Audit Phase: V-MIL (Military Forensics)
Audit Date: 2026-05-01
Parent Entity: Stellantis N.V.
No public evidence identified of any direct defence contracting or procurement relationship between Maserati and any military, paramilitary, or state security entity.
Comprehensive searches across the Israeli Ministry of Defence (IMOD) procurement portal 10, the SIBAT export and defence cooperation directory, the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database 9, and major newswire archives returned no verified contracts, tender awards, framework agreements, or memoranda of understanding between Maserati and the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), Israel Prison Service, Israel Border Police, or any other Israeli state security body 910. Stellantis N.V. Annual Reports for 2022 and 2023 1 and the Stellantis SEC Form 20-F filing 2 contain no reference to defence sector contracting in Israel or any other jurisdiction on behalf of the Maserati brand.
Maserati’s product portfolio — comprising the Ghibli, Quattroporte, Levante, Grecale, GranTurismo, GranCabrio, and MC20 — consists exclusively of premium civilian passenger and grand touring vehicles 3. This product range does not correspond to any documented IDF vehicle procurement category, military utility vehicle specification, or light tactical vehicle tender.
No SIBAT directory listings, Jane’s Defence Industry supplier index entries, or Israeli defence exhibition catalogues include Maserati as a registered defence supplier or security procurement participant. No corporate press releases, Israeli government announcements, or defence trade press reports documenting defence cooperation, joint ventures, or partnership agreements between Maserati and any Israeli defence entity have been identified 12910.
Evidence gap: SIBAT’s full export directory is not comprehensively published in open-source form; a complete negative finding would require direct access to the full registry. IMOD procurement records are partially classified or unpublished, and the negative finding here applies only to available public records.
No public evidence identified of any militarised, ruggedised, or dual-use variant of any Maserati product line.
Maserati’s current and historical vehicle range has no documented mil-spec, armoured tactical, or security-force-configured variant marketed to any military or police formation 3. Maserati has not, to any publicly verifiable record, manufactured armoured personnel carriers, light protected mobility vehicles, mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) platforms, or any other purpose-built military or paramilitary vehicle.
Italian UAMA export control records and the annual Italian parliamentary arms export reports submitted under Law 185/1990 1120 contain no publicly documented export licence applications or end-user certificates for Maserati products destined for Israeli defence or security end-users. Maserati vehicles are classified under civilian motor vehicle export categories (HS Chapter 87) rather than controlled military goods lists governed by the EU Common Military List or Italy’s national control schedule. SIPRI arms transfer data 9 records no Maserati platform as a tracked military transfer to Israel or any other recipient state.
Because no militarised product line has been identified, a civilian-to-military distinction analysis is not applicable. No secondary-use certification, third-party militarisation documentation, or end-user diversion record has been located in available source classes.
Evidence gap: Secondary market resale of civilian Maserati vehicles by third parties cannot be monitored from public records; the absence of evidence does not constitute confirmed absence of any Maserati vehicles in Israeli state fleet use through secondary commercial channels.
No public evidence identified of any Maserati involvement in heavy machinery supply, construction, or infrastructure activity in occupied territories or in connection with military installations.
Maserati does not design, manufacture, or distribute heavy construction machinery, bulldozers, earth-moving plant, military engineering equipment, or prefabricated infrastructure components. The UN Human Rights Council database of businesses operating in Israeli settlements (Report A/HRC/43/71, 2020) 15, the Who Profits Research Center company database 4, and the Corporate Occupation Project profiles 14 contain no entry for Maserati in the context of settlement construction, separation barrier maintenance, demolition activity, or military installation development in the Occupied Palestinian Territory or the Golan Heights.
No construction or engineering service contracts involving Maserati have been identified in UN OCHA documentation on the Occupied Palestinian Territory 8, Amnesty International corporate complicity research 5, Human Rights Watch business and human rights reporting 6, or Corporate Occupation Project records 14. This finding is consistent with Maserati’s exclusive positioning as a premium passenger vehicle brand with no manufacturing or service capacity in the construction or engineering sectors.
Because no equipment presence in occupied territories has been identified, a direct versus indirect supply analysis is not applicable.
No public evidence identified of any supply chain integration between Maserati or its parent Stellantis and Israeli defence prime contractors.
No verified supply relationships — whether for components, sub-assemblies, raw materials, electronics, propulsion systems, or software — have been identified between Maserati (or Stellantis N.V. acting on Maserati’s behalf) and Israeli defence prime contractors including Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, or Israel Military Industries. Stellantis Annual Reports 1 and the Stellantis SEC Form 20-F 2 contain no disclosure of commercial relationships with Israeli defence primes. Maserati’s publicly available supplier communications 3 contain no reference to such relationships. Defence industry trade databases, including Jane’s Defence Industry supplier index and Breaking Defense’s supplier coverage, contain no record of such a supply chain link.
No joint development programme, co-production agreement, licensed manufacturing arrangement, or technology transfer agreement between Maserati and any Israeli defence entity has been identified across any source class reviewed, including Israeli defence trade press 910 and European Defence Agency defence data records 12.
Evidence gap: Stellantis’s supply chain disclosures do not disaggregate at the Maserati brand level for all tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers. While no link to Israeli defence primes is identified at the disclosed level, sub-tier supply chain relationships below the first tier are not fully traceable from public corporate disclosures alone.
No public evidence identified of any logistical sustainment or base services contract between Maserati and any military installation, detention facility, or state security infrastructure.
Maserati’s business operations are confined to the design, manufacture, and retail distribution of premium passenger automobiles 3. No evidence of service contracts for catering, transport logistics, fuel supply, waste management, telecommunications infrastructure, facilities management, or related sustainment services to IDF bases, military training establishments, naval facilities, or detention centres has been identified in Stellantis corporate disclosures 12, SEC filings 2, or any defence logistics trade source.
UN Comtrade data for Italy-to-Israel trade flows under motor vehicle HS codes 18 is consistent with civilian retail export volumes; no defence logistics contract, military cargo consignment, or government fleet bulk-supply agreement is indicated by available trade flow data. Maserati does not operate in the shipping, freight forwarding, or port handling sector, and no role in military supply chain logistics to or within Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territory has been identified across SIPRI records 9, IMOD procurement data 10, or defence logistics trade press.
Evidence gap: UN Comtrade trade flow data for Italy → Israel under motor vehicle HS codes does not distinguish between individual vehicle brands or between civilian retail purchasers and state fleet purchasers at the level of a public query.
No public evidence identified of any Maserati involvement in the manufacture, supply, integration, or maintenance of lethal systems, munitions, or strategic defence platforms.
Maserati is not a defence prime contractor and has no documented manufacturing capability for small arms, artillery systems, armoured fighting vehicles, tactical unmanned aerial systems (UAS), naval vessels, or any other lethal weapons platform. This applies both globally and specifically in relation to Israeli armed forces 319. No ammunition, explosive ordnance, chemical propellant, warhead component, or munitions precursor material is manufactured or supplied by Maserati. Italian UAMA export licence records 20 and IMOD procurement records 10 contain no entry for Maserati in any controlled munitions or weapons category.
Maserati has no documented role — whether as prime contractor, system integrator, maintenance provider, or sub-system component supplier — in the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, or Arrow missile defence programmes; in the F-35 Lightning II supply chain in its Israeli procurement context; in Merkava main battle tank manufacture or upgrade programmes; in Saar-class naval vessel construction; or in any ballistic missile or strategic deterrence system 919. Sub-system and critical component supply searches across Jane’s Defence Industry, Defense News, Breaking Defense, Israeli defence trade press, and SIPRI confirmed no such relationship.
No public evidence identified of adverse export licensing decisions, regulatory enforcement actions, or legal proceedings involving Maserati in relation to defence or dual-use trade.
Italian annual arms export reports submitted to Parliament under Law 185/1990, administered by UAMA (Unità per le Autorizzazioni dei Materiali d’Armamento) 1120, contain no publicly documented licence grant, denial, suspension, or revocation specific to Maserati products destined for Israeli military, security, or paramilitary end-users. Maserati’s products are exported under civilian motor vehicle trade classifications and are not subject to Military List or dual-use Annex I controls under EU Regulation 2021/821 on dual-use export controls.
No investigations, citations, warning letters, or enforcement actions related to Maserati’s compliance with arms embargoes, export control regimes (EU, US EAR/ITAR, Wassenaar Arrangement), or sanctions instruments affecting defence trade with Israel have been identified in Italian, EU, US, or international regulatory records 111220. The Transparency International Defence & Security Government Defence Integrity index 17 contains no adverse finding for Maserati. The European Defence Agency defence data portal 12 contains no record of Maserati participation in EDA programmes, pooling and sharing arrangements, or defence cooperation frameworks.
No court proceedings, judicial reviews, or legal challenges brought against Maserati or against any national government authority regarding Maserati’s defence supply activities have been identified in Italian business register records 1, major international newswire archives, or NGO litigation tracking resources 56.
Evidence gap: Italian UAMA annual reports aggregate licence data by recipient country and Munitions List category rather than by individual exporting company. A company-level negative finding derived from public UAMA reports cannot be considered exhaustive; a formal freedom-of-information (accesso agli atti) request to UAMA under Legislative Decree 33/2013 would be required for a fully definitive record.
No public evidence identified of any civil society investigation, boycott campaign, or institutional divestment action specifically targeting Maserati in connection with military supply, Israeli defence procurement, or occupied territory activities.
The Who Profits Research Center database 4, Amnesty International corporate complicity research archive 5, Human Rights Watch business and human rights reports 6, AFSC Investigate database 7, and the Corporate Occupation Project company profiles 14 contain no published investigation, report, or profile addressing Maserati’s military, security, or dual-use supply chain relationship with the Israeli state. The UN Human Rights Council database of businesses operating in Israeli settlements (A/HRC/43/71, 2020) 15 does not include Maserati.
The BDS Movement campaign archive 13 and Ethical Consumer company profiles for Stellantis 16 contain no organised boycott, divestment, or supply-chain exclusion campaign targeting Maserati specifically in connection with defence sector activities or Israeli military procurement. No institutional divestment decisions by pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, or public investment managers citing Maserati’s defence activities in relation to Israel have been identified in available source material.
Stellantis corporate sustainability and governance disclosures 12 and Maserati’s own public communications 3 contain no statements, policy positions, contract terminations, or end-use monitoring commitments made in response to civil society pressure regarding a defence or occupation-related supply chain relationship with Israel. This absence is consistent with the absence of any identified civil society pressure campaign on this specific subject and with the broader absence of any documented military supply relationship.
https://www.stellantis.com/en/investors/results-and-presentations/annual-reports ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001834225&type=20-F&dateb=&owner=include&count=10 ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2024/02/amnesty-international-israel-gaza-corporate-complicity/ ↩↩↩
https://investigate.afsc.org ↩
https://www.ochaopt.org/reports ↩
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.esteri.it/en/foreign-policy/arms-exports-reports/ ↩↩↩
https://bdsmovement.net/Act ↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session43/list-reports ↩↩
https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/company-profile/stellantis ↩
https://ti-defence.org/gdi/ ↩
https://comtrade.un.org/data/ ↩
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/index.html ↩
https://www.esteri.it/it/politica-estera-e-cooperazione-allo-sviluppo/temi-globali/disarmo/uama/ ↩↩↩↩
