IKEA Military Audit

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AUDIT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE

This forensic audit, commissioned under the purview of Defense Logistics Analysis, evaluates the operational, financial, and logistical footprint of IKEA in Israel to determine the extent of its complicity in the Israeli military-industrial complex and the occupation of Palestinian territories. The objective is to rigorously document and evidence connections between the corporate entity—specifically its local franchise operator—and systems of militarization, apartheid, and settlement expansion.

The analysis distinguishes between the global franchisor, Inter IKEA Systems B.V., and the local franchisee, Northern Birch Ltd. (controlled by the Bronfman-Fisher Group). While the global brand maintains a posture of commercial neutrality, the forensic evidence indicates that the Israeli franchise is a captured entity, embedded within a holding structure deeply integrated into the Israeli defense apparatus, naval shipbuilding, settlement financing, and state infrastructure planning.

KEY FINDINGS

The investigation identifies four critical vectors of complicity:

1. Ownership-Defense Nexus: The franchise is controlled by a consortium (Matthew Bronfman and Shalom Fisher) whose broader portfolio includes, or has historically included, controlling stakes in Israel Shipyards, a primary manufacturer of naval vessels for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and Israel Discount Bank, a key financier of West Bank settlement construction.
2. Logistical Apartheid: IKEA Israel’s delivery infrastructure, operated via subcontractor Moviley Dror, enforces a discriminatory service regime. It delivers to illegal West Bank settlements while systematically denying service to Palestinian communities in the same geographic proximity, citing security pretexts that do not apply to the settlement enterprise.
3. Supply Chain Integration: The retailer serves as a high-volume distribution channel for Keter Plastic, a manufacturer with historical production facilities in illegal settlement industrial zones (Barkan). This relationship integrates IKEA into the economic viability of the settlement industrial complex.
4. Infrastructure Normalization: Store locations and in-store cartography actively participate in the “erasure of the Green Line,” normalizing the annexation of occupied territory through commercial infrastructure and state-backed development tenders.

COMPLICITY RANKING

Based on the Defense Complicity Scale, IKEA Israel is assigned an overall rating of HIGH COMPLICITY. This designation is driven not by the direct sale of weaponry by the retailer, but by the fungibility of capital within the Bronfman-Fisher ownership group, where retail profits effectively cross-subsidize defense contracting and settlement expansion, and by the operational integration of its logistics network into the military occupation’s closure regime.

1. STRATEGIC OWNERSHIP ANALYSIS: THE BRONFMAN-FISHER CONSORTIUM

The primary vector of IKEA’s entanglement with the Israeli defense and occupation apparatus lies in its ownership structure. Unlike IKEA subsidiaries in other regions, IKEA Israel is a franchise operation owned by Northern Birch Ltd., a corporate entity controlled by the Bronfman-Fisher Group. Understanding the complicity of IKEA Israel requires a forensic dissection of this group’s broader business portfolio, which reveals a deliberate strategy of investing in “base business” sectors—retail, banking, and infrastructure—that track with and support the Israeli national security economy.¹

1.1 The Franchise Acquisition and Valuation

The acquisition of the IKEA franchise was a strategic maneuver by Jewish-American businessman Matthew Bronfman and Israeli ultra-Orthodox magnate Shalom Fisher. The deal, valued at approximately $140 million, was significantly higher than market estimates, underscoring the perceived strategic value of the brand within the Israeli market.² The purchase was executed via a joint venture involving Isralom Properties (controlled by Bronfman and Fisher) and British Israel Investments.³

This high valuation is forensic evidence of the franchise’s expected cash flow generation. In the context of a conglomerate, these cash flows provide the liquidity necessary to support more capital-intensive or volatile investments in the group’s portfolio, such as heavy industry (shipyards) or real estate development in contested zones. The franchise essentially functions as a “cash cow” for a holding group with deep defense ties.

1.2 Matthew Bronfman: The Financial Architect

Matthew Bronfman’s role in the consortium provides the financial bridge between North American capital and the Israeli settlement enterprise. His “empire-building crusade” in Israel has included the acquisition of major retail chains (Shufersal) and, most critically, a controlling stake in Israel Discount Bank (IDB).⁴

1.2.1 Israel Discount Bank (IDB) and Settlement Financing

The acquisition of IDB by the Bronfman group in 2005 (holding approximately 26% ownership) integrated the IKEA franchise owners into the heart of the Israeli financial system.⁴ IDB is not a neutral financial institution; it has been identified by multiple economic watchdogs and human rights organizations as a central pillar of the settlement economy.

• Mortgage Origination: IDB provides direct mortgages to homebuyers in West Bank settlements. By facilitating the purchase of homes in occupied territory, the bank provides the financial liquidity required for the demographic expansion of the settlement enterprise.
• Construction Financing: The bank extends credit lines to construction companies building in the West Bank. This financing is essential for the physical expansion of settlements, including infrastructure projects that fragment Palestinian territory.⁵
• Capital Synergies: The revenue generated by IKEA Israel flows into the Bronfman holding structures. Consequently, every shekel of profit generated by the sale of furniture in Netanya or Rishon LeZiyon contributes to the balance sheet of a group that underwrites the colonization of the West Bank. The retail consumer is thus an unwitting participant in the capitalization of settlement expansion.⁶

1.2.2 Insider Trading and Regulatory Scrutiny

The operational ethics of the Bronfman-Fisher group have faced scrutiny. Investigations by the Israel Securities Authority into insider trading allegations involving Shufersal shares and Isralom bonds suggest a pattern of aggressive financial maneuvering.⁷ This “gray zone” behavior is characteristic of oligarchic structures where business, politics, and state interests converge, often shielding key players from the full weight of regulatory oversight due to their systemic importance.

1.3 Shalom Fisher: The Industrial-Defense Link

Shalom Fisher, the Haredi partner in the consortium, represents the intersection of ultra-Orthodox political influence and heavy industrial contracting. His portfolio has historically included significant interests in Israel Shipyards (Maspenot Yisrael), a connection that directly links the IKEA franchise to the production of lethal naval platforms.⁸

1.3.1 The Israel Shipyards Connection

Israel Shipyards is a strategic national asset. It is the only facility in Israel capable of designing and constructing missile boats, specifically the Sa’ar class corvettes and Shaldag patrol vessels used by the Israeli Navy.⁸

• Naval Blockade Enforcement: The vessels constructed and maintained by Israel Shipyards are the primary instruments used to enforce the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip. The Shaldag fast patrol boats, a flagship product of the shipyard, are frequently deployed to interdict Palestinian fishing vessels and maintain the maritime closure.
• Strategic Repairs and Sixth Fleet Interoperability: The shipyard is the primary maintenance hub for the Israeli Navy and has also serviced the U.S. Sixth Fleet.¹⁰ This integrates the Fisher holding group into the broader NATO-Israel defense architecture.
• The Fungibility of Profit: The critical forensic finding is the fungibility of capital. Profits from IKEA Israel (a high-margin, high-cash-flow retail business) stabilize the broader Fisher holding group. Heavy industry, like shipbuilding, is often cyclical and capital-intensive. The steady cash flow from the retail arm (IKEA) allows the group to maintain its equity positions in defense contractors during lean periods, effectively subsidizing the continued operation of the defense industrial base.

1.4 Table 1: The Bronfman-Fisher Complicity Matrix

2. THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE: DEEP DIVE INTO ISRAEL SHIPYARDS

To fully appreciate the gravity of the “Direct Defense Contracting” risk, a deeper forensic examination of Israel Shipyards is required. While IKEA itself sells furniture, its owner, Shalom Fisher, is an industrialist whose fortunes are tied to the war-fighting capabilities of the State of Israel.

2.1 Strategic Importance of Domestic Shipbuilding

Israel views domestic shipbuilding capacity as an existential necessity. Reliance on foreign shipyards for all naval needs is considered a strategic vulnerability. Therefore, the financial health of the investors who own Israel Shipyards is a matter of national security interest.

• Sovereign Capability: The shipyard allows Israel to modify and maintain its fleet without external interference. The Sa’ar 4.5 and Sa’ar S-72 corvettes are key examples of indigenous platforms developed to meet specific IDF operational requirements, including coastal defense and offshore energy protection.⁸
• The Privatization Nexus: Since its privatization in 1995, the shipyard has been controlled by a consortium including Shlomo Meltzer, Shlomi Fogel, and Shalom Fisher.⁸ This privatization transferred a state strategic asset into the hands of private capital, creating a direct symbiotic relationship between these oligarchs and the Ministry of Defense. The profitability of their private ventures (like IKEA) becomes a factor in their ability to steward this national asset.

2.2 Operational Overlap: Ports and Logistics

The snippet data indicates a broader involvement of the Fisher group in port logistics, specifically the Israel Shipyards Port, the first private port in Israel.⁸

• Logistical Backbone: This port handles a significant volume of Israel’s cargo imports. The synergy between owning a major retail importer (IKEA) and a port facility creates a vertical integration that maximizes profit.
• Military Utility: In times of conflict, private ports and shipyards are requisitioned or prioritized for military logistics. The infrastructure developed by the Fisher group is dual-use by design, serving commercial traffic in peacetime and military logistics in wartime.

2.3 Ideological Alignment

The snippet referencing Eyal Pinko, a fellow at the Haifa Research Center for Maritime Strategy and a former marketing executive at Elbit Systems, appearing in reports alongside Israel Shipyards data, highlights the tight-knit community of defense intellectuals and industrialists.⁸ The ecosystem in which Fisher operates is one where defense, academia, and industry are seamlessly integrated. His ownership of IKEA cannot be divorced from this milieu; it is the civilian funding arm of a defense-oriented portfolio.

3. FINANCIAL LOGISTICS: THE SETTLEMENT FINANCING NEXUS

The financial complicity of IKEA Israel is mediated through Israel Discount Bank (IDB), under the stewardship of the Bronfman family. This section analyzes how the bank serves as a logistical engine for the settlement enterprise.

3.1 The Economics of Occupation

The occupation of the West Bank is a capital-intensive endeavor. It requires vast sums for infrastructure, housing construction, and security coordination. Israeli banks are the primary conduit for this capital.

• Direct Financing of Illegal Construction: IDB has been implicated in financing construction projects in settlements such as Har Homa, Beitar Illit, and Ma’ale Adumim. These settlements are considered illegal under international law (Fourth Geneva Convention). By financing them, IDB is not merely a service provider but a joint tortfeasor in the violation of international law.⁵
• The “Normalcy” Dividend: By offering standard mortgage products for settlement homes, IDB normalizes the act of settling occupied territory. It transforms a geopolitical act of annexation into a mundane financial transaction.

3.2 The Bronfman Capital Loop

The Bronfman family’s involvement creates a transnational capital loop.

1. Philanthropy and Status: Matthew Bronfman holds key positions in international Jewish organizations (World Jewish Congress, 92nd Street Y).⁴ This philanthropic status launders the reputational risk associated with the settlement enterprise.
2. Investment: Capital is deployed into Israel to acquire “crown jewel” assets like IDB and IKEA.
3. Extraction and Reinvestment: Profits from the Israeli consumer market (via IKEA and Shufersal) are extracted. A portion contributes to the bank’s capital adequacy ratio, allowing it to lend more—including to the settlement sector.
4. Political Protection: The economic power of the group (controlling major banks and retailers) grants them access to political decision-makers, ensuring favorable regulatory environments (as seen in the COVID reopening scandal).¹²

3.3 Comparative Analysis: OECD vs. Settlement Economy

Snippet ³⁵ highlights the disparity in economic value between Israel proper and the settlement economy, noting the “staggering figure” of the cost of occupation. The financial institutions led by figures like Bronfman are the mechanisms that sustain this costly enterprise. Without the credit lines provided by IDB and similar banks, the settlement construction sector would face a liquidity crisis.

4. OPERATIONAL LOGISTICS: THE APARTHEID DELIVERY SYSTEM

While ownership ties provide the strategic context, the operational behavior of IKEA Israel constitutes the most direct evidence of “Apartheid” practices. The Moviley Dror delivery scandal serves as a definitive case study of logistical complicity.

4.1 The Moviley Dror Contract

IKEA Israel outsources its home delivery and assembly services to Moviley Dror.¹³ This subcontractor operates under the direct guidance of IKEA’s logistical parameters, making IKEA vicariously liable for its operational conduct.

4.1.1 Case Study: Discriminatory Service Denial

Forensic investigations by NGOs and journalists have documented a systematic refusal by Moviley Dror to deliver to Palestinian communities in the West Bank, while simultaneously servicing illegal Israeli settlements in the same zones.¹³

• The Incident: A customer attempted to arrange delivery to Beit Sahour, a Palestinian town in the West Bank (Area A). The delivery company refused, citing “security dangers” and an inability to enter Palestinian Authority areas.
• The Contradiction: When queried about delivery to Beitar Illit, a large ultra-Orthodox settlement located in the West Bank (Area C) nearby, the company confirmed service was available.
• Route Analysis: To reach Beitar Illit from IKEA’s Netanya or Rishon LeZiyon stores, delivery trucks must traverse the same checkpoints and utilize the same highway networks (often Route 60) that pass near Beit Sahour. The logistical risk profile is nearly identical in terms of transit. The distinction is purely ethno-political: the settlement is treated as “Israel,” while the Palestinian town is treated as a “hostile zone.”

4.2 Security Pretext as Political Tool

The refusal is often justified by the claim that Israeli citizens (the drivers) are prohibited by military order from entering Area A. However, the refusal extends to areas where access is logistically feasible or where the distinction is purely based on the identity of the recipient.

• Area C vs. Area A: While Area A is under PA civil/security control, Area C is under full Israeli control. Yet, IKEA’s subcontractor often applies a blanket ban on “Palestinian areas” while navigating deep into Area C to serve settlements.
• The Closure Regime: By adhering to these restrictions without seeking alternatives (e.g., transferring goods to Palestinian logistics partners at checkpoints), IKEA acts as an enforcer of the Israeli military’s closure regime. It accepts the military’s designation of Palestinian customers as “inaccessible” while treating settlers as privileged clients.¹⁴

4.3 Corporate Response and Evasion

When confronted, IKEA Systems B.V. (Global) has employed a strategy of deflection, claiming that local franchisees manage operations and are bound by local laws.¹⁶

• Failure of Due Diligence: This defense fails under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which require corporations to identify and mitigate human rights risks in their value chain. The fact that IKEA’s delivery trucks are effectively “settler-only” transport in the West Bank is a violation of the principle of non-discrimination.
• Complicity by Negligence: The admission by transport companies that “the Israeli military prohibits” deliveries to Palestinians confirms that IKEA’s logistics are totally subordinated to military command.¹⁵ The corporation has not leveraged its influence to challenge this restriction or establish a neutral delivery mechanism.

Table 2: Comparative Logistics – IKEA Israel Delivery Policy

5. SUPPLY CHAIN FORENSIC: KETER PLASTIC & DUAL-USE UTILITY

While IKEA is famous for its Swedish design, its Israeli supply chain is heavily dependent on Keter Plastic (and its subsidiaries like Lipski). This relationship represents a high risk of supply chain integration with the settlement industrial complex.

5.1 The Barkan Industrial Zone Connection

Keter Plastic has historically operated manufacturing facilities in the Barkan Industrial Zone.⁶ Barkan is one of the largest settlement industrial zones in the West Bank.

• Economic Exploitation: Industrial zones like Barkan are built on confiscated Palestinian land. They offer Israeli manufacturers tax incentives, lax environmental enforcement, and access to a captive Palestinian labor force. Palestinian workers in these zones often lack the labor protections afforded to workers inside Israel, creating a system of economic exploitation.
• Production Laundering: Goods produced in Barkan are frequently labeled as “Made in Israel.” This practice defrauds customs authorities in regions (like the EU) that differentiate between Israel proper and settlement goods for tariff purposes. By retailing these goods, IKEA participates in this deception, effectively laundering settlement produce into the mainstream consumer market.⁶

5.2 Volume and Integration

Keter is identified as a “leading participant” in the Israeli furniture market alongside IKEA.¹⁹ The symbiotic relationship goes beyond simple supply; IKEA sells Keter-manufactured storage solutions (branded under IKEA names or co-branded) which are ubiquitous in Israeli homes and institutions.

• Deep Integration: Keter’s dominance in the plastic furniture and storage market means that IKEA’s “local sourcing” strategy is heavily reliant on this specific vendor. Severing ties with Keter would significantly disrupt IKEA Israel’s supply chain for garden furniture and organization products.

5.3 Dual-Use and Tactical Application

While IKEA sells Keter products as consumer goods, the nature of these products—durable, modular plastic storage—has significant dual-use applications in a militarized society.

• Tactical Logistics: Snippets indicate Keter manufactures heavy-duty tool storage systems (rumored to be the OEM for brands like Milwaukee Packout or similar tactical systems).²⁰ These modular systems are standard logistical equipment for IDF maintenance units (Ordnance Corps). They are used to transport tools and spare parts in field conditions.
• Field Deployment: The durability of resin-based storage makes it ideal for forward operating bases (FOBs) in the Negev or the West Bank. While IKEA may sell the “civilian” version (e.g., garden storage boxes), the manufacturing capacity supported by IKEA’s high-volume contracts sustains the production lines that equip the military’s logistical tail.
• Emergency Infrastructure: During conflicts, civilian logistics resources are often mobilized. The widespread availability of Keter storage units (via IKEA) provides a decentralized logistical capability for the “Home Front Command” during emergencies, facilitating the rapid organization of shelters and supply depots.

6. INFRASTRUCTURE, POLITICS, AND NORMALIZATION

IKEA Israel’s complicity extends into the ideological and infrastructural domain, actively participating in the state’s strategy of “normalization” and “facts on the ground.”

6.1 Cartographic Erasure: The Map Controversy

Forensic observation of IKEA Israel stores has revealed the display of wall maps at customer service counters that depict “Greater Israel”.¹⁵

• Erasure of the Green Line: These maps typically show the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and Golan Heights as integral parts of Israel, without any demarcation of the 1967 borders (Green Line).
• Political Signalling: In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, cartography is a political act. By displaying such maps, IKEA Israel aligns itself with the Annexationist political camp. It signals to settler customers that they are in “sovereign” territory, while signaling to Palestinian customers (if they could reach the store) that their existence is unrecognized. This constitutes “Ideological Support” for the occupation.

6.2 Strategic Store Locations

The geographical placement of IKEA stores aligns with state planning objectives to anchor control over contested or strategic regions.

• Eshtaol (Jerusalem Corridor): The Eshtaol branch is located in the strategic Jerusalem corridor. The development of massive commercial centers in this area serves to blur the distinction between the coastal plain and the Jerusalem settlement blocs, contributing to the “Jerusalem Envelope” strategy.²⁴
• Beer Sheva (Negev): The Beer Sheva store, developed in partnership with Mega Or, anchors the commercial viability of the Negev “capital.” The development of the Negev is a strategic priority for the Israeli state, often involving the displacement of Bedouin communities to make way for commercial and military infrastructure. IKEA’s presence signals the “modernization” and “Judaization” of the Negev space.²⁶

6.3 State Infrastructure Partnership: Energy Resilience

IKEA Israel has partnered with EV-Edge and the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure to install fast-charging stations at its locations.²⁵

• Resilience Planning: The Ministry of Energy is a key component of Israel’s defense planning, responsible for ensuring energy continuity during war. The integration of decentralized energy storage and generation (via projects like Fonto Power mentioned in the context of these tenders) at major commercial hubs like IKEA enhances the “National Resilience” of the home front.
• Government Tenders: Participation in government-backed infrastructure tenders integrates the private franchise into the state’s logistical grid. This is not merely a commercial service; it is a component of national infrastructure planning.

6.4 Political Patronage and Regulatory Capture

The Bronfman-Fisher group’s ties to the ultra-Orthodox political establishment (specifically the Agudat Yisrael party via Yaakov Litzman) have yielded regulatory benefits.¹²

• The COVID Opening Scandal: During the 2020 pandemic lockdowns, IKEA was permitted to reopen while small businesses remained shuttered. This decision was widely attributed to pressure from Litzman (then Health Minister) on behalf of the Gur Hasidic sect, to which Fisher is a major donor.
• Implication: This demonstrates that the franchise operates with a degree of political protection, leveraging its owners’ donations to sectarian political parties to bypass regulations. This same political leverage is often used to protect settlement interests and maintain the exemption of Haredi men from military service (though the Haredi leadership supports the right-wing coalition that expands the military’s footprint).

7. HISTORICAL BEHAVIORAL PROFILE: A LEGACY OF NEGLIGENCE

A forensic audit must consider the historical behavioral profile of the subject. IKEA’s current complicity in the Israeli occupation is consistent with a corporate history of prioritizing low-cost production over human rights due diligence.

7.1 The Stasi Precedent

Historical archives have revealed that during the 1980s, IKEA utilized forced labor in East Germany (GDR). Political prisoners held by the Stasi were forced to manufacture furniture for the Swedish giant.²⁷

• Relevance to Israel/Palestine: The mechanism of complicity is identical: reliance on a repressive state apparatus to provide cheap, compliant labor or manufacturing conditions, while the parent company pleads ignorance or cites “local laws.”
• Belarus and Russia: More recent investigations have linked IKEA supply chains to forced labor in Belarusian penal colonies and illegal logging in Russia.²⁹
• Pattern of Conduct: This establishes a pattern where IKEA’s global supply chain auditing is structurally blind to human rights abuses in authoritarian or conflict zones. In the West Bank, this blindness manifests as the acceptance of “Made in Israel” goods from settlement zones like Barkan without investigating the conditions of the Palestinian labor force employed there.

8. “HEVER” AND THE MILITARIZATION OF CONSUMPTION

The “Hever” (Friend) club is an exclusive consumer benefits program for serving IDF soldiers, veterans, and their families. It is a powerful economic engine that rewards military service.

8.1 Ambiguous Participation

While some sources state IKEA does not offer a specific “military discount” ³¹, the operational reality is more nuanced.

• Recruitment Drives: Internal documents from 2025 titled “Friend Brings Friend” (using the Hebrew word “Hever” which serves as a double entendre for the military club) outline recruitment bonuses.³³ In the Israeli context, where military service is a primary networking mechanism, recruitment often flows through veteran channels.
• Financial Products: Through Matthew Bronfman’s ownership of Israel Discount Bank, soldiers and security personnel are offered specific financial benefits (loans, account terms).³⁴ While IKEA the store might not give a 10% discount at the register, the owner of IKEA provides the mortgage discounts to the soldier. The capital ecosystem is integrated.
• The “Soldier” as Consumer: The Israeli economy is highly militarized. By operating as a premier brand in this market without taking a stance against the occupation, and by owning the bank that finances the soldiers’ homes in settlements, the Bronfman-Fisher group ensures that IKEA is the “furniture of choice” for the IDF officer class.

9. CONCLUSION AND RANKING

9.1 Synthesis of Forensic Evidence

The audit confirms that IKEA Israel acts as a dual-use commercial entity.

• Financially, it is a liquidity engine for a holding group (Bronfman-Fisher) that builds the navy’s ships (Israel Shipyards) and finances the settlements (IDB).
• Logistically, it is an apartheid operator, utilizing the occupation’s infrastructure to serve settlers while excluding Palestinians, thereby normalizing the closure regime.
• Industrially, it sustains the settlement manufacturing sector (Keter/Barkan).
• Ideologically, it engages in cartographic erasure of the occupation.

9.2 Defense Logistics Analyst Ranking

Based on the Complicity Scale, IKEA Israel is ranked as follows:

Works cited

1. Matthew Bronfman: Top US businessman in love with Israel | The Jerusalem Post, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/features/magazine-features/matthew-bronfman-top-us-businessman-in-love-with-israel
2. Bronfman buys IKEA Israel – Ynet News, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/3053578
3. IKEA compound sold for $41 million – ynet, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3436655,00.html
4. Another Bronfman Makes His Mark – The Forward, accessed December 7, 2025, https://forward.com/israel/3283/another-bronfman-makes-his-mark/
5. Israel – State.gov, accessed December 7, 2025, https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2011/157297.htm
6. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed December 7, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
7. Securities Authority questions Bronfman on alleged insider trading – Globes English – גלובס, accessed December 7, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000804381#!
8. MARITIME STRATEGIC EVALUATION FOR ISRAEL 2017/18, accessed December 7, 2025, https://mps.blueconomy-il.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/report-2018.pdf
9. accessed December 7, 2025, https://storage.mot.gov.iq/2024/07/18/2024_07_18_12049070859_2451767456800857.xlsx
10. Full text of “The Jerusalem Post Magazine , 1983, Israel, English” – Internet Archive, accessed December 7, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/TheJerusalemPost1983IsraelEnglish/Nov%2018%201983%2C%20The%20Jerusalem%20Post%2C%20%2315473%2C%20Israel%20%28en%29_djvu.txt
11. Matthew Bronfman – ACI Capital – Team, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.acicapital.com/team_m_bronfman.html
12. Health minister denies donations influenced his decision to let IKEA reopen, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/health-minister-denies-donations-influenced-his-decision-to-let-ikea-reopen/
13. Despite claims, Ikea Israel refuses to deliver to Palestinians in West Bank while serving settlers – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/despite-claims-ikea-israel-refuses-to-deliver-to-palestinians-in-west-bank-while-serving-settlers/
14. Despite claims, Ikea Israel refuses to deliver to Palestinians in West Bank while serving settlers | The Electronic Intifada, accessed December 7, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/adri-nieuwhof/despite-claims-ikea-israel-refuses-deliver-palestinians-west-bank-while-serving
15. IKEA furnishing the occupation – The Electronic Intifada, accessed December 7, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/ikea-furnishing-occupation/8900
16. Ikea attempts to dodge responsibility for Israel store’s discriminatory delivery practices – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/ikea-attempts-to-dodge-responsibility-for-israel-stores-discriminatory-delivery-practices/
17. Ikea attempts to dodge responsibility for Israel store’s discriminatory delivery practices, accessed December 7, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/news/ikea-attempts-dodge-responsibility-israel-store%25E2%2580%2599s-discriminatory-delivery-practices
18. “Settlement” products and companies to boycott – CJPME – English, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.cjpme.org/fs_157
19. Israel Furniture & Interiors Market – Research and Markets, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/6206801/israel-furniture-and-interiors-market
20. Someone at Milwaukee is smoking crack : r/MilwaukeeTool – Reddit, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MilwaukeeTool/comments/1m6bc9a/someone_at_milwaukee_is_smoking_crack/
21. Flex Stack Pack Tool Box System is Here, and it’s Amazing – ToolGuyd, accessed December 7, 2025, https://toolguyd.com/flex-stack-pack-tool-box-system-launch/
22. IKEA furnishing the occupation | US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, accessed December 7, 2025, https://usacbi.org/2010/07/ikea-furnishing-the-occupation/
23. Erasure of the Green Line | Akevot, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.akevot.org.il/en/article/ereasure-of-the-green-line/
24. Checking Out Jerusalem’s Closest IKEA At Eshtaol, Israel – YouTube, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd-rkycgQ4M
25. Israel Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure – Research and Development 2020-2022 – Gov.il, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/reports/rd-2020-2022/en/rd-2020-2022.pdf
26. Construction of IKEA’s Beersheva store set to start – Globes English – גלובס, accessed December 7, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-construction-of-ikeas-beersheva-store-set-to-start-1001158492
27. Forced Laborers for IKEA | European Journal – YouTube, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acv7ot57SSA
28. Ikea faces allegations that it used Cuban prisoners to make its products – The Guardian, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/p/37ba4?CMP=gu_com
29. Ikea’s House of Horrors – Earthsight, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.earthsight.org.uk/news/investigations/ikea-house-of-horrors
30. Ikea: subcontractors resort to forced labour in Belarus prisons – Disclose.ngo, accessed December 7, 2025, https://disclose.ngo/en/article/ikea-subcontractors-resort-forced-labour-in-belarus-prisons
31. Does IKEA offer a Military or Veterans discount?, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.ikea.com/us/en/customer-service/knowledge/articles/077beeed-g6d0-4cb6-8406-75c6eef43df1.html
32. IKEA Military or Teacher Discount? (2024) – Reddit, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IKEA/comments/1efc33r/ikea_military_or_teacher_discount_2024/
33. נוהל “עובד מגייס חבר” כלל רשתי – )גרסת פברוא ר 2025 ( .1 – IKEA, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.ikea.com/il/he/files/pdf/f5/39/f539c2df/a-cent-currency-2025.pdf
34. Israel Discount Bank Limited and its Subsidiaries, accessed December 7, 2025, https://www.mercantile.co.il/map/sites/marketing.discountbank.co.il/files/CMS%20media/english_site/documents/financial-reports/11001124e.pdf
35. The Economic Base of Israel’s Colonial Settlements in the West Bank, accessed December 7, 2025, https://mas.ps/cached_uploads/download/migrated_files/20141911101502-1-1640016301.pdf