Hublot Political Audit

Executive Summary

This comprehensive governance audit evaluates the political and ideological footprint of Hublot SA, a premier subsidiary of the LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton conglomerate, to determine its level of “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the associated systems of control. In an era where corporate neutrality is increasingly scrutinized, and where the boundary between commercial operation and political endorsement is porous, this report seeks to establish a definitive risk rating for Hublot based on four core intelligence requirements: Governance Ideology, Lobbying & Trade, the ‘Safe Harbor’ comparative crisis response test, and Internal Human Resources Policy.

The findings detailed in this dossier indicate that Hublot SA, and its parent entity LVMH, have moved beyond passive commercial engagement to active ideological and economic integration with the Israeli state apparatus. Unlike many multinational corporations that maintain a presence in the region solely for retail revenue, Hublot has engaged in the “ideological manufacturing” of nationalist symbols—specifically through the production of limited-edition timepieces that explicitly celebrate Israeli sovereignty and settler-nationalist slogans. Furthermore, the parent company’s capital allocation strategy reveals a deep entanglement with Israel’s strategic sectors, including cybersecurity and diamond production, often under the guise of “innovation” or “sustainability” (greenwashing), while simultaneously ignoring the geopolitical implications of these investments.

A critical component of this audit is the application of the “Safe Harbor” test, which reveals a stark and verifiable double standard in the corporate response to global conflict. The audit documents a robust, high-visibility humanitarian and operational response to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, contrasted against a posture of silence, neutrality, and internal suppression regarding the devastation in Gaza from October 2023 onwards. This disparity suggests that the organization’s humanitarian framework is not universal but is instead aligned with specific Western geopolitical interests, rendering the brand complicit in the normalization of the status quo in Palestine.

The report concludes that Hublot’s operations—ranging from the sale of goods in the disputed Mamilla Mall to the capitalization of Israeli military-adjacent tech firms—constitute a high-risk profile. The brand effectively lends its luxury prestige to the “Brand Israel” initiative, washing over reputational risks associated with the occupation while punishing internal dissent regarding Palestinian rights.

2. Methodology and Risk Framework

2.1 Defining Political Complicity in the Luxury Sector

In the context of this audit, “Political Complicity” is defined not merely by the violation of sanctions (which may not exist in a given jurisdiction) but by the active reinforcement of systems that contravene international human rights law. For a luxury brand like Hublot, complicity operates on three distinct levels:

1. Symbolic Complicity: The use of brand equity to legitimize political narratives (e.g., commemorative products).
2. Economic Complicity: Direct investment in or trade with entities that sustain the occupation or the military-industrial complex.
3. Institutional Complicity: Participation in lobbying groups or trade chambers that advocate for the normalization of settlement goods or the suppression of boycott movements.

2.2 The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test Standard

The ‘Safe Harbor’ test is an analytical mechanism used to determine if a corporation applies a consistent ethical standard across different jurisdictions. By comparing the corporate reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (a “Safe Harbor” moral stance in the West) against the reaction to the bombardment of Gaza, analysts can isolate geopolitical bias. A ​passing grade requires consistent application of humanitarian aid, public condemnation of violence, and support for affected employees. A significant deviation indicates that the company’s “ethics” are actually “politics.”

3. Governance Ideology: The LVMH-Israel Strategic Nexus

To understand the political footprint of Hublot, one must first analyze the capital flows and strategic priorities of its parent company, LVMH, controlled by the Arnault family. The strategic direction of Hublot is inextricably linked to the broader geopolitical maneuverings of the conglomerate. While the Arnault family has clarified they are not Jewish in response to unrelated fundraising queries ¹, the audit reveals that the conglomerate operates on a potent axis of “Economic Zionism,” viewing the Israeli economy not just as a market, but as a strategic partner in the future of luxury technology and resource extraction.

3.1 Capital Injection into the “Startup Nation” Narrative

The LVMH group has actively utilized its venture capital arms—Aglaé Ventures (the Arnault family office) and LVMH Luxury Ventures—to inject capital into the Israeli technology sector. This is a critical finding because the Israeli high-tech sector is deeply integrated with the state’s military and intelligence apparatus, often referred to as the “Silicon Wadi.” Investments here are not politically neutral; they support the economic resilience of the state and the retention of human capital within the military-industrial ecosystem.

3.1.1 The Wiz Investment and Military-Civil Fusion

A primary vector of complicity is the direct investment by Bernard Arnault’s Aglaé Ventures in Wiz, an Israeli cybersecurity unicorn. Wiz was founded by the team that previously led Microsoft Azure’s Cloud Security Group, a cohort of veterans from Unit 8200, the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) elite signals intelligence unit.²

This investment is significant for several reasons. First, cybersecurity is a “dual-use” technology. The skills and platforms developed for enterprise security are often birthed from offensive cyber capabilities developed during military service. By funding firms like Wiz, Arnault is effectively subsidizing the post-service economy of Unit 8200 veterans, making the “military-to-tech” pipeline lucrative and sustainable. This strengthens the prestige and economic viability of service in intelligence units that are instrumental in the surveillance and control of the Palestinian population.

Second, the investment serves a legitimizing function. When the world’s richest man ² invests in an Israeli firm during a period of geopolitical instability, it sends a signal to the global market that Israel remains a safe and desirable destination for capital. This directly counters the efforts of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to pressure the state economically to comply with international law.

3.2 LVMH Luxury Ventures and the “Greenwashing” of Conflict Resources

Perhaps the most direct link between LVMH’s supply chain and the Israeli economy is the strategic investment in Lusix, a Rehovot-based producer of lab-grown diamonds (LGD). LVMH Luxury Ventures led a $90 million investment round in Lusix.³

3.2.1 The Lusix Case: Sustainability as a Shield

Lusix markets its product as “Sun Grown Diamonds,” emphasizing that its production facility is powered by a dedicated solar farm.⁵ This branding aligns with LVMH’s “Life 360” sustainability goals. However, from a political risk perspective, this represents a textbook case of “Greenwashing the Occupation.”

By focusing entirely on the environmental impact (solar power), LVMH obscures the social and political impact of the investment.

• Economic Support: The $90 million investment was explicitly designated for expanding production capacity within Israel.⁴ This creates industrial jobs, tax revenue, and infrastructure development for the Israeli state.
• Supply Chain Integration: These diamonds are not just financial assets; they are integrated into LVMH products. The audit confirms that TAG Heuer (a sister brand to Hublot within the LVMH Watches & Jewelry division) utilized Lusix diamonds for its cutting-edge “Carrera Plasma” model.⁷ While Hublot has not issued a press release explicitly naming Lusix for a specific model, the shared supply chain architecture of the LVMH watch division suggests a high probability of cross-utilization.
• The “Conflict-Free” Fallacy: LVMH relies on the Kimberley Process to certify its diamonds as ethical.⁹ However, the Kimberley Process has been widely criticized by human rights organizations for its narrow definition of “conflict diamonds,” which only includes gemstones used by rebel groups to fight legitimate governments. It essentially gives a “free pass” to diamonds produced by state actors, even if those states are engaged in illegal occupation or alleged genocide. By investing in Lusix, LVMH is betting on a future where “lab-grown in Israel” is marketed as the ethical alternative to mined diamonds, cynically ignoring the political context of the manufacturing location.

3.3 Governance Complicity Score

The governance ideology of Hublot and LVMH is rated as High Risk. The leadership does not merely tolerate the existence of Israel; it actively bets on its economic future. The investments in Wiz and Lusix demonstrate a strategic alignment that prioritizes technological and resource integration with the Israeli state over Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) regarding the occupation.

4. Hublot’s “Titanium Blue” Doctrine: Ideological Manufacturing

While LVMH provides the financial umbrella, Hublot as a specific brand has engaged in overt, product-based ideological support for the State of Israel. This distinguishes it from other luxury brands that may simply have retail operations in the country. Hublot has actively manufactured products that serve as nationalist symbols, effectively weaponizing the “Art of Fusion” to fuse luxury watchmaking with Zionist political identity.

4.1 The 70th Anniversary “Titanium Blue” Special Edition

In 2018, to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel—an event that Palestinians mourn as the Nakba (Catastrophe), marking the expulsion of 700,000 Palestinians—Hublot released the “Classic Fusion Titanium Blue Israel” (Ref. 511.NX.7170.LR.ISL18).¹⁰

This timepiece serves as irrefutable evidence of political complicity. It is not a generic “regional edition” (like a red watch for the Chinese New Year); it is a political manifesto worn on the wrist.

4.1.1 Deconstructing the Symbolism

The design choices for this watch were deliberate and explicitly nationalist:

• The Dial: The watch features a Star of David applied directly to the dial at the 12 o’clock position.¹¹ The color scheme (satin-finished blue) is explicitly cited in marketing materials as “the blue of the flag of Israel”.¹¹
• The Engraving: The case back is engraved with the slogan “Am Yisrael Chai” (The People of Israel Live) in Hebrew, alongside the dates “1948-2018”.¹¹
  • Political Implication: The phrase “Am Yisrael Chai” is not merely a religious statement; it is a nationalist rallying cry. In recent years, it has been adopted by right-wing settler movements to assert Jewish supremacy over the land and to dismiss Palestinian claims to sovereignty. By engraving this slogan on a luxury product, Hublot is physically inscribing a Zionist political narrative onto its merchandise.
  • Historical Erasure: The celebration of “1948” without any acknowledgment of the displacement that occurred simultaneously constitutes a political stance that validates the Israeli narrative while erasing the Palestinian experience.
• Exclusivity: The production was strictly limited to 70 pieces, creating a “club” of wealthy Zionist supporters.¹⁰ This scarcity drives demand among the ultra-wealthy donor class who frequent events like the FIDF galas, turning the watch into a shibboleth of political allegiance.

4.2 Executive Endorsement: The Role of Ricardo Guadalupe

The release of the “Titanium Blue” was not a rogue action by a local distributor; it had the full endorsement of Hublot HQ in Nyon, Switzerland. The audit highlights the personal involvement of Ricardo Guadalupe, CEO of Hublot.

In an interview regarding the watch (part of the “Dream in the Sand” project), Guadalupe’s rhetoric revealed a clear understanding of the political weight of the project. He stated, “It’s our pride and is done in honor of the great event in our history”.¹⁰ When the interviewer asked if he understood that “not everyone would like your project” (an allusion to the Palestinian conflict), Guadalupe admitted, “Of course! Our whole team understood this… It’s a pure niche project”.¹⁰

This admission is critical for the audit. It proves intent. The executive leadership knowingly engaged in a project they realized would be controversial or offensive to Palestinians and their supporters, yet proceeded to prioritize the “pride” of the Israeli market. This moves the infraction from “negligence” to “calculated political complicity.” Guadalupe also actively participates in ribbon-cutting ceremonies for boutiques in the region, reinforcing the brand’s physical commitment to the market.¹²

4.3 The “King Power” and Other Editions

Hublot’s strategy of hyper-segmentation extends beyond the 70th Anniversary watch. The brand has produced other limited editions that circulate within the Israeli market, such as the “King Power F1 Interlagos”.¹³ While the F1 watch is global, the specific allocation of inventory to the Israeli market (often customized or marketed via local partners like Padani) indicates a strategy to cultivate the Israeli elite. The brand has identified the Israeli nationalist segment as a lucrative vertical, willing to overlook the reputational risk associated with alienating pro-Palestinian consumers globally.

5. Retail Geopolitics: The Mamilla Mall and Annexation Normalization

The physical location of a brand’s retail operations acts as a ground-truth indicator of its adherence to international law regarding occupied territories. Hublot’s presence in the Mamilla Mall in Jerusalem represents a significant compliance failure regarding the “Green Line” and the status of East Jerusalem.

5.1 The Architecture of Erasure: Mamilla Mall

Mamilla Mall (Alrov Mamilla Avenue) is an upscale open-air shopping district located on the “seam line” between West and East Jerusalem. Historically, this area was a buffer zone (No Man’s Land) between 1948 and 1967. The construction of the mall was a highly political urban planning project designed to bridge the gap between the two sides of the city, effectively erasing the Green Line and integrating the Old City (Occupied East Jerusalem) into the commercial fabric of West Jerusalem.¹⁴

• Normalization of Annexation: By operating in this specific location, brands normalize the Israeli claim that Jerusalem is the “united, undivided capital” of Israel—a claim not recognized by the United Nations or the majority of the international community, which views East Jerusalem as occupied territory.
• Hublot’s Presence: Hublot watches are sold prominently within Mamilla Mall through their retail partners. The audit identifies the Rolex Boutique Euro-Asia and Padani Jewellers within the mall as key points of sale.¹⁴
• Neighborhood of Complicity: Hublot is not alone; it sits alongside other LVMH brands like Dior, as well as competitors like Rolex and H. Stern.¹⁶ This clustering creates a “sanitized” zone where the reality of the occupation—often just meters away at the Jaffa Gate checkpoints—is obscured by luxury consumption.

5.2 The Strategic Partner: Padani Jewellers

Hublot does not operate standalone corporate-owned boutiques in Israel (a common “Safe Harbor” tactic to avoid direct liability). Instead, it operates through a highly integrated partnership with Padani Jewellers.¹⁹

• The Conduit: Padani is the official distributor for Hublot in Israel, holding the keys to the market alongside brands like Patek Philippe, Cartier, and Breitling.²⁰
• Exclusive Distribution: The “Titanium Blue” 70th Anniversary watch was likely distributed exclusively through Padani’s network, as Padani is the primary interface for high-net-worth Israeli clients.¹¹
• Operations: Padani operates branches in Tel Aviv and the controversial Jerusalem (Mamilla) location.²¹
• Audit Finding: The reliance on a local partner does not absolve Hublot of responsibility. On the contrary, it demonstrates a strategy where the brand outsources its complicity to a local entity while reaping the profits. By granting Padani the license to sell and market these goods, Hublot empowers a company that operates directly on the seam line of the occupation.

6. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test: Comparative Crisis Response

A critical component of this political risk audit is the “Safe Harbor” test. This diagnostic tool evaluates whether a corporation applies consistent ethical standards and humanitarian responses across different geopolitical conflicts. The comparison between Hublot/LVMH’s response to the invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the destruction of Gaza (2023-2024) reveals a discriminatory policy framework that aligns with Western foreign policy rather than universal human rights.

6.1 Response to Ukraine (2022): The Corporate Citizen

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, LVMH and its brands mobilized rapidly to align with Western sanctions and public sentiment. The response was characterized by speed, visibility, and financial magnitude.

• Financial Aid: LVMH pledged €5 million ($5.5 million) to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to aid victims of the war immediately after the conflict escalated.²³
• Operational Cessation: The group moved swiftly to close 124 stores in Russia, suspending operations despite the significant financial loss from the Russian luxury market.²⁶
• Symbolic Solidarity: The corporate machinery amplified acts of solidarity. Employees were photographed boarding up Louis Vuitton windows in Kyiv to protect them, and the brand issued statements standing with “everyone severely affected by the war”.²³
• Refugee Support: The tone of the response was one of unequivocal support for the victims of aggression, with funds directed specifically toward women and children refugees.

6.2 Response to Gaza (2023-2024): The Silent Partner

In contrast, the response to the events of October 7th and the subsequent bombardment of Gaza—resulting in a death toll far exceeding 30,000—has been markedly different. The audit characterizes this response as “Strategic Silence.”

• Corporate Silence: There is no record of a comparable corporate donation to Palestinian relief organizations (e.g., UNRWA, PCRF, Doctors Without Borders in Gaza) from LVMH or Hublot in the provided intelligence.⁹ The €5 million benchmark set for Ukraine was not met for Gaza.
• Selective Condemnation: While the LVMH group owns brands like Louis Vuitton that faced controversy over a t-shirt featuring a watermelon (a symbol of Palestinian resistance), the corporate entity vehemently denied any political intent, framing it as a coincidence rather than solidarity.²⁷ This contrasts with the explicit political solidarity shown for Ukraine.
• Humanitarian Hierarchy: The disparity in aid suggests that Palestinian victims do not hold the same “reputational value” in the corporate calculus as Ukrainian victims. In the luxury sector, aligning with Ukraine was seen as brand-safe and obligatory; aligning with Gaza is seen as brand-toxic.
• Indirect Support for the Aggressor: While LVMH has not publicized direct donations to the IDF, the ecosystem in which it operates is heavily skewed. Competitors and industry peers (like Estée Lauder executives) have donated to the Jewish National Fund and Magen David Adom.²⁹ The pressure within the industry is to support Israeli relief efforts, while support for Gaza is policed.

6.3 Data Visualization: The Disparity Matrix

The following table summarizes the verifiable divergence in corporate crisis response:

7. Internal Policy and Human Resources: The Policing of Dissent

The treatment of employees regarding political speech serves as a litmus test for corporate ideological bias. The audit finds evidence that LVMH maintains a hostile environment for expressions of Palestinian solidarity, while tolerating or celebrating Zionist expression as “heritage.”

7.1 The Bella Hadid Case Study (LVMH/Dior)

While not a Hublot-specific employee, Bella Hadid serves as the highest-profile case study of LVMH’s internal policy regarding Palestine. Hadid, a supermodel of Palestinian descent, has been a vocal advocate for Palestinian rights and a critic of Israeli policies.

• The Action: Reports and industry analysis indicate that LVMH (specifically the Dior brand, a sister house to Hublot) replaced Hadid with Israeli model May Tager in advertising campaigns following her outspoken support for Gaza.³²
• The Explanation: An LVMH employee reportedly stated, “LVMH’s stance on politics is neutral, but they are not cancelling Bella’s contract”.³²
• The Analysis: This use of “neutrality” is weaponized. The de facto removal of Hadid from prominent campaigns contradicts the claim of neutrality. It signals to all staff that supporting Palestine is a “career-limiting move.” Meanwhile, the employment of May Tager (who has publicly supported the IDF) acts as a political signal of alignment with Israel.
• The Hublot Contrast: Compare the treatment of Hadid (sidelined for political speech) with the behavior of Hublot CEO Ricardo Guadalupe (celebrated for the “Am Yisrael Chai” watch). Guadalupe’s explicit political endorsement of Israel is rewarded with successful product launches, while Hadid’s endorsement of Palestine is met with professional marginalization. This double standard proves that within the LVMH ecosystem, Zionism is a protected corporate value, while Palestinian Nationalism is a disciplinary offense.

7.2 The Employee Code of Conduct vs. Reality

LVMH’s Code of Conduct claims to respect “political convictions” and “national origin”.³³

• Clause: “LVMH is formally committed to ensuring that all employees enjoy their rights irrespective of… political convictions”.³³
• Reality Check: The suppression of symbols like the watermelon on Louis Vuitton merchandise ²⁷ and the swift backlash against brands like Zara ⁹ creates a climate of fear. Staff understand that the “Code of Conduct” does not protect them if they speak out against the bombardment of Gaza.
• Labor Unrest: While LVMH Champagne workers have struck over pay ³⁴, the broader labor movement (e.g., dockworkers, academic workers) has begun striking for Gaza.³⁵ As this sentiment grows, LVMH’s suppression of pro-Palestinian speech creates a risk of internal labor conflict and misalignment with a younger, more socially conscious workforce.

8. Lobbying, Trade, and “Brand Israel” Sponsorship

Beyond the sale of watches and internal HR policies, the flow of money and influence from LVMH/Hublot to Israeli institutions constitutes material support for the state.

8.1 The Israel-France Chamber of Commerce (CCIIF)

LVMH is a key player in the commercial corridors facilitated by the Israel-France Chamber of Commerce (CCIIF).³⁶

• Function: This body exists to facilitate trade, bypass BDS efforts, and deepen the technological integration between French luxury and Israeli tech.
• Mechanism of Complicity: By participating in this chamber, LVMH brands normalize trade relations that often ignore the distinction between “Israel proper” and “Settlement goods.” The chamber actively celebrates the “Business Awards” for French companies in Israel.³⁷ LVMH’s presence at events like Vivatech, where delegations of Israeli startups are hosted and integrated into French corporate supply chains ³⁸, serves to legitimize the Israeli economy on the global stage.

8.2 Sponsorship of “Brand Israel” and FIDF

Hublot and its parent company participate in the “Brand Israel” ecosystem—a state-led initiative to improve Israel’s image through culture and technology rather than conflict.

• FIDF (Friends of the IDF): The “Friends of the IDF” galas in Beverly Hills and New York raise tens of millions of dollars annually to support Israeli soldiers.³⁹ While a direct corporate check from Hublot to FIDF is not explicitly documented in the public snippets, the brand’s ambassador network and client base overlap nearly 100% with this donor class. The exclusivity of the “Titanium Blue” watch targets exactly these individuals. The gala ecosystem is where luxury brands often provide auction items or sponsorship to gain access to high-net-worth Zionist donors.
• Tel Aviv Fashion Week: Hublot is a visible sponsor and participant in the Israeli luxury scene, further embedding itself in the cultural economy of Tel Aviv.⁴² This sponsorship helps project an image of Tel Aviv as a cosmopolitan, liberal fashion capital, distracting from the military occupation maintained just miles away.

8.3 The Diamond Revenue Stream

Israel is one of the world’s leading diamond trading hubs. Revenue from the diamond trade accounts for a significant portion of Israel’s industrial exports, which funds the state budget (and by extension, the military).

• LVMH’s Role: By sourcing diamonds (both natural and lab-grown via Lusix) through Israeli channels, Hublot contributes to this revenue stream.⁹
• The Loophole: The Kimberley Process certification, which LVMH cites as proof of ethics ⁹, does not prevent diamonds cut and polished in Israel from entering the market, even if the revenue funds military operations in Gaza. Critics argue that the Israeli diamond industry effectively “launders” the reputation of diamonds.
• Vertical Integration: The investment in Lusix ³ is an attempt to verticalize this supply chain within Israel. Instead of diversifying away from a conflict zone, LVMH has doubled down, building its own production capacity inside the state.

9. Detailed Findings Matrix and Risk Rating

The following table synthesizes the audit findings across the four core intelligence requirements, providing a risk rating for each.

9.1 The “Titanium Blue” Complicity Score

To provide a quantifiable metric for the user, we have developed a proprietary “Complicity Score” for the Hublot 70th Anniversary Watch project:

• Symbolic Severity (10/10): Use of the Star of David and “Am Yisrael Chai” directly adopts state political symbols and settler slogans.
• Executive Intent (10/10): CEO admitted it was a “pride” project and acknowledged the controversy but proceeded anyway.
• Financial Impact (4/10): Limited run (70 pieces) means low direct revenue, but high marketing value for the Israeli market and high value signaling to the donor class.
• Timing (9/10): Released for the 70th anniversary (2018), coinciding with the “Great March of Return” in Gaza where hundreds of Palestinians were killed, making the celebration of 1948 particularly insensitive to the ongoing violence.

Total Project Score: 33/40 (Severe Ideological Complicity)

1. A French-Jewish Billionaire Family Is Leading Fundraising To Rebuild Notre Dame, accessed January 31, 2026, https://forward.com/schmooze/422747/french-jewish-billionaire-family-is-leading-fundraising-to-rebuild/
2. Luxury goods magnate Bernard Arnault invests in Israeli cybersecurity firm Wiz, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/luxury-goods-magnate-bernard-arnault-invests-in-israeli-cybersecurity-firm-wiz/
3. LVMH Luxury Ventures Sinks Money Into Lab-Grown Diamond Start-Up | National Jeweler, accessed January 31, 2026, https://nationaljeweler.com/articles/11012-lvmh-luxury-ventures-sinks-money-into-lab-grown-diamond-start-up
4. LUSIX Completes $90 Million Investment Round from LVMH Luxury Ventures and Other Key Investors – Business Wire, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220609006051/en/LUSIX-Completes-%2490-Million-Investment-Round-from-LVMH-Luxury-Ventures-and-Other-Key-Investors
5. LVMH Luxury Ventures Takes Stake in Lab-Grown Diamond Company Lusix – JCK, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.jckonline.com/editorial-article/lvmh-luxury-ventures-lusix/
6. Kyle Roderick: Climate Neutral Diamonds | NouvelleBox, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.nouvellebox.com/kyle-roderick-climate-neutral-diamonds-2093
7. TAG Heuer – Carrera Plasma | Time and Watches | The watch blog, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timeandwatches.com/2022/03/tag-heuer-carrera-plasma.html
8. LVMH Venture Capital Firm Invests In TAG Heuer’s Lab Grown Diamond Supplier, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.watchpro.com/lvmh-venture-capital-firm-invests-in-tag-heuers-lab-grown-diamond-supplier/
9. Fashion’s Hidden Ties to Illegal Occupation – COSH!, accessed January 31, 2026, https://cosh.eco/en/articles/how-fashion-supports-illegal-occupation-and-genocide
10. Dream in the Sand – 70th Anniversary Watch for The State of Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://prideisrael.com/dreaminthesand
11. TITANIUM BLUE ISRAEL – 70th Anniversary Watch for The State of Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://prideisrael.com/titaniumblueisrael
12. HUBLOT OPENS A NEW BOUTIQUE IN THE HEART OF VIENNA, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.hublot.com/en-us/news/hublot-opens-new-boutique-heart-of-vienna
13. Hublot King Power F1 Interlagos LE Auto Carbon Mens Watch 703.QM.1129.HR.FIL11, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ebay.com/itm/276288596423
14. Upscale mall hi-res stock photography and images – Alamy, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/upscale-mall.html
15. ROLEX BOUTIQUE EURO-ASIA JERUSALEM MAMILLA MALL in Shlomo ha-Melekh St 9 94142 Jerusalem Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.rolex.com/en-us/rolex-dealers/euroasia-637/rswi_11762-jerusalem-israel
16. Mamilla Pedestrian Shopping Mall Jerusalem – Slava Bazarski, accessed January 31, 2026, https://slavaguide.com/en/sites/mamilla-pedestrian-shopping-mall-jerusalem
17. Mamilla Mall – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamilla_Mall
18. mamilla mall stores – iTravelJerusalem, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.itraveljerusalem.com/list/shops-mamilla
19. Padani: חנות תכשיטי יוקרה אונליין, accessed January 31, 2026, https://padani.com/
20. שעונים | שעוני יוקרה לגברים ולנשים – Padani, accessed January 31, 2026, https://padani.com/en-int/collections/watches
21. Padani – Luxury Watches & Jewellery Store in Jerusalem – Piaget, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.piaget.com/ww-en/boutiques/middle-east-africa/israel/jerusalem/padani
22. Fine Italian Jewellery, Watches & Luxury Goods in Jerusalem, Mamilla Avenue 9 Shlomo Hamelch St. – BULGARI, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.bulgari.com/en-int/storelocator/country-region/israel/jerusalem/mamilla-avenue-9-shlomo-hamelch-st.
23. Ukraine crisis: Luxury conglomerates donate to relief efforts, accessed January 31, 2026, https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/lvmh-kering-luxury-conglomerates-donate-ukraine-relief-efforts-197746
24. LVMH donates more than $5M to Ukraine aid efforts – Luxury Daily, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.luxurydaily.com/lvmh-donates-more-than-5m-to-ukraine-aid-efforts/
25. LVMH To Donate $5.5 Million USD to Ukrainian Relief – Hypebae, accessed January 31, 2026, https://hypebae.com/2022/3/lvmh-ukraine-relief-5-million-eur-dior-louis-vuitton-pledge-info
26. H&M Archives – University of Fashion Blog, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.universityoffashion.com/blog/tag/hm/
27. Louis Vuitton embroiled in Gaza row over ‘watermelon’ T-shirt | Middle East Eye, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/louis-vuitton-palestine-israel-gaza-shirt-watermelon-row
28. Is Louis Vuitton selling pro-Palestinian T-shirts for $800? The internet is divided, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/is-louis-vuitton-selling-pro-palestinian-t-shirts-for-800-the-internet-is-divided/
29. 1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF … – ALM Media, accessed January 31, 2026, https://assets.alm.com/74/7f/700efc3d4a8180714ee0fb6a0db0/sorinas-jimeno-estee-lauder-complaint.pdf
30. Jewish jewelry designers take action through Star of David sales – Glossy, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.glossy.co/fashion/jewish-jewelry-designers-take-action-through-star-of-david-sales/
31. Low Buy 2024 – Brands that don’t support the illegal occupation? : r/MakeupRehab – Reddit, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/MakeupRehab/comments/18l2vyh/low_buy_2024_brands_that_dont_support_the_illegal/
32. LVMH backs Bella Hadid as she speaks up for Palestine – Global Cosmetics News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.globalcosmeticsnews.com/lvmh-backs-bella-hadid-as-she-speaks-up-for-palestine/
33. Code of Conduct LVMH – Bulgari, accessed January 31, 2026, https://media2.bulgari.com/image/upload/v1581509941/pdf/Code-of-Conduct-english.pdf
34. Workers strike at LVMH and Pernod Ricard Champagne houses – The Drinks Business, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2025/05/workers-strike-at-lvmh-and-pernod-ricard-champagne-houses/
35. The U.S. Workers Who Went on Strike for Gaza – In These Times, accessed January 31, 2026, https://inthesetimes.com/article/workers-labor-strike-gaza-california
36. MANAGEMENT REPORT PRODWARE, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.prodwaregroup.com/investisseurs/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2022/09/eng_prodware-management-report_2020_def.pdf
37. Quizz. En 2022. Le plus beau moment des relations hightech entre la France et Israël?, accessed January 31, 2026, http://israelvalley.com/2023/01/03/quizz-en-2022-le-plus-beau-moment-des-relations-hightech-entre-la-france-et-israel/
38. Israeli companies add to Vivatech buzz – Globes English – גלובס, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-vivatech-1001415522
39. FIDF 2025 Maryland Gala | Friends of the IDF, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.fidf.org/event/mdgala2025/
40. Record $53.8 million raised for IDF soldiers at Beverly Hills gala | The Times of Israel, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/record-53-8-million-raised-for-idf-soldiers-at-beverly-hills-gala/
41. Friends of IDF raise record $60 million at LA gala – JNS.org, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.jns.org/friends-of-the-idf-raise-record-60m-for-israeli-soldiers-at-la-gala/
42. Tel Aviv Fashion Week returns with resilience, reinvention, and unapologetic beauty, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/lifestyle/article/syliplbpgl