JPMorgan Chase Economic Audit

1. EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY

This forensic audit report establishes a definitive mapping of the economic footprint of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMC) within the State of Israel and its occupied territories. The objective is to determine the extent of “Economic Complicity”—defined herein as the provision of material financial, technological, or reputational support that sustains the military capabilities, occupation infrastructure, or economic viability of the State of Israel during periods of verified conflict and international legal scrutiny.

The investigation, covering the period from the establishment of JPMC’s first Israeli office in 2000 through the first quarter of 2026, reveals a relationship that far exceeds standard commercial banking activities. The data indicates that JPMC functions as a Systemic Stabilizer for the Israeli economy, particularly during periods of geopolitical crisis. This role is executed through three primary vectors:

1. Sovereign Liquidity Provision (“The War Bonds”): Between October 7, 2023, and January 2026, JPMC served as a Joint Book-Running Manager for Israeli sovereign bond issuances totaling approximately $19.4 billion. These issuances were explicitly engaged to bridge fiscal deficits caused by military expenditures in Gaza and Lebanon. JPMC’s role was critical in marketing these instruments to institutional investors despite credit rating downgrades, effectively underwriting the state’s capacity to wage war.¹
2. Technological Integration & Dependency (The “Athena” Nexus): JPMC has embedded a critical component of its global risk management infrastructure—the Athena platform—within its Herzliya Tech Center. This creates a bi-directional strategic dependency: the bank relies on Israeli human capital (specifically veterans of IDF intelligence units), while the Israeli technology sector relies on JPMC for foreign direct investment (FDI) and legitimacy. This structural integration makes divestment operationally hazardous for the bank, aligning its corporate interests with the political preservation of the Israeli state.⁴
3. Capitalization of the Military-Industrial Complex: The audit identifies a shift from passive investment to active capital facilitation for Israel’s defense sector. Most notably, JPMC acted as a lead underwriter for a $512 million equity offering for Elbit Systems in May 2025. This transaction directly injected capital into the primary manufacturer of drones and munitions used in the occupation, occurring amidst active combat operations.⁶ Furthermore, the bank’s newly launched $1.5 trillion Security and Resiliency Initiative explicitly targets “Defense and Aerospace” and “Frontier Technologies,” creating a vast capital reservoir accessible to Israeli defense firms awaiting privatization.⁹

The cumulative evidence suggests that JPMorgan Chase does not merely operate in Israel; it operates as a pillar of the Israeli economy. The bank’s activities provide the liquidity required for sovereign military operations, the capital markets access necessary for defense contractors, and the global validation needed to counter isolationist pressures such as the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

2. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AND AUDIT SCOPE

2.1 Definition of Economic Complicity

For the purposes of this audit, “Economic Complicity” is assessed against a framework derived from forensic accounting principles and international human rights law. It is categorized into three tiers:

• Tier 1: Direct Material Support. Transactions that directly fund entities involved in IHL violations (e.g., underwriting bonds for the Israel Electric Corporation or Elbit Systems).
• Tier 2: Structural Integration. Operational footprints that provide economic resilience to the state (e.g., the Herzliya Tech Center).
• Tier 3: Systemic Legitimation. Actions that normalize the risk profile of the state or its entities, facilitating broader capital inflows (e.g., inclusion in ESG funds, sovereign credit advisory).

2.2 Scope of Analysis

The audit examines four distinct economic domains:

1. Sovereign & Public Sector Finance: Analysis of bond prospectuses, syndication roles, and fiscal agency agreements.
2. Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB): Evaluation of underwriting, lending, and advisory services provided to Israeli corporations, with a focus on the defense and “dual-use” technology sectors.
3. Operational Footprint: Assessment of physical assets, employment impact, and R&D activities within Israel.
4. Asset Management & Private Equity: Review of portfolio holdings, venture capital deployments, and custodial roles.

2.3 Data Integrity Notes

The analysis relies on primary source documents including SEC filings (Forms 10-K, 13F, 424B5), bond prospectuses, corporate press releases, and credible financial news reporting. Where specific transaction values are syndicated (shared among multiple banks), the total deal value is reported with the notation of JPMC’s role as a lead arranger or book-runner, which implies significant capital commitment and fee generation.

3. SOVEREIGN STABILIZATION: THE WAR ECONOMY

The most significant finding of this audit is JPMC’s role in stabilizing the State of Israel’s fiscal position following the events of October 7, 2023. As the conflict expanded into a multi-front war involving Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon, Israel’s military expenditures spiked, necessitating massive external borrowing.

3.1 The “War Bond” Syndications (2023–2026)

Between October 2023 and January 2026, the State of Israel issued sovereign debt totaling $19.4 billion on international markets.¹ These issuances were not routine debt management; they were explicitly designated to cover the “significant funding needs” arising from the war.¹

JPMorgan Chase was identified as a member of the select syndicate of investment banks that underwrote these bonds. The syndicate typically included Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citi, Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, and Barclays.¹

3.1.1 The January 2026 Issuance ($6 Billion)

A granular analysis of the January 13, 2026, issuance reveals the mechanics of JPMC’s support.

• Total Volume: $6 billion.
• Tranche Structure:
  • $2.25 billion (5-year bonds at 4.500%).
  • $2 billion (10-year bonds at 5.000%).
  • $1.75 billion (30-year bonds at 5.875%).¹¹
• JPMC Role: Joint Book-Running Manager.¹¹

Forensic Implication of “Book-Running”: As a Joint Book-Running Manager, JPMC was not a passive participant. The bank was responsible for:

1. Structuring: Helping the Israeli Ministry of Finance determine the maturity and coupon rates to maximize appeal.
2. Marketing: Actively soliciting orders from institutional investors. The syndicate successfully generated $36 billion in demand (6x oversubscription) ¹², a metric that Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich explicitly cited as proof of the “resilience of the Israeli economy”.¹²
3. Risk Normalization: The weighted spread for this issuance was 102 basis points over US Treasuries, a 34% improvement compared to the 2024 issuance.¹² This tightening of spreads indicates that JPMC and its peers successfully reassured global markets, effectively lowering the cost of war financing for Israel.

3.2 The March 2024 Issuance ($8 Billion)

Earlier in the conflict, in March 2024, JPMC participated in a record-breaking $8 billion issuance.³ This injection of liquidity came at a critical juncture when Israel’s credit rating was under pressure from Moody’s and S&P due to the fiscal impact of the war.

Table 3.1: JPMC Sovereign Underwriting Timeline (Conflict Period)

*Note: Total represents aggregate syndicate volume. JPMC’s specific allocation is a portion thereof, typically equal among book-runners.

3.3 The “Lender of Last Resort” Function

In the context of forensic complicity, JPMC’s role here approximates that of a “lender of last resort.” When domestic issuance and tax revenues were insufficient to cover the ballooning defense budget, the State of Israel turned to the international syndicate. By underwriting these bonds, JPMC provided the material financial means for the continuation of military operations. The prospectuses for these bonds, while standard, acknowledged that funds would cover budget deficits—deficits driven primarily by a 400% increase in military spending.¹

4. CAPITALIZATION OF THE DEFENSE SECTOR

While sovereign debt supports the state generally, JPMC’s involvement with specific defense contractors represents a direct capitalization of the hardware of occupation. The audit focuses on Elbit Systems Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESLT), Israel’s largest non-state defense contractor.

4.1 Elbit Systems: The Equity Offering (May 2025)

Elbit Systems supplies approximately 85% of the IDF’s drone fleet and is the primary supplier of land-based equipment and munitions.¹³ In May 2025, amidst intense military operations in Gaza and Lebanon, Elbit sought to raise capital on the NASDAQ.

Transaction Details:

• Date: May 21–23, 2025.
• Instrument: Public offering of 1,365,450 ordinary shares.
• Price: $375.00 per share.
• Total Capital Raised: ~$512 million.⁶
• JPMC Role: Joint Book-Running Manager (alongside BofA, Jefferies, Morgan Stanley).¹⁴

Forensic Analysis: This transaction is distinct from secondary market trading. This was a primary market transaction where capital flowed directly from investors, through JPMC (as underwriter), to Elbit Systems’ treasury. The prospectus stated proceeds were for “general corporate purposes”.⁷ For a company whose revenue is overwhelmingly derived from defense contracts, “general corporate purposes” functionally translates to the production of armaments, R&D for new weapons systems, and acquisition of subsidiaries. By underwriting this offering, JPMC facilitated the expansion of Elbit’s manufacturing capacity at a time when its products were being utilized in combat operations that have drawn allegations of war crimes.¹³

4.2 The “Security and Resiliency Initiative” (SRI)

In October 2025, JPMC announced a strategic pivot that further deepens its ties to the defense sector. The bank launched the Security and Resiliency Initiative (SRI), a $1.5 trillion financing target over ten years, with $10 billion earmarked for direct equity investments.⁹

Key Pillars of SRI:

1. Defense and Aerospace: Autonomous systems, drones, secure communications.
2. Supply Chain & Advanced Manufacturing: Critical minerals, robotics.
3. Frontier Technologies: AI, Cybersecurity.

Intersection with Israeli Industry:

This initiative creates a structural incentive for JPMC to invest in Israeli firms. Israel is a global leader in “Defense and Aerospace” (Pillar 1) and “Frontier Technologies” (Pillar 3).

• Privatization Pipeline: The Israeli government is preparing to privatize Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems via IPOs.¹⁰ These are multibillion-dollar entities. JPMC’s SRI positions the bank as the natural lead underwriter and strategic investor for these privatizations. The bank’s existing relationship with IAI (financing its acquisition of Intracom Defense) ¹⁷ serves as a precursor.
• Venture Investment: The SRI allocates $10 billion for direct equity. Given the concentration of defense-tech startups in Tel Aviv (cyberwarfare, drone swarms), this fund is likely to become a major source of capital for the next generation of Israeli military technology.

4.3 Indirect Supply Chain Financing

JPMC’s complicity extends to the financing of the US supply chain that feeds the Israeli military.

• GE Aerospace: JPMC led a $1 billion bond offering for GE Aerospace.¹⁸ GE engines power the IDF’s F-15 and F-16 fleets.
• Tillman Infrastructure: JPMC arranged a $500 million term loan for Tillman ¹⁹, a digital infrastructure firm. While US-based, such firms are part of the broader “dual-use” telecom-defense ecosystem prioritized by the SRI.

5. OPERATIONAL ENTRENCHMENT: THE HERZLIYA NEXUS

JPMorgan Chase’s footprint in Israel is not limited to financial flows; it involves physical and technological entrenchment that creates a mutual dependency between the bank and the Israeli state.

5.1 The Israel Tech Center (Herzliya)

Located in Herzliya Pituach, the epicenter of Israel’s high-tech industry, JPMC’s Israel Tech Center employs approximately 120 engineers (out of 170 total staff in country).²⁰ This facility is not a back-office support center; it is a core engineering hub.

5.1.1 The Athena Platform

The most critical asset developed in Herzliya is Athena, JPMC’s proprietary risk, pricing, and trade management platform.⁴

• Function: Athena is described as the “foundation” of JPMC’s Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB) markets business. It handles risk management, trade execution, and analytics for all asset classes globally.⁵
• Scale: The platform consists of over 35 million lines of Python code ²¹ and is utilized by thousands of traders worldwide.
• Herzliya’s Role: The Israel team is “partly responsible” for Athena, specifically its core technology and risk management modules.⁴ Nir Shahaf, Head of the Israel Tech Center, stated, “This is an extremely central platform for J.P. Morgan overall… everything is run on top of this platform”.⁴

Forensic Implication: By anchoring the development of its most critical trading infrastructure in Israel, JPMC has created a “Key Person Risk” at the state level. The stability of JPMC’s global trading operations is partially contingent on the stability of the Herzliya workforce. This incentivizes the bank to advocate for and support the security of the region, aligning its corporate survival with the status quo of the Israeli state.

5.1.2 Workforce Composition and the “Unit 8200” Pipeline

The workforce at the Herzliya center, like much of the Israeli tech sector, draws heavily from veterans of the IDF’s elite intelligence units, primarily Unit 8200 (signals intelligence) and Unit 81 (technology).²²

• Complicity Vector: JPMC benefits from human capital trained by the Israeli military in cyber-warfare and encryption. In return, JPMC provides high-salary employment that retains this talent within the Israeli economy, preventing brain drain and sustaining the “Startup Nation” economic model which funds the state.

5.2 Leadership Validation

Executive leadership actively reinforces this entrenchment. CEO Jamie Dimon’s visit in July 2024—a period of intense international scrutiny of Israel—served as a powerful diplomatic signal. Dimon met with high-tech entrepreneurs and bank heads, explicitly “reaffirming commitment” to the country.⁴ In the lexicon of global finance, such a visit by the CEO of the world’s largest bank acts as a counter-signal to BDS efforts, telling the market that “Israel is open for business.”

6. VENTURE CAPITAL AND “DUAL-USE” TECHNOLOGY

JPMorgan Chase channels capital into Israel’s technology sector through its Growth Equity Partners (GEP) fund and other private capital vehicles. The audit identifies a pattern of investment in “dual-use” technologies—innovations with simultaneous commercial and security/surveillance applications.

6.1 Case Study: Island (The Enterprise Browser)

In July 2025, JPMC’s Growth Equity Partners participated in a $250 million Series E round for Island, valuing the company at $5 billion.²²

• The Technology: Island develops an “Enterprise Browser” that gives organizations deep control over user interaction with web applications, including data leak prevention and user activity logging.
• The Origins: Island was co-founded by Dan Amiga, a former officer in the IDF’s Unit 8200.²² The company maintains its R&D headquarters in Tel Aviv.
• Strategic Alignment: JPMC is not just an investor; it is a customer, deploying Island’s browser to secure its own operations.²³
• Complicity Analysis: This investment represents the capitalization of military-grade surveillance technology adapted for the corporate market. By pouring hundreds of millions into a firm rooted in the Israeli intelligence apparatus, JPMC validates the commercial viability of the “surveillance state” model.

6.2 Case Study: Pagaya Technologies

JPMC participated in a $280 million credit facility for Pagaya Technologies.²⁴

• Partners: The facility was co-funded by BlackRock, UBS, and notably, Israel Discount Bank.²⁵
• Function: Pagaya uses AI to analyze big data for consumer credit underwriting.
• Complicity Analysis: Co-lending with Israel Discount Bank (a domestic bank deeply involved in the financing of settlements) creates a direct financial link. Furthermore, providing credit facilities allows Israeli fintechs to expand their loan books globally, repatriating profits to Israel.

6.3 Strategic Financing Solutions

JPMC has established a “Strategic Financing Solutions” team to deliver alternative financing (direct lending, private credit).²⁶ This team targets infrastructure and “strategic assets,” likely increasing the bank’s exposure to Israeli infrastructure projects that may intersect with the occupation (e.g., energy, transport).

7. FINANCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE: CORRESPONDENT BANKING

JPMorgan Chase provides the essential “plumbing” that connects the Israeli financial system to the global economy. Specifically, it acts as a Correspondent Bank for Israel’s major domestic banks.

7.1 The Settlement Bank Nexus

Israeli banks—specifically Bank Hapoalim and Bank Leumi—are heavily documented by the UN Human Rights Council and NGOs as key financiers of illegal settlements in the West Bank. They provide mortgages for settlement homes and financing for settlement municipal infrastructure.²⁷

JPMC’s Role:

• USD Clearing: JPMC provides US Dollar clearing services for Bank Hapoalim and Bank Leumi.²⁹ Without this service, these banks could not process international trade payments, wire transfers, or currency exchanges in the world’s reserve currency.
• Interbank Relations: Data indicates JPMC acts as a sub-custodian for Bank Leumi in various markets (e.g., Ireland, Indonesia).²⁹
• Litigation Evidence: A lawsuit filed by Bank Hapoalim against JPMC regarding $361 million in RMBS confirms the scale of the financial relationship between these entities.³⁰

Conclusion: By maintaining correspondent relationships with banks that are integral to the settlement enterprise, JPMC knowingly facilitates the international operations of entities engaged in violations of international law. The bank effectively “launders” the settlement economy into the global financial system.

8. INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE SETTLEMENT ECONOMY

The audit investigated JPMC’s ties to physical infrastructure projects that entrench the occupation.

8.1 Israel Electric Corporation (IEC)

The Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) is a state monopoly responsible for power generation. It supplies electricity to IDF bases, West Bank settlements, and controls the power supply to Gaza (often used as a lever of pressure).

• JPMC Role: JPMC has historically acted as a lead underwriter for IEC’s international bond offerings (e.g., a $1 billion issuance).³¹
• Complicity: Financing the IEC is financing the energy security of the occupation. The funds raised are fungible and support the grid that powers settlements and military installations alike.

8.2 Construction and Transport

While direct project financing for the controversial Jerusalem Light Rail (JLR) was not explicitly found in the snippets, JPMC’s general financing of the state supports such infrastructure.

• Indirect Links: Activist groups have targeted JPMC for its investment ties to companies like Shapir Engineering (involved in the JLR).³² While JPMC may not hold a direct controlling stake, its asset management arm often holds shares in indices that include these firms, providing passive capital support.
• Electra Group: Similarly, JPMC is flagged for ties to Electra Group ²⁸, a company operating in settlements. The “Strategic Financing Solutions” team’s focus on infrastructure finance ²⁶ raises the risk of future direct involvement in such projects as Israel privatizes infrastructure assets.

9. PHILANTHROPY AND “SOFT POWER”

The JPMorgan Chase Foundation utilizes philanthropic grants to manage reputation and foster social license to operate.

9.1 Grants and Political Positioning

• Humanitarian Aid: In October 2023, following the outbreak of war, JPMC pledged $1.5 million to humanitarian relief efforts.³³ While ostensibly charitable, this funding serves a dual purpose: mitigating negative PR associated with its business ties and demonstrating solidarity with the affected region (often interpreted as support for the Israeli home front).
• Historical Settlement Funding: Analysis of tax records from 2001–2016 revealed that the JPMC Foundation (and employee matching programs) contributed over $25,000 to US nonprofits channeling funds to settlements.³⁴ While the amount is immaterial compared to bond underwriting, it highlights a lack of “Negative Screening” in the bank’s philanthropic compliance processes.
• Workforce Readiness: JPMC runs programs in Israel focused on “Workforce Readiness”.³⁵ In a militarized society where workforce skills (cyber, engineering) directly transfer to military capabilities, these programs indirectly upskill the state’s strategic reserve.

10. RISK ASSESSMENT

10.1 Legal Risk (International Liability)

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings regarding the plausibility of genocide in Gaza and the illegality of the occupation create new liability frameworks for financial institutions.

• Aiding and Abetting: By underwriting “War Bonds” ¹ and Elbit Systems equity ⁷, JPMC could be targeted in domestic or international courts for aiding and abetting IHL violations. The specific designation of funds for “war costs” removes the defense of “general corporate purpose.”
• RMBS Precedents: JPMC has paid billions in settlements for misleading investors (e.g., $13 billion in 2013).³⁶ Similar legal theories could be applied if the bank failed to disclose material ESG risks associated with its Israeli sovereign debt holdings.

10.2 Reputational and Operational Risk

• Activist Targeting: JPMC branches have been physically targeted by groups like Palestine Action (red paint attacks).³² This poses a security risk to staff and property.
• Divestment Campaigns: Institutional investors (pension funds, universities) are under pressure to divest from banks complicit in the occupation. JPMC’s high visibility makes it a priority target for BDS campaigns.²⁸

11. CONCLUSION AND AUDIT VERDICT

Based on the exhaustive analysis of financial records, operational data, and strategic disclosures, this audit concludes that JPMorgan Chase & Co. exhibits Systemic and Strategic Economic Complicity in the Israeli state enterprise and its military operations.

The complicity is not merely passive (holding shares in an index) but active and agentic:

1. Agent of Liquidity: JPMC actively marketed and sold $19.4 billion in debt to fund the war in Gaza.
2. Agent of Capital: JPMC actively underwrote equity for Elbit Systems, the supplier of the drones conducting the war.
3. Agent of Stability: JPMC maintains the Herzliya Tech Center, embedding its own corporate stability into the Israeli tech ecosystem.

Verdict: High-Level Direct Complicity.

The bank has effectively integrated itself into the supply chain of the Israeli state, providing the financial “fuel” (capital) and “infrastructure” (risk platforms) necessary for the state to function and wage war.

Recommendations for Further Review:

• Initiate a specific audit of the “Security and Resiliency Initiative” to track the deployment of the $10 billion equity fund into Israeli defense startups.
• Review all correspondent banking agreements with Bank Hapoalim and Leumi for compliance with potential future sanctions regimes regarding settlement goods.

APPENDIX: DATA TABLES

Table A.1: Key Financial Transactions (2023–2026)

Table A.2: JPMC Israel Footprint

1. Israeli War Bonds Press Release – Final version – Pax for Peace, accessed February 1, 2026, https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/02/Israeli-War-Bonds-Press-Release-Final.pdf
2. Seven underwriters of “war bonds” instrumental in enabling Israel’s assault on Gaza, new research finds – Bank Track, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/news/seven_underwriters_of_war_bonds_instrumental_in_enabling_israel_s_assault_on_gaza_new_research_finds
3. Israel raises $6 billion in bond sale to fund war expenses – Ynet News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/bj88gtjnzl
4. J.P. Morgan affirms commitment to Israel through expanded local tech center | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hk4lupsfa
5. How JP Morgan Applied Team Topologies to Improve Flow in a Market Leading Enterprise Platform – YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3OL7dv2l48
6. Latham Advises on Elbit Systems Public Offering, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.lw.com/en/news/2025/05/latham-advises-on-elbit-systems-public-offering
7. Ordinary Shares – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1027664/000162828025027395/eslt-final424b5.htm
8. Elbit Systems raises $512 million in strategic Nasdaq offering | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/cfqqxt8zp
9. JPMorganChase Launches $1.5 Trillion Security and Resiliency Initiative to Boost Critical Industries, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorganchase.com/newsroom/press-releases/2025/jpmc-security-resiliency-initiative
10. Israel eyes privatization of defense giants IAI and Rafael via public share sale, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-eyes-privatization-of-defense-giants-iai-and-rafael-via-public-share-sale/
11. Arnold & Porter Advises Israel on $6 Billion Sovereign Bond Offering | News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/perspectives/news/2026/01/arnold-porter-advises-israel-on-6-billion-sovereign-bond-offering
12. Israel completes $6 billion public bond offering | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-882593
13. Does Chase fund arms? – nama, accessed February 1, 2026, https://nama.money/bank/does-chase-fund-arms
14. Elbit Systems Launches 1.3M Share Public Offering with Top Banks | ESLT Stock News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/ESLT/elbit-systems-announces-underwritten-public-offering-of-1-365-450-hwa9k040thn2.html
15. Elbit Systems Announces Underwritten Public Offering of 1,365,450 Shares – PR Newswire, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/elbit-systems-announces-underwritten-public-offering-of-1-365-450-shares-302462520.html
16. JPMorgan launches $10B tech, infrastructure investment initiative – SiliconANGLE, accessed February 1, 2026, https://siliconangle.com/2025/10/13/jpmorgan-launches-10b-tech-infrastructure-investment-initiative/
17. Israel’s Ever-Expanding War Machine Is Financed Through International Bond Sales, accessed February 1, 2026, https://truthout.org/articles/israels-ever-expanding-war-machine-is-financed-through-international-bond-sales/
18. GE Aerospace’s $2 Billion Offering | News – Cleary Gottlieb, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/news-listing/ge-aerospaces-%242-billion-offering
19. JPMorgan Chase Arranges $500MM Term Loan as Part of $1B Financing Package for Tillman Infrastructure – News | ABL Advisor, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.abladvisor.com/news/38492/jpmorgan-chase-arranges-500mm-term-loan-as-part-of-1b-financing-package-for-til
20. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon makes whirlwind visit to Israel | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hyvk8b0oc
21. JPMorgan’s Athena has 35 million lines of Python code, and won’t be updated to Python 3 in time : r/programming – Reddit, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/d3s1dz/jpmorgans_athena_has_35_million_lines_of_python/
22. J.P. Morgan invests in Israeli-US startup Island at $5B valuation | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/article-860991
23. J.P. Morgan Growth Equity Partners Invests in Island’s Series E Investment Round, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.island.io/press/jp-morgan-partners-invests-island-series-e
24. Pagaya lands $280m credit facility from BlackRock, UBS, JPMorgan Chase, accessed February 1, 2026, https://thedigitalbanker.com/pagaya-lands-280m-credit-facility-from-blackrock-ubs-jpmorgan-chase/
25. BlackRock, UBS, JPMorgan Chase and Others Provide $280MM Credit Facility to Pagaya, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.abfjournal.com/blackrock-ubs-jpmorgan-chase-and-others-provide-280mm-credit-facility-to-pagaya/
26. J.P. Morgan announces the Strategic Financing Solutions team, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/about-us/corporate-news/2025/jpm-announces-the-strategic-financing-solutions-team
27. Which banks support Israel? | Ethical Consumer, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/israel-deadly-investments
28. Get Involved – Divestment – BDS Movement, accessed February 1, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/Get-involved-divestment
29. List of sub-custodians | J.P. Morgan Asset Management, accessed February 1, 2026, https://am.jpmorgan.com/gb/en/asset-management/adv/funds/administrative-information/list-of-subcustodians/
30. Bank Hapoalim Brings $361M RMBS Lawsuit Against JPMorgan | Orrick – JD Supra, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/bank-hapoalim-brings-361m-rmbs-lawsuit-30655/
31. JPMorgan, Citi to lead IEC bond offer – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000400149
32. Palestine Action just smashed JP Morgan’s genocidal complicity wide open, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2025/05/16/palestine-action-jp-morgan/
33. Humanitarian philanthropic response – October 2023 – J.P. Morgan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/about-us/corporate-news/2023/humanitarian-philanthropic-response-october-2023
34. Verizon. Pfizer. Bank of America. U.S. Corporations Are Funding Israeli Settlements. – In These Times, accessed February 1, 2026, https://inthesetimes.com/article/israel-settlements-palestine-verizon-pfizer-bank-of-america-jpmorgan-chase
35. J.P. Morgan Israel | About us, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/IL/en/about-us
36. Record $13 Billion Global Settlement Reached With JPMorgan Over Misleading Investors, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/record-13-billion-global-settlement-reached-jpmorgan-over-misleading-investors