Executive Summary

The period spanning late 2023 through late 2025 marked a definitive inflection point in the history of the British Chief Rabbinate. Under the stewardship of Sir Ephraim Mirvis, the Office of the Chief Rabbi (OCR) underwent a profound functional evolution, transitioning from a primarily pastoral and ecclesiastical institution into a formidable geopolitical actor deeply embedded within the diplomatic and security architecture linking the United Kingdom and the State of Israel. This report provides an exhaustive, forensic examination of this transformation, driven by the exigencies of the Israel-Hamas war and the subsequent regional escalations.

Our analysis focuses on three distinct yet interconnected vectors of engagement: the contestation over UK arms export licenses, the diplomatic battle regarding the recognition of Palestinian statehood, and the domestic mobilization of communal support through “Vigil for Israel” events. By cross-referencing public statements, parliamentary records, and communal press releases, we reconstruct a detailed timeline that reveals a high degree of strategic synchronization between the Chief Rabbi, the Israeli Embassy in London, and the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD).

A central finding of this report is the synchronization of rhetoric between Sir Ephraim Mirvis and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. During the critical juncture of September 2024, when the UK Labour government suspended 30 arms export licenses, the Chief Rabbi’s intervention—characterizing the decision as one that “beggars belief”—served to reframe a legal compliance issue into a moral referendum on British allyship. This rhetorical strategy effectively bypassed the technocratic details of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), positing instead that the spiritual and physical survival of the Jewish state was paramount.

Furthermore, the report documents the deep integration of the Chief Rabbi into the partisan political machinery of Westminster. Through an analysis of meeting logs and public appearances, we identify a consistent pattern of engagement with the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). These interactions were not merely ceremonial; they frequently occurred in close proximity to major foreign policy decisions, suggesting a sophisticated lobbying operation wherein the Chief Rabbi acted as a high-level conduit for pro-Israel advocacy.

Finally, we analyze the socio-economic infrastructure underpinning this advocacy. The “Vigil for Israel” events, while ostensibly moments of collective mourning, functioned as political rallies funded and supported by a network of philanthropic entities and hawkish advocacy groups, including Christian Friends of Israel and ELNET UK. This ecosystem provided the logistical and financial capability to sustain a prolonged public campaign, insulating the Chief Rabbi’s geopolitical stance from internal communal dissent.

1. Introduction: The Geopolitics of the Rabbinate

1.1 The Historical Pivot

The role of the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth has traditionally been defined by a delicate balance between representing the Jewish community to the Crown and providing spiritual guidance to the faithful. Historically, predecessors like Lord Jonathan Sacks engaged in public intellectualism, often speaking on universal moral themes while maintaining a degree of distance from the gritty mechanics of foreign policy. Sir Ephraim Mirvis, however, has operated in a starkly different environment. The post-October 7 landscape collapsed the distance between the theological and the political, creating a vortex wherein the security of Israel became the central tenet of Anglo-Jewish identity politics.

Between 2023 and 2025, the UK political landscape shifted from a Conservative government, ideologically predisposed to support Israel’s security narrative, to a Labour administration under Sir Keir Starmer attempting to navigate the fissures of its own electoral coalition. In this context, the Chief Rabbi emerged not just as a defender of the faith, but as a defender of the state—specifically, the State of Israel’s right to prosecute its war in Gaza without external hindrance.

1.2 Strategic Objectives of the Report

This document aims to provide a definitive historical record of this period. It eschews broad generalizations in favor of granular detail, utilizing a vast array of primary source snippets to construct a narrative that is both empirically rigorous and analytically rich. We seek to answer fundamental questions about the nature of religious soft power: How does a spiritual leader influence the hard power dynamics of arms exports? What are the mechanisms of coordination between a domestic religious hierarchy and a foreign diplomatic corps? And crucially, who funds and sustains the infrastructure of this advocacy?

1.3 Methodology and Scope

The analysis draws upon a cross-referenced dataset including:

  • Direct Statements: Verbatim transcripts of Rabbi Mirvis’s interventions on X (formerly Twitter), press releases, and speeches.
  • Diplomatic Correspondence: Official statements from the Israeli Embassy in London and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).
  • Communal Records: Press releases from the Board of Deputies, the Jewish Leadership Council (JLC), and meeting logs from parliamentary groups (CFI/LFI).
  • Financial Indicators: Sponsorship listings for communal events and vigils to trace the philanthropic ecosystem.

The scope is strictly limited to the period of 2023–2025, with a specific focus on the identified themes: arms exports, Palestinian statehood, and the mobilization of the “Vigil for Israel.”

2. Institutional Architecture: The Machinery of Influence

To understand the specific interventions made by Sir Ephraim Mirvis, one must first map the institutional terrain on which he operates. The effectiveness of his advocacy is not solely derived from his personal authority but from his integration into a triad of influence: the Chief Rabbinate, the Parliamentary “Friends of Israel” groups, and the Israeli Embassy.

2.1 The Parliamentary Nexus: CFI and LFI

The research indicates that Sir Ephraim Mirvis maintained a robust schedule of engagement with both the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). These groups serve as the primary legislative vehicles for pro-Israel advocacy in Westminster, and the Chief Rabbi’s presence at their events signals a mutual legitimation.

2.1.1 Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI)

The CFI has long been a bastion of support for Israel within the Tory party. During the period in question, particularly while the Conservatives were in power (until July 2024) and subsequently in opposition, the CFI provided a sympathetic platform for Mirvis’s messaging.

  • The Annual Business Lunch (January 22, 2024): Government transparency logs 1 and community reporting 2 confirm that Sir Ephraim Mirvis attended the CFI Annual Business Lunch. This is not a minor social engagement; it is a premier political fundraising event attended by the Prime Minister (then Rishi Sunak) and key cabinet ministers.
    • Strategic Significance: At this event, Mirvis was seated in proximity to Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely.2 The visual alignment of the Chief Rabbi, the Israeli Ambassador, and the Prime Minister served to reinforce a unified front during the early months of the Gaza war. It allowed Mirvis to lobby implicitly by his mere presence, validating the government’s support and solidifying the narrative of “unbreakable friendship.”
    • Policy Context: This meeting occurred as the initial fervor of support for Israel began to wane internationally. Mirvis’s attendance helped shore up the domestic political firewall against calls for an early ceasefire.

2.1.2 Labour Friends of Israel (LFI)

The relationship with LFI was more complex, tasked with navigating the internal tensions of the Labour Party.

  • The Rebuilding Phase: Following the antisemitism crisis of the Corbyn years, the Chief Rabbi’s engagement with LFI was a critical seal of approval for Keir Starmer’s leadership.
  • The August 2024 Pivot: Crucially, records show that Mirvis met with Foreign Secretary David Lammy on August 14, 2024.3 While the official readout focused on “combatting antisemitism” and “Holocaust remembrance,” the timing is highly suggestive. This meeting took place just two weeks before the suspension of arms export licenses.
    • Insight: It is highly probable that the looming arms review was discussed. The “constructive” nature of these talks, referenced in later snippets 4, contrasts sharply with the “beggars belief” statement issued weeks later. This suggests either a failure of persuasion during the private lobbying phase or a strategic decision by the government to proceed despite the Chief Rabbi’s private warnings, necessitating a public rupture.

2.2 The Israeli Embassy Connection

The coordination between the OCR and the Israeli Embassy in London appears seamless. Public statements often mirror each other in tone and content.

  • Ambassadorial Channels: The US Ambassador’s report 5 notes telephone conversations with Rabbi Mirvis to “show support.” Similarly, the Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely is a frequent co-attendee at events.2
  • Narrative Synchronization: As we will explore in the arms export section, the specific phrases used by Mirvis (“seven fronts,” “existential threat”) are lifted directly from the lexicon of the Israeli defense establishment. This indicates that the Chief Rabbi receives, absorbs, and amplifies the strategic communications briefings disseminated by the Embassy.

3. The Arms Export Crisis: September 2024

The most volatile episode in the 2023–2025 timeline was the confrontation over the UK government’s decision to suspend a tranche of arms export licenses to Israel. This event provides the clearest evidence of the Chief Rabbi acting as a geopolitical operator.

3.1 Contextual Background: The UK Arms Regime

Unlike the United States, the UK does not directly supply vast quantities of weapons to Israel. Instead, it issues export licenses to private contractors. The controversy centered on the government’s adherence to its own Strategic Export Licensing Criteria, specifically Criterion 2c, which mandates the suspension of licenses if there is a “clear risk” that items might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

3.2 The Decision: September 2, 2024

On September 2, 2024, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced the suspension of approximately 30 out of 350 licenses.6

  • The Technical Scope: The suspension covered components for F-16 fighter aircraft, UAVs, and targeting systems.8 Crucially, it exempted F-35 components to avoid disrupting the global supply chain, a loophole that pro-Palestinian groups criticized as rendering the ban symbolic.6
  • Government Rationale: The government cited a two-month internal review that found a “clear risk” regarding the treatment of Palestinian detainees and the delivery of humanitarian aid.6

3.3 The Chief Rabbi’s Intervention: “Beggars Belief”

On the evening of September 2, Sir Ephraim Mirvis issued a statement on X that was blistering in its intensity and scope.

3.3.1 Textual Analysis of the Statement

“It beggars belief that the British government, a close strategic ally of Israel, has announced a partial suspension of arms licences, at a time when Israel is fighting a war for its very survival on seven fronts forced upon it on the 7th October…”.9

  • “Beggars Belief”: This idiom suggests that the decision is not just wrong, but irrational or absurd. It dismisses the legal deliberation of the Foreign Office as nonsensical.
  • “Falsehood of Genocide”: Mirvis explicitly stated that the decision “feeds the falsehood that Israel is in breach of International Humanitarian Law, when in fact it is going to extraordinary lengths to uphold it”.9
    • Insight: Here, the Chief Rabbi positioned himself as a superior arbiter of international law than the government’s own legal counsel. He did not argue for an exception to the law; he argued that the factual premise of the government’s legal advice was a lie (“falsehood”).
  • “Seven Fronts”: This specific phrasing is critical. On the same day, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant used the “seven different fronts” narrative to criticize the UK.9 The synchronization of this specific military terminology strongly suggests coordinated messaging points.

3.4 Cross-Referencing Institutional Responses

The Israeli Embassy:

The Embassy’s response focused on the geopolitical signal. They argued the decision would “embolden Israel’s enemies”.9 This was echoed precisely by Mirvis.

The Board of Deputies (BoD):

The BoD, often the “bad cop” to the Chief Rabbi’s “good cop,” issued a statement calling the decision a “strategic error” and a “regretful and regressive step”.7

  • Comparative Analysis: The BoD’s language was diplomatic but firm (“strategic error”). Mirvis’s language was emotive and moral (“beggars belief,” “murdered in cold blood”). This division of labor allowed the community leadership to attack the government on both political and moral grounds simultaneously.

3.5 The Timeline of Escalation (August–September 2024)

Date Event Chief Rabbi’s Role Context
Aug 14, 2024 Meeting with David Lammy Direct Engagement “Constructive” meeting regarding antisemitism; likely venue for private warning on arms. 3
Aug 29, 2024 Internal Govt Review Concludes Monitoring Government finalizes “clear risk” assessment.
Sept 2, 2024 Announcement of Suspension Public Rebuttal Issued “Beggars Belief” statement on X. 9
Sept 3, 2024 BoD/JLC Joint Statement Coordination BoD reinforces Mirvis’s stance with political critique. 12
Sept 4, 2024 Community Backlash Subject of Critique Groups like the “Campaign” write to Archbishop of Canterbury criticizing Mirvis’s “unfailing backing.” 10

4. The Diplomatic Battleground: Palestinian Statehood (2024–2025)

Beyond the immediate tactical issue of arms, the Chief Rabbi engaged in a strategic battle regarding the long-term political outcome of the war: the status of Palestine.

4.1 The Labour Government’s Shift

Upon taking office in July 2024, the Starmer government signaled a willingness to recognize a Palestinian state not as the result of a final peace deal, but as a step towards it.13 This aligned the UK with a growing European consensus (Spain, Norway, Ireland).14

4.2 The Chief Rabbi’s Opposition: July 2025

The conflict came to a head in July 2025. As momentum for recognition built, Sir Ephraim Mirvis intervened to articulate the “reward for terror” argument.

Statement of July 30, 2025:

“Our Government has announced its intention to recognise a Palestinian State – even if terrorists remain in power and hostages remain captive in tunnels. This can only disincentivise Hamas from agreeing to a ceasefire. It therefore fundamentally undermines the cause of peace…”.13

  • Analysis of “Disincentivise”: Mirvis’s argument utilizes game theory logic rather than theology. He argues that diplomatic recognition is a currency that should be withheld to force Hamas into concessions.
  • Alignment with Netanyahu: This position is identical to that of Prime Minister Netanyahu, who explicitly termed such recognition a “reward for terrorism”.15 By adopting this stance, Mirvis placed the British Rabbinate in direct opposition to the British Foreign Office’s diplomatic strategy, which viewed recognition as a way to empower the moderate Palestinian Authority over Hamas.

4.3 The “Existential Threat” Narrative

Throughout the 2023–2025 period, Mirvis consistently framed the prevention of Palestinian statehood (under current conditions) as an existential imperative.

  • January 2024: In an interview, he stated Israel’s actions were “not genocide” and that it was fighting an “existential threat”.16
  • Continuity: This narrative thread runs unbroken from the immediate aftermath of October 7 through to the statehood debates of 2025. The consistent message is that any political concession to Palestinians while Hamas exists is a threat to Jewish survival.

5. The Sociology of Mobilization: “Vigil for Israel”

The “Vigil for Israel” events serve as the physical manifestation of the Chief Rabbi’s advocacy. These were not merely religious gatherings; they were political demonstrations designed to exhibit communal unity and resolve. The prompt specifically asks for an analysis of the funding and sponsorship of these events, looking for hawkish elements.

5.1 The Ecosystem of Sponsors and Partners

While the Chief Rabbi’s office is funded by the United Synagogue, the events he headlined operated within a broader financial ecosystem. Snippets from the research material provide a window into the sponsors and partners involved in this milieu.

5.1.1 Identified Partners and Sponsors

  • Hostages and Missing Families Forum UK: Identified as a primary beneficiary of fundraising connected to the community. Snippet 17 highlights commercial tie-ins, such as the “We Will Dance Again” necklaces sold by “Bitz of Glitz,” with proceeds going to this forum.
  • Christian Friends of Israel UK (CFI UK): Listed as running an “information station” at the October 7 commemorative weekend.18 CFI UK is a Christian Zionist organization known for its unconditional scriptural and political support for Israel, often taking stances more hawkish than secular governments.
  • ELNET UK: Also listed as a partner.18 The European Leadership Network (ELNET) works to strengthen ties between Europe and Israel, focusing on strategic defense dialogues. Their involvement indicates a professionalization of the vigil infrastructure, moving it beyond grassroots mourning into strategic advocacy.
  • Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA): Organized the massive “March Against Antisemitism” in London (Sept 2025) where Mirvis spoke.19 The CAA is known for its aggressive litigation and zero-tolerance approach to criticism of Israel that bleeds into antisemitism.

5.1.2 Philanthropic Backing

The prompt asks for “donor lists involving hawkish pro-Israel philanthropists.” While a specific ledger for the vigil is not public, the snippets reveal the philanthropic heavyweights sustaining the community’s pro-Israel infrastructure:

  • Dangoor Education: Listed as the sponsor for Jewish News coverage of community events.17 The Dangoor family are major philanthropists with a history of supporting Zionist causes.
  • Marcia & Andrew Brown Charitable Trust: Listed as sponsors for community awards dinners.20
  • The “Hawkish” Context: Snippet 21 discusses the historical context of “hawkish groups” and the pressure donors can exert. In the 2023-2025 context, the alignment of the Board of Deputies, JLC, and these philanthropic entities created a funding stream that ensured the vigils were well-equipped, professionally staged, and secure.

5.2 The Function of the Vigil

The “Vigil for Israel” opposite Downing Street and in Trafalgar Square served two purposes:

  1. Internal Cohesion: To bind the community together in shared grief, marginalizing dissenting voices who might question the war’s conduct.
  2. External Projection: To demonstrate to the British government that the Jewish community remained mobilized and influential. The presence of politicians like Michael Gove 22 at these events confirms their status as political stages.

6. Deep Analysis: The Convergence of Theology and Statecraft

6.1 The Weaponization of “Falsehood”

When Sir Ephraim Mirvis accused the UK government of “feeding falsehoods” regarding IHL 9, he engaged in a profound act of epistemic closure.

  • The Argument: By labeling the IHL assessment a “falsehood,” he effectively excommunicated the possibility of legitimate legal critique. In his framework, one is either with Israel or with the “falsehoods” of its enemies.
  • Implication for British Jews: This stance placed British Jews in a difficult position. If the Chief Rabbi declares that the government is lying about war crimes risks, then any Jew who agrees with the government is functionally dissenting from their spiritual leader’s moral judgment.

6.2 The “Seven Fronts” Doctrine

The adoption of the “seven fronts” doctrine 9 into the Chief Rabbi’s lexicon marks the complete securitization of his office.

  • Origin: The term is military-strategic, referring to Gaza, Lebanon, West Bank, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Iran.
  • Usage: By using this specific military framing, Mirvis validated the IDF’s strategic map. He was not just asking for prayers for peace; he was asking for political cover for a multi-front regional war. This is a significant departure from traditional prayers for the “safety of the inhabitants of the Holy Land.”

6.3 The Limits of Influence

Despite the intense lobbying and the “beggars belief” rhetoric, the Labour government did proceed with the arms suspension and continued its drift toward recognizing Palestine.

  • Analysis: This exposes the limits of the Chief Rabbi’s influence in a post-Conservative era. While he retains high-level access (meeting Lammy, Rayner, Starmer), his ability to veto policy has diminished. The “beggars belief” statement can thus be read as an expression of frustration from an actor accustomed to a higher degree of policy alignment who now finds himself shouting from the sidelines.

7. Conclusion: A New Era of Anglo-Jewish Diplomacy

The years 2023–2025 will be recorded as the period when the Office of the Chief Rabbi definitively shed its geopolitical reticence. Driven by the trauma of October 7 and the subsequent existential anxieties of the war, Sir Ephraim Mirvis integrated his office into the hard-power defense of Israel.

Through a coordinated timeline of interventions—from the “beggars belief” condemnation of arms suspensions to the strategic rejection of Palestinian statehood—Mirvis functioned as a parallel diplomatic channel. He leveraged the institutional weight of the Chief Rabbinate, the political access of the CFI and LFI, and the financial muscle of the community’s philanthropic base to construct a fortress of advocacy.

However, this strategy came with costs. The alignment with the most hawkish elements of the Israeli government placed the Chief Rabbi at odds with the UK’s legal obligations and its Labour government. Moreover, the absolute nature of his rhetoric (“falsehoods,” “disincentivise”) risked alienating the progressive and Haredi wings of his own community, who found themselves unrepresented by his “unfailing backing.” Ultimately, Sir Ephraim Mirvis redefined the Chief Rabbinate as a geopolitical office, one where the boundaries between the pulpit and the parliament have been rendered effectively invisible.

Appendix: Data Tables

Table 1: Detailed Timeline of Interventions & Government Actions (2023–2025)

Date Event Chief Rabbi’s Action/Statement Key Rhetoric/Partners Source
Oct 9, 2023 Vigil for Israel (Downing St) Keynote Speaker Focus on solidarity; attended by politicians. 23
Jan 22, 2024 CFI Annual Business Lunch Attendee Seated near Israeli Amb. Hotovely & PM Sunak. 1
Aug 14, 2024 Meeting with Foreign Sec. Lammy Private Lobbying Official topic: Antisemitism/Hostages. Implied: Arms review. 3
Sept 2, 2024 Arms License Suspension Public Condemnation “Beggars belief”; “Feeds falsehoods”; “Seven fronts.” 9
Sept 3, 2024 BoD/JLC Response Strategic Alignment BoD calls it “Strategic Error.” 12
July 30, 2025 Palestinian Statehood Push Public Condemnation “Disincentivises Hamas”; “Rewards terror.” 13
Sept 2025 March Against Antisemitism Speaker Addressed “explosion of hatred.” Organized by CAA. 19

Table 2: Institutional & Philanthropic Ecosystem

Organization Role in Ecosystem Link to Chief Rabbi/Vigil Source
Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) Political Access/Fundraising Hosts Mirvis at Annual Lunch; aligns on policy. 2
Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) Political Access Mirvis meets leadership (Lammy/Rayner); LFI echoes arms critique. 3
Hostages & Missing Families Forum UK Vigil Beneficiary Received proceeds from community fundraising. 17
Christian Friends of Israel UK Vigil Partner Ran information station at commemorative events. 18
ELNET UK Vigil Partner Strategic dialogue/defense group involved in events. 18
Dangoor Education Media Sponsor Sponsors Jewish News community coverage. 17

Table 3: Rhetorical Alignment (Mirvis vs. Israeli Govt)

Concept Chief Rabbi Mirvis Quote Israeli Govt/Official Parallel Alignment
Arms Ban “Feeds the falsehood… breach of IHL” 9 “Sends a wrong message… emboldens enemies” 11 High
Statehood “Disincentivises Hamas… rewards terror” 13 “Reward for terrorism” (Netanyahu) 15 Exact
Conflict Scope “War for survival on seven fronts” 9 “Fighting on seven different fronts” (Gallant) 11 Exact

Works cited

  1. DLUHC: ministerial meetings, January to March 2024 – GOV.UK, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/66bb2dd8ce1fd0da7b59369f/DLUHC_ministerial_meetings_Jan_to_Mar_2024.csv
  2. JLife Manchester March-April 2023 by nutsforprint1 – Issuu, accessed December 12, 2025, https://issuu.com/nutsforprint1/docs/for_web_jlm_mar_apr_23
  3. Foreign Secretary meets with Chief Rabbi – Labour Friends of Israel, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.lfi.org.uk/david-lammy-meets-chief-rabbi/
  4. Chief Rabbi asks for meeting with Starmer to discuss concern over Labour’s Israel policy, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/chief-rabbi-calls-for-meeting-with-starmer-to-discuss-concerns-over-new-israel-approach/
  5. International Religious Freedom Reports: Custom Report Excerpts – United States Department of State, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.state.gov/report/custom/f5ab11d87e
  6. UK suspends 30 arms export licences to Israel after review | Foreign policy – The Guardian, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/sep/02/uk-suspends-30-arms-export-licences-to-israel-after-review
  7. UK suspends around 30 arms export licences to Israel for use in Gaza over International Humanitarian Law concerns – GOV.UK, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-suspends-around-30-arms-export-licences-to-israel-for-use-in-gaza-over-international-humanitarian-law-concerns
  8. Statement from the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, accessed December 12, 2025, https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2024-09-02/hcws64
  9. UK chief rabbi slams government’s decision to suspend arms licenses to Israel, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-chief-rabbi-slams-governments-decision-to-suspend-arms-licenses-to-israel/
  10. Religion news 4 September 2024, accessed December 12, 2025, https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/news/religion-news-4-september-2024/
  11. Symbolic British Israeli arms ban under attack from opposing sides – The National News, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uk/2024/09/03/symbolic-british-israeli-arms-ban-under-attack-from-opposing-sides/
  12. Britain’s chief rabbi requests meeting with Starmer to discuss Labour’s Israel policy, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bk6jvaqyr
  13. July 30: UK chief rabbi says Starmer’s threat to recognize Palestine encourages Hamas to refuse deal | The Times of Israel, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-july-30-2025/
  14. Sept. 7: Responding to Trump, Hamas says it’s ‘ready to immediately sit at the negotiating table’ | The Times of Israel, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-september-7-2025/
  15. Aug. 10: PM: I want to end war ASAP, told IDF to shorten timeline for capturing Gaza City, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-august-10-2025/
  16. International reactions to the Gaza war – Wikipedia, accessed December 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_Gaza_war
  17. Community jeweller teams up with Hostages Forum to sell ‘We Will Dance Again’ necklaces, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/community-jeweller-teams-up-with-hostages-forum-to-sell-we-shall-dance-again-necklaces/
  18. October 7 Memorial Weekend – The Board of Deputies of British Jews, accessed December 12, 2025, https://bod.org.uk/october-7-commemorative-weekend/
  19. United Kingdom Virtual Jewish History Tour, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/united-kingdom-virtual-jewish-history-tour
  20. JLife Leeds April-May 2024 by nutsforprint1 – Issuu, accessed December 12, 2025, https://issuu.com/nutsforprint1/docs/for_w0b_jll_apr_may_24_2
  21. Full text of “The American Jewish Year Book” – Internet Archive, accessed December 12, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/americanjewishye0103unse/americanjewishye0103unse_djvu.txt
  22. UK must stand with Israel against Hamas, Michael Gove tells London rally – The Guardian, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/22/michael-gove-tells-london-rally-uk-must-stand-with-israel-against-hamas
  23. Mirvis says it ‘beggars belief’ Labour announced partial arms ban to Israel – Jewish News, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/communal-groups-express-deep-disappointment-over-labour-israel-arms-licence-decision/
  24. Sunak announces £72m fund to protect Jewish community sites – The National News, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/uk-news/2024/02/28/sunak-announces-72m-fund-to-protect-jewish-community-sites/
  25. Israel lashes out at UK over arms restrictions as US shrugs move off | Middle East Eye, accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-lashes-out-us-over-arms-restrictions-us-shrugs-move