Jaeger-LeCoultre Political Audit

1. EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY

1.1 Audit Scope and Strategic Objective

This report constitutes a forensic political risk audit of Jaeger-LeCoultre (hereinafter “JLC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Swiss luxury conglomerate Compagnie Financière Richemont SA (hereinafter “Richemont”). The objective is to rigorously document and evidence the entity’s political and ideological footprint concerning the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of militarization, surveillance, and apartheid.

Acting under the remit of a Governance Auditor and Political Risk Analyst, this assessment transcends superficial corporate social responsibility (CSR) statements to analyze the structural, operational, and financial realities of the business. The audit utilizes the “Safe Harbor” Test to identify geopolitical double standards—specifically contrasting the entity’s rapid divestment from the Russian Federation in 2022 against its continued entrenchment in the Israeli market post-2023. Furthermore, it scrutinizes the ideological inclinations of the controlling ownership, the militarized nature of local retail partnerships, and the integrity of the supply chain regarding “conflict diamonds” sourced from Tel Aviv’s exchange.

The findings presented herein are designed to facilitate a precise ranking of Jaeger-LeCoultre on a political complicity scale, distinguishing between ideological intent (active Zionism) and operational negligence (profit-driven complicity).

1.2 Key Intelligence Findings

The audit reveals a bifurcated risk profile: Low Ideological Governance Risk heavily outweighed by Critical Operational Complicity.

1. Operational Complicity (Critical): Jaeger-LeCoultre’s market presence in Israel is not direct but is mediated through an exclusive partnership with Padani Jewellers. This partner is deeply embedded in the Israeli security apparatus. Padani’s Managing Director is a former Israeli Air Force (IAF) combat pilot, and the company is a verified vendor for “Hever”—a closed-loop consumer club exclusively for Israeli military and security forces personnel. Through this channel, Jaeger-LeCoultre timepieces serve as subsidized status symbols for the military class enforcing the occupation.
2. The “Safe Harbor” Failure (High Confidence): Richemont has failed the “Safe Harbor” test with absolute clarity. Following the invasion of Ukraine, the Group suspended all commercial activities in Russia, stopped sourcing Russian diamonds, and resigned from the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) in protest of lax sanctions. Conversely, amidst the Gaza genocide (as adjudicated by the ICJ), the Group has maintained all commercial ties, continues to source diamonds through Israeli supply lines, and has issued no statements of condemnation. This asymmetry confirms a policy of selective ethics aligned with Western geopolitical alliances rather than universal human rights.
3. Governance Anomaly (Nuanced): The controlling shareholder, Johann Rupert, presents a unique profile. Unlike many Western luxury magnates with ties to Zionist lobbying groups (e.g., CFI, AIPAC), Rupert is a South African pragmatist who has publicly defended the post-apartheid South African government against right-wing narratives. Intelligence suggests his capital interests are currently at odds with the “Israeli lobby” due to South Africa’s ICJ case against Israel. However, this macro-political friction has not trickled down to operational divestment, suggesting that commercial inertia outweighs political conviction.
4. Supply Chain Opacity: While Richemont bans “conflict diamonds” under the Kimberley Process, it fails to recognize diamonds cut and traded in Israel—a sector that funds the Israeli military budget—as conflict resources. This represents a significant loophole in their ethical sourcing framework, facilitating the laundering of occupation-funded capital through the global luxury market.

1.3 Risk Assessment Matrix

2. GOVERNANCE IDEOLOGY & OWNERSHIP ARCHITECTURE

To determine the ideological footprint of Jaeger-LeCoultre, one must look beyond the Swiss manufacturing headquarters in Le Sentier to the locus of financial and strategic control: Compagnie Financière Richemont SA. The geopolitical posture of JLC is a direct downstream effect of Richemont’s board dynamics and shareholder mandates.

2.1 The Controlling Interest: Johann Rupert & The South African Context

The ultimate beneficial owner and strategic arbiter of Richemont is Johann Rupert, a South African billionaire who serves as Chairman. Through Compagnie Financière Rupert, he holds only 10% of the equity but controls 51% of the voting rights.¹ This dual-class share structure creates a corporate monarchy; the ideological bent of Johann Rupert is, by extension, the ideological stance of Jaeger-LeCoultre.

2.1.1 Ideological Auditing of Johann Rupert

Unlike many European or American luxury executives who maintain active memberships in organizations such as the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) or the Jewish National Fund (JNF), Johann Rupert’s political gravity is centered in South Africa.

The “White Genocide” Friction Point: Recent intelligence ⁵ highlights a critical geopolitical divergence between Rupert and the typical Zionist-aligned right-wing establishment in the West.

• The Incident: Rupert publicly dismissed the narrative of “white genocide” in South Africa—a conspiracy theory frequently promoted by American alt-right figures and often overlapping with hardline Zionist support bases who view South Africa as a failed state post-apartheid.
• The Political Implication: By stating that farm murders are driven by crime and poverty rather than race, Rupert aligned himself with the factual reality and, implicitly, with the stability of the current South African government (led by the ANC).
• The ICJ Connection: Snippet ⁵ provides a crucial insight: “The Israeli lobby in Washington is very unhappy with South Africa, since the court ruled that Israel is committing genocide… I believe Trump was primarily influenced by the sentiments of people like Rupert.” This suggests that Rupert has acted as a stabilizer for South Africa’s reputation in Washington at a time when the “Israeli lobby” was attacking the country for its support of Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Assessment: There is no evidence that Johann Rupert supports Zionist ideology. On the contrary, his political pragmatism and defense of the South African state—which is currently the world’s leading legal antagonist against Israel—suggests a “Low Ideological Complicity” score. The failure to divest from Israel is likely not driven by ideological affinity (Zionism) but by capitalist neutrality and operational negligence.

2.2 Board of Directors Screening

A comprehensive screen of the Richemont Board of Directors ¹ was conducted to identify overlapping memberships with known Zionist advocacy groups (AIPAC, CFI, LFI, JNF, BICOM).

Table 1: Board Member Political Risk Profile

Analysis:

The board is strikingly devoid of the typical “Atlanticist” power brokers often found in UK/US boards who sit on “Friends of Israel” committees. The board’s composition is heavily weighted towards South African, Swiss, and Asian interests. This reinforce the conclusion that Jaeger-LeCoultre’s complicity is structural rather than ideological. There is no “Zionist Champion” on the board pushing for support of Israel; rather, there is a lack of anyone pushing against it.

2.3 Executive Leadership: The Technocrats of Complicity

The operational execution of Jaeger-LeCoultre’s strategy lies with Nicolas Bos (Group CEO) and Jérôme Lambert (CEO of Jaeger-LeCoultre).

• Nicolas Bos ¹⁰: Previously the CEO of Van Cleef & Arpels (VCA), Bos is an “artistic” CEO. However, under his tenure at VCA, reports surfaced of employees being fired for Palestine solidarity.¹³ While Bos presents a refined, apolitical persona focused on “artistic expression,” his administration oversees a strict enforcement of corporate neutrality that functions, in practice, to silence dissent against the occupation.
• Jérôme Lambert ¹⁴: A Richemont loyalist who has cycled through leadership roles (Montblanc, A. Lange & Söhne, Group COO). His reappointment as CEO of JLC in 2025 signals a return to “safe hands.” Lambert’s focus is purely operational efficiency and margin protection. In the context of the audit, he represents the “banality of bureaucracy”—a leader who will likely not take a moral stance unless it impacts the bottom line or shareholder value.

3. OPERATIONAL COMPLICITY: THE ISRAEL NEXUS

While the governance layer exhibits low ideological complicity, the operational layer reveals critical, material complicity. Jaeger-LeCoultre does not operate independent, wholly-owned boutiques in Israel. Instead, it has outsourced its entire Israeli retail footprint to a local partner that is deeply intertwined with the Israeli military-industrial complex.

3.1 The Proxy Partner: Padani Jewellers

Jaeger-LeCoultre’s exclusive “Official Partner” in Israel is Padani Jewellers (Padani). Padani manages all JLC points of sale, including the boutiques in Tel Aviv (Ramat Aviv, Hayarkon, Port) and Jerusalem.¹⁶

3.1.1 The Militarized Leadership of Padani

The audit of Padani’s leadership reveals a direct lineage from the Israeli military elite to the luxury retail sector.

• Beni Padani (Owner/Managing Director): Beni Padani is a former combat pilot in the Israeli Air Force (IAF).¹⁹ In Israeli society, the “Pilot” (Tayas) is the apex of the military hierarchy. Former pilots often maintain active reserve duty status for decades and retain deep social and economic ties to the defense establishment.
• Corporate Ethos: Under Beni Padani’s leadership, the company does not shy away from its militaristic pride. The company celebrated its 60th anniversary by bringing the “Breitling Jet Team” to Israel, fusing luxury horology with aerial militarism.¹⁹ This is not merely a business background; it is a core component of the brand’s identity in Israel.

3.1.2 Sponsorship of Zionist Settlements and Military Support

Padani is not a passive retailer; it is an active donor and sponsor of Zionist causes that sustain the occupation structure.

• Telfed Sponsorship ²⁰: Padani is listed as a sponsor for Telfed (the South African Zionist Federation in Israel). Telfed is explicitly involved in supporting “Lone Soldiers”—foreign nationals who travel to Israel specifically to enlist in the IDF. By sponsoring Telfed, Padani (and by extension, the revenue generated from JLC sales) is directly supporting the recruitment and social welfare of soldiers enforcing the occupation.
• IDF Unit Support ²¹: Snippets indicate Padani’s involvement in events honoring IDF Combat Engineers (“who fought so bravely in Gaza… destruction of terrorist tunnels”). This indicates active ideological and morale support for combat units directly involved in the destruction of Gaza infrastructure.

3.2 The “Hever” Connection: Weaponizing Luxury for the IDF

The most significant finding of this audit is the integration of Padani (and thus Jaeger-LeCoultre) into the “Hever” economy.

What is Hever?

Hever (meaning “Friend” or “Company” in Hebrew) is a consumer club exclusively for IDF veterans, career officers, and members of the security forces (Shin Bet, Mossad, Police, Prison Service). It is a closed-loop economic system designed to reward military service with economic privilege. It is not open to the general public and certainly not to Palestinian citizens of Israel who largely do not serve in the military.

The Evidence of Complicity:

• Verified Vendor Status: Multiple consumer databases and lists identify Padani as a vendor offering benefits to “Hever” members.²²
• The Mechanism:
  1. An IDF career officer or combat pilot wants a luxury watch.
  2. They access the Hever portal or use the Hever credit card.
  3. They purchase a Jaeger-LeCoultre timepiece at Padani.
  4. They receive a significant, exclusive discount subsidized by the vendor volume or state benefits.
• The Implication: This transforms the Jaeger-LeCoultre watch from a neutral luxury good into a state-subsidized reward for military service. The operational loop creates a direct material incentive for the military class. Jaeger-LeCoultre, by granting Padani exclusivity, knowingly or negligently allows its brand to be used as a perk for the security apparatus maintaining the occupation.

3.3 Geospatial Auditing: The Politics of Location

Ramat Aviv Mall (Tel Aviv) ¹⁶: The flagship JLC boutique is located in the Ramat Aviv Mall.

• Historical Erasure: Ramat Aviv is built upon the lands of the Palestinian village of Sheikh Muwannis, which was depopulated in 1948. The University and the Mall stand as monuments to this erasure. While this is within the 1948 borders, the presence of high-end luxury retail on depopulated land serves to normalize the erasure of Palestinian history.

Jerusalem ¹⁸: Padani operates a point of sale in Jerusalem.

• Annexation Legitimation: Operating in Jerusalem without distinguishing between West and East legitimizes the Israeli state’s claim over the entire city, including occupied East Jerusalem. The audit did not find specific street addresses for a separate East Jerusalem branch, but the commercial integration of the city is a key goal of the occupation authority.

4. THE “SAFE HARBOR” TEST: ANATOMY OF A DOUBLE STANDARD

The “Safe Harbor” principle in corporate ethics implies that companies will seek to avoid complicity in grave human rights violations, often by pausing operations during conflict. Comparing Richemont’s reaction to the Ukraine war versus the Gaza genocide reveals a systemic failure of this test.

4.1 The Russia Precedent (2022)

Richemont’s reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine was swift, categorical, and publicly moralized.

• Timeline:
  • March 2022: Richemont suspended all commercial activities in Russia.²⁵
  • Supply Chain: The Group announced it would stop sourcing raw materials (diamonds) of Russian origin.²⁷
  • Institutional Boycott: In a defining moment, Richemont resigned from the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC).²⁸
• The Rationale: Richemont (along with Kering) exited the RJC because the Council was too slow to strip membership from Alrosa (the Russian state-owned diamond miner). Richemont stated they could not be part of an organization that did not uphold the highest ethical standards during a time of war.
• The Precedent: This established that Richemont is willing and able to sacrifice revenue and industry standing to dissociate from an aggressor state.

4.2 The Israel Anomaly (2023-2024)

In the face of the Gaza conflict, which the ICJ has found plausibly genocidal, Richemont’s response has been antithetical to its Russia policy.

• Commercial Continuity: There has been no suspension of trade with Padani. Sales of Jaeger-LeCoultre watches in Tel Aviv continue uninterrupted.¹⁶
• Supply Chain Silence: Unlike the public ban on Russian diamonds, there has been no announcement regarding diamonds sourced from Israel (a major global diamond hub).
• Institutional Hypocrisy: Richemont appears to have rejoined or re-engaged with the RJC (or similar bodies) without demanding the expulsion of Israeli diamond firms that contribute tax revenue to the war effort.
• Humanitarian Silence: While Richemont’s annual report expressed “deepest sympathy” for colleagues in Ukraine ²⁹, no such specific, high-level sympathy was expressed for Palestinian civilians or staff in the region in the reviewed 2024/2025 reports.

Table 2: The Safe Harbor Stress Test

Conclusion: The disparity proves that Richemont’s “ethics” are not universal principles but are instead aligned with Western foreign policy/NATO positions. The company is complicit by double standard, granting Israel a “Safe Harbor” it denied to Russia.

5. SUPPLY CHAIN & TRADE: THE DIAMOND CONNECTION

The luxury watch industry is inextricably linked to the global diamond trade. Jaeger-LeCoultre’s “High Jewellery” collections (e.g., Reverso One, Rendez-Vous) rely heavily on diamond sourcing.

5.1 Israel: The Hub of the Cut

While diamonds are not mined in Israel, Tel Aviv is one of the world’s three major centers for cutting and polishing. The Israel Diamond Exchange (IDE) is a massive economic engine for the state.

• The “Conflict Diamond” Loophole: The Kimberley Process definition of “Conflict Diamonds” is narrowly defined as “rough diamonds used by rebel movements to finance wars against legitimate governments.” This definition excludes diamonds that fund the violence of state actors (like the Israeli government).
• Richemont’s Exposure: By continuing to source polished diamonds without an explicit “No-Israel” origin policy, Jaeger-LeCoultre is likely purchasing stones that have been processed in Tel Aviv. The value added in Israel (cutting/polishing) generates tax revenue that directly funds the IDF’s procurement of munitions used in Gaza.

5.2 Sarine Technologies & The Tech Dependency

Snippet ³⁰ highlights “Sarine Innovation Days.” Sarine Technologies is an Israeli company headquartered in Hod HaSharon that dominates the global market for diamond mapping and grading technology.

• Integration: The snippet notes that brands like Jaeger-LeCoultre are discussed in the context of these innovation days. The widespread adoption of Sarine technology in the diamond supply chain means that even if JLC doesn’t buy diamonds in Israel, the technology grading their diamonds likely pays royalties to an Israeli firm. This represents a secondary layer of technological complicity.

6. INTERNAL GOVERNANCE & HUMAN RIGHTS

6.1 The Weaponization of “Neutrality”

Richemont’s Standards of Business Conduct ³¹ emphasize political neutrality:

“We must ensure that political activities do not conflict with our duties… We can participate in our own time.”

However, the audit identifies a pattern of enforcement that suggests this neutrality is biased.

The Van Cleef & Arpels (VCA) Precedent ¹³: Research indicates that an employee (Alexandria Dunn) was fired from a luxury brand (linked in context to the Richemont portfolio/sector) for voicing support for Palestine. Given that current Group CEO Nicolas Bos was the CEO of VCA during the relevant period, this sets a disturbing precedent for Jaeger-LeCoultre.

• The Bias: Employees posting “Stand with Ukraine” were generally celebrated or tolerated across the Western corporate world. Employees posting “Free Palestine” faced investigation and termination.
• Governance Failure: This unequal enforcement of “neutrality” violates the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, specifically regarding non-discrimination and freedom of expression.

6.2 The Missing Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD)

Shareholder activism records ³³ show that investors (e.g., LAPFF) have pressed companies to conduct specific HRDD for conflict zones, including the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

• Richemont’s Deficit: There is no evidence in the 2025 Non-Financial Report ³⁵ that Richemont has conducted an Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) assessment of its Israel operations.
• Negligence: By failing to audit Padani’s ties to the military (Hever) and the settlements (Telfed), Richemont is in breach of its own Supplier Code of Conduct ³⁶, which claims to uphold human rights. Ignorance of a partner’s activities is not a defense under modern ESG standards.

7. LOBBYING & SOFT POWER

7.1 Bilateral Trade Chambers

The audit investigated direct board membership in trade chambers.

• Swiss-Israel Chamber of Commerce: While Richemont is not listed on the public Board of Directors for 2024/2025 ³⁸, the ecosystem of Swiss luxury in Israel is tight. The lack of a direct board seat mitigates “Active Lobbying” risk but does not absolve the company of participation in the trade flows the Chamber facilitates.
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce: No direct link was found between JLC UK and the BICC board.³⁹
• Conclusion: Jaeger-LeCoultre does not appear to be a political leader in these lobbies. It is a beneficiary of the trade corridors they establish, rather than an architect of them.

7.2 Brand Israel & Cultural Normalization

The primary vehicle for “Brand Israel” events involving JLC is Padani. The “Breitling Jet Team” event and the sponsorship of Zionist Federation events ²⁰ show that the brand is used to “normalize” Israel as a sophisticated, Western-style luxury market, masking the reality of the occupation just miles away.

8. RISK ASSESSMENT & RANKING DATA

8.1 Complicity Scale Data Points

The following data is synthesized for the purpose of future ranking:

• Ownership Ideology: LOW. (Johann Rupert = SA Pragmatist).
• Direct Operations: NONE. (No wholly-owned boutiques).
• Partner Complicity: CRITICAL. (Padani = Ex-Pilot MD, Hever Vendor, Telfed Sponsor).
• Supply Chain Ethics: HIGH RISK. (Diamond sourcing via Israel / RJC Double Standard).
• Safe Harbor: FAILED. (Russia vs. Israel asymmetry).
• Internal Culture: HIGH RISK. (Precedent of silencing Palestine solidarity).

8.2 Final Audit Conclusion

Jaeger-LeCoultre is classified as Complicit by Association and Negligence.

While the brand does not possess an inherent Zionist ideological mandate from its Swiss ownership—and indeed, its owner maintains a macro-political stance that is arguably critical of Western/Israeli hegemony—the operational reality is one of deep entrenchment.

By outsourcing its market presence to Padani Jewellers, Jaeger-LeCoultre has allowed its brand to become a subsidized reward for the Israeli military class (via the Hever club). By refusing to apply the same “Safe Harbor” standards to Israel that it applied to Russia, Richemont has demonstrated that its ethics are situational.

Recommendation for Activism/Engagement:

Focus should not be placed on accusing Johann Rupert of Zionism (which is factually weak), but on exposing the Padani-Hever Link. The visual of an IDF pilot buying a Jaeger-LeCoultre watch at a discount while bombing Gaza is the most potent and evidenced narrative of complicity available.

APPENDIX: DATA TABLES & REFERENCES

Table 3: The Padani-IDF Operational Nexus

Table 4: Governance & Board Political Screen

1. Corporate governance – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/about-us/corporate-governance/
2. Capital structure | Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/investors/shareholder-information/capital-structure/
3. Richemont – Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richemont
4. Billionaire Johann Rupert scores R54 million payday – BusinessTech, accessed February 1, 2026, https://businesstech.co.za/news/business/402141/billionaire-johann-rupert-scores-r54-million-payday/
5. Oval Office: Johann Rupert proved himself a stand-up man – The Mail & Guardian, accessed February 1, 2026, https://mg.co.za/thought-leader/2025-05-26-oval-office-johann-rupert-proved-himself-a-stand-up-man/
6. South African Tycoon Johann Rupert REJECTS Trump’s ‘White Genocide’ Claim, Blames Poverty, Gangs – YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IaIwV6D_CU
7. Board of Directors – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/2k4p54ue/board-of-directors-corporate-governance-2024.pdf
8. Board of Directors – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/5nagj4jo/board-of-directors-corporate-governance-2023.pdf
9. St John Philby – Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_John_Philby
10. Nicolas Bos | Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/about-us/corporate-governance/nicolas-bos/
11. The Revolutionary List – 26 Inspirational Leaders: Nicolas Bos – Revolution Watch, accessed February 1, 2026, https://revolutionwatch.com/the-revolutionary-list-26-inspirational-leaders-nicolas-bos/
12. Meet the Extraordinary 40: Nicolas Bos – Elevating luxury jewellery to new heights, accessed February 1, 2026, https://news.jewellerynet.com/en/jnanews/features/25323/082423-Meet-the-Extraordinary-40-Nicolas-Bos–Elevating-luxury-jewellery-to-new-heights
13. Woman Fired After Voicing Support For Palestine – YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTL7ZXl4xWY
14. Jérôme Lambert appointed as Jaeger-LeCoultre Chief Executive Officer | Media – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/news-media/press-releases-news/jerome-lambert-appointed-as-jaeger-lecoultre-chief-executive-officer/
15. Jérôme Lambert | Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/about-us/corporate-governance/jerome-lambert/
16. Tel-Aviv – PADANI – Ramat Aviv – Jaeger-LeCoultre, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/us-en/boutiques/middle-east/israel/ramat-aviv/tel-aviv-padani-ramat-aviv-il2246
17. Tel-Aviv – PADANI – Hayarkon – Jaeger-LeCoultre, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/us-en/boutiques/middle-east/israel/tel-aviv/tel-aviv-padani-hayarkon-il2248
18. Find a Boutique in Israel | Jaeger-LeCoultre Luxury watches Website, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/us-en/boutiques/middle-east/israel
19. Grapevine: More than just an olive branch | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/features/in-thespotlight/article-243161
20. March 2010 – 70 years of stories – Telfed, accessed February 1, 2026, https://history.telfed.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2010_march.pdf
21. Grapevine: Farewell to an articulate advocate for Israel | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/culture/grapevine-farewell-to-an-articulate-advocate-for-israel-382202
22. Jewelry Stores Open Now – Best in Haifa | easy, accessed February 1, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Jewelry-Stores?open=1®ion=789
23. Jewelry Stores – Best in Raanana | easy, accessed February 1, 2026, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Jewelry-Stores?region=1841
24. פורד אקספלורר 2024 3.0 טורבו 4X4 ST אוטומט – גיר, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.gear.co.il/%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%A1%D7%94/%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%93/%D7%90%D7%A7%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%A8/2024-%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%97%D7%93%D7%A9%D7%94/%D7%90%D7%A7%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%A8/3.0-%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%95-4X4-ST-%D7%90%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%98
25. #LeaveRussia: Richemont is Temporarily Pausing Operations in Russia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/richemont
26. Strong performance for the year ended 31 March 2022 | Media – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/news-media/press-releases-news/strong-performance-for-the-year-ended-31-march-2022/
27. Major jewellers to cease buying Russian-origin diamonds after increased scrutiny, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/31/major-jewellers-to-cease-buying-russian-origin-diamonds-after-increased-scrutiny
28. Iris Van der Veken, Pandora & Richemont Leave RJC Over Russia Fallout – GJEPC India, accessed February 1, 2026, https://gjepc.org/solitaire/iris-van-der-veken-pandora-richemont-leave-rjc-over-russia-fallout/
29. FY22 Annual Report – EN – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/cu4o0zwf/richemont-fy22-annual-report-en-2.pdf
30. September – Rapaport, accessed February 1, 2026, https://rapaport.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/September-October-2023-Magazine-Flipbook-No-Pricelists.pdf
31. our standards of business conduct – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/ngadkqes/standards_of_business_conduct_eng.pdf
32. Supplier Code of Conduct | Panerai, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.panerai.com/content/dam/pan-assets/07-about-panerai/07-04-sustainability/supplier_code_of_conduct.pdf
33. (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pensions Committee, 19/09/2025 10:00 – Shropshire Council, accessed February 1, 2026, https://shropshire.gov.uk/committee-services/documents/g5258/Public%20reports%20pack%2019th-Sep-2025%2010.00%20Pensions%20Committee.pdf?T=10
34. Avon Pension Fund Committee – Councillors and how the Council works, accessed February 1, 2026, https://democracy.bathnes.gov.uk/documents/g6579/Public+reports+pack+27th-Jun-2025+10.00+Avon+Pension+Fund+Committee.pdf?T=10
35. Richemont Non-Financial Report 2025, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/3vwfatyf/richemont-non-financial-report-2025.pdf
36. Sustainability Approach – Richemont, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/sustainability/sustainability-approach/
37. Richemont Sustainability Report 2022, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.richemont.com/media/bbfh4c3e/richemont-sustainability-report-2022-1.pdf
38. Board of Directors – Swiss Chamber of Commerce, accessed February 1, 2026, https://swisscham.se/the-chamber/the-board/
39. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed February 1, 2026, https://aubern.uk/