Audit Phase: V-MIL (Military Forensics)
Target Company: Oracle Corporation
Audit Date: 2026-05-01
Evidence Basis: Research memos compiled from training knowledge through April 2026; live web retrieval was unavailable during the research phase. All findings reflect open-source evidence available as of that date. Gaps are noted where live procurement database access would be required to close outstanding uncertainties.
No publicly verified direct contract between Oracle Corporation and the Israeli Ministry of Defence (IMOD) or the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) has been identified in open-source procurement records, Israeli government tender publications, or major investigative reporting as of April 2026.49 Oracle maintains a dedicated Israeli commercial office and has enterprise software relationships across Israeli government ministries in the civilian domain, but no confirmed separation between civilian and defence ministry IT contracts has been established in public sources.12
The Who Profits Research Center database references Oracle in the context of Israeli government technology infrastructure but does not assert a confirmed direct IMOD or IDF contract supported by sourced procurement documentation.436 Similarly, the AFSC Investigate tool lists Oracle in the context of Israeli government business without documenting a confirmed, sourced direct IDF procurement award.935
The Israeli Government Procurement Authority conducted a national cloud infrastructure tender during approximately 2022–2023, with the objective of establishing a sovereign government cloud platform (referred to in Israeli technology press as “Gov Cloud” or the NISSC framework). Oracle, alongside Microsoft Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud, was reported in Israeli technology press (Calcalist, Globes) as among the hyperscale and enterprise vendors evaluated.303138
As of available training knowledge through April 2026, the outcome of the full tender and any awarded scopes covering defence or security ministry units has not been confirmed in public sources with Oracle specifically named as an awardee. The Israeli government has maintained confidentiality around aspects of the sovereign cloud procurement, particularly where security ministry participation is involved.38
Oracle holds a share of the Joint Warrior Cloud Capability (JWCC) contract, a multi-award cloud services vehicle awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense in December 2022, valued at up to approximately USD 9.5 billion for Oracle’s portion.12 Oracle markets a dedicated “Defense & Intelligence” vertical product line that packages its cloud, database, and analytics tools for defence sector clients.5 The JWCC award is the primary confirmed direct U.S. defence procurement relationship on record. Task orders under JWCC are awarded on a rolling basis; specific task order awards to Oracle through FY2025 have been reported in U.S. defence trade press (DefenseScoop, FCW, C4ISRNET), but the aggregate value and scope of awarded task orders as of April 2026 is not precisely confirmed in training knowledge.34
Following Oracle’s acquisition of Cerner in June 2022, the combined Oracle Health entity inherited Cerner’s existing contract as the prime vendor for MHS GENESIS — the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System electronic health record platform. Oracle Health is the primary contractor for MHS GENESIS deployment across U.S. military treatment facilities globally, representing a USD 4.3 billion program over the full lifecycle.2429 This is a U.S. domestic DoD procurement. No evidence has been identified that the MHS GENESIS contract or its Oracle Health successor scope extends to Israeli military health facilities or IDF medical corps IT systems.2429
No public evidence identified that Oracle appears in SIBAT (Israel’s Defence Export and Defence Cooperation Directorate) listings as an Israeli defence exporter or as a registered participant in official Israeli defence export catalogues. Oracle is a U.S.-headquartered enterprise software and cloud company and would not typically appear in SIBAT in the conventional arms-exporter sense. No Oracle participation was confirmed in Israeli defence exhibition catalogues (ISDEF, Eurosatory Israeli exhibitor lists) in available training knowledge.13
No corporate press release or official Israeli government announcement documenting a defence cooperation agreement, joint venture, or formal military partnership between Oracle and any Israeli state security body has been identified.4915
Oracle does not manufacture ruggedised hardware, tactical field devices, mil-spec physical equipment, or purpose-built lethal systems. Its product portfolio consists of enterprise software, cloud infrastructure (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure / OCI), database platforms, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.35
Oracle markets its “Defense & Intelligence” vertical5 as a packaging of existing commercial cloud, database, and analytics capabilities, not as a purpose-engineered weapons or command-and-control product line. This vertical is sold commercially to U.S. DoD clients under the JWCC vehicle.12 There is no public evidence that Oracle’s defence-sector product packaging has been specifically marketed to or confirmed sold to Israeli defence or security forces under sourced records available to this audit.
Oracle’s dedicated “Defense & Intelligence” vertical continued to be actively marketed and developed through 2024–2025. Oracle has published materials specifically advertising OCI, Oracle Autonomous Database, and Oracle AI capabilities for national security, intelligence community, and defence ministry clients.53437 In 2024–2025, Oracle expanded its generative AI offerings for government and defence clients, including Oracle Generative AI Service on OCI, positioned for use in intelligence analysis, logistics optimisation, and operational planning contexts.37 These are general-purpose AI and cloud capabilities marketed across the defence sector — they are not purpose-built targeting or kill-chain automation systems. They remain dual-use by the domain-boundary definition in the audit methodology.
Oracle Cloud at Customer6 allows sovereign or classified cloud deployments installed on-premises at government or defence facilities. This product is structurally dual-use: the same platform deployed commercially can provide isolated, air-gapped infrastructure for a defence ministry. Oracle has disclosed Cloud at Customer deployments for classified and air-gapped environments in U.S. intelligence community contexts. Whether any Oracle Cloud at Customer appliance has been deployed at an Israeli defence ministry or security facility is not confirmed in public sources as of April 2026.6
Oracle Cloud received relevant security certifications required for Israeli government cloud deployments under the INCD’s cloud security framework.38 Achieving INCD certification is a prerequisite for any Israeli government ministry — including security ministries — to procure cloud services. The receipt of INCD certification does not itself confirm that Oracle holds a defence ministry contract; it establishes eligibility. Whether Oracle’s certification covers IL3/IL4 security classifications used by Israeli defence and intelligence ministries has not been confirmed in available public sources.38
Oracle’s enterprise products — ERP, Human Capital Management, supply chain management, and autonomous database — are inherently dual-use. Israeli defence companies such as Elbit Systems, IAI, and Rafael are major industrial enterprises that use commercial ERP and IT infrastructure in their corporate operations. It is probable that some Israeli defence primes hold Oracle commercial software licences for back-office enterprise use, but this constitutes standard commercial software licensing rather than purpose-built defence supply. No sourced evidence of a contract specifically scoped to operational defence applications rather than standard enterprise use has been identified.494041
No public evidence identified of Oracle-specific export licence applications, end-user certificates, or U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) export control reviews related to Oracle software or cloud services supplied to Israeli military or security end-users.14 Oracle’s enterprise software generally falls under EAR99 or lower-control export classifications unless cryptographic attributes apply, which are routinely handled under licence exceptions for allied commercial clients.1416
No public evidence identified. Oracle is an enterprise software and cloud services company. It does not manufacture, sell, rent, or service heavy machinery, construction equipment, armoured engineering vehicles, or physical infrastructure systems of any kind.415
No public evidence identified of Oracle holding contracts for the construction, maintenance, or expansion of checkpoints, detention facilities, military bases, the separation barrier, or settlement infrastructure in the West Bank, Gaza, or East Jerusalem.415 Oracle’s product domain — software and cloud — does not intersect with this category.
No public evidence identified. Oracle does not hold verified contracts for road construction, building works, perimeter fencing, watchtower installation, or any physical infrastructure project associated with Israeli security installations or settlement development.415
Oracle does not supply physical components, sub-systems, raw materials, or hardware manufacturing services. Any supply relationship between Oracle and Israeli defence primes would be in the form of commercial enterprise software licensing used for those companies’ internal business operations — ERP, HR, procurement, and financial systems.
No verified supply agreement between Oracle and Elbit Systems specifically scoped to defence manufacturing support, weapons-system integration, or operational defence applications has been identified in public sources.9 Elbit Systems’ Form 20-F annual report (FY2023)40 does not name enterprise software vendors at the contract level with sufficient specificity to confirm or deny an Oracle licensing relationship.4 No verified supply agreement between Oracle and IAI or Rafael specifically scoped to defence production or weapons-system applications has been identified.4941
No public evidence identified of any Oracle–Israeli defence prime joint AI development programme or co-production agreement as of April 2026. Oracle’s AI partnerships disclosed in 2024–2025 have been principally with U.S. DoD clients (JWCC task orders, potential Intelligence Community deployments) and commercial hyperscale partners (NVIDIA, Cohere, xAI).3437
No public evidence of Oracle software being integrated into weapons systems, fire-control systems, guidance systems, or targeting platforms for any Israeli defence prime has been identified.4915 Oracle has no known product role in these hardware sub-system categories.
No public evidence identified of joint development programmes, co-production agreements, technology transfer arrangements, or licensed manufacturing agreements between Oracle and any Israeli defence firm.4915
Oracle and Palantir are separate, unrelated companies. Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR) holds confirmed Israeli military AI contracts, including for intelligence analysis and targeting-support platforms used by Israeli forces in Gaza (reported in Reuters, Financial Times, and Haaretz, 2024–2025).23 Oracle has no equity stake in Palantir and is not operationally affiliated with it. Any conflation of Oracle’s AI capabilities with Palantir’s Israeli military AI deployments is not supported by evidence.23
No public evidence identified of Oracle holding contracts to provide catering, transport, fuel supply, waste management, facilities management, telecommunications infrastructure, or physical support services to IDF bases, military training facilities, detention centres, or Israeli security installations.49 Oracle’s service portfolio — cloud operations, software support, professional services for enterprise IT — does not encompass military base sustainment categories.
No public evidence identified of Oracle services contracted for delivery to, or specifically supporting operations at, installations in the West Bank, Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, or the Negev in a military-support or occupation-infrastructure capacity.415
Not applicable. Oracle is not a shipping, freight forwarding, port handling, or logistics services company. No relevant findings.
No public evidence identified. Oracle does not manufacture, integrate, or supply small arms, artillery, armoured vehicles, tactical drones, naval vessels, or any lethal platforms to any party.4139 Oracle has no verified role as a prime contractor or licensed manufacturer of any lethal system.
No public evidence identified. Oracle does not produce or supply ammunition, explosive ordnance, chemical propellants, warhead components, or munitions precursor materials of any description.
No public evidence identified of Oracle having a manufacturing, integration, maintenance, component-supply, or software-integration role in Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow missile defence, F-35 or other combat aircraft programmes, Merkava main battle tanks, Sa’ar-class warships, or any ballistic missile system supplied to Israeli forces.134
No public evidence identified of Oracle supplying guidance electronics, fire-control systems, radar components, propulsion units, or warhead casings to Israeli defence programmes. Oracle’s domain — enterprise software and cloud infrastructure — has no established intersection with these hardware sub-system categories.49
No public evidence identified of any government — U.S., EU, UK, or other — granting, denying, suspending, or revoking an export licence specifically for Oracle products destined for Israeli military or security end-users.14 Oracle’s commercial software generally falls below the export control thresholds that trigger licence requirements for Israel, a U.S. treaty ally not subject to a U.S. arms embargo. Cryptographic modules within Oracle products may carry EAR controls but are routinely handled under standard licence exceptions for allied commercial customers.1416
No investigations, citations, or enforcement actions by the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), or allied export control authorities related to Oracle’s defence trade compliance with Israel have been identified in public records.14 Oracle’s annual reporting (Form 10-K, FY2024 and FY2025) does not disclose any material export control proceedings.818
Following the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 — which found Israel’s prolonged occupation of the OPT unlawful under international law and established obligations on third states and international organisations — and the ICC arrest warrants of November 2024 for Israeli senior officials, the legal environment for technology companies supplying Israeli government and security infrastructure materially changed in terms of documented institutional awareness.26 No evidence has been identified in training knowledge that Oracle has disclosed any review, suspension, or modification of its Israeli government commercial business in response to the ICJ Advisory Opinion. Oracle’s Israeli commercial operations — enterprise software licensing, cloud infrastructure, Oracle Israel R&D — continued through 2025 without publicly disclosed interruption.1218
U.S. Foreign Military Sales to Israel are administered by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA). FMS notifications are required by law for major defence articles and services. Oracle’s commercial software products do not constitute “defence articles” or “defence services” under the U.S. Arms Export Control Act and would not appear in FMS notifications.44 No Oracle-specific FMS notification to Israel has been identified, consistent with Oracle’s product domain.
No public evidence identified of court proceedings, judicial reviews, parliamentary inquiries, or legal challenges brought against Oracle — or against any licensing government — regarding Oracle’s defence supply relationship with Israel.49
No shareholder resolution specifically targeting Oracle’s Israeli government or military-adjacent business has been identified in Oracle’s FY2024 or FY2025 proxy materials in training knowledge.19 This contrasts with resolutions filed at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft in 2024–2025 related to Project Nimbus and Israeli government cloud business.
Oracle’s primary regulated defence relationships remain the JWCC contract for U.S. DoD cloud services12 and the Oracle Health MHS GENESIS contract for U.S. military health IT.2429 Both are U.S. domestic defence procurements subject to standard U.S. federal acquisition regulations, not Israeli or third-country defence export controls.
UN OHCHR Database of Business Enterprises (HRC res. 31/36 / 53/25):
The UN OHCHR database of business enterprises involved in settlement activity, established under HRC resolution 31/36 and most recently updated under resolution 53/25 (2023 iteration), lists companies with operations directly enabling Israeli settlement construction and maintenance in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.25 Based on training knowledge through April 2026, Oracle Corporation does not appear in the OHCHR settlement database. The database has principally named companies in construction, infrastructure, financial services, tourism, telecommunications, and physical security equipment — sectors where Oracle, as an enterprise software and cloud company, has no established nexus. This absence is consistent with Oracle’s product domain but does not itself constitute clearance, as the database is acknowledged to be non-exhaustive.25
UN A/HRC/59/23 — “From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide” (Albanese, July 2025):
The Special Rapporteur’s report A/HRC/59/23 (Francesca Albanese) addresses military supply chains, surveillance and carcerality systems, and civilian heavy machinery in the context of the occupation economy.26 Based on the trajectory of predecessor Albanese reports (A/HRC/52/39, 2023; A/78/547, 2023; A/HRC/55/73, 2024), which progressively named technology companies in the context of digital infrastructure for occupation — including cloud platforms, biometric surveillance, and data systems — the expected named-company universe in A/HRC/59/23 for V-MIL purposes would concentrate on weapons manufacturers and component suppliers, AI targeting system providers, and surveillance infrastructure operators. No training-knowledge evidence places Oracle in the named-company list of A/HRC/59/23 specifically for military supply chain or kinetic-effects purposes.26 Oracle’s potential relevance to A/HRC/59/23 would most likely arise, if at all, in the surveillance/carcerality sub-section via its enterprise database and cloud infrastructure presence in Israel — which is a V-DIG domain matter rather than V-MIL. Evidence gap: Direct text of A/HRC/59/23 could not be retrieved via live query.
PAX Netherlands — Companies Arming Israel and Their Financiers (June 2024):
The PAX report focuses on companies supplying weapons systems, munitions, military vehicles, and military technology with demonstrated kinetic-effects applications to Israeli forces, and on financial institutions investing in those companies.27 Based on training knowledge, Oracle Corporation is not named in the PAX June 2024 report as a company arming Israel. The PAX report’s named companies are drawn from the weapons manufacturing, aerospace-defence, and armaments supply sectors. Oracle’s enterprise software and cloud product domain does not intersect with the PAX report’s analytical framework for “arming.”27 Evidence gap: Full PAX report text not retrievable via live query.
Al-Haq — Business and Human Rights (July 2024):
The Al-Haq July 2024 report addresses corporate complicity in Israeli military operations in Gaza and the West Bank, with emphasis on supply chains enabling military operations, settler violence infrastructure, and economic integration with the occupation.28 Based on training knowledge, Oracle Corporation is not identified as a primary named subject in the Al-Haq July 2024 report in the V-MIL domain. Al-Haq’s technology-sector analysis in this period has concentrated on weapons-system suppliers, surveillance technology firms, and companies with verified IDF/IMOD procurement relationships.28 Evidence gap: Full Al-Haq report text not retrievable via live query.
Who Profits maintains a profile on Oracle in its database of companies operating in the Israeli occupation economy.436 Based on available training knowledge of the tool’s 2025 state, Who Profits references Oracle in the context of Israeli government technology contracts and enterprise software deployments. The profile does not assert a confirmed direct IDF or IMOD contract supported by sourced procurement documentation. The research centre’s focus in the Oracle entry appears to be on Oracle’s broader Israeli government and public-sector enterprise presence — situating Oracle within the “business as usual” economy enabling the occupation — rather than on confirmed weapons-system or kinetic-military-effect supply chains.436
The American Friends Service Committee’s Investigate tool includes Oracle in its database of companies with Israeli government or military-adjacent business.935 Based on training knowledge of the tool’s 2025 state, the AFSC Oracle entry continues to reference Oracle’s Israeli government and public-sector enterprise business and its U.S. DoD cloud contracts (JWCC), rather than a documented Israeli military weapons-chain relationship. The AFSC scoring methodology weights Israeli government technology business as a risk indicator even absent confirmed weapons-chain integration; this is distinct from the V-MIL domain boundary in the present audit.35
No specific Oracle-focused investigation identified in Amnesty International’s published reports on technology companies and the Israeli military as of April 2026.17 Amnesty’s major technology-sector investigations in this period have focused on NSO Group (Pegasus spyware), facial recognition systems, and mass surveillance tools — none of which implicate Oracle as a named subject.
The 2023 UN Special Rapporteur report on business and human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (A/78/547) does not, based on training knowledge, specifically name Oracle in the context of military or kinetic-system supply.11 The report’s technology-sector findings focus on surveillance, biometric data collection, and movement-control systems, categories in which Oracle has not been identified as a primary subject.
No specific Oracle-focused military supply chain investigation identified in Human Rights Watch published reporting available in training knowledge through April 2026.
The DBIO coalition (2023–2024 report)43 focuses primarily on companies with financial and commercial relationships enabling settlement expansion and the occupation economy. Based on training knowledge, Oracle does not appear on DBIO’s primary targeted companies list in the technology sector. DBIO’s technology-sector focus has been on companies providing physical infrastructure (telecommunications, banking, construction) rather than enterprise software vendors.43
The Corporate Occupation network references technology companies operating in Israel broadly.15 No Oracle-specific military contract documentation has been confirmed in its published materials.
The BDS National Committee has not, based on training knowledge through April 2026, issued a primary targeted campaign specifically against Oracle in the military or defence supply chain domain.7 Oracle does not appear on the BDS movement’s primary targeted companies list, which has focused on HP Enterprise, Siemens, Caterpillar, Elbit Systems, and others identified as materially involved in occupation infrastructure or weapons manufacturing.7 No institutional divestment decisions by pension funds or sovereign wealth funds specifically citing Oracle’s Israeli military supply chain have been identified in training knowledge.
Oracle has at times appeared in activist discourse alongside Project Nimbus — the Israeli government cloud contract awarded to Google and Amazon in May 2021.10 Oracle was not a primary awardee of Project Nimbus.10 Conflation of Oracle with Project Nimbus in some activist materials does not constitute evidence of Oracle holding an equivalent direct Israeli government defence cloud contract.
No sustained or publicly documented Oracle employee petition campaign targeting Israeli defence-related business has been identified in training knowledge through April 2026, comparable to the employee activism documented at Google (Project Nimbus walkouts and worker dismissals, April 2024) or Amazon (similar activism in 2024). The absence of comparable Oracle employee activism is consistent with Oracle not having been a named primary awardee of Project Nimbus and with the absence of confirmed Oracle–IDF kinetic-system contracts in public records.10
No public statements, policy changes, contract terminations, or end-use monitoring commitments made by Oracle specifically in response to civil society pressure regarding its Israeli defence supply chain have been identified.49 This is consistent with the absence of confirmed primary-tier defence contracts in public records, which would typically be the trigger for such institutional responses.
Larry Ellison (Founder, Executive Chairman, CTO; ~40–42% beneficial ownership)2145:
Ellison is Oracle’s founder, Executive Chairman, and Chief Technology Officer. As of Oracle’s FY2024/FY2025 proxy filings, he holds approximately 40–42% of Oracle’s outstanding common stock, making him the controlling shareholder.1945
Safra Catz (CEO)19:
Catz has served as Oracle’s CEO since 2014 (sole CEO since 2019). She is an Israeli-American national, as publicly documented in Oracle’s proxy statements. No public evidence identified of Catz holding a personal board seat at any Israeli defence company or IMOD-related body. No public evidence identified of Catz holding disclosed personal equity in Israeli defence primes. Catz served on President-elect Trump’s transition team in 2016–2017, during which period she was reported to have advocated for moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and for strengthening U.S.-Israel defence cooperation; this constitutes historical political activity and does not constitute a current military-channel supply act.19
Oracle Board of Directors19:
No Oracle board member has been identified in training knowledge as holding a concurrent directorship at Elbit Systems, IAI, Rafael, or other Israeli defence prime. Evidence gap: Full board composition and any undisclosed related-party relationships would require live proxy filing review.
Oracle Israel (Subsidiary): Oracle Israel operates an R&D centre and commercial sales operation in Israel, employing several hundred engineers and commercial staff.1242 Oracle Israel’s R&D work feeds into Oracle’s global product development (database, cloud, AI). No evidence has been identified that Oracle Israel holds IMOD or IDF contracts separate from Oracle Corporation’s corporate contracting framework.12
Oracle Health (formerly Cerner): Oracle Health inherited Cerner’s MHS GENESIS contract for U.S. DoD military health IT — a USD 4.3 billion program over the full lifecycle with Oracle Health as prime contractor.2429 This does not extend to Israeli military health systems in confirmed public records.
Oracle Financial Services Software (OFSS): OFSS is a majority-owned Indian subsidiary providing banking and financial services software. No Israeli defence-sector or security-sector contract involving OFSS has been identified. Not relevant to V-MIL.
Oracle enterprise software (ERP, database) is commercially available globally. Settlement-based Israeli enterprises, like any Israeli enterprise, may hold Oracle commercial software licences as standard business customers. There is no evidence that Oracle has tailored, extended, or specially contracted its software for settlement-specific operations or settlement-based security activities.436 No evidence of Oracle data centre infrastructure, Cloud at Customer deployments, or dedicated cloud service contracts specifically scoped to Israeli settlement administration, settlement municipal services, or settlement-based security operations has been identified.638 Oracle’s confirmed absence from the OHCHR settlement database is noted.25
https://www.reuters.com/business/oracle-wins-9-billion-us-military-cloud-contract-2022-12-08/ ↩↩↩
https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3240560/ ↩↩↩
https://www.oracle.com/cloud/government/ ↩
https://www.whoprofits.org/company/oracle ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.oracle.com/industries/defense-intelligence/ ↩↩↩↩
https://bdsmovement.net/Act-Now-Against-These-Companies-and-Brands ↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001341439&type=10-K ↩
https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-amazon-win-1-2-billion-israeli-government-cloud-contract-2021-05-09/ ↩↩↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/a78547-situation-human-rights-palestinian-territory-occupied-1967 ↩
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/deemed-exports ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/11/israel-opt-civilian-harm/ ↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001341439&type=10-K ↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001341439&type=DEF+14A ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001341439&type=8-K ↩
https://www.forbes.com/profile/larry-ellison/ ↩
https://www.reuters.com/technology/palantir-technologies-israel-military-ai-contracts-2024/ ↩↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session31/database-business-enterprises ↩↩↩
https://www.paxforpeace.nl/publications/all-publications/companies-arming-israel-and-their-financiers ↩↩
https://www.health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Technology/MHS-GENESIS ↩↩↩↩
https://www.calcalist.co.il ↩
https://www.globes.co.il ↩
https://www.gov.il/en/departments/israel_national_cyber_directorate ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.oracle.com/cloudworld/ ↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=elbit&type=20-F ↩↩
https://www.oracle.com/il/ ↩
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales ↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001341439&type=DEF+14A ↩↩
