logo

Contents

Uniqlo Political Audit

  • Last Updated: February 26, 2026

Executive Strategic Overview

This extensive research report presents a forensic audit of Fast Retailing Co., Ltd., focusing on its flagship brand Uniqlo, to adjudicate its “Political Complicity” regarding the ongoing Israel-Palestine crisis. The analysis is situated at the intersection of corporate governance, global supply chain logistics, technological integration, and geopolitical crisis management. In an era where Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks are increasingly scrutinized for consistency, Uniqlo’s disparate responses to global conflicts—specifically the Russo-Ukrainian War versus the bombardment of Gaza—reveal a complex ideological footprint defined by “commercial pacifism” and strategic ambiguity.

The audit operates under a rigorous definition of “complicity” utilized by the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement and international human rights monitors, which categorizes involvement into direct operational complicity, supply chain entanglement, and ideological normalization. While Fast Retailing maintains no direct retail presence in Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), this report uncovers deep-seated “upstream complicity” through the integration of Israeli-developed surveillance and retail technologies, alongside a governance structure that prioritizes alignment with Western geopolitical interests over universal human rights consistency. Simultaneously, the corporation serves as a critical, albeit politically silent, financial pillar for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), creating a paradoxical operational profile that defies simple categorization.

The following analysis synthesizes evidence from corporate filings, board composition data, supply chain disclosures, technological procurement records, and comparative rhetorical analysis of crisis communications to provide a definitive assessment of Uniqlo’s political footprint.

1. Corporate Governance and Ideological Architecture

To understand Fast Retailing’s external geopolitical maneuvering, one must first deconstruct the internal ideological architecture that governs the corporation. The company is not merely a retailer; it is the manifestation of a specific management philosophy driven by its founder, Tadashi Yanai. This philosophy, known as “Global One,” fundamentally shapes how the entity perceives borders, conflict, and responsibility.

1.1 The Yanai Doctrine: Commercial Pacifism and the “Global One” Construct

At the apex of Fast Retailing’s governance structure sits Tadashi Yanai, the Chairman, President, and CEO.1 Yanai’s influence is monolithic, and his worldview dictates the company’s geopolitical posture. The “Global One” ideology posits that the world is a single, borderless market where commercial efficiency should transcend political divisions. This is not merely a business strategy but an ideological stance that views the nation-state as a secondary actor to the multinational corporation.

Yanai has historically positioned himself as a critic of the Japanese political establishment, frequently castigating bureaucrats and politicians for their “arrogance” and lack of economic acumen.2 This anti-establishment rhetoric, however, masks a deeply pragmatic alignment with the prevailing neoliberal order led by the United States and the G7. Yanai’s philosophy can be described as “Commercial Pacifism”—the belief that the integration of markets and the provision of “LifeWear” (clothing as a necessity) contributes to global stability more effectively than political intervention.

However, this doctrine faces critical stress tests when commercial interests collide with severe human rights violations. Yanai’s famous refusal to comment on the usage of Xinjiang cotton, stating the issue was “too political” 3, serves as the foundational precedent for Uniqlo’s approach to Palestine. The “Yanai Doctrine” prioritizes the preservation of the supply chain and market access over moral adjudication, leading to a stance of aggressive neutrality. In the context of Israel/Palestine, this neutrality manifests as a refusal to engage with the political reality of occupation, reframing the conflict purely as a humanitarian logistics challenge suitable for corporate charity rather than political sanction.

1.2 Board Composition and the Geopolitical Vacuum

An analysis of the Board of Directors reveals a significant “geopolitical vacuum.” The board is heavily weighted toward financial expertise, operational efficiency, and Western-aligned corporate governance, with a notable absence of diplomatic expertise or representation from the Global South.

Director Name Role Background & Geopolitical Implication
Tadashi Yanai Chairman, President & CEO Founder; centralizes decision-making; prioritizes “Global One” expansion and economic pragmatism over political risk taking. 1
Kathy Matsui External Director Former Chief Japan Equity Strategist at Goldman Sachs; pioneer of “Womenomics.” Her presence aligns the board with US financial standards and Western ESG norms, which traditionally view Israel as a strategic ally and market rather than a human rights pariah. 1
Masaaki Shintaku External Director Corporate management background; focus is on operational efficiency and supply chain fluidity, reinforcing a technocratic view of global markets. 1
Nobumichi Hattori External Director Expertise in M&A and finance; background supports the acquisition of global technologies (including Israeli tech) to drive growth. 6
Toru Hambayashi External Director (Former) Historic presence indicates continuity of the “Japan Inc.” traditional conservative business approach. 7

Analysis of Board Blind Spots: The composition of the board 1 suggests a governance structure designed to navigate capital markets rather than geopolitical crises. The presence of Kathy Matsui, a figure deeply integrated into the US-Japan financial nexus 5, reinforces an orientation toward American foreign policy norms. There is no evidence of directors with expertise in Middle Eastern affairs, international humanitarian law, or asymmetric conflict.

This structural homogeneity creates a “Western bias” in risk assessment. For this board, the “risk” regarding Israel is defined by potential alienation of the US market or disruption of technological supply chains, rather than the reputational risk associated with the BDS movement or complicity in international law violations. This contrasts with their assessment of the Russia-Ukraine war, where the geopolitical consensus of their primary markets (Japan, EU, US) was unified, allowing the board to act decisively without internal friction.

1.3 The “Zen” of Corporate Neutrality: Internal Policies on Dissent

Fast Retailing’s internal governance documents codify a strict separation between professional duty and political conscience, effectively insulating the corporation from employee-led activism that has plagued other tech and retail giants.

The Code of Conduct (CoC) Mechanisms: The Code of Conduct explicitly regulates political engagement. Section 12.3.1 states: “When we participate in activities based on our political or other ideas, we shall do so only as individuals outside of working hours and outside the company’s premises”.9 While standard for multinational corporations, in the polarized context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, this policy functions as a suppression mechanism.

  • Suppression of Internal Activism: unlike Starbucks, where the “Workers United” union posted pro-Palestine messages leading to a federal lawsuit and brand crisis 10, Uniqlo’s strict policy precludes such collective expression. The corporate structure, heavily reliant on non-unionized or compliant labor in its retail sector, utilizes this clause to maintain a facade of total unanimity.
  • Donations Policy: Article 3.7 of the CoC prohibits “inappropriate” donations to political organizations.11 This prevents the company from donating to PACs (like AIPAC in the US), distinguishing it from many American corporations. However, it also precludes support for Palestinian advocacy groups that are categorized as “political” rather than “humanitarian,” reinforcing the company’s preference for safe, depoliticized partners like UNRWA and UNHCR.

The “Global One” ideology, therefore, is not truly neutral. It is a construct that actively filters out political friction to ensure the smooth flow of capital and commodities. By defining the Israel-Palestine conflict as “political” (and thus off-limits) while defining the Ukraine invasion as “humanitarian/existential” (and thus actionable), the governance structure reveals a bias toward the geopolitical status quo enforced by its primary security guarantor, the United States.

2. Technological Complicity: The Israeli Innovation Ecosystem

While Uniqlo avoids the visible complicity of operating stores in illegal Israeli settlements, the audit reveals a significant and largely invisible layer of “Technological Complicity.” Fast Retailing has actively integrated its supply chain and customer experience infrastructure with the Israeli “Startup Nation” ecosystem. This sector is deeply intertwined with the Israeli defense establishment, where technologies developed for military surveillance and signals intelligence are adapted for commercial retail applications.

2.1 The Zeekit Acquisition and the Militarization of Retail

One of the most direct links between Uniqlo and the Israeli tech sector is the engagement with Zeekit, a Tel Aviv-based computer vision company.

  • Origins and Dual-Use Nature: Zeekit was founded by Yael Vizel, a former Captain in the Israeli Air Force (IAF).12 The technology underpinning Zeekit—layered augmented reality and topographic mapping of the human body—was directly adapted from military mapping technologies used for terrain analysis and mission planning.
  • Uniqlo’s Engagement: Prior to Zeekit’s acquisition by Walmart in 2021, Uniqlo was identified as a key client and partner. Industry reports from 2016 and 2018 explicitly list Uniqlo alongside other major retailers as utilizing Zeekit’s virtual fitting room technology.13
  • Strategic Implication: By integrating Zeekit, Uniqlo did not merely buy software; it participated in the validation and monetization of Israeli military-grade technology. The capital flows from such contracts help sustain the Israeli tech ecosystem, which the state utilizes as a strategic asset to counter diplomatic isolation (a strategy known as “innovation diplomacy”). Uniqlo executives visited Israel in 2018 specifically to scout such technologies at the Re:Tech hub 14, demonstrating proactive intent to extract value from this ecosystem.

2.2 RFID and the Checkpoint Systems Nexus

Uniqlo is renowned for its operational efficiency, driven largely by its adoption of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology. This system allows for the famous “instant checkout” bins where customers drop clothes and are tallied automatically.

  • The Technology Provider: The RFID ecosystem is dominated by a few key players. Checkpoint Systems is a primary global supplier of RFID and Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) solutions for the apparel industry.15
  • The Israeli Connection: Checkpoint Systems, while a global entity, has deep R&D roots in Israel. The company has historically acquired Israeli startups to bolster its RFID chip and sensor capabilities (e.g., the acquisition of Meto and partnerships with Israeli chip designers).17 Snippets indicate that Checkpoint Systems maintains personnel and potentially R&D functions linked to Israel, as evidenced by L1 visa petitions for specialized staff transfers.18
  • Complicity Analysis: If Uniqlo’s RFID implementation—the backbone of its “LifeWear” efficiency model—relies on intellectual property or hardware components developed in Checkpoint’s Israeli labs, the company is systematically reliant on the Israeli economy. This creates a dependency where Uniqlo’s operational success is tethered to the stability and innovation output of a state accused of apartheid, violating the BDS guideline of ending ties with complicit corporations.

2.3 The “MySize” Ambiguity and Digital Profiling

Uniqlo’s mobile application features a “MySize Camera” and “MySize Assist” function.19 This naming convention strongly correlates with My Size Inc. (MySizeID), an Israeli technology firm based in Airport City, Israel.21

  • Forensic Link: MySizeID utilizes smartphone sensors and algorithms to estimate body measurements—a function mirroring Uniqlo’s “MySize Camera.” While Uniqlo has internally branded the feature “MySize Assist,” the technological underpinnings bear striking resemblance to the white-label solutions offered by My Size Inc.
  • Sizer Connection: Furthermore, reports link Uniqlo to Sizer, another Israeli body-measuring app developer.13 Sizer’s technology uses computer vision to scan the user’s body.
  • Implication: Whether through MySizeID or Sizer, the evidence suggests Uniqlo has contracted with Israeli firms to harvest biometric data from its customers to optimize sizing. This represents a transfer of consumer data and corporate revenue to Israeli tech firms, reinforcing the economic normalization of the state.

2.4 Innovation Delegations: The Mechanism of Normalization

Fast Retailing does not passively purchase these technologies; it actively seeks them out.

  • Delegation Diplomacy: Uniqlo executives participated in the 2018 delegation to Israel organized by Re:Tech.14 Such delegations are political acts of normalization. They signal to the global market that Israel is a legitimate, thriving innovation hub, effectively “tech-washing” the political reality of the occupation.
  • Japan Israel Innovation Network (JIIN): Fast Retailing operates within the sphere of the JIIN, a government-backed initiative to funnel Japanese capital into Israeli tech.23 By participating in this ecosystem, Uniqlo aligns itself with the Japanese government’s policy of deepening economic ties with Israel, irrespective of the political situation in Gaza or the West Bank.

3. Comparative Crisis Response Audit: Ukraine (2022) vs. Gaza (2023-2024)

A critical method for determining political bias is the “Comparative Crisis Response” audit. By juxtaposing Uniqlo’s reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine against its reaction to the crisis in Gaza, a clear hierarchy of corporate victimhood emerges.

3.1 The Ukraine Response: Active Alignment (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Fast Retailing initially attempted to maintain the “Yanai Doctrine” of neutrality, famously stating that “clothing is a necessity of life” for Russians as well. However, facing a backlash from Western consumers and investors, the pivot was swift, decisive, and massive.

Dimension Ukraine Response Details
Financial Commitment $10 Million USD donation explicitly earmarked for UNHCR’s Ukraine response.24
Material Support Donation of 200,000 items of clothing (HEATTECH, blankets, AIRism masks).25
Operational Stance Suspension of Operations: All Uniqlo stores in Russia were temporarily closed. The statement explicitly cited “difficulties” and the “worsening of the conflict situation”.27
Rhetoric High-visibility press releases; explicit mention of “people forced to flee in Ukraine”; utilization of employees in Europe as volunteers.28
Political Alignment Fully aligned with G7/NATO sanctions regime and public sentiment.

3.2 The Gaza Response: Passive Humanitarianism (2023-2024)

In the wake of the events of October 7, 2023, and the subsequent bombardment of Gaza, Fast Retailing’s response was markedly different in tone, scale, and visibility.

Dimension Gaza Response Details
Financial Commitment No headline-grabbing emergency cash donation comparable to the $10M for Ukraine. Funding continued through pre-existing UNRWA frameworks.29
Material Support Donations were often bundled under general “refugee support” or the global “Heart of LifeWear” initiative (1 million items globally), rather than a specific “Gaza Relief” campaign.31 Recent donations to Jordan (530,000 items) support Palestinians but are framed regionally.32
Operational Stance No Suspension of Ties: There was no move to suspend relationships with Israeli technology vendors (Zeekit, Checkpoint, etc.). No boycott of Israeli products.
Rhetoric Usage of vague, depoliticized slogans like “Peace for All”.33 Avoidance of specific terms like “Gaza,” “Bombardment,” or “Occupation” in top-level corporate messaging.
Political Alignment Divergent from Global South sentiment; aligned with the US/Japan diplomatic stance of “balanced” relations.

3.3 Analysis of the Disparity

The discrepancy reveals that Fast Retailing’s “humanitarianism” is geopolitically conditional.

  1. Hierarchy of Humanity: The swift $10 million for Ukraine versus the quiet continuation of UNRWA aid for Gaza suggests that European crises are viewed as existential business threats requiring immediate action, while Middle Eastern crises are viewed as chronic conditions requiring maintenance.
  2. The “Peace for All” Shield: The launch and promotion of the “Peace for All” T-shirt campaign 33 serves as a strategic deflector. By selling shirts that promote a generic “world peace” and donating the proceeds to global NGOs (UNHCR, Save the Children), Uniqlo dilutes the specific urgency of the Gaza genocide. It allows consumers to feel they are “buying peace” without the company having to take a stance on the specific aggressor, unlike the clear stance taken against Russia via store closures.

4. The Humanitarian Shield: The UNRWA Partnership Paradox

While the technological audit suggests complicity, the humanitarian audit provides a significant counter-narrative. Uniqlo is one of the few major global corporations with a formal, sustained, and high-value partnership with UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East).

4.1 Scope and History of the Partnership

The partnership is not a reaction to the current news cycle but a structural pillar of Fast Retailing’s CSR.

  • Timeline: Began collaborating in 2011; formal partnership signed in 2016.34
  • Volume: Donation of millions of clothing items. For example, in 2016 alone, 42,000 pieces of winter clothing were sent to Palestinian refugees in Lebanon.34
  • Recent Activity: In February 2024, amidst the war, Uniqlo delivered 530,000 items of HEATTECH to Jordan at the request of UNHCR/UNRWA.32

4.2 Political Significance of Continued Support

In 2024, the Israeli government accused UNRWA employees of participating in the October 7 attacks, leading the US, Japan, and other nations to temporarily suspend funding. The Israeli Knesset subsequently passed legislation designating UNRWA a “terrorist organization” and banning its operations.

Crucial Finding: Throughout this period of intense diplomatic assault on UNRWA, Fast Retailing did not publicly sever its ties. The company’s 2024 sustainability materials continue to list refugee support as a core mission.35

  • Implicit Resistance: By maintaining this partnership when other Western corporations were fleeing, Uniqlo effectively took a stance against the Israeli government’s narrative regarding UNRWA. This represents a form of “Negative Complicity” (i.e., refusal to be complicit in the dismantling of Palestinian aid infrastructure).
  • The “Refugee” Frame: However, Uniqlo frames this support exclusively through the lens of “refugees”—a humanitarian category—rather than “rights” or “justice.” This framing allows them to provide aid without engaging in the political discourse of the Right of Return or the legality of the occupation. It is aid as charity, not aid as solidarity.

5. Trade Ties, Lobbying, and Logistics

5.1 The Logistics of Avoidance

Uniqlo maintains no physical retail stores in Israel. This absence functions as a “passive boycott,” though it is likely driven by market size and logistical complexity rather than ideology.

  • Shipping Barriers: Uniqlo US and Europe do not offer direct shipping to Israel. Israeli consumers must utilize third-party freight forwarding services like ColisExpat or Easy-Delivery to access Uniqlo products.36
  • Revenue Implication: This lack of direct access limits the tax revenue Uniqlo generates for the Israeli state, distinguishing it from brands like Zara (Inditex) or H&M, which have massive retail footprints in Israeli malls and are frequent targets of BDS protests.

5.2 Lobbying and the “Japan Inc.” Nexus

Fast Retailing is a prominent member of Keidanren (Japan Business Federation), the most powerful business lobby in Japan.

  • Structural Pressure: Keidanren has a dedicated “Committee on the Middle East and North Africa”.38 This committee historically advocates for energy security (oil imports) and, increasingly, for technological partnerships with Israel to reduce dependence on extractive industries.
  • The Abraham Accords Effect: The normalization of ties between Israel and UAE/Bahrain (the Abraham Accords) has significantly altered the landscape for Japanese firms.40 It has lowered the reputational risk of doing business with Israel. As a member of this ecosystem, Fast Retailing benefits from this diplomatic cover. The “Japan Israel Innovation Network” (JIIN) 23 facilitates the flow of Japanese capital to Tel Aviv, and Uniqlo’s tech scouting is a direct downstream effect of this high-level lobbying.

6. Political Complicity Scorecard

Based on the evidence gathered, Uniqlo’s political footprint regarding Israel/Palestine can be categorized using a tiered “Complicity Scorecard.”

Category Status Evidence Summary Complicity Level
Retail Operations Clean No stores in Israel or Settlements. No direct shipping. None
Manufacturing Clean No evidence of production in Israeli industrial zones. None
Technology Complicit Usage of Zeekit (Israeli military-origin AR), Checkpoint Systems (RFID R&D in Israel), MySizeID/Sizer profiling tech. High
Lobbying Passive Member of Keidanren/JIIN ecosystem promoting normalization; participation in 2018 Innovation Delegation. Medium
Humanitarianism Supportive Sustained, high-volume partnership with UNRWA despite political pressure to defund. Negative (Mitigating)
Crisis Rhetoric Complicit Silence on Gaza genocide vs. vocal condemnation of Russia; “Peace for All” depoliticization. Medium-High

  1. Directors | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD., accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/about/company/profile.html
  2. The Founder of Uniqlo Has a Wake-Up Call for Japan – Time Magazine, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://time.com/magazine/asia/6340081/december-4th-2023-vol-202-no-19-asia/
  3. Uniqlo caught in geopolitical tensions: Threats of boycott calls after founder’s Xinjiang comments | Eulerpool, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://eulerpool.com/en/news/unternehmen/uniqlo-gerat-in-geopolitische-spannungen-drohende-
  4. Tadashi Yanai – Wikipedia, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadashi_Yanai
  5. Kathy Matsui – MPower Partners, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.mpower-partners.com/team/kathy-matsui
  6. Directors | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD. – DigitalOcean, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://wikirate-production-storage.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/files/22451566/52248445.pdf
  7. Management members of FAST RETAILING Group | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD., accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/ir/news/1305021500.html
  8. Corporate Governance | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD., accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/about/governance/corpgovenance.html
  9. Fast Retailing Group Code of Conduct Guideline, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/about/compliance/pdf/CoC-guideline_eng.pdf
  10. BRAND BOYCOTT AND ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR 2023: MALAYSIA MCDONALDʼS AND STARBUCKS BRAND RESPONSE AND PERCEPTION, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://gaexcellence.com/aijbes/article/download/5817/5334/19638
  11. FAST RETAILING Group Code of Conduct, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/about/governance/frcoc.html
  12. AR Clothing Try On Tools: Who Benefits and How? – 3DLOOK, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://3dlook.ai/content-hub/ar-clothing-try-on-tools/
  13. startup nations | Israel very stylish when technology and fashion mix, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://jweekly.com/2016/11/24/startup-nations-israel-very-stylish-when-technology-and-fashion-mix/
  14. JD.com, Asos, Uniqlo and Ebay seek retail innovation technology in Israel, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://jewishbusinessnews.com/2018/11/05/asos-uniqlo-seek-retail-innovation-technology-israel/
  15. Apparel & Footwear Solutions | Checkpoint Systems, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://checkpointsystems.com/apparel-footwear-solutions/
  16. Smart Labels Market: Size, Growth, Trends, Forecast 2025-2030, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/smart-labels-market
  17. Top EAS Systems Market Companies – Rankings, Profiles, SWOT, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.reportprime.com/eas-systems-r1066/company
  18. accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/L1-Approved-Petitions-FY2016-12.27.17.csv
  19. MySize ASSIST | Online store – Uniqlo, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/sg/en/special-feature/mysize-assist
  20. MySize ASSIST | Online store – Uniqlo, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/special-feature/mysize-assist
  21. Latest Retail Industry News, Retailing Trends and Updates, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.alchempro.com/news/retail-industry?page=236
  22. What Happens When Clothing Bought Online Doesn’t Fit You? – Jinfeng Apparel, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://jinfengapparel.com/what-happens-when-clothing-bought-online-doesnt-fit-you/
  23. japanese business partners, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/israel/Japanese_Business_Partners_WEBver.pdf
  24. UNIQLO | UNHCR, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/our-partners/private-sector/uniqlo
  25. Fast Retailing, parent company of UNIQLO, pledges to donate US$10 Million and 200,000 Clothing Items to UNHCR to Support Humanitarian Aid for People Forced to Flee in Ukraine and Neighboring Countries – PR Newswire, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fast-retailing-parent-company-of-uniqlo-pledges-to-donate-us10-million-and-200-000-clothing-items-to-unhcr-to-support-humanitarian-aid-for-people-forced-to-flee-in-ukraine-and-neighboring-countries-301496163.html
  26. Donation includes HEATTECH innerwear and blankets, and other essential items | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD., accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/sustainability/news/2203041500.html
  27. Fast Retailing Statement Regarding UNIQLO Operations in Russia, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/ir/news/2203101800.html
  28. Response to Ukraine Crisis | UNIQLO TODAY, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/news/topics/2022042901/
  29. Fast Retailing Co. Ltd. – UNRWA, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.unrwa.org/organisations/fast-retailing-co-ltd
  30. UNIQLO | UNHCR, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.unhcr.org/us/about-unhcr/our-partners/private-sector/uniqlo
  31. INTEGRATED REPORT 2024 – Fast Retailing, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/ir/library/pdf/ar2024_en_sp.pdf
  32. The Heart of LifeWear Vol.10 | UNIQLO TODAY, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/news/topics/2025050701/
  33. UNIQLO PEACE FOR ALL | A charity T-shirt project for peace | UNIQLO NL, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/nl/en/special-feature/peace-for-all
  34. UNIQLO – UNRWA, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.unrwa.org/our-partners/private-partners/partnerships/uniqlo
  35. GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP | Unlocking The Power of Clothing. UNIQLO Sustainability, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.uniqlo.com/jp/en/contents/sustainability/society/refugees/unhcr_globalpartnership/
  36. Your Uniqlo purchases delivered to your door in Israel by ColisExpat, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.colisexpat.com/en/delivery-shipping/israel/uniqlo/
  37. Your orders at Uniqlo are delivered to Israel from the USA – Easy Delivery, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.easy-delivery.com/en/delivery/uniqlo/israel/US
  38. Keidanren Annual Report 2021, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/profile/Keidanren_Annual_Report2021.pdf
  39. Chairman Sakakibara Attends Sixth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD VI) (2016-08-28), accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/086.html
  40. Identity and Cultural Diplomacy of the Abraham Accords, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.merip.org/2025/10/identity-and-cultural-diplomacy-of-the-abraham-accords/
  41. As the Israel-Hamas war continues, the Abraham Accords quietly turns four – Atlantic Council, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/abraham-accords-anniversary-gaza/

 

Related News & Articles