Temu Political Audit

Corporate evolution and strategic positioning of the PDD ecosystem

The emergence of Temu as a dominant force in global e-commerce represents a significant shift in the digital retail landscape, moving from a domestic-focused social commerce model in China to a pervasive international presence within a span of less than two years. To understand the political and ideological footprint of Temu, it is necessary to first analyze the structural foundation of its parent entity, PDD Holdings Inc. Originally founded as Pinduoduo, a platform that revolutionized agricultural and value-based shopping in China, the company underwent a major corporate rebranding and restructuring in 2023, coinciding with the rapid global expansion of Temu.¹ This transition involved not only a change in name but a strategic relocation of its principal executive offices from Shanghai to Dublin, Ireland.¹ This move to a Western European capital is frequently interpreted by political risk analysts as an attempt to leverage favorable corporate tax regimes and to position the entity as a “multinational commerce group” rather than a purely Chinese firm, thereby distancing it from the heightening geopolitical friction between Beijing and Washington.¹

The growth trajectory of Temu is unprecedented in the e-commerce sector. Following its launch in the United States in September 2022, the platform expanded into 51 countries within a year, reaching over 250 million downloads globally by late 2023.¹ This expansion has been characterized by an aggressive marketing strategy and a “direct-from-factory” model that connects Chinese manufacturers directly with global consumers, bypassing traditional retail intermediaries and the regulatory scrutiny that often accompanies them.⁴ This model relies heavily on the “de minimis” tax exemption, which allows shipments under a certain value—usually $800 in the U.S.—to enter the country duty-free and with minimal customs inspection.⁶ This structural reliance on trade loopholes has significant implications for political complicity audits, as it suggests an entity that prioritizes operational fluidity and regulatory avoidance over the structured transparency required to monitor supply chain ethics, including the sourcing of goods from conflict zones or occupied territories.

The ideological orientation of such a fast-moving entity is often obscured by its relentless focus on growth and technical optimization. Unlike legacy Western corporations that have established CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) frameworks and long-standing relationships with various political advocacy groups, PDD Holdings operates with a degree of opacity regarding its non-commercial affiliations. The company’s market capitalization, which has seen surges of over 50 percent in recent fiscal periods, places it among the top ten retail and e-commerce companies globally, yet its public disclosures remain strictly confined to financial performance and material business risks.⁸ This “Strict Neutrality” in public messaging is a hallmark of the company’s approach to the global market, where it seeks to avoid alienating diverse customer bases while navigating the complex demands of both the Chinese state and Western regulators.¹⁰

Governance ideology: Executive and board audit

The governance of Temu is centralized within the board of directors of PDD Holdings, as Temu itself does not maintain an independent board or a separate executive leadership structure dedicated solely to political or ideological affairs.¹² The audit of this leadership team focuses on identifying ties to Zionist advocacy, pro-Israel lobbying, or a history of political engagement that might influence corporate policy regarding the occupation of Palestine.

Executive leadership profiles

Lei Chen serves as the Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer of PDD Holdings, a role he has held since December 2025 after a tenure as Chairman and CEO dating back to 2020.¹³ Chen is a foundational figure in the company, having previously served as the Chief Technology Officer during Pinduoduo’s formative years from 2016 to 2020.¹³ His background is deeply rooted in the technical and academic spheres of data science and machine learning. He received his bachelor’s degree from Tsinghua University and a doctoral degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, followed by professional stints at U.S. tech giants Google, Yahoo, and IBM.¹³ His career trajectory reflects a commitment to the “techno-political” optimization of e-commerce platforms, with an emphasis on data mining and algorithmic efficiency.⁶ There is no record in public filings or biographical data of Lei Chen holding membership in, or donating to, organizations such as the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), AIPAC, or the Jewish National Fund (JNF).¹³ His public persona is entirely centered on the technological and operational growth of PDD Holdings, with no documented history of pro-Israel advocacy or involvement in Middle Eastern geopolitical causes.¹³

Jiazhen Zhao, who shares the Co-Chairman and Co-CEO responsibilities, is also a founding member of the company.¹³ Zhao’s expertise lies in the operational and supply chain aspects of the business, having led the Duo Duo Grocery initiative and overseen the company’s agricultural category operations.¹³ His professional history, which includes a degree in e-commerce management from the South China University of Technology, is characterized by a focus on the domestic logistics of the Chinese market before the pivot to global e-commerce with Temu.¹³ Like Chen, Zhao does not have a documented history of political advocacy outside the scope of Chinese commercial development, and he lacks any discernible ties to Zionist pressure groups or Israeli state institutions.¹³

The board’s composition as a whole is notable for its lack of traditional Western political activists. Instead, it is populated by individuals with extensive backgrounds in regional banking, food science, and Southeast Asian diplomacy.

Board of directors and external affiliations

The presence of George Yong-Boon Yeo on the board is particularly relevant to this audit due to his extensive career in international diplomacy. Yeo served for 23 years in the Singaporean government, holding key portfolios including Minister for Foreign Affairs.¹³ In July 2006, while serving as Foreign Minister, Yeo was part of a delegation of ASEAN ministers that issued a formal statement “condemning Israel’s latest use of disproportionate force in Gaza and in the West Bank” and urged that “Israel’s excessive military reprisals” should not be tolerated.¹⁷ Historical diplomatic records also indicate that Yeo has been critical of Israel’s “insensitivity” to the regional dynamics of Southeast Asia, noting that Israel had occasionally “leaked information” or taken actions that were “highly embarrassing” for diplomatic neighbors.¹⁸ These records suggest that the most politically active member of the PDD board has a documented history of publicly criticizing Israeli military and state policy, rather than supporting Zionist interests or the occupation of Palestine.

Other independent directors, such as Anthony Kam Ping Leung and Ivonne Rietjens, maintain profiles that are strictly professional and academic. Kam’s career in the financial services industry in Asia, including senior roles at HSBC in China and Singapore, has focused on risk management, treasury control, and financial accounting.¹³ Rietjens is a renowned expert in toxicology and food safety, with her external roles being confined to scientific advisory panels and academic institutions.¹³ Neither individual has been linked to the “Institutional Legitimation” of the Israeli state through honors, state-backed academic partnerships, or leadership roles in pro-Israel pressure groups.¹³

Ownership structure and principal shareholder audit

The ultimate control of Temu resides in the ownership structure of PDD Holdings, which is heavily influenced by its founder and largest shareholder, Zheng (Colin) Huang. Although Huang resigned from his formal positions as CEO and Chairman in 2020 and 2021, he remains the dominant ideological and financial force behind the company, holding approximately 1.41 billion shares, or 24.8% of the total ownership.¹²

Colin Huang’s philanthropic and external activities provide an window into the ideological framework of the company’s primary owner. Through the Starry Night Foundation, Huang has committed significant resources to education, biotechnology, and sustainable agriculture.¹⁹ His focus is described as “modest, analytical, and intellectual,” prioritizing scientific research and “AI-driven supply chains” over public political discourse.¹⁹ There is no available evidence of Huang or the Starry Night Foundation providing financial support to Zionist organizations, settlement-funding entities like the JNF, or Israeli military-welfare groups like the FIDF.¹⁹

The institutional ownership of PDD Holdings involves major global asset managers, which brings the company into the sphere of Western ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) monitoring. However, these holdings are typically held through large-scale index and growth funds rather than strategic political partnerships.

Principal shareholders and institutional context

The involvement of Tencent Holdings as a principal shareholder and strategic partner since 2017 is also significant.¹² Tencent, one of China’s largest tech conglomerates, provides the digital infrastructure—including WeChat and WeChat Pay—that facilitated Pinduoduo’s early growth.¹² Tencent’s own corporate ideology is closely aligned with Chinese state interests and market expansion rather than the Zionist political project. The audit reveals no evidence that Tencent has influenced PDD or Temu to adopt policies favorable to the Israeli occupation or militarization.¹³

Furthermore, the company does not utilize a “Founder Share” or structural lock designed to ensure service to a specific foreign regime.¹⁶ The relocation of its executive offices to Dublin further suggests a desire to remain a “Sovereign Fusion” with the global market rather than with any single political ideology outside of its Chinese origin.¹

Lobbying, trade, and bilateral affiliations

A critical component of political complicity is the extent to which an entity engages in the promotion of a state’s narrative through lobbying and trade associations. The audit conducted a thorough review of memberships in bilateral trade chambers and the sponsorship of events associated with “Brand Israel.”

There is no record of PDD Holdings or Temu being a member of the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce or the Israel-Britain Business Council.¹⁰ Furthermore, a search of the company’s official news releases from 2023 to 2025 reveals no mentions of “Innovation Days,” “Brand Israel” festivals, or any partnerships with Israeli state institutions.¹⁰ The company’s lobbying efforts are almost entirely focused on defensive measures in the United States and the European Union, specifically regarding trade tariffs, consumer protection laws, and allegations of forced labor in its Chinese supply chain.⁶

In the U.S., Temu has been the subject of intensive inquiry by the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.⁹ These inquiries have focused on the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and the potential presence of forced labor from the Xinjiang region in Temu’s supply chain.¹ While these investigations represent a severe form of political and ethical scrutiny, they are unrelated to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The absence of similar lobbying efforts or inquiries regarding Israeli settlements suggests that Temu is not viewed as a significant actor in the Middle Eastern political arena by Western regulators.

Unlike some major tech firms that actively court the Israeli technology sector as a source of “battle-tested” innovation, Temu’s brand identity is built on the efficiency of the Chinese manufacturing base.¹ The platform’s marketing materials emphasize “extreme low prices” and “social commerce,” with no evidence of militaristic branding or the leveraging of Israeli military service as a corporate asset.¹

Lobbying and trade focus comparison

The audit concludes that Temu treats Israel as a standard commercial market, engaging only in necessary logistical partnerships to facilitate the delivery of goods to local consumers. It does not engage in “Structured Advocacy” or use corporate influence to shape legislation in favor of the Israeli state.⁹

The Safe Harbor test: Comparative geopolitical response

The “Safe Harbor” test evaluates whether a company applies a “Double Standard” in its reaction to different global conflicts. This is particularly relevant when comparing a company’s response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict versus the Israel-Gaza conflict.

In its regulatory filings, PDD Holdings addresses both conflicts under the umbrella of “geopolitical instability.” In a 2024 SEC prospectus, the company noted that its business and operations “may be materially and adversely affected by any negative impact on the cross-border supply chain industry resulting from the conflict in Ukraine, the Gaza Strip, or any other geopolitical tensions”.²⁴ The filing specifically cites “disruptions to supply chain and rising freight charges” as the primary risks.²⁴ This language is purely commercial and treats both conflicts as external economic shocks rather than moral or political imperatives.

Comparative conflict analysis: Ukraine vs. Gaza

The difference in market operations—Temu’s absence in Russia compared to its presence in Israel—could be interpreted through several lenses. While some might see the lack of Russian operations as an ethical stance, analysts suggest it is more likely due to a combination of sanctions risks, payment processing hurdles, and the fact that Temu is also absent from other major markets like India and South Africa for varying logistical and regulatory reasons.²⁵ The company’s continued operation in Israel aligns with its “Business-as-Usual” model, where it treats the country as a standard Western consumer market.¹

There is no evidence of Temu providing aid to one side of the Gaza conflict while ignoring the other. The company’s silence is consistent with its overall policy of avoiding all geopolitical engagement that does not directly impact its bottom line or its relationship with the Chinese and Western governments.¹⁰ This aligns with a “Generic Peace Statement” or “Strict Neutrality” stance, where the company avoids taking any political stance to prevent alienating its vast global customer base.¹⁰

Internal corporate policy and employee environment

The audit investigated reports of staff disciplinary actions regarding Palestine solidarity, such as the banning of badges or flags. The internal culture of PDD Holdings is known for being highly demanding and strictly monitored, with a focus on operational efficiency and data security.²⁷ However, there is no documented evidence of the company weaponizing its HR policies to specifically silence pro-Palestine dissent.²⁸

Online discussions have occasionally used the term “Temu gestapo” as a metaphorical critique of the company’s aggressive market tactics or internal oversight, but these do not refer to actual disciplinary actions related to the Israel-Palestine conflict.²⁸ Similarly, mentions of “temu flags” in public forums often relate to social media campaigns or patriotic displays unrelated to the company’s internal employee policy.²⁹

The company’s internal enforcement appears to prioritize commercial neutrality. There are no reports of PDD Holdings firing staff for pro-Palestine speech while permitting Zionist symbols, nor has the company taken legal action against unions for political expression regarding the Middle East.⁶ The primary focus of its HR and operational audits has been on “platform labour conditions” and “due diligence actions during domestic worker recruitment,” particularly in the context of avoiding forced labor allegations that could lead to Western import bans.⁶

Workplace monitoring and political expression

The lack of political mobilization of corporate assets during crises further supports the view that Temu does not function as an “Ideological Actor” for any state narrative in the Middle East.³⁰

Platform governance: Algorithmic bias and content moderation

As an e-commerce platform, Temu’s algorithms are designed to maximize consumer engagement and sales through personalized recommendations and “addictive” design features.²² Unlike social media platforms (such as those owned by ByteDance or Meta), Temu is not a primary source of public discourse or news distribution, which limits its capacity for “Narrative Control”.¹

However, the platform’s governance of its product listings is subject to regulatory oversight. The European Commission has opened a formal investigation into Temu under the Digital Services Act (DSA) over concerns that it fails to crack down on “noncompliant” or “illegal” products.²² This investigation focuses on product safety—such as toxic substances in toys and shoes—and the transparency of its “reward programs,” rather than the political origin of its goods.²¹

Regarding the occupation of Palestine, the “Systemic/Algorithmic Bias” audit examined whether the platform favors Israeli narratives or mislabels settlement goods. Due to its direct-from-China shipping model, Temu often bypasses the retail friction associated with settlement labeling laws that apply to physical stores in the EU.⁴ Most products on Temu are shipped directly from factories in China, meaning the platform does not typically stock or sell traditional Israeli agricultural or manufactured goods from the West Bank.⁴ While this model avoids the “mislabeling” of settlement goods to avoid consumer friction, it also creates a structural “Safe Harbor” from the ethical trade regulations that apply to traditional importers.⁷

Algorithmic and product audit data

The audit reveals that Temu’s “Narrative Control” is effectively non-existent in the political sense; the platform’s “editorial policy” is focused on price points and promotional mechanics.¹ There is no evidence that the company wields its power to sanitize state violence or delegitimize rights.¹⁰

Supply chain ethics and logistics in Israel

Temu’s presence in Israel is limited to the fulfillment of orders through global and local logistics partners. The company does not appear to maintain a permanent corporate office, distribution center, or warehouse within Israel or the occupied territories.²⁶

When a consumer in Israel places an order, the items are typically packaged in China-based warehouses and shipped via global freight partners such as DHL or UPS.⁵ Upon arrival in Israel, the parcels are handed off to local carriers for final-mile delivery.²³ These arrangements are standard commercial contracts and do not constitute an “Official Partnership” with the Israeli state or military for non-commercial reasons.¹⁰

The company’s supply chain has been criticized for potential human rights violations, but these are centered on the manufacturing sector in China rather than the Israeli defense or intelligence apparatus.²⁷ For example, the company has been linked to concerns over “forced Uyghur labour” and the presence of toxic substances in its products.¹ While these are severe ethical issues, they indicate a “complicity” with the manufacturing conditions in its home country rather than a “Political Project” related to Zionism.¹⁹

Logistics and market operation details

The audit finds no record of Temu partnering with Israeli state academic institutions like Technion or Hebrew University, nor has it accepted state honors such as the Jubilee Award.¹⁰

Institutional ESG standing and political risk outlook

The institutional perception of PDD Holdings as an investment reflects its status as a “Low-Mid” risk entity in terms of Middle Eastern political complicity, but a higher risk in terms of general corporate governance and labor rights.

The company’s ESG rating from MSCI has recently been downgraded to ‘CCC,’ the lowest possible “laggard” rating.³⁷ However, this downgrade was primarily due to its performance in “Labor Management,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Privacy & Data Security” rather than its political affiliations.³⁷ Institutional investors like the Surrey Pension Fund continue to hold the stock, viewing it as a high-growth “feature stock” while monitoring its ethical compliance in the Chinese market.³⁷

The company’s relationship with the global financial system is characterized by “Business-as-Usual” growth. It maintains its listing on the Nasdaq and is a major component of several global tech and e-commerce ETFs.⁹ This normalization of its status as a Western-traded multinational occurs despite the intense scrutiny of its Chinese origins, but there is no evidence that the company uses this influence to shape legislation in favor of the Israeli state.¹⁰

ESG and risk metrics summary

The audit reveals that while Temu is a highly controversial entity in terms of trade policy and labor ethics, it maintains a posture of “Strict Neutrality” or “Business-as-Usual” regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. The data suggests that the entity avoids all measurable political engagement in the region, prioritizing the protection of its bottom line and its global expansion strategy.¹

Summary of intelligence requirements and findings

The audit has documented and evidenced the following information regarding the core intelligence requirements for Temu and PDD Holdings:

1. Governance Ideology: The Board of Directors and executive leadership (Lei Chen, Jiazhen Zhao) have no documented memberships in Zionist advocacy groups like CFI or AIPAC. Independent Director George Yeo has a history of diplomatic criticism toward Israeli military force.
2. Lobbying & Trade: No membership in the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce was found. The company does not sponsor “Brand Israel” events or “Innovation Days.” Lobbying is defensive and focused on U.S.-China trade issues.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: The company treats both the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts as commercial risks in its SEC filings. It has issued no solidarity statements for either. It does not operate in Russia, but ships to Israel via standard commercial channels.
4. Internal Policy: There are no reports of staff being disciplined for Palestine solidarity badges or flags. The internal culture is high-pressure and monitoring-heavy, but this is used for operational efficiency rather than ideological suppression.
5. Platform & Supply Chain: Temu’s direct-to-consumer model from China largely bypasses local labeling requirements for settlement goods. There is no evidence of systemic algorithmic bias favoring Israeli narratives.

1. The Rise of Temu: A Chinese online shopping app in the US, accessed January 27, 2026, https://globalpolitics.in/view_cir_articles.php?url=Global%20Politics%20Explainer&recordNo=1340
2. Division of Investment – Proxy Vote – NJ.gov, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.nj.gov/treasury/doinvest/proxy/2023-int-q1.shtml
3. National Perspectives on Europe’s De-risking from China, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.ui.se/globalassets/ui.se-eng/publications/other-publications/etnc-2024_national-perspectives-on-europes-de-risking-from-china.pdf
4. US recipients – FARA eFile, accessed January 27, 2026, https://efile.fara.gov/docs/3457-Informational-Materials-20250119-638.pdf
5. Temu Shipping 2025: Fast, Free & Reliable Delivery Explained – DSers, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.dsers.com/blog/temu-shipping/
6. Strengthening labour institutions and worker voice to deliver decent employment, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-07/RDW_Package_2025_0107%20%28001%29.pdf
7. VLR Blog Archives – Page 4 of 10 – Vermont Law Review, accessed January 27, 2026, https://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/category/vermontlawreviewblog/page/4/
8. PDD Holdings Inc: Overview – GlobalData, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.globaldata.com/company-profile/pinduoduocom/
9. 2024 Annual Report to Congress – U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf
10. News Releases | PDD Holdings, accessed January 27, 2026, https://investor.pddholdings.com/news-releases/
11. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on May 21, 2025_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202505/t20250521_11630009.html
12. Which Company Owns Temu? | The Motley Fool, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.fool.com/investing/how-to-invest/stocks/who-owns-temu/
13. Board of Directors | PDD Holdings, accessed January 27, 2026, https://investor.pddholdings.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors/
14. Management – PDD Holdings | Investor Relations, accessed January 27, 2026, https://investor.pddholdings.com/corporate-governance/management/
15. 2023 12/31/23 – SEC.gov, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1737806/000110465924051610/pdd-20231231x20f.htm
16. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 20-F PDD Holdings Inc., accessed January 27, 2026, https://investor.pddholdings.com/static-files/e9586d93-bb1d-4e98-af8a-4e73b62350f2
17. Chairperson’s Statement of the 12th ASEAN Summit HE the President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, accessed January 27, 2026, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ASEAN-Documents-Series-2006.pdf
18. The Jewish Diasporascape in the Straits An Ethnographic Study of Jewish Businesses Across Borders – VU Research Portal, accessed January 27, 2026, https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/42191430/complete+dissertation.pdf
19. The richest people in the world Top 100 – E1 Holding, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.e1-holding.com/en/the-richest-people-in-the-world-top-100/
20. accessed January 1, 1970, https://www.ibbc.org.uk/
21. Temu – Wikipedia, accessed January 27, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temu
22. EU opens probe into Chinese e-commerce platform Temu – POLITICO Pro, accessed January 27, 2026, https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2024/10/eu-opens-probe-into-chinese-e-commerce-platform-temu-00186465
23. Temu Shipping Time Guide: How Long Does Temu Take to Ship – Toptrade Sourcing, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.toptradesourcing.com/temu-shipping-time-guide-blog/
24. Registration No. 333-[•] – SEC.gov, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2018836/000121390024070557/filename1.htm
25. TOWARDS A FUTURE FOR BRICS+, accessed January 27, 2026, https://openbookshongkong.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/9789888900831.pdf
26. Temu Shipping Countries | MegaBonus, accessed January 27, 2026, https://megabonus.com/en/blog/does-temu-ship-worldwide/
27. The truth behind Temu. : r/LinusTechTips – Reddit, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/LinusTechTips/comments/1btph0k/the_truth_behind_temu/
28. I Don’t Want to Sound Conspiratorial but; Does the Administration Want Riots to Justify Their Agenda? : r/andor – Reddit, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/andor/comments/1or32br/i_dont_want_to_sound_conspiratorial_but_does_the/
29. ‘Don’t call this racist’: row grows over motives behind England flag campaign – Reddit, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1mv5gcl/dont_call_this_racist_row_grows_over_motives/
30. increasing its – FARA eFile, accessed January 27, 2026, https://efile.fara.gov/docs/3457-Informational-Materials-20231201-336.pdf
31. The billion-dollar industry of Israeli illegal settlements – Daily Sabah, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.dailysabah.com/op-ed/2020/01/03/the-billion-dollar-industry-of-israeli-illegal-settlements
32. Articles written by AP Associated Press | Pág. 37 – El Pais in English – EL PAÍS, accessed January 27, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/author/ap-associated-press/36/
33. accessed January 1, 1970, https://www.temu.com/shipping-info.html
34. Temu has switch over to local delivery. This means that most of the listings say they ship out of a local USA warehouse. They found a way around the tariffs. Now let’s see AliExpress do this. Wait they already did. – Reddit, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress/comments/1kes6gz/temu_has_switch_over_to_local_delivery_this_means/
35. Temu Shipping Guide: What To Expect In 2025 – ShipBots, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.shipbots.com/post/temu-shipping-guide
36. Full Data – University of Glasgow, accessed January 27, 2026, https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_1138687_smxx.xlsx
37. (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Surrey Pension Fund Committee, 21/03/2025 11:00, accessed January 27, 2026, https://mycouncil.surreycc.gov.uk/documents/g9203/Public+reports+pack+Friday+21-Mar-2025+11.00+Surrey+Pension+Fund+Committee.pdf?T=10