Next

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Next plc

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom (Headquarters: Enderby, Leicestershire)

Sector: Consumer Discretionary / Retail & Logistics / Platform Services

Leadership: Lord Simon Wolfson (CEO), Michael Roney (Chairman)

Intelligence Conclusions:

This forensic corporate intelligence assessment establishes that Next plc, while ostensibly operating as a benign high-street fashion retailer and logistics platform, functions as a high-value civilian enabler within the support architecture of the State of Israel, its military apparatus, and the illegal settlement enterprise. The investigation synthesizes evidence from military, digital, economic, and political audits to reveal a profile of Tier 2 Strategic Complicity. This classification denotes an entity that, while not a prime defense contractor, provides critical material, financial, and infrastructural support that sustains the operational capacity and legitimacy of the occupation.

The complicity profile of Next plc is not incidental; it is structural and dynastic. It is defined by the convergence of executive ideology, supply chain dependency, and technological alignment.

Primary Intelligence Findings:

• Ideological Financing of the Military Apparatus (The Wolfson-AWIS Nexus): The most significant and direct vector of complicity is the financial pipeline established by the corporate leadership. Lord Simon Wolfson, the longest-serving CEO in the FTSE 100, utilizes the wealth derived from Next plc to capitalize the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust. This Trust is a sustained financier of the UK Friends of the Association for the Wellbeing of Israel Soldiers (AWIS) and Beit Halochem. Unlike general humanitarian aid, these organizations are legally mandated to provide “Morale, Welfare, and Recreation” (MWR) support to active-duty and reserve personnel of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). By funding rehabilitation centers, gyms, and rest facilities, the Next executive leadership effectively subsidizes the human capital costs of the Israeli military, freeing up state resources for lethal procurement.¹
• Structural Economic Integration & “Origin Washing”: Next plc serves as a strategic stabilizer for Delta Galil Industries, an Israeli industrial giant listed on the UN OHCHR database of companies complicit in settlement activity. Through complex Joint Ventures (Victoria’s Secret UK) and global licensing agreements (Ted Baker), Next stabilizes Delta Galil’s revenue streams, allowing the firm to maintain its “Headquarters Economy” in Tel Aviv while offshoring physical production. This partnership facilitates the global distribution of settlement-linked capital, effectively “laundering” the reputational risk associated with the occupation through the benign storefront of a British retailer.⁵
• Technological Sovereignty & The “Unit 8200” Stack: Under its “Total Platform” strategy, Next plc has evolved into a “Digital Landlord.” It has architected a digital infrastructure that is systemically dependent on the Israeli military-intelligence ecosystem, specifically the “Unit 8200 Stack” comprising Check Point, Wiz, SentinelOne, and CyberArk. Crucially, Next forces this stack upon its third-party clients (Gap UK, Reiss, Joules), acting as a wholesaler of Israeli cybersecurity and denying these brands digital sovereignty. Furthermore, the company is a founding financier of Project Pegasus, a domestic surveillance initiative that funds facial recognition technology, aligning its corporate security posture with the “securitization” doctrines perfected by the Israeli security sector.⁸
• Normalization of Annexation: The company’s subsidiary, Reiss, operates a flagship retail storefront in the Mamilla Mall, located in the sensitive seam zone of Jerusalem. By integrating this location into its global retail network, Next plc actively participates in the erasure of the Green Line and the economic normalization of annexed East Jerusalem. Additionally, its logistics partnership with GCX facilitates the seamless delivery of goods to illegal West Bank settlements, treating them as sovereign Israeli territory.⁵

Geopolitical Positioning:

The audit identifies a stark “Double Standard” in the company’s geopolitical ethics. Following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Next plc engaged in immediate divestment, shuttering its Russian website and issuing vocal condemnations. In contrast, regarding the Gaza conflict—despite higher civilian casualty metrics—the company has maintained operational continuity and silence. This asymmetry indicates that the company’s “neutrality” is ideologically conditional and selectively applied to align with Western-Israeli state interests.¹²

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

The trajectory of Next plc is a case study in the transformation of a legacy British tailoring business into a modern vehicle for dynastic wealth and influence. The company traces its origins to J. Hepworth & Son, founded in Leeds in 1864 by Joseph Hepworth. However, the modern iteration of the company—and its specific geopolitical alignment—was forged in the early 1980s under the stewardship of the Wolfson family.¹⁵

Sir David Wolfson (Baron Wolfson of Sunningdale), the nephew of the legendary Sir Isaac Wolfson (founder of the Great Universal Stores empire), was instrumental in rebranding the company as “Next” in 1982. The Wolfson dynasty is not merely a commercial success story; it is a pillar of British-Jewish philanthropy with a long, documented history of support for the Zionist project. Sir Isaac Wolfson established the Wolfson Foundation in 1955, which, while broadly philanthropic, set a precedent for using commercial wealth to support specific communal and state-building projects.¹⁶

The transition from the Hepworth era to the Wolfson era marked a shift in corporate culture. The company moved from a decentralized manufacturing model to a centralized, design-led retail giant. This centralization created the massive capital accumulation that would later fuel the family’s charitable trusts. The ideological roots of the leadership were never severed; rather, as the company grew to become a constituent of the FTSE 100, the scale of the “ideological dividend”—the portion of profits diverted to Zionist causes—grew commensurately.

Leadership & Ownership

The governance structure of Next plc is characterized by an unusual degree of dynastic continuity and centralized control, creating a scenario where corporate strategy and personal ideology are often indistinguishable.

• Lord Simon Wolfson (CEO since 2001):
  • The Architect: Simon Wolfson, Baron Wolfson of Aspley Guise, is the son of David Wolfson. He joined the company in 1991 and became CEO in 2001, making him the longest-serving chief executive in the FTSE 100.
  • The Ideologue: Unlike a technocratic manager, Lord Wolfson is a political operator. He is a Conservative Life Peer and a prominent donor to the Conservative Party.¹⁷ His influence extends beyond retail; he has chaired policy reviews for the government and funds right-wing think tanks like Policy Exchange and Civitas.
  • The Complicity Link: Most critically, he serves as a Trustee of the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust (WFCT). This role is not honorary; he is a decision-maker in the allocation of grants. The audit confirms that under his trusteeship, the WFCT has directed significant funding to Beit Halochem, the organization responsible for rehabilitating IDF soldiers. This establishes a direct link between the operational success of Next plc and the welfare of the Israeli military.¹
• Michael Roney (Chairman):
  • The Normalizer: Appointed in 2017, Michael Roney brings a specific geopolitical worldview to the board. As the former CEO of Bunzl plc (2005–2016), Roney oversaw a strategy of aggressive acquisition in Israel, purchasing industrial distributors like Silco and Meichaley Zahav.¹²
  • Strategic Impact: Roney’s background suggests a governance culture that views Israel strictly as a Western-style market (“Start-Up Nation”) rather than a conflict zone involving military occupation. This experience likely reinforces Next’s current strategy of “Commercial Normalization,” where trade with Israel is treated as “short-haul” European business, ignoring the unique ethical and legal risks associated with the occupation.

Analytical Assessment

The structural evolution of Next plc from a high-street retailer to a “Platform as a Service” (PaaS) provider has significantly deepened its complicity potential. By centralizing the logistics, digital, and financial operations of multiple brands (Gap, Victoria’s Secret, Reiss, Joules) onto a single infrastructure (“Total Platform”), Next has become a strategic aggregator.

This aggregation means that a decision made by Next—such as utilizing Check Point firewalls or partnering with Delta Galil for manufacturing—is automatically propagated across its client base. Next effectively “exports” its complicity to other brands. If Next decides to secure its network with Israeli military-grade tech, Gap UK (hosted on Next’s platform) is forced to utilize that same tech.

Furthermore, the leadership’s recurring engagement with Zionist venture capital and philanthropy indicates a sustained ideological alignment. The Wolfson family does not merely invest in Israel for returns; they invest in the survival and welfare of its state apparatus. The consistency of this support, spanning generations from Isaac to David to Simon, suggests that support for the Zionist project is a core tenet of the family’s ethos, which inevitably permeates the corporate culture they control.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

The following timeline isolates key milestones that demonstrate the convergence of Next plc’s corporate expansion with its deepening entanglement in the Israeli economy and security state.

Date	Event	Significance
1982	Launch of the “Next” brand.	Transformation of J. Hepworth into a modern fashion giant under the guidance of the Wolfson family, laying the foundation for the dynasty’s wealth generation.20
2001	Simon Wolfson appointed CEO.	Consolidation of control by the Wolfson family; beginning of the modern era of strategic centralization and efficiency.19
2010	Next statement on settlement sourcing.	The company admits to auditing its supply chain and removing a “small number” of settlement-linked businesses. This statement acknowledges the risk but fails to address downstream sales or “Headquarters Economy” ties.12
2017	Michael Roney appointed Chairman.	Brings experience from Bunzl plc in acquiring and integrating Israeli industrial distributors, reinforcing a strategy of commercial normalization.19
2018	WFCT Funding of Beit Halochem begins.	Charity Commission records indicate the start of sustained funding from the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust to the UK Friends of the Association for the Wellbeing of Israel Soldiers.4
Feb 2020	Delta Galil listed on UN OHCHR Database.	The UN names Next’s key supplier as a company involved in settlement activity. Next plc continues its strategic partnership despite this official designation.7
Sept 2020	Joint Venture with Victoria’s Secret UK.	Next intervenes to save the failing VS UK business. Given VS is a major client of Delta Galil, this move preserves a critical revenue channel for the Israeli manufacturer.21
2020	Launch of Total Platform.	Next pivots to becoming a “Digital Landlord,” hosting third-party brands and enforcing its Israeli-heavy tech stack upon them.20
Mar 2021	Acquisition of 51% stake in Reiss.	Next acquires a brand with operations in Mamilla Mall (Jerusalem), directly integrating a settlement-adjacent location into its global portfolio.22
Sept 2021	Joint Venture with Gap UK.	Next takes over Gap’s UK operations, stabilizing a brand with a deep history of franchising in Israel and normalizing its market presence.23
Feb 2022	Ukraine Response.	Next immediately divests from Russia and shuts down next.ru, establishing a precedent for geopolitical moral action that contrasts with its stance on Palestine.14
Oct 2023	Gaza Conflict Silence.	Unlike the Ukraine response, Next maintains full operations in Israel (next.co.il) and issues no humanitarian statements regarding the bombardment of Gaza.12
Oct 2023	Project Pegasus Launch.	Next joins a £600k funding initiative for police facial recognition, aligning its corporate security posture with surveillance-state tactics often piloted in Israel.24
2024	Beit Halochem Emergency Appeal.	Following Oct 7, the charity funded by Next’s CEO launches a campaign specifically for soldiers injured in the Gaza offensive, deepening the complicity of the funding stream.3
2025	Total Platform Expansion.	Next accelerates the migration of Joules and other brands onto its platform, expanding the reach of its Israeli-secured infrastructure and solidifying the “Vendor Mesh”.25

4. Domains of Complicity

The following analysis dissects Next plc’s complicity through four distinct forensic lenses: Military, Digital, Economic, and Political. Each domain reveals a different facet of the company’s integration with the Israeli state apparatus, demonstrating how commercial operations can function as vectors for geopolitical support.

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (V-MIL)

Goal: To determine if Next plc provides material support to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) or utilizes military-grade technology that directly subsidizes the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Wolfson-AWIS Capital Pipeline (Ideological Material Support):

The most direct and strategically significant link between Next plc and the Israeli military is the flow of capital from its CEO to the Association for the Wellbeing of Israel Soldiers (AWIS) via the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust (WFCT). This is not a passive investment; it is active, ideological patronage.

• The Mechanism of Transfer: Lord Simon Wolfson is a Trustee of the WFCT.¹⁸ The Trust derives its corpus from the family’s accumulated wealth, which is fundamentally sustained by the dividends, salary, and share value generated by Next plc. The corporation is the engine; the Trust is the vehicle.
• The Beneficiary – AWIS & Beit Halochem: Financial records confirm that the WFCT has donated over £600,000 to Zionist causes since 2018, including specific grants to Beit Halochem (the UK arm of the Zahal Disabled Veterans Organization).⁴ Beit Halochem is not a general humanitarian charity; it is the only organization legally mandated by the Israeli state to support wounded IDF veterans. Its mission is explicitly tied to the military.
• The Logistical Reality – “Fungibility of Aid”: In military doctrine, “Morale, Welfare, and Recreation” (MWR) is a critical function of sustainment. By funding rehabilitation centers, gyms, and rest facilities for soldiers, private donors like the Wolfson Trust effectively subsidize the IMOD budget. Money is fungible; every shekel provided by AWIS for a soldier’s rehabilitation is a shekel the IMOD does not have to spend on personnel costs, allowing those state funds to be reallocated to lethal procurement (munitions, fuel, platforms).
• Active Support for Operation Swords of Iron: The 2024 fundraising literature for Beit Halochem specifically highlights the need to support veterans injured during the “ensuing military operations” following October 7th.³ This confirms that the funds are directly supporting the cohort of soldiers actively engaged in the bombardment and invasion of Gaza. The support is contemporaneous with the conflict.
• Command Intent: The involvement of Lord Wolfson’s brother, the Hon. Andrew Wolfson, as the Chairman of Beit Halochem UK ¹⁸, further cements the family’s commitment. This is not a casual donation; it is a leadership priority for the controlling family of Next plc.

2. Dual-Use Industrial Base Support (Tefron & Delta Galil):

Next plc maintains Tier 1 supplier relationships with Tefron and Delta Galil, effectively sustaining the “warm industrial base” of the Israeli defense sector.

• Tefron – The Seamless Warrior: This Israeli manufacturer is a pioneer in “seamless” garment technology. While Next buys activewear from Tefron, the company has a documented history of supplying the IDF with tactical base layers and seamless underwear designed for combat loads.² The technology is classic “dual-use.” Next’s massive commercial orders help sustain Tefron’s R&D budget and manufacturing capacity. This ensures that the company remains solvent and capable of pivoting to defense production during national mobilizations.
• Delta Galil – The Defense Giant: Similarly, Delta Galil has historically produced socks and underwear for the IDF. By integrating Delta Galil into its “Total Platform” supply chain (via Victoria’s Secret and Ted Baker), Next ensures the economic viability of a key supplier to the Israeli military.⁶ The sheer volume of Next’s orders contributes to the economies of scale that allow Delta Galil to supply the military cost-effectively.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: The donations are “personal” to the CEO, not corporate.
• Rebuttal: In a founder-led/dynastic firm like Next, the distinction is porous. The CEO’s ability to donate millions is entirely contingent on the corporation’s performance. Furthermore, the reputational capital of the CEO is inseparable from the brand. The “tone at the top” dictates corporate culture, and the CEO’s public association with military charities signals a permissive environment for Zionism within the firm.
• Counter-Argument: Beit Halochem is a “charity” for disabled people.
• Rebuttal: It is a charity exclusively for military personnel of a specific state. It excludes civilian victims of the same conflict (unless they are victims of terror, defined selectively). Supporting the rehabilitation of a combat force is a recognized form of military sustainment, distinct from humanitarian aid.

Analytical Assessment:

The complicity here is High Confidence. While Next plc does not sell weapons, its leadership actively finances the welfare of the military personnel using them. The “fungibility of aid” argument strongly suggests that this private funding acts as a direct subsidy to the Israeli defense budget.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Wolfson Family Charitable Trust -> Beit Halochem -> IDF Personnel
• Next plc -> Tefron -> IDF Tactical Garments
• Lord Simon Wolfson -> Trustee Role -> Direct Command Responsibility

Domain 2: Digital & Technographic Complicity (V-DIG)

Goal: To map the “technological stack” of Next plc and identify dependencies on Israeli military-grade cybersecurity and surveillance technologies, and to analyze the implications of its “Total Platform” model.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The “Unit 8200” Defense Stack:

The Technographic Audit identifies Next plc not as a passive user, but as a “Digital Landlord” that enforces an Israeli security stack. The company’s digital transformation (“Cloud Infinity”) has entrenched a “Defense in Depth” architecture built on Israeli military-grade tech.

• Check Point Software Technologies (Perimeter): The audit confirms Next utilizes Check Point firewalls.⁸ Check Point is the foundational firm of Israel’s cyber sector, founded by Unit 8200 veteran Gil Shwed. It guards the perimeter of Next’s vast e-commerce empire.
• Wiz (Cloud Security): As Next migrates to the cloud, it has integrated Wiz, a unicorn founded by the team behind Adallom (ex-Unit 8200). Wiz provides “agentless” visibility into cloud environments.⁸ The integration of Check Point and Wiz creates a “unified” security fabric that links the perimeter to the cloud, deepening the lock-in.
• SentinelOne (Endpoint) & CyberArk (Identity): The audit identifies the use of SentinelOne for endpoint protection (AI-driven behavioral analysis) and CyberArk for privileged access management. Both are premier Israeli security firms with deep ties to the defense establishment.
• Strategic Lock-in: The integration of these tools (Check Point feeding data to Wiz; SentinelOne signaling CyberArk) creates a “Vendor Mesh.” Next cannot easily rip out one without compromising the others. This creates a long-term, structural revenue stream for the Israeli defense-tech sector, funded by British retail profits.

2. Project Pegasus & The Panopticon:

Next plc is a founding financier of Project Pegasus, contributing to a £600,000 fund to operationalize facial recognition in UK policing.9

• The Surveillance Model: This project mirrors the “Blue Wolf” and “Red Wolf” initiatives used by the Israeli military in the West Bank—mass biometric data collection to identify “subjects of interest.” The project aims to run CCTV images through the Police National Database using facial recognition.
• Ideological Alignment: CEO Simon Wolfson previously served on the advisory board of Facewatch, a private facial recognition firm.²⁶ This suggests that the move to fund Project Pegasus is not an accidental operational decision but a strategic alignment with the ideology of “privatized surveillance” often championed by the Israeli tech sector. It represents the domestication of military-grade surveillance tactics for retail loss prevention.
• Civil Liberties Impact: Groups like Big Brother Watch have condemned the project as “Orwellian”.²⁷ By funding this, Next is actively normalizing the use of intrusive biometric surveillance in the public sphere.

3. The “Total Platform” Multiplier (Digital Sovereignty Denial):

This is the critical multiplier. When Gap UK, Reiss, or Joules sign up for Next’s “Total Platform,” they inherit this stack.25

• Forced Adoption: Gap UK does not choose its own firewall; it uses Next’s Check Point architecture. Reiss does not select its own endpoint protection; it gets SentinelOne.
• Impact: Next is effectively a “wholesaler” of Israeli cybersecurity, forcing it upon the UK high street. A vote for Next’s platform is a vote for the Unit 8200 stack. This denies third-party brands their digital sovereignty, making them unknowingly complicit in the support of the Israeli tech economy.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: These are best-in-class security tools used by everyone.
• Rebuttal: While they are market leaders, the concentration of Israeli vendors (Perimeter, Cloud, Endpoint, Identity) represents a specific strategic dependency. Other global alternatives exist (Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike—though some have their own issues, the specific density of Israeli tech here is notable). Next has made a choice to build a homogeneous Israeli stack.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence. The “Total Platform” model amplifies the impact of Next’s procurement decisions, making it a key distribution node for Israeli technology in the UK. The support for Project Pegasus reveals a disturbing alignment with surveillance-state methodologies.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Total Platform -> Gap/Reiss/Joules -> Check Point/Wiz
• Project Pegasus -> Facial Recognition -> Surveillance State Normalization
• Lord Wolfson -> Facewatch Advisory Board -> Biometric Advocacy

Domain 3: Economic & Structural Complicity (V-ECON)

Goal: To evaluate Next plc’s integration with the Israeli economy, specifically regarding trade with settlement-complicit entities and the normalization of occupied territory.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Delta Galil Strategic Partnership:

Next plc’s relationship with Delta Galil Industries serves as the anchor of its economic complicity.

• The Entity: Delta Galil is listed on the UN OHCHR database of companies involved in settlement activity due to its facilities in Ma’ale Adumim and Pisgat Ze’ev.⁷ It is not a neutral actor; it is an active participant in the settlement enterprise.
• The Partnership as Bailout: Next is not just a customer; it is a savior. By entering into a Joint Venture to run Victoria’s Secret UK, Next rescued a major client of Delta Galil.²¹ If VS UK had collapsed, Delta Galil would have lost millions in orders. Next’s intervention stabilized this revenue stream, ensuring the continued viability of the Israeli firm’s export model.
• Licensing – The Ted Baker Deal: The Ted Baker licensing deal gives Delta Galil control over the design and manufacture of Next-retailed goods.⁵ This elevates Delta Galil from a hidden supplier to a brand partner.
• The “Headquarters Economy” & Origin Washing: While physical manufacturing may occur in Delta Galil’s Egyptian or Vietnamese factories (often under QIZ agreements that require Israeli inputs), the profits flow to the Tel Aviv headquarters, generating tax revenue for the Israeli state. As the Importer of Record, Next facilitates this “Origin Washing,” allowing settlement-linked capital to enter the UK market under the guise of “Made in Vietnam” labels.

2. Reiss & The Mamilla Mall (Green Line Erasure):

Next plc owns a majority stake (72%) in Reiss.28

• The Location: Reiss operates a store in Mamilla Mall.¹¹ This mall is located on the former “No Man’s Land” between West and East Jerusalem. It is a flagship project of the “reunification” narrative, designed to stitch the occupied Old City into the commercial fabric of West Jerusalem.
• Normalization: By operating here, Next/Reiss treats occupied territory as a standard luxury retail zone. This contributes to the “facts on the ground” that make a future Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem economically impossible. It is a clear act of Commercial Normalization.

3. “NextDirect” & Settlement Deliveries:

Next operates a localized e-commerce site, next.co.il, which is highly popular in Israel.

• Logistics Partner: The company uses GCX for logistics.¹²
• The Breach: The platform does not distinguish between Israel and West Bank settlements. A settler in Ariel can order Next clothing, and it will be delivered by GCX. This treats the settlements as sovereign Israeli territory, violating the differentiation required by UN Security Council Resolution 2334. The “Nationwide Coverage” claimed by the logistics partner is a political euphemism for “Greater Israel.”

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Next claimed to stop sourcing from settlements in 2010.
• Rebuttal: That policy covered sourcing (upstream), not selling (downstream). They stopped paying settlers for dates (allegedly) but continue to accept money from settlers for clothes. Moreover, the Delta Galil partnership contradicts the spirit of that policy, as Delta Galil is a settlement actor. The “safe harbor” of the 2010 statement has expired in the face of new structural entanglements.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence. The integration with Delta Galil is structural and strategic. The presence in Mamilla Mall is a clear act of normalization. The “Total Platform” acts as a force multiplier for this economic integration.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Next plc -> Victoria’s Secret JV -> Delta Galil -> Settlement Economy
• Reiss -> Mamilla Mall -> Green Line Erasure
• NextDirect -> GCX -> Settlement Deliveries

Domain 4: Political & Ideological Complicity (V-POL)

Goal: To analyze the ideological footprint of the leadership and the company’s geopolitical positioning.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The “Double Standard” (Ukraine vs. Gaza):

A comparative analysis of Next plc’s crisis response reveals a definitive, ideologically driven bias.

• Ukraine (2022): Within days of the invasion, Next “completely halted” its Russian website (next.ru), divested its Russian assets, and issued statements condemning the war.¹⁴ They implemented specific guidelines to help Ukrainian refugees in their supply chain, translating documents into Ukrainian and Polish.²⁹
• Gaza (2023-2024): Despite a death toll far exceeding the early stages of the Ukraine war, Next has maintained full operations in Israel (next.co.il). There have been no statements of solidarity, no humanitarian aid for Gazan workers, and no pause in operations.
• Implication: This demonstrates that the company’s “ethics” are aligned with UK foreign policy and Zionist interests. Russian aggression is a “red line” warranting immediate commercial sacrifice; Israeli aggression is a “market condition” to be managed. This destroys the company’s claim to political neutrality.

2. The Conservative-Zionist Nexus:

Lord Wolfson is a key figure in the Conservative Party, which has staunchly supported Israel’s military campaigns.

• Lobbying: He acts as a bridge between the corporate world and the political establishment. His funding of think tanks like Policy Exchange and Civitas (via the family trust) helps shape a domestic political discourse that is securitized and hostile to pro-Palestinian activism.⁴ These think tanks often frame BDS as “extremism,” creating a hostile environment for ethical accountability.
• The “Wolfson” Confusion: While his father (Baron Wolfson of Sunningdale) and cousin (Lord David Wolfson) are also prominent, Simon’s specific role as Trustee of the WFCT links him directly to the funding of Beit Halochem. The family operates as a cohesive ideological block, leveraging their combined wealth and political status to shield the Zionist project from criticism.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Companies must follow sanctions. There are sanctions on Russia, not Israel.
• Rebuttal: Next’s exit from Russia preceded many mandatory sanctions and was framed as a moral choice. The lack of a similar moral choice regarding Gaza indicates the double standard. A truly neutral company would either divest from both conflict zones or remain in both; Next’s divergence proves its bias.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence. The leadership is not neutral. It is actively ideological, using corporate resources to fund political and military-welfare projects. The double standard regarding Ukraine and Gaza is undeniable proof of selective ethics.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Wolfson Family -> Conservative Party -> Policy Exchange
• Ukraine Response vs Gaza Response -> Double Standard

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary:

Final Score: 613

Tier: Tier B (Severe Complicity)

Justification Summary:

Next plc presents a distinct profile of “Severe Complicity” (Tier B) driven primarily by the Political and Economic domains. While the company is not a direct military contractor (V-MIL: 0.0 impact under strict kinetic definitions), its executive leadership functions as a significant financial node for the Israeli military establishment via the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust (V-POL). Structurally, the “Total Platform” model creates systemic dependency on the Israeli “Unit 8200” cyber-stack (Check Point, Wiz), effectively enforcing these vendors on third-party clients like Gap and Reiss. Economically, the company is strategically integrated with Delta Galil Industries (a UN-blacklisted settlement entity) and operates retail nodes in the Mamilla Mall (Occupied East Jerusalem), actively participating in the economic normalization of the occupation.

Domain Scoring Summary

The BDS-1000 model requires a separate evaluation of the target’s complicity across four domains: Military (V-MIL), Digital (V-DIG), Economic (V-ECON), and Political (V-POL).

BDS-1000 Scoring Matrix – Next plc

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Economic (V-ECON)	5.8	8.5	7.5	5.8
Political (V-POL)	8.5	6.5	8.5	7.89
Digital (V-DIG)	3.8	8.0	8.0	3.8

Detailed Calculations:

1. Military (V-MIL)

• Impact (I=0.0): No direct manufacturing of kinetic weapons. The funding of AWIS is mapped to Political (V-POL) as “Direct Financing” rather than direct military provisioning.
• Magnitude (M=0.0): N/A.
• Proximity (P=0.0): N/A.
• Calculation:
  $$V_{MIL} = 0.0 \times 0 \times 0 = 0.0$$

2. Economic (V-ECON)

• Impact (I=5.8): Operational Presence (Mamilla Mall) + Strategic Partnership with Settlement Entity (Delta Galil). This score reflects “Moderate-High” integration surpassing simple trade.
• Magnitude (M=8.5): “Whale” client status for Delta Galil; high volume of VAT generation in Israel via NextDirect. (
  $$8.5/7 = 1.21 \rightarrow 1$$
  )
• Proximity (P=7.5): Active Parent (Reiss ownership, VS JV). (
  $$7.5/7 = 1.07 \rightarrow 1$$
  )
• Calculation:
  $$V_{ECON} = 5.8 \times 1 \times 1 = 5.8$$

3. Political (V-POL)

• Impact (I=8.5): Direct Financing of Military Welfare (Beit Halochem) via CEO’s Trust. This is the highest severity non-kinetic impact (“Direct Financing”).
• Magnitude (M=6.5): Significant Scale (£600k+ donations). (
  $$6.5/7 = 0.928$$
  )
• Proximity (P=8.5): Controller/Architect (CEO is Trustee). (
  $$8.5/7 = 1.21 \rightarrow 1$$
  )
• Calculation:
  $$V_{POL} = 8.5 \times 0.928 \times 1 = 7.89$$

4. Digital (V-DIG)

• Impact (I=3.8): Soft Dual-Use Procurement (Check Point/Wiz).
• Magnitude (M=8.0): Systemic Importance (“Digital Landlord” enforcing stack on others). (
  $$8.0/7 = 1.14 \rightarrow 1$$
  )
• Proximity (P=8.0): Active Parent (Centralized IT mandate). (
  $$8.0/7 = 1.14 \rightarrow 1$$
  )
• Calculation:
  $$V_{DIG} = 3.8 \times 1 \times 1 = 3.8$$

Final Composite Score

$$V_{MAX} = 7.89$$

(Political)

$$Sum_{OTHERS} = (0.0 + 5.8 + 3.8) = 9.6$$

BRS Score Formula:

$$BRS\_Score = ((7.89 + (9.6 \times 0.2)) / 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = ((7.89 + 1.92) / 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = (9.81 / 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = 0.6131 \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = 613$$

Grade Classification:

Tier: Tier B (Severe Complicity)

6. Recommended Action(s)

The forensic analysis suggests that Next plc is a highly resilient target due to its “Digital Landlord” status. A boycott of Next is effectively a boycott of Gap UK, Reiss, Victoria’s Secret UK, and Joules. Therefore, the strategy must be surgical and targeted at the “Complicity Multipliers.”

1. Strategic Divestment (Institutional Pressure):

Campaigners should focus on the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust’s link to Beit Halochem. This is a massive reputational vulnerability. Shareholders, particularly ethical pension funds, should be asked: “Why is the CEO using wealth derived from this company to fund the rehabilitation of foreign military personnel involved in alleged war crimes?” This question should be raised at AGMs, specifically targeting the “Double Standard” between the Ukraine/Refugee support and the Gaza/Soldier support. The demand should be for a clear separation of corporate governance from Zionist philanthropy or the resignation of the CEO.

2. Supply Chain Uncoupling (Delta Galil):

Pressure should be applied to Victoria’s Secret (US parent) and Gap Inc. (US parent) regarding their UK Joint Ventures. These global brands are being dragged into complicity by Next’s supply chain decisions. Demands should be made for them to audit their UK partner’s supply chain to ensure no goods from Delta Galil’s settlement-linked supply chain are entering their inventory. This creates a wedge between Next and its high-value partners.

3. “Don’t Buy Into Occupation” (Mamilla Mall):

Specific focus should be placed on Reiss. As a premium brand, it is sensitive to brand image. Highlighting the location of its store in the Mamilla Mall—built on the seam line to normalize annexation—can be effective. Consumers should be educated that buying a Reiss suit in London subsidizes a store that erases the Green Line in Jerusalem. This is a tangible, geographical target for protests.

4. Public Exposure of Surveillance Funding:

Leverage the Project Pegasus finding. Privacy rights groups (like Liberty and Big Brother Watch) are natural allies. A campaign highlighting Next plc as a financier of “mass facial recognition” in the UK creates a domestic wedge issue that broadens the coalition beyond Palestine solidarity groups, drawing in civil libertarians who oppose the surveillance state. This delegitimizes Next’s corporate social responsibility claims.

5. Monitoring of Total Platform Expansion:

The “Total Platform” is the future of Next. Activists must monitor which new brands sign up. Every new brand (e.g., JoJo Maman Bébé) that joins the platform is effectively “capturing” a new segment of the market into the Israeli cyber-stack. Pre-emptive campaigns warning brands not to join the Total Platform due to “Digital Sovereignty” risks could be effective in slowing Next’s expansion.

Works cited

1. Next Calc v2
2. Next military Audit
3. BHUK Annual Dinner Brochure 2024 by beithalochem – Issuu, accessed December 9, 2025, https://issuu.com/beithalochem/docs/bhuk_annual_dinner_brochure_2024
4. How British ‘charities’ are aiding Israeli genocide in Gaza :: nournews, accessed December 9, 2025, https://nournews.ir/en/news/163820/How-British-%E2%80%98charities%E2%80%99-are-aiding-Israeli-genocide-in-Gaza
5. Next economic Audit
6. Company – Segments – Delta Galil, accessed December 9, 2025, https://deltagalil.com/company/segments/default.aspx
7. Database of Business Enterprises Pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolutions 31/36 and 53/25 | OHCHR, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/en/business/bhr-database
8. Next digital Audit
9. GIVEN THE GO AHEAD: RETAILERS SHOULD FEEL CONFIDENT USING FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY IN FIGHT AGAINST RETAIL CRIME, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.thefacerecognitioncompany.com/news/given-the-go-ahead
10. Next PLC Technologies Stack and Company Profile – Enlyft, accessed December 9, 2025, https://enlyft.com/tech/company/nextplc.co.uk
11. International Stores – REISS Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.reiss.com/sa/en/store-locator
12. Next political Audit
13. Frequently Asked Questions – Newly Added – Office of Foreign Assets Control – Treasury.gov, accessed December 9, 2025, https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/added
14. #LeaveRussia: Next is Exiting the Russian Market, accessed December 9, 2025, https://leave-russia.org/next
15. Next plc – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_plc
16. History – The Wolfson Foundation, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.wolfson.org.uk/about/history/
17. Simon Wolfson – Powerbase.info, accessed December 9, 2025, https://powerbase.info/index.php/Simon_Wolfson
18. THE CHARLES WOLFSON CHARITABLE TRUST – 238043 – Charity Commission, accessed December 9, 2025, https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/about-the-register-of-charities/-/charity-details/238043/full-print
19. About Next PLC (NXT) – Investing.com, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/next-company-profile
20. Our History – NEXT plc, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.nextplc.co.uk/about-next/our-history
21. L Brands Announces Partnership with Next PLC for Victoria’s Secret UK – GlobeNewswire, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/09/14/2093290/0/en/L-Brands-Announces-Partnership-with-Next-PLC-for-Victoria-s-Secret-UK.html
22. Acquisition of Warburg Pincus’ Interest in Reiss, accessed December 9, 2025, https://warburgpincus.com/2023/09/01/acquisition-of-warburg-pincus-interest-in-reiss/
23. Gap and Next’s joint venture agreement bears fruit – Just Style, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.just-style.com/news/gap-and-nexts-joint-venture-agreement-bears-fruit/
24. Retail violence — Government launches Project Pegasus – Weightmans, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.weightmans.com/media-centre/news/retail-violence-government-launches-project-pegasus/
25. Next accelerates Joules transition with Total Platform – Just Style, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.just-style.com/news/next-accelerates-joules-transition-with-total-platform/
26. Simon Wolfson – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Wolfson
27. Shoplifting crackdown to include £55m for facial recognition tools in England and Wales, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/10/shoplifting-crackdown-to-include-55m-for-facial-recognition-tools-in-england-and-wales
28. Next buys Warburg Pincus’ stake in Reiss for £128 million | Retail Bulletin, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theretailbulletin.com/fashion/next-buys-warburg-pincus-stake-in-reiss-for-128-million-01-09-2023/
29. ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS – NEXT plc, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.nextplc.co.uk/~/media/Files/N/next-plc-v4/about-next/annual-report-and-accounts-jan-2024.pdf