NatWest Economic Audit

Executive Summary

This comprehensive forensic audit and economic footprint analysis has been commissioned to evaluate the “Economic Complicity” of NatWest Group (formerly The Royal Bank of Scotland Group) regarding the occupation of Palestine, the Israeli military-industrial complex, and the settlement enterprise. Operating under the mandate of a Supply Chain Auditor and Forensic Accountant, this report synthesizes intelligence to map the “Aggregator Nexus” of capital, technology, and operational procurement that links the target institution to high-risk entities.

The investigation establishes that NatWest Group’s complicity profile is High, characterized not merely by passive index-tracking investments but by active capital enablement for UN-blacklisted conglomerates, deep operational integration of Israeli state-linked surveillance technologies, and sustained financing of the military manufacturers supplying the Israel Defence Forces (IDF).

Primary Forensic Findings:

The audit identifies a sophisticated mechanism of “Capital Laundering” whereby NatWest facilitates the flow of liquidity to the Israeli settlement enterprise through United Kingdom-based subsidiaries of blacklisted entities. The most egregious instance documented is the bank’s role as a lead underwriter for a £500 million bond issuance by Ithaca Energy, a North Sea operator that is 89% owned by the Delek Group. Delek Group is listed on the UN Human Rights Council’s database of business enterprises involved in the settlement economy due to its provision of fuel to the IDF and operation of retail stations in the West Bank. By underwriting this bond, NatWest effectively sanitized the reputational risk of the parent entity, providing essential capital that subsidizes the holding company’s broader activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).¹

In the domain of “Importer Status” and Technological Integration, the audit reveals that NatWest has established a High Proximity relationship with the Israeli surveillance apparatus. The bank has integrated BioCatch, a behavioral biometrics platform founded by veterans of the IDF’s Unit 8200 signals intelligence corps, into its core fraud prevention infrastructure.³ This procurement goes beyond standard software licensing; it represents the importation of “battle-tested” surveillance methodologies—originally honed on Palestinian populations—into the UK domestic banking sector. This relationship is further cemented by the appointment of former NatWest CEO Dame Alison Rose to the advisory board of ThetaRay, another Israeli AI firm, signaling a strategic and ideological endorsement of the Israeli fintech ecosystem at the highest governance levels.⁵

Regarding the “Aggregator Nexus” and “Fresh Produce” requirements, while NatWest is a financial institution rather than a retailer, its operational supply chain presents significant indirect exposure. The bank’s catering and facilities management partner, Sodexo, maintains active subsidiaries in Israel (Sodexo Catering Services Israel Ltd) and has recently deepened ties with Israeli food-tech firms.⁷ This creates a verifiable risk corridor where staff canteens and corporate events may serve as end-points for settlement-sourced goods, bypassing standard “Importer of Record” checks that would apply to a supermarket.

The financial analysis further confirms that NatWest remains a significant creditor to the Israeli banking sector—the primary financial engine of settlement expansion—with millions in assets managed or held in Israel Discount Bank, Bank Leumi, and Bank Hapoalim.⁹ These institutions are the mortgage lenders and construction financiers for illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Furthermore, NatWest persists as a lender and underwriter to Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest private arms manufacturer, despite the divestment actions of many European peers, exposing a critical failure in its Defence Sector Policy.⁹

This report details these findings through a rigorous forensic lens, categorizing complicity into Capital Enablement, Technological Importation, and Operational Supply Chain risks.

1. The Aggregator Nexus: Capital Laundering and Settlement Financing

In the context of a global financial institution, the “Aggregator Nexus” is not defined by the physical consolidation of agricultural produce, but rather by the aggregation of capital. Financial institutions act as the critical nodes that gather liquidity from global markets and direct it toward specific economic actors. A forensic review of NatWest’s underwriting and lending activities reveals a distinct pattern of “Capital Laundering”—a process where the bank provides legitimacy and liquidity to subsidiaries of companies directly complicit in the occupation, thereby bypassing ethical screens that might catch the parent entity.

1.1 The Ithaca Energy / Delek Group Mechanism

The most significant forensic evidence of “Settlement Laundering” is found in NatWest’s underwriting relationship with Ithaca Energy. This case study exemplifies how a bank can facilitate high-risk settlement actors while maintaining a veneer of domestic UK operational focus.

The Entity Structure and Risk Profile: Ithaca Energy is a significant oil and gas operator in the UK North Sea. However, the forensic trace of ownership reveals that it is a subsidiary of the Delek Group, an Israeli conglomerate headquartered in Tel Aviv.¹ The Delek Group is not a neutral commercial entity; it is listed on the UN Database of 112 business enterprises involved in activities that raise particular human rights concerns in the OPT. Its inclusion is due to its operation of petrol stations in illegal West Bank settlements and its contractual role in supplying fuel to the Israeli Ministry of Defence and the IDF.¹

The Transactional Evidence: In July 2021, NatWest (along with Lloyds Banking Group) acted as a Joint Bookrunner and Underwriter for a £500 million bond issuance by Ithaca Energy.¹

Forensic Implications of the Transaction:

This transaction constitutes a high-proximity complicity event. When a bank underwrites a bond, it essentially guarantees the sale of the debt, assuming the risk if investors fail to purchase it. By performing this function for Ithaca Energy, NatWest achieved the following:

1. Liquidity Injection: The £500 million raised provides substantial liquidity to the Delek Group’s consolidated balance sheet. Money is fungible; capital raised by a subsidiary strengthens the parent company’s ability to leverage debt and fund operations elsewhere, including in the settlement enterprise.
2. Reputational Laundering: Delek Group, as a UN-blacklisted entity, faces significant barriers to raising capital directly in European markets due to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) exclusions. By using its UK subsidiary Ithaca as the issuing vehicle, and having a reputable UK bank like NatWest underwrite it, the Delek Group effectively “washed” the settlement stain from the capital raise. The bond appears as a “UK Energy” investment rather than an “Israeli Settlement” investment.
3. Ideological Support: The continued support for Delek’s subsidiary, despite the parent company’s known role in fueling the IDF and settlements, signals that NatWest’s due diligence processes prioritize commercial opportunity over human rights compliance regarding the occupation.¹

1.2 Direct Financing of Settlement Infrastructure

Beyond the complex derivative support via subsidiaries, NatWest Group holds direct investment positions in multinational corporations that provide the physical material for settlement expansion. This falls under “Strategic FDI” (Foreign Direct Investment) support for the occupation’s infrastructure.

The Extractive Industry Nexus: The audit identifies NatWest as an investor in HeidelbergCement and Cemex.¹⁰ These companies are central to the physical construction of the occupation.

• HeidelbergCement: Through its subsidiary Hanson Israel, it operates the Nahal Raba quarry in the occupied West Bank.⁹
• Cemex: Operates the Yatir quarry in the South Hebron Hills.¹⁴
• Legal Implication: The extraction of natural resources (stone, aggregate) from occupied territory for the benefit of the occupying power’s economy violates the Hague Regulations (Article 55) regarding the laws of usufruct. NatWest’s investment in these firms finances the pillage of Palestinian natural resources. The generated materials are used to build settlement housing and infrastructure, creating a direct material link between NatWest’s capital and the physical expansion of colonies.

The Real Estate Nexus: NatWest is also identified as holding shares or bonds in RE/MAX Holdings.¹¹ RE/MAX Israel, the franchise holder, markets and sells properties located in illegal settlements across the West Bank, including in major blocks like Ma’ale Adumim and Efrat.¹⁵ This activity directly contravenes international law by facilitating the transfer of population into occupied territory. NatWest’s financial stake in the parent company indicates a failure to ringfence its portfolio from the profits of land seizure.

1.3 The Israeli Banking Sector Portfolio

The financial vascular system of the settlement enterprise is the Israeli banking sector. Israeli banks are legally and operationally integrated into the settlement economy; they are mandated by Israeli law to provide services to settlers and they hold the mortgages for homes built on stolen land.

Forensic analysis of shareholding data reveals that NatWest Group maintains financial relationships with the “Big Five” Israeli banks. This is not a passive holding but an active exposure to the architects of the settlement economy.

Table 1: NatWest Group Exposure to Israeli Financial Institutions

Forensic Insight: The data indicates that NatWest Group manages or holds approximately $89 million in Israel Discount Bank alone.⁹ This is a material position. Unlike manufacturing companies that may have a “dual use” argument, Israeli banks are monolithic in their support for the state’s national projects, including settlement expansion. Capital provided to Israel Discount Bank is fungible; it supports the bank’s capital adequacy ratio, allowing it to extend further loans to settlement developers like Shitrit Ayalon (active in Beitar Illit).¹⁶

2. The Supply Chain of Violence: Military Financing and “Sustained Trade”

In the forensic accounting of war crimes, the supply chain begins with the credit facility. Before a weapon can be manufactured or exported, the arms company requires working capital, guarantees, and insurance. NatWest Group plays a critical role in this “Sustained Trade” by acting as a creditor to the manufacturers supplying the IDF.

2.1 Elbit Systems: The Litmus Test of Complicity

Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest private military contractor and the primary supplier of the Hermes drone fleet, which has been extensively documented in use during bombardments of the Gaza Strip and surveillance operations in the West Bank.¹⁵

The Financial Link: Despite widespread divestment by other European financial institutions (such as KLP, Danske Bank, and AXA) due to ethical concerns, NatWest Group persists as a financier. The research identifies NatWest as having provided loans and underwriting services to Elbit Systems during the period from January 2021 to September 2024.⁹

Forensic Detail:

• Persistence: The data highlights that while peers have exited, NatWest has maintained its position. The “Don’t Buy Into Occupation” report lists NatWest as one of the banks providing liquidity to Elbit.⁹
• Mechanism: These are typically syndicated loans or revolving credit facilities. While the exact tranche attributable to NatWest is often obscured in syndicate structures, the bank’s participation signals a willingness to underwrite the operational costs of a company whose products are marketed as “combat-proven” on Palestinian populations.
• Recent Trends: Snippet ³² notes that since October 2023, Israeli arms manufacturers like Elbit have been in “peak demand.” NatWest’s continued financing during this period suggests a direct capitalization of the current escalation.

2.2 The Global Arms Supply Chain

NatWest’s “Defence Sector Policy” ostensibly restricts financing for controversial weapons. However, the audit reveals extensive exposure to international conglomerates that form the backbone of the Israeli military’s supply chain.

Table 2: Creditor Status for Key Military Suppliers

Sector Ranking: NatWest is ranked as the 18th largest European creditor to companies arming Israel.¹² This ranking is significant. It places NatWest in the top tier of financial enablers in Europe, distinguishing it from smaller retail banks. The “Armed Banking” report notes that NatWest is the 75th largest bank globally financing arms companies with exports linked to Gaza.¹²

2.3 Policy Failure Analysis

The discrepancy between NatWest’s stated ESG goals and its forensic footprint is explained by a specific policy loophole.

• The Policy: NatWest restricts financing for “controversial weapons” (defined narrowly as landmines, cluster munitions, and biological/chemical weapons).¹⁸
• The Loophole: The policy does not classify occupation enforcement weaponry—such as surveillance drones, white phosphorus munitions, or armored bulldozers—as “controversial.” Furthermore, the policy respects the “right of nations to protect their people” and relies on UK government export licensing as its moral compass.¹⁹ This effectively outsources ethical judgment to the state, allowing NatWest to finance Elbit Systems as long as the UK government continues to grant export licenses, ignoring independent assessments from the ICJ or UN bodies regarding the illegality of the occupation those weapons enforce.

3. Operational Integration: The “Importer of Record” for Surveillance Technology

In the digital economy, the “Importer of Record” is the entity that integrates foreign technology into domestic infrastructure. NatWest Group has moved beyond mere investment to become an active consumer and importer of Israeli state-linked surveillance technology. This establishes a High Proximity relationship where the bank’s own operations become dependent on the “Startup Nation” ecosystem, which is inextricably linked to the Israeli military apparatus.

3.1 BioCatch: Importing Unit 8200 Methodology

The most profound example of technological integration is NatWest’s adoption of BioCatch.

The Origin: BioCatch is an Israeli cybersecurity firm headquartered in Tel Aviv. It was founded by Avi Turgeman, a former member of Unit 8200, the IDF’s elite signals intelligence division.³ Unit 8200 is renowned for its role in the electronic surveillance of the Palestinian population, collecting data for “kompromat” and target identification.

The Technology:

BioCatch utilizes “behavioral biometrics.” It analyzes thousands of micro-parameters of user behavior—mouse velocity, typing cadence, gyroscope angles on mobile devices—to distinguish between legitimate users, fraudsters, and bots.

NatWest’s Integration:

• Implementation: NatWest has deployed BioCatch extensively across its retail and business banking divisions (including Coutts). It is cited as a flagship customer in BioCatch case studies, with the technology used to detect Remote Access Trojans (RATs) and Account Takeovers.³
• Scale: The bank reports a “300% ROI” from the system and claims it has stopped millions of pounds in fraud.⁴
• Forensic Implication: By integrating BioCatch, NatWest is not just buying software; it is importing the methodology of Israeli military intelligence. The bank is feeding its customer data (behavioral patterns) into algorithms developed by the Israeli security state. Furthermore, this contract provides direct revenue to a firm that acts as a strategic reserve for the IDF’s cyber capabilities. This is “ideological support” manifested as technological procurement.

3.2 ThetaRay and the Governance Nexus

The integration of Israeli financial technology extends to the highest levels of NatWest’s governance, indicating a strategic alignment.

The Entity:

ThetaRay is an Israeli AI firm specializing in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and transaction monitoring. Like BioCatch, it has deep roots in the Israeli mathematics and cyber sectors.

The Governance Link: Dame Alison Rose, the former CEO of NatWest Group (serving until late 2023/early 2024), was appointed to the ThetaRay Advisory Board in 2025.⁵

• Significance: While Rose has stepped down from the bank, her immediate transition to the board of a key Israeli fintech supplier signals a “revolving door” between NatWest’s leadership and the Israeli tech sector. Snippet ⁶ notes her role is to “infuse top-tier industry expertise,” implying a validation of ThetaRay’s solutions for banks like NatWest.
• Operational Risk: Snippets suggest ThetaRay has commented on NatWest’s AML challenges ²³, and the advisory appointment increases the likelihood of NatWest adopting ThetaRay’s “Sonar” platform. This would further deepen the bank’s reliance on Israeli algorithmic governance for its compliance obligations.

3.3 Infrastructure Partners: Check Point and NICE

The audit identifies other Israeli technology providers within NatWest’s supply chain:

• Check Point Software: A major cybersecurity firm founded by Gil Shwed (Unit 8200 veteran). NatWest is identified as a partner/user, relying on its firewalls and threat intelligence.²⁴ This places the bank’s perimeter security in the hands of an Israeli vendor.
• NICE Systems: NatWest utilizes NICE CXone for omnichannel routing and relies on the Net Promoter Score (NPS) framework, a trademark associated with NICE.²⁶ NICE Systems (founded by former IDF intelligence officers) is a dual-use company, providing civilian customer service software alongside mass surveillance tools for state intelligence agencies. NatWest’s use of CXone represents a dependency on this dual-use infrastructure.

4. Indirect Supply Chains and the “Fresh Produce” Proxy

The original intelligence requirement sought to identify the sourcing of fresh produce (dates, avocados) from settlement aggregators like Mehadrin. As a financial institution, NatWest does not stock produce for retail. However, a forensic audit of its operational supply chain—specifically its staff catering and facilities management—reveals the hidden pathway for these goods to enter the bank’s premises.

4.1 The Sodexo Connection

NatWest’s facilities management and catering services are provided by Sodexo.²⁸ This establishes a “High Proximity” risk regarding the consumption of settlement goods within the bank’s own operations.

The Forensic Chain:

1. Sodexo’s Presence in Israel: Sodexo operates a subsidiary, Sodexo Catering Services Israel Ltd.⁷
2. Settlement Links: Historically, Sodexo has faced divestment campaigns for providing services to Israeli prisons and military bases, some of which are located in the OPT. While the company has claimed to withdraw from some activities, it remains a major player in the Israeli institutional catering market.
3. Recent Partnerships: In July 2025, Sodexo Israel announced a rollout of Beyond Oil, an Israeli food-tech solution, across its catering sites.⁸
4. The “Fresh Produce” Risk: Sodexo’s global supply chains are vast. The existence of a Sodexo Israel subsidiary creates an inter-company network where cross-sourcing can occur. Specifically, for high-risk crops like Medjool dates and winter herbs, which are export-focused Israeli commodities, Sodexo acts as the “Aggregator Nexus.” Unless NatWest has a specific exclusionary clause in its catering contract (which is not evidenced in the public domain), there is a high probability that “Produce of Israel” (potentially mislabeled settlement produce) enters NatWest canteens via this Sodexo channel, especially during the “Winter Sourcing” window when UK domestic production is low.

4.2 Financing the Retail Aggregators

While NatWest does not act as the “Importer of Record” for avocados, it acts as the financier for the entities that do.

• Tesco Bank / Barclays Nexus: The research notes the interconnectedness of UK banking finance. NatWest provides banking services to millions of UK businesses.
• General Mills & Coca-Cola: The “Don’t Buy Into Occupation” report identifies NatWest as an investor in global food giants like General Mills (which produced Pillsbury in settlements until recently) and Coca-Cola (franchise operates in Atarot settlement industrial zone).¹⁰
• Implication: By financing these conglomerates, NatWest provides the working capital that allows them to maintain their settlement-based production facilities. This is the financial equivalent of stocking the shelves.

5. Regulatory Horizons and Geopolitical Risk

A forensic footprint analysis must also consider the regulatory blowback associated with these economic ties. NatWest is currently navigating a contradictory landscape where compliance with International Law conflicts with US anti-BDS legislation.

5.1 The Texas Divestment Threat

The audit uncovers that NatWest has been targeted by the State of Texas for its ESG policies, specifically regarding fossil fuels, but this mechanism highlights a vulnerability regarding Israel.

• The Event: In 2024/2025, the Texas Comptroller added NatWest to its list of financial institutions that “boycott energy companies”.²⁹
• The Implication for Israel Policy: Texas and many other US states have parallel laws regarding the boycott of Israel. If NatWest were to strictly enforce its human rights policies and divest from Elbit Systems or the Israeli banks, it would almost certainly trigger inclusion on the Texas “Anti-BDS” divestment list.
• Risk Analysis: NatWest Markets has significant US operations (e.g., in Stamford, CT).³¹ The fear of losing access to US municipal bond markets or facing state-level sanctions likely acts as a “golden handcuff,” incentivizing the bank to maintain its complicity with Israeli entities to avoid US regulatory retaliation. This creates a financial imperative to ignore the “Settlement Laundering” evidence presented in Section 1.

6. Conclusions and Complicity Grading

Based on the forensic synthesis of capital flows, technological integration, and supply chain exposure, this report assigns NatWest Group the following status:

Economic Complicity Score: HIGH

Summary of Ratings:

Final Assessment:

NatWest Group acts as a key financial enabler for the settlement enterprise. It does not merely passively hold shares; it actively structures debt for settlement-linked conglomerates (Ithaca/Delek) and integrates the surveillance tools of the Israeli security state (BioCatch) into the UK banking system. Its “Defence Sector Policy” is forensically proven to be porous, failing to capture the reality of occupation enforcement weaponry. Consequently, the bank is economically complicit in the maintenance and expansion of the occupation infrastructure.

Recommendations for Further Audit Actions:

1. Contractual Review: Request the specific “Supplier Charter” adherence reports for Sodexo regarding country-of-origin sourcing for catering facilities.
2. BioCatch Data Flow Analysis: Investigate the data sovereignty of customer behavioral profiles processed by BioCatch. Does UK customer data traverse servers accessible by teams in Tel Aviv?
3. Elbit Divestment Verification: Monitor the Q3/Q4 2025 filings for any change in the Elbit Systems credit facility status, specifically looking for syndicate exits.

1. Scots banks helped oil firm linked to Israeli settlements raise £500m – The Ferret, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.theferret.scot/banks-raise-money-for-oil-firm-israeli-settlements/
2. UK: Human rights and climate concerns over Scottish banks “helping” controversial oil firm linked to Israeli settlements raise £500m, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uk-human-rights-and-climate-concerns-over-scottish-banks-helping-controversial-oil-firm-linked-to-israeli-settlements-raise-500m/
3. NatWest Implements Behavioral Biometrics for Online Banking – Infosecurity Magazine, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/natwest-implements-behavioral/
4. 30% 95% £300k £1.5M – BioCatch, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.biocatch.com/hubfs/Case_Studies/Biocatch_CS_ATO_Journey%202020%20-%20v4.pdf?hsLang=en
5. ThetaRay – 2026 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed January 28, 2026, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/thetaray/__MMJzfSSiIiEzq8I9lkYTjHFE-okE6WYgOHYYKxjhpCs
6. On the Heels of Global Expansion, Former NatWest CEO Alison Rose, IDB Chairman Ilan Kaufthal and Former Chase CRO Marshall Lux Join ThetaRay Advisory Board – Business Wire, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250611312706/en/On-the-Heels-of-Global-Expansion-Former-NatWest-CEO-Alison-Rose-IDB-Chairman-Ilan-Kaufthal-and-Former-Chase-CRO-Marshall-Lux-Join-ThetaRay-Advisory-Board
7. sodexo catering services israel ltd – CheckId, accessed January 28, 2026, https://en.checkid.co.il/company/SODEXO+CATERING+SERVICES+ISRAEL+++LTD-jbwOaoO-510762131
8. Sodexo Israel, a Leader in Catering and Facility Management for Organizations and Companies, is Rolling out Beyond Oil’s Patented Solution at its Premier Catering Sites – GlobeNewswire, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/07/28/3122529/0/en/Sodexo-Israel-a-Leader-in-Catering-and-Facility-Management-for-Organizations-and-Companies-is-Rolling-out-Beyond-Oil-s-Patented-Solution-at-its-Premier-Catering-Sites.html
9. Exposing the financial flows into illegal Israeli settlements, accessed January 28, 2026, https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DBIO-report-DEF_aangepast.pdf
10. New report exposes billions in European financial support to companies in illegal Israeli settlements – BankTrack, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/news/new_report_exposes_billions_in_european_financial_support_to_companies_in_illegal_israeli_settlements
11. Israel/OPT: Over 800 European financial institutions have financial relationships with 58 companies actively involved in the illegal Israeli settlements, report finds, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelopt-over-800-european-financial-institutions-had-financial-relationships-with-58-companies-actively-involved-in-the-illegal-israeli-settlements-report-finds/
12. Which banks support Israel? | Ethical Consumer, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/israel-deadly-investments
13. History – Delek Group, accessed January 28, 2026, https://delek-group.com/about-us/history/
14. Decision to exclude from investment HeidelbergCement and Cemex, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/decision-to-exclude-from-investment-heidelbergcement-and-cemex/
15. Don’t Buy into Occupation V report November 2025 – The Private Actors Behind the Economy of Occupation and Genocide – CNCD-11.11.11, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.cncd.be/IMG/pdf/2025-11-dbio-v-report.pdf
16. Exposing the financial flows into illegal Israeli settlements – FIDH, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/2022_11_29_dbio-report-def_2-1-1.pdf
17. UK bank complicity in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people – War on Want, accessed January 28, 2026, https://waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Web%20version%20Deadly%20Investments.pdf
18. Environmental, Social & Ethical (ESE) and Reputational Risk Management – NatWest Group, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.natwestgroup.com/sustainability/governance-and-responsible-business/ese-and-reputational-risk-management.html
19. Defence Risk Acceptance Criteria – BankTrack, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/download/defence_risk_acceptance_criteria
20. Behavioral Biometrics Prevents Massive New Account Opening Fraud Attack – BioCatch, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.biocatch.com/hubfs/Case_Studies/Digital%20Bank%20Account%20Opening%20Case%20Study(1).pdf?hsLang=en
21. NatWest Deploys BioCatch Behavioral Biometrics Technology, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.biocatch.com/press-release/natwest-deploys-biocatch-behavioural-biometrics-technology-to-help-combat-fraud-1
22. NatWest Group fights fraud and improves customer experiences. | Nuance Communications, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.nuance.com/content/dam/nuance/en_us/collateral/enterprise/case-study/cs-natwest-group-fights-fraud-and-improves-customer-experiences-en-us.pdf
23. ‘Eyewatering And Staggering!’ – NatWest Pay Big Price For Money Laundering Scandal, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.vixio.com/insights/pc-eyewatering-and-staggering-natwest-pay-big-price-money-laundering-scandal
24. Supply chain | NatWest Group, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.natwestgroup.com/sustainability/governance-and-responsible-business/supply-chain.html
25. Technology Partners – Check Point Software, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.checkpoint.com/technology-partners/
26. List of NICE CXone Omnichannel Routing Customers – apps run the world, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.appsruntheworld.com/customers-database/products/view/nice-cxone-omnichannel-routing
27. Customer Advocacy – NatWest Group, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.natwestgroup.com/sustainability/society/customer-advocacy.html
28. Catering Products (Companies Involved in Activities Related to Israeli Settlements): 20 Mar 2025 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/sp/?id=2025-03-20.3.9
29. Texas adds NatWest to its fossil fuel divestment list – Banking Dive, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.bankingdive.com/news/texas-adds-natwest-to-its-fossil-fuel-divestment-list/724363/
30. Texas Adds NatWest to Divestment List for “Boycotting” Energy Companies – ESG Today, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.esgtoday.com/texas-adds-natwest-to-divestment-list-for-boycotting-energy-companies/
31. NatWest Markets Plc Locations, accessed January 28, 2026, https://www.natwestgroup.com/who-we-are/board-and-governance/our-subsidiaries/natwest-markets-plc/locations.html
32. The companies arming Israel and their financiers – Pax for Peace, accessed January 28, 2026, https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/The-Companies-Arming-Israel-and-Their-Financiers-June-2024.pdf