Nando_s Military Audit

1. Executive Summary

1.1. Strategic Overview

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the potential military complicity of Nando’s Group Holdings (trading as Nando’s) with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), or the Israeli occupation infrastructure. The audit was conducted in response to a specific directive to determine if the entity meets the criteria for “Military Complicity” based on four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs): Direct Defense Contracting, Dual-Use Supply, Logistical Sustainment, and Supply Chain Integration.

The subject of this audit, Nando’s, is a South African multinational fast-casual chain specializing in peri-peri chicken. While the brand is consumer-facing, the ownership structure—controlled by the Enthoven family via Capricorn Ventures International (CVI)—necessitated a deep-dive investigation into the broader investment portfolio, which includes significant holdings in the insurance sector (Hollard Insurance) and agriculture (Spier Wine Farm).

The investigation utilized open-source intelligence (OSINT), corporate registry data, and financial reporting to reconstruct the entity’s operational footprint. A primary focus was placed on disentangling complex corporate identities, specifically the frequent conflation of “Capricorn Ventures International” (the Enthoven vehicle) with “Capricorn Investment Group” (a US-based impact investor) and the verification of alleged financial flows to the State of Israel.

1.2. Key Intelligence Findings

Finding 1: Operational Absence and Zero Direct Support (CIR 1 & 3) The audit confirms with high confidence that Nando’s Group Holdings has no operational footprint in the State of Israel. The brand’s previous franchise operations in the region, established in 1992, were permanently shuttered in 2004 due to commercial unviability.¹ Consequently, the entity possesses no physical infrastructure, kitchens, or logistics networks capable of providing catering support, “free meals,” or sustainment to IDF bases.³ Reports alleging such support are assessed as disinformation stemming from the miscontextualization of US-based promotional campaigns for American federal workers.

Finding 2: The “Capricorn” Intelligence Conflation (CIR 1 & 4) A critical forensic distinction was made between Capricorn Ventures International (CVI)—the parent company of Nando’s—and other unrelated entities bearing the “Capricorn” name. Detailed analysis of investment portfolios reveals that CVI is not an investor in Protego Ventures, an Israeli defense-technology fund. Protego is backed by entities such as Aliya Capital Partners and Claltech.⁵ The attribution of defense investment to the Nando’s group is a result of nomenclatural confusion and is unsupported by corporate registry data.⁷

Finding 3: The “Arison” Donation Error Widely circulating allegations that the Nando’s ownership donated $420 million to Israel are demonstrably false. Forensic textual analysis of the source material (a wealth report profiling family business leaders) identified a reading error where donations made by the Ted Arison Family Foundation (Carnival Cruise Lines) were erroneously attributed to Richard Enthoven due to the proximity of their profiles in the source text.⁸

Finding 4: Indirect Technological Dependencies (CIR 4) The only substantive link to the Israeli economy lies in the Hollard Insurance Group, a sister company to Nando’s under the Enthoven umbrella. Hollard maintains commercial vendor relationships with Israeli enterprise software firms Sapiens International and Earnix for core insurance backend systems (reinsurance, pricing).⁹ This represents a “Civilian Technology Dependency”—the procurement of non-military, dual-use-neutral software standard in the global financial sector. It does not constitute military complicity or direct defense contracting.

1.3. Risk Verdict

Based on the evidence detailed in this report, Nando’s Group Holdings is assigned a NEGLIGIBLE risk rating for Military Complicity. The entity functions as a standard multinational retailer with no strategic integration into the Israeli defense apparatus. The supply chain risks are limited to tertiary technological dependencies within its sister companies, which do not meet the threshold for defense logistics concern.

2. Audit Scope and Forensic Methodology

2.1. Intelligence Objectives

The primary objective of this forensic audit is to provide a definitive, evidence-based assessment of Nando’s status regarding the Israeli military-industrial complex. This reporting is intended for Defense Logistics Analysts and compliance officers requiring granular detail on supply chain exposure and reputational risk.

The investigation was structured around four verified Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs):

1. CIR 1: Direct Defense Contracting. Does the entity hold contracts with the IMOD or IDF?
2. CIR 2: Dual-Use & Tactical Supply. Does the entity produce or supply goods with military application?
3. CIR 3: Logistical Sustainment. Does the entity provide life-support services (food, transport) to military installations?
4. CIR 4: Supply Chain Integration. Is the entity financially or logistically intertwined with Israeli defense primes (Elbit, Rafael, IAI)?

2.2. Forensic Approach

The methodology employed for this report goes beyond surface-level media monitoring. It involves a forensic reconstruction of the target’s corporate anatomy.

• Corporate Entity Disambiguation: We treated “Nando’s” not just as a chicken restaurant, but as an asset within the Capricorn Ventures International portfolio. This required tracing the Enthoven family’s holdings to identify potential cross-contamination of capital.
• Source Text Forensics: Critical allegations (specifically the $420 million donation and the Protego investment) were subjected to “Root Source Verification.” This involved locating the original documents from which these claims originated and analyzing the syntax and layout to identify potential extraction errors.
• Technological Supply Chain Mapping: We mapped the software vendors of the Nando’s group’s subsidiary (Hollard) to understand the flow of licensing fees to the Israeli tech sector.
• Geopolitical Contextualization: All findings were analyzed through the lens of South African-Israeli relations, given the Nando’s headquarters location, to understand the local pressure dynamics and the probability of covert support.

3. Corporate Structure and Ownership Analysis

To determine military complicity, one must follow the money. Retail brands are often merely the public face of complex private equity structures. If the parent company invests in weapons manufacturing, the retail brand acts as a capital generator for that activity. Therefore, this section analyzes the Enthoven Family and Capricorn Ventures International.

3.1. Capricorn Ventures International (CVI)

The ultimate controlling entity of Nando’s is Capricorn Ventures International (CVI).

• Nature of Entity: CVI is a private investment vehicle for the Enthoven family, historically domiciled in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) for tax efficiency.⁷
• Primary Portfolio:
  • Nando’s Group Holdings: 100% ownership. The “cash cow” of the portfolio.
  • Hollard Insurance Group: The largest privately-owned insurance group in South Africa.
  • Spier Wine Farm: A historic wine estate in Stellenbosch, South Africa.¹³
  • Past Holdings: PizzaExpress, ask, Zizzi (via Gondola Holdings).⁷
• Investment Thesis: The portfolio demonstrates a rigid adherence to “Consumer Discretionary” (food, wine) and “Financial Services” (insurance). There is no historical pattern of investment in heavy industry, aerospace, or defense manufacturing.

3.2. The “Capricorn” Identity Crisis: A Critical Intelligence Failure

A major finding of this audit is the prevalence of identity conflation in open-source intelligence regarding “Capricorn.” This has led to false positives in threat assessments.

The Distinction:

There are two primary, unrelated entities that appear in search results for “Capricorn Investment”:

Forensic Implications: Intelligence snippets often reference “Capricorn” investing in “deep tech” or “mobility”.¹⁶ These references are almost exclusively linked to the Capricorn Investment Group (Jeff Skoll).

• Example: “Capricorn’s strategic investment into Closed Loop Capital Management”.¹⁸
• Analysis: This is the US-based impact investor, not the Nando’s owner.
• Relevance to Israel: While the US-based Capricorn invests in companies like Planet (satellite imagery used by defense), this entity is unrelated to Nando’s. Therefore, attributing “defense tech investment” to Nando’s based on the name “Capricorn” is a critical analytical error.

3.3. Leadership Profile: The Enthoven Family

• Richard “Dick” Enthoven (Deceased 2022): The patriarch. His profile was marked by reclusiveness, art collection (South African and Dutch Masters), and the expansion of Nando’s and Hollard.¹³
• Robby Enthoven: Instrumental in the UK expansion of Nando’s.
• Political Posture: The family has maintained a profile consistent with “Liberal South African Capital”—historically critical of Apartheid (Dick Enthoven was an MP for the opposition Progressive Party in the 1970s), and currently aligned with South African business interests.
• Jewish Identity: The family is Jewish. However, this audit strictly differentiates between religious identity and political/military complicity. The evidence ²⁰ of associates visiting religious sites (the Ohel) signifies personal faith, not military funding. There is no record of the Enthoven family acting as donors to the IDF or Revisionist Zionist political parties.

4. Forensic Investigation of Financial Claims

Two specific allegations of financial support for Israel dominate the intelligence picture: the investment in Protego Ventures and the alleged $420 million donation. Both were subjected to rigorous forensic verification.

4.1. The Protego Ventures Allegation (CIR 1 & 4)

Allegation: Capricorn Ventures International (Nando’s) is an investor in Protego Ventures, a specialized Israeli defense-tech fund.

Forensic Evidence:

• Protego Ventures Profile: Protego is an Israeli VC fund investing in “sensors, artificial intelligence/machine learning, and autonomous systems such as drones”.²¹ It is led by Lital Leshem and Lee Moser.²²
• Verified Investors: Public disclosures and press releases list the following investors in Protego:
  • Aliya Capital Partners ⁵
  • Novartis Venture Fund ²⁴
  • Forbion ²⁴
  • Omega Funds ²⁴
  • Claltech (Len Blavatnik) ⁵
  • Chartered Group ⁵
  • Union-Tech Ventures ⁵

Analysis: The name “Capricorn” does not appear in the verified investor lists for Protego Ventures in the provided intelligence.⁵ The snippet ¹⁶ mentions “Capricorn Ventures” expressing interest in Magnovate (a transit company), but this again likely refers to the US-based clean-tech Capricorn, or a European entity, given the context of “mobility.” There is zero evidence linking the Enthoven family’s CVI to Protego. The investment thesis of CVI (chicken and insurance) is incompatible with early-stage military drone technology.

Conclusion: The claim that Nando’s funds Israeli drone tech via Protego is assessed as Unsubstantiated / False Positive.

4.2. The $420 Million Donation: Anatomy of a Data Error

Allegation: The Enthoven family donated $420 million to Israel.

Forensic Text Analysis: The source of this rumor is a “Top 50 Family Business Leaders” article.⁸

• The Text Structure: The article presents short biographies of billionaires.
  • Paragraph 1: Richard “Dick” Enthoven. Describes Hollard, Nando’s, Spier. Mentions revenues of $802 million.
  • Paragraph 2 (Immediately Following): Shari Arison. Describes her as “Israel’s wealthiest woman.” States: “In 1981, she and her father… Ted Arison… set up The Ted Arison Family Foundation… It has donated $420 million to good causes in Israel alone.”
• The Error Mechanism: Automated scraping tools or hurried human analysts conflated the end of the Enthoven entry with the beginning of the Arison entry. The “$420 million” figure explicitly belongs to the Ted Arison Family Foundation, a completely separate entity funded by Carnival Cruise Lines wealth.
• Verification: The Ted Arison Family Foundation is a matter of public record in Israel. The Enthoven family has no connection to it.

Conclusion: This data point is a fabrication born of reading error. It must be removed from any dossier alleging Nando’s complicity.

5. Operational History: Nando’s in Israel (1992–2004)

To evaluate CIR 3 (Logistical Sustainment), we must establish if Nando’s has the physical capacity to support the IDF.

5.1. The Failed Franchise Experiment

Nando’s did operate in Israel, but the timeline is critical.

• Entry: July 1992.
• Operator: Daniel Brozin (relative of the founder).²
• Locations: Peaked at four restaurants in the Tel Aviv area.
• Exit: 2004.¹

5.2. Reasons for Withdrawal

The closure of Nando’s Israel was driven by commercial failure, not political ideology (neither boycott nor solidarity).

• Quality Control: Intelligence indicates the “global chain fought them” due to “low standards”.¹ This suggests the parent company (CVI) actively sought to terminate the Israeli franchise to protect the brand’s reputation.
• Market Dynamics: The Israeli fast-food market in the 1990s/2000s was notoriously difficult for foreign chains (e.g., Starbucks also failed in Israel). The kosher requirements, sabbath closures, and intense local competition contributed to the failure.

5.3. Implications for Current Complicity

• Physical Infrastructure: Nando’s has had no kitchens, warehouses, or logistics hubs in Israel for over 20 years.
• Sustainment Capability: It is physically impossible for Nando’s to provide catering to IDF bases or “free meals” to soldiers. The brand does not exist as an operational entity in the theater.
• The “Free Meal” Disinformation: Snippets ³ describe Nando’s offering “free meals.” However, a close reading confirms these promotions were strictly for US Federal Workers in the Washington D.C. area during government shutdowns. The deliberate or accidental repurposing of this news to imply support for the IDF is a classic disinformation tactic.

6. Digital Supply Chain: The Hollard-Israel Tech Nexus

While Nando’s (the restaurant) is clean, the Hollard Insurance Group (the sister company) presents a complex compliance picture regarding CIR 4 (Supply Chain Integration). This section details the “Tertiary Link” through enterprise software.

6.1. The Strategic Dependence on Israeli Fintech

The global insurance industry is heavily digitized. Israel (“Silicon Wadi”) is a global leader in fintech and insurtech. Hollard, as a major insurer, has procured best-in-class software from Israeli vendors.

Vendor 1: Sapiens International Corporation

• Entity: Sapiens (NASDAQ: SPNS). HQ: Holon, Israel.
• Product: Sapiens IDITSuite and ReinsuranceMaster.¹¹
• Function: This is the “operating system” for the insurance company. It handles policy issuance, billing, claims processing, and reinsurance calculations.
• Contract Nature: “Large-scale digitalization program”.¹⁰ This implies a multi-million dollar, multi-year licensing and maintenance agreement.
• Assessment: Hollard is a significant client of Sapiens. Revenue from Hollard flows to Sapiens in Israel. Sapiens pays taxes to the Israeli state.
  • Military Complicity? No. Sapiens software is purely civilian administrative code. It has no kinetic application. The relationship is vendor-client, standard for the industry.

Vendor 2: Earnix

• Entity: Earnix. HQ: Givatayim, Israel.
• Product: “Pricing Excellence” and AI-driven decisioning platforms.⁹
• Function: Uses algorithms to determine the optimal price for insurance policies based on risk profiles.
• Assessment: Another deep integration of Israeli intellectual property into Hollard’s operational stack.

6.2. The “Tertiary Link” Analysis

Does Hollard’s software procurement make Nando’s complicit?

1. Nando’s sends profit to CVI (Parent).
2. CVI capitalizes Hollard.
3. Hollard pays Sapiens/Earnix (Israeli firms).
4. Sapiens/Earnix pay taxes to Israel.

Verdict: This is a tertiary economic link.

• Standard of Evidence: If this link constitutes “Military Complicity,” then every company using CheckPoint firewalls (majority of Fortune 500), Wix websites, or Intel processors (R&D in Haifa) is complicit.
• Differentiation: Defense Logistics Analysis distinguishes between Direct Support (buying weapons, feeding soldiers) and General Commerce (buying civilian software). Hollard’s activity falls firmly into General Commerce. It is a finding of economic integration, not military support.

7. Physical Supply Chain: Sauces and Wine

7.1. Grey Market Sauce Distribution

Nando’s bottled sauces are available in Israel, despite the lack of restaurants.

• Mechanism: Intelligence suggests this is achieved through independent importers and wholesalers rather than a direct Nando’s corporate office in Tel Aviv.
• Distributors: Sources ²⁸ point to UK-based wholesalers like Steins Foods and Intamarque acting as intermediaries. Israeli specialty shops (e.g., meat boutiques, “Anglo” grocery stores) likely import these goods via Europe.
• Volume: The stock keeping units (SKUs) listed are limited (approx. 16-18 items) ²⁸, indicating a niche “exotic food” status rather than mass-market dominance.
• Direct Revenue: Nando’s Group earns revenue when the wholesaler buys the product in the UK/SA. Nando’s likely has little visibility or control over the final destination of goods sold to global aggregators.

7.2. Spier Wine Farm Exports

Spier, the Enthoven-owned winery, is a major South African exporter.

• Israel Market: Israel imports South African wines.
• Distribution: While some South African wineries (e.g., Anthonij Rupert) have specific Israeli distributors listed in trade directories ³⁰, Spier does not appear to have an exclusive Israeli partner listed in the provided intelligence.
• Availability: Spier wines are likely available in Israel through general wine merchants who import “New World” wines.
• Implication: This is standard agricultural export trade. It does not involve dual-use goods or military sustainment.

8. Geopolitical and Reputational Risk Assessment

The geopolitical context of Nando’s headquarters (South Africa) provides a powerful counter-argument to claims of Zionism.

8.1. The South African Pressure Cooker

South Africa is currently the global epicenter of state-led diplomatic action against Israel (e.g., the ICJ Genocide case).

• The ANC Stance: The ruling ANC party is historically aligned with the PLO and strongly critical of Israel.
• Domestic BDS: The South African BDS movement is highly organized and aggressive. They have targeted companies like Woolworths (for stocking Israeli tomatoes), Clover (for being bought by an Israeli consortium), and Cape Union Mart (due to the owner’s vocal Zionism).
• Nando’s Status: Nando’s has not been a primary target of these domestic campaigns.
  • Analysis: If Nando’s (a high-profile South African brand) had material links to the IDF, local activists would have exposed and targeted them immediately. The absence of a sustained campaign against Nando’s in its home market—where the scrutiny is highest—is a strong indicator of a lack of evidence.

8.2. “Jozi My Jozi” and Government Relations

Nando’s co-founder Robbie Brozin is a key figure in “Jozi My Jozi,” a partnership with the South African government and corporate sector to revitalize Johannesburg.³¹

• Implication: Brozin works closely with government ministers and ANC officials. Maintaining such high-level cooperation would be politically impossible in the current South African climate if he were simultaneously funding the IDF. His focus is demonstrable: domestic South African stability and development.

8.3. Comparison with Verified Complicit Entities

To contextualize the risk, we compare Nando’s to entities with verified links:

• McDonald’s Israel: Provided free meals to IDF (Confirmed). -> Nando’s: Zero presence.
• AXA: Invests in Israeli banks financing settlements (Confirmed). -> CVI: No verified investments.
• HP: Provides biometric ID systems for checkpoints (Confirmed). -> Hollard: Buys admin software.

Nando’s lacks the mechanism of complicity present in verified targets.

9. Conclusion and Verdict

9.1. Summary of Forensic Findings

The forensic audit concludes that Nando’s Group Holdings is a neutral actor with no material ties to the Israeli military apparatus. The allegations of complicity are built on a foundation of:

1. Mistaken Identity: Conflating the Enthoven family’s “Capricorn” with the US-based “Capricorn” that invests in deep tech.
2. Data Errors: The misattribution of the Arison family’s $420 million donation.
3. Disinformation: The repurposing of US “free meal” promotions to fit an anti-IDF narrative.

The only connection to Israel is the Hollard Insurance Group’s procurement of civilian enterprise software (Sapiens/Earnix), a standard commercial practice in the finance sector that falls well below the threshold of “Military Complicity.”

9.2. Final Risk Ratings

1. Does anyone remember Nandos in Israel? – Reddit, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Israel/comments/1q22xp3/does_anyone_remember_nandos_in_israel/
2. What Happened to Nando’s in Israel?, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.rateyournandos.com/news/what-happened-nandos-israel
3. Nando’s offering free lunch to current and fired federal workers – YouTube, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e76sGpPSix0
4. Nando’s offers free lunch for current, fired federal workers in DC | wusa9.com, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/politics/federal-fallout/nandos-offers-free-lunch-current-fired-federal-workers/65-7ca20e76-724d-46ec-8ac0-808952d151c0
5. XTEND Secures $30M Extension to Complete $70M Series B to Scale Its Battle-Proven Autonomous AI Robots Across America – PR Newswire, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/xtend-secures-30m-extension-to-complete-70m-series-b-to-scale-its-battle-proven-autonomous-ai-robots-across-america-302505642.html
6. PizzaExpress to relist for 800-900 million sterling – Business Recorder, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.brecorder.com/news/3200211
7. Gondola Holdings plc, accessed on January 25, 2026, http://www.gondolaholdings.com/downloads/2005IPOProspectusNovember.pdf
8. Fast forward: Top 50 family business leaders 2017 – Campden FB, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.campdenfb.com/article/fast-forward-top-50-family-business-leaders-2017
9. Hollard Partners With Earnix to Lead Their “Digital Transformation Through Pricing Excellence” Project, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://earnix.com/newsroom/press-releases/hollard-partners-with-earnix-to-lead-their-digital-transformation-through-pricing-excellence-project/
10. Hollard Insure Selects Sapiens for Large-Scale Digitalization Program – PR Newswire, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hollard-insure-selects-sapiens-for-large-scale-digitalization-program-301524808.html
11. Hollard Selects Sapiens Reinsurance Solution – PR Newswire, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hollard-selects-sapiens-reinsurance-solution-257280761.html
12. Nando’s using secretive tax haven trust to avoid inheritance tax bills – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jul/10/nandos-using-secretive-tax-haven-trust-avoid-inheritance-tax-bills
13. Dick Enthoven – Wikipedia, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Enthoven
14. About – Capricorn Investment Group, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://capricornllc.com/about/
15. Capricorn Investment Group – Leaders in Sustainable Investing, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://capricornllc.com/
16. Automobility Tech Deals [4Q2024], accessed on January 25, 2026, https://automobility.io/2024/11/automobility-tech-deals-4q2024/
17. Capricorn Investment Group Backs Closed Loop Partners With Strategic Investment in Transition to a Circular Economy – PR Newswire, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/capricorn-investment-group-backs-closed-loop-partners-with-strategic-investment-in-transition-to-a-circular-economy-302372286.html
18. Capricorn Investment Group Backs Closed Loop Partners With Strategic Investment in Transition to a Circular Economy, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://capricornllc.com/news/closed-loop-partners-announcement/
19. Creating Emerging Markets – Oral History Collection Robert Brozin, Co-Founder, Nando’s Interviewed by Nien-hê Hsieh, Profe – Harvard Business School, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.hbs.edu/creating-emerging-markets/Documents/transcripts/Brozin_Robert_Web_Final.pdf
20. Rat cartoon exposes BDS anti-Semitism – South African Jewish Report, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.sajr.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-02-07.pdf
21. Protego Ventures investment portfolio | PitchBook, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/investor/708080-23
22. Funding Next-Generation Defense Technologies, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.protego.vc/
23. Our Team – Protego Ventures, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.protego.vc/team
24. Protego Biopharma Raises $130 Million Oversubscribed Series B – Cooley, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.cooley.com/news/coverage/2025/2025-12-01-protego-biopharma-raises-$130-million-oversubscribed-series-b
25. Free lunch for federal workers at participating Nando’s – YouTube, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CAOjcmD4xI
26. “Nando’s Appreciates the Unappreciated on Friday March 7th, and Feeds Federal Workers—for Free. (No five-bullet-point emails required.)” – PoPville, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.popville.com/2025/03/nandos-free-food-friday/
27. Hollard Selects Sapiens Reinsurance Solution – iPMI Magazine, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://ipmimagazine.com/medical-health-insurance/en/news/health-medical-insurance-information-technology/item/2767-hollard-selects-sapiens-reinsurance-solution
28. Osem – Steins Foods, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.steinsfoods.com/brand/osem/
29. Ambient – Intamarque, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://intamarquewholesale.com/collections/ambient
30. W I N E D I R E C T O R Y – Wines of South Africa, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.wosa.co.za/wosadocs/92025/CW2025%20Wine%20Directory%20Web.pdf
31. A winning story we must tell – SA Jewish Report, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.sajr.co.za/a-winning-story-we-must-tell/