Aston Martin Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Overview of the Audit

This report constitutes a forensic audit of the political and ideological footprint of Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML). The objective is to determine the extent of the entity’s “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of surveillance, militarisation, and apartheid. This assessment is conducted in response to specific intelligence requirements necessitating a rigorous examination of governance ideology, material supply chain integration, lobbying activities, and comparative geopolitical policy application (the “Safe Harbor” test).

The findings detailed herein are derived from a comprehensive analysis of open-source intelligence (OSINT), corporate filings, technological partnership announcements, philanthropic records, and comparative policy statements. The audit operates under the rubric of political risk analysis, evaluating not only direct financial contributions but also the normalization of state-linked technologies, the ideological affiliations of key governance figures, and the consistency of corporate ethical frameworks across different geopolitical conflict zones.

1.2. Primary Findings

The audit identifies a High Level of Complicity within Aston Martin Lagonda’s governance and operational structures. While the company projects an image of luxury neutrality, the underlying data reveals deep, structural ties to Israeli state interests, primarily driven by:

1. Ideological Governance: The Executive Chairman, Lawrence Stroll, and Non-Executive Director, Michael de Picciotto, exhibit profound personal and philanthropic ties to Zionist advocacy and Israeli state institutions. Specifically, Michael de Picciotto has established and funded research centers at the Weizmann Institute of Science and continues a family legacy of support for Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, institutions deeply embedded in Israel’s scientific-military complex.¹
2. Technological Integration: The company has formally designated SentinelOne, a cybersecurity firm founded by veterans of the IDF’s elite Unit 8200 intelligence corps, as its “Official Cybersecurity Partner.” This partnership is not merely a sponsorship but a foundational integration of Israeli military-grade cyber technology into Aston Martin’s manufacturing, headquarters, and supply chain operations, effectively embedding the Israeli security state’s logic into the company’s digital infrastructure.⁴
3. The “Safe Harbor” Double Standard: A forensic comparison of AML’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the Gaza conflict (2023–2026) reveals a stark “Double Standard.” The company halted all trade with Russia and issued statements of solidarity for Ukraine, yet has maintained “business as usual” with Israel, including the continued operation of its Tel Aviv dealership, despite the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. This selective application of ethical trading standards suggests an ideological alignment with Western/NATO foreign policy that shields Israel from the sanctions applied to other aggressor states.⁷
4. Supply Chain Dependencies: While current models like the DB12 largely utilize Bosch ADAS components, the strategic pivot toward Electric Vehicles (EVs) through a partnership with Lucid Group introduces a high probability of future dependency on Mobileye, an Israeli autonomous driving giant. Furthermore, the company’s engagement with Magna, a supplier with its own Israeli tech integrations (PlaxidityX), further entwines AML in the ecosystem of Israeli “dual-use” technology.¹⁰

1.3. Audit Scorecard Summary

The following table summarizes the key complicity indicators identified during the research phase. These data points serve as the basis for the detailed narrative analysis that follows.

2. Audit Framework and Geopolitical Context

2.1. Defining Political Complicity

In the context of this audit, “Political Complicity” is defined not merely as the breaking of international law, but as the voluntary participation in, support for, or normalization of systems that sustain the occupation of Palestine. This includes:

• Ideological Support: Leadership participation in organizations that advocate for Zionism or fund Israeli state infrastructure.
• Material Support: Purchasing technology or services from companies that directly support the IDF or the Israeli economy’s defence sector.
• Normalization: Engaging in “business as usual” trade that legitimizes the state’s actions, particularly when contrasted with sanctions applied to other states (e.g., Russia).
• Surveillance Integration: Adopting technologies developed by Israeli intelligence veterans, which often utilize knowledge and methods derived from the surveillance of Palestinians.

2.2. The Luxury Automotive Sector as Geopolitical Actor

Luxury automotive brands like Aston Martin operate in a rarefied sphere of global capital. They are often viewed as “neutral” purveyors of excellence, yet they rely heavily on:

1. High-Net-Worth Individuals (HNWIs): A client base that includes geopolitical actors, oligarchs, and state beneficiaries.
2. Advanced Technology: Increasing reliance on AI and cyber-defense, sectors where Israel has strategically positioned itself as a global leader (“Start-Up Nation” diplomacy).
3. Soft Power: Brands are used to project national prestige. The presence of an Aston Martin dealership in Tel Aviv is not just a commercial outlet; it is a marker of Israel’s integration into the Western luxury consumer sphere, serving as a counter-narrative to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement.

The “Brand Israel” campaign explicitly seeks to associate Israel with innovation, luxury, and technology rather than conflict. By partnering with Israeli tech firms like SentinelOne and Mobileye, Aston Martin becomes a vehicle for this normalization, effectively “laundering” the reputation of a military-industrial complex through the glamour of Formula One and Grand Tourers.

3. Governance Ideology: The Board and Ownership Architecture

The ideological direction of a corporation is set by its governance. For Aston Martin, the board represents a complex intersection of Western Zionist philanthropy, Saudi sovereign wealth, and Chinese industrial interests. This section forensically audits the key individuals and their documented affiliations.

3.1. Executive Chairman: Lawrence Stroll (Lawrence Strulovitch)

Lawrence Stroll is the central figure in Aston Martin’s modern era. His consortium rescued the company in 2020, and his control is absolute. His ideological footprint is significant and firmly rooted in Jewish philanthropic networks that support Israeli causes.

3.1.1. Philanthropic Affiliations and Zionist Advocacy

The audit reveals that Stroll is a prominent figure in philanthropic circles that overlap heavily with Zionist advocacy.

• World ORT: Stroll is listed as a donor to World ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training).¹² While ORT is an educational charity, its operations in Israel are vast, managing schools and technical colleges that feed directly into the Israeli industrial and military sectors. Support for ORT is a standard form of “soft” Zionist philanthropy, focusing on strengthening the state’s human capital.
• Proximity to “Friends of the IDF” (FIDF): Stroll’s name frequently appears in Jewish community newsletters such as eJewishPhilanthropy and Jewish Insider, often in columns that also report on FIDF activities or list the birthdays of prominent community members.¹³ While some initial intelligence might conflate these mentions with board membership, a forensic reading clarifies that he is a “person of interest” within the same social stratum as FIDF leadership. For example, he is listed alongside individuals like Ronny Ben-Josef (FIDF National Board Member) and IDF generals in community updates.¹⁵
  • Significance: This proximity is crucial. It places Stroll in the “inner circle” of donors who attend galas where millions are raised for the Israeli military. The Jewish Review describes him as “inimitable” in his leadership of community funds.¹⁶ The social pressure and ideological conformity within these circles regarding support for Israel—especially post-October 7th—is intense. It is highly improbable that an Executive Chairman embedded in this milieu would countenance any corporate action by Aston Martin that could be construed as anti-Israel (e.g., adhering to BDS).

3.1.2. “Brand Israel” and Cosmopolitan Normalization

Stroll’s involvement in high-profile charity events, such as the amfAR Gala in Cannes, serves as a nexus for normalization. In 2023, Stroll auctioned the first Aston Martin DB12 Launch Edition at the amfAR Gala for €1.6 million.¹⁷ These events frequently feature a convergence of Western celebrities, business magnates, and pro-Israel philanthropists, creating an environment where Israeli normalization is the default setting. By positioning Aston Martin as the “prize” in this ecosystem, Stroll cements the brand’s status within a pro-Israel Western elite.

3.2. Non-Executive Director: Michael de Picciotto

If Stroll represents the social and cultural tier of Zionist support, Michael de Picciotto represents the institutional and structural tier. A Non-Executive Director on the Aston Martin Board ¹, de Picciotto is a scion of a Swiss banking dynasty with deep, direct commitments to the State of Israel.

3.2.1. The Weizmann Institute of Science

Michael de Picciotto personally established the de Picciotto-Lesser Cancer Cell Observatory at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel.²

• Institutional Profile: The Weizmann Institute is not a generic university; it is one of the pillars of Israel’s strategic capabilities. Historically, it was central to the development of Israel’s nuclear program and continues to be a leader in dual-use technologies (biotech, materials science, computing).
• Direct Funding: By funding a permanent observatory, de Picciotto is directly transferring capital and prestige to a key Israeli national institution. He has stated that this donation allows him to “express my attachment to my roots” and honor his grandfather, Wolfgang Lesser, a “great supporter of Israel”.²

3.2.2. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU)

Michael de Picciotto continues the legacy of his father, Edgar de Picciotto, who founded the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev (NIBN) at Ben-Gurion University.³

• Strategic Significance: BGU was founded with the explicit Zionist goal of “blooming the desert”—a project inextricably linked to the displacement of Bedouin communities in the Negev. The university works closely with the IDF (many of its technical units are moving to the Negev) and the Israeli Ministry of Defense.
• Governance Implication: De Picciotto’s role on the Aston Martin board ensures that the company’s governance is informed by a deeply personal commitment to the Zionist project. This is not a passive investment; it is an active, multi-generational effort to build Israeli state capacity.

3.3. The Ownership Structure: A Geopolitical Paradox

The shareholder composition of Aston Martin introduces a layer of geopolitical complexity that must be audited to understand the limits of Stroll’s power.

3.3.1. The Saudi Factor (PIF)

The presence of the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) ²⁰ might theoretically act as a check on overt Zionist advocacy. However, the audit suggests otherwise.

• Realpolitik: The PIF’s primary objective is Vision 2030—economic diversification. Prior to October 7th, Saudi Arabia was in advanced talks for normalization with Israel. The PIF has shown no inclination to divest from Western companies based on their ties to Israel.
• Tacit Approval: By sitting on a board alongside Stroll and Picciotto, and approving partnerships with Israeli firms like SentinelOne, the PIF is effectively signaling that it prioritizes financial returns and technological access over Palestinian solidarity. This creates a “permissive environment” where Aston Martin can deepen its ties to Israel without fear of shareholder revolt from its largest Arab investor.

3.3.2. The Chinese Factor (Geely)

Geely’s stake ²⁰ reflects China’s interest in acquiring luxury IP. While the Chinese state is rhetorically supportive of Palestine, its technology sector is deeply intertwined with Israel. Geely’s presence is unlikely to serve as a barrier to Aston Martin’s use of Israeli technology; in fact, given the heavy use of Mobileye chips in the Chinese EV market (e.g., Zeekr, a Geely brand ²¹), Geely may actively encourage deeper integration with Israeli tech firms.

4. Operational Complicity I: The Cybersecurity Nexus

The most material form of complicity identified in this audit is the integration of Israeli military-linked technology into Aston Martin’s core operations. This goes beyond mere supply chain purchasing; it represents a strategic fusion of the carmaker’s digital nervous system with the Israeli cyber-intelligence complex.

4.1. The SentinelOne Partnership

Aston Martin has designated SentinelOne as its “Official Cybersecurity Partner”.⁴

4.1.1. Origin and Ideology: The Unit 8200 Connection

SentinelOne was founded in 2013 by Tomer Weingarten and Almog Cohen.²³ Like many premier Israeli cybersecurity firms (e.g., Check Point, CyberArk, NSO Group), its DNA is rooted in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

• Unit 8200: This is the IDF’s equivalent of the NSA, responsible for signals intelligence (SIGINT) and cyber warfare. It is the unit responsible for the surveillance of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, collecting data used for blackmail, targeted assassinations, and control of the civilian population.
• The “Revolving Door”: Veterans of Unit 8200 frequently move into the private sector, founding startups that commercialize the offensive and defensive capabilities developed during their military service. SentinelOne fits this profile. By partnering with them, Aston Martin is effectively subsidizing the R&D ecosystem that maintains Israel’s digital military edge.

4.1.2. Scope of Integration

The partnership is comprehensive and deeply embedded:

• Corporate Infrastructure: SentinelOne secures Aston Martin’s headquarters, manufacturing plants, and field offices.⁴ This means Israeli-designed software has root-level access to the company’s most sensitive data.
• Formula One: The Aston Martin Aramco Formula One Team uses SentinelOne to protect the massive data streams generated by the cars.⁵ F1 cars are essentially rolling data centers; securing them with SentinelOne validates the technology on a global stage.
• Vehicle Security (UN ECE R155): As cars become “software-defined vehicles,” they require robust protection against hacking. Aston Martin uses SentinelOne’s “Singularity XDR” platform to protect its cloud workloads and IoT devices.²³ This implies that the safety of an Aston Martin driver is entrusted to algorithms developed in the context of Israeli cyber-defence.

4.1.3. Normalization and “Art-Washing”

The branding implications are critical. By plastering the SentinelOne logo on its F1 cars and press releases, Aston Martin participates in “art-washing” (or “sport-washing”) the reputation of the Israeli cyber sector. This sector has faced intense scrutiny for its role in global surveillance scandals (e.g., Pegasus). Aston Martin helps reframe this technology as “safety” and “performance” rather than “surveillance” and “warfare.”

5. Operational Complicity II: Supply Chain & Manufacturing

Beyond cybersecurity, the audit examined the physical and electronic supply chain for evidence of Israeli components, particularly in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS).

5.1. The ADAS Landscape: Mobileye vs. Bosch

Mobileye, an Intel-owned but Jerusalem-based company, is the global hegemon of ADAS vision systems. Its “EyeQ” chips are ubiquitous. The audit sought to determine if Aston Martin is a Mobileye client.

5.1.1. Current Status (DB12 and Vantage)

The research indicates that the current generation of Aston Martin sports cars (DB12) primarily utilizes Bosch architecture.

• Evidence: The DB12 Owner’s Manual lists declarations of conformity for Robert Bosch GmbH regarding blind-spot radar systems.²⁴
• Chassis Control: The car uses a six-axis Bosch motion sensor.²⁵
• Conclusion: At present, the core ADAS hardware in the internal combustion range appears to be German (Bosch) rather than Israeli (Mobileye).

5.1.2. Future Risk: The Lucid & Geely Connection

However, the trajectory of Aston Martin’s technology points inevitably toward Mobileye.

• The Lucid Partnership: Aston Martin has signed a strategic deal with Lucid Group to supply powertrain and battery systems for future EVs.¹¹ Lucid’s “DreamDrive” system relies on a sophisticated sensor suite. If Lucid’s architecture integrates Mobileye (as is common in the industry for vision processing), Aston Martin will inherit this dependency.
• The Geely Factor: Geely (a major shareholder) is a massive customer of Mobileye. Its premium EV brand, Zeekr, uses the full Mobileye SuperVision stack.²¹ As Aston Martin leverages Geely’s supply chain for cost efficiencies, the pressure to adopt the “off-the-shelf” Mobileye solution used by its shareholder will increase.
• Implication: A shift to Mobileye would mean that every future Aston Martin EV would send royalty payments to Jerusalem and rely on mapping data harvested and processed in Israel.

5.2. Magna International and PlaxidityX

Aston Martin is a customer of Magna International, a massive contract manufacturer and supplier.²⁸

• The Link: Magna has partnered with the Israeli automotive cybersecurity firm PlaxidityX (formerly Argus Cyber Security).¹⁰ Argus was founded by Unit 8200 veterans.
• Integration: Magna uses PlaxidityX technology for its intrusion detection systems. If Aston Martin purchases complete electronic sub-assemblies from Magna (a common practice), it may unknowingly be integrating PlaxidityX firmware, further embedding Israeli cyber-tech into the vehicle.

5.3. Aerospace Supply Chain Crossover

The audit identified an indirect but notable overlap with the defence sector. UK manufacturers like Attewell and CW Fletcher supply both the luxury automotive sector (including Aston Martin) and the F-35 Lightning II program.²⁹

• Relevance: The F-35 is the primary strike aircraft used by the Israeli Air Force in the bombardment of Gaza. While Aston Martin does not build F-35s, it relies on the same specialized industrial base (precision machining, exotic alloys) that sustains the F-35 supply chain. This highlights the “dual-use” nature of the UK’s high-tech manufacturing base, where the skills and materials used to build a Vantage are the same as those used to build a bomber.

6. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Comparative Geopolitics

A key metric for political complicity is the consistency of a corporation’s ethical positioning. Does it apply the same standards to all aggressors, or does it offer a “Safe Harbor” to some?

6.1. The Russia Precedent (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Aston Martin reacted with speed and moral clarity.

• Statement: “As a global brand that exports products to both Ukraine and Russia, Aston Martin is closely monitoring the ongoing situation… Our primary concern is the safety and well-being of our partners and customers in Kiev… Aston Martin is pausing sales and shipment of vehicles to Russia”.⁷
• Material Action: The company voluntarily suspended exports to Russia, accepting a financial loss. Sales data shows a drop to near zero (legacy inventory only).⁸
• Rationale: The decision was framed as a humanitarian and ethical imperative, aligning with Western sanctions and public sentiment.

6.2. The Israel/Gaza Reality (2023–2026)

Following the events of October 7th and the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza (which the ICJ has flagged as a plausible genocide), Aston Martin’s response has been silence.

• Statement: There is no record of any statement regarding the safety of partners in Palestine, nor any call for a ceasefire.
• Material Action: Business has continued without interruption. The Aston Martin Israel dealership, located in the affluent Herzliya Pituach district of Tel Aviv, remains fully operational.³⁰
• Market Context: In 2018, the Tel Aviv dealership was cited in the UK Parliament as the “fastest growing Aston Martin dealership in the world”.³¹ This suggests that the Israeli market, while numerically smaller than the US or China, is strategically significant for the brand’s ultra-high-net-worth growth strategy.

6.3. The Double Standard Verdict

The contrast is irrefutable.

• Ukraine: Invasion = Immediate Boycott & Solidarity.
• Gaza: Invasion/Bombardment = Silence & Business as Usual.

This constitutes a failure of the “Safe Harbor” test. Aston Martin has demonstrated that its “neutrality” is actually a selective alignment with NATO/Western foreign policy interests. It is willing to weaponize its supply chain against Russia but treats Israel as a protected partner, offering it a “Safe Harbor” from ethical scrutiny.

7. Lobbying, Trade Influence, and “Brand Israel”

7.1. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC)

The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce has historically served as a key vehicle for promoting trade between the two nations, specifically highlighting the automotive sector despite the Arab Boycott.³²

• Current Status: While specific current executives are not listed as B-ICC board members in the available snippets ³³, the broader ecosystem of UK-Israel trade relies on luxury exports (like Aston Martin) as flagship successes.
• Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI): The political cover for this trade is provided by the Conservative Friends of Israel. UK MPs like Martin Vickers and Stephen Crabb, who advocate for strong UK-Israel ties, are frequent attendees of CFI delegations and events.³⁴ Aston Martin, as a jewel of British manufacturing, relies heavily on government industrial strategy support. The strong CFI presence within the Conservative party ensures that companies like Aston Martin face no political pressure to divest from Israel; conversely, they likely face pressure to engage.

7.2. “Brand Israel” Marketing

The concept of “Brand Israel” is a government-led initiative to showcase Israel’s modernity. Aston Martin participates in this narrative through:

• Innovation Partnerships: By partnering with Israeli tech firms (SentinelOne), Aston Martin validates the narrative of Israel as the “Innovation Nation.”
• Event Sponsorship: The snippets indicate historical connections where El Al tickets were raffled at events associated with Aston Villa (sharing the “Aston” brand lineage in the public mind).³⁶ More directly, the F1 team’s global platform serves to normalize the presence of Israeli sponsors (SentinelOne) to a global audience of millions.

8. Internal Policy and Labor Relations

8.1. Unite the Union vs. The Board

A significant, albeit currently dormant, fault line exists within the company.

• The Workforce: The manufacturing staff at Gaydon and St Athan are heavily unionized, represented by Unite the Union.³⁷
• The Union’s Stance: Unite has officially adopted strong positions of solidarity with Palestine. Its members have participated in “Palestine Action” protests and signed open letters calling for the closure of arms factories and an end to complicity.³⁹
• The Conflict: There is a structural contradiction between a shop floor represented by a pro-Palestine union and a Boardroom led by a pro-Israel Executive Chairman. While the audit found no specific public reports of disciplinary action against Aston Martin staff for wearing Palestine badges (as seen in other sectors), the potential for internal conflict is high. If the union were to heed the BDS call to “shut down” suppliers of Israeli military tech, the SentinelOne partnership could become a flashpoint for industrial action.

8.2. BDS Targeting

Aston Martin is already circulating on grassroots BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) lists.⁴¹ The reasons cited by activists include:

1. Leadership: The explicit Zionism of Lawrence Stroll.
2. Tech: The SentinelOne partnership.
3. Market: The continued operation of the Tel Aviv dealership.

The inclusion of Aston Martin on these lists moves the risk from “theoretical” to “reputational.” For a brand that relies on “cool,” becoming a target of a youth-led social justice movement represents a long-term brand equity risk.

9. Audit Synthesis and Data for Ranking

9.1. Synthesis of Complicity

The data gathered in this audit presents a clear picture of Aston Martin Lagonda as a corporate entity that is structurally and ideologically aligned with the State of Israel.

• Structural: Through its “Official Cybersecurity Partner” SentinelOne, AML has integrated the Israeli military-intelligence complex into its own digital nervous system.
• Ideological: Its governance is led by individuals (Stroll, Picciotto) who are not merely passive supporters but active builders of Israeli state capacity through philanthropy (Weizmann, BGU, ORT).
• Operational: It maintains a “Safe Harbor” for Israeli trade while sanctioning Russia, adhering to a geopolitical double standard.

9.2. Data for Future Ranking

To facilitate a comparative ranking of Aston Martin against other entities, the following metrics should be used based on the evidence provided:

1. Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings Management – Simply Wall St, accessed February 1, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/automobiles/otc-argg.y/aston-martin-lagonda-global-holdings/management
2. Supporters | Moross Integrated Cancer Center (MICC) – Weizmann Institute of Science, accessed February 1, 2026, https://centers.weizmann.ac.il/Moross-ICC/core-facility/DPLCCO/supporters
3. Edgar de Picciotto – NIBN, accessed February 1, 2026, https://nibn.co.il/about/nibn-management/edgar-de-picciotto/
4. Aston Martin Designates SentinelOne as Its Official Cybersecurity Partner, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sentinelone.com/press/aston-martin-designates-sentinelone-as-its-official-cybersecurity-partner/
5. Aston Martin Aramco drives cybersecurity with SentinelOne, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.astonmartinf1.com/en-GB/news/announcement/aston-martin-aramco-drives-cybersecurity-with-sentinelone
6. How SentinelOne helps car data go from track to factory – Aston Martin F1 Team, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.astonmartinf1.com/en-GB/news/feature/how-sentinelone-helps-car-data-go-from-track-to-factory
7. Jaguar and Aston Martin suspend deliveries to Russia until further notice – Luxus Plus, accessed February 1, 2026, https://luxus-plus.com/en/jaguar-and-aston-martin-suspend-deliveries-to-russia-until-further-notice/
8. #LeaveRussia: Aston Martin is Temporarily Pausing Operations in Russia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/aston-martin
9. Car industry reacts to Russian invasion of Ukraine – CRRC TEIC UK, accessed February 1, 2026, https://teic.crrczic.cc/car-industry-reacts-to-russian-invasion-of-ukraine/
10. Telekom partners with specialist from Israel in car cyber security – Continental AG, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.continental.com/en/press/press-releases/2019-04-04-plaxidityx-tsystems-automotivesoc/
11. Lucid’s World-Leading Electric Powertrain Technology Propels Aston Martin to a Bold Electric Future – PR Newswire, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/in/news-releases/lucids-world-leading-electric-powertrain-technology-propels-aston-martin-to-a-bold-electric-future-301862879.html
12. AVNIIHM – Era.’11 – World ORT Archive, accessed February 1, 2026, https://ortarchive.ort.org/fileadmin/d/world_ort_headquarters/d18a724.pdf
13. Your Daily Phil: War breaks out inside Friends of the IDF – eJewishPhilanthropy, accessed February 1, 2026, https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/your-daily-phil-war-breaks-out-inside-friends-of-the-idf/
14. Robert Kraft Archives – Jewish Insider, accessed February 1, 2026, https://jewishinsider.com/tag/robert-kraft/
15. FIDF to honor four Lawrence residents | Herald Community Newspapers | www.liherald.com, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.liherald.com/stories/fidf-to-honor-four-lawrence-residents,102825
16. ROBERT LANTOS – ~* Sunhawk.ca * Christine Hogenkamp *~, accessed February 1, 2026, http://sunhawk.ca/art/wp-content/uploads/JewishReview16_Winter-Online-web.pdf
17. Aston Martin DB12 launch edition raises $1,600,000 at amfAR Gala Cannes -, accessed February 1, 2026, https://media.astonmartin.com/aston-martin-db12-launch-edition-raises-1600000-at-amfar-gala-cannes
18. Michael de Picciotto – Vice-Chairman – Engel & Völkers – XING, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.xing.com/profile/Michael_dePicciotto
19. Inauguration of the Edgar de Picciotto Family NIBN Building – YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEh9L9s3pJ0
20. Who Owns Aston Martin Lagonda? AML Shareholders – Investing.com, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.investing.com/equities/aston-martin-ownership
21. Top Automakers Double-Down on Mobileye – Investor Relations :: Intel Corporation (INTC), accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1515/top-automakers-double-down-on-mobileye
22. Aston Martin Aramco Formula One® Team Drives Cybersecurity with SentinelOne, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sentinelone.com/press/aston-martin-aramco-formula-one-team-drives-cybersecurity-with-sentinelone/
23. Aston Martin Partners with SentinelOne – Infosecurity Magazine, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/aston-martin-partners-with/
24. RY53-19A321-AB.book Page 1 Friday, November 3, 2023 10:40 AM – Aston Martin, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.astonmartin.com/guides/RY53-19A321-AB-EnEU-B6.pdf
25. Aston Martin DB12 road test – Prestige & Performance Car, accessed February 1, 2026, https://prestigeandperformancecar.com/aston-martin/aston-martin-db12-road-test/
26. GLy July Insight Post: Emerging Trends and Considerations in the ADAS Market, accessed February 1, 2026, https://glycm.com/2023/07/05/gly-july-insight/
27. Sheet1 – MarkLines, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.marklines.com/statics/oem_update/en/OEM_list_en_2024_01-03.xlsx
28. Customers – Magna International, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.magna.com/company/company-information/customers
29. MAPPED: The UK companies arming Israel, including producers for the F-35 combat aircraft, accessed February 1, 2026, https://caat.org.uk/data/countries/israel/mapped-all-the-uk-companies-manufacturing-components-for-israels-f35-combat-aircraft/
30. Aston Martin DB12 launch edition raises $1600000 at amfAR Gala Canne, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.astonmartin-israel.co.il/en/blogs/news/may-26-2023
31. UK-Israel Trade – Hansard, accessed February 1, 2026, https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-07-03/debates/75593B38-F8B9-4B15-875A-E3625CDEB51E/UK-IsraelTrade
32. Full text of “Financial Times , 1983, UK, English” – Internet Archive, accessed February 1, 2026, https://archive.org/stream/FinancialTimes1983UKEnglish/Feb%2009%201983%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2328995%2C%20UK%20%28en%29_djvu.txt
33. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed February 1, 2026, https://aubern.uk/
34. REVIEW AND REBUILD – Conservatives, accessed February 1, 2026, https://public.conservatives.com/static/documents/conference/2024/CPC24_Handbook-v5.pdf
35. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests Changes from 5 September 2022 to 3 October 2022 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?f=2022-10-03
36. SA Jews in the desert on Pesach – South African Jewish Report, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sajr.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/6-may-2016.pdf
37. NSSN 699: Unions must keep the pressure on for a real Workers’ New Deal, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.shopstewards.net/2024/10/nssn-699-unions-must-keep-the-pressure-on-for-a-real-workers-new-deal/
38. august 24 – Unite the Union, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.unitetheunion.org/media/hfph0gmv/facts-figures-august-2024-update.pdf
39. Open letter: Protest is not terrorism – Defend Palestine Action from proscription, accessed February 1, 2026, https://protestisnotterrorism.uk/2025/07/14/open-letter-protest-is-not-terrorism-defend-palestine-action-from-proscription/
40. Defend the right to protest: no ban on Palestine Action – open letter, accessed February 1, 2026, https://laborforpalestine.net/2025/06/27/defend-the-right-to-protest-no-ban-on-palestine-action-open-letter/
41. What does BDS even stand for?? : r/leagueoflegends – Reddit, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/12rh1wh/what_does_bds_even_stand_for/