TripAdvisor Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Overview

1.1 Audit Mandate and Strategic Context

This report constitutes a comprehensive governance audit of TripAdvisor, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRIP) and its controlling entity, Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc. (OTCMKTS: LTRPA), executed in response to a specific directive to assess the organization’s “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of surveillance or militarization.

The objective of this forensic examination is to document, evidence, and analyze the company’s leadership, ownership architecture, operational footprint, and crisis response mechanisms. The ultimate goal is to provide a granular intelligence dataset that allows a subsequent classification of TripAdvisor on a spectrum ranging from “Strict Neutrality” to “Upper-Extreme Political Project.”

In the contemporary geopolitical landscape, digital tourism platforms are no longer passive intermediaries. They function as critical infrastructure for “digital placemaking”—the process by which territories are mapped, named, and legitimized in the global consciousness. By aggregating reviews, processing bookings, and defining geographical hierarchies, companies like TripAdvisor possess the power to normalize disputed territories, sanitize conflict zones for consumption, and direct economic flows to specific political projects. This audit evaluates whether TripAdvisor exercises this power in a manner that aligns with international humanitarian law and corporate neutrality, or whether its operations exhibit a systemic bias that materially supports the occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

1.2 Core Intelligence Requirements (CIR) Status

The audit addresses the following intelligence requirements through a rigorous analysis of open-source intelligence (OSINT), corporate filings, NGO reports, and comparative behavioral analysis:

1. Governance Ideology: Screening of the Board of Directors and Executive Leadership for ideological affiliations.
2. Lobbying & Trade: Analysis of institutional entanglements with Israeli state trade bodies and “Brand Israel” initiatives.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: A comparative analysis of corporate responses to the Ukraine invasion versus the Gaza conflict.
4. Internal Policy: Investigation into the enforcement of neutrality policies regarding staff conduct and political expression.

1.3 Methodological Framework

This report adopts a “Governance and Human Rights Due Diligence” framework, referencing the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) as the baseline for corporate responsibility in conflict-affected areas. The analysis distinguishes between “passive presence” (incidental listings) and “active complicity” (strategic partnerships, lobbying, and differential application of policy).

2. Governance Ideology and Ownership Architecture

The ideological orientation of a corporation is often a reflection of its controlling interests. For TripAdvisor, the governance structure is unique due to the controlling stake held by Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, creating a concentrated power dynamic that insulates leadership from typical shareholder pressures.

2.1 The Liberty Media Nexus: Structural Control

TripAdvisor is controlled by Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc., which holds a majority of the voting power despite holding a smaller economic interest. This places ultimate governance authority within the sphere of the “Liberty media ecosystem,” a conglomerate historically characterized by aggressive consolidation and a specific corporate ethos.

2.1.1 Gregory B. Maffei: The Controlling Architect

Gregory B. Maffei serves as the Chairman of the Board for TripAdvisor and was, until late 2024, the President and CEO of Liberty Media Corporation.¹ His role is pivotal; he acts as the primary conduit between the Liberty investment thesis and TripAdvisor’s strategic direction.

• Corporate Profile: Maffei oversees a vast portfolio including Live Nation, SiriusXM, and Formula 1.³ His leadership style is described as financially aggressive and technocratic.
• Ideological Indicators: A comprehensive screening of Maffei’s public affiliations does not reveal overt membership in explicit Zionist advocacy groups such as the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) or the Jewish National Fund (JNF). However, his corporate network is deeply embedded in the US establishment media and telecommunications sectors, which traditionally maintain strong institutional alignment with US foreign policy favoring Israel. The absence of “activist” Zionism does not preclude “structural” support; Maffei’s governance track record prioritizes shareholder value and regulatory compliance with US law—which creates a permissive environment for business in settlements—over adherence to international human rights standards that might restrict revenue.
• Insulation from Activism: The Liberty governance structure effectively shields TripAdvisor from the type of activist shareholder resolutions that have pressured other companies to divest from conflict zones. Because Maffei and Liberty control the voting stock, external pressure campaigns regarding human rights in Palestine have no mechanical lever to force board-level change, allowing the status quo to persist indefinitely.⁴

2.1.2 Executive Leadership Profiles

Stephen Kaufer (Co-Founder & Former CEO):

Stephen Kaufer, who led the company for over two decades until 2022, established the foundational policies regarding settlement listings.

• Affinity for Israel: In a 2015 interview with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Kaufer expressed a personal affinity for Israel, describing Jerusalem as his “favorite destination” and “magical”.⁵ While expressing a fondness for a travel destination is not inherently political, the context of Jerusalem—specifically East Jerusalem, which is occupied territory under international law—renders this preference geopolitically significant.
• Policy Formulation: It was under Kaufer’s tenure that TripAdvisor firmly rejected requests from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to de-list settlement properties. His administration codified the defense that “listing is not endorsement,” a position that effectively normalized the presence of settlement businesses on the platform.⁶ This suggests a governance ideology that views the occupation as a “non-issue” for business operations, prioritizing the completeness of the platform’s catalog over the legal status of the land.

Matt Goldberg (Current CEO):

Appointed in July 2022, Matt Goldberg succeeded Kaufer.

• Professional Background: Goldberg’s background includes leadership roles at News Corp, Lonely Planet, and Liberty Interactive.⁷ His tenure at News Corp places him within a media environment known for its editorial support of Israel, though Goldberg’s specific role was operational.
• Continuity of Policy: Since assuming the CEO role, there has been no observed deviation from the settlement listing policy. The “business as usual” approach during the 2023-2024 Gaza conflict indicates that the ideological stance of the company is institutionalized and not merely the product of the founder’s personal views.

2.2 Board of Directors Composition and Affiliations

The Board of Directors is composed largely of technology, media, and finance executives. A detailed screening for membership in Zionist advocacy groups (AIPAC, CFI, etc.) yields the following profile:

Governance Analysis:

The Board lacks any representation from human rights experts or individuals with a background in international humanitarian law (IHL). This “governance gap” is critical. Without a voice on the board to articulate the reputational and legal risks of complicity in war crimes (as defined by the Fourth Geneva Convention regarding settlements), the Board defaults to a standard US corporate risk model. In this model, unless the US government sanctions a territory (like Russia/Crimea), commerce is permitted. The ideological footprint here is one of “Passive Acquiescence”—a refusal to take a moral stance on the occupation, which functionally supports the occupier by treating the illegal situation as normal commerce.

3. Operational Complicity: The Settlement Economy

The most tangible evidence of political complicity lies in TripAdvisor’s operational integration with the economy of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). International law, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention, prohibits an occupying power from transferring its civilian population into the territory it occupies. The establishment and maintenance of these settlements are widely regarded as war crimes.

3.1 The Scale of Entanglement

Intelligence gathered by Amnesty International and the UN Human Rights Council indicates that TripAdvisor is a primary digital enabler of the settlement tourism economy.

• Volume of Listings: The platform hosts over 70 properties, activities, and attractions located in at least 27 illegal settlements.¹¹ This volume places TripAdvisor among the top digital enablers of settlement tourism, second only to Airbnb (which has vacillated on the issue) and Booking.com.
• Geographic Spread: The listings are not limited to the major settlement blocs near the Green Line but extend deep into the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including:
  • Ariel: A major settlement city in the central West Bank.
  • Kfar Adumim: Located east of Jerusalem.
  • Gush Etzion: A cluster of settlements south of Jerusalem.
  • Susya: A controversial settlement in the South Hebron Hills.
  • East Jerusalem: Numerous listings in settlement neighborhoods surrounding the Old City.¹²

3.2 The Mechanism of Normalization

TripAdvisor’s platform features do not merely list these properties; they actively normalize them through “Digital Placemaking.” This process obscures the reality of military occupation and repackages it as a benign leisure experience.

3.2.1 Mislabeling and Erasure

A critical component of this complicity is the labeling of location.

• “Israel” vs. “Palestinian Territories”: TripAdvisor frequently lists settlement properties as being located in “Israel” rather than the “West Bank” or “Palestinian Territories.” For example, the ancient ruins in Susya (managed by settlers on Palestinian land) are listed as an Israeli tourist attraction.¹³ This algorithmic erasure of the Green Line validates the Israeli state’s annexationist narratives.
• Consumer Deception: By failing to label these locations as “Illegal Settlements” or “Occupied Territory,” TripAdvisor denies consumers the ability to make informed ethical decisions. A tourist booking a “Jeep Tour” in Gush Etzion may be unaware they are touring on confiscated land, guarded by military infrastructure.¹²

3.2.2 Case Study: Susya

The listing of the archaeological site at Susya is particularly egregious.

• Context: The Palestinian village of Khirbet Susiya faces imminent demolition orders and systematic violence from nearby settlers. The villagers are restricted from accessing their own water cisterns and agricultural land.¹³
• TripAdvisor’s Role: Simultaneously, TripAdvisor promotes a winery and the archaeological park in the adjacent settlement of Susya. The platform invites tourists to visit the settlement site—which consumes resources denied to the Palestinian neighbors—without any mention of the human rights violations occurring meters away.¹⁴ This is a direct monetization of the disparity created by the occupation.

3.2.3 Activity Normalization

The types of activities promoted further militarize the tourism experience.

• “Shoot Like a Soldier”: Listings in Gush Etzion include shooting ranges where tourists can “learn to shoot like a soldier,” effectively gamifying the militarized environment of the occupation.¹¹
• Wineries and Agriculture: Promotion of settlement wineries validates the exploitation of Palestinian natural resources (land and water), which is a violation of the laws of occupation.¹²

3.3 The “EatWith” Acquisition: Settler Hospitality

In 2016, TripAdvisor led an investment round in EatWith, a “social dining” platform co-founded in Tel Aviv.¹⁵

• Strategic Integration: TripAdvisor integrated EatWith experiences directly into its restaurant pages.
• Implication: While EatWith operates globally, its strong Israeli roots and the nature of “home hospitality” create a vector for settlers to host international tourists in their homes in the West Bank. This bypasses the traditional hotel infrastructure and creates intimate, humanizing encounters between tourists and settlers, reinforcing the narrative of settler legitimacy while the indigenous Palestinian population remains invisible or inaccessible due to checkpoints and movement restrictions.

3.4 United Nations Human Rights Council Database (The “Blacklist”)

In February 2020, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) released a database of business enterprises involved in activities that support the existence and maintenance of settlements.¹¹

• Designation: TripAdvisor was explicitly named in this database.
• Significance: This is not an NGO allegation but a formal recognition by the premier international human rights body that TripAdvisor’s commercial activities contribute to the violation of human rights in the OPT. The specific grounds for inclusion relate to the “provision of services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements.” This listing officially categorizes TripAdvisor as an entity materially supporting the settlement enterprise.

4. Strategic Partnerships and “Brand Israel”

Beyond the passive listing of properties, the audit investigates whether TripAdvisor engages in active partnerships with Israeli state institutions, thereby participating in the “Brand Israel” campaign—a state-led initiative to improve Israel’s global image by emphasizing technology, lifestyle, and tourism while downplaying the conflict.

4.1 “Tel Aviv Global” and Smart Tourism

TripAdvisor has established partnerships with Tel Aviv Global, a municipal corporation dedicated to positioning Tel Aviv as a global city.¹⁸

• The Partnership: TripAdvisor data and platforms are used to benchmark Tel Aviv’s tourism success. The platform has been involved in initiatives like the “Mayor’s Smart Tourism Award”.¹⁹
• Ideological Function: Promoting Tel Aviv is central to the “Brand Israel” strategy. By focusing on Tel Aviv’s liberal, tech-savvy, and LGBTQ+-friendly reputation (often criticized as “Pinkwashing”), the state diverts attention from the military occupation in the West Bank.²⁰ TripAdvisor’s active collaboration in boosting this specific brand narrative—while simultaneously profiting from the occupation just an hour’s drive away—demonstrates a willingness to serve the state’s soft power objectives.

4.2 Sponsorship of IMTM (International Mediterranean Tourism Market)

Evidence points to TripAdvisor’s involvement with the IMTM, Israel’s flagship annual tourism exhibition held in Tel Aviv.²¹

• State Alignment: IMTM is heavily supported by the Israeli Ministry of Tourism. Sponsorship or active participation in this event signals a normalized business relationship with the state apparatus. It provides a platform where settlement regional councils often have booths promoting tourism in “Judea and Samaria” (the West Bank) alongside legitimate destinations. By participating, TripAdvisor legitimizes the entire ecosystem of Israeli tourism, which the state treats as inclusive of the settlements.

4.3 Corporate Presence and Innovation

TripAdvisor executives, including the CFO and CEO, regularly participate in global technology conferences where the synergy with Israeli “Start-Up Nation” technology is highlighted.²² The acquisition of EatWith and the utilization of Israeli tech in the travel stack creates a dependency on the Israeli tech ecosystem, which is often deeply intertwined with the Israeli military’s Unit 8200 and the surveillance technology sector. This structural reliance creates a disincentive for the company to take any political stance that might alienate Israeli partners.

5. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Comparative Crisis Response

A critical methodology in political risk auditing is the “Safe Harbor” test: analyzing a company’s behavior across different geopolitical crises to detect inconsistencies that reveal underlying bias. The contrast between TripAdvisor’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) and its ongoing response to the occupation of Palestine and the Gaza conflict (2023-2024) provides the most definitive evidence of political alignment.

5.1 Response to the Ukraine Invasion (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, TripAdvisor executed a strategy that can be described as a “Clean Break.” The response was rapid, moralistic, and commercially punitive.

• Commercial Suspension: The company suspended the ability to write reviews for listings in Russia and Belarus to prevent misinformation, and more importantly, cancelled all bookings for travel to Russia and Belarus via its transactional subsidiaries (Viator, Flipkey).²³
• Strategic De-platforming: TripAdvisor stopped promoting travel to the region entirely. The stated reason was to “show solidarity with Ukraine”.²⁴
• Humanitarian Mobilization: The TripAdvisor Foundation matched donations up to $250,000 for World Central Kitchen to assist Ukrainian refugees.²³
• Moral Language: Public statements explicitly condemned the “actions of Russia” and framed the corporate response as a moral imperative to stand against aggression.

Analysis: In the Ukraine case, TripAdvisor abandoned its “neutral platform” status. It decided that the violation of international law (invasion and occupation) was severe enough to warrant a cessation of business, even if it meant a loss of revenue and alienating Russian users.

5.2 Response to Gaza and the West Bank (2023-2024)

In stark contrast, the company’s response to the decades-long occupation of the West Bank and the acute devastation in Gaza (2023-2024) has been characterized by “Business as Usual.”

• Operational Continuity: TripAdvisor has never suspended bookings for listings in illegal Israeli settlements. Despite the UN declaring these settlements a war crime, and despite the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings on the illegality of the occupation, commercial operations continue unabated.¹¹
• The “Neutrality” Defense: When pressed by Amnesty International to remove settlement listings, TripAdvisor responded that “the listing of a property or business on TripAdvisor does not represent our endorsement of that establishment”.⁶ This defense was notably absent when they de-platformed Russian businesses.
• Crisis Management in Gaza: During the height of the bombardment of Gaza in late 2023, TripAdvisor’s algorithms continued to run standard ads. In one instance, the platform served an ad encouraging users to “Book a stay” at the Al Mathaf Hotel in Gaza City, which was in a war zone. The company issued an apology for the “insensitivity” of the ad but did not fundamentally alter its engagement with the region.²⁶
• Travel Alerts vs. Boycotts: While TripAdvisor issued travel safety alerts for Israel and the Palestinian Territories (a standard duty-of-care measure), it did not issue any statement of solidarity with Palestinian civilians or take steps to limit tourism to Israel as a form of pressure, unlike the boycott of Russian tourism.

5.3 Comparative Policy Matrix

Audit Insight: The discrepancy reveals that TripAdvisor’s “Safe Harbor” is selective. The company aligns its ethical compass not with universal human rights laws (which condemn both Russian aggression and Israeli settlements), but with US foreign policy. Where the US government leads (sanctions on Russia), TripAdvisor follows. Where the US government is permissive (support for Israel), TripAdvisor remains “neutral,” effectively profiting from the status quo.

6. Internal Governance, Corporate Culture, and Staff Policing

6.1 The Code of Business Conduct

TripAdvisor’s internal Code of Business Conduct mandates a “Commitment to Human and Workplace Rights”.²⁷ However, the application of this code appears truncated when applied to the Palestinian context.

• Legal Compliance: The code requires compliance with “applicable laws.” TripAdvisor interprets this as US domestic law. Since the US does not criminalize business with settlements (and in some states penalizes boycotts), the company asserts it is compliant. This ignores the “soft law” of the UNGPs which calls for businesses to respect internationally recognized human rights even when national laws do not require it.

6.2 Staff Disciplinary Actions and Culture

The audit investigated potential suppression of internal dissent regarding the company’s stance on Palestine.

• Amnesty’s Direct Appeal: In a rare move, Amnesty International bypassed the executive leadership and addressed an open letter directly to TripAdvisor staff, urging them to “use their power” to demand the company stop profiting from war crimes.²⁸ This tactic suggests that external auditors perceive a disconnect between the staff’s potential ethical values and the board’s policy.
• Precedents for Termination: While specific reports of mass firings at TripAdvisor for Palestine activism are not currently public (unlike the “Project Nimbus” protests at Google and Amazon ²⁹), TripAdvisor has a documented history of strict disciplinary action for conduct deemed “inimical” to the company’s interest. A precedent exists where an employee was fired for a “spat” with a reviewer, with the courts upholding the firing as misconduct.³¹ This strict enforcement of “brand protection” creates a chilling effect, deterring employees from organizing or wearing symbols of solidarity (e.g., Palestine badges) for fear of termination under “misconduct” clauses.
• Industry Context: TripAdvisor operates within the broader US tech ecosystem where there has been a coordinated crackdown on pro-Palestine activism (e.g., Google firing 28 employees for sit-ins). Given the shared investor base and corporate culture, it is highly probable that TripAdvisor maintains a similar, if quieter, zero-tolerance policy for internal disruption related to this issue.

6.3 The “Neutrality” Trap

The company enforces a doctrine of “neutrality” internally. However, as the audit of the Ukraine response demonstrates, this neutrality is fluid. Employees likely perceive that advocating for Ukraine is “company policy,” while advocating for Palestine is “political activity” and thus a violation of workplace norms. This differential enforcement creates a discriminatory environment that marginalizes employees with Palestinian heritage or solidarity.

7. Lobbying, Legislation, and the Regulatory Shield

TripAdvisor’s complicity is also reinforced by its interaction with the US legislative environment, which actively protects companies trading with Israeli settlements.

7.1 Lobbying Activities

TripAdvisor is an active lobbyist in Washington, D.C., with expenditures focused on protecting its platform immunity.

• Section 230: A primary lobbying focus is the preservation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.³² This law provides the legal shield that allows TripAdvisor to host reviews of illegal settlement properties without being held liable for facilitating trespass or promoting criminal activity (under international law).
• Regulatory Focus: The company’s lobbying efforts are largely technocratic (ticket transparency, junk fees). There is no evidence of TripAdvisor lobbying against anti-BDS laws, despite these laws potentially infringing on the company’s First Amendment rights if it ever chose to boycott settlements.

7.2 The Anti-BDS Constraint

The US regulatory environment acts as a “Regulatory Shield” for TripAdvisor’s current policy.

• State Legislation: Over 35 US states have passed anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) legislation.³⁴ These laws penalize companies that boycott Israel or territories controlled by Israel (the West Bank).
• Strategic Acquiescence: If TripAdvisor were to de-list West Bank settlements (as Airbnb attempted in 2018 before reversing), it would face immediate divestment from state pension funds (e.g., Florida, Texas) and potential contract exclusions. TripAdvisor has chosen strategic acquiescence: complying with these state laws to protect its US revenue base, rather than adhering to international human rights standards. This choice prioritizes US market access over global human rights compliance, embedding the company within the state-level protectionist framework designed to shield the settlement enterprise.

8. Summary of Indicators

The following matrix summarizes the key intelligence findings. This data should be used to determine the final ranking of TripAdvisor on the “Political Complicity” scale.

8.1 Final Intelligence Assessment

The audit reveals that TripAdvisor is functionally integrated into the economy of the Israeli occupation. While the Board may not exhibit overt ideological zealotry in the form of membership in radical Zionist groups, their corporate behavior exhibits a “High-Level Structural Complicity.”

The company actively monetizes war crimes (as defined by the UN and Amnesty International), utilizes its algorithmic power to normalize the geography of occupation, and applies a distinct double standard in its crisis response policies. By providing a “Safe Harbor” for settlement tourism while simultaneously boycotting Russian tourism, TripAdvisor effectively signals that the occupation of Palestine is a tolerable, normalized, and legitimate business environment.

This report provides the necessary evidentiary basis to rank TripAdvisor significantly away from “Strict Neutrality” and towards the “Political Project” end of the spectrum, specifically as a “Normalizing Agent” of the status quo.

1. Gregory Maffei | Board of Directors | Tripadvisor – Investor Relations, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/board-directors/gregory-maffei
2. Greg Maffei – Wikipedia, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Maffei
3. Media, Sports, and Entertainment with Greg Maffei, President and CEO of Liberty Media Corporation – YouTube, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkeuQiQApGk
4. Tripadvisor and Liberty TripAdvisor Announce Planned Merger – PR Newswire, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tripadvisor-and-liberty-tripadvisor-announce-planned-merger-302335793.html
5. TripAdvisor CEO: A tech exec with a soft spot for Israel | AZ Jewish Post, accessed January 30, 2026, https://azjewishpost.com/2015/tripadvisor-ceo-a-tech-exec-with-a-soft-spot-for-israel/
6. TripAdvisor’s corporate irresponsibility | Opinions – Al Jazeera, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/7/28/tripadvisors-corporate-irresponsibility
7. Tripadvisor Appoints Matt Goldberg to Chief Executive Officer – PR Newswire, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tripadvisor-appoints-matt-goldberg-to-chief-executive-officer-301540076.html
8. Jeremy Philips | Board of Directors – Tripadvisor, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/board-directors/jeremy-philips
9. Robert Wiesenthal | Board of Directors – Tripadvisor, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/board-directors/robert-wiesenthal
10. Betsy L. Morgan and Trynka Shineman Blake Join TripAdvisor’s Board of Directors, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/betsy-l-morgan-and-trynka-shineman-blake-join-tripadvisors-board-of-directors-300811350.html
11. TripAdvisor: Profiting from stolen land – Amnesty International UK, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/tripadvisor-profiting-stolen-land
12. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Tripadvisor, Inc. – Who Profits, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3767?trip-advisor
13. Israel/OPT: Why TripAdvisor continues to contribute to the suffering of Palestinians?, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/07/israelopt-why-tripadvisor-continues-to-contribute-to-the-suffering-of-palestinians/
14. UN exposes companies involved in Israeli settlements – and why it matters, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/un-exposes-companies-involved-israeli-settlements-and-why-it-matters
15. TripAdvisor invests in Israeli social dining co EatWith – Globes, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-tripadvisor-invests-in-israeli-social-dining-co-eatwith-1001159037
16. EatWith Raises New Round of Investment Funding From TripAdvisor, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/news-releases/news-release-details/eatwith-raises-new-round-investment-funding-tripadvisor
17. UN publishes list of companies with ties to Israeli settlements | West Bank | The Guardian, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/weather/2020/feb/12/un-publishes-list-of-companies-with-ties-to-israeli-settlements
18. THE GLOBAL IDENTITY OF CITIES – Brookings Institution, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/20200729_BrookingsMetro_GlobalIdentities_Final_Title.pdf
19. Study of the design and execution of an open innovation contest on visualization designs in the tourism industry – BFUF, accessed January 30, 2026, https://bfuf.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Paper-3_Study-of-the-design-and-execution-of-an-open-innovation-contest-on-visualization-designs-in-the-tourism-industry.pdf
20. Do No Harm! Palestinian Call for Ethical Tourism/Pilgrimage – BDS Movement, accessed January 30, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/pacbi/ethical-tourism
21. Sponsorship Opportunities | IMTM Tel Aviv Tourism Expo, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.imtm-telaviv.com/sponsorship
22. Tripadvisor Announces Participation at Upcoming Conferences, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/news-releases/news-release-details/tripadvisor-announces-participation-upcoming-conferences-5
23. #LeaveRussia: TripAdvisor is Exiting the Russian Market, accessed January 30, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/tripadvisor
24. Tripadvisor blocks some Russian reviews as customers use it to protest war, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/tripadvisor-blocks-russia-reviews-war-protest-b2030028.html
25. Israel/OPT: TripAdvisor must check out of illegal settlements amid flagrant human rights violations – Amnesty International, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/israel-opt-tripadvisor-must-check-out-of-illegal-settlements/
26. Tripadvisor apologises for Gaza hotel ad: What makes for a solid apology and recovery? – Marketing-Interactive, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.marketing-interactive.com/Tripadvisor-apologises-Gaza-hotel-ad
27. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics – Investor Relations, accessed January 30, 2026, https://ir.tripadvisor.com/static-files/c9552116-2cb5-4931-a831-49ff788da7ca
28. TripAdvisor staff urged to speak out against firm’s role in sustaining illegal Israeli settlements, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/07/tripadvisor-staff-urged-to-speak-out-against-firms-role-in-sustaining-illegal-israeli-settlements/
29. Google sacks 28 employees involved in protest against Israeli ties | Daily Sabah, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.dailysabah.com/world/mid-east/google-sacks-28-employees-involved-in-protest-against-israeli-ties
30. Ex-Google workers say firings for protesting Israel contract were illegal | RNZ News, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/515623/ex-google-workers-say-firings-for-protesting-israel-contract-were-illegal
31. Employee ‘tripped up’ by TripAdvisor spat – Dinse, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.dinse.com/employment-employee-benefits/employee-tripped-tripadvisor-spat/
32. Lobbying Update: $90,000 of TRIPADVISOR LLC lobbying was just disclosed, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Lobbying+Update%3A+%2490%2C000+of+TRIPADVISOR+LLC+lobbying+was+just+disclosed
33. tripadvisor llc – LD-2 Disclosure Form – Senate.gov, accessed January 30, 2026, https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/cf2d8107-9a46-4692-abf5-958fe7b588c6/print/
34. Wielding Antidiscrimination Law to Suppress the Movement for Palestinian Rights, accessed January 30, 2026, https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-133/wielding-antidiscrimination-law-to-suppress-the-movement-for-palestinian-rights/
35. WIELDING ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW TO SUPPRESS THE MOVEMENT FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS – Harvard Law Review, accessed January 30, 2026, https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1360-1381_Online-1.pdf