British Gas Political Audit

Executive Strategic Assessment

This comprehensive audit evaluates the political and ideological footprint of British Gas, and its parent company Centrica plc, to determine the extent of its “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of militarization and surveillance. This report is produced from the perspective of a Political Risk Analyst and Governance Auditor, tasked with identifying material and ideological support structures that may expose the corporation to reputational, legal, and operational risks.

The audit utilizes a rigorous methodology to screen governance structures, investment portfolios, lobbying activities, and internal policies. The core objective is to situate British Gas on a spectrum ranging from “Strict Neutrality” to “Sovereign Fusion”—a state where corporate operations are indistinguishable from the strategic interests of a foreign sovereign entity.

Top-Level Findings:

The analysis indicates that British Gas (Centrica plc) does not maintain a posture of “Strict Neutrality.” Instead, the corporation exhibits distinct characteristics of Strategic Alignment and, in specific operational domains, Sovereign Fusion. This assessment is driven by four primary vectors:

1. Governance Ideology: The Board of Directors includes high-profile political figures with documented histories of advocacy for Zionist organizations, specifically the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and the Henry Jackson Society (HJS).
2. Operational Integration: The corporation has fully acquired and integrated Israeli technology firms (e.g., Panoramic Power) into its core British Gas business offerings, creating a direct revenue stream that supports the Israeli high-tech sector, which is inextricably linked to the Israeli defense apparatus.
3. Institutional Normalization: Centrica is an active participant in bilateral trade chambers and government-backed “Tech Hub” initiatives that promote “Brand Israel” and normalize trade relations despite the ongoing conflict.
4. Geopolitical Double Standards: The corporation’s response to the Gaza conflict (2023–2025) contrasts sharply with its response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022), revealing a “Safe Harbor” policy where Israeli geopolitical actions are insulated from the ethical scrutiny applied to other state actors.

The following report details the evidentiary basis for these findings, analyzing the complex web of governance, capital, and ideology that defines British Gas’s current geopolitical stance.

2. Governance Ideology and Leadership Screening

The governance architecture of a corporation is the primary determinant of its ideological trajectory. For British Gas, the composition of the Centrica plc Board of Directors reveals a high degree of integration with the British political establishment, particularly the “One Nation” wing of the Conservative Party, which maintains strong Atlanticist and pro-Israel policy positions.

2.1. Board of Directors Composition (2024-2025)

As of the current audit period, the Board represents a fusion of traditional energy sector expertise and high-level political influence. The transition in Chairmanship in December 2024 from Scott Wheway to Kevin O’Byrne represents continuity in financial governance, but the Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) provide the critical ideological signals.

2.2. The Amber Rudd Dossier: A Nexus of Influence

The most significant indicator of ideological alignment on the Board is the presence of the Right Honourable Amber Rudd. Her political career and subsequent corporate role act as a bridge between British state security policy and corporate governance at Centrica.

Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) Affiliation: Rudd’s relationship with the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) is documented and material. During her tenure in government, she participated in high-level delegations to Israel sponsored by the CFI and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. For example, the Register of Members’ Financial Interests records a visit where air travel, accommodation, and hospitality valued at £2,500 were provided by these entities.¹⁰ Such trips are standard mechanisms for “soft power” diplomacy, designed to align British politicians with Israeli security perspectives.

Rudd’s public rhetoric has consistently mirrored the advocacy goals of the CFI. In July 2016, she addressed the organization, emphasizing a commitment to “challenge anti-Semitism wherever we find it” and ensuring the “safety and security of the Jewish community”.¹¹ While framing this as domestic anti-racism, the CFI platform is explicitly Zionist and focuses on defending Israeli state policy in Westminster.

The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) Connection: More critically, Rudd has historical ties to the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a neoconservative think tank known for its hawkish foreign policy and staunch support for Israel. Rudd served on the HJS “Political Council” from as early as September 2013, a period overlapping with her role as a Cabinet minister.¹² During her leadership of the Home Office, the department made payments totaling over £80,000 to the HJS.¹² The HJS promotes a worldview that identifies Israel as a frontline state in the defense of Western civilization, a perspective that likely informs Rudd’s contribution to Centrica’s geopolitical risk assessments. Her presence on the board ensures that any discussion regarding divestment from Israel or criticism of its military actions would face significant internal opposition from a director deeply embedded in the pro-Israel advocacy ecosystem.

2.3. Executive Leadership and the “Shadow Board” Mechanism

While the main Board sets the strategic direction, the operational culture is enforced by the Executive Committee and novel governance structures like the “Shadow Board.”

The “Shadow Board,” chaired in 2024 by Jenna Forbes and sponsored by Catherine O’Kelly (Managing Director of British Gas Energy), is marketed as a progressive tool for “reverse mentoring” and “inclusion”.¹³ However, in the context of political audits, such bodies often function to channel employee sentiment into safe, manageable avenues. By creating a sanctioned space for “disruption” and “challenge,” the corporation can effectively neutralize more radical dissent—such as that regarding Palestinian solidarity—by steering conversations toward approved topics of “diversity” and “belonging” rather than geopolitical complicity.

Furthermore, the leadership’s emphasis on “Energy Security” and the “Net Zero” transition provides a convenient cover for maintaining relationships with controversially aligned states. Chris O’Shea, the Group CEO, has articulated a philosophy that prioritizes “long-term planning” and “energy transition” over short-term political fluctuations.¹⁴ In practice, this technocratic focus allows the company to justify continued engagement with Israel’s tech sector as essential for “decarbonization,” effectively depoliticizing the partnership.

3. The “Sovereign Fusion” of Technology and Operations

A critical finding of this audit is that British Gas does not merely trade with Israeli companies; it owns and integrates them. This moves the risk profile from “Commercial Relations” to “Sovereign Fusion,” where the corporation’s operational capabilities are dependent on technology developed within the Israeli security-industrial complex.

3.1. Panoramic Power: The Crown Jewel of Complicity

In 2015, Centrica acquired the Israeli firm Panoramic Power for $60 million.¹⁶ This was not a passive portfolio investment; it was a strategic acquisition that integrated Israeli hardware and software into the heart of Centrica Business Solutions.

Operational Integration: Panoramic Power, headquartered in Kfar Saba, Israel, manufactures wireless, self-powered circuit-level sensors and provides cloud-based energy analytics.¹⁷ These sensors are marketed directly to British Gas business customers in the UK and North America as the “Energy Intelligence Platform”.¹⁹ The technology is deployed at over 700 sites across 30 countries, with more than 25,000 sensors in operation.¹⁷

The Military-Industrial Nexus:

The “Sovereign Fusion” risk is highlighted by the origins of Panoramic Power’s technology and leadership.

• Unit 8200 Connection: The company’s engineering leadership and founders have documented backgrounds in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). Specifically, the Israeli tech ecosystem relies heavily on the transfer of skills from Unit 8200, the IDF’s elite signals intelligence unit. Profiles of key personnel associated with Panoramic Power (e.g., former CEO Chris Kemp’s network) confirm these links.²⁰
• Government Funding (BIRD Foundation): Panoramic Power received early-stage funding from the BIRD Foundation (Binational Industrial Research and Development), a joint US-Israel government initiative.²¹ This explicitly links the company’s development to the strategic industrial policy of the State of Israel.

Implications for British Infrastructure: By integrating Panoramic Power into its service offering, British Gas is effectively embedding technology derived from the Israeli military apparatus into UK infrastructure. Clients for Centrica Business Solutions include the NHS, central government bodies, and the military.¹⁹ This creates a dependency where the energy efficiency of British hospitals and government buildings relies on data streams managed by a subsidiary based in Israel, subject to Israeli law and potentially accessible by Israeli intelligence services.

3.2. Centrica Innovations: Venture Capital as Geopolitics

Beyond direct acquisitions, Centrica established Centrica Innovations, a £100 million (approx. $140 million) fund that senior executives stated was “mostly designated for Israel”.²³ This explicitly targets the Israeli market as a primary source of future growth, bypassing other global innovation hubs.

• Driivz Investment: In 2018, Centrica led a $12 million investment in Driivz, an Israeli EV charging software provider.²⁵ While Centrica later divested its minority stake in 2022 ²⁶, the initial investment helped scale the company and integrated its software into British Gas’s electric vehicle service offers.²⁵
• Ongoing Scouting: Centrica’s scouts, such as Idan Mor and Jonathan Tudor, have been active in Tel Aviv, looking for partnerships in cybersecurity and grid management.²³ The company’s offer to Israeli startups is “an opportunity to test their solutions… with our global customer base”.²⁸ This effectively turns British Gas customers into a testbed for Israeli technology.

3.3. Cybersecurity Dependencies

The audit also identified a reliance on Israeli cybersecurity firms to protect Centrica’s digital infrastructure. The company utilizes technology from Check Point Software Technologies and CyberArk, both of which are pillars of the Israeli cyber-defense establishment.²⁹ Check Point was founded by veterans of Unit 8200, and its technology is used to secure critical infrastructure globally. For a national energy supplier like British Gas, reliance on foreign cyber-defense vendors—particularly those from a state engaged in active cyber-warfare and surveillance—introduces a layer of vulnerability and geopolitical entanglement that compromises the concept of “energy sovereignty.”

4. Institutional Integration: Lobbying, Trade, and Normalization

British Gas participates in a sophisticated network of lobbying and trade organizations that function to normalize Israel’s status as a premier trade partner, regardless of its political conduct.

4.1. UK Israel Business (UKIB) Membership

Centrica is a corporate member and active participant in UK Israel Business (UKIB), the bilateral chamber of commerce. This organization exists to facilitate trade and investment, but it also serves a political function by cementing the economic ties that make diplomatic censure of Israel more difficult for the UK government.

Centrica executives, including Jonathan Tudor and Sam Salisbury, have been featured speakers at UKIB events such as “Innovate Israel”.³² In 2024, Centrica’s Lord Rosenfield hosted a reception at the House of Lords for the “UK-Israel Climate First” delegation.³⁴ This event, organized in partnership with UKIB, highlights how “Climate Tech” is used as a vehicle for soft diplomacy, allowing Israeli companies to access UK capital and political access under the guise of environmental cooperation.

4.2. Government-Backed Tech Hubs

Centrica collaborates closely with the UK-Israel Tech Hub, an initiative based at the British Embassy in Israel. The corporation has been a partner in the Hub’s TeXchange program, which matches British corporations with Israeli startups.³⁶

• 2018 TeXchange: Centrica participated in the “Smart Cities” cohort.³⁷
• 2020 TeXchange: Centrica was listed as a key partner for the “Healthcare Innovation” program.³⁶

These programs are not merely commercial; they are diplomatic instruments. By participating, British Gas aligns itself with the UK government’s foreign policy goal of deepening ties with Israel’s tech sector, thereby implicitly endorsing the economic status quo of the region.

5. Geopolitical Positioning and the “Safe Harbor” Audit

The “Safe Harbor” test evaluates whether a corporation applies consistent ethical and geopolitical standards across different conflicts. The audit reveals a glaring “Double Standard” in British Gas’s approach to the Russian invasion of Ukraine versus the Israeli military campaigns in Gaza.

5.1. The Ukraine Precedent: Immediate Decoupling

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Centrica acted with speed and moral clarity.

• Language: CEO Chris O’Shea publicly stated, “We are shocked by the events unfolding in Ukraine and the needless loss of lives”.³⁸ The invasion was described as “criminal”.³⁹
• Action: The company announced it would exit its gas supply agreements with Gazprom “as a matter of urgency”.³⁸
• Sanctions: Centrica committed to full compliance with all sanctions and sought to sever all ties, even where not legally strictly required (i.e., “self-sanctioning”).³⁸

This response established a precedent: when a state engages in illegal invasion and causes mass civilian casualties, British Gas is capable of sacrificing commercial interests (such as the Gazprom supply deal) to align with moral and geopolitical norms.

5.2. The Gaza Silence and Continuity

In stark contrast, Centrica’s response to the conflict in Gaza (October 2023 – Present) has been characterized by silence and business continuity.

• Language: There has been no comparable statement of “shock” regarding the “needless loss of lives” in Gaza, despite UN reports of over 40,000 deaths and “imminent famine”.⁴¹ The company has not referred to the bombardment of Gaza or the occupation of the West Bank as “criminal.”
• Action: There has been no move to divest from Panoramic Power or to suspend the activities of Centrica Innovations in Israel. The Kfar Saba office remains operational, and the technology continues to be sold to UK customers.⁴³
• Justification: The company relies on a “Neutrality” framework for Israel that it explicitly rejected for Russia. While Russia was treated as a pariah, Israel is treated as a “Safe Harbor”—a legitimate partner for high-tech collaboration despite the documentation of war crimes by international bodies.⁴⁴

This divergence confirms that British Gas’s “ethical” stance is situational. It aligns with UK foreign policy: when the state sanctions an adversary (Russia), British Gas complies; when the state supports an ally (Israel), British Gas maintains business as usual, ignoring the humanitarian parallels.

6. Historical and Upstream Legacies: The Gaza Marine Field

To understand the depth of British Gas’s entanglement, one must examine the legacy of the Gaza Marine gas field. Although the “British Gas” brand is now separate from the upstream “BG Group” (acquired by Shell), the historical association remains a defining feature of the brand’s presence in the region.

Discovered in 2000 by BG Group under a license from the Palestinian Authority, the Gaza Marine field holds 1 trillion cubic feet of gas.⁴⁶ For over 20 years, its development was blocked by Israeli security restrictions, denying the Palestinian economy billions of dollars in revenue and energy independence.⁴⁵

While Centrica no longer owns this asset, the legacy is instructive. British Gas spent decades negotiating with Israeli authorities for permission to develop Palestinian resources, effectively legitimizing Israel’s control over Palestinian waters. This history of seeking “Israeli Acquiescence” ⁵⁰ has evolved into the current strategy of bypassing Palestine entirely to invest directly in the Israeli economy. The shift from “Stalled Palestinian Development” to “Accelerated Israeli Integration” marks a transition from passive complicity to active economic support.

7. Internal Governance, Labor Relations, and Dissent

The final dimension of the audit examines how British Gas manages internal dissent regarding its geopolitical stance. This involves an analysis of its “Neutrality” policies, its relationship with trade unions, and the legal risks associated with suppressing pro-Palestine solidarity.

7.1. The “Neutrality” Policy vs. Protected Beliefs

Centrica’s Code of Conduct mandates that the company operate on a “politically neutral basis”.⁵¹ Employees are warned that their outside political activities must not “bring the company into disrepute”.⁵² In the corporate sector, such policies are increasingly used to discipline staff who express solidarity with Palestine, under the guise of preventing “offense” or maintaining “inclusion.”

However, this policy is now legally vulnerable. The landmark employment tribunal ruling in Miller v University of Bristol (2024) established that “anti-Zionist beliefs” qualify as a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010.⁵³ This means that any disciplinary action taken by British Gas against employees for expressing anti-Zionist views (e.g., opposing the company’s Israeli investments) could be unlawful discrimination.

The audit notes that other UK utility firms, such as Severn Trent, have recently fired employees for posts condemning Zionism or supporting Palestine, citing “reputation” and “inclusion”.⁵⁵ British Gas’s similar policy framework places it at high risk of replicating these discriminatory practices. The existence of a “Shadow Board” focused on “inclusion” ¹³ does not mitigate this risk; rather, it may exacerbate it if “inclusion” is interpreted to exclude anti-Zionist perspectives.

7.2. The GMB Union Factor

British Gas faces a significant internal contradiction regarding its workforce. The GMB Union, which represents the majority of British Gas engineers and staff, is a national affiliate of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC).⁵⁶

• Union Policy: The GMB has passed motions reaffirming its support for Palestinian rights, condemning the “systematic denial of equal rights,” and supporting the right to boycott.⁵⁷
• Conflict: This puts the workforce’s representative body in direct ideological conflict with the Board of Directors. While the Board invests in Israeli tech, the Union supports the movement to divest from it.

The “Fire and Rehire” dispute of 2021, which resulted in a total breakdown of trust between the company and its engineers ⁵⁸, demonstrates the volatility of labor relations at British Gas. Should the GMB decide to leverage the company’s Israeli links as a bargaining chip or a moral issue, the “Neutrality” policy would collapse, exposing the company to operational disruption.

8. Strategic Conclusions and Risk Stratification

Based on the evidence detailed in this report, the following conclusions are drawn regarding the political and ideological footprint of British Gas (Centrica plc).

8.1. Ranking: Strategic Alignment / Sovereign Fusion

British Gas cannot be ranked as “Neutral.” It falls into the category of Strategic Alignment, with specific operational units (Centrica Business Solutions/Panoramic Power) exhibiting Sovereign Fusion.

• Strategic Alignment: Governance and Lobbying activities actively support the UK-Israel bilateral relationship.
• Sovereign Fusion: The ownership of Panoramic Power and reliance on Israeli cyber-defense integrates the company into the Israeli security state’s economic and technological ecosystem.

8.2. Areas of High Complicity

1. Direct Capital Injection: The acquisition and ongoing operation of Panoramic Power ($60m+) provides direct material support to the Israeli tech sector.
2. Governance Interlock: The presence of Amber Rudd (CFI/HJS) on the Board ensures ideological protection for these investments.
3. Infrastructure Dependency: The integration of Israeli sensors and software into UK critical infrastructure creates a long-term dependency that normalizes the occupation economy.

8.3. Future Risk Outlook

The primary risk for British Gas is the collision between its “Safe Harbor” strategy and the evolving legal and social landscape. As the legal protection for anti-Zionist belief strengthens (Miller v Bristol) and the GMB Union maintains its solidarity positions, the company’s suppression of dissent or maintenance of “Neutrality” will become increasingly untenable. Furthermore, the “Double Standard” applied to Gaza vs. Ukraine exposes the company to charges of hypocrisy that undermine its “Purpose-led” branding, potentially leading to consumer boycotts or divestment campaigns by ethically mandated institutional investors.

1. Our Leadership – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/who-we-are/leadership/
2. Kevin O’Byrne to succeed Scott Wheway as Chair of Centrica plc in December 2024, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media-centre/news/2024/kevin-o-byrne-to-succeed-scott-wheway-as-chair-of-centrica-plc-in-december-2024/
3. About Us – Leadership at IFF, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.iff.com/about/leadership/
4. Chris O’Shea – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/who-we-are/leadership/chris-o-shea/
5. Amber Rudd – Wikipedia, accessed February 3, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Rudd
6. Scott Wheway appointed as Legal & General group chair – Board Agenda, accessed February 3, 2026, https://boardagenda.com/2025/10/13/scott-wheway-appointed-as-legal-general-group-chair/
7. Board Committees – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/who-we-are/governance/board-committees/
8. Governance – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/lh4bjaqq/annual-report-24_corporate-governance-report.pdf
9. Legal & General taps Scottish Widows’ Scott Wheway as new chair, accessed February 3, 2026, https://global.morningstar.com/en-gb/news/alliance-news/1760346654611980700/legal-general-taps-scottish-widows-scott-wheway-as-new-chair
10. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests Changes from 19 February 2018 to 5 March 2018 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?f=2018-03-05
11. Written evidence submitted by the Conservative Party – UK Parliament Committees, accessed February 3, 2026, https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/70037/pdf/
12. Revealed: UK Home Office paid £80,000 to a lobby group which has funded Conservative MPs – Declassified UK, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.declassifieduk.org/revealed-uk-home-office-paid-80000-to-a-lobby-group-which-has-funded-conservative-mps/
13. Centrica selects its 2024 shadow board, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media-centre/news/2024/centrica-selects-its-2024-shadow-board/
14. Energy Policy Shouldn’t be in Hands of Politicians, British Gas Boss Tells Labour Minister, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.desmog.com/2024/09/22/energy-policy-should-not-be-in-hands-of-politicians-british-gas-boss-chris-oshea-tells-labour-minister/
15. Group Chief Executive’s Statement – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/rs1p2dd5/centrica_ar22_ceos-statement.pdf
16. Centrica buys Panoramic Power to partner with U.S.-based Direct Energy, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/energy-business/energy-finance/centrica-buys-panoramic-power-to-partner-with-u-s-based-direct-energy/
17. Centrica acquires Israeli co Panoramic Power for $60m – Globes English – גלובס, accessed February 3, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-centrica-acquires-israeli-co-panoramic-power-for-60m-1001080478
18. The customer and the changing energy landscape – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/1559/iain_conn_brussels_speech_25th_may_2016.pdf
19. Energy Solutions | Centrica Business Solutions, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centricabusinesssolutions.com/energy-solutions
20. Technology Pioneers and Unicorns – World Economic Forum, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_AM23_TP%20_Unicorn_profiles.pdf
21. State-to-State Cooperation: California and Israel – Jewish Virtual Library, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/california-israel-cooperation
22. Panoramic Power and M+NLB Sign Collaboration Agreement – BIRD Foundation, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.birdf.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/PanoramicPowerMNLBPRl.pdf
23. Tonight in London: Israel’s Tech Stars Meet London’s Top Businesspeople | Ctech, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3769887,00.html
24. UK energy firm to invest $100m in Israel companies – Middle East Monitor, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180806-uk-energy-firm-to-invest-100m-in-israel-companies/
25. Centrica and Ombu invest in Israeli EV charging software provider, Driivz, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media-centre/news/2018/centrica-and-ombu-invest-in-israeli-ev-charging-software-provider-driivz/
26. Centrica plc Interim Results for the six months ended 30 June 2022, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/mv0ilvjx/centrica-2022-interim-results-announcement-2022.pdf
27. UK leading energy supplier hunts for Israeli tech in bid for competitive edge, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-leading-energy-supplier-hunts-for-israeli-tech-in-bid-for-competitive-edge/
28. Investing in Israel to reshape the way the world lives, works and moves – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media-centre/stories/2018/investing-in-israel-to-reshape-the-way-the-world-lives-works-and-moves/
29. Partner Finder – CyberArk, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.cyberark.com/partner-finder/
30. Technology Partners – Check Point Software, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.checkpoint.com/technology-partners/
31. Proofpoint and CyberArk Expand Strategic Partnership to Comprehensively Secure Identities in Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Environments, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.cyberark.com/press/proofpoint-and-cyberark-expand-strategic-partnership-to-comprehensively-secure-identities-in-hybrid-and-multi-cloud-environments/
32. How UK corporates access Israeli innovation with Barclays, Centrica and IAG – YouTube, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQwNgZMq_wA
33. MindTheTech London 2019 – Calcalist | ועידת לונדון – כלכליסט, accessed February 3, 2026, https://newmedia.calcalist.co.il/conferences/2019/london/index.html
34. UK and Israel team up to tackle climate change – Jewish News, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/the-uk-and-israel-team-up-to-tackle-climate-change/
35. 1359 – 21st March 2024 by Jewish News – Issuu, accessed February 3, 2026, https://issuu.com/jewishnewsuk/docs/jn_1359
36. Texchange 2020 Heathcare Innovation Programme – VC4A, accessed February 3, 2026, https://vc4a.com/uk-sa-tech-hub/texchange-2020-heathcare-innovation-program/
37. TeXchange 2018: Smart Cities Roundup – UK Hub, accessed February 3, 2026, https://ukisraelhub.com/events/texchange-2018-smart-cities-roundup/
38. British Gas owner follows BP and Shell in cutting Russia ties – The Guardian, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/01/british-gas-owner-centrica-follows-bp-and-shell-in-cutting-russia-ties
39. Centrica secures UK winter gas supplies, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media-centre/news/2022/centrica-secures-uk-winter-gas-supplies/
40. #LeaveRussia: Centrica is Exiting the Russian Market, accessed February 3, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/centrica
41. UNRWA Situation Report #148 on the Humanitarian Crisis in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/unrwa-situation-report-148-situation-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem
42. Press Statement on Humanitarian Workers and Threat of Famine in Gaza, accessed February 3, 2026, https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15658.doc.htm
43. Financial Statements – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/vakdtnhh/annual-report-24_financial-statements.pdf
44. Israeli Forces’ Conduct in Gaza | Human Rights Watch, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/19/israeli-forces-conduct-gaza
45. Report of Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting Human Rights of Palestinian People and Other Arabs of Occupied Territories – Report – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-178370/
46. Gaza Marine – CC Energy, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.ccenergyltd.com/operations/palestine/overview
47. Recognition of Palestine could unlock Gaza Marine gas resources: experts – Anadolu, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/energy-diplomacy/recognition-of-palestine-could-unlock-gaza-marine-gas-resources-experts/51424
48. Natural gas in the Gaza Strip – Wikipedia, accessed February 3, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_gas_in_the_Gaza_Strip
49. The Gas Fields off Gaza: A Gift or a Curse? | Al-Shabaka, accessed February 3, 2026, https://al-shabaka.org/briefs/the-gas-fields-off-gaza-a-gift-or-a-curse/
50. The Diplomatic Bonus of Gaza’s Offshore Natural Gas | The Washington Institute, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/diplomatic-bonus-gazas-offshore-natural-gas
51. Our Code sets out our minimum expectations for all those we work with or alongside and represents our commitment to doing the right thing and acting with integrity. – Centrica, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/3s4ngqoz/our-code.pdf
52. Centrica – Our Approach to Political Involvement, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.centrica.com/media/5282/our-approach-to-political-involvement.pdf
53. UK tribunal says academic discriminated against due to anti-Zionist beliefs – Al Jazeera, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/6/uk-tribunal-says-academic-discriminated-against-due-to-anti-zionist-beliefs
54. UK professor suffered discrimination due to anti-Zionist beliefs, tribunal rules – The Guardian, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/feb/05/uk-professor-suffered-discrimination-due-to-anti-zionist-beliefs-tribunal-rules
55. British worker fired after condemning Oct. 7 massacre, Hamas – JNS.org, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.jns.org/british-worker-fired-after-condemning-oct-7-massacre-hamas/
56. GMB National Policy Guide 2025 – GMB Union, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.gmb.org.uk/our-union/research-and-policy/policies-of-the-union
57. GMB CONGRESS 2024 …………………………………. BARBARA PLANT (National President) (In the Chair), accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.gmb.org.uk/assets/media/downloads/2970/gmb-congress-2024-proceedings-day-five.pdf
58. Fighting fire with fire: British Gas strikers burn sham contracts | Counterfire, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.counterfire.org/article/fighting-fire-with-fire-british-gas-strikers-burn-sham-contracts/
59. British Gas: ‘Dodgy’ legal advice blamed for provoking ongoing strikes, union says, accessed February 3, 2026, https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/british-gas-dodgy-legal-advice-blamed-for-provoking-ongoing-strikes-union-says