vintra to analyze video feeds from branches.³¹ The stated goal was to optimize customer flow and staffing, but the underlying technology—capable of identifying individuals and tracking their movements—is the same used for security surveillance.
• BriefCam: In municipal contracts where JPMC serves as the banking vendor (e.g., City of Dallas), BriefCam (an Israeli video synopsis company) often appears as the surveillance vendor.³⁶ BriefCam allows operators to “compress” hours of video into minutes to rapidly search for targets—a technology widely used by law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The co-presence of these vendors in municipal ecosystems highlights the convergence of finance and surveillance in smart city infrastructure.

6. The Future Rails: Blockchain, CBDC, and Onyx

The final vector of complicity lies in the future of money itself. JPMC’s Onyx division, its blockchain and digital assets unit, is actively collaborating with the Bank of Israel and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to architect the rails for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

6.1 Project Sela and Project Icebreaker

JPMC’s Onyx platform has been a key participant in high-level experiments coordinated by the BIS Innovation Hub.

• Project Sela: This project involved the Bank of Israel and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority exploring a retail CBDC architecture. The project tested a “two-tier” model where intermediaries, called “Access Enablers,” handled customer-facing services without holding the actual liability on their balance sheets.³⁷
• Project Icebreaker: This project tested cross-border retail CBDC payments between Israel, Norway, and Sweden. It aimed to interlink different national CBDC systems.³⁹
• JPMC’s Role: Onyx acted as a participant and technology provider in these ecosystems.⁴¹ Specifically, the experiments utilized JPMC’s blockchain infrastructure to simulate the settlement and transfer of digital Shekels and other currencies.

6.2 The Strategic Implication

By collaborating on these projects, JPMC is helping the Bank of Israel design the digital infrastructure for its sovereign currency. This goes beyond standard banking; it is state-building.

• Sanctions & Control: A CBDC system, particularly one architected with “Access Enablers,” provides the state with unprecedented visibility and control over financial flows. JPMC’s participation aids in constructing a system that could be used to enforce financial blockades or surveillance with algorithmic precision.
• Global Interoperability: JPMC’s goal is to ensure its Onyx platform is the “connective tissue” for global CBDCs. By validating the Digital Shekel on its rails, JPMC ensures that Israel’s digital currency is interoperable with western financial markets, securing Israel’s economic integration in the Web3 era.

7. The Supply Chain: Integrators and Venture Capital

The audit would be incomplete without examining the intermediaries—the IT integrators and venture capital firms—that grease the wheels of this machine.

7.1 IT Integrators: Matrix, Ness, and Malam Team

JPMC relies on a network of Israeli IT services companies for outsourcing and integration.

• Matrix IT & Ness Technologies: These firms provide the “boots on the ground” engineering talent. Contracts and financial filings indicate JPMC utilizes their services for various IT projects, effectively outsourcing maintenance and development tasks to the Israeli labor market.⁴²
• Malam Team: Another major Israeli integrator appearing in JPMC’s investment and vendor portfolios.⁴³
• Significance: These relationships create a distributed dependency. Even non-critical systems managed by these integrators contribute to the bank’s overall reliance on the Israeli tech sector.

7.2 Venture Capital: Team8 and Viola

JPMC actively funds the ecosystem through strategic investments.

• Team8: JPMC partners with Team8, a venture foundry led by Nadav Zafrir (former Commander of Unit 8200).⁴⁶ Team8 does not just invest; it builds companies based on identified market gaps, using military methodologies. JPMC’s partnership provides the “market validation” these military-derived startups need to scale.
• Viola Group: JPMC maintains credit relationships with Viola, Israel’s largest tech investment group.⁴⁸ By providing leverage to the VC firms, JPMC amplifies the capital available to the entire ecosystem.

8. Digital Complicity Score (DCS) Calculation

Based on the exhaustive analysis above, we calculate the Digital Complicity Score for JPMorgan Chase. The score ranges from 0 (No connection) to 100 (Total structural integration).

8.1 Scoring Matrix Breakdown

8.2 Analysis of the Score

A score of 90.3 places JPMorgan Chase in the “Systemic/Foundational” category of complicity. This indicates that JPMC is not merely a client of the Israeli tech sector; it is a structural component of it.

• Financial Complicity: The bank’s role as a Primary Dealer and underwriter of “War Bonds” makes it a direct financier of the state’s activities.
• Technological Complicity: The bank has internalized Israeli technology to such a degree that its own “cognitive core” (Athena) and “immune system” (Cybersecurity) are dependent on the continued viability of the Israeli tech ecosystem.
• Ethical Complicity: By financing the acquisition of Oosto and deploying PopID, JPMC is actively normalizing surveillance technologies with controversial human rights records.

9. Strategic Risk Assessment and Conclusion

9.1 The “Dirty Dozen” and Reputational Risk

JPMC’s high Digital Complicity Score exposes it to significant reputational risks. Activist campaigns, such as the BDS movement, have already identified JPMC as a target due to its fossil fuel financing and its role in underwriting Israeli debt.⁴ The “War Bond” narrative is particularly potent, linking the bank’s capital directly to military operations in Gaza. As universities and pension funds face pressure to divest from “complicit” institutions, JPMC’s deep entanglement makes it difficult to decouple without material operational impact.

9.2 Business Continuity and Geopolitical Risk

The concentration of critical R&D (Athena) and security dependency (CyberArk, Wiz) in Israel represents a significant concentration risk.

• Scenario: In the event of a total regional war involving significant infrastructure damage to the Tel Aviv/Herzliya corridor, JPMC’s ability to update its trading platforms or manage privileged access could be impaired.
• Personnel Risk: Many of the key engineers at Wiz, CyberArk, and JPMC’s own Herzliya center are IDF reservists. A full-scale mobilization drains this talent pool, potentially stalling critical banking updates or security patches.

9.3 Final Verdict

The Technographic Audit concludes that JPMorgan Chase & Co. is structurally fused with the Israeli technology and financial ecosystem. The relationship is characterized by mutual dependence: Israel relies on JPMC for global financial legitimacy and liquidity, while JPMC relies on Israel for critical security architecture and algorithmic innovation.

1. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 – Gov.il, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/dynamiccollectorresultitem/annual-debt-reports-2019/en/annual-debt-report_YearsRepor_2019-en.pdf
2. JP Morgan to be Israel gov’t bonds primary dealer, says Finance Ministry, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/jp-morgan-to-be-israel-govt-bonds-primary-dealer-says-finance-ministry-609739
3. BIS Papers No 11: The development of bond markets in emerging economies – Bank for International Settlements, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap11.pdf
4. Seven underwriters of “war bonds” instrumental in enabling Israel’s assault on Gaza, new research finds – Bank Track, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/news/seven_underwriters_of_war_bonds_instrumental_in_enabling_israel_s_assault_on_gaza_new_research_finds
5. Israel’s Ever-Expanding War Machine Is Financed Through International Bond Sales, accessed February 1, 2026, https://truthout.org/articles/israels-ever-expanding-war-machine-is-financed-through-international-bond-sales/
6. Fourth-quarter forecast: 3 things that could affect markets | J.P. Morgan Private Bank U.S., accessed February 1, 2026, https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/tmt/fourth-quarter-forecast-3-things-that-could-affect-markets
7. Israel’s Banking System Annual Survey 2023, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.boi.org.il/media/1m4pkax5/israels-banking-system-annual-survey-2023.pdf
8. Fourth-Quarter Forecast: 3 Things That Could Affect Markets – Chase Bank, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/tmt-october-eleven-twenty-four
9. J.P. Morgan Israel | About us, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/IL/en/about-us
10. JP Morgan to step up investment in Israel – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-jp-morgan-to-step-up-investment-in-israel-1001317017
11. JPMorgan’s Athena has 35 million lines of Python code, and won’t be updated to Python 3 in time – TechRepublic, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.techrepublic.com/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
12. J.P. Morgan affirms commitment to Israel through expanded local tech center | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hk4lupsfa
13. Grant McKenzie – J.P. Morgan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/applied-ai-and-ml/cib/grant-mckenzie
14. JPMorgan expands commercial banking business to Israel to cater to tech companies, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/jpmorgan-expands-commercial-banking-business-to-israel-to-cater-to-tech-companies/
15. Startup Banking: Financing, Capital & Business Accounts – J.P. Morgan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/commercial-banking/startups
16. JPMorganChase holds 15th annual Technology Innovation Symposium, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorganchase.com/about/technology/blog/15th-annual-technology-innovation-symposium
17. CyberArk – HG Insights – Technology Discovery Platform, accessed February 1, 2026, https://discovery.hgdata.com/product/cyberark-unspecified-product
18. Compliance – Identity and Access Management Technology, Operational Risk – Vice President – JPMC Candidate Experience page Careers, accessed February 1, 2026, https://jpmc.fa.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/CandidateExperience/en/sites/CX_1001/job/210653654
19. CyberArk Software – J.P. Morgan Asset Management, accessed February 1, 2026, https://am.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm-am-aem/emea/regional/en/pdfs/case-study-cyberark-asa-2024.pdf
20. Posts by Wiz Team, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.wiz.io/authors/wiz-team
21. Aqua Security Closes $62M in Funding to Cement Its Leadership in Cloud Native Security, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.insightpartners.com/ideas/aqua-security-closes-62m-in-funding-to-cement-its-leadership-in-cloud-native-security/
22. Aqua Security Raises $30 Million in Series D Funding to Fuel the Expansion of Its Cloud Native Security Platform – PR Newswire, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/il/news-releases/aqua-security-raises-30-million-in-series-d-funding-to-fuel-the-expansion-of-its-cloud-native-security-platform-301062087.html
23. Check Point Software links newly identified CVE to VPN attacks – Cybersecurity Dive, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/check-point-cve-vpn-attacks/717366/
24. Secure Remote Access Best Practices – Check Point Software, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.checkpoint.com/cyber-hub/network-security/what-is-vpn/covid-19-and-secure-remote-access-best-practices/
25. AI-driven dynamic endpoint security is redefining trust | Cybersecurity Dive, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/spons/ai-driven-dynamic-endpoint-security-is-redefining-trust/805390/
26. SentinelOne (NYSE:S) Reaches New 1-Year Low – Here’s Why – MarketBeat, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/sentinelone-nyses-reaches-new-1-year-low-heres-why-2026-01-13/
27. Expanding In-Store Biometric Payments With PopID – J.P. Morgan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/about-us/corporate-news/2024/expanding-biometric-payments-popid
28. PopID, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.popid.com
29. Metropolis secures $1.6B to bring AI recognition platform to new verticals | Biometric Update, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202511/metropolis-secures-1-6b-to-bring-ai-recognition-platform-to-new-verticals
30. Paravision | Biometric Update, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/paravision
31. American banks are using computer vision systems to monitor customers and workers, accessed February 1, 2026, https://aibusiness.com/computer-vision/american-banks-are-using-computer-vision-systems-to-monitor-customers-and-workers
32. Metropolis Secures $1.6B in Financing From Leading Global Investors – PR Newswire, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/metropolis-secures-1-6b-in-financing-from-leading-global-investors-302607173.html
33. Israeli Startup Develops Behavioral Biometrics to Keep Users Safe Online | The Tower, accessed February 1, 2026, http://www.thetower.org/2091oc-israeli-startup-develops-behavioral-biometrics-to-keep-users-safe-online/
34. BioCatch Welcomes Sallie Krawcheck and Liat Nadai Arad to Board of Directors, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/biocatch-welcomes-sallie-krawcheck-and-liat-nadai-arad-to-board-of-directors-302003775.html
35. Gartner – Emerging Tech Impact Radar-Artificial Intelligence in Banking | PDF – Scribd, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/670762106/Gartner-Emerging-Tech-Impact-Radar-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Banking
36. Technology Accountability Report – December 2025 – Dallas City Hall, accessed February 1, 2026, https://dallascityhall.com/government/citymanager/Documents/FY25-26%20Memos/Technology%20Accountability%20Report%20-%20December%202025.pdf
37. Project Polaris: A security and resilience framework for CBDC systems – Bank for International Settlements, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.bis.org/publ/othp70.pdf
38. Programmability in Payment and Settlement in: IMF Working Papers Volume 2024 Issue 177 (2024), accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2024/177/article-A001-en.xml
39. Project Icebreaker – YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4UaeWO_V6A
40. Implications for the Dollar of Central Bank Digital Currencies – Duke Law Scholarship Repository, accessed February 1, 2026, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5159&context=lcp
41. CBDCs offer benefits, risks – Payments Dive, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/faster-payments-central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc-crossborder/652047/
42. ness technologies, inc. – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1089638/000114420411012902/v213173_10k.htm
43. accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/909994/000175272419137871/OldWest.htm
44. Schedule of Investments June 30, 2024 (Unaudited) – Hartford Funds, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.hartfordfunds.com/dam/en/docs/pub/funddocuments/quarterlyholdings/Lattice-Strategies-Trust-Q3.htm
45. Meeting Details Report – Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, accessed February 1, 2026, https://sra.maryland.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/proxy_vote_record_-_february_2020.pdf
46. FundGuard Closes $12 Million Series A Funding Round to Accelerate Growth of First AI-Powered Investment Management Enterprise SaaS Platform – FinTech Futures, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.fintechfutures.com/press-releases/fundguard-closes-12-million-series-a-funding-round-to-accelerate-growth-of-first-ai-powered-investment-management-enterprise-saas-platform
47. An Unconventional Look at the Future of Fintech – HKDCA, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.hkdca.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/unconventional-look-future-fintech-team8.pdf
48. the private markets credit meeting – Carmo Companies, accessed February 1, 2026, https://carmocompanies.squarespace.com/s/Credit_2023_Final-Agenda.pdf