logo

Contents

Lloyds Banking Group Military Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 Objective and Scope

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the material and ideological complicity of Lloyds Banking Group (LBG) in the military operations of the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the broader architecture of regional militarisation. The scope of this analysis extends beyond direct transactional relationships to encompass the structural provision of capital that sustains the defense industrial base, the financing of dual-use technology supply chains, and the underwriting of infrastructure projects that reinforce the geopolitical resilience of the occupying power.

In the capacity of a Defense Logistics Analyst, the objective is to distinguish between incidental banking associations—common in a globalized financial system—and meaningful, systemic complicity. Meaningful complicity is defined here as the provision of financial services, liquidity, or equity investment that significantly enhances the operational capacity, logistical sustainability, or strategic depth of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the settlement enterprise in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

1.2 Strategic Assessment of Complicity

The audit determines that Lloyds Banking Group, through its diversified portfolio of subsidiaries—including Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets, Scottish Widows, and Lloyds Development Capital (LDC)—functions as a Tier-1 Financial Enabler of the Israeli military-industrial complex. While LBG projects an image of ethical banking through public “Defence Sector Statements” and high ESG ratings, forensic analysis reveals a bifurcated operational reality. The commercial banking arm provides multi-billion-pound liquidity to the world’s largest defense “Primes” (Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Boeing), while the private equity arm (LDC) integrates into the sub-tier supply chain of high-precision aerospace components used by Israeli firms like Elbit Systems.

Furthermore, the group’s involvement in critical infrastructure financing—specifically the Great Sea Interconnector—demonstrates a shift from tactical military support to strategic state-building, facilitating Israel’s energy integration with Europe. This moves the assessment from simple “defense contracting” to “sovereign resilience support,” a higher order of complicity that insulates the Israeli economy from regional isolation.

1.3 Classification of Support Vectors

The audit identifies four primary vectors of support, ranked by material impact:

Support Vector Classification Operational Impact Key Evidence
Direct Defense Financing Upper-Extreme Sustains production lines for F-35, F-16, Apache, and heavy artillery. Participation in >£43bn syndicated loans to BAE, Boeing, Lockheed.1
Strategic Infrastructure Severe Ends Israel’s energy isolation; integrates grids via subsea HVDC cables. Lead infrastructure lender; financing Nexans for Great Sea Interconnector.3
Tactical Supply Chain High Supplies composites/sensors to Elbit Cyclone and electronic warfare units. LDC ownership of Velocity Composites; legacy links to Ultra Electronics.5
Settlement Normalization Moderate-High Capitalizes settlement expansion (Delek) and tourism (Booking/Expedia). Underwriting £500m bonds for Ithaca (Delek); $2.5bn credit to travel giants.7

2. Forensic Accounting of Direct Defense Financing

The primary mechanism of LBG’s complicity lies in the “wholesale” provision of capital to the global defense industry. Unlike direct project finance, which targets specific infrastructure, LBG utilizes syndicated revolving credit facilities (RCFs). These instruments are critical for defense contractors because they provide the working capital necessary to manage the long lead times associated with weapons manufacturing.

2.1 The Syndicated Loan Mechanism

A syndicated loan allows a group of banks to provide a massive credit facility to a single borrower. For a company like BAE Systems or Lockheed Martin, access to a £2 billion or £5 billion RCF ensures they can purchase raw materials (titanium, composites, semiconductors), pay skilled labor, and maintain production lines years before a government payment is received.

By participating in these syndicates, Lloyds Banking Group acts as a “liquidity pump” for the entire industry. The funds are fungible; money drawn from a general corporate RCF cannot be ring-fenced to exclude specific activities like the production of white phosphorus munitions or cluster bomb components unless explicitly stated in the covenant—a rarity in general corporate purpose loans.

2.2 Analysis of Key Defense Primes

The audit has isolated LBG’s financial relationships with five key defense contractors whose equipment is central to IDF operations in Gaza and the West Bank.

2.2.1 BAE Systems: The backbone of the IAF

Relationship: Lloyds Banking Group has historically served as a principal banker to BAE Systems and has participated in syndicated loans worth approximately £43.2 billion (cumulative value of deals involving LBG).1 Operational Relevance: BAE Systems is not merely a UK supplier; it is a critical partner in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, manufacturing the aft fuselage and horizontal tails. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) relies on the F-35I “Adir” for its aerial superiority and deep-strike capabilities. Furthermore, BAE manufactures the M109 self-propelled howitzer, a staple of the IDF Artillery Corps used extensively in the bombardment of the Gaza Strip.9 Forensic Insight: LBG’s capital allows BAE to maintain the supply chain fluidity required to meet accelerated delivery schedules during conflict periods. The bank’s involvement goes beyond passive lending; as a “Mandated Lead Arranger” in many syndicates, Lloyds actively structures the debt, inviting other banks to join, thereby acting as a force multiplier for BAE’s financial stability.

2.2.2 Lockheed Martin: The F-35 and C-130 Hercules

Relationship: LBG is a documented financier of Lockheed Martin, participating in multi-billion dollar credit facilities.10 Operational Relevance: Lockheed Martin supplies the F-35 Lightning II, the C-130 Hercules transport aircraft (critical for logistical resupply), and the MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System). The F-35 is the most advanced platform in the Israeli arsenal, used for precision strikes in densely populated urban environments. Forensic Insight: The production of the F-35 is a capital-intensive global enterprise. LBG’s financing supports the UK industrial participation in this program (approx. 15% of the aircraft by value), creating a direct financial feedback loop between British banking capital and Israeli air power.

2.2.3 Boeing: Aerial Munitions and Apache Fleet

Relationship: LBG participates in syndicated loans and bond underwriting for Boeing.1 Operational Relevance: Boeing supplies the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter and the JDAM (Joint Direct Attack Munition) kits that convert “dumb” bombs into precision-guided munitions. These systems are the primary kinetic instruments used in close air support operations in Gaza.12 Forensic Insight: During the 2023-2024 offensive, the rapid expenditure of JDAMs required accelerated production. Revolving credit facilities are essential for manufacturers to ramp up production speeds (shifts, material acquisition) before supplementary government appropriations are disbursed. LBG’s credit lines thus serve as a logistical bridge for munition replenishment.

2.2.4 Raytheon (RTX): Precision Strike Capabilities

Relationship: Documented creditor and financier.10 Operational Relevance: Raytheon manufactures the “bunker buster” bombs (GBU-28) and components for the Iron Dome interceptor (in partnership with Rafael). The “bunker buster” munitions function as critical assets for targeting subterranean Hamas infrastructure but cause immense collateral damage in urban terrain.12 Forensic Insight: LBG’s continued financing of Raytheon, despite the documented use of its munitions in civilian casualty events, highlights the disconnect between the bank’s “Defense Sector Statement” and its credit risk appetite. The “general corporate purpose” clause in loan agreements effectively nullifies ethical exclusions regarding end-use.

2.3 The “Nuclear Loophole” in LBG Policy

A critical finding of this audit is the existence of a deliberate policy loophole regarding nuclear weapons. While LBG policies explicitly exclude financing for cluster munitions and landmines (which are illegal under UK law), the exclusion for nuclear weapons applies only to manufacturers involved in the nuclear programs of non-NATO states.14 Implication: This allows LBG to finance BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, and Thales—all involved in the US, UK, or French nuclear arsenals—without violating internal policy. Since these same companies are the primary suppliers of conventional arms to Israel, the “NATO exemption” effectively launders capital for the Israeli conventional war machine. Between 2021 and 2023 alone, LBG channeled £2.7 billion to nuclear weapons producers 14, capital which strengthens the overall balance sheets of these diversified defense giants.

3. Supply Chain Integration: The Role of Lloyds Development Capital (LDC)

While the commercial bank funds the “Primes,” Lloyds Development Capital (LDC)—the group’s private equity arm—operates in the mid-market, acquiring stakes in specialized engineering and manufacturing firms. This vector of complicity is often overlooked but is crucial for the Tactical Supply Chain. LDC’s portfolio includes companies that manufacture the “nuts and bolts” of modern warfare: composites, sensors, and electronic warfare components.

3.1 Velocity Composites and Elbit Systems

Entity: Velocity Composites plc. LBG Link: Velocity Composites is an LDC-backed company (LDC has historically been a major shareholder and supporter).5 Operational Nexus: Velocity Composites manufactures “structural material kits” for the aerospace industry. Crucially, the audit reveals that Elbit Systems Cyclone Ltd (an Israeli subsidiary of Elbit Systems) is a listed customer of Velocity Composites.6 Forensic Detail: Elbit Cyclone designs and manufactures composite structural components for the F-35 and various UAVs. Velocity’s provision of pre-cut material kits (plies, honeycombs) to Elbit Cyclone directly integrates LBG-backed capital into the production line of Israeli combat aircraft structures. This is a Tier-2 supply chain relationship where LBG capital optimizes the efficiency of Elbit’s manufacturing process.

3.2 Electronic Warfare and Sensor Technology

LDC has a history of investing in the high-tech defense sector, often buying and selling companies that provide niche capabilities to the IDF and NATO forces.

  • Ultra Electronics (Legacy Portfolio): LDC had significant historical involvement with Ultra, a company specializing in “undersea sensor systems” and “military and secure comms”.15 Ultra’s components are integrated into various naval and aerial platforms used by Western-aligned militaries, including Israel’s.
  • Ontic: Another LDC-linked entity that acquires “legacy” aerospace product lines.15 Ontic supports the sustainment of aging platforms. As the IDF continues to operate older F-15 and F-16 airframes, the availability of legacy spares (managed by firms like Ontic) is a matter of fleet readiness.
  • MB Aerospace: An LDC portfolio company involved in aero-engine components.16

Strategic Implication: By investing in these mid-tier suppliers, LDC seeks high returns from the “defense growth” sector. Unlike passive lending, private equity ownership involves active management—LDC appoints directors to the boards of these companies, influencing their strategic direction, including export markets. This represents active complicity in the expansion of the military supply chain.

4. The Asset Management Nexus: Scottish Widows

Scottish Widows, the insurance and pensions arm of LBG, acts as an institutional investor. The audit identifies a significant disconnect between the lending policies of Lloyds Bank (which may restrict certain defense loans) and the investment mandates of Scottish Widows.

4.1 The “Passive Investment” Shield

Scottish Widows manages billions in assets, often tracking indices or managing “pooled” funds. This structure allows LBG to claim that it does not “actively choose” to invest in controversial weapons manufacturers, but simply “tracks the market.”

Evidence of Holdings:

  • Elbit Systems: Scottish Widows has historically held shares in Elbit Systems.1 While some divestment has occurred in specific “ethical” funds, the broader portfolio often retains exposure through index trackers or external manager mandates (e.g., BlackRock-managed funds under the Scottish Widows banner).13
  • Caterpillar: The fund holds significant equity in Caterpillar Inc., the manufacturer of the D9 bulldozer used for home demolitions and combat engineering in Gaza.1
  • Raytheon & BAE: Substantial holdings in these primes are standard across Scottish Widows’ UK and Global equity funds.1

4.2 Policy Discrepancies and “Excluded Securities”

LBG’s “Defence Sector Statement” explicitly states: “Where our Insurance business invests its own funds or customer funds in assets traded in the public markets, these statements do not apply”.13 This is a critical finding. It creates a sanctioned internal bypass for defense financing. The bank can refuse a direct loan to a cluster munition manufacturer to protect its reputation, while simultaneously profiting from the dividends and share price growth of that same company via Scottish Widows. Furthermore, the “Excluded Securities” lists for Scottish Widows often focus on cluster munitions and tobacco, but fail to systematically exclude companies cited by the UN Human Rights Council for involvement in the occupation.20 The audit found no evidence of a blanket exclusion for Elbit Systems across all Scottish Widows funds for the 2024-2025 period, despite Elbit’s centrality to the alleged genocide in Gaza.10

5. Logistical Sustainment: Infrastructure and Energy Resilience

Moving beyond weapons, the audit examines LBG’s role in the strategic sustainment of the Israeli state. Modern warfare and occupation require energy security. LBG is a key financier of the infrastructure that provides this security.

5.1 The Great Sea Interconnector (EuroAsia Interconnector)

Project: A 2,000 MW High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) submarine cable connecting the electricity grids of Israel, Cyprus, and Greece.3 Strategic Value: This project ends Israel’s “energy island” status, allowing it to export natural gas-generated electricity to Europe and import power during crises (e.g., if domestic power plants are targeted by rocket fire). It is a project of supreme strategic resilience for the Israeli state.23 LBG Complicity: Lloyds Bank Infrastructure & Project Finance team is the #1 UK infrastructure lender.25 The audit confirms LBG’s financing of Nexans, the French cable manufacturer awarded the €1.43 billion contract to build the interconnector.4

  • Nexans Financing: LBG participates in the credit facilities that provide Nexans with the liquidity to execute this massive project.26
  • Direct Implications: By financing the contractor building the cable, LBG is directly facilitating the integration of Israel into the European energy grid. This reduces the geopolitical cost of the occupation by binding European energy security to Israeli stability.

5.2 Delek Group and North Sea Oil

Entity: Ithaca Energy (Subsidiary of Delek Group). Relationship: Lloyds and NatWest underwrote a £500 million bond issuance for Ithaca Energy in July 2021.7 The Settlement Link: Ithaca’s parent company, Delek Group, is on the UN database of companies involved in illegal settlements.7 Delek supplies fuel to the IDF and operates petrol stations in West Bank settlements. Financial Mechanism: Delek Group relies on dividends from its international subsidiaries (like Ithaca) to service its own debt in Israel. By underwriting Ithaca’s bonds, Lloyds facilitates the upstream flow of capital from the North Sea oil fields directly to the Delek Group treasury in Tel Aviv. This capital is then fungible, supporting Delek’s settlement activities and its contracts with the Israeli Ministry of Defense.7 This is a clear case of financial normalization, where profits from UK natural resources are channeled to sustain the occupation economy.

6. The Normalization of Occupation: Settlement Services and Tourism

The “soft” logistics of occupation involve the normalization of illegal settlements as legitimate tourist destinations and economic zones. LBG plays a crucial role here through its support of the global digital travel duopoly.

6.1 Booking Holdings and Expedia Group

Entities: Booking.com and Expedia. LBG Relationship: Lloyds Bank participates in the massive revolving credit facilities (approx. $2.5 billion each) for both Booking Holdings and Expedia Group.8 Complicity: Both companies are listed in the UN database for listing rental properties in illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank (e.g., Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim).31 By listing these properties as located in “Israel” or without warning of their illegal status, these platforms actively sustain the settlement economy, driving tourism revenue to settlers. Forensic Insight: The $2.5 billion credit facilities are the lifeblood of these tech giants, allowing them to manage cash flow and acquisitions. LBG’s participation makes it a direct beneficiary of the revenue streams generated by settlement tourism. Unlike a fixed-term loan for a specific building, these revolving facilities are engaged daily, meaning LBG is continuously providing liquidity to companies that are actively violating international law regarding the occupation.32

6.2 Correspondent Banking and Financial Flows

LBG maintains correspondent banking relationships with Israel’s major banks: Bank Leumi, Bank Hapoalim, and Mizuho Tefahot.33 Significance: These Israeli banks are the primary financiers of settlement construction. They provide the mortgages for settlers and the loans for construction companies building on Palestinian land.33 LBG Role: As a correspondent bank, LBG clears Sterling (GBP) and Euro transactions for these Israeli banks. This allows the settlement economy to interface with the UK financial system. Without these correspondent relationships, it would be significantly harder for capital to flow between the UK and the Israeli settlement enterprise. LBG effectively acts as the “gateway” to London’s financial markets for the bankers of the occupation.

7. Data Analysis and Impact Ranking

7.1 Quantitative Exposure Summary

The following table synthesizes the gathered intelligence to quantify LBG’s exposure.

Entity Role in Militarisation LBG Financial Instrument Estimated Value Exposure Impact Score (Qualitative)
BAE Systems F-35/M109 Manufacturing Syndicated Loan Participant / Banker Part of £43.2bn facility 1 Upper-Extreme
Lockheed Martin F-35/C-130 Prime Contractor Syndicated Loan / Bond Underwriting Part of £33.3bn facility 1 Upper-Extreme
Elbit Systems Drone/Surveillance Manufacturer Equity Investment (Scottish Widows) Variable (Equity Holdings) Severe
Delek Group (via Ithaca) Settlement Fuel / IDF Supply Bond Underwriter £500m Bond 7 High
Nexans Strategic Infrastructure (Interconnector) Corporate Credit Facility Part of €1.43bn contract financing 26 High
Velocity Composites Tactical Supply (Elbit Cyclone) Private Equity Support (LDC) Equity / Strategic Guidance Moderate-High
Caterpillar D9 Bulldozer Supply Equity Investment / Loan Syndicate £99m (historical estimate) 1 Severe

7.2 Qualitative Complicity Assessment

Based on the Impact Scale (None to Upper-Extreme), Lloyds Banking Group is assessed as having Upper-Extreme complicity. This is driven not by a single transaction, but by the breadth of its involvement across the entire lifecycle of militarisation:

  1. R&D Phase: Financing the Primes (Lockheed/BAE) during the development of systems like the F-35.
  2. Production Phase: Supplying Tier-2 manufacturers (Velocity Composites) with capital to build components.
  3. Procurement Phase: Providing liquidity to the Israeli Ministry of Defense’s suppliers (Elbit, Caterpillar).
  4. Sustainment Phase: Financing the infrastructure (Energy Interconnector) and economic normalization (Booking.com/Delek) that makes the occupation viable long-term.

  1. UK bank complicity in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people – War on Want, accessed February 3, 2026, https://waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Web%20version%20Deadly%20Investments.pdf
  2. Banking on Bloodshed – War on Want, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Banking%20on%20Bloodshed.pdf
  3. Great Sea Interconnector – Wikipedia, accessed February 3, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Sea_Interconnector
  4. Nexans wins record-breaking contract for the Great Sea Interconnector, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.nexans.com/press-releases/nexans-wins-record-breaking-contract-for-the-euroasia-interconnector/
  5. Placing and Admission to AIM – P nganicalP simddAn oAntoiss MIA – Velocity Composites, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.velocity-composites.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/20170515_Admission_document.pdf
  6. index – Airframer, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.airframer.com/pdf_cats/airframer_cat4.pdf
  7. Scots banks helped oil firm linked to Israeli settlements raise £500m – The Ferret, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.theferret.scot/banks-raise-money-for-oil-firm-israeli-settlements/
  8. EXPEDIA GROUP, INC., accessed February 3, 2026, https://s202.q4cdn.com/757635260/files/doc_financials/2025/q3/6e8771b6-f5a3-4617-a230-56e489b546f0.pdf
  9. The Private Actors Behind the Economy of Occupation and Genocide, accessed February 3, 2026, https://11.be/sites/default/files/2025-11/2025-DBIO-V-report-Proof-4.pdf
  10. Which banks support Israel? | Ethical Consumer, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/israel-deadly-investments
  11. High-risk arms trade and the financial sector – Pax voor Vrede, accessed February 3, 2026, https://paxvoorvrede.nl/wp-content/uploads/import/2022-07/PAX_REPORT_HIGHRISK_ARMS_TRADE.pdf
  12. New report: HSBC a ‘crucial link in the chain’ of Palestinian oppression says War on Want, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/news/new_report_hsbc_a_crucial_link_in_the_chain_of_palestinian_oppression_says_war_on_want
  13. Lloyds Banking Group Defence Sector Statement – February 2025, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/sustainability/codes-and-policies/2025/2025-lbg-defence-sector-statement.pdf
  14. 6.2 Lloyds Banking Group (Bank of Scotland), accessed February 3, 2026, https://nukedivestmentscotland.org/lloyds-banking-group/
  15. Aerospace, Defence, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions – Europe (January 1993 – April 2022) – Renaissance Strategic Advisors, accessed February 3, 2026, https://rsadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/RSAdvsiors_AD_Europe_MA_Map_Infographic_2022.pdf
  16. LLOYDS BANKING GROUP plc – SEC.gov, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1160106/000093041320000534/c95250_20f.htm
  17. The companies arming Israel and their financiers – Pax for Peace, accessed February 3, 2026, https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/The-Companies-Arming-Israel-and-Their-Financiers-June-2024.pdf
  18. 2025 Semi-Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information (Unaudited) – BlackRock, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.blackrock.com/cl/literature/semi-annual-financial-statements/safs-ishares-msci-eafe-other-etfs-01-31-en.pdf
  19. Goldman Sachs Funds, accessed February 3, 2026, https://am.gs.com/public-assets/documents/b66effc6-a6af-11ef-98a3-8bbe63bcca49?view=true
  20. Home REIT plc, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.homereituk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Home-Reit_Annual-Report-2023.pdf
  21. A Critical Analysis of Investor Action on Health – University of Nottingham, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/documents/chill/nubs-investor-action-on-health-final-report-april-2025.pdf
  22. Elbit Systems: war criminals and genocidaires face financial woes | BDS Movement, accessed February 3, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/elbit-systems-war-criminals-and-genocidaires-face-financial-woes
  23. Supercharged: The EuroAsia Interconnector and Israel’s Pursuit of Energy Interdependence Gabriel Mitchell, accessed February 3, 2026, https://mitvim.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Gabriel-Mitchell-The-EuroAsia-Interconnector-and-Israels-Pursuit-of-Energy-Interdependence-February-2021.pdf
  24. The Great Sea Interconnector: Prospects for an Electrical Cable Connecting Greece, Cyprus, and Israel – Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, accessed February 3, 2026, https://besacenter.org/the-great-sea-interconnector-prospects-for-an-electrical-cable-connecting-greece-cyprus-and-israel/
  25. Infrastructure & Project Finance – Lloyds Bank, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/corporate-banking/specialist-teams/sponsors-debt-and-structured-finance/infrastructure-and-project-finance.html
  26. Universal registration document – Nexans, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.nexans.com/app/uploads/2025/04/urd-2024-en-v3.pdf
  27. UK: Human rights and climate concerns over Scottish banks “helping” controversial oil firm linked to Israeli settlements raise £500m, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uk-human-rights-and-climate-concerns-over-scottish-banks-helping-controversial-oil-firm-linked-to-israeli-settlements-raise-500m/
  28. Expedia Group, Inc.’s $2.5 Billion Revolving Credit Facility | Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.cravath.com/news-insights/expedia-group-incs-dollar25-billion-revolving-credit-facility.html
  29. expe-20240331 – SEC.gov, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1324424/000132442424000026/expe-20240331.htm
  30. bkng-20241231 – SEC.gov, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1075531/000107553125000010/bkng-20241231.htm
  31. Annex 1: Company list, accessed February 3, 2026, https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024_DBIO-IV_Company-list.pdf
  32. New international joint campaign to stop foreign complicity in Israel’s illegal settlement project: Stop Trade with Settlements – Oxfam, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/new-international-joint-campaign-stop-foreign-complicity-israels-illegal-settlement
  33. Financial Institutions Group (FIG) – Bank Hapoalim, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.bankhapoalim.com/en/financial-institutions-group
  34. Israel – U.S. Banks and Local Correspondent Banks – International Trade Administration, accessed February 3, 2026, https://trade.my.site.com/article?id=Israel-US-banks

 

Related News & Articles