Burberry Political Audit

Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 Audit Mandate and Scope

This report constitutes a forensic audit of Burberry Group plc (“Burberry” or “The Company”) designed to evaluate the extent of its political complicity regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The audit was commissioned under strict instructions to identify material, operational, or ideological support for systems of occupation, surveillance, or militarization. The scope encompasses a “whole-of-entity” analysis, scrutinizing executive leadership, institutional ownership, franchise operations, supply chain logistics, and technological dependencies.

The analysis is anchored in the “Safe Harbor” Stress Test, a methodological framework that assesses corporate geopolitical consistency. By contrasting Burberry’s swift, moralized exit from the Russian market in 2022 with its continued operations in Israel during the 2023–2024 Gaza conflict, the audit establishes a baseline for evaluating the Company’s adherence to its own stated values of “neutrality” and “human rights.” Furthermore, the report interrogates the Company’s reliance on Israeli technology firms with documented ties to the defense establishment, thereby assessing the “dual-use” risk of its digital transformation strategy.

1.2 Top-Level Findings

The audit concludes that while Burberry’s executive leadership does not exhibit an overt, ideologically Zionist agenda, the Company is Structurally Complicit through its operational ecosystem. The brand acts as a normalizing agent for the occupation economy through its franchise partnerships and supply chain integration.

• Governance Ideology (Low Risk): There is no definitive evidence linking the current Chairman, Dr. Gerry Murphy, or CEO, Joshua Schulman, to hardline Zionist advocacy groups such as AIPAC or the JNF. Potential flags regarding the Chairman’s association with the “Conservative Friends of Israel” were subjected to forensic verification and determined to likely be cases of name conflation with political figures or trade union officials of the same name.
• Operational Complicity (Critical Risk): Burberry’s exclusive franchise partner in Israel, Factory 54 (Irani Corp), actively leverages the brand’s retail presence to support the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), including hosting morale events for military families during active combat periods. Furthermore, the partner operates retail outlets in the Mamilla Mall, located in the sensitive “No Man’s Land” bordering occupied East Jerusalem, directly implicating Burberry in the normalization of annexed territory.
• Supply Chain Entanglement (High Risk): The Company maintains a sourcing relationship with Delta Galil Industries, a manufacturer with a documented history of operating facilities in illegal West Bank settlements (e.g., Barkan Industrial Zone). This directly contradicts Burberry’s “Ethical Trading” protocols.
• The “Safe Harbor” Failure (Severe Governance Finding): The audit identifies a glaring “Double Standard.” Burberry mobilized significant corporate resources and public rhetoric to condemn the invasion of Ukraine, yet has maintained absolute public silence and operational continuity regarding Gaza. This discrepancy reveals that the Company’s “human rights” framework is selectively applied based on geopolitical alignment rather than universal ethical principles.

2. Governance Ideology: The Leadership and Ownership Screening

The first dimension of this audit assesses whether the strategic direction of Burberry is influenced by the personal ideological commitments of its leadership or the coercive power of its owners. This requires a forensic screening of the Board of Directors and major shareholders for affiliations with Zionist advocacy groups or documented histories of pro-Israel lobbying.

2.1 The Board of Directors: Forensic Profile Analysis

The Board of Directors represents the ultimate decision-making body of the Company. If the Board is compromised by ideological advocacy, corporate neutrality is impossible.

2.1.1 Chairman of the Board: Dr. Gerry Murphy

Dr. Gerry Murphy was appointed Chair in 2018. His background is firmly rooted in the Anglo-Irish corporate establishment, with previous chairmanships at Tate & Lyle, The Blackstone Group International, and currently, Tesco plc.¹

The “Conservative Friends of Israel” (CFI) Investigation:

Initial intelligence screenings flagged potential records linking a “Gerry Murphy” to delegations organized by the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), a powerful lobbying group within the UK Conservative Party. The CFI organizes “fact-finding” missions for MPs and influential business figures to garner support for Israeli government policy.

• Forensic Verification: An analysis of parliamentary registers and lobbying disclosures ³ reveals multiple entries for “Gerry Murphy.” However, a rigorous cross-reference of biographical data suggests a high probability of identity conflation.
  • One “Gerry Murphy” identified in the context of political delegations is a senior trade unionist (Northern Secretary of the Irish National Teachers Organisation and President of the ICTU).⁶ This individual has participated in political delegations to Israel and the West Bank, often with a focus on labor rights and education, distinct from the corporate lobbying agenda of the CFI.
  • Another “Gerry Murphy” associated with political donations appears in registers that are often linked to parliamentary candidates or local councilors rather than FTSE 100 Chairmen.
• Conclusion on Chairman: There is no credible evidence in the reviewed material ⁸ that Dr. Gerry Murphy, the businessman and Chair of Burberry, is an active member of the CFI or has used his corporate platform to advocate for Zionism. His public profile is characteristically technocratic, focused on shareholder value and corporate governance rather than geopolitical advocacy. The risk of ideological capture at the Chairman level is therefore assessed as Low.

2.1.2 Chief Executive Officer: Joshua Schulman

Appointed CEO in July 2024, Joshua Schulman is an American luxury retail veteran with a resume including Michael Kors, Coach, and Bergdorf Goodman.²

Ideological Footprint Analysis:

• Professional Background: Schulman’s career has been centered in New York’s high-fashion ecosystem. While this sector has deep historical ties to philanthropy supporting Israel, Schulman’s own public footprint is rigorously commercial.
• Advocacy Screening: Searches for affiliations with organizations such as the Jewish National Fund (JNF), the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), or AIPAC yielded negative results. His public statements focus exclusively on “brand transformation,” “cultural relevance,” and “heritage”.¹¹
• Contextual Risk: While Schulman does not appear to be an ideological activist, his previous leadership roles at Michael Kors and Coach ¹³ involved overseeing supply chains and retail networks that also operate in Israel. This suggests a “business-as-usual” mindset regarding the region. Under his tenure at these brands, there is no record of him challenging the status quo of operating in occupied territories. His appointment at Burberry likely signals a continuation of this passive acceptance rather than an active ideological pivot.

2.1.3 Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)

The audit screened the broader board for potential advocacy links.

• Orna Ni-Chionna: A former Director. Her name suggests potential Irish or Hebrew linguistic roots, but a review of her voting records ¹⁴ in various corporate capacities (e.g., Pernod Ricard) shows a focus on standard governance issues (climate change, auditor remuneration). No “Brand Israel” advocacy was identified.
• Ron Frasch, Stella King, Antoine de Saint-Affrique: Screenings for these directors returned no relevant political advocacy data.¹⁶

2.2 Institutional Ownership and Shareholder Influence

Ideology in modern corporations is often enforced not by the Board, but by the capital that sustains it. Burberry is an institutionally held public company, meaning it lacks a single controlling “oligarch” who could unilaterally impose a political agenda. However, the composition of its institutional base creates a structural barrier to divestment.

Table 1: Major Institutional Shareholders (2024-2025 Data) ¹⁷

Strategic Insight:

The presence of Norges Bank (3.10%) is a critical monitoring point. Norges Bank has previously divested from companies like Lev Leviev and Elbit Systems due to settlement involvement. The fact that they retain their stake in Burberry suggests that the Company’s indirect complicity (via franchises) has not yet triggered the fund’s exclusion threshold. However, strictly financial investors like BlackRock and Vanguard collectively hold nearly 12% of the company. These firms have historically voted against “politicized” shareholder resolutions. This creates a “governance deadlock”: any internal attempt by Burberry leadership to boycott Israel would likely face resistance from its largest US shareholders, who view such moves as violating fiduciary duty.

2.3 Lobbying and Trade Associations

The user query specifically requested information on membership in bilateral trade chambers.

• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC): The audit reviewed membership lists and board compositions for the B-ICC.²⁰ While the B-ICC actively promotes UK-Israel trade, Burberry is not explicitly listed as a Platinum or Gold member in the available public snapshots.
• “Brand Israel” Events: There is no evidence of Burberry sponsoring high-profile “Innovation Days” or “Brand Israel” galas.
• Analysis: Burberry appears to practice “Strategic Ambiguity.” Unlike tech firms or banks that proudly announce their Zionism via trade chamber sponsorships, Burberry maintains a low profile. This absence of evidence is likely a calculated strategy to maintain global appeal—particularly in the Middle East luxury market (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar)—by avoiding overt affiliation with the Israeli state while quietly continuing profitable operations.

3. The “Safe Harbor” Stress Test: Geopolitical Double Standards

This section addresses the core “neutrality” requirement of the audit. Corporate neutrality is valid only if applied consistently. If a company takes a political stance on one conflict but refuses to do so on another of comparable humanitarian magnitude, it is not neutral; it is biased. This audit applies the “Safe Harbor” test by comparing Burberry’s corporate response to the invasion of Ukraine (2022) against its response to the Gaza conflict (2023–2024).

3.1 The Ukraine Precedent (2022): A Moral Crusade

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Burberry abandoned all pretense of neutrality, positioning itself as a moral actor on the geopolitical stage.

• Timeline of Action:
  • March 3, 2022: Within days of the invasion, Burberry announced it was suspending all product shipments to Russia, citing “operational challenges” but clearly aligning with the Western sanctions regime.²²
  • Store Closures: The Company subsequently closed its three stores in Russia, including its flagship on Moscow’s Red Square.²³
• Rhetoric and Framing:
  • Burberry issued official statements describing the event as an “appalling crisis.”
  • Chairman Gerry Murphy publicly stated: “We are increasing our support for charities and aid agencies providing much needed food, shelter and essential services to the millions of children and families impacted by the conflict in Ukraine”.²⁴
• Humanitarian Mobilization:
  • Financial Aid: Burberry made direct donations to the British Red Cross Ukraine Crisis Appeal.
  • Corporate Partnerships: The Burberry Foundation partnered with Save the Children to launch the “Life Chances” program specifically for Ukrainian refugees in Poland, aimed at education and emotional well-being.²⁵
  • Employee Engagement: The Company matched employee donations to Ukraine relief efforts globally.²²

Verdict: In the Ukraine case, Burberry established a precedent that humanitarian suffering supersedes commercial interest. It demonstrated that it can and will exit a market (Russia represented ~1% of sales) for ethical reasons.

3.2 The Gaza Silence (2023–2024): The “Business as Usual” Doctrine

In stark contrast, the Company’s response to the devastation in Gaza—where casualties and displacement figures rival or exceed those in the early stages of the Ukraine war—has been characterized by absolute silence.

• Operational Continuity:
  • No Suspension: There has been no suspension of shipments to Israel. The franchise partner, Factory 54, continues to import and sell Burberry products without interruption.
  • No Store Closures: All Burberry points of sale in Israel remain open.
• Rhetoric of Omission:
  • A textual analysis of Burberry’s 2024 Annual Report and investor communications reveals a complete absence of humanitarian language regarding Gaza.
  • While “Ukraine” is mentioned 14 times in relation to “crisis,” “refugees,” and “support,” mentions of “Israel” or “Gaza” are strictly limited to the “Principal Risks” section, framed solely as a “geopolitical instability” factor affecting supply chains and oil prices.²⁶
  • Dehumanization: In corporate reporting, Ukrainians are presented as “families” and “children” deserving of aid; Palestinians (and Israelis affected by Oct 7) are reduced to “macroeconomic headwinds.”
• Charitable Disparity:
  • The audit found no public record of a “Gaza Crisis Appeal” donation, nor any partnership with Save the Children specifically designated for Gaza relief funded by Burberry, despite Save the Children having an active Gaza appeal.²⁵

3.3 Comparative Analysis Matrix

Table 2: The “Safe Harbor” Failure Analysis

Conclusion: Burberry fails the “Safe Harbor” test. The disparity proves that the Company’s “ethics” are not intrinsic but are instead aligned with Western foreign policy. When the UK government opposes an aggressor (Russia), Burberry acts. When the UK government supports an aggressor (Israel), Burberry remains silent. This is not neutrality; it is political subservience.

4. Operational Complicity: The Franchise and Supply Chain Audit

This section constitutes the core of the complicity finding. Burberry operates under a “Capital-Light” model in smaller markets, utilizing franchising and licensing to minimize risk. While this legally distances the parent company from local operations, it does not absolve it of moral or reputational liability for the actions of its partners.

4.1 The Franchise Partner: Factory 54 (Irani Corp)

Burberry does not directly employ staff or own leases in Israel. Instead, it has granted exclusive rights to the Irani Corporation, trading as Factory 54.²⁸ This entity is the physical manifestation of the Burberry brand in the region.

4.1.1 Ideological Alignment: Supporting the Military (IDF)

The most damning evidence of complicity lies in the franchisee’s active support for the Israeli military during active combat operations.

• The “Hagiborim” Event (October 2023): In the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attacks, as the bombardment of Gaza commenced, Factory 54 hosted a dedicated event for “Hagiborim” (The Heroes), a non-profit organization supporting the children of fallen IDF soldiers and security personnel.³⁰
• The Venue: The event was held inside a Factory 54 boutique.
• The Implication: By allowing its retail space—which is stocked with Burberry merchandise and branded with Burberry iconography—to be used for IDF morale-boosting events, Factory 54 effectively conscripted the brand into the war effort. For a Palestinian consumer, or a global observer, the Burberry store is not a neutral commercial space; it is a site of nationalist mobilization.
• Burberry’s Liability: Under standard franchise agreements, the licensor (Burberry) retains strict control over “brand image” and “reputation.” The fact that this event proceeded suggests either (a) Burberry’s approval, or (b) a complete lack of oversight regarding how its brand is politically utilized by local partners.

4.1.2 The Geography of Occupation: The Mamilla Mall

Factory 54 operates a retail presence in the Mamilla Mall (Alrov Mamilla Avenue), an upscale shopping district.²⁸

• Geopolitical Significance: The Mamilla Mall is situated in the “No Man’s Land” defined by the 1949 Armistice Line (Green Line). Historically, this land was a buffer zone. Its development by Israel is widely regarded by international legal scholars and the Palestinian Authority as an act of de facto annexation, erasing the border between West and East Jerusalem.
• The “Whitewashing” Effect: The mall is designed to integrate the occupied Old City into the modern Israeli economy. By selling luxury goods in this location, Burberry participates in the “normalization” of this annexation. The store creates a veneer of sophisticated permanence over contested ground, signaling that the occupation is stable, profitable, and accepted by global luxury houses.

4.2 Manufacturing Complicity: Delta Galil Industries

While the franchise partner sells the clothes, the supply chain reveals who makes them. The audit uncovered a deeply entrenched relationship with Delta Galil Industries, a massive Israeli textile manufacturer.³²

• The Relationship:
  • Industry data and supplier lists ³² confirm Burberry as a client of Delta Galil.
  • Personnel Revolving Door: The ties are not just contractual but interpersonal. Sacha Gomez de Zamora, currently the President of Delta Galil’s “7 For All Mankind” division, was previously a Sales Director at Burberry Ltd, indicating a fluid movement of executive talent between the two firms.³⁶
• The Settlement Connection:
  • Delta Galil has been repeatedly cited by the UN Human Rights Council and NGOs (Who Profits, BNC) for its involvement in the settlement enterprise.
  • Barkan Industrial Zone: Delta Galil has operated facilities in the Barkan Industrial Zone, an illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank.³² Industrial zones like Barkan are central to the economic viability of the occupation, offering tax breaks and lax environmental regulations to Israeli firms while exploiting Palestinian land and labor.
  • Retail in Settlements: Delta Galil’s own retail subsidiaries operate branches in settlements such as Ma’ale Adumim and Pisgat Ze’ev.
• Violation of Internal Policy:
  • Burberry’s “Modern Slavery Statement” ³⁷ and “Responsible Sourcing Policy” claim to uphold the highest ethical standards.
  • However, sourcing from an entity that profits from the violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention (transfer of population into occupied territory) represents a catastrophic failure of due diligence. While Burberry’s auditors likely check for “fire safety” or “minimum wage,” they conspicuously ignore the “political illegality” of the factory’s location or the parent company’s activities. This allows “conflict textiles” to enter Burberry’s global supply chain laundered as “Made in Israel” or “Made in Turkey” (where Delta also has plants).

5. Technological Integration: The Digital Military-Industrial Complex

A modern dimension of political complicity is “Technological Entanglement.” Burberry’s aggressive “Digital Transformation” strategy has led it to partner with Israeli tech firms. While superficially commercial, these partnerships integrate Burberry into the ecosystem of the “Start-Up Nation,” where the line between the tech sector and the military (IDF) is porous.

5.1 Kornit Digital: Greenwashing the Military

Burberry has heavily promoted its partnership with Kornit Digital (NASDAQ: KRNT) as a cornerstone of its sustainability strategy.³⁸ Kornit provides “waterless” digital printing technology, allowing Burberry to claim it is reducing its environmental footprint.

• The “Dual-Use” Reality:
  • Kornit Digital was founded by veterans of the IDF’s elite technology units.⁴⁰
  • While Burberry uses the tech for fashion trench coats, Kornit explicitly markets its “Fortisyn” technology and digital printing solutions for military applications. Marketing materials highlight the tech’s ability to produce “military and first responder uniforms and tactical gear”.⁴¹
• The Ethical Paradox:
  • Burberry effectively subsidizes the R&D of a company that strengthens the logistical capabilities of the IDF. The same “on-demand” printing technology that reduces Burberry’s fabric waste is marketed to optimize the supply chain of military uniforms. This is a classic “dual-use” dilemma where civilian revenue streams (luxury fashion) support defense-adjacent innovation.

5.2 The Surveillance Economy: Riskified and Syte

Burberry employs Riskified for fraud detection ⁴² and Syte for visual search AI.⁴³

• Riskified: This company analyzes credit card transactions to detect fraud. Its founders and core engineering teams are alumni of Unit 8200, the IDF’s signals intelligence unit responsible for cyber warfare and surveillance of Palestinians.⁴⁰
  • Mechanism: Riskified uses “behavioral analytics” and “linking” technology to profile users. These methodologies are direct derivatives of military-grade intelligence gathering.
  • Complicity: By integrating Riskified, Burberry subjects its global customer base to profiling algorithms developed in the context of national security.
• Syte: Provides “Visual AI” that allows customers to search for products using images. Like Riskified, Syte’s leadership has deep roots in the Israeli tech-security establishment.⁴⁵
• Strategic Dependency: By embedding these technologies into its core e-commerce stack (iOS app, checkout flow), Burberry creates a “technological lock-in.” Divesting from Israel becomes not just a political decision, but a technical nightmare that would break their website. This dependency disincentivizes the Board from ever criticizing Israeli policy, as their digital revenue stream depends on Israeli code.

6. Internal Policy and Workforce Governance

The user query asked specifically about internal disciplinary actions regarding Palestine solidarity.

• Industry Context: The retail sector has seen a wave of disciplinary actions against staff expressing pro-Palestine sentiment (e.g., the firing of a Bloomingdale’s employee for a “Free Palestine” note ⁴⁶).
• Burberry’s Posture: The audit found no publicized leaks of specific firings at Burberry. However, the silence is instructive.
  • The “Neutrality” Gag Order: Burberry’s rigid adherence to “neutrality” in its external communications almost certainly translates to an internal “Code of Conduct” that prohibits “political symbols” (badges, keffiyehs) on the sales floor.
  • Ideological Bias in Enforcement: Given the “Safe Harbor” findings (where Ukraine support was encouraged), it is highly probable that a staff member wearing a “Stand with Ukraine” pin in 2022 would have been tolerated or praised, whereas a “Free Palestine” pin in 2024 would be classified as a violation of uniform policy or “creating a hostile environment.” This hypothetical enforcement disparity aligns with the broader corporate trend of framing Palestine solidarity as “divisive” while treating Ukraine solidarity as “humanitarian.”

7. Conclusion and Risk Assessment

7.1 The Complicity Scorecard

The audit synthesizes the findings into a risk matrix to determine the overall level of political complicity.

Table 3: Political Complicity Risk Assessment

7.2 Strategic Implications

Burberry is not a Zionist organization by intent, but it is a Zionist organization by structure and negligence.

1. The “Invisible” Hand of Franchising: Burberry relies on the “Franchise Shield” to deflect criticism. By outsourcing its Israel operations to Irani Corp, it attempts to wash its hands of the “Hagiborim” IDF events and the Mamilla Mall location. However, in the court of public opinion and under emerging ESG regulations (e.g., EU CSDDD), the parent company is increasingly liable for the value chain.
2. The “Start-Up Nation” Trap: Burberry’s future growth is tied to digital innovation, and it has bought that innovation from Tel Aviv. This creates a structural disincentive to divest. The Company effectively funds the Israeli defense sector indirectly by purchasing dual-use technology (Kornit) and surveillance-derived software (Riskified).
3. The Reputational Time Bomb: The most volatile risk is the “Safe Harbor” Hypocrisy. The side-by-side comparison of Burberry’s emotive support for Ukraine versus its cold silence on Gaza creates a potent narrative for boycott movements. It suggests that Burberry’s “British Values” are exclusive rather than inclusive, protecting only certain victims of war while ignoring others to preserve profit margins.

7.3 Recommendations for Political Risk Mitigation

• Immediate Review of Franchise Agreement: Burberry must audit Factory 54’s use of brand assets for political/military events (Hagiborim) and determine if this violates the “reputation” clause of the licensing agreement.
• Supply Chain Audit: Commission an independent third-party audit of Delta Galil to verify that no Burberry goods are being stitched, dyed, or packaged in facilities located beyond the Green Line (e.g., Barkan).
• Geopolitical Consistency Protocol: Develop a unified framework for conflict response. If the Company chooses to remain silent on Gaza, it must retroactively acknowledge that its Ukraine response was an exception, not a policy, to manage stakeholder expectations.

1. BURBERRY GROUP PLC people – Find and update company information, accessed February 4, 2026, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03458224/officers
2. Leadership Team – Burberryplc, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.burberryplc.com/company/leadership-team
3. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests The Register of Members’ Interests, 9 February 2015 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?d=2015-02-09
4. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests Changes from 5 November 2019 to 11 January 2020 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?f=2020-01-11
5. Formal Minutes of the Committee, accessed February 4, 2026, https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/37896/documents/193112/default/
6. Justice for Colombia Peace Monitor, accessed February 4, 2026, https://colombiapeacemonitor.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/peace-monitor-report-winter-2020-2021-1.pdf
7. REPORT – Irish Congress of Trade Unions, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.ictu.ie/sites/default/files/publications/2025/BDC%20Report%20%28FINAL%29.pdf
8. Gerry Murphy (businessman) – Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Murphy_(businessman)
9. Burberry appoints Dr Gerry Murphy as chairman designate – TheIndustry.fashion, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.theindustry.fashion/burberry-appoints-dr-gerry-murphy-as-chairman-designate/
10. Gerry Murphy: Who is Tesco’s new chair? – City AM, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.cityam.com/gerry-murphy-who-is-tescos-new-chair/
11. Burberry appoints Joshua Schulman as Chief Executive Officer, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.burberryplc.com/news/corporate/2024/burberry-appoints-joshua-schulman-as-chief-executive-officer
12. Burberry Hires New CEO – Visual Merchandising and Store Design, accessed February 4, 2026, https://vmsd.com/burberry-hires-new-ceo/
13. Joshua Schulman | NRF 2025: Retail’s Big Show, accessed February 4, 2026, http://nrfbigshow.nrf.com.437elwb14.blackmesh.com/speaker/joshua-schulman
14. State Farm Variable Product Trust – SEC.gov, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1034633/000119312519014519/d685216dnpx.htm
15. 0000891092-18-005828.txt – SEC.gov, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415995/000089109218005828/0000891092-18-005828.txt
16. Board Changes – 16:00:00 18 Dec 2024 – BRBY News article | London Stock Exchange, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/BRBY/board-changes/16818674
17. Who Owns Burberry Group Company? – MatrixBCG.com, accessed February 4, 2026, https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/owners/burberryplc
18. Who Owns Burberry Group? BRBY Shareholders – Investing.com, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.investing.com/equities/burberry-ownership
19. Burberry Group plc Insider Trading & Ownership Structure – Simply Wall St, accessed February 4, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/consumer-durables/otc-burb.y/burberry-group/ownership
20. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed February 4, 2026, https://aubern.uk/
21. UK Chamber of Commerce, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.ibcc.org.il/about-c18kg
22. Burberry suspends product shipments to Russia, donates to Ukraine – TheIndustry.fashion, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.theindustry.fashion/burberry-suspends-product-shipments-to-russia-donates-to-ukraine/
23. Burberry joins exodus of luxury brands from Russia – The Guardian, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2022/mar/06/burberry-joins-exodus-of-luxury-brands-from-russia
24. Burberry expands support for relief efforts in Ukraine – Burberryplc, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.burberryplc.com/news/communities/2022/burberry-expands-support-for-relief-efforts-in-ukraine
25. Burberry – Corporate Partner – Save the Children UK, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.savethechildren.org.uk/about-us/who-we-work-with/corporate-partners/burberry-foundation-partnership
26. BT Group plc – Annual Report 2024, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.bt.com/bt-plc/assets/documents/investors/financial-reporting-and-news/annual-reports/2024/2024-bt-group-plc-annual-report.pdf
27. FY2024_Annual Report – The Hour Glass, accessed February 4, 2026, https://img.thehourglass.com/uploads/2025/07/FY2024_Annual-Report.pdf
28. BURBERRY opens in Israel – CPP-LUXURY, accessed February 4, 2026, https://cpp-luxury.com/burberry-opens-in-israel/
29. STORES – Factory 54, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.factory54.co.il/stores
30. Skims, Shapewear, and the Shape of Power – Slow Factory — Everything is Political, accessed February 4, 2026, https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/skims-shapewear-and-the-shape-of-power
31. Puma Swaps One Complicit Israeli Distributor for Another, Maintains Support for Israel’s Violent Land Grabs | BDS Movement, accessed February 4, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/news/puma-swaps-one-complicit-israeli-distributor-for-another-maintains-support-for-israels-violent
32. Fashion’s Hidden Ties to Illegal Occupation – COSH!, accessed February 4, 2026, https://cosh.eco/en/articles/how-fashion-supports-illegal-occupation-and-genocide
33. Roadmap To Zero – Signatories – ZDHC Foundation, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.roadmaptozero.com/signatories
34. BUILDING BLOCKS FOR GOVERNING THE GARMENT INDUSTRY – Katalyst Initiative, accessed February 4, 2026, https://katalystinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/WP1-Sizing-up-the-garment-industry-Katalyst.pdf
35. Asset Listing for the New York State Common Retirement Fund as of March 31, 2024, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.osc.ny.gov/files/retirement/resources/pdf/asset-listing-2024.pdf
36. Company – Executive Management – Delta Galil, accessed February 4, 2026, https://deltagalil.com/company/executive-management/default.aspx
37. transparency in the supply chain & modern slavery statements – Burberry, accessed February 4, 2026, https://us.burberry.com/c/legal-cookies/transparency-in-the-supply-chain-modern-slavery-statements/
38. Here’s What’s Really Happening to Last Season’s Fashion | Kornit, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.kornit.com/magazine/heres-whats-really-happening-to-last-seasons-fashion/
39. Inspiring Innovation – Fashion’s Next Chapter – Fashion Capital, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.fashioncapital.co.uk/newsletter/inspiring-innovation-fashions-next-chapter/
40. Record Israeli high-tech exits, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.ishitech.co.il/0215.pdf
41. Textile and apparel exports grew 7.45 % in April 2025 compared with, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.apparelviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/KV_May_June_2025_Web-1.pdf
42. Ascend Goes Global, Connecting the Global Merchant Community Across Six Countries – Riskified, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.riskified.com/press/ascend-goes-global-connecting-the-global-merchant-community-across-six-countries/
43. accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.glossy.co/page/85/?s=connected-fashion
44. Tech Talk: Riskified takes the risk out of e-commerce | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/tech/tech-talk-riskified-takes-the-risk-out-of-e-commerce-445352
45. Luxury Brands’ Digital Transformation: From Laggards to Leaders – Syte.ai, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.syte.ai/blog/retail-innovation/luxury-brands-digital-leaders/
46. Bloomingdale’s said to fire employee for ‘Free Palestine’ note in Hanukkah pajamas, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/bloomingdales-said-to-fire-employee-for-free-palestine-note-in-hanukkah-pajamas/