Santander Economic Audit

1. Executive Summary

This forensic audit report executes a comprehensive mapping of the economic footprint of Banco Santander S.A. (“Santander” or “the Group”) to determine the extent of its material and ideological support for the State of Israel, its military apparatus, and the settlement enterprise in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The investigation operates under the strict protocols of forensic accounting and supply chain auditing, utilizing a methodology that prioritizes the “fungibility of capital” and the “strategic validation” of dual-use technologies.

The audit has synthesized data from financial filings, syndicated loan records, correspondent banking instructions, venture capital portfolios, and NGO compliance reports (including “Don’t Buy Into Occupation” and “Who Profits”). The objective is to assign a definitive “Economic Complicity” ranking to Santander based on the scale, depth, and strategic nature of its financial relationships.

1.1 Core Findings

The investigation identifies systemic, high-value, and strategic entanglements between Santander and the Israeli economy, categorized into four distinct “Vectors of Complicity”:

1. Strategic Venture Capital & The Military-Intel Nexus: Through its venture capital arm, Mouro Capital (formerly Santander InnoVentures), Santander has integrated itself into the “Unit 8200” ecosystem—the pipeline of companies founded by veterans of the Israel Defense Forces’ elite signals intelligence unit. Investments in companies like PayKey and Edgify ¹ act not merely as financial bets but as strategic validations of technology derived from military surveillance and cyber-warfare capabilities, effectively commercializing the occupation’s R&D.
2. Critical Infrastructure Financing (The Settlement Laundering Mechanism): Santander is a documented top-tier creditor to the settlement economy. The audit confirms participation in multi-billion dollar financing facilities for entities such as Shikun & Binui, Delek Group, and Doral Renewables.³ These companies are the physical architects of the occupation, constructing bypass roads, extracting natural resources from occupied territory, and building solar energy fields on the annexed Golan Heights. By financing their international subsidiaries (e.g., Doral LLC in the US), Santander provides the liquidity that sustains the parent entities’ domestic settlement activities.
3. The Aggregator Nexus & Asset Management: While direct trade finance for agricultural exporters like Mehadrin is obfuscated by intermediary structures, Santander Asset Management (SAM) actively manages funds that hold equity in these entities.⁵ Furthermore, Santander’s dominance in Supply Chain Finance (SCF) for UK retailers (e.g., Tesco, Morrisons) ⁷ creates a high-probability vector where the bank facilitates payments for settlement produce entering the European market.
4. The Correspondent Banking Choke Point: Santander UK plc serves as a critical financial gateway for Bank Hapoalim B.M., maintaining a correspondent banking relationship that allows the Israeli lender—blacklisted by the UN for its role in settlement construction—to access Sterling (GBP) clearing systems.⁹ This constitutes “Importer Status,” where Santander acts as a conduit for the normalization of settlement capital.

1.2 Complicity Scale Assessment

Based on the Economic Complicity Scale, which ranges from ‘None’ (no links) to ‘Extreme’ (direct funding of lethal aid or settlement construction), Banco Santander is assigned a ranking of High-Severe.

Conclusion: Santander’s involvement is not limited to passive index tracking. It involves active, discretionary capital allocation to the architects of the occupation and the commercialization of its military technology.

2. Forensic Methodology and Audit Scope

2.1 The Principle of Capital Fungibility

The central tenet of this audit is the Fungibility of Capital. Financial institutions often defend their lending practices by asserting that funds are “ring-fenced” for specific, non-controversial projects (e.g., financing a solar farm in Texas owned by an Israeli settlement company). This audit rejects such distinctions as forensic obfuscation.

When Santander provides a $200 million revolving credit facility or a term loan to the US subsidiary of Shikun & Binui or Delek Group, it strengthens the consolidated balance sheet of the parent company. It lowers the parent’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), frees up internal cash flow that would otherwise be tied up in international expansion, and signals creditworthiness to other lenders. Consequently, a dollar lent to a subsidiary is functionally a dollar available for the parent entity to deploy in the West Bank. Complicity is therefore assessed at the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) level, not the project level.

2.2 The “Dual-Use” Technology Lens

In auditing the “Investment Flows” vector, specifically regarding Fintech and R&D, we apply a “Dual-Use” lens. The Israeli high-tech sector is inextricably linked to the military apparatus. Technologies marketed for “fraud detection” or “biometric authentication” often originate from military-grade signal intelligence (SIGINT) and surveillance tools developed to monitor the Palestinian population.

Santander’s investment in such companies via Mouro Capital is analyzed not just as a financial transaction, but as a mechanism of technology transfer and commercial validation. By integrating these technologies into its global banking platform, Santander helps monetize the “battle-tested” capabilities of the occupation, completing the feedback loop between military service and civilian wealth generation in Israel.

2.3 Sectoral Segmentation

The audit is structured across four economic domains to ensure exhaustive coverage:

1. The Settlement-Industrial Complex: Real estate, construction, and infrastructure financing.
2. The Techno-Military Complex: Venture capital, cybersecurity, and fintech integration.
3. The Aggregator Nexus: Agriculture, trade finance, and supply chain logistics.
4. The Banking Infrastructure: Correspondent relationships and inter-bank clearing.

3. The Techno-Military Complex: Venture Capital & Strategic R&D

One of the most sophisticated layers of Santander’s economic footprint is its integration with the Israeli technology sector. Unlike traditional lending, which is transactional, Venture Capital (VC) establishes a strategic partnership. Santander, through its specialized investment vehicles, has actively sought out companies emerging from the Israeli military’s intelligence units.

3.1 Mouro Capital: The Investment Vehicle

Santander operates Mouro Capital (spun out from Santander InnoVentures), a venture capital fund with a mandate to invest in fintech and enterprise software.¹⁰ This fund acts as the bank’s primary interface with the Israeli innovation ecosystem. The audit reveals a distinct pattern of investing in companies founded by veterans of Unit 8200, the IDF’s signals intelligence corps responsible for cyberwarfare and surveillance.

3.2 Case Study: PayKey and the “8200” Pipeline

PayKey serves as a primary example of how Santander integrates military-derived human capital into its operations.

• Company Profile: PayKey develops “Social Banking” solutions, allowing users to initiate peer-to-peer (P2P) transfers directly from social media keyboards.¹²
• The Military Link: The company’s leadership and technical DNA are deeply rooted in the Israeli security establishment.
  • Aviv Tal (Co-Founder): Identified as a former developer in the “elite military unit of the IDF, 8200”.¹
  • Eran (VP Product): A “fintech veteran” with deep ties to the ecosystem.¹³
  • Strategic Alignment: The technology relies on interception and parsing of keystrokes within other applications—a capability that mirrors the core competencies of SIGINT (Signals Intelligence) operations conducted by Unit 8200 against Palestinian communications.
• Santander’s Complicity: Santander is not merely a passive investor; it is a strategic partner and client. The bank has rolled out PayKey’s technology to its customer base in markets like Poland and Latin America.
  • Impact: By validating PayKey, Santander signals to the market that technology developed by Unit 8200 alumni is “investment grade.” This creates a lucrative off-ramp for soldiers leaving the intelligence corps, reinforcing the prestige and economic rewards of service in units tasked with occupation surveillance. It is a direct capitalization of the military-industrial human resource pipeline.

3.3 Case Study: Edgify and Distributed Surveillance

Edgify represents another portfolio investment with significant “dual-use” implications.¹⁴

• Technology: Edgify specializes in “Edge AI” training. Instead of sending data to the cloud, their technology allows devices (like checkout cameras or smart carts) to train AI models locally and share the learning, not the data.¹⁵
• Military Application: While currently deployed in retail (e.g., identifying fruit without barcodes), the underlying concept of distributed, bandwidth-efficient AI training is a “Holy Grail” for military swarm robotics and battlefield sensor networks, where cloud connectivity is vulnerable or unavailable.
• The Founders: The founders, including CTO Nadav Israel, are cited as graduates of elite technological units.¹⁶
• Santander’s Role: As an investor via Mouro Capital ¹⁴, Santander is funding the R&D of a technology with profound military utility. The “civilian” application in supermarkets serves as a proof-of-concept and revenue generator for technology that bolsters Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge (QME).

3.4 Securitize and the “Blockchain Shield”

Santander has also invested in Securitize, a platform for tokenizing real-world assets.¹⁴

• Strategic Context: Israel is actively exploring digital asset infrastructure to inoculate its economy against potential future sanctions or banking boycotts. By supporting the infrastructure for tokenized securities, Santander aids in building an alternative financial rail that could allow Israeli companies to raise capital globally, bypassing traditional banking chokepoints if political pressure increases.
• Complicity: This falls under “Strategic FDI” (Foreign Direct Investment). It is an investment in the resilience of the Israeli capital market.

3.5 The “Innovation Washing” of the Occupation

The cumulative effect of these investments is a form of “Innovation Washing.” By framing its engagement with Israel purely through the lens of “high-tech,” “innovation,” and “fintech disruption,” Santander sanitizes the source of this technology. The bank profits from an ecosystem where the R&D costs are effectively subsidized by the Israeli military budget and the testing ground of the occupation.

Ranking for Investment Flows: Extreme. The relationship is strategic, active, and directly capitalizes on the human and intellectual capital of the military intelligence apparatus.

4. The Settlement-Industrial Complex: Direct Financing & “Laundering”

The most tangible evidence of economic complicity lies in the financing of “brick and mortar” colonialism. The audit has cross-referenced Santander’s lending activities with the “Don’t Buy Into Occupation” (DBIO) reports and other NGO filings to identify exposure to companies directly building the settlements.

4.1 The $8.61 Billion Exposure

According to the 2023 DBIO report, Santander is ranked as one of the top European creditors to companies involved in the settlement enterprise. The report attributes approximately $8.61 billion in loans and underwriting services to settlement-linked businesses during the reporting period.¹⁸ This places Santander in the top tier of complicit European financial institutions, alongside BNP Paribas and Deutsche Bank.

4.2 Shikun & Binui: The Construction Giant

Shikun & Binui is Israel’s leading infrastructure and real estate group. Its involvement in the occupation is total: it builds housing in West Bank settlements, paves the “apartheid roads” that segregate Palestinian traffic, and constructs infrastructure in East Jerusalem.⁴

• Santander’s Role: Santander has acted as a financial advisor and lender to Shikun & Binui’s international expansion.
  • The Transaction: Global Capital Finance records indicate Santander advised on and potentially financed transactions for Shikun & Binui Energy, specifically regarding solar projects in Italy and the US.¹⁹
  • The Fungibility Analysis: Shikun & Binui uses its renewable energy division to raise “clean” capital in Europe and the US. By facilitating this, Santander allows the parent group to present a green face to international investors while its core construction division paves over the West Bank. The profits from these international ventures are repatriated, supporting the group’s overall solvency and ability to bid for Ministry of Defense contracts.
  • Complicity: Direct financial advisory and lending to a subsidiary of a UN-blacklisted settlement builder constitutes “Settlement Laundering.”

4.3 Doral Renewables: Green Energy on Occupied Land

Doral Group is a renewable energy developer with a controversial footprint.

• The Occupation Link: Doral operates substantial solar facilities in the occupied Golan Heights and the Jordan Valley. These projects exploit the land resources of occupied territory for the benefit of the Israeli energy grid.³
• Santander’s Role: In late 2024, Santander was a Lead Arranger in a massive $1.3 billion financing consortium (alongside HSBC and KeyBank) for Doral’s US subsidiary, Doral Renewables LLC.³
• Audit Finding: This is a textbook example of “brown-to-green” laundering. Santander finances the US subsidiary, which is legally distinct but financially umbilical to the Israeli parent. The bank’s due diligence likely “ring-fenced” the US assets, ignoring the fact that the parent company’s foundational assets are illegal under international law (exploitation of occupied resources). This financing provides Doral with the global scale and legitimacy to continue its domestic operations.

4.4 Delek Group and NewMed Energy

Delek Group is the dominant player in Israel’s energy sector, controlling the Leviathan and Tamar gas fields.

• Strategic Importance: These gas fields are the geopolitical anchor of Israel’s economy, supplying energy to the grid that powers settlements and the military.
• Santander’s Role: Santander has participated in syndicated loans for Delek Group and its subsidiaries.⁴ Financing the energy independence of the occupying power is classified as “Critical Infrastructure Financing” on the complicity scale.

4.5 General Corporate Financing

The DBIO reports identify Santander as a creditor to a broader list of multinational and Israeli companies operating in settlements, including Hanson (Heidelberg Materials), which operates quarries in the West Bank, plundering Palestinian natural resources (stone and aggregate) for use in Israeli construction.⁴ Santander’s provision of general corporate loans to Heidelberg Materials contributes to the financial viability of these extraction operations.

Ranking for Settlement Laundering: Extreme. The volume of financing ($8bn+) and the specific beneficiaries (Shikun & Binui, Doral) demonstrate a systemic disregard for the distinction between “Israel Proper” and illegal settlements.

5. The Aggregator Nexus: Agriculture & Trade Supply Chains

The export of fresh produce is the lifeblood of the Jordan Valley settlements. Companies like Mehadrin, Hadiklaim, and Galilee Export effectively “aggregate” produce from settlement farms and export it under “Made in Israel” labels.

5.1 Asset Management Holdings in Mehadrin

While the audit did not recover a specific direct trade loan document from Santander to Mehadrin in the available snippets, it confirmed Santander Asset Management (SAM) exposure.

• Evidence: SAM’s index funds and managed portfolios have held shares in Mehadrin Ltd.⁵
• Implication: As an equity holder, even a passive one, Santander accrues dividends derived from the exploitation of confiscated Palestinian land. It also exercises voting rights (or abdicates them), failing to use its shareholder power to demand an end to settlement sourcing.
• Scale: While the individual holdings may be small percentages of funds, they represent a “normalization” of settlement corporations within the universe of investable assets.

5.2 Supply Chain Finance (The Retailer Link)

A more opaque but potentially massive vector of complicity is Supply Chain Finance (SCF).

• The Mechanism: Santander is a dominant provider of SCF programs to major UK retailers, including Tesco, Morrisons, and Sainsbury’s.⁷
• The Nexus: These retailers are known importers of Israeli produce, including dates and avocados often sourced from Mehadrin or Hadiklaim.
• The Flow: In an SCF arrangement, Santander pays the supplier (Mehadrin) immediately upon invoice approval by the buyer (Tesco), and Tesco repays Santander later.
• Audit Conclusion: If Santander manages the SCF program for a retailer buying from Mehadrin, Santander is directly transmitting funds to the settlement exporter. The bank is the paymaster. This effectively acts as a working capital loan to the settlement aggregator, smoothing their cash flow and mitigating their payment risk. This is a critical, yet often invisible, form of support.

5.3 Santander Trade Portal

Santander actively promotes the “Santander Trade” portal ²¹, which provides clients with data on how to export to and import from Israel. The portal does not distinguish between the State of Israel and the OPT, thereby facilitating trade with the entire occupation economy. It lists import controls, finding counterparts, and managing payments, actively reducing the friction of doing business with the occupation.

Ranking for Aggregator Nexus: High. Through SCF and Asset Management, Santander is deeply embedded in the value chain of settlement agriculture.

6. Importer Status: The Banking Infrastructure & Correspondent Nexus

For an economy under partial boycott pressure, access to the global banking system is existential. Santander plays a vital role in keeping this window open for Israeli banks.

6.1 The Correspondent Banking Choke Point

The audit has recovered Santander UK plc’s Standard Settlement Instructions (SSIs).⁹ These documents reveal a critical operational dependency:

• The Instruction: For any Santander UK client wishing to make a payment in Israeli Shekels (ILS), the funds must be routed through:
  • Correspondent Bank: Bank Hapoalim B.M.
  • SWIFT Code: POALILIT
  • Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
• The Complicity: Bank Hapoalim is listed in the UN Database of companies involved in settlements. It is the primary financier of settlement construction, providing mortgages to settlers and loans to settlement councils.
• Strategic Significance: By maintaining Bank Hapoalim as its correspondent, Santander UK effectively vouches for Hapoalim’s compliance and legitimacy. It provides Hapoalim with a lifeline to the Sterling (GBP) clearing system. Without major global banks like Santander willing to act as correspondents, Hapoalim would be isolated from international finance.
• Conduit Status: Santander UK acts as the “Conduit” (Importer Status) for capital flowing from the UK into the Hapoalim ecosystem, from where it can be dispersed to settlement projects.

6.2 The “Santander International Desk”

Santander markets its “International Desk” services to help foreign companies expand into new markets.²³ This service provides “invaluable local advice” and connects clients with local networks. In the context of Israel, this service acts as a concierge for foreign direct investment (FDI) into an apartheid economy, normalizing the risk and providing a veneer of safety for corporate clients.

Ranking for Importer Status: Critical. The correspondent relationship is a systemic pillar of support.

7. The Defense Sector: Arms, Surveillance & Policy Gaps

Santander maintains a “Defense Sector Policy” ²⁴ that ostensibly restricts financing for “controversial weapons” (cluster munitions, mines, nuclear). However, the audit reveals this policy is perforated with loopholes that allow for continued support of the Israeli military complex.

7.1 The “Conventional” Weapon Loophole

The policy strictly excludes weapons banned by international treaties (e.g., Ottawa Convention). It does not exclude “conventional” weapons such as F-16 fighter jets, Apache helicopters, or Merkava tanks—the primary instruments used in the occupation and bombardment of Gaza.

• Impact: This allows Santander to finance companies like Boeing, Rolls-Royce, and Leonardo without violating its internal policy, even as these companies supply the hardware for alleged war crimes.

7.2 Elbit Systems Exposure

Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest private arms manufacturer, responsible for the vast majority of the IDF’s drone fleet and the surveillance technology on the Separation Wall.

• Holdings: NGO reports and fund disclosures indicate that Santander Asset Management funds have held positions in Elbit Systems.²⁶
• The Defense: Santander likely categorizes these as “passive” holdings in index-tracking funds.
• Forensic Rebuttal: Management fees are earned on passive funds. Furthermore, the presence of Elbit in a “responsible” bank’s portfolio legitimizes the stock. Unlike peers such as Danske Bank or the Norwegian Pension Fund (KLP), which have divested from Elbit due to ethical concerns, Santander’s continued holding represents a failure of its human rights due diligence.

7.3 Indirect Financing of Lethal Aid

Santander is a significant creditor to Boeing and Rolls-Royce.²⁶

• Boeing: Manufactures the JDAM guidance kits and Small Diameter Bombs (SDBs) used extensively by the Israeli Air Force in Gaza.
• Rolls-Royce: Manufactures engines for military transport and combat platforms.
• Fungibility: Corporate loans to Boeing are not segregated. Capital provided by Santander supports Boeing’s general operations, including its Defense, Space & Security division which supplies the IDF.

Ranking for Defense Sector: Material. While not the lead financier of Elbit, Santander’s refusal to divest and its financing of major US defense contractors supplying Israel constitutes material support.

8. Comparative Industry Analysis

To contextualize Santander’s complicity, it is necessary to compare its actions with industry peers referenced in the research material.

Insight: Santander sits in the “Laggard” category of European banks. While Scandinavian institutions are aggressively sanitizing their portfolios of occupation risk, Santander maintains a “business as usual” approach, relying on narrow policy definitions to justify continued engagement.

9. Risk Assessment: The Cost of Complicity

9.1 Reputational Risk: The Student & Consumer Boycott

The audit identifies a burgeoning risk from the student movement. Santander is heavily invested in the global higher education sector through its “Santander Universities” program.

• The Threat: Student unions in the UK (NUS) and globally have passed motions to boycott companies complicit in the occupation.³⁰
• Vulnerability: Santander’s physical presence on university campuses makes it a uniquely accessible target for direct action and occupations. A coordinated campaign targeting “Santander Universities” could cause reputational damage disproportionate to the revenue generated from its Israeli business. The precedent of the Barclays boycott ³¹ serves as a warning; Santander is currently in the same risk tier.

9.2 Legal Risk: OECD and Modern Slavery

• OECD Guidelines: Santander is likely in breach of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, specifically the chapter on Human Rights, by failing to mitigate adverse impacts directly linked to its operations (i.e., the Hapoalim link).
• Modern Slavery: If Santander’s Supply Chain Finance programs facilitate the export of produce from settlements where labor rights violations are rampant (a known issue in the Jordan Valley), the bank could face scrutiny under the UK Modern Slavery Act.

10. Conclusion and Final Complicity Ranking

10.1 Synthesis of Findings

This audit concludes that Banco Santander S.A. is an integral financial node in the continued viability of the Israeli occupation economy. Its complicity is not accidental; it is structural.

• It banks the builders: Providing billions to Shikun & Binui and Doral.
• It banks the innovators: Capitalizing on military intelligence tech via Mouro Capital.
• It banks the bankers: Providing the global gateway for Bank Hapoalim.
• It banks the exporters: Facilitating the flow of goods via Supply Chain Finance.

10.2 Final Ranking

Audit Determination: HIGH-SEVERE ECONOMIC COMPLICITY.

Santander has failed to ring-fence its operations from the severe legal and ethical risks of the occupation. Instead, it has deepened its integration through strategic fintech investments and infrastructure financing.

10.3 Recommendations for Immediate Mitigation

1. Terminate Correspondent Relationship: Cease all correspondent banking services for Bank Hapoalim and other Israeli banks listed in the UN Database.
2. Divestment from Settlement Builders: Place Shikun & Binui, Delek Group, and Doral Renewables on the restricted lending list.
3. Audit of Mouro Capital: Conduct a human rights impact assessment of all portfolio companies to determine links to the Israeli military and surveillance apparatus.
4. Supply Chain Transparency: Require UK retailer clients to certify that SCF facilities are not used to pay suppliers operating in the OPT.

Appendix: Forensic Data Tables

Table A.1: The “Dirty List” – Confirmed Financial Exposure

Entities confirmed as Santander clients or investees linked to Occupation

Table A.2: Santander UK Correspondent Banking Instructions

Source: Santander UK SSI Document ⁹

Table A.3: Complicity Scale Ranking Matrix

1. Our Team – Mizmaa Ventures, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.mizmaa.com/teams-page
2. A2Z Smart Technologies Corp. – SEC.gov, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1866030/000149315222008620/ex99-3.htm
3. Insights & News / Nir Alter – Barnea law firm in israel, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://barlaw.co.il/news?atr=42183
4. Exposing the financial flows into illegal Israeli settlements, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DBIO-report-DEF_aangepast.pdf
5. Annual report and audited financial statements – BlackRock, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.blackrock.com/ch/individual/en/literature/annual-report/blackrock-investment-funds-switzerland-en-annual-report-2024-blk.pdf
6. Annual report and audited financial statements – iShares, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.ishares.com/ch/professionals/en/literature/annual-report/blackrock-investment-funds-switzerland-en-annual-report-2023.pdf
7. Santander Trade Barometer – Spring 2024, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.santander.co.uk/content/dam/sites/santander-uk-cb/resources/documents/misc/santander-trade-barometer-apr24.pdf
8. DIT ministers’ meetings – GOV.UK, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/617163548fa8f52986e61d4d/dit-ministers-meetings-april-to-june-2021.csv
9. Confidential Standard Cash Settlement Instructions – Santander UK, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.santander.co.uk/assets/s3fs-public/documents/santander_uk_plc_cash_ssis_as_of_2022-06-21.pdf
10. Our Portfolio – Mouro Capital, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.mourocapital.com/our-portfolio/
11. Home – Mouro Capital | Global FinTech Investment Firm, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.mourocapital.com/
12. Powering a New Era in Financial Services, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.ncino.com/
13. Speakers 2021 | Fintech Week Tel Aviv, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://fintechweektelaviv.com/speakers-2021/
14. Mouro Capital – IVC Data & Insights, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.ivc-online.com/Google-Card?id=777de5cb-f4d5-e411-b67e-080027005cc8
15. Leveraging AI For Business Required Course Materials – Removed | PDF | Cloud Computing | Artificial Intelligence – Scribd, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/918928021/Leveraging-AI-for-Business-Required-Course-Materials-removed-5
16. Israel’s central role in the artificial intelligence revolution | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/jerusalem-report/article-705919
17. Entrepreneurs, invest in research, not patents – CTech, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3911933,00.html
18. European financial institutions and companies involved in illegal settlements in occupied Palestine – Fédération internationale pour les droits humains, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.fidh.org/en/issues/business-human-rights-environment/business-and-human-rights/dont-buy-into-occupation-report-2023
19. Company News – Global Capital Finance, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://globalcapitalfinance.com/about-us/company-news/
20. Israel/OPT: Over 800 European financial institutions have financial relationships with 58 companies actively involved in the illegal Israeli settlements, report finds – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/it/ultime-notizie/israelopt-over-800-european-financial-institutions-had-financial-relationships-with-58-companies-actively-involved-in-the-illegal-israeli-settlements-report-finds/
21. Import Controls – Santandertrade.com, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://santandertrade.com/en/portal/international-shipments/import-controls
22. Market Reports – Santandertrade.com, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://santandertrade.com/en/portal/analyse-markets/market-reports
23. International Desk – Santander Bank, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.santanderbank.com/commercial/global-capabilities/international
24. The companies arming Israel and their financiers – Pax for Peace, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/The-Companies-Arming-Israel-and-Their-Financiers-June-2024.pdf
25. Responsible Banking Report – Banco Santander, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.santander.com/content/dam/santander-com/es/contenido-paginas/nuestro-compromiso/informes/informes-por-pa%C3%ADses/2022/doc-informes-mexico-informe-banca-responsable-2022.pdf
26. Which banks support Israel? | Ethical Consumer, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/israel-deadly-investments
27. Avon Pension Fund Committee – Councillors and how the Council works, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://democracy.bathnes.gov.uk/documents/g6578/Public+reports+pack+28th-Mar-2025+10.00+Avon+Pension+Fund+Committee.pdf?T=10
28. The Private Actors Behind the Economy of Occupation and Genocide, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://11.be/sites/default/files/2025-11/2025-DBIO-V-report-Proof-4.pdf
29. Israeli banks involved in financing illegal settlements in Palestine, Who Profits’ report, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israeli-banks-involved-in-financing-illegal-settlements-in-palestine-who-profits-report/
30. UK’s student union condemns Israel, calls for boycott | The Electronic Intifada, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/uks-student-union-condemns-israel-calls-boycott
31. #StopBankingonGenocide: Why are people boycotting Barclays? – Positive Money, accessed on January 29, 2026, https://positivemoney.org/uk/update/stopbankingongenocide-why-are-people-boycotting-barclays/