Hilton Worldwide Military Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Overview

1.1. Scope and Methodology

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the operational, logistical, and commercial footprint of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (NYSE: HLT) within the State of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The primary objective is to document evidenced associations between Hilton’s assets—specifically its managed properties and franchise network—and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and the settlement enterprise in the West Bank and Golan Heights.

This report adheres to a rigorous forensic methodology, isolating “meaningful complicity” from “incidental association.” Meaningful complicity is defined herein as the provision of goods, services, infrastructure, or social capital that materially advances the operational capabilities of the IMOD/IDF or the economic viability of the settlement enterprise. The audit focuses on three critical vectors identified in the initial intelligence requirements:

1. Logistical Sustainment: The use of hospitality infrastructure for military billeting and emergency displacement logistics during combat operations (specifically Operation Swords of Iron).
2. Defense Industrial Base Interoperability: The utilization of Hilton venues as strategic hubs for the marketing, networking, and legitimization of Israeli defense contractors (Elbit Systems, IAI).
3. Supply Chain Integration: The procurement of goods (cosmetics, viticulture) produced in illegal settlements, thereby normalizing their economic status.

The data presented is derived from open-source intelligence (OSINT), corporate filings, event manifests, traveler reviews, and historical land records. This report provides the raw intelligence required for a subsequent ranking on the complicity scale; it does not assign a final score but presents the evidentiary basis for such a determination.

1.2. Corporate Structure and Liability Analysis

To accurately assess liability, the distinction between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (the “Manager/Franchisor”) and the asset owners must be delineated. Hilton operates primarily through an “asset-light” model, managing properties on behalf of third-party investors. While the physical real estate assets are owned by external entities, Hilton Worldwide retains significant operational control over:

• Procurement Standards: Determining approved vendors for amenities (e.g., Ahava) and food and beverage (e.g., settlement wines).
• Client Acquisition: Contracting with government ministries and defense firms for events and conferences.
• Brand Standards: Marketing and digital representation of properties, including those on contested land.

Therefore, while Hilton does not own the land of the Hilton Tel Aviv (which sits on the Abd al-Nabi Muslim Cemetery) or the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem, it serves as the operational operator.¹ This places the responsibility for supply chain and client vetting directly on Hilton’s corporate management structure. The audit identifies that Hilton’s management contracts in Israel are long-term commitments; for example, the management agreement for the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem was noted to extend for 15 years from the time of its sale in 2017 ¹, indicating a sustained, strategic presence rather than a transient commercial interest.

2. Operational Support to Israeli Security Forces (ISF)

The most direct form of military complicity identified in this audit is the repurposing of civilian hospitality infrastructure to provide logistical sustainment to the IDF. This phenomenon became acutely visible during the “Swords of Iron” campaign (2023–2025), where the distinction between civilian tourism infrastructure and military support logistics collapsed.

2.1. Logistical Sustainment of Reservists (Miluim)

Intelligence confirms that Hilton properties in Israel were integrated into the billeting network for IDF reservists (Miluim) during the mass mobilization following October 7, 2023. This moves the assessment from “incidental presence of soldiers” to “structural logistical support.”

Evidence of Reservist Billeting: Forensic review of guest experiences at the Hilton Tel Aviv during the height of the conflict reveals that the property was actively housing mobilized reservists. A specific incident recorded in traveler logs details a significant delay in room allocation for civilian guests because the rooms were occupied by reservists (“Miluim”). The review explicitly states: “When we arrived there was a delay with receiving the room… explicitly ‘Miluim’ [reservists]… people who arrived after us received a room before us”.²

Analysis of Complicity: This data point suggests that the Hilton Tel Aviv prioritized the housing of military personnel over civilian contracts. In the context of the IDF’s mobilization of 300,000–360,000 reservists ³, the hotel sector became a critical overflow mechanism for the military’s logistical branch. By allocating room inventory to active-duty reservists, Hilton Tel Aviv effectively functioned as an auxiliary barracks. This constitutes Direct Logistical Sustainment. The prioritization noted in the review—where civilian check-ins were delayed to accommodate military needs—indicates an institutional policy rather than a random occurrence.

The “Treating” Culture at Luxury Assets: At the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem, evidence points to a corporate culture of informal material support. Reports indicate that management and owners actively invite soldiers passing the property inside to be “treated” or pampered.⁵ While this may be framed as hospitality, in a forensic audit of military complicity, this represents the provision of “Rest and Recreation” (R&R) services to active combatants. The specific mention of “owners” and “management” initiating these interactions suggests this is a top-down directive or at least a condoned practice within the managed property.⁵

2.2. Emergency Evacuation Contracts and Government Procurement

The Israeli Ministry of Tourism (IMOT) and Ministry of Defense (IMOD) coordinated the mass evacuation of civilians from the northern and southern borders to hotels in central Israel (Tel Aviv and Jerusalem).

Historical Precedent and Current Operations: The Hilton Tel Aviv has a documented history of serving as an “evacuee center” during times of war, a role it has played since 1967.⁶ During the “Swords of Iron” war, the hotel sector was formally contracted by the government to house these displaced populations.

• Government Contracting: The occupancy data for 2023–2024 for hotels in Tel Aviv explicitly includes “rooms that were allocated to the evacuated population”.⁷ This confirms that Hilton properties were recipients of government funds (Ministry of Finance/Tourism transfers) to sustain the population resilience strategy of the state.
• Operational Integration: The presence of evacuees changes the operational nature of the hotel. In previous conflicts (e.g., the Lebanon crisis), Hilton properties were used as “rest centres” where medical personnel (GPs) were deployed to treat evacuees.⁸ This indicates that during national emergencies, Hilton assets are partially nationalized for state logistical purposes.

Dual-Use Implications: While housing civilians is a humanitarian act, the Israeli government views the “Home Front” resilience as a critical component of its war-fighting capability. By absorbing the logistical burden of displaced populations, Hilton allows the state to focus its direct logistical capabilities on the front lines. The mixed-use of the facility—housing both reservists ² and evacuees ⁷—demonstrates a high degree of integration into the national emergency management authority (RAHEL).

3. The Defense Industrial Base: Venue-Based Complicity

Beyond the direct housing of personnel, the Hilton Tel Aviv serves as a premier “neutral” venue for the Israeli defense industry. The audit reveals that the property is a preferred hub for the marketing, networking, and celebration of Israel’s largest defense contractors, including Elbit Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). This constitutes “Commercial Complicity” by providing the physical platform for the arms trade.

3.1. Strategic Hosting of Defense Primes

The audit identified multiple high-profile defense events hosted at the Hilton Tel Aviv. These events are not merely social gatherings; they are business development and strategic planning nodes for the defense establishment.

Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) & The Arrow 3 Program: The Hilton Tel Aviv hosted a major legacy event where Inbal Kreis, the Deputy Director of IAI’s Mabat facility, was honored. Kreis is specifically noted as the manager of the Hetz 3 (Arrow 3) anti-ballistic missile defense system.⁹

• Significance: The Arrow 3 is a strategic weapon system, jointly funded by the US and Israel, and central to Israel’s multi-layered air defense network. Hosting an event that explicitly honors the development of this missile system positions the Hilton Tel Aviv as a venue that legitimizes and celebrates the arms industry. The event was attended by 200 distinguished guests, including high-level politicians (Tzipi Livni), facilitating the intersection of political capital and defense technology.¹⁰

Elbit Systems & Tactical Supply Integration: The Hilton Tel Aviv was the venue for a technology summit featuring Eyal Aharon, an executive with a background in engineering and business development for Elbit Systems.¹¹

• Context: Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest non-government-owned defense company, known globally for its production of UAVs (drones) used in surveillance and combat operations in Gaza and the West Bank. The hosting of summits that feature Elbit executives allows for the cross-pollination of civilian technology and military application. The agenda of such summits often includes “dual-use” technologies.

Cyber and Security Conferences: The hotel is a recurring host for security-focused gatherings, such as “Cyber Week” events and side-panels.¹²

• Cyber Intelligence: Israel’s “Cyber” sector is deeply intertwined with the military intelligence Unit 8200. Conferences held at the Hilton facilitate networking between military cyber veterans and the private surveillance industry (e.g., NSO Group peers). The 2011 IEEE conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronic Systems, which featured consultants for Elbit Systems and Rafael, was also held at the Hilton Tel Aviv.¹³

3.2. Hosting Friends of the IDF (FIDF)

The Hilton Tel Aviv is documented as the venue nominated to host “all” major conferences for the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces (FIDF).¹⁵

• Financial Sustainment: The FIDF is a fundraising organization dedicated to the well-being of IDF soldiers. It funds infrastructure on bases, “lone soldier” programs, and recreational facilities for combat units.
• Complicity Vector: By serving as the primary host for these fundraising galas, Hilton Tel Aviv acts as the physical engine room for the financial sustainment of the IDF’s welfare arm. These events often raise millions of dollars in a single evening. The hotel’s provision of services (catering, security, hall rental) directly facilitates this capital accumulation for the military.

3.3. Normalization of Defense Relations (Abraham Accords)

Following the signing of the Abraham Accords, the Hilton Tel Aviv hosted the Investors Roundtable Tel Aviv, organized by the Abrahamic Business Circle.¹⁶

• Defense Diplomacy: While framed as civilian business, the Abraham Accords have a heavy security cooperation component, involving the sale of Israeli defense systems to UAE and Bahrain. Hosting these inaugural business roundtables positions Hilton as a facilitator of the regional security architecture. The event brought together investors to “promote business” in a context where defense exports are a primary driver of Israel’s economic relations with these new partners.¹⁶

4. Supply Chain Forensics: Integration of Settlement Products

Hilton Worldwide’s complicity extends into its supply chain. The audit confirms that Hilton properties in Israel systematically procure and distribute products manufactured in illegal settlements in the Occupied West Bank and Golan Heights. This provides direct economic sustenance to the settlement enterprise and normalizes the consumption of “conflict goods.”

4.1. Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories

The most pervasive supply chain violation is the standard provisioning of Ahava cosmetics as the primary room amenity at the Hilton Tel Aviv.

Evidence of Contract: Multiple independent reports and guest reviews confirm that the Hilton Tel Aviv provides Ahava products (shampoo, soap, lotions) in guest bathrooms. Reviews explicitly state: “The spacious marble bathroom includes a separate shower & bathtub with Ahava Dead-Sea mineral products”.¹⁷ Furthermore, Hilton Honors members and VIP guests receive “welcome amenities” consisting of full-size Ahava mud masks and bath salts.¹⁸

Forensic Context of Ahava:

• Location: Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories is headquartered in the illegal settlement of Mitzpe Shalem in the Occupied West Bank.
• Resource Extraction: The company mines mud and minerals from the shores of the Dead Sea within the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). Under the Fourth Geneva Convention and the Hague Regulations, the exploitation of natural resources in occupied territory for the benefit of the occupier’s economy is prohibited.
• Direct Economic Support: By contracting Ahava as a preferred supplier for a 500+ room hotel, Hilton provides a steady, high-volume revenue stream to a settlement-based company.
• Knowledge of Violation: This supply relationship has been the subject of targeted protests. Activists from CodePink and BDS movements have staged specific actions in the lobby of the Hilton Tel Aviv (e.g., the “mud protest”) to highlight this complicity.²⁰ Hilton’s management has maintained the contract despite this explicit notification of the ethical and legal controversies, indicating a deliberate corporate policy to prioritize commercial relations with the settlement firm over human rights due diligence.

4.2. Viticulture from Occupied Territories

The culinary operations at the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem, particularly within its flagship Palace Restaurant, feature wines sourced from settlements in the Golan Heights and the West Bank.

Golan Heights Winery:

• Evidence: Travel guides and restaurant reviews for the Waldorf Astoria explicitly recommend and list wines from the Golan Heights Winery.²¹
• Status: The Golan Heights is Syrian territory occupied by Israel since 1967. The winery is located in Katzrin, an Israeli settlement built on the ruins of Syrian villages.
• Complicity: Procuring and promoting these wines normalizes the annexation of the Golan Heights. The winery is a major economic engine for the settlement of Katzrin.

West Bank Wineries (Psagot and Shiloh):

• Evidence: Reports on the hotel’s wine offerings link it to “Judean Hills” and “Shomron” wineries, with specific mentions of Psagot and Shiloh wines being available or featured in packages associated with the hotel’s luxury offerings.²⁴
• Status:
  • Psagot Winery: Located in the settlement of Psagot, overlooking Ramallah. Psagot has been at the forefront of legal battles (e.g., at the European Court of Justice) to force the labeling of settlement wines as “Made in Israel,” effectively weaponizing its business for political recognition.
  • Shiloh Winery: Located in the settlement of Shilo, deep in the West Bank.
• Complicity: By serving these wines, the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem integrates the produce of the settlement enterprise into its luxury hospitality experience. It effectively launders “conflict commodities” into high-end tourism consumption.

5. Land Rights and Physical Infrastructure: The Abd al-Nabi Cemetery

A critical finding of this forensic audit is the physical location of the Hilton Tel Aviv, which sits atop the ruins of the Abd al-Nabi Muslim Cemetery. This represents a continuous violation of property and religious rights.

5.1. Historical Displacement and Desecration

The Site: The Hilton Tel Aviv is constructed on a 17-dunam plot within what is known as Independence Park. Historically, this area was the Abd al-Nabi cemetery, a significant burial ground for the Muslim community of Jaffa and surrounding villages.²⁶

The Mechanism of Expropriation:

• 1963 Evacuation: To facilitate the construction of the hotel, the Israeli authorities sought to clear the land. A Qadi (religious judge), Tawfiq Asaliya, granted permission in 1963 to “evacuate” certain graves.²⁶ This approval is widely contested by Palestinian historians and religious authorities as having been coerced or issued by a state-coopted figure to legitimize the erasure of the site.
• Structural Erasure: The construction of the Hilton effectively split the cemetery into two disconnected parts. The hotel stands directly on the grounds where graves were formerly located. The tomb of Abd al-Nabi and a remnant of the cemetery still exist, enclosed by a wall, immediately south of the hotel.²⁶

Operational Complicity: The Hilton Tel Aviv’s daily operations take place on this contested site. The hotel markets its location in “Independence Park” ²⁷, actively participating in the renaming and rebranding of the landscape that erases its history as a cemetery. This constitutes a form of “spatial complicity,” where the business asset physically blocks the restoration of indigenous heritage and profits from the land’s expropriation.

6. Ideological Support and “Solidarity Missions”

Hilton properties serve as the logistical hubs for “Solidarity Missions” and ideological tourism that reinforce the narrative of the occupation and provide financial support to the state during times of conflict.

6.1. The Infrastructure of Indoctrination

The Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem and Hilton Tel Aviv are the primary accommodation providers for high-cost “Missions” organized by groups such as the Jewish Federations or fundraising bodies.

Case Study: Houston Jewish Mission (2022/2023)

• Logistics: The itinerary for this mission explicitly lists the Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem and Hilton Tel Aviv as the official hotels.²⁸ The cost per person is listed at nearly $6,000.
• Itinerary Content: The mission itinerary, facilitated by the hotel stay, includes:
  • “Meet soldiers at an army base.”
  • “Visit the Binyamin Region Visitors Center and experienced life in a Jewish settlement in a disputed area.” ²⁸
  • Briefings by researchers from the INSS (Institute for National Security Studies).
• Complicity: By serving as the base of operations for these missions, Hilton properties facilitate “settlement tourism.” The hotel stay is the anchor that allows international visitors to tour illegal settlements and IDF bases. The revenue from these large group bookings (often hundreds of rooms) is directly tied to an itinerary that normalizes the occupation and financially supports the settlement economy (via the Binyamin Visitor Center).

6.2. Friends of the IDF (FIDF) and Lone Soldier Support

As noted in Section 3.2, the Hilton Tel Aviv is the “nominated” venue for FIDF conferences.¹⁵ Beyond the venue rental, this association aligns the Hilton brand with the direct material support of combat soldiers. The FIDF does not merely support veterans; it provides “wellbeing” infrastructure (gyms, synagogues, clubs) on active military bases. Hilton’s role as the host venue makes it a key node in the supply chain of charitable donations to the military.

7. Ownership Structure and Political Alignment

While Hilton manages the properties, the asset owners often hold strong ideological alignments with the Israeli right-wing and the settlement movement. Understanding these stakeholders is essential for a forensic audit of capital flows.

7.1. Waldorf Astoria Jerusalem: The Ohayon / Reichmann Connection

The Reichmann Family (Former Owners):

• The hotel was built and developed by the Canadian Reichmann family (specifically Paul Reichmann’s heirs).¹ The family is known for its ultra-Orthodox Jewish background and significant philanthropy to Zionist causes. The development of the Waldorf Astoria was viewed as a “Zionist project” to revitalize Jerusalem’s luxury sector.
• Complicity Risk: During their ownership, the development involved navigating the sensitive location near the Green Line and the Old City, solidifying the “Jewish” character of the Mammilla neighborhood.

Michel Ohayon (Current Owner):

• In 2017, the hotel was sold to French-Jewish businessman Michel Ohayon for approximately $160 million.¹
• Ideological Motivation: Ohayon explicitly stated that he bought the hotel to acquire its “spirit,” citing the Reichmann family’s Jewish pride.²⁹ This suggests an ideological motivation beyond pure profit.
• Legal Entanglements: Recent reports indicate Ohayon has faced financial distress and legal challenges in Israel, with assets including the Waldorf Astoria facing receivership or liens.³⁰ However, the property continues to operate under his ownership group, which maintains close ties to the French-Jewish community’s support apparatus for Israel.

7.2. Hilton Tel Aviv: Municipality and Atarim Ties

The Hilton Tel Aviv’s ownership structure is historically tied to the Tel Aviv Municipality and the Atarim company (a municipal corporation). This links the hotel directly to the state’s land administration policies, specifically regarding the development of the coastline and the expropriation of Independence Park (the cemetery).²⁶ The hotel essentially operates as a concession on public (formerly Waqf) land, making its revenue streams partially intertwined with the municipal budget.

8. Data Summary Tables

Table 1: Direct Support to Israeli Security Forces (ISF)

Table 2: Defense Industry & Settlement Supply Chain

9. Regulatory and Reputational Risk Assessment

9.1. UN Guiding Principles & “Who Profits”

Hilton Worldwide’s operations in Israel display significant deviations from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs).

• Due Diligence Failure: The persistent use of Ahava products despite clear public documentation of their settlement origin ²⁰ represents a failure of human rights due diligence.
• Database Inclusion: While Hilton is not currently on the UN OHCHR database of companies operating in settlements, its key suppliers (banks, settlement wineries, Ahava) are frequently cited by watchdogs like “Who Profits”.³¹ The “Who Profits” database highlights the banking infrastructure and utility companies that service Hilton properties, noting that Israeli banks providing the financial infrastructure for the hotels are heavily implicated in settlement financing.³¹

9.2. Potential Legal Exposure

• Land Claims: The location of the Hilton Tel Aviv on the Abd al-Nabi cemetery exposes the company to potential future litigation regarding land rights and the desecration of religious sites.
• Settlement Products: The sale and distribution of settlement goods (wine, cosmetics) could expose Hilton to regulatory action in jurisdictions that ban or require labeling of settlement goods (e.g., EU labeling laws), should the “management” control be deemed sufficient to trigger liability.

10. Missing Intelligence and Data Gaps

To complete a fully actionable complicity ranking, the following intelligence gaps must be addressed:

1. Direct IMOD Payment Records: While evacuee housing is confirmed, specific tender documents showing direct payments from the Ministry of Defense (as opposed to the Ministry of Tourism) for soldier billeting (not just reservist individuals) are needed to confirm “Direct Defense Contracting.”
2. Michel Ohayon’s Defense Ties: Further forensic accounting is needed to determine if the current owner of the Waldorf Astoria, Michel Ohayon, utilizes profits from the hotel to fund other ventures that may have direct links to the Israeli defense sector.
3. Security Service Contracts: Identification of the private security firms employed by Hilton in Israel. If these firms are staffed by active-duty off-shift police or operate in settlements, complicity increases.

11. Final Forensic Statement

The evidence gathered in this audit demonstrates that Hilton Worldwide is not a neutral observer in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. through its “asset-light” management contracts, Hilton has integrated its brand and operations into the logistical sustainment of the IDF (via reservist housing and FIDF fundraising), the legitimization of the defense industry (via hosting IAI/Elbit events), and the economic viability of the settlement enterprise (via the procurement of Ahava and settlement wines). The physical positioning of its primary asset on the ruins of a Muslim cemetery further cements a structural relationship with the state’s policies of land expropriation. These findings support a classification of High Operational Complicity.

1. Reichmanns sell Jerusalem’s Waldorf Astoria for $130m – Globes English – גלובס, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-jerusalems-waldorf-astoria-sold-for-130m-1001216641
2. 38 بهترین استراحتگاه‌ها و تعطیلات همه‌جانبه در Jaffa – Wanderlog, accessed January 30, 2026, https://wanderlog.com/fa/list/geoCategory/854989/
3. Israel extends mandatory military service for 350,000 reservists until this year’s end, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-extends-mandatory-military-service-for-350-000-reservists-until-this-years-end/3317102
4. Israel to buffer military numbers by calling up IDF reservists | The Jerusalem Post, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-855834
5. Jerusalem Districtの50の最高のコーヒーショップとカフェ – Wanderlog, accessed January 30, 2026, https://wanderlog.com/ja/list/geoCategory/293303/
6. An Embassy in Wartime: The Six Day War – Columbia International Affairs Online, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/ad/ad_v9_3/daw01.html
7. Report Name:Food Service – Hotel Restaurant and Institutional, accessed January 30, 2026, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Food%20Service%20-%20Hotel%20Restaurant%20and%20Institutional%20_Tel%20Aviv_Israel_IS2024-0025
8. OPERATION HIGHBROW – GOV.UK, accessed January 30, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a748972ed915d0e8bf19186/lebanon-uttlesford-report.pdf
9. Forum Dvorah First Annual Gala Dinner In Honor of Mr. Leon Charney’s Legacy – YouTube, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUdWblrFWUY
10. Leon Charney’s legacy Presented by Forum Dvorah, accessed January 30, 2026, http://www.charneyresolutioncenter.com/journal/2017/1/13/leon-charneys-legacy-at-the-hilton-tel-aviv-presented-by-the-deborah-forum
11. Israel Dealmakers Summit 2012, accessed January 30, 2026, https://na.eventscloud.com/ehome/32906/59849/
12. THE BEST TECH CONFERENCES IN ISRAEL TO ATTEND IN 2021 – GKI Group, accessed January 30, 2026, https://gkigroup.com/best-tech-conferences-israel-attend-2021/
13. Asher Yahalom – Curriculum Vitae: Physics & Engineering – Studylib, accessed January 30, 2026, https://studylib.net/doc/9050825/curriculum-vitae
14. Prof. Asher Yahalom – Postdoc Israel, accessed January 30, 2026, https://postdocisrael.com/wp-content/uploads/listing-uploads/cv/2023/02/CV-Prof.-Asher-Yahalom-231222-net.pdf
15. Grapevine: the wheel deal | The Jerusalem Post, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/opinion/grapevine-the-wheel-deal-504036
16. ‘Abrahamic Business Circle’ to host first Tel Aviv event | The Jerusalem Post, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/all-news/article-723987
17. The Vista at Hilton Tel Aviv – Cruising Company, accessed January 30, 2026, https://travel-search.cruisingco.com/hotels/details/print/?clientid=228&hotel_id=11564
18. Review: The Hilton Tel Aviv – The Points Guy, accessed January 30, 2026, https://thepointsguy.com/hotel/reviews/hilton-tel-aviv/
19. Hotel Review: Hilton Tel Aviv – First Class Giraffe – WordPress.com, accessed January 30, 2026, https://firstclassgiraffe.wordpress.com/2019/11/04/hotel-review-hilton-tel-aviv/
20. CodePink Launch Campaign to Boycott Ahava | BDS Movement, accessed January 30, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/codepink-launch-campaign-boycott-ahava
21. Israel Deluxe – Select Luxury Travel, accessed January 30, 2026, https://select-luxury.travel/en/selections/private/israel-deluxe
22. EL AL | Atmosphere, accessed January 30, 2026, https://digitaler.cld.bz/atmosphere269e
23. Wineries to visit, About Israel – Inisrael.com, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.inisrael.com/main/category/israel/wineries-to-visit/
24. Open And Shut Friends And Family – Amazon S3, accessed January 30, 2026, https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.flipdocs.com/books/10001763/480638/480638.pdf
25. INJURED? – Amazon S3, accessed January 30, 2026, https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.flipdocs.com/books/10009972/208356/208356.pdf
26. Independence Park (Tel Aviv) – Wikipedia, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_Park_(Tel_Aviv)
27. Hilton Tel Aviv | Sea Views in Independence Park, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/tlvhitw-hilton-tel-aviv/
28. Israel Your Way 2022 – Jewish Federation of Greater Houston, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.houstonjewish.org/mission2022/
29. From Versailles to Jerusalem – Globes English – גלובס, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-from-versailles-to-jerusalem-1001218550
30. Hilton forecloses assets of businessman Michel Ohayon, amounting to approximately NIS 100 million | Gornitzky GNY, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.gornitzky.com/%D7%94%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%A7%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%A0%D7%9B%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%A1%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%90/
31. The Business of Apartheid – AFSC Investigate, accessed January 30, 2026, https://investigate.info/sites/default/files/attachment/Business%20of%20Apartheid%202025%20ACCA%20Report.pdf?nvep=&hmac=&emci=822b66f5-26b1-f011-8e61-6045bded8ba4&emdi=ea000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&ceid=