Burberry Military Audit

Operational Overview and Audit Framework

1.1. Strategic Intent and Scope

This report constitutes a comprehensive forensic audit of Burberry Group plc (LSE: BRBY), conducted under the parameters of a Defense Logistics Analysis. The primary objective is to map, document, and stratify evidence regarding the entity’s potential material or ideological support for the State of Israel, its military apparatus (IDF), and the settlement enterprise within the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

The scope of this audit extends beyond direct transactional evidence to encompass second-tier and third-tier supply chain dependencies, licensing agreements, downstream retail distribution, and corporate ownership structures. As per the defined intelligence requirements, this analysis distinguishes between “meaningful complicity”—defined as systemic, material, or ideological integration into the occupation economy—and “incidental association,” which characterizes the inevitable friction of globalized commerce.

The analysis is structured around four critical intelligence vectors:

1. Direct Defense Contracting: Verification of tender awards or direct supply to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).
2. Dual-Use & Tactical Supply: Assessment of “ruggedized” or mil-spec product variants and their availability to Israeli security forces.
3. Supply Chain Integration: Identification of dependencies on Israeli manufacturers operating within illegal settlements or providing components to defense primes.
4. Logistical & Ideological Sustainment: Evaluation of leadership stances, philanthropic flows, and retail operations that normalize or sustain the settlement enterprise.

1.2. Methodology and Intelligence Limitations

The intelligence gathered for this report is derived from open-source intelligence (OSINT), corporate financial disclosures, supply chain transparency reports, non-governmental organization (NGO) databases (e.g., Who Profits), and global trade repositories.

It is critical to note that while direct “smoking gun” evidence of defense contracting is the highest standard of complicity, the modern defense logistics landscape often operates through intermediaries, dual-use commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) procurement, and subsidiary holding companies. Therefore, this audit places significant weight on the structural relationships between Burberry and its Israeli partners—specifically Delta Galil Industries and Factory 54 (Irani Corp)—as these entities serve as the primary conduits for the brand’s integration into the local economy.

The audit utilizes a stratification model to categorize findings:

• Tier 1 (Direct Complicity): Direct contracts with IMOD/IDF or operations on contested land owned directly by Burberry.
• Tier 2 (Supply Chain Complicity): Reliance on suppliers or distributors who are active participants in the settlement economy or defense sector.
• Tier 3 (Ideological/Financial Complicity): Ownership or licensing structures where revenue streams support Zionist philanthropic or political objectives.

2. Assessment of Direct Defense Contracting and Tactical Supply

2.1. The “IDF Uniform” Allegation: Forensic Verification

A primary intelligence requirement was to investigate persistent online associations between the search terms “Burberry” and “IDF Uniform.” This association often appears in algorithmic searches and e-commerce aggregators, necessitating a forensic verification to determine if a material contract exists.

Intelligence Findings:

Systematic analysis of procurement databases and commercial marketplaces indicates that the association between Burberry and IDF uniforms is a false positive generated by e-commerce search algorithms rather than evidence of a procurement contract.

• Algorithmic Aggregation: Snippets ¹ and ² from platforms like eBay and Walmart display search results where “Burberry” items appear alongside “IDF Uniforms” or “Tactical Gear.” This is a result of keyword stuffing by third-party sellers or platform categorization logic that groups “Clothing” and “Military Surplus” broadly. There is no individual listing for a “Burberry IDF Uniform” or any official tender document linking the two.
• Product Specification Analysis: Burberry’s current product portfolio is exclusively focused on luxury civilian apparel. The manufacturing specifications for IDF uniforms—requiring specific textile blends for durability, infrared signature reduction, and camouflage patterns (Olive Green for ground forces)—do not match Burberry’s manufacturing output, which focuses on gabardine, cashmere, and silk.³
• Absence of Tender Awards: A review of IMOD procurement disclosures and the SIBAT (International Defense Cooperation Directorate of the Israel Ministry of Defense) directory reveals no entry for Burberry Group plc or its subsidiaries. The brand is not a registered defense supplier.

2.2. The Trench Coat Legacy and Dual-Use Potential

The user query necessitates an investigation into “purpose-built” military supply versus “off-the-shelf” civilian sales. Burberry presents a unique case due to its historical origin as a military supplier.

Historical Context:

The Burberry trench coat was originally designed for the British War Office during the First World War, with “trench” referring specifically to its combat utility. The fabric, gabardine, was invented by Thomas Burberry to provide weather resistance without the weight of rubberized coats, a distinct tactical advantage in 1914.

Current Operational Status:

Despite this lineage, the modern Burberry trench coat has been fully demilitarized.

• Tactical Assessment: Current iterations lack the “ruggedized” features required for modern combat (e.g., ballistic protection, MOLLE webbing, flame retardancy).
• Market Positioning: The brand explicitly positions its outerwear as “luxury heritage” rather than “tactical utility”.³
• Conclusion on Dual-Use: There is no evidence that Burberry markets its current trench coats or any other apparel to the Israeli security forces as “tactical” gear. Any acquisition of Burberry items by Israeli personnel would be strictly private, individual purchase of civilian goods (COTS) and not part of an institutional supply chain.

2.3. “Made in Israel” Vintage Logistics

While current production is not military-oriented, forensic review of secondary markets ⁴ confirms a historical manufacturing footprint within Israel.

• Evidence: Vintage Burberry items, specifically leather trench coats and skirts from the late 20th century, bear authentic “Made in Israel” labels.
• Logistical Implication: This establishes that Burberry previously utilized Israel as a manufacturing hub, likely during the period when Israel’s textile industry was a dominant exporter to the West (prior to the migration of the industry to Jordan, Egypt, and Turkey).
• Relevance: While this does not indicate current military complicity, it demonstrates a legacy of commercial integration. These supply lines have largely been superseded by global sourcing, but the relationships forged during this era often evolve into the licensing and distribution partnerships seen today (discussed in Section 3).

3. Supply Chain Integration: The Delta Galil Nexus

The most significant finding of this audit—and the primary vector of “Meaningful Complicity”—is Burberry’s documented integration with Delta Galil Industries Ltd. This relationship moves the assessment from theoretical risk to confirmed material support for an entity listed by the United Nations for its involvement in the settlement enterprise.

3.1. Profile of the Partner: Delta Galil Industries

Delta Galil is not a passive actor; it is a Tier-1 Israeli industrial conglomerate and one of the largest global manufacturers of intimate apparel. Its involvement in the occupation is well-documented and systemic.

Complicity Indicators:

• UN Database Listing: Delta Galil was included in the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) database of business enterprises involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.⁷ The specific criteria for inclusion involve the provision of services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements.
• Settlement Operations: The company has operated a warehouse and sewing factory in the Barkan Industrial Zone.⁸
  • Geopolitical Context: The Barkan Industrial Zone is located in the West Bank, near the settlement of Ariel. It is built on occupied Palestinian land. Industrial zones like Barkan offer Israeli companies tax incentives and lax environmental regulations while exploiting Palestinian labor. They are considered integral to the economic viability of the settlement blocs.
• Retail Normalization: Through its subsidiary Delta Israel Brands, the company operates retail locations in neighborhoods considered by the international community to be illegal settlements, including Pisgat Zeev, Ramot, and Maale Adumim.⁸

3.2. Nature of the Burberry-Delta Relationship

Burberry does not merely buy off-the-shelf products from Delta Galil; the relationship is characterized by deep supply chain integration and executive interlock.

Evidence of Sourcing:

• Direct Manufacturing: Industry sustainability reports and supply chain disclosures explicitly list Burberry as a brand “selling and/or manufacturing with Delta Galil”.⁸
• Product Categories: Delta Galil specializes in seamless knitting, intimate apparel, and activewear. It is highly probable that Burberry’s underwear, socks, and loungewear lines are produced in Delta facilities.
• Executive Interlock: The strength of the relationship is evidenced by the movement of senior leadership between the two entities. Iric Browndorf, who serves as Executive Vice President of Global Sourcing & Production for Delta Galil, previously held the position of Sales Director at Burberry Ltd..⁹
  • Significance: Such high-level personnel transfers suggest a strategic partnership rather than a transactional vendor-buyer relationship. Mr. Browndorf’s knowledge of Burberry’s internal sourcing requirements likely facilitates the continued awarding of contracts to Delta Galil.

3.3. Manufacturing Locations and the “Fungibility of Capital”

A critical defense often employed by multinational brands is that their specific orders are fulfilled in a supplier’s “clean” factories (e.g., in Turkey, Egypt, or East Asia) rather than in controversial locations like the West Bank. Delta Galil possesses a global manufacturing footprint, with major facilities in Turkey, Egypt, and Vietnam.¹⁰

Forensic Rebuttal:

From a Defense Logistics perspective, the specific location of the stitching is secondary to the flow of capital.

• Revenue Fungibility: When Burberry pays Delta Galil for a production run of socks manufactured in Turkey, that revenue enters Delta Galil’s general corporate treasury. This treasury funds the company’s overall operations, including the rent paid to the Barkan Industrial Zone administration, the taxes paid to settlement regional councils, and the salaries of staff operating stores in Maale Adumim.
• Corporate Subsidization: Therefore, Burberry’s contract materially subsidizes Delta Galil’s settlement operations. The brand acts as a key client for a company that the UN has designated as complicit in the occupation. This is a Tier-2 complicity finding of “High” significance.

3.4. Delta Israel Brands: The Hidden Licensee?

Financial holding data indicates that Delta Israel Brands (the retail arm of Delta Galil) appears in investment baskets alongside Burberry.¹¹ While Factory 54 (discussed below) is the primary fashion distributor, Delta Israel Brands is the dominant player in the intimates market.

• Hypothesis: It is highly likely that Delta Israel Brands holds the specific distribution license for Burberry Underwear and Intimates in Israel.
• Implication: If true, this means a direct subsidiary of a UN-listed settlement company is the official face of the Burberry brand for a specific product category.

4. Downstream Logistics: Retail Distribution and Normalization

The “Last Mile” of Burberry’s logistics chain in Israel involves the distribution, marketing, and sale of goods. This stage involves significant friction with the geopolitical realities of the occupation, particularly regarding the status of Jerusalem and the West Bank.

4.1. The Official Distributor: Factory 54 (Irani Corp)

Burberry does not operate corporate-owned stores in Israel. Instead, it utilizes a franchise model, granting exclusive rights to Factory 54, a subsidiary of the Irani Corporation.¹³ Factory 54 is the premier luxury fashion retailer in Israel, managing the in-country presence for brands like Armani, Valentino, and Burberry.

Operational Profile:

• Role: Factory 54 acts as the importer of record, manages retail real estate, and executes marketing campaigns. They are the “boots on the ground” for Burberry.
• Complicity Risk: By outsourcing operations to a local partner, Burberry attempts to insulate itself from local political risk. However, the actions of the franchisee are contractually authorized by the brand owner.

4.2. The Mamilla Mall Flashpoint

Factory 54 operates a flagship location (potentially multi-brand or shop-in-shop) in the Alrov Mamilla Avenue shopping center.¹⁵

Geopolitical Forensics of Mamilla:

• Location: The Mamilla Mall is built on the “seam line” between West and East Jerusalem. Historically, this area was the “No Man’s Land” designated by the 1949 Armistice Agreements between Israel and Jordan.
• Legal Status: Under international law, the status of this territory is contested. The mall’s construction and integration into the Jerusalem municipality infrastructure are viewed by Palestinians and international legal scholars as part of the de facto annexation of East Jerusalem.
• Normalization: The mall is designed to seamlessly connect the Jewish West Jerusalem city center with the Old City (Jaffa Gate), effectively erasing the Green Line in the urban landscape.
• Burberry’s Role: By maintaining a retail presence in Mamilla (via Factory 54), Burberry participates in the commercial normalization of this annexed territory. The store serves as an anchor for high-end commerce in a zone that is central to the dispute over Jerusalem’s sovereignty.

4.3. Logistics to Settlements

Investigation into Factory 54’s logistics network reveals that the distributor facilitates e-commerce deliveries to illegal settlements.

• Evidence: Reports from activist groups monitoring luxury brands (specifically regarding Lululemon, also distributed by Irani Corp) indicate that Factory 54’s online platform processes orders and ships to addresses in the West Bank and Golan Heights settlements.¹⁷
• Sustainment: This logistical capability provides “lifestyle sustainment” for the settler population. Access to global luxury goods without needing to cross checkpoints into Israel proper is a component of “normalizing” life in the settlements. It allows the settler population to enjoy the same consumer privileges as residents of Tel Aviv, reinforcing the permanence of the settlement enterprise.

4.4. Travel Retail and The Airport Economy

Burberry fragrances and accessories are retailed at Ben Gurion Airport by James Richardson, the duty-free concessionaire.¹⁸

• State Revenue: Duty-free operations are contractually tied to the Israel Airports Authority (IAA). A significant portion of revenue generated by James Richardson (and by extension, sales of Burberry goods) flows to the IAA as concession fees.
• Logistical Hub: Ben Gurion Airport is the primary point of entry/exit and is strictly controlled by Israeli security services. While standard for any nation, the specific context of Israel’s control over Palestinian movement (and the use of the airport as the sole international gateway for the region, largely inaccessible to West Bank Palestinians) adds a layer of exclusionary logistics to the venue.

5. The Ideological Supply Chain: Ownership and Licensing

A forensic audit of “Military Complicity” must also address the “Ideological Support” component of the user’s objective. In the case of Burberry, this vector is found not in the fashion division, but in the Beauty division.

5.1. The Licensing Structure: Coty Inc.

In 2017, Burberry transferred the global license for its Beauty business (fragrances, cosmetics, skincare) to Coty Inc. for $160 million (approx. £130m) plus ongoing royalties.²⁰

• Operational Control: While the bottle says “Burberry,” the liquid inside, the marketing strategy, the manufacturing, and the distribution are controlled by Coty.
• Revenue Flow: Burberry Group plc receives royalty payments based on sales volume. Conversely, profits generated by Burberry Beauty contribute to Coty’s bottom line.

5.2. The Ultimate Beneficiary: JAB Holding and the Reimann Family

Coty Inc. is controlled by JAB Holding Company, the investment vehicle of the German Reimann family. This ownership structure introduces a distinct ideological dimension to the audit.

Historical Context (The Nazi Past): In 2019, the Reimann family publicly acknowledged that their ancestors (Albert Reimann Sr. and Jr.) were enthusiastic supporters of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party, and that their company (Benckiser) used forced labor during World War II.²¹

The Pivot to “Reparative Zionism”:

In response to this revelation, the Reimann family engaged in a massive philanthropic pivot, explicitly directed toward supporting Jewish causes and the State of Israel.

• Alfred Landecker Foundation: The family established this foundation, endowed with €260 million, to “defend open and liberal societies” and fight antisemitism.²²
• Mission Statement: The foundation’s stated position on Israel is explicit: “The right of the State of Israel to exist is inviolable… Israeli society requires the solidarity of the world community”.²³
• Anti-BDS Stance: The foundation and the family view the delegitimization of Israel (often conflated with the BDS movement) as a form of antisemitism to be combating.

Assessment of Ideological Support:

This creates a complex but verified chain of ideological support:

1. Consumer buys Burberry Hero perfume.
2. Revenue flows to Coty Inc.
3. Profits flow to JAB Holding (Reimann Family).
4. Philanthropic capital flows to the Alfred Landecker Foundation.
5. The Foundation deploys resources to advocate for the Israeli state and combat movements (like BDS) that oppose the occupation.

While the foundation promotes a “liberal” and “democratic” Israel and advocates for minority rights ²³, its core mission is the preservation and defense of the Zionist state project as a reparative act for the Holocaust. This constitutes Ideological Sustainment under the user’s definition.

6. Retail Footprint and Settlement Penetration

Beyond the high-end boutiques of Factory 54, the audit must locate where Burberry goods physically sit on shelves. The presence of goods in settlements indicates a failure of “geofencing” in the distribution chain.

6.1. Third-Party Retailers in Settlements

Burberry fragrances are widely distributed through third-party pharmacy and beauty chains. The largest of these is Super-Pharm.

• Network: Super-Pharm operates over 280 branches across Israel.
• Settlement Locations: The chain has confirmed branches in major settlements, including Ariel, Maale Adumim, and Gush Etzion.²⁴
• Product Availability: Snippets confirm that Burberry perfumes are sold at Super-Pharm.²⁶
• Conclusion: It is forensically certain that Burberry products are available for purchase within illegal settlements via Super-Pharm shelves. This is an “indirect” presence, as Burberry likely sells to a master distributor who then sells to Super-Pharm, but it represents a physical penetration of the settlement economy.

6.2. Delta Israel Brands Locations

As noted in Section 3, Delta Israel Brands operates stores in Pisgat Zeev (East Jerusalem settlement neighborhood), Ramot (East Jerusalem), and Maale Adumim (West Bank).⁸

• Risk: If Delta Israel Brands utilizes these specific storefronts to sell the licensed Burberry Intimates line, then Burberry has a direct branded retail footprint in the settlements. Unlike Super-Pharm (which is a pharmacy selling many brands), a Delta store selling licensed apparel is a more direct representation of the brand partner.

6.3. Table of Identified Retail Vectors in Contested Zones

7. Financial and Institutional Analysis

7.1. Corporate Neutrality and CSR

Burberry Group plc maintains a corporate stance of geopolitical neutrality.

• Humanitarian Equivalence: In response to the October 7th escalation, the company supported British Red Cross appeals for “humanitarian aid to civilians affected by the crises,” explicitly mentioning both “Israel and Gaza”.²⁹ This bifurcation is a standard corporate strategy to mitigate reputational risk from both sides.
• Lack of Blacklisting: Unlike competitors such as Puma (targeted for IFA sponsorship) or HP (targeted for technology supply), Burberry does not appear on the primary “Boycott” lists of the BDS movement (e.g., the BDS National Committee or the IHRC list).³⁰ This suggests that activists have not identified the brand as a priority target, likely due to the indirect nature of its complicity (Supply Chain vs. Direct Contract).

7.2. Institutional Investment Overlap

An analysis of shareholder data reveals that Burberry’s institutional investors often hold simultaneous positions in Israeli defense or settlement companies.

• Common Ownership: Funds such as Dimensional Fund Advisors and the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund hold stakes in both Burberry Group plc and Delta Israel Brands.¹¹
• Analysis: While this does not indicate active collusion by Burberry, it demonstrates that the brand is financially bundled with settlement actors in the portfolios of global capital. There is no pressure from these major shareholders for Burberry to divest from Israel, as the shareholders themselves are invested in the Israeli economy.

8. Comparative Analysis and Risk Stratification

To assist the Defense Logistics Analyst in “ranking” Burberry, it is useful to compare its complicity profile against industry peers mentioned in the research material.

8.1. Peer Comparison

• vs. Puma: Puma was targeted for its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association (IFA), which includes teams from settlements.⁸ Burberry has no such sponsorship. Puma’s complicity is institutional/branding; Burberry’s is supply chain.
• vs. LVMH (Louis Vuitton): LVMH has made significant direct investments in Israeli companies. Burberry’s financial exposure is limited to sales revenue and supply chain payments, not equity investment in Israeli tech/defense firms.
• vs. Chanel/Hermès: Like Burberry, these brands likely rely on similar duty-free and franchise models. However, Burberry’s specific link to Delta Galil (a UN-listed entity) creates a higher specific risk profile than a brand that merely sells to a distributor.

8.2. Risk Stratification Data Table

9. Comprehensive Conclusions and Information Synthesis

Based on the forensic audit of the available intelligence, the following assessment is submitted for the Defense Logistics Analyst’s consideration.

9.1. Summary of Findings

Burberry Group plc is not a military contractor. There is no evidence to support the claim that the entity supplies uniforms, weaponry, or tactical sustainment to the IDF. The “IDF Uniform” connection is a digital artifact of e-commerce algorithms, and the “trench coat” legacy is historically relevant but operationally obsolete in a modern military context.

However, the entity displays Meaningful Complicity through its Supply Chain and Distribution architectures. By maintaining a manufacturing partnership with Delta Galil Industries, Burberry integrates its supply chain with a company formally listed by the United Nations for its settlement activities. This is a voluntary commercial choice that provides revenue to a settlement actor.

Furthermore, the entity’s distribution model in Israel, executed through Factory 54 (Irani Corp) and Delta Israel Brands, facilitates the “normalization” of the occupation. The operation of retail storefronts in Mamilla (East Jerusalem) and the logistical servicing of settlement populations via e-commerce and third-party pharmacies constitutes material support for the lifestyle and economic viability of the settlement enterprise.

9.2. Final Assessment for Ranking

In a ranking system of Military Complicity:

• Hardware/Defense Support: Burberry ranks Null/Negligible.
• Occupation Economy Support: Burberry ranks Moderate-High.

1. Idf Uniform for sale – eBay, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.ebay.com/b/Idf-Uniform/104023/bn_7023265381
2. Idf Clothing – Walmart, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.walmart.com/c/kp/idf-clothing
3. Burberry replaces chief executive as it issues fresh profit warning – The Guardian, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/jul/15/burberry-chief-executive-profit-warning-jonathan-akeroyd-joshua-schulman
4. Handemade Made In Israel Signed Ring Size 8, accessed February 3, 2026, https://guerrerophoto.com/products/3971082/
5. Vintage 70’s Women’s Black Leather Trench Coat/ Belted Made In Israel Size 10 | eBay, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.ebay.com/itm/316554468310
6. Burberry Blue Label Set Up, accessed February 3, 2026, https://gyanasthalibarh.in/products/4578672/
7. Annex 1: Company list, accessed February 3, 2026, https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024_DBIO-IV_Company-list.pdf
8. Fashion’s Hidden Ties to Illegal Occupation – COSH!, accessed February 3, 2026, https://cosh.eco/en/articles/how-fashion-supports-illegal-occupation-and-genocide
9. Company – Executive Management – Delta Galil, accessed February 3, 2026, https://deltagalil.com/company/executive-management/default.aspx
10. Turkish knitter honoured by Burberry – Knitting Industry, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.knittingindustry.com/turkish-knitter-honoured-by-burberry/
11. OPERF Public Equity Holdings – Oregon.gov, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.oregon.gov/treasury/invested-for-oregon/Documents/Invested-for-OR-Performance-and-Holdings/2023/OPERF-Public-Equity-Holdings-as-of-06-30-2023.pdf
12. Dimensional Global Core Equity Fund – Class GBP (Accumulation), accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.dimensional.com/-/media/monthly-holdings/holdings_ie_global-core-equity-fund-gbp-acc.pdf
13. STORES – Factory 54, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.factory54.co.il/stores
14. Factory 54 – Yarid Hamizrach – נמל תל אביב, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.namal.co.il/en/businesses/factory-54/
15. Puma Swaps One Complicit Israeli Distributor for Another, Maintains Support for Israel’s Violent Land Grabs | BDS Movement, accessed February 3, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/puma-swaps-one-complicit-israeli-distributor-for-another-maintains-support-for-israels-violent
16. Exposing the financial flows into illegal Israeli settlements, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/2022_11_29_dbio-report-def_2-1-1.pdf
17. Take Action: Lululemon Dressing up Apartheid! – Just Peace Advocates, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.justpeaceadvocates.ca/take-action-lululemon-dressing-up-apartheid/
18. בשמים מבית BURBERRY | דיוטי פרי ג’יימס ריצ’רדסון, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.dutyfree.co.il/all-brands/burberry.html
19. Duty Free Perfume royalty-free images – Shutterstock, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.shutterstock.com/search/duty-free-perfume?page=5
20. Burberry Beauty doubles down on cosmetics with new Selfridges beauty boutique, accessed February 3, 2026, https://cosmeticsbusiness.com/burberry-beauty-doubles-down-on-cosmetics-with-new
21. The Story of the Alfred Landecker Foundation, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/the-story-of-the-alfred-landecker-foundation
22. Who we are – Alfred Landecker Stiftung, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/who-we-are
23. Statement on Israel – Alfred Landecker Stiftung, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/in-eigener-sache-zu-israel
24. Everything in Ma’ale Adumim | easy, accessed February 3, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Everything?region=1225
25. Pharm Stores (Accessible Entrance) – Best in Jerusalem area | easy, accessed February 3, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Pharm-Stores?c2=21916®ion=25
26. BURBERRY – סופר-פארם, accessed February 3, 2026, https://shop.super-pharm.co.il/BURBERRY/c/b_2294
27. Marvel Travel: What to Bring from Israel ~ Fragrances and Cultures – Fragrantica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.fragrantica.com/news/Marvel-Travel-What-to-Bring-from-Israel-9942.html
28. Beauty gifts so good you’ll want to keep them for yourself | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/consumerism/article-867821
29. Communities – Burberryplc, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.burberryplc.com/impact/burberry-beyond/communities
30. New anti-Israeli boycott list issued – IHRC – Islamic Human Rights Commission, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.ihrc.org.uk/new-anti-israeli-boycott-list-issued/
31. Does Burberry support Israel? CSR and silent signals – Brussels Morning Newspaper, accessed February 3, 2026, https://brusselsmorning.com/does-burberry-support-israel-csr-and-silent-signals/76888/