1. Executive Intelligence Summary

This forensic assessment executes a comprehensive “Red Team” audit of Sir Ephraim Mirvis, the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth. The mandate is strictly defined: to identify, categorize, and operationalize legal liabilities, reputational risks, and systemic hypocrisies that serve as leverage points for opposition actors. The analysis disregards biographical pleasantries to focus exclusively on vectors of vulnerability that expose institutional complicity, ethical contradictions, and potential regulatory breaches.

The operational hypothesis driving this investigation is that the Office of the Chief Rabbi (OCR), under Mirvis’s tenure, has fundamentally shifted from a pastoral, quasi-diplomatic religious institution into a highly active, partisan political entity operating under the shield of charitable status. This transition has generated a “target-rich” environment for opposition research. The assessment reveals a pattern of conduct where the OCR functions as a sophisticated lobbying node for specific foreign policy interests—specifically the right-wing trajectory of the State of Israel—often at the expense of domestic social cohesion and compliance with the apolitical requirements of UK charity law.

Primary Vulnerability Vectors:

  1. The “Foreign Influence” & Charity Law Liability: Mirvis’s direct interventions in UK general elections (2019) and foreign policy decisions (2024 arms exports, 2025 Palestinian recognition) constitute a breach of the traditional non-partisan containment of his office. This creates a specific vulnerability regarding the OCR’s charitable status and opens avenues for complaints regarding unregistered lobbying activities.
  2. Systemic Safeguarding & Governance Failures: The recent Employment Tribunal (2025) involving Dr. Moshe Freedman acts as a “smoking gun” for deep-seated failures in rabbinical vetting. The fact that a senior rabbi under Mirvis’s spiritual jurisdiction was producing violent, disturbing content while suspended for sexual misconduct allegations reveals a catastrophic lapse in oversight.
  3. The Hypocrisy Index (The “Say-Do” Gap): A forensic comparison of Mirvis’s public rhetoric on “tolerance” and “free speech” against his operational history reveals a chasm of hypocrisy. He advocates for free speech while supporting state censorship of boycott activists; he preaches interfaith inclusion while marginalizing representative Muslim leadership; he touts women’s rights while enforcing discriminatory theological barriers.
  4. Toxic Association & The “Far-Right” Pivot: Mirvis is structurally tethered to the Religious Zionist movement (Mizrachi UK), which has served as the incubator for the very extremism he now belatedly condemns. His attempt to distance himself from figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich is structurally undermined by years of legitimizing the ideology that empowered them.

This report serves as the foundational dossier for any strategic campaign aiming to neutralize Mirvis’s moral authority or challenge the institutional integrity of the Chief Rabbinate.

2. Section I: The Legal & Regulatory Dragnet

Liabilities, Investigations, and Institutional Failures

This section conducts a deep-dive audit into the legal and ethical record of the Office of the Chief Rabbi and its corporate vehicle, the United Synagogue (US). We examine specific case law, employment tribunals, and regulatory frameworks to construct a narrative of institutional negligence and overreach.

2.1 The Safeguarding Crisis: The Dr. Moshe Freedman Case

1

Vulnerability Classification: HIGH (proven governance failure)

Status: Post-Tribunal (August 2025), Reputationally Active.

The case of Dr. Moshe Freedman represents the most significant recent failure of the rabbinical establishment’s vetting and disciplinary procedures. While the United Synagogue successfully defended the legal claim for unfair dismissal, the facts established during the tribunal provide devastating leverage against Mirvis’s claim to moral and administrative competence.

The Forensic Detail:

In August 2025, an Employment Tribunal confirmed the dismissal of Dr. Freedman, a senior figure who had led the prestigious New West End Synagogue for nearly a decade.1 The dismissal was grounded in “gross misconduct,” a term that sanitizes the disturbing reality of the findings. The Tribunal established two distinct failure points that implicate the oversight of the Chief Rabbinate:

  1. The Sexual Misconduct Component: In May 2022, Freedman was arrested following an allegation of sexual misconduct.1 Crucially, while the complainant withdrew from the criminal process, a Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO)—the statutory official responsible for managing allegations against people who work with children—concluded that the allegations were “substantiated”.1 This finding suggests that, on the balance of probability and available evidence, the conduct occurred. The vulnerability here lies in the “quiet” nature of the suspension; for a year, the community was largely kept in the dark about the nature of the allegations, reflecting a culture of reputation management over transparency.
  2. The “Nursery Crimes” Videos: Perhaps most damaging to the reputation of the Rabbinate is the revelation that, during his suspension, Freedman created and uploaded violent cartoon videos to YouTube dubbed “nursery crimes”.1 These videos depicted graphic violence, including stabbings and bleeding, overlaid on children’s nursery rhymes.
    • The Oversight Failure: That a senior rabbi, ordained and overseen by the Chief Rabbi, could descend into behavior described by Mirvis himself as “dangerous” and “wholly inappropriate” 1 raises fundamental questions about the psychological vetting of community leaders. Opposition actors can legitimately ask: What mechanisms does the Chief Rabbi have to monitor the stability of his clergy? Why was this behavior only caught when it became public?
  3. The Financial Cost: The Tribunal ordered Freedman to pay £20,000 in costs.1 While a victory for the US, it highlights the immense financial drain caused by rabbinical misconduct—funds derived from charitable donations and membership fees that were diverted to legal defense rather than community services.

2.2 The “Foreign Influence” Dossier: Charity Law vs. Political Lobbying

Vulnerability Classification: HIGH (Regulatory Risk)

Status: Active/Ongoing.

The Office of the Chief Rabbi operates as a registered charity (The Chief Rabbinate Trust, Charity No. 242552).2 Under UK law, charities must exist for the public benefit and cannot have a political purpose. While charities can engage in political activity to further their charitable aims, they must remain non-partisan. Mirvis has repeatedly tested, and arguably breached, this boundary.

The 2019 General Election Intervention 4:

In November 2019, Mirvis authored a seminal op-ed in The Times titled “What will become of Jews and Judaism in Britain if the Labour Party forms the next government?” In this piece, he claimed a “new poison – sanctioned from the top – has taken root in the Labour Party” and effectively instructed the public not to vote for the opposition.

  • The Liability: This intervention was unprecedented. Unlike his predecessor Lord Sacks, who generally avoided direct electoral instruction, Mirvis mobilized the spiritual authority of his office to influence the outcome of a General Election. This creates a leverage point for a formal complaint to the Charity Commission regarding the politicization of a religious charity. It frames the OCR not as a religious body, but as a partisan political action committee (PAC) operating with tax-exempt status.

The 2024-2025 Foreign Policy Interventions 7:

Mirvis has increasingly utilized his platform to lobby for the specific foreign policy interests of the State of Israel, often in direct opposition to UK government policy and humanitarian consensus.

  • The Arms Export Lobby: On September 3, 2024, following the UK government’s decision to suspend 30 arms export licenses to Israel due to legal advice regarding International Humanitarian Law (IHL), Mirvis issued a statement claiming the decision “beggars belief”.7
    • Forensic Insight: By attacking a decision based on legal advice regarding war crimes, Mirvis positioned his office against the UK rule of law. He prioritized the military supply chain of a foreign state over the UK’s compliance with international treaty obligations. This is the definition of “foreign influence lobbying.”
  • The Palestinian State Recognition: In July 2025, when the UK government signaled readiness to recognize a Palestinian state, Mirvis termed it an “unfathomable misstep” and a “betrayal”.8
    • Forensic Insight: This intervention moved beyond religious concerns into pure diplomatic strategy. By lobbying against UK foreign policy objectives, he exposes the OCR to accusations of acting as an unregistered agent of influence.

2.3 Institutional Discrimination: The JFS Legacy

Vulnerability Classification: MEDIUM (Systemic/Reputational)

Status: Settled Law/Ongoing Practice.

The Supreme Court judgment in R (E) v Governing Body of JFS 9 remains a potent legal stain on the institutions Mirvis leads. The Court ruled that the admissions policy of the Jewish Free School (JFS)—which operates under the authority of the Chief Rabbi—constituted direct racial discrimination.

The Leverage:

  • The “Race” Ruling: The Court found that by excluding a child because his mother was not Jewish by Orthodox standards (specifically by matrilineal descent), the school was discriminating on ethnic/racial grounds.9 Mirvis continues to enforce this definition of Jewish status for all United Synagogue schools.
  • The “Gatekeeper” Liability: In an era of heightened sensitivity to inclusion and diversity, Mirvis acts as the “Gatekeeper of Identity,” enforcing a policy that the highest court in the land deemed racially discriminatory. This creates a permanent wedge issue with progressive Jewish movements (Reform, Liberal) and secular authorities. It allows opposition researchers to frame his organization as fundamentally exclusionary and legally adjudged as discriminatory.

2.4 Financial Opacity: The “Funding Fathers” & The Chief Rabbinate Trust

Vulnerability Classification: MEDIUM (Transparency Risk)

Status: Structural.

The financial engine of Mirvis’s office, the Chief Rabbinate Trust, relies heavily on a small cadre of high-net-worth donors, historically referred to as the “Funding Fathers”.10

The Financial Structure 2:

  • Asset Base: The Trust holds significant cash equivalents (£846,078 as of 2022) but operates with a relatively small turnover, making individual large donations disproportionately influential.
  • Donor Dependency: Historical precedents show that these donors expect returns on their investment. Sir Stanley Kalms, a major donor, famously called for Lord Sacks’s resignation when he felt the Rabbi was too “diffident”.10
  • The Leverage: The opacity of the current donor list (often funnelled through foundations or family trusts) raises questions about policy capture.
    • Strategic Question: To what extent are Mirvis’s hawkish political interventions driven by the demands of these donors rather than theological necessity? The correlation between the political leanings of the United Synagogue’s wealthy lay leadership (e.g., the Goldstein family) and Mirvis’s public statements suggests a “pay-to-play” dynamic where the Chief Rabbi acts as the mouthpiece for a specific socio-economic stratum of British Jewry.

3. Section II: The Hypocrisy Index (The ‘Say-Do’ Gap)

Forensic Analysis of Contradictions

This section catalogs specific instances where Sir Ephraim Mirvis’s public values are contradicted by his operational conduct. These contradictions are formatted for immediate deployment in media narratives to erode his credibility.

3.1 The “Free Speech” Paradox

The Stated Value:

Mirvis frequently positions himself as a defender of intellectual liberty. He has praised authors who challenge “cancel culture,” endorsing the right to speak and think “without being bullied, sacked or arrested for heresy against the modish orthodoxy”.12 He frames his opposition to antisemitism on campus as a defense of Jewish students’ rights to free expression.

The Contradictory Action:

  • The Anti-BDS Bill Support 13: Mirvis actively supported the “Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill.” This legislation was designed to legally prohibit local councils and public bodies from engaging in boycott campaigns (BDS) against foreign countries (specifically Israel).
  • The Hypocrisy: While railing against “cancel culture” in the abstract, Mirvis supported a piece of legislation that effectively cancels the political speech of democratically elected local councils. He advocates for the state to strip public bodies of their right to express moral disapproval through economic action.
  • The Leverage: Mirvis is a “Free Speech Absolutist” only when the speech supports his ideological allies. When the speech involves criticism of Israel (BDS), he becomes a proponent of state-enforced censorship and legislative gagging orders.

3.2 The “Tolerance” Charade: Global PR vs. Local Exclusion

The Stated Value:

Mirvis markets his tenure on “interfaith dialogue” and “inclusivity.” He touts his historic visits to the UAE and the “Abraham Accords” as evidence of his commitment to building bridges with the Muslim world.15 He speaks of “compassion, understanding, love and peaceful coexistence”.16

The Contradictory Action:

  • The “Drumlanrig Accords” Rejection 17: In the UK, Mirvis’s interfaith efforts have been exposed as exclusionary. His signing of the “Muslim-Jewish Reconciliation Accords” was publicly rejected by grassroots Muslim organizations. They accused him of bypassing representative leadership in favor of “self-appointed” figures (like Dr. Sayed Razawi) who would not challenge his Zionist positions.
  • The Hypocrisy: Mirvis engages in “Potemkin Diplomacy”—creating the appearance of dialogue with “safe” Muslim leaders abroad (UAE) or compliant figures at home, while actively marginalizing the mainstream Muslim community in the UK, particularly those critical of Israeli policy in Gaza. His “tolerance” is conditional on political acquiescence.

3.3 The “Human Rights” Mirage: Selective Compassion

The Stated Value:

Mirvis frequently invokes “human rights,” “dignity,” and the “sanctity of life.” He criticized the Labour Party for a “failure of culture” regarding racism.5

The Contradictory Action:

  • The Gaza Arms Export Defense 7: When the UK government suspended arms licenses due to the risk of violations of International Humanitarian Law (i.e., war crimes against Palestinian civilians), Mirvis did not express concern for the potential victims. Instead, he attacked the decision as “beggars belief,” effectively lobbying for the uninterrupted flow of weapons into a conflict zone marked by catastrophic civilian casualties.
  • The Hypocrisy: His invocation of “human rights” stops at the Gaza border. By framing the suspension of arms as a “falsehood” regarding IHL breaches, he engages in denialism regarding the humanitarian reality documented by the UN and international courts. This exposes a hierarchy of human value in his worldview: the security of the Israeli state supersedes the human rights of Palestinian civilians.

3.4 The “Women’s Rights” Gap

The Stated Value:

Mirvis claims credit for “expanding women’s roles” within Orthodoxy, citing the Ma’ayan Programme and the appointment of female advisors.18

The Contradictory Action:

  • The Structural Glass Ceiling: Despite these cosmetic changes, Mirvis strictly maintains the prohibition on female rabbis.
  • The JFS Enforcement: He continues to enforce the matrilineal descent rule that disproportionately penalizes women and their children, a policy the Supreme Court labeled discriminatory.9
  • The Hypocrisy: He offers “roles” but denies “power.” The expansion of women’s roles is a containment strategy designed to stave off the demand for true egalitarianism (i.e., ordination), ensuring the ultimate spiritual authority remains exclusively male.

4. Section III: Toxic Associations

Network Analysis of Extremist Ties

A critical component of this assessment is the “Guilt by Association” matrix. Despite his refined public image, Sir Ephraim Mirvis is structurally and ideologically tethered to figures and movements that are politically toxic.

4.1 The Far-Right Israeli Government Nexus (Smotrich & Ben-Gvir)

The Connection:

Mirvis has long been associated with Mizrachi UK, the religious Zionist organization that acts as a bridge between British Orthodoxy and the Israeli settler movement.

  • The Evidence: In May 2023, Mirvis attended a “Day of Inspiration” organized by Mizrachi UK. The event featured speakers and themes aligned with the “Greater Israel” ideology. Mizrachi UK has previously hosted Bezalel Smotrich (founder of Regavim).19
  • The “Stains” Pivot: In July 2025, reports surfaced that Mirvis referred to Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich as “stains on the Zionist project” in private meetings.8
  • The Toxicity: This condemnation was reactive, private, and late. For years, Mirvis legitimized the Religious Zionist institutions that birthed these figures. By attending events where “Sovereignty over the Land of Israel” (a code for annexation) was discussed, he provided the theological cover for the rise of the very extremism he now seeks to disavow. The opposition narrative is clear: Mirvis is a “fair-weather moderate” who tolerated Jewish extremism until it became a PR liability for his office.

4.2 The “Self-Appointed” Interfaith Partners

The Connection:

Mirvis’s primary Muslim interlocutors in the UK, such as Dr. Sayed Razawi, have been denounced by broader Muslim civil society groups.17

  • The Toxicity: By aligning with figures who lack grassroots legitimacy, Mirvis insulates himself from genuine critique. This association reinforces the narrative that he is uninterested in real dialogue (which requires difficult conversations) and prefers “faith-washing”—using tokenistic interfaith photo-ops to shield himself from accusations of Islamophobia.

4.3 The Corporate & Donor Nexus: The Goldstein Family

The Connection:

The Presidency of the United Synagogue is held by Michael Goldstein.3 The Goldstein family represents a powerful nexus of finance and property development within the community.

  • The Toxicity: The “Thuggery” email incident 21, where Michael Goldstein communicated his “disgust” at civil unrest to the US workforce, demonstrates the seamless integration of corporate management styles into religious governance.
  • The “Capture” Risk: The reliance of the OCR on a small circle of wealthy donors creates a structural vulnerability. The priorities of the Chief Rabbinate—fighting BDS, defending Israel, maintaining conservative social values—mirror perfectly the interests of this donor class. This raises the question: Is the Chief Rabbi a spiritual leader, or the Chief Lobbyist for a wealthy property-owning faction?

4.4 The “Regavim” Connection

The Connection:

Regavim is a pro-settler NGO co-founded by Bezalel Smotrich that advocates for the demolition of Palestinian structures.

  • The Evidence: Through his association with Mizrachi UK, Mirvis is one degree of separation from Regavim. Mizrachi UK has hosted Regavim speakers.19
  • The Toxicity: Regavim is widely considered an extremist organization by human rights groups. Mirvis’s failure to explicitly and publicly ban such organizations from United Synagogue premises before 2025 demonstrates a tolerance for the “settler fringe” that contradicts his “peaceful coexistence” rhetoric.

5. Section IV: The ‘Receipts’ List

The Top 5 Most Damaging Findings (Chronological)

The following list compiles the most strategically valuable “receipts”—verified instances of conduct that can be weaponized to discredit Sir Ephraim Mirvis.

Date Event The ‘Receipt’ (Finding) The Leverage (Implication)
Nov 25, 2019 Election Intervention Authored “New Poison” Op-Ed in The Times.4 Charitable Breach: Direct interference in a General Election. Can be used to challenge tax-exempt status and frame the OCR as a partisan PAC.
May 2023 Legitimizing Extremism Attended Mizrachi UK “Day of Inspiration” featuring annexationist themes.19 Guilt by Association: Proof of connection to the ideology of Smotrich/Ben-Gvir, contradicting his later “stains” comment.
Sept 3, 2024 Arms Export Defense Posted on X that UK arms suspension “beggars belief”.7 Foreign Agent: Prioritized Israeli military supply over UK rule of law/IHL compliance. Erodes “human rights” credibility.
July 31, 2025 Diplomatic Sabotage Termed UK recognition of Palestine an “unfathomable misstep”.8 Lobbying: Attempted to veto UK foreign policy. Demonstrates the office functions as a diplomatic outpost for a foreign state.
Aug 11, 2025 The Freedman Judgment Employment Tribunal confirms dismissal of Rabbi Freedman for sexual misconduct & violent videos.1 Safeguarding Failure: Smoking gun for negligence in vetting. A senior rabbi was making “nursery crimes” videos while under his spiritual watch.

6. Strategic Analysis & Conclusions

6.1 The Core Narrative: “The Political Operative”

The most effective opposition strategy is to systematically strip Sir Ephraim Mirvis of his religious immunity. He should not be engaged as a theologian, but as a political operative. His interventions in the 2019 election and the 2024 arms export debate define him as a partisan actor.

  • Recommendation: Every critique should begin with the premise that the Office of the Chief Rabbi is a political lobby. Use the term “Lobbyist Mirvis” rather than “Rabbi Mirvis” in framing to shift the window of discourse.

6.2 The “Safeguarding” Wedge

The Freedman case 1 is a dormant crisis. While the US handled the dismissal legally, the details are visceral.

  • Recommendation: Utilize the “nursery crimes” detail to question the entire vetting apparatus of the Rabbinate. If the Chief Rabbi cannot detect that one of his senior ministers is producing violent content, how can he be trusted with the safeguarding of the community’s children?

6.3 Exploiting the “Fair-Weather Moderate”

Mirvis’s 2025 condemnation of Ben-Gvir and Smotrich as “stains” 8 is a strategic vulnerability, not a strength. It allows for the accusation of opportunism.

  • Recommendation: Frame him as a “Fair-Weather Moderate.” He did not condemn the ideology of Religious Zionism when it was growing in his own backyard (Mizrachi UK); he only condemned the individuals when they became globally toxic. This portrays him as a leader who follows polls, not principles.

6.4 The “Hypocrisy” Pincer

Mirvis is vulnerable on the specific contradiction between his “Free Speech” rhetoric and his support for the Anti-BDS bill.

  • Recommendation: In any public forum or debate, this binary should be presented: “Sir Ephraim, you support the right to offend ‘modish orthodoxy’ on campus, but you support state laws to ban councils from boycotting. Do you support free speech, or only speech you agree with?”

Final Assessment:

Sir Ephraim Mirvis has constructed a tenure based on the projection of dignified, apolitical moral leadership. The forensic evidence—from the Freedman tribunal to the political lobbying on arms sales—shatters this projection. He is a deeply political figure, tethered to toxic associations he cannot fully shake, and presiding over an institution with significant governance and safeguarding vulnerabilities.

Works cited

  1. Former New West End rabbi loses employment tribunal claim …, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/former-new-west-end-rabbi-loses-employment-tribunal-claim-against-united-synagogue/
  2. CHIEF RABBINATE TRUST (Company limited by guarantee) Trustees’ Report and Financial Statements For The Year Ended 31st December – Charity Commission, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search?p_p_id=uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&p_p_resource_id=%2Faccounts-resource&p_p_cacheability=cacheLevelPage&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_objectiveId=A14673878&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_mvcRenderCommandName=%2Ffull-print&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_organisationNumber=3997127
  3. Report and Annual Accounts | United Synagogue, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://theus.org.uk/assets/uploads/2024/06/United-Synagogue-Annual-Report-and-Accounts.pdf
  4. ‘A new poison’: Why the UK chief rabbi broke the mold to confront Jeremy Corbyn, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/a-new-poison-why-the-uk-chief-rabbi-broke-the-mold-to-confront-jeremy-corbyn/
  5. UK chief rabbi: What will be the fate of Jews if Labour ‘poison’ comes to power?, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-chief-rabbi-what-will-be-the-fate-of-jews-if-labour-poison-comes-to-power/
  6. Jeremy Corbyn ‘not fit for high office’ over Labour anti-semitism ‘poison’, says Chief Rabbi, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/jeremy-corbyn-not-fit-for-high-office-over-labour-antisemitism-poison-says-chief-rabbi
  7. Religion news 4 September 2024, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/news/religion-news-4-september-2024/
  8. Religion news 31 July 2025, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/news/religion-news-31-july-2025/
  9. JUDGMENT – The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2009_0105_judgment_183b42971c.pdf
  10. British chief rabbi asked to quit – Jewish Telegraphic Agency, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.jta.org/2003/12/23/lifestyle/british-chief-rabbi-asked-to-quit
  11. CHIEF RABBINATE TRUST (Company limited by guarantee) Trustees’ Report and Annual Accounts Annual report and Financial Statements – Charity Commission, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search?p_p_id=uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&p_p_resource_id=%2Faccounts-resource&p_p_cacheability=cacheLevelPage&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_objectiveId=A12302985&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_mvcRenderCommandName=%2Faccounts-and-annual-returns&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_organisationNumber=3997127
  12. accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.newstatesman.com/magazine-csv-feeds
  13. 1371 – 14th June 2024 by Jewish News – Issuu, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://issuu.com/jewishnewsuk/docs/jn_1371
  14. Muslim Brotherhood? Antisemites? Meet the Guardian’s ‘civil society’. < CAMERA UK, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://camera-uk.org/2023/05/28/muslim-brotherhood-antisemites-meet-the-guardians-civil-society/
  15. U.K. Chief Rabbi Mirvis reflects on his historic trip to the UAE – Jewish Insider, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://image.jewishinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/18001846/november-18-2022.pdf
  16. 1320 – 22nd June 2023 by Jewish News – Issuu, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://issuu.com/jewishnewsuk/docs/1320
  17. UK Muslim and community groups reject accords between ‘self-appointed leaders’ and chief rabbi – Middle East Monitor, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250304-uk-muslim-and-community-groups-reject-accords-between-self-appointed-leaders-and-chief-rabbi/
  18. Ephraim Mirvis – Wikipedia, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephraim_Mirvis
  19. Why are British Jews opening their doors to far-right settler groups? – +972 Magazine, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/british-jews-regavim/
  20. The rabbi who bridges two communities – Jenni Frazer, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://jennifrazer.com/the-rabbi-who-bridges-two-communities/
  21. United Synagogue president reassures ‘diverse’ workforce – Jewish News, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/thuggery-on-our-streets-is-despicable-united-synagogue-president-seeks-to-reassure-staff/