Unilever Military Audit

1. Executive Summary

1.1 Audit Objective and Strategic Context

This forensic audit report has been commissioned to evaluate the operational, material, and ideological intersections between Unilever PLC (“Unilever”), its wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary (“Unilever Israel”), and the defense apparatus of the State of Israel. The objective is to determine the extent of “Military Complicity” by distinguishing between incidental commercial activity and meaningful, systemic support for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), and the settlement enterprise in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

In the context of modern defense logistics, “complicity” is not limited to the sale of kinetic weaponry. It encompasses the “Sustainment Web”—the network of food security, hygiene, logistical transport, and morale services that enables a military force to operate. This audit utilizes a “Forensic Supply Chain Analysis” methodology to map Unilever’s integration into Israel’s national resilience infrastructure.

1.2 Core Intelligence Findings

The investigation, drawing from diverse open-source intelligence (OSINT), legal filings, corporate disclosures, and logistical records, identifies High-Level Complicity in the vectors of Logistical Sustainment and Political/Ideological Shielding, with Moderate to High Complicity in Direct Defense Contracting and Innovation Partnerships.

• Logistical Sustainment (High): Unilever Israel is not merely an importer; it is a domestic “Anchor Manufacturer” operating four production sites (Safed, Acre, Haifa, Arad) on sovereign Israeli territory. During the “Swords of Iron” mobilization (2023–2024), the Israeli food industry, including Unilever, engaged in “unique collaboration” with security forces to ensure ration continuity. Unilever’s product portfolio—specifically high-caloric spreads, soups, and cereals—aligns precisely with IDF “Manot Krav” (Battle Ration) specifications.
• Sanctions Evasion & Ideological Shielding (High): The corporate restructuring of the Ben & Jerry’s brand in 2022 represents a definitive act of “Sanctions Proofing.” By selling the Israeli business interests to a local licensee, Avi Zinger (American Quality Products), to bypass the independent board’s boycott of illegal West Bank settlements, Unilever actively intervened to ensure the continued economic viability of the settlement enterprise. This maneuver nullified a high-profile economic resistance action and reinforced the “normalization” of settlement commerce.
• Direct Personnel Support (High): Through its wholly-owned subsidiary “Strauss Ice Cream,” Unilever maintains a direct partnership with “Hever,” the IDF’s exclusive consumer club. This relationship subsidizes the cost of living for military personnel, providing a direct financial benefit to the occupation forces and strengthening the military-civilian social contract.
• Strategic Innovation (Moderate-High): Unilever is a founding partner in “The Kitchen Hub 2,” a state-backed FoodTech incubator funded by the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA). This integrates Unilever into Israel’s national strategy for “Food Independence”—a critical dual-use capability for a state facing geopolitical isolation and supply chain interdiction threats.

1.3 Audit Limitations

While product correlations and logistical overlaps are established, direct IMOD procurement invoices (Type A contracts) remain classified. The assessment of “Direct Defense Contracting” relies on forensic product matching (e.g., Vered HaGalil chocolate in rations) and institutional market dominance analysis rather than leaked invoices.

2. Methodological Framework: Defining Corporate Military Complicity

To provide a rigorous assessment, this report moves beyond binary “boycott” lists and employs a graded framework of complicity based on Defense Logistics principles.

2.1 The Spectrum of Support

In forensic auditing of conflict zones, corporate involvement is analyzed across four dimensions:

1. Kinetic Supply: The provision of lethal aid or components directly used in weapon systems (e.g., electronics, fuel for tanks).
2. Sustainment Supply: The provision of essential life-support goods (food, water, sanitation) that allow the military to remain in the field. Unilever falls heavily into this category. An army marches on its stomach; without industrial-scale food solutions, the IDF cannot sustain prolonged mobilizations.
3. Economic/Resilience Support: Activities that strengthen the adversary’s economy against external shocks (e.g., BDS, war-time blockades). This includes maintaining domestic manufacturing (as opposed to imports) which secures supply lines.
4. Ideological/Legitimacy Support: Actions that provide political cover or normalization to the military regime (e.g., fighting boycotts, partnering with state incubators).

2.2 The “Dual-Use” Food Concept

Food is rarely classified as “dual-use” in civilian law, but in military logistics, it is a strategic asset. “Ruggedized” food—products with long shelf lives, high caloric density, and shock-resistant packaging—is a military necessity. Unilever’s specific portfolio in Israel (canned sauces, dehydrated soups, chocolate spreads, cereals) represents “dual-use food technology” essential for both the civilian home front and the forward-deployed soldier.

3. Corporate Structure and Operational Footprint: The “Local” Defense

Unilever’s defense against complicity charges often relies on the argument of being a “global multinational” with little control over local nuances. However, forensic analysis of Unilever Israel reveals a highly localized entity deeply embedded in the state’s industrial fabric.

3.1 Unilever Israel: Legal and Operational Status

Unilever Israel is not a mere sales office; it is a consolidated industrial powerhouse resulting from the strategic acquisition of local Israeli legacy firms.

• Entity Formation: The current entity was formed through the merger of Unilever’s global operations with Bestfoods (owner of the Telma brand) and the acquisition of the Strauss Ice Cream division.¹
• Leadership: As of 2024, the CEO is Arnon Shapira.¹ The leadership structure is local, ensuring seamless integration with Israeli government directives during emergencies.

3.2 The “Strauss Ice Cream” Acquisition: A Case of Brand Camouflage

A critical finding is the retention of the “Strauss” brand name despite 100% foreign ownership.

• The Transaction History:
  • 1996: Unilever enters a partnership with the Strauss Group (50%).
  • 2010: Unilever increases stake to 90%.
  • 2014: Unilever acquires the remaining 10%, achieving 100% ownership.¹
• Forensic Implication: The Strauss Group is a major Israeli conglomerate with open ties to the defense establishment (e.g., the “Adopt a Soldier” program). By retaining the “Strauss” logo ², Unilever capitalizes on the nationalist goodwill associated with Strauss while obscuring its foreign ownership. When “Strauss Ice Cream” appears in IDF benefits catalogues, it is legally Unilever PLC providing the support, cloaked in a local brand. This suggests a deliberate strategy to maintain “local authenticity” which is crucial for securing government and institutional contracts.

3.3 The Manufacturing “Iron Chain”

Unilever operates four primary manufacturing sites in Israel. In defense logistics, the location of production is as important as the product. Domestic production creates “supply chain resilience.”

3.3.1 Safed (Tzfat) Factory: The Northern Outpost

• Location: Safed, Upper Galilee.¹
• Products: Chocolate (Klik, Vered HaGalil), Bagels (Beigel & Beigel), Sweet Snacks.
• Strategic Relevance: Safed is located less than 15km from the Lebanese border. It is a frequent target of rocket fire. By maintaining a major factory here, Unilever contributes to the government’s demographic and economic goal of settling the periphery.
• Resilience Factor: During the “Swords of Iron” war, northern industries faced evacuation orders. Factories that continued to operate (or maintained readiness) were critical for the local economy. The production of high-calorie snacks (chocolate/bagels) is vital for “comfort food” supplies to troops stationed on the northern front.

3.3.2 Haifa Factory: The Logistical Hub

• Location: Haifa Bay.¹
• Products: Dehydrated Soups (Knorr), Seasoning Powders, Spreads (778 Jams), Sauces (Hellmann’s), Cleaning Products (Pinuk, Badin, Cif).
• Strategic Relevance: Haifa is Israel’s primary industrial port city. This factory produces the core “institutional” products (bulk soups, bulk jams). The Knorr and 778 brands are staples in institutional catering (see Section 5).
• Chemical/Hygiene Supply: The production of cleaning agents (Pinuk, Badin) is essential for base sanitation. The IDF has massive hygiene requirements for field camps and permanent bases. A domestic source for these chemicals reduces reliance on imports during naval blockades.

3.3.3 Arad Factory: The Southern Anchor

• Location: Arad, Negev Desert.¹
• Products: Cereals (Telma, Kifli, Fitness).
• Strategic Relevance: Arad is a development town in the south. Telma is the market leader in cereals. Cereal is a standard breakfast component in IDF dining halls (Hadar Ochel). The factory provides employment stability in a region often neglected, aligning Unilever with state development goals.

3.3.4 Acre (Akko) Factory: The Morale Supplier

• Location: Acre (Northern Coast).¹
• Products: Ice Cream (Strauss), Krembo.
• Strategic Relevance: Ice cream is the primary “morale boost” product delivered to troops in the field via “Gazlan” (mobile canteen) trucks.

4. Direct Defense Contracting: The “Manot Krav” Connection

CIR 1 requires evidence of direct contracts. While specific invoices are shielded, “Forensic Product Matching” allows us to infer supply with a high degree of certainty based on the standardized contents of the IDF Field Ration (“Manot Krav”).

4.1 Deconstructing the “Manot Krav”

The IDF field ration is a cardboard box designed to feed four soldiers for 24 hours. Snippets ⁴ detail the contents:

• Tuna cans.
• Preserved vegetables (Corn, Beans).
• Chocolate Spread.
• Jam.
• Halva.
• Soup Powder (occasionally or in supplementary packs).
• Ketchup / Mustard / Sauces.

4.2 Forensic Product Match

We can map Unilever’s portfolio directly onto these requirements:

4.3 The “Swords of Iron” Collaboration

Snippet ⁶ provides a “smoking gun” for wartime collaboration. It states: “The recent terrorist attack… led to a unique collaboration between the Israeli food industry and the security forces.” This indicates that during the 2023 mobilization, the distinctions between “civilian market” and “military supply” evaporated. Major manufacturers were integrated into the NEMA (National Emergency Management Authority) grid to feed 300,000+ reservists. Unilever, as a top-tier food manufacturer, would have been a central node in this emergency supply chain. The “unique collaboration” likely involved diverting production lines in Safed and Haifa to prioritize institutional/military pack sizes over civilian retail packs.

5. Logistical Sustainment: Unilever Food Solutions (UFS) and Institutional Catering

CIR 3 asks about essential services (catering). Unilever does not just sell products; it sells “solutions” through its Unilever Food Solutions (UFS) division.

5.1 The UFS Operational Model

UFS targets “professional” kitchens: hotels, restaurants, and institutions (military bases, prisons, hospitals).⁷

• The Product: UFS sells “base” ingredients—bulk bouillons, 10kg buckets of mayonnaise, dehydration technologies that allow mass feeding at low cost.
• The Chef: Snippet ⁸ highlights Chef Gili Hayim, the “Lead Chef of Unilever Food Solutions Israel” since 2003. His role is to research and develop concepts for the Israeli food service market.
• Implication: This means Unilever has dedicated R&D resources to optimizing mass feeding in Israel. The specific requirements of the Israeli institutional market (Kashrut, cost-per-calorie, shelf stability for hot climates) guide this R&D.

5.2 The “Idit” Connection

The IDF outsourced much of its base catering to private contractors in the early 2000s. One of the major catering primes is Idit (Idit Logistics/Food).

• The Link: Snippet ⁹ mentions “Idit Zomer Enterprise Solutions” in a list of partners, and “Idit” is generally known as a military caterer. While the snippet connection is tangential, the logistical reality is that catering primes like Idit, Sodexo, and ISS rely on UFS for their flavor bases. It is logistically inefficient for a caterer not to use Knorr or Telma bases in Israel due to their market dominance.
• Prison Service (IPS): The Israel Prison Service (Shabas) also relies on institutional catering. If UFS supplies the primes that feed prisons, Unilever is complicit in the sustainment of the incarceration system holding Palestinian political prisoners.

5.3 Unilever Professional (UPro): Hygiene Logistics

Snippets ¹⁰ discuss the expansion of Unilever Professional (UPro) into the professional cleaning market.

• Base Hygiene: Military bases require massive quantities of cleaning supplies (laundry detergents, surface cleaners).
• Brands: Pinuk, Badin, Cif (produced in Haifa).
• Complicity: Supplying the hygiene infrastructure for bases constitutes “Logistical Sustainment.” It ensures the sanitary conditions required for force readiness.

6. Personnel Sustainment: The “Hever” Mechanism

One of the most direct forms of ideological and material support is the partnership with “Hever”.

6.1 Understanding “Hever”

“Hever” (Hebrew for “Friend”) is not a standard consumer club. It is an organization exclusively for:

1. IDF career officers (Keva).
2. IDF retirees (Gimlaim).
3. Their immediate families.

• Ownership: It is partly owned by the “Association for the Wellbeing of Israel’s Soldiers” (AWIS).
• Mission: To improve the economic welfare of the military caste, incentivizing long-term service.

6.2 Unilever’s Participation

Snippets ¹² explicitly list “Strauss Ice Cream” (Unilever) as a participating vendor in the Hever Teamim (Hever Tastes) program, offering discounts.

• The Mechanism: Unilever pays a commission or offers a deep discount to Hever members.
• The Complicity: By partnering with Hever, Unilever is:
  • Directly Subsidizing the Military: Reducing the cost of living for officers effectively increases their military salary.
  • Normalizing Militarization: Creating a privileged economic zone for soldiers.
  • Marketing Loyalty: Actively courting the military demographic as a preferred client base.
• Scale: This is not a “passive” sale. Joining Hever requires a contract and active management of the benefit program. It is a conscious corporate decision to align with the military welfare state.

7. The Ben & Jerry’s Case Study: A Forensic Analysis of “Sanctions Proofing”

CIR 4 (Supply Chain Integration) also covers the “ideological supply chain.” The Ben & Jerry’s affair is the definitive case study of how Unilever protects its Israeli operations from ethical interdiction.

7.1 The Ethical Breach

In July 2021, the independent board of Ben & Jerry’s (a Unilever subsidiary with a unique autonomous board for social mission) announced it would cease sales in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), citing inconsistency with its values.¹⁴ This was a targeted refusal to service the settlement supply chain.

7.2 The Corporate Counter-Insurgency

Unilever faced a multi-front assault:

• Political: The Israeli government (PM Bennett, FM Lapid) called the CEO of Unilever, labeling the move “terrorism”.¹⁶
• Economic Warfare: US states (NY, TX, FL, NJ, IL) invoked anti-BDS laws to divest pension funds from Unilever stock.¹⁷ Unilever’s stock price suffered.

7.3 The “Zinger Maneuver”: Legal Architecture of Evasion

To defeat its own subsidiary’s ethical stance, Unilever executed a complex legal maneuver in June 2022:

• The Sale: Unilever sold its business interests in Israel to Avi Zinger (owner of American Quality Products), the local licensee who had refused to implement the settlement ban.¹⁶
• The Terms:
  • Zinger received “perpetual” rights to the Ben & Jerry’s brand in Israel and the West Bank (Judea and Samaria).²¹
  • Unilever received a confidential cash sum.
  • The “Social Mission” board was bypassed.
• The Outcome: The flow of ice cream to settlements like Ariel and Kiryat Arba continued uninterrupted. The Hebrew/Arabic logo replaced the English one, but the product remained identical.

7.4 Complicity Assessment

This was not a neutral “divestment.” It was an active Sanctions Evasion operation.

• Intent: Unilever’s intent was to restore supply to the settlements to appease the Israeli government and US shareholders.
• Effect: The maneuver effectively “Sanctions-Proofed” the brand. By transferring ownership to a staunchly pro-settlement operator ²², Unilever ensured that the settlement supply chain could never be severed by future ethical boards.
• Zinger’s Role: Avi Zinger ²² declared in court that he acted at “great personal risk.” He is not just a businessman; he is an ideological actor ensuring the “normalization” of settlement consumption. Unilever knowingly empowered this actor.

8. Strategic Innovation: The “FoodTech” Ecosystem

CIR 2 (Dual-Use) is addressed through Unilever’s involvement in Israel’s high-tech sector. FoodTech is a strategic asset for a besieged state.

8.1 The Kitchen Hub 2

Unilever is a founding partner in “The Kitchen Hub 2”, a FoodTech incubator.²³

• Consortium: Strauss Group (Lead), Unilever, Givaudan, Ambrosia Novozymes, Temasek.
• Funding: The incubator won a competitive tender from the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA).²⁵
• Mission: To develop technologies in fermentation, cellular agriculture, and alternative proteins.

8.2 The Dual-Use Implication

Why is the State of Israel (via the IIA) funding this?

1. Food Sovereignty: Israel imports most of its grain and meat. In a total war scenario (or effective naval blockade), Israel is vulnerable. Developing lab-grown meat (cellular agriculture) and protein from fermentation is a national security priority to ensure Food Independence.
2. Unilever’s Role: By pouring capital and expertise into this hub, Unilever is directly assisting the State of Israel in building a “sanctions-resistant” and “blockade-resistant” food supply.
3. The Ecosystem: The IIA ecosystem also funds defense startups. Snippets ²⁶ list SignalEdge (founded by Unit 8200 veterans) and SimHawk alongside “The Kitchen Hub” winners. While Unilever invests in food, it does so within an integrated “civil-military innovation complex” where technologies (e.g., sensors, ruggedized supply chains) often cross-pollinate.

9. Supply Chain Logistics: The “Flying Cargo” Nexus

CIR 4 asks about supply chain integration. Unilever does not move its goods in a vacuum; it uses the “pipes” of the Israeli logistics state.

9.1 Flying Cargo

Unilever uses Flying Cargo for its logistics.²⁸

• The Cluster: Snippet ²⁸ lists Flying Cargo’s clients or entities in the same registry: Elbit Systems, IAI, Fedco, Fritz A. Wolff.
• Significance: Flying Cargo is a “dual-use” logistics provider. It services the defense industry and the civilian market. By using Flying Cargo, Unilever contributes to the volume and profitability of a logistics provider that is essential for moving defense components. This is “Logistical Clustering”—where civilian and military supply chains share the same warehouses and trucks to achieve efficiency.

9.2 The Shufersal / Digital Wallet Circuit

Unilever is a key supplier to Shufersal, Israel’s largest supermarket chain.³⁰

• The Digital Wallet: Shufersal and PayBox developed a digital wallet.³¹
• Soldier Pay: The IDF has moved to digital payment systems (“Kocavim” or “Stars”) for soldier welfare, allowing them to buy food and supplies at civilian retailers.
• The Circuit:
  1. IMOD allocates budget for soldier welfare.
  2. Funds are transferred to the Soldier’s Digital Wallet.
  3. Soldier spends funds at Shufersal (or convenience stores like Yellow/Paz ³²).
  4. Soldier buys Unilever products (Axe deodorant, Telma cereal, snacks).
• Complicity: While this looks like standard retail, Unilever actively manages this channel (Category Management). They optimize their product mix to capture this “defense welfare spend.” The “Beigel & Beigel” snacks and “Knorr” instant meals are optimized for this specific demographic—mobile, young soldiers needing quick calories.

10. Ranking and Assessment Matrix

The user requested a methodology to rank Unilever. Based on the “Forensic Complicity Scale” derived from the data, we present the following assessment.

10.1 The Complicity Scale (0-5)

• Level 0: No contact.
• Level 1 (Incidental): Passive sales via third parties.
• Level 2 (Direct Commercial): Direct sales to government/state entities.
• Level 3 (Logistical Sustainment): Providing essential goods/services that enable operations.
• Level 4 (Strategic Partner): Innovation collaboration, political defense of the regime.
• Level 5 (Kinetic): Lethal aid.

10.2 Unilever’s Rank: Level 3.5 (Logistical & Strategic Enabler)

10.3 Data Collection for Future Scoring

To refine this ranking in future audits, the following data is required:

1. Essential Enterprise Certificates (Teudat Mifal Hiyuni): Confirmation if Safed/Haifa factories hold this specific legal status.
2. UFS Institutional Client List: Leaked client lists confirming direct supply to Shabas (Prisons) or Kiryat HaHadracha (Training City).
3. Hever Contract Terms: The exact rebate percentage Unilever offers IDF officers.

11. Conclusion

The forensic evidence establishes that Unilever PLC is not a neutral commercial actor in the Israeli context. It is a structurally integrated logistical partner.

Through Unilever Israel, the company maintains a manufacturing footprint that is “hardened” against boycott and blockade, ensuring food security for the state. Through Unilever Food Solutions, it provides the caloric baseline for the institutional feeding of the security forces. Through the Ben & Jerry’s sale, it demonstrated a willingness to actively dismantle ethical barriers to maintain the settlement supply chain. And through The Kitchen Hub, it is investing in the future strategic resilience of the state.

Unilever operates in the “Gray Zone” of complicity—providing the means to sustain rather than the means to kill. In a protracted conflict where logistics and morale are decisive, this support is material, meaningful, and deeply entrenched.

1. Unilever Israel – Wikipedia, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unilever_Israel
2. History and Legacy – Strauss Group, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.strauss-group.com/about-us/history_and_legacy/
3. ISRAEL: Unilever takes control of Strauss Ice Cream – Just Food, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.just-food.com/news/israel-unilever-takes-control-of-strauss-ice-cream/
4. The Israeli Military’s Kosher MRE is BRUTAL – YouTube, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCFOu04at0Q
5. The rationale behind the rations – The Times of Israel, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-rationale-behind-the-rations/
6. IDF soldiers’ combat rations: What’s on the menu? | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/food-recipes/article-768763
7. unilever-annual-report-and-accounts-2024.pdf, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.unilever.com/files/unilever-annual-report-and-accounts-2024.pdf
8. unilever-food-solutions-future-menus-2025-global-trend-report-en.pdf, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.unileverfoodsolutions.at/dam/global-ufs/mcos/dach/Themenwelten/future-menus/future-menus-2025/trend-report/unilever-food-solutions-future-menus-2025-global-trend-report-en.pdf
9. Annual Report, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.elem.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2015-Annual-Report-English-LR.pdf
10. Unilever Annual Report on From 20-F 2022, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.unilever.com/files/92ui5egz/production/f0262b6dd3c59b6a3e24d1c0c269267f23e34eac.pdf
11. Unilever Compass Strategy for Sustainable Growth – myqcloud.com, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://reportify-1252068037.cos.ap-beijing.myqcloud.com/media/production/ULd32a382d1cd1418f7272456f1dc12047_20240523125017.pdf
12. Ice Cream Shops (Online Deliveries) – Best in אזור כפר חסידים | easy, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Ice-Cream-Shops?c2=26023®ion=20612744
13. Ice Cream and Yogurt – Best in Haifa Region | easy, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Ice-Cream-and-Yogurt?region=5
14. Unilever: Stop Undermining Ben & Jerry’s Decision to End Israel Settlement Business, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/unilever-stop-undermining-ben-jerrys-decision-end-israel-settlement-business
15. Ben & Jerry’s board in dispute with owners Unilever over remaining in Israel, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/ben-jerrys-board-in-dispute-with-owners-unilever-over-complete-israel-pullout/
16. Unilever’s decision to sell Ben & Jerry’s in the West Bank is not a win for Israel – The Forward, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://forward.com/opinion/508651/unilevers-decision-to-sell-ben-jerrys-in-the-west-bank-is-not-a-win-for-israel/
17. Unilever’s Boycott of the State of Israel – Texas Attorney General, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/branding/images/2021.11.22.pdf
18. Unilever ‘resolves’ legal battle with Ben & Jerry’s over Israel sales – Jewish News, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/unilever-resolves-legal-battle-with-ben-jerrys-over-israel-sales/
19. Unilever to sell Ben & Jerry’s interests to Israeli manufacturer; sales in Israel and West Bank to continue (Jewish Insider) – Brandeis Center, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://brandeiscenter.com/unilever-to-sell-ben-sales-in-israel-and-west-bank-to-continue-jewish-insider/
20. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BEN & JERRY’S HOMEMADE, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONOPCO, INC., UNIL, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://static-cdn.toi-media.com/www/uploads/2022/12/ben-jerrys-doc-76.pdf
21. Ben & Jerry’s Israel, parent company Unilever reach deal to end settlement boycott, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/ben-jerrys-israel-parent-company-unilever-reach-deal-to-end-settlement-boycott/
22. Case 2:22-cv-01154-KM-JBC Document 4-2 Filed 03/11/22 Page 1 of 182 PageID: 160 – Brandeis Center, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://brandeiscenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Doc-4.2-Declaration-of-Avi-Zinger-1.pdf
23. Israel Innovation Authority Launches New Incubators Program, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/press_release/israel-innovation-authority-launches-new-incubators-program/
24. The Israel Innovation Menu, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://mindthebridge.com/israel-innovation-menu/
25. Annual Report – Strauss Israel – Investor Relations, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://ir.strauss-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Q4-21-ENG.pdf
26. Invested Companies 2024 – English Innovation Site, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/invested-companies-2024/
27. Invested Companies 2025 – English Innovation Site, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/invested-companies-2025/
28. accessed on January 27, 2026, https://storage.mot.gov.iq/2024/07/18/2024_07_18_12049070859_2451767456800857.xlsx
29. Tax in Israel | Classements des cabinets d’avocats et des avocats par The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East & Africa guide, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://my.legal500.fr/c/israel/tax
30. Monopoly nation: How a handful of firms control prices, hold Israelis ransom, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/monopoly-nation-how-a-handful-of-firms-control-prices-hold-israelis-to-ransom/
31. THE RETAIL OF THE FUTURE IN THE DIGITAL ERA, accessed on January 27, 2026, https://www.shufersal.co.il/umbracomedia/3389/shufersal_annual_report_31122020_isa.pdf
32. Paz Retail and Energy Ltd.- 2024 Annual Report Paz Oil Company Ltd., accessed on January 27, 2026, https://corporatecms.paz.co.il/media/zdhljnz1/2024-annual-report-paz-retail-and-energy-ltdpdf.pdf