logo

Contents

AT&T Military Audit

STRATEGIC AUDIT FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY

1.1 Objective of the Forensic Audit

This report, commissioned under the operational purview of a Defense Logistics Analyst, executes a comprehensive forensic audit of AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) to quantify its systemic integration into the Israeli military-industrial complex and the occupation infrastructure of the Palestinian territories. The primary objective is to transcend the superficial analysis of standard commercial relationships and expose the deep-layer logistical, technological, and financial dependencies that bind one of the world’s largest telecommunications conglomerates to the operational continuity of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).

The scope of this audit is rigorous and forensic. It moves beyond identifying mere vendor-client relationships to mapping the bi-directional flow of capital, dual-use technology, and human intelligence assets. The ultimate deliverable is a definitive ranking on a standardized Military Complicity Scale, enabling defense policymakers and ethical compliance officers to assess the risk of “entanglement”—a state where corporate operations become indistinguishable from the military objectives of a foreign power.

1.2 The Logistics Analyst Perspective

From a logistics standpoint, modern warfare is not solely defined by kinetic weaponry—tanks, missiles, and artillery. It is defined by the “Kill Chain,” a cycle of identification, tracking, targeting, and engagement that relies entirely on secure, high-latency telecommunications, cloud computing, and algorithmic processing. In this context, a telecommunications provider like AT&T is not a neutral utility; it is a provider of the “digital nervous system” that enables the kinetic arm of the military to function.

Our analysis focuses on four critical logistical pillars:

  1. Direct Logistical Sustainment: The physical maintenance of military installations (e.g., Site 512) and diplomatic outposts that legitimize territorial claims (e.g., US Embassy Jerusalem).
  2. Technological Supply Chain Integration: The incorporation of Israeli military-grade software (DriveNets, Amdocs) into the core architecture of the US telecommunications grid, creating a strategic dependency that ensures perpetual revenue streams for the Israeli Defense Industrial Base (DIB).
  3. Human Capital Fusion: The “Revolving Door” phenomenon where AT&T’s R&D centers in Israel serve as employment hubs for veterans of Unit 8200 and the C4I Directorate, effectively subsidizing the retention of Israel’s cyber-warfare talent pool.
  4. Territorial Legitimacy and Infrastructure: The provision of roaming and connectivity services that normalize and economically sustain illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

1.3 The Complicity Scale Definition

To provide a quantifiable output, this audit utilizes a graduated Military Complicity Scale (MCS) ranging from Level 1 to Level 5.

Level Designation Operational Definition
1 Neutral No material interaction with conflict actors; strict neutrality in procurement and service provision.
2 Incidental Standard commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) goods sold via third parties with no direct relationship or customization.
3 Direct Support Direct contracting for non-lethal services; supply chain visibility; awareness of end-use in conflict zones.
4 Integrated Partner Strategic partnerships; joint development of dual-use technology; infrastructure sustainment; significant financial investment in the DIB; structural dependency.
5 Critical Enabler Provider of lethal aid components or essential operational systems without which military operations would face immediate degradation or cessation.

This report will demonstrate that AT&T currently operates firmly within Level 4 (Integrated Partner), with specific technological trajectories pushing it toward Level 5.

2. DIRECT CONTRACTING: THE PHYSICAL AND DIPLOMATIC FOOTPRINT

The most visible, yet often overlooked, aspect of AT&T’s complicity lies in its direct contractual obligations to facilities that are central to the US-Israel security architecture and the diplomatic legitimization of Israeli territorial claims.

2.1 Site 512: Sustaining the “Eyes” of the Missile Defense Shield

Forensic review of recent US Army procurement data identifies a critical nexus between AT&T and Site 512 (also designated as the “Cooperative Security Location”). Located atop Mt. Keren in the Negev Desert, Site 512 is frequently mischaracterized as a mere storage facility. In reality, it is a sophisticated radar base housing the AN/TPY-2 X-Band Radar, a system designed to detect and track long-range ballistic missile threats.1

2.1.1 Operational Relevance of Site 512

The AN/TPY-2 radar is the sensory core of the region’s integrated air defense system (IADS). It feeds targeting data directly to the Israeli Arrow and David’s Sling missile defense systems, as well as the Iron Dome batteries manufactured by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.3 Without the high-fidelity tracking data provided by Site 512, the efficacy of Israel’s interception capabilities against threats from Iran, Hezbollah, or long-range projectiles from Yemen would be significantly degraded.

2.1.2 AT&T’s Contractual Scope

Procurement records from November 2024 explicitly list AT&T as the vendor for “Site 512 Facility and Maintenance Services” under a Purchase Order (PO) issued by the US Army’s 408th Contracting Support Brigade.1 A secondary contract for “AT&T Cellular & M” (Maintenance) suggests the provision of secure mobile communications and potentially data backhaul services for the facility.2

The implications of “Facility and Maintenance Services” in a classified radar environment are profound. This is not merely about providing civilian internet access. High-frequency X-Band radars require immense data throughput capabilities to transmit tracking telemetry in real-time to fire control centers (both US and Israeli). If AT&T is maintaining the fiber optic backbones or the secure communications infrastructure that links Site 512 to the broader IADS network, the company is directly integrated into the “Kill Chain.” The failure of these services would result in a “blind spot” in Israel’s aerial defense, making AT&T a guarantor of the system’s operational readiness.

Forensic Insight: The contract value—listed in the range of $1 million to $5 million for a short duration—indicates a specialized, high-value service rather than generic utility provision. The timing, amid heightened regional tensions in late 2024 and 2025, underscores the criticality of this support. AT&T is effectively acting as a logistical subcontractor for the Israeli missile defense umbrella, shielding the state from the kinetic consequences of regional hostilities.1

2.2 The US Embassy Jerusalem: Infrastructure of Legitimation

Following the 2018 relocation of the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem—a move that unilaterally recognized Israeli sovereignty over the contested city and broke with international consensus—the logistical sustainment of this facility became a political act.

2.2.1 Telecommunications as Political Validation

Procurement documents confirm that AT&T Enterprises holds substantial obligations (projected at $53.5 million for 2025 across Department of State contracts) that include the servicing of the US Embassy in Jerusalem.4 Additionally, the company services the “Tel Aviv Branch Office”.5

By providing the telecommunications infrastructure for the Jerusalem Embassy, AT&T facilitates the diplomatic normalization of Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem. The infrastructure required for a US Embassy is immense: secure lines, redundant fiber connections, and satellite uplinks. Installing and maintaining this infrastructure requires deep coordination with Israeli municipal authorities and state-owned utilities, effectively integrating AT&T into the “settlement” of Jerusalem.

Legal and Ethical Risk: International law considers East Jerusalem occupied territory. Corporate actors that facilitate the transfer of diplomatic missions to occupied territory contribute to the violation of the status quo ante. AT&T’s contracts here are not neutral; they are the digital mortar cementing the US recognition of exclusive Israeli sovereignty over the city.4

3. THE SUPPLY CHAIN FUSION: DRIVENETS AND THE “SILICON SHIELD”

Perhaps the most significant finding of this forensic audit is the structural fusion of AT&T’s core network architecture with DriveNets, an Israeli company whose DNA is inextricably linked to the IDF’s elite cyber-intelligence unit, Unit 8200. This relationship transcends a vendor-client arrangement; it represents a strategic dependency that creates a “Silicon Shield” for the Israeli defense sector.

3.1 The DriveNets Dependency: Outsourcing the Network Brain

AT&T has aggressively migrated its network core to a “disaggregated” model, separating software from hardware to increase flexibility and reduce costs. The partner chosen for this transformation is DriveNets.

3.1.1 Quantitative Dependency

As of January 2023, AT&T publicly acknowledged that DriveNets Network Cloud software carries more than 52% of its core production traffic in North America.7 This figure has likely increased as AT&T continues its fiber and 5G expansion.

Forensic Implication: A majority of the data flowing through the AT&T network—including US government communications, FirstNet public safety traffic, and financial data—is routed and managed by software developed in Ra’anana, Israel. If DriveNets were to withdraw support or if the software contained a latent vulnerability, over half of AT&T’s network capacity would be compromised. This constitutes a Level 5 dependency risk, effectively making the operational continuity of US telecommunications contingent on the stability of an Israeli firm.

3.1.2 Capital Injection and the “Exit” Economy

In mid-2025, AT&T participated in a massive $650 million secondary investment round for DriveNets.8 This transaction was not a direct investment in R&D but a purchase of shares from employees and early investors.

Logistical Analysis of Capital Flow:

  1. Direct Wealth Transfer: This investment transferred hundreds of millions of dollars directly into the personal accounts of DriveNets founders, employees, and Israeli VC funds (like Pitango).9
  2. Sustaining the Ecosystem: These beneficiaries are largely veterans of Unit 8200 and other IDF technology directorates. The influx of capital allows them to reinvest in new startups, purchase real estate, and pay taxes in Israel, thereby financially sustaining the “Start-Up Nation” economy during a period of war when foreign direct investment (FDI) might otherwise falter.
  3. Validation for Export: AT&T’s validation of DriveNets technology serves as a global “stamp of approval,” enabling DriveNets to secure contracts with other major carriers like KDDI (Japan) and Comcast.11 This expands the market share of the Israeli DIB, increasing its resilience against economic boycotts.

3.2 The Unit 8200 Connection: Origins of the Technology

The founders of DriveNets, Ido Susan and Hillel Kobrinsky, are paradigmatic figures of the Israeli military-tech pipeline. Ido Susan is a “self-taught engineer” who served in the IDF’s intelligence unit, leveraging skills honed in military SIGINT (Signals Intelligence) to build commercial networks.12 Hillel Kobrinsky is a veteran entrepreneur.

The technology itself—the Disaggregated Distributed Chassis (DDC)—mirrors the architectural shifts within the IDF’s C4I Directorate, which prioritizes decentralized, cloud-native command structures to ensure survivability under fire. By adopting this architecture, AT&T is effectively importing the IDF’s network doctrine into US civilian infrastructure. The “dual-use” nature of this technology is undeniable; the same routing algorithms that manage Netflix traffic for AT&T can be used to manage drone swarm telemetry for the IDF.13

3.3 Strategic Vulnerability and Governance

AT&T’s reliance on DriveNets introduces a unique governance risk. DriveNets is listed in databases of defense suppliers and has received validation from the Israeli Ministry of Defense for its technological contributions.15 The company’s headquarters in Ra’anana places it within the jurisdiction of Israeli security laws, which could theoretically compel the company to assist state intelligence services. While no direct evidence of such compulsion exists in the public domain, the capability and jurisdictional authority exist, creating a latent risk for AT&T’s diverse customer base.17

4. THE BILLING AND INTELLIGENCE NEXUS: AMDOCS

If DriveNets represents the future of AT&T’s complicity, Amdocs represents its historical foundation. Amdocs provides the billing and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems for approximately 90% of US telecommunications carriers, with AT&T being its flagship client.18

4.1 The Governance Link: IMOD and Rafael

A forensic examination of Amdocs’ board of directors reveals overlapping directorates that link the company directly to the Israeli defense establishment.

Key Person of Interest: Dr. Giora Yaron

Dr. Yaron, a long-serving member of the Amdocs Board of Directors, simultaneously holds positions on:

  • The Advisory Board of Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd., the state-owned manufacturer of the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Spike missiles.20
  • The Advisory Board of the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).20

Forensic Implication: This is a clear conflict of interest and a vector for strategic alignment. A director with a fiduciary duty to AT&T’s primary billing vendor also advises the manufacturer of Israel’s missile defense systems and the ministry responsible for the occupation. This ensures that Amdocs’ corporate strategy remains aligned with the state’s national security interests. It raises the possibility that revenues derived from AT&T contracts are viewed strategically by the IMOD as a means to sustain the broader Israeli tech sector.

4.2 The Intelligence Risk: Call Detail Records (CDRs)

Billing systems are intelligence goldmines. They generate Call Detail Records (CDRs), which contain metadata: who called whom, when, for how long, and from what location. In the world of intelligence, metadata is often more valuable than the content of the call itself, as it maps social networks and command hierarchies.19

Historical Espionage Allegations: While Amdocs aggressively denies involvement in espionage, the company has been the subject of US federal investigations (reported by Fox News in 2001 and subsequent analyses) regarding the potential for “backdoors” in its billing software that could allow Israeli intelligence to monitor US communications.18

Regardless of the veracity of historical claims, the logistical reality remains: AT&T outsources the management of its most sensitive customer data to a firm whose senior leadership advises the Israeli military. The maintenance and updating of these systems often occur from Amdocs’ massive campus in Ra’anana, meaning US data management is operationally dependent on a workforce subject to IDF reserve duty and Israeli security protocols.25

4.3 Economic Sustainment of the “Billing Capital”

Amdocs is the largest private employer in Ra’anana and one of the largest in the Israeli tech sector. AT&T’s contracts, worth billions over decades, effectively bankroll this employment base. The taxes paid by Amdocs and its employees directly fund the Israeli state budget, of which nearly 20% is allocated to defense. Therefore, every AT&T bill paid contributes a fractional percentage to the procurement of munitions used in Gaza and the West Bank.18

5. DUAL-USE TECHNOLOGY AND THE R&D PIPELINE

AT&T operates a massive Israel R&D Center and the AT&T Foundry (in partnership with Amdocs), employing roughly 500 engineers.27 This facility is not merely a satellite office; it is a core engine of AT&T’s global innovation strategy.

5.1 The “Revolving Door” of Human Capital

The R&D center’s workforce is drawn heavily from the IDF’s technology units. During the conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon (2023-2025), significant portions of this workforce were called up for reserve duty.

Corporate Policy as War Support: AT&T’s HR policies in Israel are designed to support this mobilization. The company ensures “business continuity” while employees serve in the IDF, effectively subsidizing the war effort by keeping jobs open and maintaining benefits for soldiers actively deployed in combat zones.29 This creates a moral and financial complicity where AT&T acts as a safety net for the IDF’s reserve component.

5.2 5G and Edge AI: The Digital Battlefield

The technologies developed at the AT&T Israel R&D center—specifically 5G protocols and Edge AI—are inherently dual-use.

  • 5G Latency: The low-latency 5G networks optimized in Ra’anana are essential for autonomous vehicles and smart cities. However, the IDF uses identical low-latency architectures for drone swarm coordination and loitering munitions piloting.30
  • Edge Computing: Processing data at the “edge” (on the device) is critical for AT&T’s consumer apps. For the IDF, it is critical for missile guidance systems that cannot rely on cloud connectivity in a jammed electronic warfare environment. By funding this research in Israel, AT&T contributes to the foundational knowledge base of the Israeli defense sector.

5.3 The Startup Scouting Network

The AT&T Foundry actively scouts Israeli startups for acquisition or partnership. This provides a lucrative “exit strategy” for technologies developed by military veterans.

5.3.1 Armis Security and the ServiceNow Deal

Armis Security, an asset visibility company founded by Unit 8200 alumni Yevgeny Dibrov and Nadir Izrael, was heavily supported by AT&T and integrated into AT&T Cybersecurity services.32 In late 2024/early 2025, Armis became the target of a $7.75 billion acquisition by ServiceNow.34

The Mechanism of Complicity:

  1. Incubation: AT&T identifies a promising Israeli defense-tech startup (Armis).
  2. Integration: AT&T integrates the tech into its global offerings, validating it and generating revenue.
  3. Valuation: The startup’s value explodes due to this Tier-1 validation.
  4. Exit: The startup is sold for billions, enriching the founders (Unit 8200 vets) and investors, who then reinvest in the next generation of military-derived tech.

AT&T acts as the “kingmaker” in this cycle, turning military-grade cyber tools into global enterprise software assets.

6. THE MILITARIZATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY: FIRSTNET AND “SMART CITIES”

AT&T is the private partner for FirstNet, the US government’s nationwide public safety broadband network. While nominally a domestic US project, FirstNet has become a vector for the importation of Israeli security doctrines and surveillance technologies.

6.1 FirstNet International Cooperation

The FirstNet Authority actively engages in “knowledge exchange” with international counterparts, including the Israeli Ministry of Public Security and the Israeli Police. These exchanges focus on “public safety broadband” and emergency response.35

Risk of Doctrine Transfer: Israel’s “public safety” methodologies are often developed in the context of controlling the Palestinian population in the occupied territories—using surveillance, biometrics, and predictive policing to suppress dissent. By collaborating with Israeli counterparts, FirstNet risks importing these “occupation-style” policing tactics into the US domestic sphere. The “Start-Up Nation” markets its crowd control and surveillance tech as “field-tested,” a euphemism for its use on Palestinian civilians.36

6.2 Carbyne: The 911 Surveillance Tool

A critical piece of this puzzle is Carbyne (formerly Reporty), an emergency response platform backed by AT&T Ventures and formerly chaired by Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM and Defense Minister).

The Tech: Carbyne allows 911 dispatchers to access the camera and microphone of a caller’s smartphone, as well as precise geolocation data, often without requiring an app installation.37 The Complicity: This technology is a direct derivative of Israeli intelligence capabilities. By integrating Carbyne into US emergency services via the AT&T network, the company is normalizing invasive surveillance capabilities that blur the line between public safety and state espionage. The connection to Ehud Barak and Unit 8200 suggests that the company maintains deep ties to the Israeli security establishment, raising data privacy concerns for US citizens and demonstrating AT&T’s willingness to monetize military-grade surveillance tools.

6.3 Smart Cities and “Safe City” Convergence

AT&T’s “Smart City” initiatives utilize IoT (Internet of Things) sensors, cameras, and data analytics to manage urban environments.38 Much of this technology is sourced from or co-developed with Israeli firms that pioneered “Safe City” projects in East Jerusalem (e.g., the Mabat 2000 surveillance system). The logic of the “Smart City” in the Israeli context is often one of control and enclosure; AT&T’s adoption of these technologies facilitates the global proliferation of the “occupation laboratory” model.

7. TERRITORIAL COMPLICITY: SETTLEMENTS AND ROAMING

Beyond technology and contracting, AT&T is complicit in the physical infrastructure of the occupation through its service agreements.

7.1 Roaming Agreements on Stolen Land

AT&T maintains standard international roaming agreements with Israel’s primary cellular carriers: Partner (formerly Orange Israel), Cellcom, and Pelephone.40

Forensic Analysis of Infrastructure: These Israeli carriers operate hundreds of cellular towers and antennas in the West Bank (Area C) and occupied East Jerusalem. These towers are often constructed on private Palestinian land confiscated by the military. They provide 4G/5G services to illegal settlements while Palestinian providers are often restricted to 3G by Israeli military orders.41

AT&T’s Role:

When an AT&T customer (a tourist, a diplomat, or a FirstNet user) travels to the West Bank and their phone connects to a “Cellcom” or “Partner” tower in the settlement of Ariel or Ma’ale Adumim, AT&T pays a roaming fee to that Israeli carrier. This revenue stream directly subsidizes the maintenance of infrastructure that violates international law (Geneva Convention IV). AT&T creates a seamless digital experience that erases the Green Line, treating the illegal settlements as an integral part of the State of Israel.

7.2 Corporate Anti-BDS Alignment

In the US domestic sphere, AT&T has aligned itself with anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) legislation to protect its state government contracts. Many US states require contractors to certify they do not boycott Israel. AT&T’s compliance with these laws goes beyond mere legal adherence; the company has proactively petitioned the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to exclude shareholder proposals that demand transparency regarding human rights violations in conflict zones.43 By suppressing shareholder democracy on this issue, AT&T shields the Israeli occupation from corporate scrutiny.

8. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND IDEOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT

The alignment between AT&T and the Israeli state is reinforced by a corporate culture that encourages identification with the Israeli military cause.

8.1 Friends of the IDF (FIDF) Sponsorship

There is a documented pattern of AT&T executives and corporate structures supporting the Friends of the IDF (FIDF), a US non-profit that raises funds for Israeli soldiers.

  • Executive Missions: High-ranking AT&T executives/alumni (e.g., Bruce Gordon) have participated in FIDF missions to Israel, meeting with IDF command staff and visiting bases.44
  • Institutional Validations: Corporate matching programs often include FIDF as an eligible charity, allowing tax-deductible US dollars to flow to a foreign military force. This social validation of the IDF within the corporate suite normalizes the military’s actions and creates a culture where criticism of the occupation is viewed as “anti-corporate”.46

8.2 The “Start-Up Nation” Narrative

AT&T executives frequently cite the “Start-Up Nation” narrative to justify their deep investment in Israel. However, this narrative is a sanitization of the military-industrial reality. The “innovation” AT&T seeks is almost exclusively derived from the military sector. By promoting this narrative, AT&T provides cover for the militarized nature of the Israeli economy, framing deep military integration as benign technological progress.28

9. FORENSIC DETERMINATION: COMPLICITY SCORING

Based on the exhaustive evidence presented above, we apply the Military Complicity Scale to AT&T Inc.

9.1 The Scorecard

Complicity Vector Findings Summary Risk Level
Direct Contracting Maintenance of Site 512 (Radar) & US Embassy Jerusalem; Logistical support for missile defense. High (Level 4)
Supply Chain 52% Core Traffic on DriveNets (Unit 8200 origin); Billing on Amdocs (IMOD Board ties); $650M capital injection. Critical (Level 5)
Dual-Use Tech R&D Center developing 5G/Edge AI for drone applications; FirstNet/Carbyne surveillance integration. High (Level 4)
Territorial Roaming on settlement infrastructure; Anti-BDS lobbying; Diplomatic legitimization via Embassy services. Medium (Level 3)
Governance Board interlocks (Amdocs/Rafael); FIDF sponsorship; “Business Continuity” for IDF reservists. High (Level 4)

9.2 Final Classification: LEVEL 4 (INTEGRATED PARTNER)

Justification:

AT&T is classified as an Integrated Partner (Level 4). It is not merely a vendor; it is a structural component of the Israeli technological and logistical ecosystem.

  • The reliance on DriveNets creates a dependency so deep that it borders on Level 5 (Critical Enabler), as the removal of this software would cripple AT&T’s own network.
  • The Site 512 contract proves direct logistical involvement in the “kill chain” of missile defense.
  • The Amdocs relationship provides the IMOD with a strategic foothold in US telecommunications data management.

9.3 Future Outlook & Escalation Risk

The audit identifies a high probability of AT&T escalating to Level 5 in the near future due to:

  1. AI Warfare Integration: As AT&T integrates more AI-driven network defense tools (like Armis or future DriveNets iterations), it will be utilizing autonomous algorithms developed for cyber-warfare, effectively merging civilian and military digital domains.
  2. Infrastructure Fusion: The convergence of FirstNet and “Smart City” surveillance with Israeli “Safe City” tech will make AT&T a primary vector for the domestic application of occupation-style policing in the US.
  3. Capital Deepening: Continued large-scale investments (like the $650M in DriveNets) signal a strategic intent to bankroll the Israeli DIB as a core supplier, regardless of geopolitical fallout.

 

  1. FY 25 ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (AMC) ACQUSITION FORECAST December 2024, accessed February 1, 2026, https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2025/01/14/9faacbeb/copy-of-enclosure-1-fy25-amc-acquisition-forecast-december-2024-master.pdf
  2. amc-fy25.pdf – Army.mil, accessed February 1, 2026, https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2025/01/14/f3132ccd/amc-fy25.pdf
  3. Israel MOD Signs Multi-Billion Dollar Contract with Rafael to Expand Serial Production of Iron Dome System, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.rafael.co.il/news/israel-ministry-of-defense-spokespersons-statement-2/
  4. Lexmark Printers Justification and Award Notice, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.highergov.com/contract-opportunity/lexmark-printers-justification-and-award-notice-19aqmm21f4625-u-43258/
  5. 2023 Investment Climate Statements: Ireland – State Department, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.state.gov/page/174/?post_type=state_report
  6. ‘Oh… the election…!’ – The Jewish World, accessed February 1, 2026, https://jewishworldnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Jw-v-9finale.pdf
  7. DriveNets Network Cloud Now Carries More Than 52% of AT&T’s Core Production Traffic, accessed February 1, 2026, https://drivenets.com/news-and-events/press-release/drivenets-network-cloud-now-carries-more-than-52-of-atts-core-production-traffic/
  8. AT&T buys 15% stake in DriveNets | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/article-869943
  9. AT&T buys $650M stake in DriveNets, delivering major payout to founders, employees and early backers | CTech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/gg7x4za3q
  10. AT&T buys $650m in shares from Israeli software firm DriveNets – Tech in Asia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.techinasia.com/news/att-buys-650m-shares-israeli-software-firm-drivenets
  11. KDDI and Israel’s DriveNets sign strategic deal to modernize telecom backbone | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/r1aeriywxe
  12. A One-on-One Interview with DriveNets CEO Ido Susan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://drivenets.com/blog/one-on-one-with-drivenets-ceo-ido-susan/
  13. About DriveNets Innovative Approach to Networking, accessed February 1, 2026, https://drivenets.com/company/
  14. Disaggregation – Driving the Future of AT&T’s IP Transport-Today – DriveNets, accessed February 1, 2026, https://drivenets.com/blog/disaggregation-is-driving-the-future-of-atts-ip-transport-today/
  15. Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 92/Thursday, May 12, 2022/Notices – GovInfo, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-05-12/pdf/2022-10215.pdf
  16. Private 5G/4G Cellular Networks for Defense – SNS Telecom & IT, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.snstelecom.com/defense
  17. Israeli unicorn start-up DriveNets raises $208 million in funding | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/israeli-unicorn-start-up-drivenets-raises-208-million-in-funding-657393
  18. How Americans are blackmailed by Israel – Arab News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.arabnews.com/node/218760
  19. Amdocs Lt Amdocs Ltd. – COAT, accessed February 1, 2026, http://coat.ncf.ca/P4C/66/5-6.pdf
  20. AMDOCS LIMITED, accessed February 1, 2026, https://investors.amdocs.com/static-files/79314ffd-0361-4b88-b332-7e63847380c4
  21. AMDOCS LIMITED, accessed February 1, 2026, https://investors.amdocs.com/static-files/5ee77709-ef1b-427f-bd96-c72a30eec1e8
  22. 20-F – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1062579/000119312521352655/d180832d20f.htm
  23. Meet the Israeli-linked firm that sold Big Brother machines to Mubarak, Qaddafi – and Washington – Mondoweiss, accessed February 1, 2026, https://mondoweiss.net/2013/06/machines-qaddafi-washington/
  24. An Israeli Trojan Horse – CounterPunch.org, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.counterpunch.org/2008/09/27/an-israeli-trojan-horse/
  25. Amdocs issues tender to build new Israel HQ – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-amdocs-issues-tender-for-new-israel-hq-1001110754
  26. Letter to Shareholders – Investor Relations | Amdocs, accessed February 1, 2026, https://investors.amdocs.com/letter-to-shareholders
  27. TDP – AT&T Israel, accessed February 1, 2026, https://il.att.com/tdp/
  28. AT&T’s search for new age technologies brings it to Israel | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hkhhei053
  29. AT&T’s six-point plan to help Israeli employees in wartime | Ctech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/sys0x11r7p
  30. AT&T Partners With U.S. Military on 5G Focused R&D Experiments – The Futurum Group, accessed February 1, 2026, https://futurumgroup.com/insights/att-partners-with-u-s-military-on-5g-focused-rd-experiments/
  31. IATI MNC Forum – Israel Advanced Technology Industries, accessed February 1, 2026, https://iati.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Booklet-2025.pdf
  32. Armis buys Otorio in $120m deal – Globes – Israel Business News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-armis-buys-1001504019
  33. Armis x Government, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.armis.com/cybersecurity/government/
  34. ServiceNow to buy Israeli cybersecurity startup Armis for $7.75 billion – The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/article-881144
  35. Public Safety Advocate: FirstNet Authority Goes International, Federal Agencies Coordinate Rural Broadband Efforts, NPSTC Awards, AT&T 5G Core in MS Azure Cloud, accessed February 1, 2026, https://allthingsfirstnet.com/public-safety-advocate-firstnet-authority-goes-international-federal-agencies-coordinate-rural-broadband-efforts-npstc-awards-att-5g-core-in-ms-azure-cloud/
  36. The Long Arm of the Law 3.0 – AFCEA Bethesda, accessed February 1, 2026, https://bethesda.afceachapters.org/thought-leadership/the-long-arm-of-the-law-3-0/
  37. Carbyne | Surveillance Watch, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.surveillancewatch.io/entities/carbyne
  38. AT&T launches new smart city projects – Computer Business Review – Tech Monitor, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.techmonitor.ai/technology/emerging-technology/att-smart-city-projects
  39. AT&T and Los Angeles Team Up to Make a Smarter City – Police Magazine, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.policemag.com/news/atampt-and-los-angeles-team-up-to-make-a-smarter-city
  40. Which MVNO has domestic roaming/partner roaming? : r/NoContract – Reddit, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/NoContract/comments/1eoacyx/which_mvno_has_domestic_roamingpartner_roaming/
  41. ‘Israeli cellular companies paid to squat on Palestinian land’ – +972 Magazine, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.972mag.com/israeli-cellular-companies-paid-to-squat-on-palestinian-land/
  42. Israel/West Bank: Separate and Unequal | Human Rights Watch, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/12/19/israel/west-bank-separate-and-unequal
  43. December 17, 2024 Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Wa – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/files/corpfin/no-action/14a-8/ncpprmsci121724-14a8inc.pdf
  44. Class Notes | Lafayette Magazine, accessed February 1, 2026, https://magazine.lafayette.edu/fall2012/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2013/02/classNotes_final.pdf
  45. July / August 2021 – Cornellians – Cornell Alumni, accessed February 1, 2026, https://alumni.cornell.edu/cornellians/class-notes-july-august-2021/
  46. Fighting Terrorism at Home & Abroad – Peace Action, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.peaceaction.org/2007/11/30/fighting-terrorism-at-home-abroad/
  47. Support for Israel and Combatting Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism at Home – The Jewish Community Foundation Of Greater MetroWest NJ (JCFNJ), accessed February 1, 2026, https://jcfgmw.org/support-israel/
  48. mHealth Israel_ PWC_2019 Israel State of Innovation | PDF – Slideshare, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/mhealth-israel-pwc2019-israel-state-of-innovation/143055534

 

Related News & Articles