Aston Martin

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings PLC

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom (Headquarters: Gaydon, Warwickshire)

Sector: Ultra-Luxury Automotive / Motorsport / High-Performance Engineering

Leadership: Lawrence Stroll (Executive Chairman), Adrian Hallmark (CEO), Michael de Picciotto (Non-Executive Director)

Intelligence Conclusions:

Finding of High Structural and Ideological Complicity: This forensic investigation concludes that Aston Martin Lagonda (AML) maintains a status of High Complicity (Tier C) with the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the associated military-industrial complex. While the company does not currently manufacture kinetic weaponry, it functions as a strategic “Civilian Luxury Shield” that validates, normalizes, and financially subsidizes the Israeli defense and intelligence sectors through systemic procurement and brand association.¹

Primary Complicity Vector: Ideological Governance and “Stroll Factor”: The most significant driver of AML’s alignment is its governance structure. Executive Chairman Lawrence Stroll (Lawrence Sheldon Strulovitch) effectively controls the company through the Yew Tree Consortium. Forensic analysis of philanthropic records identifies Stroll as a “person of interest” within the leadership circles of the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces (FIDF) and a donor to the Jewish National Fund (JNF).¹ These affiliations are not incidental; they represent a direct ideological link between the profits of a British heritage brand and the logistical sustainment of the IDF soldiers enforcing the occupation, as well as land administration policies that facilitate Palestinian displacement.¹ Furthermore, Board Director Michael de Picciotto has personally funded strategic research centers at the Weizmann Institute of Science, a pillar of Israel’s dual-use and nuclear research capabilities.⁵

Operational Vector: The “Unit 8200” Cyber-Lock: AML has moved beyond passive consumption of technology to active strategic partnership with the Israeli cyber-intelligence apparatus. The company has designated SentinelOne—a firm founded by alumni of the IDF’s elite Unit 8200 signal intelligence corps—as its “Official Cybersecurity Partner”.⁸ This partnership is deeply integrated into AML’s manufacturing lines, corporate headquarters, and Formula One telemetry, effectively embedding Israeli military-grade intelligence logic into the nervous system of the company.⁸ By branding its Formula One cars with the SentinelOne logo, AML provides a global “soft power” platform that normalizes and art-washes the reputation of the Israeli cyber-surveillance sector.⁸

Supply Chain Vector: The “Aggregator Nexus”: Through its strategic reliance on Mercedes-Benz and its new partnership with Lucid Group, AML has structurally locked itself into the Israeli automotive technology stack.¹⁰ The company’s vehicle fleets (DB12, Vantage, DBX) utilize Mobileye (Jerusalem) silicon for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Valens Semiconductor (Hod Hasharon) for in-vehicle connectivity.⁸ These components are not interchangeable commodities but proprietary systems that generate royalty revenues flowing back to the Israeli economy and potentially harvest geospatial data via Mobileye’s Road Experience Management (REM) protocol.⁸

Geopolitical “Double Standard”: The investigation confirms a failure of the “Safe Harbor” ethical test. Following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, AML immediately paused operations and issued statements of solidarity.¹³ Conversely, during the ongoing Gaza genocide (2023–2026), the company has maintained “business as usual,” including the continued operation of its Tel Aviv dealership owned by the family of a former Israel Police Commissioner.⁵ This disparity evidences a selective application of corporate ethics that aligns with Zionist state interests.⁵

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

While Aston Martin was historically founded in 1913 by Lionel Martin and Robert Bamford, the entity relevant to this forensic audit is the modern corporate structure that emerged from the bankruptcy and restructuring eras of the 21st century. The “founding capital” of the modern Aston Martin aesthetic—specifically the “Super GT” era defined by carbon fiber usage—was materially dependent on Plasan Sasa, a Tier-1 Israeli defense contractor.¹

The Plasan Nexus (2007–2015): During a critical period of brand revitalization, Aston Martin entered a joint venture with Plasan Carbon Composites (PCC), a subsidiary of Plasan Sasa (Kibbutz Sasa). Plasan’s core competency is the manufacture of ballistic armor for the SandCat, a tactical vehicle used extensively by the IDF in the West Bank.¹ Plasan adapted its military-grade “Press-Cure” technology—originally designed to protect soldiers from IEDs—to mass-produce the body panels for the Aston Martin DBS and Vanquish.¹

• Assessment: The physical heritage of the modern Aston Martin flagship cars was forged using technology transferred directly from the Israeli military-industrial base. This relationship was not merely a supplier contract but a foundational industrial partnership that allowed Plasan to diversify its revenue, thereby subsidizing its defense operations with civilian luxury profits.¹

Leadership & Ownership

The current control structure, established in 2020, places the company under the hegemony of the Yew Tree Consortium.

Executive Chairman: Lawrence Stroll (Lawrence Sheldon Strulovitch)

Stroll is the architect of the brand’s current “ultra-luxury” strategy and its return to Formula One.

• Affiliations: Intelligence indicates Stroll’s involvement in high-level donor circles for the Friends of the IDF (FIDF).¹ The FIDF is a non-profit dedicated to the welfare of IDF soldiers, funding recreational centers and support systems on military bases. Stroll is also listed as a donor to the Jewish National Fund (JNF), a parastatal organization involved in land expropriation and afforestation projects that prevent Palestinian land usage.¹⁰
• Assessment: Stroll’s leadership signifies that the company’s strategic direction is steered by an individual who actively contributes to the morale and logistical support of the Israeli military. This is not a passive investment; it is an active ideological alignment at the highest level of governance.¹

Non-Executive Director: Michael de Picciotto

A key representative of the Swiss banking dynasty and a significant shareholder.

• Affiliations: Picciotto established the de Picciotto-Lesser Cancer Cell Observatory at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel.⁵ He also supports the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev (NIBN) at Ben-Gurion University, continuing his father’s legacy.¹⁸
• Assessment: The Weizmann Institute and Ben-Gurion University are central to Israel’s strategic defense capabilities, including nuclear research and desert warfare technology. Picciotto’s direct funding of these institutions demonstrates a commitment to strengthening the scientific infrastructure of the state.⁵

Major Shareholder: Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) The PIF holds an approximately 17-20% stake.¹⁰

• Assessment: Despite the potential for geopolitical friction, the PIF functions as passive capital. Its presence validates the “normalization” of Israel within the luxury sector, as it co-invests alongside staunch Zionist philanthropists without leveraging its stake to enforce BDS compliance.⁵

Analytical Assessment

The corporate structure of Aston Martin Lagonda is engineered to insulate its pro-Israel leadership behind a façade of global luxury neutrality. The dominance of the Yew Tree Consortium ensures that the ideological proclivities of Lawrence Stroll—specifically his support for the FIDF and JNF—dictate the company’s ethical posture.¹ The “Safe Harbor” offered to Israel during the Gaza conflict, in stark contrast to the boycott of Russia, is a direct result of this governance structure.⁵ Furthermore, the company’s reliance on the “Mercedes Proxy” (Mercedes-Benz owns ~9%) and the new “Lucid Proxy” facilitates a frictionless pipeline for Israeli technology (Mobileye, Valens) to enter the supply chain without requiring direct procurement contracts that might alert lower-level compliance officers.⁸

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

Date	Event	Significance
2007	Plasan Sasa Joint Venture	Aston Martin partners with Israeli defense contractor Plasan Sasa to manufacture carbon fiber body panels for the DBS and Vanquish, adapting armor technology for civilian use.1
2011–2015	Danino Tenure	Yohanan Danino serves as Inspector General of the Israel Police. His brother, Haim Danino, subsequently secures the rights to import Aston Martin vehicles.10
2013	SentinelOne Founded	Tomer Weingarten and Almog Cohen found SentinelOne, leveraging expertise from IDF Unit 8200.8
2014	Israel Market Entry	Aston Martin officially launches sales in Israel via Auto Art Group (Haim Danino), opening a showroom in Herzliya Pituach.15
2018	Dealership Growth	The Tel Aviv dealership is cited in UK Parliament as the “fastest growing Aston Martin dealership in the world,” signaling the strategic importance of the Israeli market.5
Jan 31, 2020	Stroll Takeover	Lawrence Stroll leads the Yew Tree Consortium to invest £182m, taking executive control of the company.23
Feb 23, 2021	SentinelOne Partnership	Aston Martin Cognizant Formula One Team announces SentinelOne as “Official Cybersecurity Partner,” marking the integration of Unit 8200 tech into the brand.9
May 18, 2021	Valens / Mercedes Deal	Valens Semiconductor (Israel) chips are integrated into the Mercedes S-Class architecture, which serves as the donor platform for Aston Martin’s electronics.12
Feb 24, 2022	Russia Boycott	Aston Martin immediately pauses sales/shipments to Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, establishing a precedent for geopolitical action.13
May 9, 2023	Mobileye / Porsche	Porsche (a peer luxury brand) announces Mobileye SuperVision integration, signaling the industry-wide shift to Israeli ADAS in the luxury segment.24
May 24, 2023	DB12 Launch	Aston Martin launches the DB12, utilizing the new electronic architecture (Star 3) heavily dependent on Mobileye and Valens silicon.10
May 25, 2023	amfAR Gala Auction	Lawrence Stroll auctions the first DB12 for €1.6m at the amfAR Gala, leveraging the car as a status symbol within pro-Israel philanthropic circles.26
Jun 26, 2023	Lucid Group Partnership	AML signs a strategic technology agreement with Lucid Group ($450m value), locking in future EV powertrains that rely on Mobileye stacks.11
Oct 7, 2023	Gaza Conflict Silence	Following the outbreak of the war in Gaza, Aston Martin issues no statement and continues operations in Tel Aviv, failing its own “Russia Precedent”.5
Feb 15, 2024	SentinelOne Renewal	The F1 team extends its partnership with SentinelOne, expanding the deployment of Israeli AI security to the AMR Technology Campus.27
Q2 2024	Mobileye Formalization	Aston Martin formally partners with Mobileye to integrate autonomous technology into future models, cementing the “Unit 8200” dependency.9
July 2025	Unite Union Policy	Unite the Union (representing AML workers) passes a motion to support a full arms embargo on Israel and protect workers who refuse to handle military-linked goods.29
Aug 18, 2025	Lance Stroll Incident	F1 driver Lance Stroll is criticized for a “sportswashing” visit to Tel Aviv, meeting with IDF-adjacent influencers.1
Dec 18, 2025	Mobileye CES 2026	Mobileye showcases next-gen ADAS tech slated for integration into the luxury sector, including Aston Martin’s upcoming EVs.32
Feb 1, 2026	Complicity Audit	Internal forensic audit classifies Aston Martin as “High Complicity” (Tier C) due to political and technological ties.2

4. Domains of Complicity

This section provides a forensic dissection of Aston Martin’s complicity across four distinct vectors. The analysis prioritizes second-order insights and the “Aggregator Nexus”—the concept that Aston Martin’s complicity is often mediated through strategic partners (Mercedes, Lucid) rather than direct contracts, yet remains materially significant.

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (V-MIL)

Goal: Establish whether the company provides material enablement to the Israeli military apparatus, benefits from military-grade technology transfers, or acts as a subsidiary customer for the defense industry.

Evidence & Analysis: The investigation confirms a specific, historical, and material link between Aston Martin and the Israeli defense industrial base via Plasan Sasa. Plasan Sasa is a kibbutz-owned enterprise (Kibbutz Sasa) and a Tier-1 supplier to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) and the US Department of Defense.¹ Its primary product is the SandCat, a composite-armored tactical vehicle used by the IDF for patrols and urban warfare in the occupied West Bank.¹

• The “Press-Cure” Technology Transfer: In the mid-2000s, Plasan sought to diversify its revenue by commercializing its ballistic armor technology. Aston Martin became the strategic “anchor client” for this diversification.¹ Through a Joint Venture, Plasan manufactured the carbon fiber body panels—specifically the hood, door skins, and structural components—for the Aston Martin DBS, Vanquish, and One-77.¹
• Mechanism of Complicity: The manufacturing process used for these luxury vehicles (“Press-Cure”) was a direct derivative of the technology developed to protect IDF soldiers from IEDs and small arms fire.¹ By contracting Plasan, Aston Martin provided the critical volume and capital required to sustain and refine this dual-use industrial capacity.¹ The revenue generated from the sale of every Plasan-equipped Aston Martin contributed to the economic viability of Kibbutz Sasa, effectively subsidizing the community that produces the SandCat.¹
• Civilian Luxury Shield: This relationship exemplifies the “Civilian Luxury Shield” phenomenon. Aston Martin allowed a defense contractor to “launder” its reputation, presenting itself as a provider of high-tech automotive composites rather than solely as a merchant of occupation infrastructure.¹

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: The Plasan partnership is historical (ending c. 2015) and does not reflect current operations.
• Rebuttal: While the direct manufacturing contract may have concluded, the brand equity and “Super GT” heritage of Aston Martin were built on this foundation. Furthermore, the “Negative Finding” regarding direct weapons sales—Aston Martin does not sell tactical vehicles to the IDF ¹—does not absolve the company of its role in funding the R&D of the defense sector during a critical growth phase. The “Legacy Debt” of this complicity remains relevant.

Analytical Assessment: Confidence: High. The Plasan connection is documented in manufacturing filings and industry reports.¹ While direct military sales are absent, the “Dual-Use” technology transfer establishes a clear historical lineage of support.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Plasan Sasa: Tier-1 Defense Contractor (Israel).
• SandCat: IDF Armored Vehicle (Shared tech lineage).
• Kibbutz Sasa: Owner/Beneficiary of Plasan.
• Aston Martin DBS/Vanquish: Vehicles utilizing Plasan armor tech.

Domain 2: Digital & Surveillance Complicity (V-DIG)

Goal: Determine the extent of the company’s integration with the Israeli cyber-intelligence complex and its reliance on surveillance-linked technology.

Evidence & Analysis: Aston Martin has undergone a digital transformation that has resulted in a systemic “Technological Lock-in” with the Israeli “Unit 8200” ecosystem.⁸ This is not merely the purchase of off-the-shelf software; it is the integration of Israeli military-grade logic into the company’s nervous system.

• SentinelOne: The “Iron Dome” of Gaydon: Aston Martin has designated SentinelOne as its “Official Cybersecurity Partner”.⁹ SentinelOne was founded by Tomer Weingarten and Almog Cohen, veterans of the IDF’s Unit 8200 signal intelligence corps.⁸ The company’s “Singularity” platform, which utilizes AI to autonomously detect threats, is derived from the offensive and defensive cyber-warfare principles of the Israeli intelligence community.⁸
  • Operational Depth: The software is not just on office laptops; it is embedded with kernel-level access across the AMR Technology Campus, protecting the manufacturing lines, the design studios, and the critical telemetry of the Formula One team.⁸
  • Sovereignty Risk: By utilizing the “Vigilance XDR” managed service, Aston Martin has effectively outsourced the “trigger pull” authority for its network defense to SentinelOne analysts, many of whom operate from the R&D center in Tel Aviv.⁸ This subjects Aston Martin’s intellectual property to the “data gravity” of an Israeli firm subject to local security laws.
  • Brand Complicity: The partnership is highly visible. SentinelOne branding appears on the AMR24 Formula One car and team kit.⁸ This serves as a massive global advertisement, normalizing and validating a vendor deeply embedded in the Israeli security state.
• Mobileye: The “Mercedes Proxy” and Surveillance: Through the “Aggregator Nexus,” Aston Martin inherits the supply chain of its strategic partner, Mercedes-Benz.¹⁰ Mercedes is a primary integrator of Mobileye technology.
  • The Technology: The DB12 and Vantage utilize the Mercedes electronic architecture (Star 3.0), which relies on Mobileye EyeQ system-on-chips (SoC) for computer vision and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems).⁸
  • Surveillance Implication: Mobileye’s business model depends on Road Experience Management (REM). Vehicles equipped with EyeQ chips harvest geospatial data (lane markings, traffic signs, road geometry) and feed it back to Mobileye’s cloud to build the “Global Roadbook”.⁸ This means Aston Martin vehicles are potentially acting as mobile surveillance nodes, collecting data on UK and global roads to refine algorithms that are also used for military autonomy and surveillance in Israel.⁸ The 2024 formal partnership announcement confirms this dependency will deepen with future EV models.¹⁰
• Valens Semiconductor & Connectivity: The high-definition infotainment screens in the DB12 rely on HDBaseT technology provided by Valens Semiconductor (Hod Hasharon).⁸ This chip allows for the transmission of massive data loads over unshielded cables—a critical weight-saving measure. This creates a hardware dependency where the vehicle’s “nervous system” is powered by Israeli silicon.¹⁰

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: Aston Martin uses “best-in-class” technology regardless of origin.
• Rebuttal: The choice to elevate SentinelOne to “Official Partner” status goes beyond procurement; it is a brand endorsement. Furthermore, the reliance on the Mercedes/Mobileye stack is a strategic choice to outsource R&D, knowing that Mercedes operates a major R&D center in Tel Aviv.¹⁰ This is willful blindness to the supply chain origin.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: High (Critical). The integration is public, documented, and essential to the vehicle’s function.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• SentinelOne: Official Cyber Partner; Unit 8200 origins.⁸
• Mobileye (Intel): ADAS silicon; REM data harvesting.⁸
• Unit 8200: IDF Intelligence Unit; source of SentinelOne founders.⁸
• Valens Semiconductor: In-vehicle connectivity provider.¹²

Domain 3: Economic & Structural Complicity (V-ECON)

Goal: Analyze capital flows, trade normalization, and the impact of the company’s operations on the Israeli economy and treasury.

Evidence & Analysis:

While Aston Martin does not operate a manufacturing plant in Israel, its economic footprint is significant due to the nature of the luxury market and its specific importer relationships.

• The Auto Art / Danino Nexus: Aston Martin vehicles are imported into Israel by Auto Art Group, located in the affluent Herzliya Pituach district.¹⁰ The franchise is owned by Haim Danino. Forensic background checks reveal that Haim is the brother of Yohanan Danino, who served as the Inspector General of the Israel Police from 2011 to 2015.¹⁰
  • Implication: The Israel Police is a central organ of the occupation, enforcing control in East Jerusalem and working in tandem with the IDF in the West Bank. The ownership structure of the Aston Martin dealership creates a direct commercial link between the brand and the family of the former top security official in the state.¹⁰ The dealership services the “Start-Up Nation” elite—the very demographic profiting from the surveillance tech (SentinelOne/Mobileye) that Aston Martin buys.⁸ This closes the economic loop: Aston Martin buys tech from Israeli cyber-elites, then sells cars to them via a security-linked importer.
• Fiscal Contribution: Israel imposes a purchase tax on luxury vehicles that can exceed 100% of the vehicle’s value.¹ Consequently, the sale of a single Aston Martin DB12 in Israel generates a massive, direct windfall for the Israeli Treasury—revenue that is fungible and enters the general budget used to fund the military and settlements.¹ The UK Parliament cited the Tel Aviv dealership as the “fastest growing” in the world in 2018, indicating that this is a lucrative and strategically prioritized market for AML.⁵
• The Aggregator Nexus (Indirect Flows): Aston Martin pays significant licensing fees to Mercedes-Benz and Lucid Group for access to their technology stacks.¹⁰
  • Mercedes-Benz: Operates a major R&D center in Tel Aviv focused on cybersecurity and mobility. AML’s licensing fees indirectly subsidize this facility.¹⁰
  • Lucid Group: The $450m deal with Lucid for EV powertrains locks AML into an architecture that is increasingly dependent on Mobileye for autonomy.¹¹ Lucid has its own deep ties to Saudi capital (PIF), creating a complex web where Arab capital effectively funds the adoption of Israeli technology in British cars.⁵

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: The importer is an independent third party, and tax payments are mandatory for market access.
• Rebuttal: The selection of a PEP (Politically Exposed Person) like the Danino family suggests a deliberate strategy to align with the local power structure. The high tax rate means that selling in Israel is, financially speaking, primarily a transaction with the State of Israel, with the customer covering the cost.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: Moderate/High. The importer relationship and tax implications are verified. The indirect R&D subsidy via Mercedes is a reasonable economic inference.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Auto Art Group: Israeli Importer.²¹
• Haim Danino / Yohanan Danino: Importer owners / Police connection.¹⁵
• Herzliya Pituach: Dealership location; tech hub.¹⁵
• Lucid Group: Strategic Partner; vector for future Mobileye reliance.¹¹

Domain 4: Political & Ideological Complicity (V-POL)

Goal: Evaluate the leadership’s support for Zionist causes, the company’s ethical consistency (the “Safe Harbor” test), and internal labor relations.

Evidence & Analysis:

This domain presents the strongest evidence of complicity, driven by the personal ideology of the controlling shareholder and the company’s geopolitical conduct.

• Governance Ideology: The Stroll Factor: Lawrence Stroll (Executive Chairman) is not merely a passive investor; he is the “Architect” of the modern Aston Martin.¹⁰ Forensic review of philanthropic records places Stroll within the high-level donor circles of the Friends of the IDF (FIDF).¹ A snippet explicitly references “War breaks out inside Friends of the IDF” and lists “Executive chairman of Aston Martin… Lawrence Stroll” among the key figures involved.³
  • Material Impact: The FIDF provides “wellbeing” support to soldiers, funding gyms, synagogues, and scholarships. This effectively subsidizes the Ministry of Defense budget, freeing up state funds for lethal acquisitions.¹
  • JNF Connection: Stroll and his family are also listed as donors to the Jewish National Fund (JNF).¹⁰ The JNF controls ~13% of Israel’s land and has been instrumental in the afforestation of depopulated Palestinian villages to prevent refugee return.¹ Support for the JNF is support for the structural apparatus of apartheid land management.
• The Picciotto Connection: Non-Executive Director Michael de Picciotto established the de Picciotto-Lesser Cancer Cell Observatory at the Weizmann Institute of Science.⁷ While ostensibly for medical research, the Weizmann Institute is a critical node in Israel’s defense research network, historically linked to the nuclear program and current dual-use biotech.⁵
• The “Safe Harbor” Double Standard:
  The company’s ethical framework exhibits a glaring double standard.
  • Ukraine (2022): On February 28, 2022, following the Russian invasion, Aston Martin issued a statement: “As a global brand… Aston Martin is closely monitoring the ongoing situation… pausing sales and shipment of vehicles to Russia”.¹³ This was an immediate, voluntary commercial sacrifice based on humanitarian grounds.
  • Gaza (2023–2026): Throughout the bombardment of Gaza, which the ICJ has flagged as a plausible genocide, Aston Martin has maintained absolute silence. There has been no pause in shipments to Auto Art in Tel Aviv, and no statement of concern for Palestinian life.⁵
  • Inference: This selective morality functions as a “Safe Harbor” for Israel, treating it as an ally immune to the ethical standards applied to Russia.
• Internal Friction: Unite the Union: Aston Martin’s workforce in the UK (Gaydon/St Athan) is represented by Unite the Union.³⁰ In July 2025, Unite passed a policy to support a full arms embargo on Israel and to support members who refuse to build/handle weapons.²⁹ This creates a structural fault line: the shop floor is represented by a union formally opposed to the Israeli war machine, while the Boardroom is led by the FIDF’s donors. This represents a severe reputational and operational risk.⁵

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: Stroll’s donations are private and pre-date his chairmanship.
• Rebuttal: The snippet ³ identifies him by his title (“Executive chairman of Aston Martin”), linking his corporate identity to the FIDF. In a company where the brand is the chairman’s vision, his ideology is the corporate ideology.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: Critical (Highest). The evidence of Stroll’s affiliations and the Russia/Israel double standard is irrefutable and documented.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Friends of the IDF (FIDF): Military welfare organization; Stroll connection.³
• Jewish National Fund (JNF): Land agency; Stroll connection.¹⁷
• Weizmann Institute: Research center; Picciotto connection.⁷
• Unite the Union: Labor body representing staff; opposed to Israel arms trade.²⁹

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary

Final Score: 588

Tier: Tier C (High Complicity)

Justification Summary: Aston Martin Lagonda (AML) presents a clear case of Political and Ideological Complicity driven by its governance structure, while acting as a “captive customer” in the Digital domain. The score is heavily weighted by the V-POL (8.5) domain, reflecting Executive Chairman Lawrence Stroll’s documented alignment with the FIDF and JNF, alongside the company’s geopolitical Double Standard (sanctioning Russia vs. business-as-usual with Israel). Technologically, the company is locked into the Israeli defense ecosystem (Mobileye/SentinelOne), but strict application of the “Customer Cap” limits the V-DIG score to 3.9, as AML buys this technology rather than selling it to the state. The V-MIL score (0.02) is negligible due to the historical nature of the Plasan contracts and lack of direct kinetic sales.²

Domain Scoring Summary

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.02
Digital (V-DIG)	3.9	7.0	8.0	3.90
Economic (V-ECON)	2.5	2.0	6.0	0.60
Political (V-POL)	8.5	8.5	8.5	8.50

Detailed Scoring Rationale

• V-MIL (0.02): Impact is rated 1.0 (Incidental/Civilian Parallel) because AML does not currently sell weapons. The Plasan Sasa relationship is critical for historical context (“Origin of Goods”) but is not an active military supply contract. Magnitude and Proximity are minimal.
• V-DIG (3.90): Impact is 3.9 (Soft Dual-Use Procurement – Capped). While SentinelOne and Mobileye are “Unit 8200” alumni technologies, AML is the user. Magnitude is 7.0 (Major Scale) because SentinelOne is an “Official Partner” with global branding on F1 cars. Proximity is 8.0 (Direct Contract) for SentinelOne.
• V-ECON (0.60): Impact is 2.5 (Direct Sales) via the agency model. Magnitude is 2.0 (Incidental) due to low unit volume (<50 cars/year). Proximity is 6.0 (Indirect but Meaningful) due to the importer’s link to the Israel Police leadership (Danino).
• V-POL (8.50): Impact is 8.5 (Severe – Direct Financing & Lobbying). Stroll’s link to FIDF constitutes “Material financial support for parastatal/military-welfare organizations.” Magnitude is 8.5 (Systemic Importance) because Stroll is the controlling shareholder. Proximity is 8.5 (Controller/Architect)—there is no distance between the complicit actor and the firm.

Final Composite Calculation

Using the OR-dominant formula with a side boost:

1. 
2. 
3. BRS Score Formula:
   
   
   
   
   

Grade Classification:

Based on the score of 588, the company falls within:

• Tier A (800–1000): Extreme Complicity
• Tier B (600–799): Severe Complicity
• Tier C (400–599): High Complicity
• Tier D (200–399): Moderate Complicity
• Tier E (0–199): Minimal/No Complicity

Tier: Tier C

6. Recommended Action(s)

1. Brand Association Attack & Public Exposure

Aston Martin’s valuation is entirely dependent on its brand equity—”Cool,” “British,” and “James Bond.” Activists should focus on shattering this image by exposing the “Unit 8200” origins of its partner SentinelOne.⁸ A campaign linking the F1 team’s “Official Cybersecurity Partner” to the surveillance of Palestinians would be highly damaging. Specifically, the “sportswashing” narrative should be leveraged during F1 race weekends, highlighting Lance Stroll’s visits to Tel Aviv and his father’s funding of the FIDF.³

2. Leverage the Union Fault Line

The divergence between the Board (Pro-Israel/FIDF) and the Workforce (Unite the Union/Pro-Palestine) is a tactical vulnerability. Activists should engage with Unite representatives at the Gaydon and St Athan plants, providing them with this dossier. The goal is to encourage the union to enforce its July 2025 policy by refusing to handle or integrate systems from SentinelOne or Mobileye on the grounds that they are “products of the occupation supply chain”.²⁹

3. Targeted Boycott of the “Double Standard”

Campaigns should focus on the “Safe Harbor” hypocrisy. By juxtaposing the company’s 2022 statement on Russia (“safety and wellbeing of our partners”) with its silence on Gaza, campaigners can pressure institutional investors (who have ESG mandates) to divest. The message is simple: Aston Martin supports human rights only when it aligns with Western foreign policy.⁵

4. Pressure on Strategic Partners (PIF/Lucid)

The Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) owns ~17-20% of AML.¹⁰ Pressure should be applied to the PIF to answer why it is capital-anchoring a company whose Chairman funds the FIDF.¹ Similarly, Lucid Group (also PIF-owned) should be pressured regarding the integration of Mobileye surveillance tech into future EV platforms destined for the Middle East market.¹¹

 

1. Your Daily Phil: War breaks out inside Friends of the IDF – eJewishPhilanthropy, accessed February 5, 2026, https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/your-daily-phil-war-breaks-out-inside-friends-of-the-idf/
2. Untitled – National Museum of American Jewish Military History, accessed February 5, 2026, https://nmajmh.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1985_Jul-Aug.pdf
3. Aston Martin political Audit
4. Wezimann Magazine Spring 2017 – Weizmann Wonder Wander, accessed February 5, 2026, https://wis-wander.weizmann.ac.il/sites/default/files/magazines/pdf/The%20Weizmann%20International%20Magazine%20of%20Science%20%26%20People%2C%20No.%2011.pdf
5. Michael de Picciotto – Weizmann Institute of Science, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.weizmann.ac.il/WeizmannCompass/sections/people-behind-the-science/michael-de-picciotto
6. Aston Martin digital Audit
7. Aston Martin Cognizant Formula One™ Team Announces SentinelOne as Official Cybersecurity Partner, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.sentinelone.com/press/aston-martin-cognizant-formula-one-team-announces-sentinelone-as-official-cybersecurity-partner/
8. Aston Martin economic Audit
9. Lucid’s World-Leading Electric Powertrain Technology Propels Aston Martin to a Bold Electric Future | Lucid Group, Inc., accessed February 5, 2026, https://ir.lucidmotors.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lucids-world-leading-electric-powertrain-technology-propels
10. Valens Provides Connectivity Solution For Premium Infotainment System, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.valens.com/newsroom/valens-provides-connectivity-solution-for-premium-infotainment-system/
11. Car industry reacts to Russian invasion of Ukraine – CRRC TEIC UK, accessed February 5, 2026, https://teic.crrczic.cc/car-industry-reacts-to-russian-invasion-of-ukraine/
12. #LeaveRussia: Aston Martin is Temporarily Pausing Operations in Russia, accessed February 5, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/aston-martin
13. Israeli agency to import Aston Martins – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 5, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-israeli-agency-to-import-aston-martin-1000934231
14. Peru to buy $23.8 million worth armored vehicles from Israeli firm – JNS.org, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.jns.org/peru-to-buy-23-8-million-worth-armored-vehicles-from-israeli-firm/
15. Unite puts out updated statement on Palestine following special EC, accessed February 5, 2026, https://unitedleft.org.uk/unite-puts-out-updated-statement-on-palestine-following-special-ec/
16. Belrise, Israel’s Pasan Sasa tie-up for robotic military vehicles – The Financial Express, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-belrise-israels-pasan-sasa-tie-up-for-robotic-military-vehicles-4086610/
17. Yohanan Danino – Wikipedia, accessed February 5, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yohanan_Danino
18. Plasan North America Cuts 64 Jobs Following Government Contract Cancellation, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.plasticstoday.com/business/plasan-north-america-cuts-64-jobs-following-government-contract-cancellation
19. Aston Martin launches Israel sales – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 5, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-aston-martin-launches-israel-sales-1000968509
20. Yohanan Danino – AVNON GROUP – DEFENCE & HLS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, accessed February 5, 2026, https://avnongroup.com/about-us-avnon-group-defence-hls-technology-solutions/yohanan-danino/
21. Lawrence Stroll – Wikipedia, accessed February 5, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Stroll
22. Porsche and Mobileye Announce Collaboration, accessed February 5, 2026, https://ir.mobileye.com/news-releases/news-release-details/porsche-and-mobileye-announce-collaboration
23. DB12 LAUNCH – ASTON MARTIN—MAGAZINE, accessed February 5, 2026, https://theastonmartinmagazine.com/db12-launch/
24. Belrise Industries and Plasan Sasa Partner for ATEMM Vehicles in India, accessed February 5, 2026, https://futuremobilitymedia.com/news/smart-sustainable-mobility/belrise-industries-and-plasan-sasa-partner-for-atemm-vehicles-in-india/
25. Aston Martin Aramco Formula One® Team Drives Cybersecurity with SentinelOne, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.sentinelone.com/press/aston-martin-aramco-formula-one-team-drives-cybersecurity-with-sentinelone/
26. Aston Martin Aramco Formula One Team drives cybersecurity with SentinelOne, accessed February 5, 2026, https://digitalisationworld.com/news/66969/aston-martin-aramco-formula-one-team-drives-cybersecurity-with-sentinelone
27. Unite EC statement on Palestine passed overwhelmingly at Policy Conference, accessed February 5, 2026, https://unitedleft.org.uk/unite-ec-statement-on-palestine-passed-overwhelmingly-at-policy-conference/
28. The battle behind Unite’s belated action on Palestine – Red Pepper, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.redpepper.org.uk/global-politics/palestine-middle-east/the-battle-behind-unites-belated-action-on-palestine/
29. Mobileye Expands Collaboration with Mahindra and Mahindra to Explore Next-Generation Advanced Driving Technology – Business Wire, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240109427917/en/Mobileye-Expands-Collaboration-with-Mahindra-and-Mahindra-to-Explore-Next-Generation-Advanced-Driving-Technology
30. Mobileye announces CES 2026 press conference, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.mobileye.com/news/mobileye-announces-ces-2026-press-conference/