Governance Audit and Political Risk Assessment of American Express: Ideological Alignment and Geopolitical Complicity

The following report provides an exhaustive political risk audit and governance analysis of American Express, conducted from the perspective of a senior Governance Auditor and Political Risk Analyst. The objective is to delineate the ideological and material footprint of the corporation in relation to its support for the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the broader systems of militarization and surveillance that define the current geopolitical landscape in the Middle East. This analysis utilizes a framework of “Political Complicity,” examining how corporate leadership, financial operations, and technological integrations serve to either maintain or challenge international norms and human rights.

The report is structured around four core intelligence requirements: the screening of governance ideology and leadership affiliations; the mapping of bilateral trade and lobbying activities; the application of the “Safe Harbor” test to identify double standards in conflict responses; and the investigation of internal policies regarding staff expression and solidarity. By synthesizing executive biographies, financial filings, trade chamber activities, and comparative corporate statements, this audit establishes a comprehensive data set for future institutional ranking.

Governance Ideology and Executive Affiliations

The ideological trajectory of a multinational financial institution is fundamentally directed by its Board of Directors and executive leadership. For American Express, this leadership is characterized by a deep embedding within the institutional frameworks of the American corporate-political establishment, which has historically maintained a strategic consensus on the defense and economic integration of Israel.

Executive Leadership Analysis: Stephen J. Squeri

Stephen J. Squeri has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Express since 2018, overseeing a period of significant technological expansion and geopolitical volatility.¹ A veteran of the company with a tenure exceeding 40 years, Squeri’s institutional profile suggests a leadership style focused on the integration of financial services with the broader security and governance goals of the Western economic order.²

While public filings do not explicitly list Squeri as a member of Zionist advocacy groups such as AIPAC or the Jewish National Fund (JNF), his leadership roles within the Business Roundtable and the Partnership for New York City place him at the nexus of corporate lobbying efforts that prioritize stable U.S.-Israel relations.² As the chair of the corporate governance committee at the Business Roundtable, Squeri is responsible for shaping the standards by which American corporations interact with global political challenges.² The Business Roundtable has historically advocated for trade policies that strengthen bilateral ties between the United States and its strategic allies, including the 1985 U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement, which remains a cornerstone of the economic relationship.⁶

The Board of Directors and Strategic Alignment

The Board of Directors at American Express includes figures with significant influence in sectors directly adjacent to the military and technological cooperation between the U.S. and Israel. Theodore Leonsis, John Brennan, and Daniel Vasella represent a board structure that prioritizes global stability and the maintenance of high-value trade corridors.⁴

John Brennan, the Lead Independent Director and former CEO of Vanguard, represents the interests of institutional asset management, a sector that has increasingly faced scrutiny for its investments in companies complicit in settlement activity.⁴ Daniel Vasella’s history as the former CEO of Novartis links the board to the pharmaceutical sector, another area of deep integration between the U.S. and Israel through various R&D partnerships.⁴ The collective experience of the board suggests a governance ideology that views Israel not merely as a market, but as a critical node in the global financial and security architecture.

The ownership structure of American Express is dominated by institutional giants such as Berkshire Hathaway, Vanguard, and BlackRock. These entities are primary drivers of the “Stakeholder Capitalism” model, which often balances human rights rhetoric with the material necessity of supporting strategic state partners. The influence of these owners ensures that American Express’s political positioning remains aligned with the broader mandates of the New York financial elite, who maintain robust ties to Zionist advocacy through philanthropic and policy-shaping organizations such as the American Jewish Committee.⁹

Majority Owners and Historical Advocacy

The analysis of majority ownership reveals a preference for institutional stability over geopolitical disruption. While no single majority owner is a public-facing Zionist advocate in the mold of Lord Stuart Rose at ASDA, the institutional owners of American Express are central to the fundraising ecosystems of pro-Israel think tanks and defense-oriented organizations in Washington, D.C..⁹ The alignment of these owners with the maintenance of the status quo in the Middle East provides a “governance shield” for American Express, allowing it to maintain its operations in the region with minimal pressure for divestment compared to more consumer-facing sectors.

Bilateral Trade, Market Integration, and “Innovation Diplomacy”

The political complicity of American Express is perhaps most evident in its decades-long effort to integrate its financial network with the Israeli economy, often in direct partnership with institutions that are foundational to the maintenance of the occupation.

Historical Context: The 1956 Boycott Controversy

The current deep integration of American Express in Israel must be viewed against the historical backdrop of its 1956 controversy. In the mid-1950s, American Express was accused by the Israel Government Tourist Office of capitulating to the Arab League boycott by closing its offices in Israel and preventing its partner, Hertz Drive-Ur-Self, from expanding there.¹¹ Israel viewed this as a significant betrayal, labeling the company’s actions as “in contradiction to every accepted commercial consideration”.¹¹

This historical episode created a long-term reputational debt that the corporation has sought to repay through decades of robust support for the Israeli financial sector. The transition from a company accused of yielding to the Arab boycott to one that acquires Israeli tech startups and partners with settlement-financing banks represents a significant ideological pivot aimed at securing its position in the U.S. domestic market.

Technological Complicity: The Nipendo Acquisition

In January 2023, American Express acquired Nipendo, an Israeli-based fintech company specializing in the automation of Procure-to-Pay (P2P) processes.¹² Nipendo’s platform was designed to streamline business-to-business (B2B) payments, allowing for the seamless automation of accounts payable and receivable.¹²

The acquisition, estimated at $15 million to $20 million, initially turned Nipendo into a local R&D center for American Express in Netanya.¹³ However, by mid-2025, American Express announced the closure of its Israeli operations and the layoff of the local workforce, while retaining the global rights to Nipendo’s technology.¹² This “extractive integration” model allows American Express to benefit from the intellectual capital generated within the Israeli tech ecosystem—an ecosystem heavily subsidized by the Israeli Ministry of Defense and state-led innovation programs—without maintaining a long-term physical presence that could be targeted by BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) activists.⁸

Partnership with Complicit Banks: The Bank Hapoalim Nexus

The primary mechanism of American Express’s operational complicity in Israel is its partnership with Bank Hapoalim, the nation’s largest financial institution. For over a decade, American Express and Bank Hapoalim have collaborated on “Small Business Day” (Shop Small), a nationwide marketing campaign designed to encourage spending at local businesses.¹⁴ American Express provides the branding, digital tools, and customer incentives, while Bank Hapoalim provides the local infrastructure and customer base.¹⁴

The significance of this partnership lies in Bank Hapoalim’s documented role in the occupation. The bank is explicitly listed in the United Nations database of companies complicit in the Israeli settlement enterprise.⁸ Human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch and the BDS movement, have evidenced that Bank Hapoalim:

• Provides loans for the construction of housing projects in illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.⁸
• Acts as a guarantor for major construction companies building infrastructure in occupied territories, such as the Jerusalem Light Rail.⁸
• Provides mortgages to homebuyers in settlements and financial services to settlement local authorities.¹⁸
• Operates branches within illegal settlements, providing essential financial services that sustain the settlement economy.¹⁹

By maintaining a high-profile, multi-year partnership with Bank Hapoalim, American Express provides institutional legitimacy and financial support to an entity that is a cornerstone of the settlement system. This partnership contradicts any corporate claim of “neutrality” or adherence to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.²⁰

“Business Israel” and Bilateral Trade Chambers

American Express is a central participant in the network of trade chambers and business alliances that promote “Brand Israel” to the global financial community. The corporation’s activities are often channeled through the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce (AmCham Israel) and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s U.S.-Israel Business Initiative (USIBI).⁶

In 2017, the “Business Israel” program was launched, a multi-year initiative designed to bring executives from across the 50 U.S. states to Israel to foster investment and collaboration in sectors such as cybersecurity and FinTech.⁶ These trade missions, supported by companies like American Express, serve a dual purpose: they facilitate the transfer of technology and capital, and they act as a form of “innovation diplomacy,” rebranding the State of Israel as a technological pioneer to distract from the humanitarian implications of its military policies.

The “Safe Harbor” Test: Analyzing the Double Standard

A core intelligence requirement for assessing political complicity is the “Safe Harbor” test, which compares a corporation’s response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict with its response to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The presence of a “double standard” indicates that the corporation’s “neutrality” policy is selectively applied to protect strategic interests rather than to uphold universal human rights.

The Russia-Ukraine Precedent (2022)

In March 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, American Express acted with unprecedented speed and moral clarity. CEO Stephen Squeri issued a formal statement describing the invasion as an “ongoing, unjustified attack on the people of Ukraine”.²² American Express immediately:

• Suspended all operations in Russia and Belarus.²²
• Terminated its relationships with Russian banks.²²
• Blocked the use of globally issued Amex cards at Russian merchants and ATMs.²²
• Blocked locally issued Russian cards from working on the global Amex network.²²
• Voluntarily liquidated its banking license in Russia, becoming the first foreign bank to do so rather than sell its business.²⁴

This response was framed not as a business decision, but as a moral imperative in defense of international law and human rights. The language was definitive, and the action was total.

The Israel-Gaza Response (2023-2024)

In contrast, the response to the escalation of the conflict in Gaza following the October 7, 2023, attacks followed a radically different template. Stephen Squeri’s statement on October 11, 2023, focused exclusively on the “incomprehensible terrorist attacks on Israel,” expressing concern for “victims, their families, and people whose lives have been… impacted”.²⁵

The material response included:

• A $1.5 million donation to relief efforts in Israel, with the first $750,000 going to the American Friends of Magen David Adom.²⁵
• No suspension of operations or termination of partnerships with complicit Israeli banks.⁸
• Continued integration of Israeli-developed B2B payment technologies into the global network.¹²
• No corporate statement addressing the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, which international organizations have described as an “engineered humanitarian catastrophe and mass starvation”.²⁷

Comparative Rhetoric and Action

The disparity between the Russia and Gaza responses is stark. In the case of Russia, the corporation prioritized international law and human rights over its operations. In the case of Israel, the corporation prioritized its regional presence and ideological alignment over the human rights of the occupied Palestinian population.

This asymmetry demonstrates that American Express operates under a “Safe Harbor” bias, where the State of Israel is afforded a level of institutional protection that is denied to other states involved in similar international law violations. This selective application of corporate ethics is a primary indicator of political complicity.

Internal Policy and the Policing of Solidarity

Corporate “neutrality” is frequently used as a tool to suppress internal dissent and ensure that the workforce remains aligned with the leadership’s ideological preferences. The audit of American Express’s internal environment suggests a culture where support for the established order is encouraged, while solidarity with the Palestinian cause is effectively marginalized.

The Human Rights Statement and Code of Conduct

American Express’s official Human Rights Statement claims to respect the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and commits the company to a “welcoming and inclusive culture where everyone’s voice matters”.²⁰ The 2007 Code of Conduct and its subsequent updates emphasize the right of employees to raise concerns without fear of retaliation.³⁰

However, the reality of these policies is tested in the context of Palestine solidarity. While there are no widely publicized reports of American Express firing employees for wearing Palestinian pins—unlike documented cases at Apple and the 92nd Street Y—the institutional atmosphere is shaped by the CEO’s clear signaling.³² When the Chairman and CEO frames the conflict solely as “terrorist attacks on Israel” and commits $1.5 million to Israeli relief, it creates an environment where expressing an opposing view, such as support for the “Free Palestine” movement, can be perceived as “insubordination” or a violation of the “neutrality” policy.²⁵

Selective “Healthy Minds” Support

Following October 2023, Stephen Squeri encouraged colleagues to use the “Healthy Minds” program for counseling, specifically noting those “deeply disturbed by the images in the news” and those with “personal connections” to the victims in Israel.²⁵ There was no equivalent institutional outreach to employees with ties to Gaza or those disturbed by the systematic destruction of Palestinian civil infrastructure.²⁹ This selective empathy from the highest level of leadership serves to normalize one set of victims while rendering the other invisible, thereby enforcing an ideological bias under the guise of “caring and support.”

The Chilling Effect of Industry Trends

The risk to American Express employees is heightened by the broader trend in the U.S. corporate sector, where workers have been disciplined or fired for showing solidarity with Palestine. Reports indicate that at companies like Goldie and Apple, employees were “actioned against” for wearing kaffiyehs, pins, or bracelets.³² In one case at the 92nd Street Y, a staff member was terminated after refusing to remove a watermelon sticker (a symbol of Palestinian resistance) from her ID badge.³⁴

Within this climate, the “Neutrality” policy of American Express functions as a “silencing mechanism.” By not explicitly protecting the right to express solidarity with all human rights causes, the corporation ensures that its workforce remains a “Safe Harbor” for pro-Israel sentiment, while Palestinian solidarity is treated as a disruptive, “political” act that falls outside the bounds of professional conduct.

Lobbying, Political Economy, and Systemic Support

The political complicity of American Express extends into the legislative arena, where its political action committee (PAC) and lobbying expenditures support the political figures who sustain the U.S.-Israel military and economic alliance.

AXP PAC and AIPAC-Aligned Recipients

The American Express Political Action Committee (AXP PAC) is a significant player in the federal election landscape, funded by voluntary employee contributions.⁵ In the 2024 cycle, American Express disclosed over $1.6 million in federal lobbying expenses.⁵

A critical area of inquiry is the overlap between AXP PAC recipients and those supported by AIPAC. AIPAC, the preeminent pro-Israel lobbying group, spent nearly $127 million in the 2023-2024 election cycle to support candidates who favor unconditional military aid to Israel and to oppose those who advocate for a ceasefire or human rights conditions on aid.¹⁰

Top recipients of AIPAC funding, such as House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, also receive support from the broader corporate PAC ecosystem, including the AXP PAC.¹⁰ By funding the same legislative leaders who approve multi-billion-dollar security assistance packages for Israel, American Express’s political arm helps maintain the bipartisan infrastructure that facilitates the occupation.²⁸

Lobbying on Security and Cyber-Coordination

American Express’s lobbying efforts are not limited to financial regulation; they also encompass the broader security-finance nexus. The corporation’s interest in cybersecurity and B2B automation aligns with the U.S. and Israeli government agreements on “Cooperation in Science and Technology for Homeland Security Matters”.³⁹

These agreements, which include the Israel National Cyber Directorate and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), focus on protecting “critical infrastructures” and combating “terrorist financing”.⁴⁰ As a global payment network, American Express is a vital part of this critical infrastructure. Its participation in this security architecture ensures that its financial tools are integrated with the surveillance and monitoring systems used by both states to control the flow of capital, which can be used to target Palestinian NGOs and relief organizations.⁴⁰

The Security-Finance Nexus: FinTech as a Tool of Control

The role of American Express in the occupation is not merely passive; it is an active participant in the creation of a financial system that prioritizes security-state interests over individual rights.

FinTech and Surveillance

The acquisition of Nipendo and the subsequent integration of its technology into the global Amex network illustrates how FinTech can be used as a tool of geopolitical control.¹² P2P (Procure-to-Pay) automation allows for the granular tracking of business transactions, providing the “visibility” that is essential for both commercial efficiency and state-level surveillance.

In the context of the occupation, financial “visibility” is a double-edged sword. While it facilitates trade with Israeli entities, it is also used to enforce the “captivity of the Palestinian market”.¹⁹ Because Palestinian banks must rely on Israeli banks for Shekel clearing and money transfers, and because Israeli banks (Amex’s partners) demand high collaterals and pose limitations on transfers, the Palestinian economy remains perpetually subservient to the Israeli security apparatus.¹⁹ American Express, by providing the technological and brand infrastructure for this system, becomes a vital link in the chain of economic control.

Critical Infrastructure and the BIRD Program

The collaboration between American Express and the Israeli tech sector is often mediated through programs like the BIRD (Binational Industrial Research and Development) Foundation.⁴⁰ The BIRD program, which receives support from the U.S. DHS and the Israeli Cyber Directorate, focuses on securing energy facilities and other critical infrastructure.⁴⁰ American Express’s role as a financial “critical infrastructure” provider places it within the same research and development loop that produces the surveillance and cyber-defense tools used to monitor and manage the occupied territories.

Philanthropic Bias and the Humanitarian Hierarchy

The final component of this audit is an analysis of American Express’s philanthropic priorities, which reveal a “humanitarian hierarchy” that values Israeli life and institutional stability over Palestinian human rights.

The AFMDA Grant and Institutional Support

The decision to direct $750,000—half of the initial aid commitment—to American Friends of Magen David Adom (AFMDA) is significant.²⁵ Magen David Adom is Israel’s national emergency medical service. While it provides essential lifesaving services, it is also an integral part of the Israeli state’s civil defense and national security structure. By funding AFMDA, American Express is providing material support to an organization that is deeply embedded in the state’s response to a conflict in which it is a primary combatant.

In contrast, there is no evidence that American Express has provided equivalent support to the humanitarian organizations serving Gaza, such as Doctors Without Borders (MSF) or Oxfam, which have been vocal about the “engineered humanitarian catastrophe”.²⁶ The absence of support for these organizations, which are documenting and responding to the destruction of the Gaza health system, indicates a profound philanthropic bias.

Comparison to Ukraine Philanthropy

During the Ukraine crisis, American Express’s philanthropy was aligned with a global movement to provide aid to victims of an “unjustified” invasion.²² The aid was framed through the lens of international law and the protection of refugees. In the Israel-Gaza context, the aid is framed as a response to “terrorism,” with the primary beneficiaries being the national institutions of the state partner.²⁵ This shift from “Refugee Support” (Ukraine) to “National Defense Support” (Israel) further highlights the political nature of the corporation’s charitable giving.

1. American Express Company – Governance & Corporate …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://ir.americanexpress.com/governance-and-corporate-responsibility/executive-committee-and-directors/default.aspx
2. Stephen Squeri – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Squeri
3. Stephen J. Squeri – Chairman & CEO at American Express | The Org, accessed January 31, 2026, https://theorg.com/org/american-express/org-chart/stephen-j-squeri
4. American Express Company (AXP) Leadership & Management Team Analysis, accessed January 31, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/diversified-financials/nyse-axp/american-express/management
5. Governance & Corporate Responsibility – Policy Engagement and Political Activity, accessed January 31, 2026, https://ir.americanexpress.com/governance-and-corporate-responsibility/policy-engagement-and-political-activity/default.aspx
6. US, Israel set up program to forge closer economic ties, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-israel-set-up-program-to-forge-closer-economic-ties/
7. American Express 2024 Climate Lobbying – CorpGov.net: Corporations are not Democratic-Free Zones, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.corpgov.net/2024/05/american-express-2024-climate-lobbying/
8. AXA DIVEST | BDS Movement, accessed January 31, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/axa-divest
9. Philanthropy And Voluntarism Among The Jews – CUNY Graduate Center, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.gc.cuny.edu/sites/default/files/2021-05/FG_small_PhilanthropyandVoluntarismAmongtheJews.pdf
10. FEC Filing Shows AIPAC Made Record Donations to Congress in November | Truthout, accessed January 31, 2026, https://truthout.org/articles/fec-filing-shows-aipac-made-record-donations-to-congress-in-november/
11. Israel Charges “american Express” with Yielding to Anti-israel Boycott, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.jta.org/archive/israel-charges-american-express-with-yielding-to-anti-israel-boycott
12. American Express Israel Ltd. – IVC Data & Insights, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ivc-online.com/Google-Card?ID=cd4e415f-63d1-ee11-b812-00505695cd29&type=1
13. American Express shuts down Amex Israel, lays off entire workforce | Ctech, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/qtny02gnt
14. American Express – Digital operation for Small Business Day – Rabbi Interactive Agency, accessed January 31, 2026, https://rabbi.agency/project/95/american_express_israel
15. American Express – Small Business Day – Rabbi Interactive Agency, accessed January 31, 2026, https://rabbi.agency/project/1/small-business-day
16. Release of long-delayed UN settlement database significant step towards holding Israel accountable | BDS Movement, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.bdsmovement.net/news/release-long-delayed-un-settlement-database-significant-step-towards-holding-israel-accountable
17. AXA triples investment in Israeli banks financing illegal settlements on eve of annexation, accessed January 31, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/axa-triples-investment-israeli-banks-financing-illegal-settlements-eve-annexation
18. Bankrolling Abuse: Israeli Banks in West Bank Settlements | HRW, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/05/29/bankrolling-abuse/israeli-banks-west-bank-settlements
19. Israeli illegal settlements – Bank Track, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.banktrack.org/project/illegal_israeli_settlements
20. American Express Human Rights Statement, accessed January 31, 2026, https://s26.q4cdn.com/747928648/files/doc_downloads/governance/2025/02/American-Express-Human-Rights-Statement.pdf
21. The Israel-America Chamber of Commerce – WELCOME TO THE U.S.-ISRAEL BUSINESS INITIATIVE – Amcham Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://amcham.co.il/117-networking/216-welcome-to-the-u-s-israel-business-initiative
22. American Express suspending ‘all operations’ in Russia, Belarus – sharqetrade.com, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.sharqetrade.com/en/news–events/market-news/american-express-suspending-%E2%80%98all-operations%E2%80%99-in-russia-belarus
23. Mastercard, Visa and American Express to suspend Russian operations, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.businesstravelnewseurope.com/Payment-Expense/Mastercard-Visa-and-American-Express-to-suspend-Russian-operations
24. Russia Revokes American Express Bank License – The Moscow Times, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/08/13/russia-revokes-american-express-bank-license-a86005
25. Statement on Actions In Response to Terrorist Attacks on Israel – WebWire, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=312543
26. International reactions to the Gaza war – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_Gaza_war
27. Gaza joint statement: Israel threatens to ban major aid organizations as starvation deepens | Americares, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.americares.org/news/gaza-joint-statement-israel-threatens-to-ban-major-aid-organizations-as-starvation-deepens/
28. Congress must uphold US law and suspend security assistance to Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/congress-must-uphold-us-law-and-suspend-security-assistance-israel
29. MSF response to the Israel-Gaza war | Doctors Without Borders – USA, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/our-response-israel-gaza-war
30. AMEX-Code-of-Conduct-Policy_English.pdf, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.americanexpress.com/content/dam/amex/en-us/newsroom/pdfs/AMEX-Code-of-Conduct-Policy_English.pdf
31. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY CODE OF CONDUCT, accessed January 31, 2026, http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/64/64467/2007_axp_coc.pdf
32. Why pro-Palestine protesters rallied outside an Israeli-owned eatery in Philadelphia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-why-pro-palestine-goldie-protesters-rallied-outside-israeli-owned-eatery-philadelphia
33. Apple workers are speaking up in solidarity with Palestine | Mashable, accessed January 31, 2026, https://mashable.com/article/apple-employees-palestine-tim-cook-open-letter
34. Turmoil and Resignations Over Palestine Support at Manhattan’s 92NY – Hyperallergic, accessed January 31, 2026, https://hyperallergic.com/turmoil-resignations-over-palestine-support-manhattan-92ny/
35. Here Is All the Money AIPAC Spent on the 2024 Elections – Sludge, accessed January 31, 2026, https://readsludge.com/2025/01/24/here-is-all-the-money-aipac-spent-on-the-2024-elections/
36. AIPAC Gives Millions in PAC Donations to House Allies, Senators in 2026 Races – Sludge, accessed January 31, 2026, https://readsludge.com/2025/07/25/aipac-gives-millions-in-pac-donations-to-house-allies-senators-in-2026-races/
37. Israel and Hamas October 2023 Conflict: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47754
38. United States support for Israel in the Gaza war – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Gaza_war
39. Agreement between the U.S. and Israel on Cooperating in Science and Technology for Homeland Security Matters, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/agreement_us_israel_sciencetech_cooperation_2008-05-29.pdf
40. Israel, US ink new cybersecurity collaboration deals to combat threats, bolster R&D, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-us-ink-new-cybersecurity-collaboration-deals-to-combat-threats-bolster-rd/
41. Treasury Exposes and Disrupts Hamas’s Covert Support Network, accessed January 31, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0368