Bolt Military Audit

Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Scope and Objectives

This forensic audit, commissioned under the remit of Defense Logistics Analysis, executes a comprehensive evaluation of Bolt Technology OÜ (trading globally as Bolt) to ascertain its level of complicity within the Israeli military-industrial complex and the settlement enterprise in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The objective is to provide a granular risk assessment regarding supply chain integrity, data sovereignty, and geopolitical neutrality for defense clients operating in the Levant and North Africa.

The audit distinguishes itself by moving beyond surface-level corporate associations to analyze the “Digital Supply Chain”—the flow of metadata, geospatial telemetry, and algorithmic reliance—which constitutes the modern frontier of military complicity. Furthermore, this report rigorously disambiguates the target entity from similarly named corporations active in the Israeli defense sector to prevent intelligence failures derived from false positives.

1.2. Strategic Verdict: The “Digital Complicity” Paradox

The forensic analysis indicates that while Bolt Technology OÜ maintains a minimal kinetic footprint in the Israeli defense sector—lacking direct procurement contracts for hardware or logistics support to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)—it exhibits a High-Risk Digital Complicity profile. This assessment is driven by the company’s integration of Israeli cyber-intelligence-adjacent technologies (specifically AppsFlyer and Waze) into its global platform.

This “Digital Complicity” has already precipitated kinetic consequences. In the Maghreb theater, specifically Tunisia, Bolt’s data architecture triggered a national security investigation, leading to the suspension of operations and asset seizure based on allegations of leaking citizen data to Israeli servers. For defense logistics planners, Bolt represents a Data Sovereignty Risk rather than a traditional sanctionable entity involved in settlement construction or arms manufacturing.

1.3. Key Forensic Indicators

• Corporate Residency: Bolt maintains an active, tax-paying subsidiary in Israel, Bolt Technologies Ltd (Reg: 516700291), headquartered in Rosh Haayin. This subjects the entity to Israeli judicial and security warrants.¹
• The “Tunisia Protocol” Warning: The operational shutdown of Bolt in Tunisia serves as a critical case study for defense planners. The accusation that Bolt’s SDKs (Software Development Kits) exported sensitive user location data to AppsFlyer (Herzliya, Israel) demonstrates how commercial tech stacks can become vectors for geopolitical conflict.²
• Settlement Avoidance: Unlike its competitor Yango (Russian-owned, Israel-operated), which actively services West Bank settlements, Bolt’s service maps and operational behavior suggest a containment strategy within the “Green Line” (pre-1967 borders), likely due to regulatory friction with the Israeli Ministry of Transport rather than ideological boycott.⁴
• False Positive Disambiguation: The audit explicitly clears Bolt Technology OÜ of involvement in IMOD Tender No. 44531400 (“Bolt production in a package deal”), which refers to mechanical fasteners, and separates it from “Bolt Solutions Inc.,” an Insurtech firm with deep ties to the Israeli startup ecosystem.⁶

2. Forensic Disambiguation and Entity Definition

A primary failure mode in open-source intelligence (OSINT) regarding common industrial terms is the “nomenclature collision.” “Bolt” is a ubiquitous term in both hardware and software sectors. To ensure the integrity of this audit, we first isolate the target entity from non-relevant actors appearing in the defense industrial base.

2.1. Target Entity Profile

• Global Entity: Bolt Technology OÜ.
• Headquarters: Tallinn, Estonia.
• Primary Domains: Mobility (Ride-hailing), Food Delivery (Bolt Food), Micromobility (Scooters/E-bikes).
• Israeli Subsidiary: Bolt Technologies Ltd (Hebrew: בולט טכנולוגיות בע~מ).
• Strategic Relevance: The subject of data leak allegations and civilian transport logistics analysis.

2.2. Exclusion of False Positives

The following entities have surfaced during the data collection phase but are forensically distinct from the target. Their activities must not be attributed to Bolt Technology OÜ in complicity scores.

Analyst Note: The confusion between Bolt Technology OÜ (Mobility) and Bolt Solutions Inc. (Insurance) is particularly acute because Bolt Mobility also offers insurance products (“Bolt Protect”).¹⁴ However, the institutional ties to the Israeli innovation ecosystem (MassChallenge) belong to the Insurance entity, not the Mobility entity. This distinction significantly lowers the “Institutional Complicity” score of the target.

3. Corporate Footprint: The Israeli Subsidiary

The establishment of a legal corporate entity within a jurisdiction is the first tier of complicity analysis. It signifies voluntary subjection to local laws, taxation, and potential conscription of resources (digital or physical) during states of emergency.

3.1. Registration Forensics

Bolt Technology OÜ does not operate in Israel as a remote cross-border digital service; it is a localized corporate citizen.

• Entity Name: Bolt Technologies Ltd.
• Registration Number: 516700291.
• Incorporation Date: 11 February 2022.
• Legal Status: Active (Private Limited Company).
• Registered Address: 11 Amal Street, Rosh Haayin, Israel.¹

Geopolitical Significance of Location:

Rosh Haayin is a city located within the “Green Line” (pre-1967 borders) but in close proximity to the separation barrier and the West Bank. It acts as a bedroom community for the Tel Aviv metropolitan area and hosts several technology parks. The choice of Rosh Haayin over Tel Aviv or Herzliya (the primary tech hubs) is notable but likely driven by operational costs or logistical positioning. Importantly, the office is not located in a West Bank settlement, distinguishing it from companies that establish HQs in industrial zones like Ariel or Ma’ale Adumim to benefit from settlement-specific subsidies.15

3.2. Regulatory Friction and Market Penetration

The depth of a company’s complicity is often correlated with its integration into the state’s critical infrastructure. In Israel, Bolt’s integration has been obstructed by regulatory warfare, limiting its utility as a military logistics asset.

• The “Licensed Taxi” Barrier: Israel’s transportation market is heavily regulated, favoring licensed taxis over private ride-hailing (the UberX model). When Bolt initiated its Israeli market entry, it aggressively recruited drivers with advertisements promising “zero commission” and implied a private-car model.⁴
• Ministry of Transport Hostility: The Israeli Ministry of Transport has historically protected the taxi lobby (Gett). Reports indicate Bolt’s entry was “not coordinated” with the Ministry, leading to threats of regulatory enforcement similar to those that forced Uber to retreat to a taxi-only model.⁴
• Competitive Landscape:
  • Gett: The incumbent, deeply integrated into corporate and state travel.
  • Yango (Yandex): The Russian tech giant, which has aggressively penetrated the market, including services in settlements.⁴
  • Bolt: Remains a tertiary player. Its failure to dominate the market reduces the probability that the IDF relies on Bolt for personnel transport or logistics, unlike its reliance on Gett or Yango for reserve duty transport.

3.3. Financial Flows and Taxation

As an active “Private Limited Company,” Bolt Technologies Ltd pays corporate tax to the Israel Tax Authority. These funds contribute to the general treasury of the State of Israel, which funds the IDF and settlement infrastructure. While this constitutes “Economic Complicity” in the broadest sense (similar to any multinational like Google, Microsoft, or Intel operating in Israel), it is standard for global operations and does not indicate specific military contracting.

4. The Digital Complicity Vector: Intelligence and Data Sovereignty

In modern warfare, the “supply chain” includes the flow of digital exhaust—metadata, location history, and user identifiers. This is the vector where Bolt exhibits the highest risk profile. The forensic audit identifies two critical technologies embedded in the Bolt platform that tether it to the Israeli security ecosystem: AppsFlyer and Waze.

4.1. The AppsFlyer Connection: A Case Study in Data Leakage

The most volatile element of Bolt’s profile is its utilization of AppsFlyer, a mobile marketing analytics and attribution platform.

Vendor Profile:

• HQ: Herzliya, Israel.
• Ecosystem Position: AppsFlyer is a “unicorn” in the Israeli “AdTech” sector. This sector is notoriously porous with the Israeli cyber-intelligence community (Unit 8200), as the skills required for high-frequency ad targeting (tracking, device fingerprinting, behavioral analysis) are dual-use technologies applicable to surveillance.²

The “Tunisia Protocol” Incident:

The theoretical risk of this partnership materialized into a diplomatic and security crisis in Tunisia, offering a precedent for Defense Logistics Analysts.

1. The Allegation: In 2022, the Tunisian investigative outlet Al Qatiba published a report accusing Bolt of embedding AppsFlyer trackers in its user app. The investigation claimed this constituted a “data leak to the Zionist entity”.²
2. Technical Mechanism: The Bolt app utilizes the AppsFlyer SDK to track “install attribution”—determining which ad campaign caused a user to download the app. To do this, the SDK collects granular telemetry: IP addresses, Device IDs (IDFA/GAID), battery status, and sensor data. This data is transmitted to AppsFlyer’s servers (cloud-hosted, but legally domiciled in Israel) for processing.¹⁷
3. Regulatory Reaction: The Tunisian National Authority for the Protection of Personal Data (INPDP) validated the claim, stating that Bolt was “exporting” personal data to Israel without a license. This was framed as a violation of Tunisian digital sovereignty.²
4. Operational Consequences: The Tunisian government launched a broader investigation into Bolt for money laundering and tax evasion—charges often used to leverage political bans. This resulted in the seizure of 12 million Tunisian Dinars ($3.8M) and the suspension of Bolt’s operations in the country.³

Implications for Defense Logistics:

For a defense client, the risk is not that Bolt intends to spy, but that its Third-Party Dependency (AppsFlyer) places user data within the reach of Israeli intelligence services. Under Israeli law, companies can be compelled to provide data for national security purposes. If a defense contractor in a sensitive zone (e.g., Beirut, Cairo, Amman) uses Bolt, their movement patterns are theoretically visible to AppsFlyer, and by extension, could be accessible to the IDF.

4.2. Waze SDK and Geospatial Complicity

Bolt’s driver application integrates with Waze for navigation and routing optimization.

• Origin: Waze is an Israeli technology firm (acquired by Google) that originated as “FreeMap Israel.” It was developed with a specific focus on navigating the complex, security-fractured road network of Israel and the West Bank.²¹
• Data Exchange: To function, the Bolt app must pass the driver’s start and end coordinates to Waze. The Waze Transport SDK facilitates this data exchange.²³
• Mapping Politics: Waze has been criticized for how it maps the Occupied Territories—often prioritizing settler routes and bypassing Palestinian villages or marking them as high-risk zones. By using Waze, Bolt inherits this geopolitical mapping logic. The algorithm directs drivers via routes optimized by Israeli security considerations, implicitly normalizing the settlement infrastructure (e.g., Highway 443 or Route 60 bypass roads).²²

Conclusion on Digital Complicity:

Bolt’s tech stack is structurally Zionist. It relies on Israeli innovation (AppsFlyer, Waze) for core functionality (marketing attribution and navigation). While this is commercially rational—Israel is a global leader in these sectors—it creates an unavoidable data conduit to the Israeli jurisdiction.

5. Operational Logistics: Settlements and The West Bank

A critical component of the “Military Complicity” audit is determining if the entity provides services to illegal settlements in the West Bank, which are considered war crimes under the Fourth Geneva Convention by many international bodies.

5.1. Service Area Analysis

• Bolt’s Coverage: The snippet data listing Bolt’s operational cities in Asia includes “Tel Aviv” (implied via app stores) but does not list specific West Bank settlements such as Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim, or Efrat in its official city lists.⁵
• Bolt Drive Restrictions: The terms for “Bolt Drive” (car rental) in Europe explicitly prohibit cross-border travel (e.g., Germany to Poland restrictions).²⁵ While specific terms for Israel are not fully parsed in the public snippets, the absence of settlements in the city list is a significant negative indicator.
• Comparison with Yango (Yandex): The competitor Yango is explicitly documented as operating in settlements. Yango’s algorithms serve Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim, and the company has been targeted by activists for this direct service provision.⁴
• Comparison with Wolt: Wolt faced controversy for its “Only on Wolt” exclusivity contracts and has expanded service to “periphery” areas, often a euphemism that can include settlement blocs, though they officially claim to serve “communities in the North” like Kiryat Shmona (within Green Line).²⁷

Forensic Finding: There is no positive evidence in the current dataset that Bolt actively markets or provides service within West Bank settlements. The company appears to focus on the Tel Aviv metropolitan core and other major secular centers. This is likely a function of its limited market share rather than a moral stance, but the effect is a lower complicity score compared to Yango.

5.2. Military Base Deliveries (The “Bolt Food” Vector)

• The Kiryat Gat Phenomenon: Recent reports highlight an influx of US service members at the “Civil-Military Coordination Center” base near Kiryat Gat. These personnel utilize local apps for food delivery.²⁹
• Bolt Food Availability: Bolt Food operates in Israel and competes with Wolt.³⁰
• Assessment: It is highly probable, bordering on certain, that Bolt Food couriers deliver to the gates of IDF bases and the US facility in Kiryat Gat. However, this is B2C (Business-to-Consumer) activity—individual soldiers ordering burgers—rather than B2G (Business-to-Government) logistics contracts.
  • Contrast: Companies like Shufersal (Israeli supermarket giant) have direct supply chain integration for base logistics. Bolt Food does not; it is an “incidental” service provider.³²

6. Financial and Political Linkages

6.1. Investor Composition

The flow of capital is a key indicator of influence. Bolt’s cap table is notably international, diluting Israeli influence.

• Didi Chuxing (China): A major strategic investor.³⁴ The presence of a Chinese state-linked tech giant in Bolt’s cap table presents a counter-intelligence risk regarding Israel, rather than a complicity risk with Israel. It is unlikely that Chinese investors would encourage deep integration with the Israeli military establishment due to their own geopolitical balancing act in the Middle East.
• Daimler (Germany) & Sequoia (US): Standard Western venture capital.³⁴
• World Bank (IFC): Investment aimed at emerging markets (Africa/Eastern Europe).³⁴

Assessment: The ownership structure is Geopolitically Agnostic. There is no controlling interest by Israeli state funds or settlement-affiliated tycoons (unlike Rami Levy, who owns a supermarket chain servicing settlements and is a key figure in the settlement economy ¹⁵).

6.2. Political Posture and “Neutrality”

• Corporate Culture: Bolt’s CEO, Markus Villig, has built a brand identity around “frugality” and “efficiency,” often contrasting with Uber’s excess.³⁶ The company’s expansion strategy targets Africa and Eastern Europe aggressively.
• Conflict Avoidance: Unlike Wolt, whose management faced internal backlash for donating to Israeli relief funds post-October 7 while ignoring Gaza ³⁷, Bolt has not appeared in the snippets as making high-profile political donations to either side.
• The “Wolt vs. Bolt” Narrative: In the “court of public opinion” (Reddit, social media), couriers and users often debate the ethics of the platforms. Wolt is perceived as more “corporate” and aligned with the status quo, while Bolt is often cited as the “cheaper” alternative with less baggage, though complaints about courier pay persist across both.³⁸

7. Comparative Complicity Matrix

To provide the Defense Logistics Analyst with a relative risk scale, we benchmark Bolt against its primary competitors and partners in the theater.

Table Analysis:

• Yango represents the highest direct complicity due to settlement operations.
• AppsFlyer represents the highest structural complicity due to its nature as an Israeli surveillance-adjacent technology.
• Bolt sits at Tier 4: Its complicity is derived almost entirely from its use of AppsFlyer and its legal presence in the country, rather than active support of the occupation.

8. Strategic Recommendations for Defense Logistics

Based on the forensic audit, the following recommendations are issued for defense clients operating in the Israel-Palestine theater and the broader MENA region:

8.1. Supply Chain Integrity Recommendation

Status: CLEARED (With Conditions).

Bolt Technology OÜ is cleared for use in non-sensitive logistics (e.g., civilian transport of off-duty personnel, food delivery for R&R). There is no evidence of the entity manufacturing weapons or providing material support to the settlement enterprise. The “Bolt Production” tenders 6 are confirmed false positives referring to hardware fasteners, not the software company.

8.2. Information Security (INFOSEC) Advisory

Status: RESTRICTED.

Personnel operating in high-threat counter-intelligence environments (e.g., Lebanon, Syria, Tunisia, Iran) are PROHIBITED from installing the Bolt application on mission-critical devices.

• Reasoning: The integration of the AppsFlyer SDK creates a potential “backdoor” for metadata leakage to Israeli servers. While Bolt (Estonia) may not be complicit, the data architecture allows for the theoretical mapping of user movements by Israeli SIGINT agencies (Unit 8200) via the third-party vendor. The Tunisia incident ³ serves as proof-of-concept for this vulnerability.

8.3. Corporate Responsibility & Ethics

Status: LOW RISK.

For clients adhering to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) or ethical procurement guidelines regarding the Occupation:

• Bolt is a preferable alternative to Yango, which actively normalizes settlement geography.
• Bolt carries less political baggage than Wolt, which has engaged in corporate donation campaigns perceived as one-sided by pro-Palestinian observers.³⁷

8.4. Future Monitoring Triggers

Analysts should monitor the following indicators for a change in risk status:

1. Launch of “Bolt Business” for IDF: If Bolt explicitly bids for the IDF’s personnel transport tender (currently dominated by Gett), the complicity score shifts to Tier 2.
2. Expansion to Settlements: Any update to Bolt’s service map including Ariel, Efrat, or Modi’in Illit would trigger an immediate re-classification to “Settlement Complicit.”
3. Tunisia Re-entry: The resolution of the Tunisian legal case will indicate whether Bolt successfully “sanitized” its tech stack of Israeli trackers to appease Arab regulators.

9. Conclusion

The forensic audit concludes that Bolt Technology OÜ is a commercial opportunist in the Israeli market rather than an ideological participant in the conflict. Its “Military Complicity” is inadvertent and digital, stemming from the necessity of using Israeli technology (Waze, AppsFlyer) to function in a market dominated by Israeli innovation.

While the company does not build the settlements or arm the soldiers, its digital nervous system is inextricably linked to the “Start-up Nation” ecosystem, which is itself a subsidiary of the Israeli defense establishment. For the Defense Logistics Analyst, Bolt is a Clean Logistics Provider wrapped in a Compromised Digital Wrapper.

1. BOLT TECHNOLOGIES LTD – Israel Company Information – KYC Israel, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.kycisrael.com/companies/516700291/bolt-technologies-ltd/
2. Tunisian officials say transport app leaks data to Israel – The New Arab, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.newarab.com/news/tunisian-officials-say-transport-app-leaks-data-israel
3. Tunisia investigates ride-hailing app for money-laundering, shuts operations, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://thearabweekly.com/tunisia-investigates-ride-hailing-app-money-laundering-shuts-operations
4. Uber competitor Bolt enters Israeli market | Ctech, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/i5xc9ayxl
5. Use Bolt in cities around the world, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://bolt.eu/cities/
6. Bolt production in a package deal – Israel – Tender Impulse, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://tenderimpulse.com/government-tenders/israel/bolt-production-in-a-package-deal-7229076
7. BOLT® Solutions, Inc. Partners with MassChallenge Israel to Share InsurTech Expertise and Guide the Next Generation of Entrepreneurs – Coverager, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://coverager.com/bolt-solutions-inc-partners-masschallenge-israel-share-insurtech-expertise-guide-next-generation-entrepreneurs/
8. Insurance agency software | bolttech, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://bolttech.io/use-cases/insurance-software-for-agents/
9. bolt Announces New Roles for Senior Leaders – PR Newswire, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bolt-announces-new-roles-for-senior-leaders-301340526.html
10. Bolt Projects Reports Q3 2025 Financial Results, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.boltprojectsholdings.com/bolt-projects-reports-q3-2025-financial-results
11. Bolt Projects Reports Q4 2024 Financial Results – SEC.gov, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1841125/000184112525000020/bolt-ex991x2025x03x18xbolt.htm
12. The Bolt Report – Wikipedia, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bolt_Report
13. Bolt Report: News Corp refuses to confirm reports show has been dropped – The Guardian, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jan/18/bolt-report-news-corp-refuses-to-confirm-reports-show-has-been-dropped
14. World Trips – Bolt – Device Protection, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://protect.boltinsurance.com/worldtrips/
15. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.whoprofits.org/index.php/companies/excel/8?Traded=3&Type=Table&page=1
16. Mobile Marketing Partners | AppsFlyer Integration Ecosystem, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.appsflyer.com/solutions/partners/
17. Cookie policy – B&B Villa Giulia, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://bebvillagiulia.com/en/cookie-policy/
18. Bossware and Employment Tech Database – Coworker.org, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://home.coworker.org/worktech/
19. Bolt Quits Tunisia After Contested Government Suspension – We are Tech, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.wearetech.africa/en/fils-uk/news/tech/bolt-quits-tunisia-after-contested-government-suspension
20. Tunisia Moves to Suspend Bolt Over Tax and Licensing Allegations – Fintech News Africa, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://fintechnews.africa/44955/fintech-tunisia/tunisia-suspends-bolt-ride-hailing-app/
21. Google Testing A CarPool Service RideWith Powered By Waze – Techweez, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://techweez.com/2015/07/08/google-carpool-service-ridewith/
22. Waze Business Model | Revenue Insights – White Label Fox, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://whitelabelfox.com/waze-business-model/
23. About the Waze Transport SDK | Google for Developers, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://developers.google.com/waze/intro-transport
24. West Bank Tinderbox: New Israeli Settlement Ignites Worldwide Backlash, Yet IDF Presses On – YouTube, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82Zb4oCd49g
25. Bolt Drive service area | For Riders | Bolt Support, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://bolt.eu/support/articles/360020656560/
26. Yango Group – Wikipedia, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yango_Group
27. Wolt expands service to Israel’s Galilee region | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/all-news/article-744518
28. Wolt to pay NIS 8.5 million for violating competition law | Ctech, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/sy0sow11en
29. Kiryat Gat US base transforms city life – Israel Hayom, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/10/30/kiryat-gat-american-soldiers-base-cultural-impact/
30. Bolt Food | Food delivery and takeout | Order food near you, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://bolt.eu/en/food/
31. Bolt Food: Food Delivery and Takeaway, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://food.bolt.eu/
32. Shopic’s frictionless solution increased shoppers’ monthly spending by 8%, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.shopic.co/knownledge/customer-case-study/
33. RFID, AIDC, and IoT News Round Up for June 29, 2022 – Supply Chain Digest, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/22-06-29_rfid_bar_code_news_roundup.php?cid=20030
34. Bolt (company) – Wikipedia, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolt_(company)
35. Kosher or cruel? The Jewish ethical dilemma of factory-farmed meat – The Jerusalem Post, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/judaism/article-861358
36. How a 19 Year Old From Estonia Quietly Built an $8.4B Rival to Uber | by Celestine Riza Tsuki | Dec, 2025 | Medium, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://medium.com/@celestineriza/how-a-19-year-old-from-estonia-quietly-built-an-8-4b-rival-to-uber-ba5b901c0b0f
37. Wolt Claims to be Apolitical but its Actions Suggest Otherwise – The Left Berlin, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://theleftberlin.com/wolt-israel-palestine/
38. Bolt vs Wolt, non-transparent and unfair practices of Wolt, from a courier’s perspective. : r/Slovakia – Reddit, accessed on January 21, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Slovakia/comments/1j2hym7/bolt_vs_wolt_netransparentn%C3%A9_a_neferove_praktiky/?tl=en