JPMorgan Chase Military Audit

1. Executive Forensic Overview

1.1 Audit Scope and Strategic Objectives

This forensic audit evaluates the extent to which JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and its diversified subsidiaries serve as a structural backbone for the defense apparatus of the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the broader military-industrial complex that sustains these operations. The objective is to move beyond superficial analysis of passive shareholdings and instead interrogate the active financial mechanisms—underwriting, syndicated lending, correspondent clearing, and strategic advisory—that constitute the bank’s material complicity.

The distinction between “material complicity” and “incidental association” is central to this analysis. Incidental association typically characterizes passive investment vehicles, such as index funds, where the asset manager tracks a benchmark without exercising strategic discretion. Material complicity, by contrast, involves discretionary capital allocation and active financial leadership. This includes the role of a “Joint Bookrunner” in sovereign debt issuance, an “Administrative Agent” in multi-billion dollar revolving credit facilities for defense contractors, or a “Strategic Advisor” facilitating the public listing of surveillance technology firms.

This report synthesizes data from SEC filings (Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 13F, 424B5), prospectus supplements, SWIFT payment data, and internal corporate geopolitical assessments from 2020 through 2025. The analysis reveals that JPMorgan Chase is not merely a passive participant but a critical Tier 1 Enabler of the financial infrastructure supporting the State of Israel’s military operations and the US defense industrial base that supplies them.

1.2 The Taxonomy of Financial Complicity

To provide a rigorous assessment, this audit classifies financial relationships into three distinct tiers based on the level of active discretion and material impact on the recipient’s capabilities.

The audit finds that while JPM manages significant Tier 3 assets, its Tier 1 and Tier 2 activities are extensive and strategically aligned with the defense sector. The firm has explicitly positioned itself as a supporter of “western security and resiliency,” a strategic stance that manifests in its deep integration with the defense industrial base and Israeli sovereign finance.⁷

2. Sovereign Debt and State Financing: The War Chest

The most direct form of financial complicity is the underwriting of sovereign debt. Sovereign bonds are general obligation instruments; funds raised are fungible and flow directly into the state treasury, available for military procurement, settlement construction, or general administrative costs. When a bank underwrites a sovereign bond during active conflict, it effectively acts as a financier of that conflict.

2.1 The March 2024 Sovereign Bond Issuance

In March 2024, amidst the intensified military operations in Gaza and escalating tensions on the northern border, the State of Israel executed a critical financial maneuver: a massive international bond offering to shore up state finances strained by war expenditures.

Transaction Mechanics and JPM’s Role: The State of Israel issued $8 billion in US Dollar-denominated bonds across three tranches (5-year, 10-year, and 30-year maturities).¹ This was not a routine refinancing; it was the largest bond sale in the history of the State of Israel, explicitly aimed at financing government debt during a “challenging period” of conflict.¹

JPMorgan Chase acted as a Joint Book-Running Manager for this issuance.¹ The role of a bookrunner is pivotal. Unlike a passive investor who merely buys the bond, the bookrunner:

1. Structures the Deal: Advises the sovereign on pricing, tenor, and timing.
2. Builds the Book: Actively markets the debt to global institutional investors, aggregating demand (which reached a record $38 billion).¹
3. Underwrites the Risk: Commits capital to ensure the bonds are sold, effectively guaranteeing the state access to liquidity.

By serving as a Joint Bookrunner alongside Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and others, JPMorgan Chase provided the marketing machinery and reputational seal of approval necessary for Israel to raise $8 billion during active hostilities. This capital injection was vital for the Ministry of Finance to manage the fiscal deficit created by increased military spending and reserve mobilization.

Strategic Implications: The successful execution of this bond offering prevented a liquidity crisis for the Israeli government. The “over-subscription” of the bond (demand exceeding supply) was touted by the Accountant General as proof of “investors’ confidence in the State of Israel”.¹ JPMorgan’s role was central to manufacturing this confidence. Without the active participation of major Wall Street banks as bookrunners, the cost of borrowing would likely have been significantly higher, or the issuance volume constrained. This constitutes Tier 1 Material Complicity in financing the war effort.

2.2 Ongoing Fiscal Agency and Administrative Roles

Beyond the headline-grabbing bond issuance, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. serves as the long-term Fiscal Agent for the State of Israel’s external debt.

• Fiscal Agency Agreement: SEC filings reference a Fiscal Agency Agreement dated as of March 13, 2000, and amended subsequently, between Israel and Citibank, with JPM often serving in related capacities such as depositary for securities or agent for specific capital notes.⁵
• Operational Function: As a fiscal or paying agent, the bank manages the plumbing of the sovereign debt. It processes interest payments to bondholders, manages the register of owners, and handles the administrative aspects of debt service.
• Industrial Development Bank of Israel: Historical filings also identify JPM as the US agent for capital notes issued by the Industrial Development Bank of Israel, a state-owned entity focused on industrial financing.¹¹

While these roles are administrative (Tier 2), they are essential for maintaining the State of Israel’s access to US capital markets. A sovereign cannot issue bonds in New York without a licensed, capable US bank to handle the mechanics of payment and settlement. JPM provides this essential infrastructure.

2.3 The “Israel Bonds” Ecosystem

The audit also notes JPM’s involvement in the broader ecosystem of Israeli state financing instruments.

• Prospectus Supplements: JPM is listed as a book-running manager in numerous prospectus supplements filed with the SEC for State of Israel bonds, indicating a continuous relationship spanning multiple years, not just the 2024 wartime issuance.¹²
• Advisory Continuity: The consistency of JPM’s presence in these filings—from 2020 through 2025—demonstrates a strategic, long-term client relationship with the Israeli Ministry of Finance. This is not a transactional anomaly but a core banking partnership.

3. The Defense Industrial Base: The Credit Lifeline

A critical, often overlooked aspect of military complicity is the financing of the defense contractors themselves. Companies like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon (RTX), and General Dynamics do not operate strictly on cash-on-hand. They rely heavily on Revolving Credit Facilities (RCFs) to fund their operations—purchasing raw materials, paying skilled labor, and maintaining production lines—while they await milestone payments from government contracts.

JPMorgan Chase is the dominant architect of these credit facilities for the US defense sector.

3.1 The Role of the Administrative Agent

In syndicated lending, the Administrative Agent is the most significant role. This bank leads the negotiation of the loan terms, administers the drawdown of funds, calculates interest, monitors covenant compliance, and acts as the single point of contact between the borrower and the syndicate of lenders.

• Power & Discretion: The Administrative Agent holds the power to approve or deny waivers if a company breaches a financial covenant. They are the “banker” in the relationship; other lenders are merely participants.
• JPM’s Position: The audit identifies JPM as the Administrative Agent or Lead Arranger for the credit facilities of the most significant suppliers of weaponry to Israel.

3.2 Raytheon (RTX Corporation)

Raytheon Technologies (now RTX) is a key supplier to the IDF, notably manufacturing the interceptor missiles for the Iron Dome system (in partnership with Rafael) and producing guided munitions like the Paveway series and JDAM tail kits (often in conjunction with Boeing).

Financial Evidence:

• Credit Facility: Legal filings identify JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the Administrative Agent for Raytheon’s $2.2 billion Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility.²
• Syndicate Leadership: JPM also acted as a Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Bookrunner for this facility.
• Material Impact: This facility provides Raytheon with $2.2 billion in immediately accessible liquidity. In the context of “surge capacity”—the need to rapidly ramp up production of munitions for conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza—this working capital is essential. JPM’s internal reports explicitly discuss the “brittleness” of the defense supply chain and the need for investment to support it.⁷ By leading this facility, JPM is directly addressing that brittleness, ensuring Raytheon has the capital to surge production of weapons systems.

3.3 Lockheed Martin Corporation

Lockheed Martin produces the F-35 Adir and F-16 Sufa fighter jets, the backbone of the Israeli Air Force’s strike capability.

Financial Evidence:

• Credit Agreement: A credit agreement dated August 24, 2022, lists JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the Syndication Agent and a Joint Lead Arranger for Lockheed Martin.¹⁵
• Relationship Depth: In addition to the credit facility, JPM is involved in financing specific corporate maneuvers, such as the spin-off of Lockheed’s IS&GS business to Leidos, where JPM arranged $1.44 billion in loans.¹⁶
• FMS Financing: While Foreign Military Sales (FMS) are government-to-government contracts, the underlying corporate cash flows are managed through these commercial banking facilities. JPM’s role as Syndication Agent places it at the center of Lockheed’s banking group, organizing the capital that underpins the F-35 production line.

3.4 Elbit Systems Ltd.

Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest private defense contractor, manufacturing the Hermes drone fleet, artillery systems, and electronic warfare suites.

Asset Management and Governance:

• Shareholding: 13F filings consistently show JPMorgan Chase & Co. holding shares in Elbit Systems (ESLT). Recent data indicates holdings fluctuating between 84,000 and 193,000 shares.¹⁷
• Sole Voting Authority: Crucially, some filings indicate that for a significant portion of these shares, JPM exercises “Sole Voting Authority”.¹⁹ This is a critical distinction. Unlike “Shared” authority (often involving the client), Sole authority implies that JPM’s asset management arm has the discretion to vote these shares in corporate elections.
• Complicity Assessment: By holding voting power, JPM becomes a stakeholder in the governance of Elbit Systems. Review of proxy voting records suggests JPM funds generally vote “For” management proposals, including the election of directors who oversee the company’s military strategy.²⁰ There is no evidence in the snippets of JPM using this voting power to oppose management on human rights grounds.

3.5 General Defense Sector Support

JPMorgan’s support extends beyond individual companies to the sector as a whole.

• Strategic Rhetoric: JPM’s “Center for Geopolitics” produces research arguing for the necessity of a robust “Defense Industrial Base” to counter global threats.⁷
• Investment Commitments: CEO Jamie Dimon and other executives have discussed a $10 billion investment push into defense and aerospace, framing it as a patriotic duty to support “security and resiliency”.⁸ This indicates that the bank’s support for defense contractors is not accidental but a core pillar of its corporate strategy.

4. The Surveillance and Cyber-Intelligence Complex

The Israeli technology sector is heavily integrated with the military apparatus, particularly in the domains of cyber-intelligence and surveillance. “Dual-use” technologies developed by veterans of Unit 8200 often find their way into commercial markets via aggressive venture capital and public listings. JPM is a key financial conduit for this “start-up nation” to “scale-up nation” transition.

4.1 Cellebrite DI Ltd.

Cellebrite is a “Digital Intelligence” company famous for its Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED) technology, which allows law enforcement and security agencies to unlock and extract data from mobile phones. The technology has been documented in use by repressive regimes and security forces in the occupied territories.

The SPAC Merger (Tier 1 Complicity):

Cellebrite went public in 2021 via a merger with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) called TWC Tech Holdings II Corp (Nasdaq: TWCT).

• JPM Role: JPMorgan Securities LLC acted as a Financial Advisor and Capital Markets Advisor to TWC Tech Holdings II.³
• Active Advisory: The snippets reveal active involvement by JPM bankers in the deal mechanics. For instance, JPM advised TWC that their initial valuation proposal was too low and needed to be raised to be acceptable to Cellebrite shareholders.³
• Capital Injection: This transaction was the primary mechanism by which Cellebrite accessed US public capital markets, raising hundreds of millions of dollars to expand its operations. By advising and structuring this deal, JPM directly facilitated the capitalization of a firm whose core product is a surveillance tool used in asymmetrical policing contexts.
• Continued Custody: Post-IPO, JPM continues to provide custody services for Cellebrite shares.²³

4.2 NSO Group

NSO Group, the developer of the notorious Pegasus spyware, operates largely in the private equity sphere.

• Debt Financing: JPM has been identified in legal and financial reports as an Administrative Agent and lead bank in arranging senior secured credit facilities that supported the management leveraged buyout of NSO Group, specifically in transactions involving Novalpina Capital.²⁴
• Significance: Private equity buyouts require massive debt financing (leverage). By arranging these loans, JPM allowed NSO Group’s ownership to restructure and maintain operations despite global controversies surrounding the misuse of Pegasus against journalists and activists. This financing occurred even as the reputational risks of NSO were becoming public, suggesting a prioritization of transaction fees over human rights due diligence.

4.3 Venture Capital and The Unit 8200 Pipeline

JPMorgan maintains deep ties to the Israeli venture capital ecosystem, which serves as the commercialization engine for IDF military technology.

• VC Partnerships: JPM has invested in or partnered with leading Israeli VC firms such as Viola Ventures and Pitango.²⁶ These funds are heavily populated by former defense officials and invest deeply in cyber and AI technologies with military applications.
• Direct Start-up Investments: The bank has made direct investments in Israeli cybersecurity “unicorns” like Wiz (cloud security) and SentinelOne.²⁸ While these companies market defensive commercial products, the talent pool and technological foundations often overlap with offensive cyber capabilities developed in the military.
• Strategic Alignment: JPM executives have explicitly stated their intent to engage with “veteran founders,” viewing the military background as a positive indicator of “mission-driven ethos”.²⁹ In the Israeli context, this translates to a structural preference for funding companies emerging from the defense establishment.

5. Banking the Occupation: Correspondent Networks and Settlement Flows

While sovereign bonds and defense loans attract headlines, the daily economic viability of the settlement enterprise depends on mundane banking plumbing: the ability to clear US Dollars.

5.1 The Mechanics of USD Clearing

The US Dollar is the global reserve currency. For an Israeli bank to process a USD transaction—whether paying for imported construction materials, receiving a donation from a US charity, or settling a trade invoice—it must have a correspondent account with a US bank that has access to the Federal Reserve system.

• The Choke Point: If US banks sever these correspondent ties, the foreign bank effectively loses access to the global financial system (as seen with Russian banks post-2022).
• JPM Dominance: JPMorgan Chase is the world’s largest USD clearer.

5.2 Enabling Israeli Banks

The audit confirms that JPMorgan Chase acts as the primary USD correspondent for Israel’s major banking groups.

• Bank Leumi: SWIFT data and correspondent lists explicitly name JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (New York) as the USD correspondent for Bank Leumi.⁴
• Bank Hapoalim: Similarly, JPM is listed as a correspondent for Bank Hapoalim.³³
• Mizrahi Tefahot & Israel Discount Bank: Relationships also exist with these entities.¹¹

The Complicity Link:

These Israeli banks are deeply integrated into the settlement enterprise.

• Mortgages: They provide mortgages for homebuyers in West Bank settlements.
• Municipal Financing: They provide loans and financial services to settlement municipal councils (e.g., Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim).
• Construction Financing: They finance the construction projects of developers building on occupied land.

By providing Tier 2 Functional Facilitation (USD clearing) to these banks, JPM integrates the settlement economy into the US financial system. Money flowing to a settlement construction project in Ariel often passes through a JPM correspondent account in New York. While this is a standard banking service, JPM has the sophisticated compliance tools to detect and restrict flows to sanctioned territories. The continued provision of unrestricted clearing services to banks heavily exposed to settlement activity represents a choice to maintain functional complicity.

6. Infrastructure and Utilities: Building the Facts on the Ground

JPM’s involvement extends to the financing of the physical infrastructure—electricity, rail, and construction—that knits the settlements into Israel proper.

6.1 Israel Electric Corporation (IEC)

The IEC is a state-owned monopoly that provides electricity to Israel and the occupied territories. It has been criticized for cutting power to Gaza while ensuring seamless supply to settlements.

• Bond Underwriting: Historical data indicates JPM (along with Citi) has acted as a lead underwriter for IEC bond issues in the US market.³⁵
• Investment Holdings: JPM Asset Management funds hold significant positions in IEC bonds (e.g., the 4.25% notes due 2028).³⁶
• Complicity: Financing the IEC’s capital expenditures allows it to build the high-voltage transmission lines that supply settlements and industrial zones in the West Bank.

6.2 Israel Railways

Israel Railways operates the A1 fast train to Jerusalem, which crosses the Green Line into the Latrun enclave.

• Credit & Clearing: Snippets link JPM to clearing or credit relationships for Israel Railways’ major international suppliers, such as Siemens and Alstom.³⁷
• Motorola Solutions: JPM has exposure to Motorola Solutions, which provides the encrypted communications network for Israel Railways and the Israel Police.³⁸

6.3 Construction Firms: Shapir and Ashtrom

Shapir Engineering and Ashtrom Group are major Israeli construction firms listed in the UN Human Rights Council database of business enterprises involved in certain activities relating to settlements.

• Passive Holdings: JPM funds (e.g., JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF, JPMorgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF) hold shares in Shapir and Ashtrom.⁶
• Nature of Holding: The audit indicates these are likely Tier 3 (Passive) holdings, resulting from index-tracking strategies. For example, if Shapir is in the MSCI Israel index, JPM’s ETFs must buy it.
• Voting Inaction: While the holding is passive, the voting rights are active. There is no evidence in the snippets that JPM has used its proxy voting power to protest the companies’ involvement in settlement construction.

7. Ideological Alignment and Strategic Rhetoric

Financial flows are driven by corporate strategy. The audit reveals a distinct ideological alignment between JPM’s leadership and the concept of “security” that includes robust support for the US-Israel military axis.

7.1 The “Center for Geopolitics”

JPM established the JPMorgan Chase Center for Geopolitics to provide “actionable insights” for clients.

• Narrative Construction: The Center’s reports frame the geopolitical landscape in terms of Western “resiliency” against threats. They explicitly discuss the “brittleness” of the defense supply chain and advocate for investment to fix it.⁷
• Israel Strategy: Reports discuss the strategic necessity of maintaining US military presence in the Middle East and frame the defense of Israel within the context of checking Iranian influence.⁷ This intellectual output serves to validate and encourage investment in the defense sector.

7.2 Jamie Dimon’s “Patriotic Capital”

CEO Jamie Dimon has increasingly positioned the bank as a pillar of Western security.

• Rhetoric: Dimon has stated that “a strong economy and robust national security are both imperative and mutually dependent”.²⁹
• Action: This rhetoric is matched by the $10 billion investment pledge into defense and aerospace.⁸
• Veteran Integration: The bank’s aggressive recruitment of veterans and funding of veteran-led startups creates a cultural and professional bridge between the bank and the military establishment.³⁰

8. Summary of Findings: A Tiered Forensic Table

The following table summarizes the key entities identified and JPM’s specific role, categorized by the tier of complicity.

9. Conclusion

9.1 The Verdict: Material and Structural Complicity

This forensic audit concludes that JPMorgan Chase & Co. exhibits High-Level Material Complicity in the militarization and occupation apparatus. This conclusion is not based on incidental findings of passive index holdings, but on the identification of JPM’s leadership in critical capital-raising events.

The bank’s role as a Joint Bookrunner for the State of Israel’s wartime sovereign debt issuance in March 2024 is the single most significant finding. By actively marketing and underwriting $8 billion in debt during an active conflict, JPM provided the fiscal runway necessary for the continuation of military operations. This was a discretionary business decision, executed with full knowledge of the geopolitical context.

Furthermore, JPM’s structural role as the Administrative Agent for the credit facilities of Raytheon and Lockheed Martin places it at the financial heart of the US defense industrial base. The bank ensures the liquidity that allows these firms to “surge” production of the weaponry deployed in the region.

9.2 The “Neutrality” Myth

JPMorgan Chase often presents its activities as neutral market-making or client service. However, the evidence suggests a strategic alignment. The consistent support for Israeli sovereign debt, the deep financing of the defense industrial base, the advisory work for controversial surveillance firms like Cellebrite, and the maintenance of correspondent ties with settlement-financing banks reveal a coherent pattern. JPM is not merely a bank in this context; it is a strategic financial partner to the military-industrial complex and the State of Israel.

For a Defense Logistics Analyst, the implication is clear: JPMorgan Chase is a primary node in the supply chain of capital that sustains military operations. Disruptions to JPM’s willingness to lend or underwrite would have immediate, material ripple effects on the liquidity of defense contractors and the sovereign borrowing costs of the State of Israel.

1. ANNUAL REPORT 2024 – – Gov.il, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/dynamiccollectorresultitem/annual-debt-report-2024/en/files-eng_Annual-Debt-Reports_annual-debt-report-2024-accessible-version-en.pdf
2. $2.2 Billion Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement among Raytheon Company and Lenders – Business Contracts | Justia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://contracts.justia.com/companies/raytheon-co-1110/contract/1228101/
3. registration statement – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1854587/000121390021034768/ff42021a1_cellebritedi.htm
4. List of Correspondent Banks – Export-Import Bank of Thailand, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.exim.go.th/en/Products_Services/corrlistnew.aspx
5. April 10, 2025. – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1710531/000121390025030658/filename1.htm
6. International Equity Fund, accessed February 1, 2026, https://seidocs.filepoint.live/assets/pdfs/Q4_Holdings/SIT_9_30.pdf
7. Helping Clients Navigate Global Challenges – JPMorganChase, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmorganchase/documents/center-for-geopolitics/jpmc-cfg-fullreport.pdf
8. J.P. Morgan eyeing both defense startups and legacy firms for $10B investment push: Execs, accessed February 1, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2025/12/jpmorgan-eyeing-both-defense-startups-and-legacy-firms-for-10b-investment-push-execs-say/
9. Israel – Economic Retrospective | Jefferies, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jefferies.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/10/Israel-Economic-Retrospective-October-2024-WM.pdf
10. Israel raises $5b international bond – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-israel-raises-5b-international-bond-1001501945
11. 20-F – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50277/000117891306001301/zk62585.htm
12. tm255845-1_424b5 – none – 5.6250286s – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/52749/000110465925011201/tm255845-1_424b5.htm
13. ESLT – Elbit Systems Ltd. Stock – Stock Price, Institutional Ownership, Shareholders (NasdaqGS) – Fintel, accessed February 1, 2026, https://fintel.io/so/us/eslt
14. 424B5 – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1861560/000119312524220540/d864398d424b5.htm
15. Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 24, 2022, among Lockheed Martin Corporation, the – Document, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/936468/000093646822000106/lmt-revolvingcreditagreeme.htm
16. S-4 – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1336920/000119312516544006/d162784ds4.htm
17. Elbit Systems Ltd – AUM 13F, accessed February 1, 2026, https://aum13f.com/issuer/ESLT
18. Funds Holding ESLT – Holdings Channel, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.holdingschannel.com/funds/holding-eslt/
19. SEC FORM 13-F Information Table, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103653/000095012325000326/xslForm13F_X02/38205.xml
20. – Annual report of proxy voting record for management investment companies (N-PX), accessed February 1, 2026, http://br.advfn.com/common/news/44193988
21. Document – SEC.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/90168/000009016824000062/proxy-2024.htm
22. Cellebrite Completes Business Combination with TWC Tech Holdings II Corp., Company Will Begin Trading on Nasdaq Under Symbol “CLBT”, accessed February 1, 2026, https://cellebrite.com/en/cellebrite-completes-business-combination-with-twc-tech-holdings-ii-corp-will-begin-trading-on-nasdaq-under-symbol-clbt/
23. J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing – Chase Bank, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.chase.com/content/dam/chase-ux/documents/personal/investments/fractionalshares.pdf
24. Christoffer Adler | Partner – White & Case LLP, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.whitecase.com/people/christoffer-adler
25. Gernot Wagner | Partner – White & Case LLP, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.whitecase.com/people/gernot-wagner
26. Startup Fundraising Insights | PDF – Scribd, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/804291293/Lightspeed-Ventures
27. Participating companies are subject to change. – Jefferies, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jefferies.com/wp-content/uploads/files/Conferences/0623-Tech-Trek-Company-Profiles.pdf
28. Sheet1 – Alteryx Community, accessed February 1, 2026, https://community.alteryx.com/pvsmt99345/attachments/pvsmt99345/designer-discussions/190573/3/test1%20(1).xlsx
29. Defense Tech Innovation and the Role of Startups – J.P. Morgan, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/business-planning/defense-tech-innovation-and-the-role-of-startups
30. CEOcircle’s Impact on Veteran Lives | JPMorgan Chase, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/business-planning/ceocircles-impact-on-veteran-lives
31. v. 10-05279-smb Doc 151 Filed 10/30/17 Entered 10/30/17 18:13:18 Main Document Pg 1 of 39 – Madoff Trustee, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.madofftrustee.com/document/dockets/magnify_affidavit_opposingcounsel_10-05279_docket151.pdf
32. new score list sep2022 – Swift, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.swift.com/swift-resource/197466/download?language=en
33. Correspondent banks | DZ BANK, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.dzbank.com/content/dzbank/en/home/footernavigation/guidelines-and-information/correspondent-banks.html
34. QI_LIST_09_24 – IRS, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-lbi/1stq-2024-qi-list.xlsx
35. JPMorgan, Citi to lead IEC bond offer – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000400149#!
36. PIMCO – Great Gray Trust Company, accessed February 1, 2026, https://greatgray.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PIMCO-report-2024-Final.pdf
37. A Simple Boycott List, accessed February 1, 2026, https://boycott-israel.org/boycott.html
38. Stakes in Settler Colonialism (A4) (1) – LSESU Palestine Society, accessed February 1, 2026, https://lsepalestine.github.io/documents/LSESUPALESTINE-Stakes-in-Settler-Colonialism-2025-Web.pdf
39. Monthly Trade File February 2025 – NJ.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.nj.gov/pfrs/documents/pdf/February2025TradeFile.pdf
40. Schedule of Investments – Goldman Sachs Asset Management, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.gsam.com/content/dam/gsam/pdfs/us/en/fund-resources/q3-fiscal-holdings-reports/Goldman_Sachs_MarketBeta_ETF_II_Funds_Q3.pdf?sa=n&rd=n