Dell Political Audit

1. Executive Summary

1.1 Audit Mandate and Scope

This report constitutes an exhaustive forensic audit of Dell Technologies Inc. regarding its political and ideological footprint in the State of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The objective is to determine the entity’s “Political Complicity Score” based on a rigorous evaluation of its governance ideology, lobbying activities, internal policy consistency (the ‘Safe Harbor’ test), and operational support for systems of apartheid, surveillance, and militarisation.

The audit analyzes the extent to which Dell Technologies, through its leadership, capital allocation, and technological infrastructure, materially or ideologically sustains the Israeli military occupation and its associated mechanisms of control. This assessment is not limited to direct military sales but encompasses the broader “ecosystem of complicity,” including dual-use technology transfers, philanthropic interventions by leadership, and participation in state-sponsored demographic engineering projects in the Naqab (Negev).

1.2 Core Findings

The investigation reveals that Dell Technologies exhibits a critical level of integration with the Israeli security establishment. Unlike passive commercial actors, Dell functions as a strategic enabler of the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The company’s hardware constitutes the backbone of the IDF’s digital transformation, specifically empowering AI-driven targeting systems such as “Lavender” and “The Gospel,” which have been implicated in mass civilian casualties in Gaza.¹

Furthermore, the governance ideology of the corporation is indistinguishable from the personal Zionist activism of its founder, Michael Dell. His financial interventions—most notably a massive donation of shares in October 2023 coinciding with the onset of the Gaza bombardment—signal an explicit alignment with the state’s military objectives.³

1.3 Complicity Ranking

Based on the “Political Complicity Scale” (0.0 to 10.0), Dell Technologies is assigned a score of 8.8.

• Governance Ideology (Score: 9.5): Leadership is ideologically partisan, utilizing corporate and personal assets to bolster the Israeli state during active conflict.
• Lobbying & Trade (Score: 8.0): Deep institutional ties via the Friends of the IDF (FIDF), British-Israel Chamber of Commerce, and academic-military partnerships.
• Safe Harbor Test (Score: 9.0): The company exhibits a stark double standard, having swiftly exited the Russian market on humanitarian grounds while deepening commitment to Israel amidst credible allegations of genocide.
• Internal Policy (Score: 8.5): Human rights due diligence policies are systematically bypassed or selectively applied to facilitate military contracts.

2. Governance Ideology: The Fusion of Capital and Zionism

The governance ideology of a corporation is the foundational determinant of its political risk profile. In the case of Dell Technologies, the corporate ethos is inextricably linked to the geopolitical worldview of its founder and CEO, Michael Dell. The audit finds that the company’s governance structure does not operate on a principle of neutrality but rather functions as an extension of “Technological Zionism”—the belief that the Israeli technology sector, and by extension its military apparatus, is a moral and strategic imperative worth sustaining through direct capital injection and rhetorical defense.

2.1 The “Michael Dell” Factor: Philanthropy as Geopolitical Intervention

Michael Dell is not merely a passive investor in the Israeli economy; he is an active participant in the transnational network of support for the Israeli military. This distinction is critical for a governance audit, as it shifts the risk profile from “business opportunity” to “ideological commitment.”

2.1.1 The October 2023 Asset Transfer

In a definitive signal of ideological prioritization, SEC filings confirm that in October 2023—one month into the intensified military bombardment of Gaza—Michael Dell donated approximately $350 million worth of shares.³ While the filings list the recipient as a “private foundation” (likely the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation), the timing and context of this transfer are significant.

• Contextual Timing: The donation occurred during a period of extreme economic volatility in Israel, termed the “#ShutDownNation” phenomenon, where foreign investment was drying up due to the conflict.⁸
• Strategic Intent: Donating such a massive sum during a kinetic military campaign serves as a capital anchor. Reports indicate that the foundation has committed millions to “active projects across Israel,” including relief efforts that bolster national resilience during the war.¹⁰
• Shareholder Signal: This divestment and subsequent donation signaled to markets and employees that the CEO’s resources were being mobilized to support the Israeli ecosystem at its most critical moment.

2.1.2 Direct Financing of the IDF

Beyond the 2023 donation, Michael Dell has a documented history of direct financial support for the Friends of the IDF (FIDF), an organization dedicated to the material welfare of Israeli soldiers.

• The 2014 Gala: Michael Dell was a high-profile attendee and donor at the 2014 FIDF Western Region Gala in Los Angeles. This single event raised $33.5 million for the Israeli military.¹¹
• The “Billionaire’s Coalition”: Michael Dell is frequently cited alongside other mega-donors such as Larry Ellison and Haim Saban as the key figures who “keep the Israeli Defense Forces among the most formidable fighting units on the planet”.¹⁴
• Implication: By funding the FIDF, Dell’s leadership directly subsidizes the operational costs of the army. While FIDF often claims to fund “welfare” (scholarships, recreation), this fungible capital releases state funds for lethal munitions.

2.1.3 Rhetorical Alignment and State Endorsement

Governance ideology is also measured by public signaling. The audit reveals a consistent pattern of rhetorical support for the Israeli state, even when its leadership is under international legal scrutiny.

• The “Deep Commitment” (2016): At the Dell Future Ready Conference in Tel Aviv, Michael Dell stated, “We are deeply committed to Israel,” framing the company’s presence not as a market necessity but as a partnership in “incredible innovation”.¹
• The Herzog Endorsement (2024): In January 2024, amidst global outcry over the death toll in Gaza and ongoing ICJ proceedings, Michael Dell posted a photograph with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, stating: “It’s an honor to stand with @Isaac_Herzog and Israel”.¹
  • Legal Context: This endorsement occurred shortly after President Herzog made controversial statements blaming the entire population of Gaza for the events of October 7—statements that were later cited by the ICJ as evidence of plausible incitement to genocide.
  • Governance Risk: By aligning the corporate brand with a head of state accused of inciting war crimes, Michael Dell integrated his corporation into the diplomatic defense shield of the Israeli government.

2.2 Board Composition and the “Abraham Accords” Nexus

The governance audit extends to the board of directors and key investors, revealing a web of affiliations that reinforces the US-Israel-UAE strategic axis.

Table 1: Key Board Members and Geopolitical Affiliations

The Egon Durban / G42 Connection:

Egon Durban’s role is particularly notable. As a board member of Group 42 (G42) in the UAE, he sits at the intersection of the “Abraham Accords”—the diplomatic normalization between Israel and Arab states driven largely by the trade of cyber-intelligence and surveillance technologies.15 G42’s opening of an Israel office was a landmark event in this geopolitical realignment. Durban’s presence on Dell’s board ensures that the company is positioned to capitalize on this regional integration of surveillance architectures.

2.3 Structural Commitment to “Start-Up Nation” Ideology

The governance strategy of Dell Technologies is built on the premise of the “Start-Up Nation”—a narrative that creates a symbiotic relationship between the Israeli military’s R&D units and US tech capital.

• Historical Acquisitions: Dell’s footprint in Israel was established through the acquisition of companies founded by veterans of the Israeli intelligence community. This includes the acquisition of Exanet (2010), Illuminator (2007), and Kashya (2006).²⁰
• Leadership Pipeline: The leadership of Dell Israel R&D, such as Amit Preuss (Senior Director), often transit from military-linked firms like Nyotron.²⁰

Insight: The governance ideology of Dell is not neutral. It is actively Zionist, leveraging the immense capital and logistical power of the corporation to support the Israeli state. The leadership does not view the Israeli military or the occupation as reputational risks to be managed, but as strategic partners to be supported.

3. Operational Complicity: The Machinery of Militarisation

While governance establishes the intent, operational complicity measures the capability provided. Dell Technologies is not merely a vendor of generic office equipment; it is a provider of mission-critical kill-chain infrastructure. The audit reveals that Dell hardware forms the backbone of the Israeli Ministry of Defense’s (IMOD) computational capacity, enabling data-driven warfare, surveillance, and lethal targeting.

3.1 The 2023 Ministry of Defense Server Tender

In January 2023, Dell Technologies secured a tender valued at over $150 million to supply servers, maintenance, and related services to the Israeli Ministry of Defense, the IDF, and other security bodies.¹

Table 2: Operational Contract Analysis (2023 Tender)

Strategic Implication:

This contract places Dell at the foundation of the IDF’s digital transformation. Modern warfare, particularly the type waged in Gaza, relies on Edge Computing—the ability to process vast amounts of surveillance data (drone feeds, signal intercepts, facial recognition) in real-time to generate targets. By winning this tender, Dell effectively became the hardware host for the IDF’s operational brain.22

3.2 Enabling AI-Driven Genocide: “Lavender” and “The Gospel”

Recent revelations regarding the IDF’s use of Artificial Intelligence systems—specifically “Lavender” (a target identification system) and “The Gospel” (a structural targeting system)—implicate Dell’s infrastructure in the mass casualties observed in Gaza.

The Technological Link:

• Computational Necessity: AI systems like Lavender require massive computational power and low-latency storage to process data on millions of Palestinians. They function by analyzing behavioral patterns, social connections, and movement data to assign a “kill score” to individuals.
• Direct Hardware Usage: Internal documents and investigations indicate that Dell hardware is used to run these specific AI operations.¹
• The “Mass Assassination Factory”: The “Gospel” system generates targets at an industrial rate, a process described by former intelligence officers as a “mass assassination factory.” This “factory” runs on Dell servers.¹
• Edge Capability: Dell’s “rugged” servers (e.g., PowerEdge XR4000) are marketed specifically for “Military & Defense” to manage data at the “tactical edge”.²⁴ This capability allows the IDF to deploy AI targeting nodes closer to the battlefield in Gaza, reducing latency for drone strikes.

Insight: Dell’s complicity here is direct and kinetic. The company is not selling software that might be used for harm; it is selling the physical engines of the “kill chain.” The high casualty rate in Gaza, attributed to AI-generated targets with loose collateral damage parameters, is technically facilitated by the processing power Dell supplies.

3.3 The National Cyber Park and The Naqab (Negev)

Dell is a key partner in the National Cyber Park in the Naqab (Negev), specifically in Beer Sheva. This initiative is often framed as civilian innovation, but a forensic analysis reveals it as a project of Military-Civil Fusion and Settler-Colonial Displacement.

• Displacement of Bedouins: The development of the Cyber Park and the relocation of IDF technology units (such as Unit 8200 and the C4I Corps) to the Naqab are part of a broader state strategy to “Judaize” the region. This development often necessitates the forced displacement of indigenous Palestinian Bedouin communities to clear land for military and industrial use.²¹
• Military Integration: The park is designed to bridge the gap between the IDF’s elite technology units and the private sector. Dell’s subsidiary, EMC Israel Advanced Information Technologies, was a pioneer in this park, physically co-locating with military cyber units.¹
• Kiryat Hatikshuv: Dell was chosen in 2013 to help establish the military technology security facility in the Naqab.²³ This facility, known as “Kiryat Hatikshuv,” is the central nervous system of the IDF’s technology corps.
• Contractual Obligations: By anchoring its R&D and operations in this militarized zone, Dell actively participates in the demographic engineering of the Naqab and benefits from the state-subsidized infrastructure built on appropriated land.

3.4 VMware and the Police State Legacy

Between 2016 and 2021, when Dell held a majority stake in VMware, the subsidiary signed a comprehensive agreement (NIS 100 million) with the IMOD.

• Unlimited Access: The agreement granted the Israeli military “unlimited” access to VMware’s virtualization technologies for all new and future projects.²¹
• Police Contracts: In 2021, VMware Israel secured a contract to supply the Israel Police with products through 2027.²⁶ The Israel Police are the primary enforcers of the occupation in East Jerusalem and within Israel, utilizing surveillance systems like “Hawk Eye” (license plate recognition) and the “Wolf Pack” database.
• Legacy of Systems: Even if ownership structures shift (Dell spun off VMware in late 2021), the systems implemented during Dell’s tenure remain the backbone of the occupation’s IT infrastructure. The virtualization of military servers allows for the efficient management of the massive databases used to control the Palestinian population.

4. Lobbying, Trade, and Institutional Partnerships

Dell Technologies does not operate in a vacuum. It is deeply embedded in the network of trade associations, academic partnerships, and lobby groups that insulate Israel from political pressure and maintain the flow of military aid.

4.1 “Friends of the IDF” (FIDF) and Gala Diplomacy

As detailed in the Governance section, the leadership’s involvement with FIDF is a primary vector of support. However, this activity also falls under “Lobbying & Trade” because these galas function as high-level networking nodes where military officials, US politicians, and tech oligarchs align their strategies.

• Impact: Raising $33 million in a single night ¹¹ provides discretionary funding for the IDF that bypasses government oversight.
• Networking: The presence of figures like Haim Saban and Larry Ellison alongside Michael Dell creates a unified “Tech-Zionist” lobby that can exert pressure on US foreign policy regarding technology export controls and military aid.¹¹

4.2 Academic-Military Partnerships: The “Technion” Connection

Dell maintains strategic partnerships with Israeli academic institutions that are deeply integrated into the military-industrial complex.

The Technion (Israel Institute of Technology):

• Partnership: Dell is listed as a corporate partner of the Technion.²⁷
• Military Role: The Technion is widely considered the R&D wing of the Israeli military. It has developed technologies for drones, autonomous bulldozers (used in home demolitions), and missile defense systems.
• Joint R&D: Reports indicate that PTC and Dell clients utilize Technion research to improve production and development.²⁸
• Counter-Narrative: Interestingly, some departments at the Technion have replaced Dell systems with Synology due to cost and complexity, highlighting that Dell’s dominance is not absolute, though its strategic partnership remains.²⁹

Hebrew University and the “Talpiot” Pipeline:

• Recruitment: Dell Technologies Capital (DTC) recruits from and partners with graduates of Hebrew University, particularly those from the elite military intelligence program “Talpiot” or Unit 8200.³⁰
• Research Cooperation: DTC partners like Yair Snir (Hebrew U alumnus) facilitate the transfer of academic/military research into commercial applications.³⁰

These partnerships serve a dual purpose: they provide Dell with access to military-grade IP developed by the state, and they provide the Israeli military-academic complex with the legitimacy and funding of a global Fortune 500 company.

4.3 Dell Technologies Capital (DTC) and Unit 8200

Dell’s venture capital arm, Dell Technologies Capital (DTC), functions as a pipeline for “laundering” military technology into the civilian market. This is a key aspect of Israel’s “Military-Civil Fusion.”

• Personnel: DTC’s leadership in Israel includes Barrel Kfir, a former officer in the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Intelligence Corps, and Yair Snir, who has a background in military-aligned tech.³⁰
• Investment Strategy: DTC heavily invests in cybersecurity and AI startups founded by veterans of Unit 8200 (the IDF’s SIGINT and cyberwarfare unit). For example, DTC invests in Legit Security, founded by Roni Fuchs and Liav Caspi, both ex-Unit 8200.³³
• The Feedback Loop: By investing in these startups, Dell rewards military service in the occupation forces with lucrative exits and capital. This reinforces the prestige of Unit 8200 and ensures a steady stream of talent dedicated to developing surveillance technologies that are field-tested on Palestinians before being sold globally.

4.4 Trade Chambers and Anti-BDS Activity

Dell is listed as a priority target by the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement due to its high complicity.⁸ In response, the company leverages trade associations to maintain market access.

• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (BICC): Dell has been associated with the BICC, an organization dedicated to increasing bilateral trade and providing “soft advocacy” for Israel.³⁴ The BICC actively works to counter the BDS movement and normalize trade with settlement industries.
• Settlement Industrial Zones: Reports indicate that Dell’s products and services permeate the settlement industrial zones in the West Bank, often via third-party integrators or direct subsidiaries like EMC.²¹

5. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test: Internal Policy and Dissent

A critical measure of corporate complicity is how a company manages internal dissent and applies its “human rights” policies. The ‘Safe Harbor’ test asks: Is the company a neutral ground for employees, or does it enforce a specific ideological conformity? The audit utilizes a comparative case study of Dell’s response to the Ukraine war versus the Gaza genocide.

5.1 The Ukraine vs. Gaza Double Standard

Dell’s internal policy exhibits a stark hypocrisy regarding geopolitical conflicts, revealing a discriminatory application of its ethical standards.

Table 3: Comparative Policy Analysis (Ukraine vs. Gaza)

Analysis:

• Selective Morality: When Russia invaded Ukraine, Dell immediately recognized the moral imperative to cease supplying technology that could aid the aggressor. The withdrawal was complete and public.
• Complicity in Gaza: Conversely, when the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza, Dell did not suspend operations. Instead, it increased its material support through the massive share donation and the fulfillment of the IMOD server contract.
• Hardware as a Weapon: By cutting off Russia, Dell acknowledged that its servers are critical assets for a state’s war machine. By continuing to supply Israel, Dell knowingly provides those same critical assets to the IDF.

5.2 Suppression of Employee Dissent

While specific public reports of Dell employee firings are less numerous than those of Google or Microsoft (who faced the “No Tech For Apartheid” campaign), the industry-wide trend is relevant due to shared investors and board interlocks.

• Culture of Silence: The CEO’s public fraternization with the Israeli President creates a hostile environment for Palestinian employees or allies. It signals that pro-Israel activism is rewarded (FIDF donations) while pro-Palestine activism is viewed as oppositional to the company’s “deep commitment.”
• The Microsoft Precedent: Reports of Microsoft firing employees for organizing vigils for Gaza ⁴¹ set a chilling precedent for the entire tech sector. Dell’s close partnership with Microsoft (Azure/VMware integration) suggests a shared corporate culture regarding dissent.
• Internal Policy Weaponization: The adoption of definitions of antisemitism that conflate anti-Zionism with hate speech effectively removes the “Safe Harbor” for employees wishing to protest the company’s complicity in war crimes.

6. Internal Policy: The “Dual-Use” Alibi and Human Rights Policy

Dell’s Human Rights Policy claims to “respect the human rights of all people” and to hold suppliers to high standards.¹ However, the audit reveals a systemic failure in Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) regarding its Israeli contracts.

6.1 The Failure of Due Diligence in Conflict Zones

International standards, specifically the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), require “heightened due diligence” in conflict-affected areas to ensure business activities do not contribute to human rights abuses.⁴⁴

• The Violation: Dell continues to supply the IMOD despite clear evidence that its equipment is used to commit war crimes (e.g., targeting civilian infrastructure, maintaining the siege of Gaza, AI-driven assassinations).
• The Alibi: Tech companies often hide behind the “Dual-Use” argument—that they sell generic servers, and how the client uses them is not their responsibility.
• The Rebuttal: The 2023 tender was specifically for the Ministry of Defense and the Army.²² When a company sells servers directly to an army engaged in an occupation, the “dual-use” defense collapses. They are selling military supplies.
• Supply Chain Obscurity: Dell often utilizes third-party integrators (like Matrix or Bynet) to obscure the final destination of its products in the West Bank, effectively laundering its complicity.³⁷

6.2 The “Ethical Company” Paradox

Dell boasts of being recognized as “One of the World’s Most Ethical Companies” by Ethisphere.¹ This audit exposes the hollowness of such certifications.

• Greenwashing/Ethics-Washing: These ratings heavily weight bureaucratic compliance, environmental sustainability, and “diversity” metrics while completely ignoring geopolitical complicity in apartheid or genocide.
• Strategic Distraction: Dell uses these awards as a “reputation shield,” allowing it to deflect criticism of its Israeli military contracts. The internal policy is designed to maximize ESG scores while ignoring the lethal consequences of its products in Palestine.
• Conflict Minerals: While Dell has policies on conflict minerals in the DRC ⁴³, it lacks any equivalent policy for “Conflict Technology” in Palestine, despite the latter involving direct contract with the perpetrators of violence.

7. Comparative Analysis: Dell vs. Tech Peers

To contextualize Dell’s ranking, it is useful to compare it with other tech giants identified in the research material.

Table 4: Comparative Complicity Matrix

Differentiation:

Dell distinguishes itself through the personal intensity of its CEO’s Zionism and the criticality of its hardware (servers) for the AI era of warfare. While HP provides the architecture of control (checkpoints/ID cards), Dell provides the architecture of lethality (the targeting brain). The CEO’s direct donation of $350 million in shares during the war is a unique differentiator that elevates Dell’s ideological score above its peers.

Works cited

1. Dell’s complicity in Israel’s genocide | The Electronic Intifada, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/dells-complicity-israels-genocide/50824
2. Dell supplied tech used in Israeli kill-list programs: Report – The Cradle, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://thecradle.co/articles-id/32151
3. Economic Power: Boycott Dell – CNY Solidarity Coalition, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.cnysolidarity.org/2025/10/13/economic-power-boycott-dell/
4. Form 144 for Dell Technologies INC filed 12/27/2023, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/733bee9e-78cf-4f7b-b6eb-1a0ab57eb725
5. Michael Dell – Wikipedia, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dell
6. Insider Sale: Chief Executive Officer of $DELL Sells 6,253,968 Shares – Quiver Quantitative, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Insider+Sale%3A+Chief+Executive+Officer+of+%24DELL+Sells+6%2C253%2C968+Shares
7. Dell Technologies Executives Engage in Major Stock Transactions – TradingView, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:6fdfd769b98fe:0-dell-technologies-executives-engage-in-major-stock-transactions/
8. Guide to BDS Boycott & Pressure Corporate Priority Targeting, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/Guide-to-BDS-Boycott
9. No Tech for Oppression, Apartheid or Genocide | BDS Movement, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/no-tech-oppression-apartheid-or-genocide
10. No. 14: Jan Koum, Michael Dell, Bill Ackman, Marc Benioff, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg – The Jerusalem Post, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/influencers-25/50jews-25/article-867920
11. Star-studded gala raises $33 million for IDF – Ynetnews, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/article/4589328
12. $33 Million: Hollywood Heavyweights Raise Megabucks as Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces – TheWrap, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.thewrap.com/33-million-hollywood-heavyweights-raise-megabucks-as-friends-of-the-israeli-defense-forces/
13. Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces 2014 Western Region Gala – Getty Images, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/friends-of-the-israel-defense-forces-2014-western-region-gala
14. Founding Funders – Philanthropy Roundtable, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/magazine/fall-2016-founding-funders/
15. G42 Announces Investment by Silver Lake | Invent a Better Everyday | Abu Dhabi, UAE, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.g42.ai/resources/news/g42-announces-investment-by-silver-lake
16. US-based investment firm picks up stake in Abu Dhabi tech firm Group42 – Gulf News, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://gulfnews.com/business/us-based-investment-firm-picks-up-stake-in-abu-dhabi-tech-firm-group42-1.1618407661489
17. Board – Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.dell.org/board/
18. Committee Composition – Dell Technologies Investor Relations, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/863f3ed1-22b0-4f9c-bad9-b9eb9f814f7f
19. Mid-Decade Challenges to National Competitiveness | SCSP, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.scsp.ai/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SCSP-Mid-Decade-Challenges-to-National-Competitiveness.pdf
20. Dell Technologies Israel R&D – IVC Data & Insights, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ivc-online.com/Google-Card?id=3296093e-207a-e111-ac59-00155d32a403
21. Does Dell support Israel? Role in military and tech sectors – Brussels Morning, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://brusselsmorning.com/does-dell-support-israel-role-in-military-and-tech-sectors/76644/
22. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Dell Technologies – Who Profits, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7370?dell-technologies
23. Dell – BDS Aotearoa, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://bdsaotearoa.nz/economic-boycott/dell
24. OEM Solutions for Military and Defense Industry | Dell USA, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.dell.com/en-us/lp/dt/oem-solutions-military
25. Guide to BDS Boycott & Pressure Corporate Priority Targeting, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/sites/default/files/2024-12/Guide%20to%20BDS%20Boycott%20%26%20Pressure%20Corporate%20Priority%20Targeting-30%20Nov%202024-Submitted%20by%20BDS%20movement.pdf
26. Israel Occupation: How Microsoft, IBM, CISCO, Dell Enable Surveillance, Control in Palestine, accessed on December 12, 2025, http://alwaght.net/en/News/239669/Israel-Occupation-How-Microsoft,-IBM,-CISCO,-Dell-Enable-Surveillance,-Control-in-Palestine
27. Partners | Ainikitrade, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ainikitrade.com/partners
28. Successful collaboration: academia & industry – הטכניון-מכון טכנולוגי לישראל, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.technion.ac.il/en/blog/2022/12/successful-collaboration-academia-industry/
29. Technion-Israel Institute of Technology | Synology Inc., accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.synology.com/en-me/company/case_study/IL_Technion
30. DTC | Yair Snir – Dell Technologies Capital, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.delltechnologiescapital.com/team/yair-snir
31. IQM Announces Academic Research Cooperation on Quantum Technologies – HPCwire, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/iqm-announces-academic-research-cooperation-on-quantum-technologies/
32. DTC | Barrel Kfir – Dell Technologies Capital, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.delltechnologiescapital.com/team/barrel-kfir
33. About Us | Legit Security, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.legitsecurity.com/about-us
34. JLife Leeds April 2025 by nutsforprint1 – Issuu, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://issuu.com/nutsforprint1/docs/jlife_leeds_april_2025
35. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
36. Member – Jewish Manchester, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://jewishmanchester.org/staff-category/member/
37. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/excel?Text=Naqab&Type=Table
38. Michael Dell: Russia’s Ukraine Invasion Is ‘A Great Tragedy’ | CRN, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.crn.com/news/data-center/michael-dell-russia-s-ukraine-invasion-is-a-great-tragedy
39. Invasion of Ukraine, American firm Dell closes offices in Russia – Balkanweb.com, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.balkanweb.com/en/pushtimi-i-ukraines-firma-amerikane-dell-mbyll-zyrat-ne-rusi/
40. Dell ceases all Russian operations after August offices closure – Al Jazeera, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/8/27/dell-ceases-all-russian-operations-after-august-offices-closure
41. USA: Microsoft fires worker who interrupted CEO speech protesting against the company supplying technology to the Israeli military during war on Gaza – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-microsoft-fires-worker-who-interrupted-ceo-speech-protesting-against-the-company-supplying-technology-to-the-israeli-military-during-war-on-gaza/
42. Microsoft fires engineer who disrupted Satya Nadella’s keynote over Israel ties, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/microsoft-fires-engineer-who-disrupted-satya-nadellas-keynote-over-israel-ties/articleshow/121377562.cms
43. lawsuit – SEC.gov, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000121465920007479/d826200px14a6g.htm
44. Switched off: Tech company opacity & Israel’s war on Gaza – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/briefings/tech-sector-opt-analysis-2024/
45. Downstream ITC companies fail to engage with heightened risks of indirectly financing M23 rebel armed group through sourcing tantalum from eastern DRC – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/downstream-itc-companies-fail-to-engage-with-heightened-risks-of-indirectly-financing-m23-rebel-armed-group-through-sourcing-tantalum-from-eastern-drc/
46. 812 Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Gala Stock Photos & High-Res Pictures, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/friends-of-the-israel-defense-forces-gala