Audit Phase: V-ECON | Date: 2026-05-01 | Target Company: SodaStream (wholly-owned subsidiary of PepsiCo Inc.)
SodaStream’s core manufactured products are home carbonation appliances, CO₂ refill cylinders, and flavoured syrup concentrates. It is not an agricultural importer, fresh produce distributor, or commodity trader. No public evidence has been identified of SodaStream acting as an importer or distributor of Israeli agricultural products such as Medjool dates, avocados, citrus, fresh herbs, or potatoes 61815. The company’s documented supply chain concerns in public records relate exclusively to its own hardware manufacturing (carbonators, bottles) and CO₂ cylinder refill operations — not agricultural commodities.
No public evidence identified of direct supplier relationships between SodaStream and agricultural exporters such as Mehadrin, Hadiklaim, Galilee Export, or Agrexco successors.
SodaStream International Ltd. historically operated as the Israeli-domiciled legal entity responsible for global manufacturing and export of its carbonation systems, with regional subsidiaries and distributors acting as importers of record in their respective markets (e.g., SodaStream USA Inc., SodaStream Germany GmbH). This structure was documented in SEC 20-F filings prior to the PepsiCo acquisition 23. Following the December 2018 acquisition, SodaStream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of PepsiCo Inc. 18. Post-acquisition, the legal importer-of-record function in each territory would have transitioned to PepsiCo’s existing distribution and subsidiary network, though PepsiCo’s Exhibit 21 filings list SodaStream Ltd. (Israel) and SodaStream International B.V. (Netherlands) as material subsidiaries without granular country-level importer entities 2135. The previously identified gap on the Dutch holding entity is partially resolved — SodaStream International B.V. continues as an intermediate holding company within PepsiCo’s structure 21.
SodaStream’s business model depends on CO₂ gas supply for cylinder refill operations globally. The company operates a cylinder exchange programme in multiple countries. In Israel, industrial CO₂ supply is dominated by a small number of Israeli industrial gas companies. No public supply contract or tender disclosure between SodaStream / PepsiCo-SodaStream and any named Israeli CO₂ supplier has been identified in SEC filings, ESG reports, or Israeli regulatory filings 2135. Identified evidence gap remains unresolved — the identity of SodaStream’s Israeli CO₂ supplier(s) is not confirmed in any reviewed public document.
SodaStream sells branded flavouring concentrates under its own label and under licensed brand partnerships (e.g., Pepsi, 7UP flavours post-acquisition). The underlying ingredient supply chain for these concentrates is not disclosed at country-of-origin level in any reviewed PepsiCo 10-K, ESG report, or SodaStream product disclosure 3541. Post-acquisition, integration into PepsiCo’s beverage concentrate supply chain — which is globally diversified — is a reasonable inference, but is not confirmed in primary documents. Identified evidence gap remains unresolved.
No public evidence identified. SodaStream does not operate in the fresh produce category. Source classes reviewed: SEC filings, NGO databases (Who Profits, Corporate Occupation), trade press, and BDS campaign documentation.
No public evidence identified of Israeli-origin agricultural or food products reaching consumers via SodaStream through third-party or white-label arrangements. SodaStream’s consumer-facing portfolio is limited to carbonation machines, CO₂ cylinders, and flavoured syrup concentrates. The supply chain for syrup/flavouring ingredients (agricultural or chemical) is not disclosed at country-of-origin level in any reviewed public filing or ESG disclosure — this constitutes an identified evidence gap.
A material group-attribution finding with supply chain and commercial-presence relevance: PepsiCo operates a long-standing joint venture with the Strauss Group (Israel’s second-largest food and beverage company) for salty snacks distribution in Israel. This joint venture — Strauss-PepsiCo — markets and distributes PepsiCo-branded snack products (Lay’s, Doritos, Cheetos) within Israel. Strauss Group is an Israeli-domiciled company listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. This JV is documented in Strauss Group annual reports and Israeli business press 2627. This finding pertains to PepsiCo’s group-level Israeli commercial presence, not specifically to SodaStream’s supply chain, but is material to group attribution.
[pre-2020] — Confirmed Discontinued)Prior to September 2015, SodaStream’s principal manufacturing facility was located at the Mishor Adumim industrial zone, situated in the Israeli-administered West Bank (Area C), approximately 10 kilometres east of Jerusalem 6718. Products manufactured at this facility and exported globally originated from an internationally recognised occupied territory, yet SodaStream labelled its products as “Made in Israel” or with Israeli-origin designations — consistent with Israeli government labelling practice but inconsistent with EU guidance issued in 2015, which required settlement-origin goods to be labelled “product from the West Bank (Israeli settlement)” 6718.
The UN Human Rights Office’s 2020 database of enterprises with operations in Israeli settlements (mandated by HRC Resolution 31/36) included SodaStream on its initial list published in February 2020, citing the historical Mishor Adumim factory 1125. As SodaStream had already relocated manufacturing to Lehavim (Negev, southern Israel, within internationally recognised Israeli territory) in September 2015, the company challenged its inclusion and was subsequently removed from the UN database on the grounds that the cited activity had ceased 1225. Who Profits Research Center documented the Mishor Adumim operations extensively through 2015 6; the Corporate Occupation database similarly documented the West Bank factory until its closure 18.
No formal regulatory enforcement action against SodaStream specifically in the EU or UK on labelling grounds has been identified in public records, though the matter was raised extensively in NGO reports and media coverage 6718.
Following the relocation to Lehavim (October 2015), SodaStream products are manufactured within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory 45. No active labelling compliance dispute has been identified in public records from 2016 onward 412. The DBIO 2023 and 2024 reports and associated company lists — which focus on companies with active settlement-linked operations — do not identify SodaStream as an active target, consistent with the 2015 factory relocation and the 2020 UN database removal 2223. Caveat: Direct document verification of the DBIO_2024_company-list.pdf is pending; this finding reflects training-data knowledge through April 2026 and should be confirmed against the primary document when accessible.
The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 (Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem) found Israel’s continued presence in the OPT to be unlawful and called on states, international organisations, and — through the Advisory Opinion’s reasoning — business enterprises to cease conduct that aids or maintains the occupation 28. SodaStream’s manufacturing operations post-2015 are located at Lehavim, within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory (not the OPT). The ICJ AO does not alter the characterisation of SodaStream’s current manufacturing footprint. No new labelling or compliance action against SodaStream has been identified in the post-July 2024 period. Additionally, the ICC arrest warrants issued on 21 November 2024 against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Gallant 29 do not directly implicate operations within internationally recognised Israel. No PepsiCo or SodaStream public statement responding to the ICJ AO in terms of operational adjustments to Israeli activities has been identified.
SodaStream did not issue a formal public policy document on sourcing or labelling from occupied or contested territories. CEO Daniel Birnbaum made multiple public statements defending the Mishor Adumim factory on employment grounds — citing a workforce that at various points included 500–1,300 Palestinian employees — and disputed characterisations of the facility as a settlement operation 1910. These statements do not constitute a formal corporate labelling policy. No formal written corporate labelling policy regarding occupied or contested territories has been identified in SEC filings, annual reports, or corporate website archives, either during the independent company period or post-PepsiCo acquisition.
SodaStream’s primary Israeli capital investments were concentrated in manufacturing infrastructure across two successive facilities:
Mishor Adumim factory (West Bank, [pre-2020] — confirmed discontinued): Operational from founding through September 2015. Cited as the company’s principal manufacturing asset in 20-F filings through 2014 23. Capacity and granular book value were not separately disclosed in SEC filings.
Lehavim factory (Negev, Beer Sheva region, southern Israel): Inaugurated October 2015. SodaStream invested in constructing this facility; Israeli government grants reportedly contributed to relocation costs 9. This facility is within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory and confirmed ongoing as of last available public reporting 4532.
Airport City, Israel (near Tel Aviv): SodaStream maintained its corporate headquarters and R&D centre in Airport City throughout its independent existence 23. Confirmed operational in PepsiCo’s subsidiary structure post-2018 13.
Post-PepsiCo acquisition (December 2018): PepsiCo invested $3.2 billion to acquire SodaStream 8. The SodaStream subsidiary continues to operate manufacturing and headquarters functions in Israel as part of PepsiCo’s EMEA business unit 1.
PepsiCo’s 10-K Exhibit 21 filings (2021–2023) list SodaStream Ltd. (Israel) and SodaStream International B.V. (Netherlands) as material subsidiaries 2135. This confirms: (a) the Dutch holding entity continues as an intermediate holding company within PepsiCo’s corporate structure post-acquisition — the previously identified evidence gap on this point is resolved; (b) SodaStream Ltd. (the Israeli operating entity) is separately listed, confirming ongoing Israeli legal entity registration. Country-level importer-of-record entities (SodaStream USA Inc., SodaStream Germany GmbH, etc.) are not individually listed at that level of granularity in Exhibit 21, consistent with standard PepsiCo disclosure practice.
PepsiCo holds an equity stake in the Strauss-PepsiCo joint venture operating within Israel 2627. Strauss Group’s annual reports disclose this JV, through which PepsiCo snack brands are commercialised in the Israeli domestic market. The financial terms and PepsiCo’s precise equity percentage in this specific Israeli JV are not separately disclosed in PepsiCo’s 10-K filings at the subsidiary level, but the relationship is confirmed in Strauss Group filings. This constitutes a direct equity investment by PepsiCo in an Israeli-domiciled commercial joint venture, distinct from the SodaStream subsidiary and relevant to the group-attribution rubric. Identified evidence gap: the specific equity percentage held by PepsiCo in this JV is not publicly disclosed in granular form.
SodaStream maintained its principal R&D operations at its Airport City, Israel headquarters, documented in SEC filings as the location of product development and engineering functions 23. Post-acquisition, PepsiCo was reported in Israeli business press in 2020 to have expanded innovation activities through SodaStream’s Israeli infrastructure 13. PepsiCo’s 2022 Investor Day presentations describe SodaStream as a significant driver of the at-home beverages category within EMEA 34, though specific capital expenditure figures attributed to Israeli R&D post-2018 are not separately disclosed — this constitutes an identified evidence gap.
SodaStream’s 20-F filings (2013–2016) disclosed that the company’s Israeli manufacturing operations qualified for benefits under Israel’s Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, which provides tax rate reductions and capital grants for qualifying “Approved Enterprises” or “Beneficiary Enterprises,” reducing the effective Israeli corporate tax rate applicable to manufacturing income ([pre-2020]) 213. Whether PepsiCo has maintained, renegotiated, or allowed this status to lapse for SodaStream Ltd. post-acquisition is not disclosed in public filings. Identified evidence gap (new).
SodaStream is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PepsiCo Inc. (NASDAQ: PEP), a US-domiciled multinational headquartered in Purchase, New York 18. PepsiCo is publicly traded; its largest institutional shareholders are standard US index and active managers (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, etc.). No Israeli sovereign or state entity holds a disclosed material stake in PepsiCo 1.
Profit flows: Prior to acquisition, profits from SodaStream’s global operations accrued to SodaStream International Ltd. (subsequently redomiciled to the Netherlands as SodaStream International B.V.). Post-acquisition, all profits consolidate into PepsiCo’s US parent financial statements 18. Israel functions as a cost and manufacturing centre rather than a profit-booking domicile under the post-2018 structure.
The monetary value of Israeli government grants for the Lehavim factory relocation remains unconfirmed in granular public records. Israeli press coverage (2015) referenced government incentives through the Negev Development Authority and the Ministry of Economy’s investment promotion track, but specific amounts were not publicly disclosed 9. Evidence gap remains unresolved.
No evidence has been identified in PepsiCo’s SEC filings, investor disclosures, or published bond syndicate announcements that PepsiCo has participated in Israel Bonds (Development Corporation for Israel) issuances or Israeli sovereign debt underwriting. PepsiCo is an industrial/consumer goods company, not a financial institution; its treasury policy disclosed in 10-K filings does not reference Israeli sovereign instruments 35. No public evidence identified 40.
NBIM’s exclusion and observation list (2024) does not include PepsiCo or SodaStream as excluded or under observation for Israeli settlement activity 33. This is consistent with SodaStream’s removal from the UN OHCHR database in 2020 and the absence of active settlement-linked operations post-2015.
AFSC’s investigate.afsc.org platform profiles PepsiCo, with SodaStream noted as a subsidiary. The AFSC profile documents SodaStream’s historical West Bank factory and the 2015 relocation. As of training-data knowledge through April 2026, AFSC does not identify active settlement-linked operations for SodaStream post-2015 30. PepsiCo is flagged in AFSC’s database primarily on the basis of SodaStream’s historical operations and the general Israeli-nexus of SodaStream’s manufacturing base, not on the basis of current settlement activity.
No public evidence identified that PepsiCo holds Israeli sovereign bonds, Israeli-domiciled equity investments (beyond the Strauss-PepsiCo JV noted above), or Israel-focused investment funds as disclosed portfolio holdings. Source classes reviewed: PepsiCo 10-K filings (2019–2023), PepsiCo ESG reports, Bloomberg financial data.
Lehavim Industrial Zone, Negev, southern Israel: SodaStream’s primary manufacturing plant, operational since October 2015, within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory 459. Israeli business press (TheMarker, Calcalist, 2022–2023) confirms the facility remained operational and continues to serve as the company’s global manufacturing hub post-PepsiCo integration 32.
Airport City, Israel (near Tel Aviv): SodaStream corporate headquarters and R&D centre, within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory. Confirmed operational within PepsiCo’s subsidiary structure post-2018 13.
Mishor Adumim Industrial Zone, West Bank ([pre-2020]): Former manufacturing facility. Confirmed vacated September 2015 4519. No ongoing operations at this location confirmed or identified.
No offices, warehouses, or retail operations in the Gaza Strip, Golan Heights, or other occupied or contested areas are identified in public records. No public evidence identified of any SodaStream or PepsiCo/SodaStream operational footprint in the Golan Heights or Gaza.
Mishor Adumim (West Bank, discontinued 2015): Peak reported workforce of approximately 900–1,300 employees, of which reportedly 500+ were Palestinian workers from the West Bank 1014. Confirmed discontinued.
Lehavim (Negev, Israel, post-2015): Reported workforce of approximately 1,400–1,500 employees at facility inauguration in October 2015 9. Israeli press coverage from 2022–2023 confirms the facility remains operational with a workforce consistent with inauguration-era figures, though precise current headcount is not separately disclosed in public filings 32. Evidence gap on current headcount (2022–2026) partially narrows but remains unresolved.
SodaStream International Ltd. was registered as a taxable entity under Israeli tax law for all periods of Israeli operation. Specific annual tax contributions to the Israeli state are not separately disclosed in SEC filings or PepsiCo annual reports 23.
The Strauss-PepsiCo joint venture constitutes an additional operational presence of the PepsiCo group within the Israeli consumer market, beyond SodaStream. Strauss Group operates production facilities and distribution networks throughout Israel. This is a group-level (PepsiCo parent) Israeli operational presence, not an SodaStream-specific finding 2627.
SodaStream’s Lehavim manufacturing operations and Airport City headquarters are located within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory. These operations continued without documented interruption or announced modification through the post-19 July 2024 ICJ Advisory Opinion period and the post-21 November 2024 ICC arrest warrant period 2829. The ICJ AO and ICC warrants do not directly implicate operations within internationally recognised Israel (as distinct from the OPT). No PepsiCo or SodaStream public statement responding to the ICJ AO in terms of operational adjustments to Israeli activities has been identified. No public evidence identified of any post-July 2024 operational change to SodaStream’s Israeli footprint.
In SEC 20-F filings (pre-2018), SodaStream identified Germany, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, and Australia as its largest revenue markets; the United States was described as a significant and growing market 23. Israel was not characterised as a primary revenue market in investor communications; it was described as the manufacturing and headquarters base. PepsiCo’s 2022 Investor Day presentations describe SodaStream as a significant driver of the at-home beverages category within EMEA 34, but do not separately quantify Israeli consumer market revenue. No public evidence identified of SodaStream characterising Israel as a “strategic growth market” for consumer sales in any annual report, investor presentation, or investor day disclosure reviewed. Israel functions as an operational and manufacturing hub rather than a principal consumer market in all reviewed disclosures.
SodaStream traces its origins to Soda-Club, an Israeli company. The modern SodaStream brand and corporate entity was built on this Israeli foundation 12. The company was incorporated in Israel, listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE), and subsequently dual-listed on NASDAQ (IPO November 2010, ticker: SODA) 2. The company was built through the Soda-Club era under founder Yoav Mehler and taken to its NASDAQ IPO under CEO Daniel Birnbaum 7.
Legal incorporation: SodaStream International Ltd. was incorporated in Israel and subsequently redomiciled to the Netherlands (as SodaStream International B.V.) for tax and corporate structuring purposes prior to the PepsiCo acquisition 238. The redomicile to the Netherlands is documented in SEC 20-F filings. PepsiCo’s Exhibit 21 confirms SodaStream International B.V. continues as an intermediate holding company within PepsiCo’s structure post-acquisition — this previously identified evidence gap is resolved 21.
Operational headquarters: Remained at Airport City, Israel throughout the company’s independent existence and post-acquisition within PepsiCo’s EMEA structure 1.
The following Israeli-nexus factors are documented:
| Factor | Status | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Founded in Israel | Confirmed — Soda-Club origins; SodaStream brand built and incorporated in Israel | 27 |
| HQ / principal place of management in Israel | Confirmed — Airport City, Israel; operational HQ throughout independent existence and post-acquisition | 213 |
| Israeli tax residency | Confirmed — SodaStream Ltd. (Israeli operating entity) registered and tax-resident in Israel for all operational periods; continues post-acquisition per Exhibit 21 | 221 |
| Approved Enterprise / PTE status under Israeli tax law | [pre-2020] confirmed only — “Approved Enterprise” status under Israeli Investment Law referenced in 20-F filings (2013–2016); post-acquisition status not disclosed |
213 |
| Beneficially owned / controlled by Israeli capital (current) | Not confirmed — Post-acquisition, SodaStream is wholly owned by PepsiCo Inc. (US); no Israeli sovereign or institutional capital in ownership chain | 121 |
| Israeli-origin brand identity | Confirmed — Brand and company identity explicitly Israeli-origin; Israel Export Institute flagship designation | 720 |
Summary: Three factors confirmed active (Israeli founding, Israeli operational HQ, Israeli tax residency of operating entity); one factor ([pre-2020] only — Israeli capital control) no longer applicable post-2018 acquisition; one factor unconfirmed for post-2018 period (Approved Enterprise / PTE status); Israeli-origin brand identity confirmed throughout.
Israeli government grants: The Negev Development Authority and the Israeli Ministry of Economy are documented in Israeli and international press as having provided financial incentives and grants to facilitate SodaStream’s relocation from Mishor Adumim (West Bank) to Lehavim (Negev) in 2015 9. The exact monetary value of these grants is not fully confirmed in granular public records — this constitutes an identified evidence gap — though Israeli press reported the government as an active facilitating party in the relocation 9.
Netanyahu attendance: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attended the inauguration ceremony of the Lehavim factory in October 2015, which was widely covered in Israeli media 9. This reflects political and symbolic state endorsement of the relocation, not a formal equity or governance stake.
No state ownership stake in SodaStream has been identified. SodaStream was a publicly and then privately held company, and subsequently a PepsiCo subsidiary; no Israeli government ministry or sovereign fund holds a disclosed equity position 23.
No government board appointees, golden shares, or critical infrastructure designations have been identified in public corporate governance records. No public evidence identified for formal state governance mechanisms in SEC 20-F filings (2013–2017) or PepsiCo 10-K filings (2019–2023).
Israel Export Institute: The Institute cited SodaStream as a prominent Israeli export success story and consumer goods brand in promotional publications circa 2012–2014, reflecting the company’s status as a flagship Israeli industrial export — though this is a promotional designation rather than a formal regulatory or legal instrument 7.
UN Global Compact: PepsiCo is a signatory to the UN Global Compact, committing to human rights, labour, environmental, and anti-corruption principles, which applies across its subsidiary operations including SodaStream 17. No specific UN Global Compact communication on progress related to SodaStream’s historical West Bank operations has been separately identified in public records.
Daniel Birnbaum (CEO, SodaStream, c. 2007–2019)
Daniel Birnbaum served as CEO of SodaStream from approximately 2007 through 2019, overseeing the NASDAQ IPO, the West Bank factory controversy, the Mishor Adumim-to-Lehavim relocation, and the PepsiCo acquisition. Following his departure from SodaStream post-acquisition, Birnbaum has been active in Israeli business and social entrepreneurship circles, with public commentary focused on sustainability and social enterprise themes 38. No evidence has been identified in public records of Birnbaum holding material personal investments in OHCHR-listed companies, Israeli arms manufacturers, or settlement-active enterprises. No public evidence identified of personal or family-office investments constituting a material controlling-principal exposure.
Yoav Mehler (Soda-Club founder)
Yoav Mehler is associated with the original Soda-Club company that preceded the modern SodaStream corporate entity. Post-SodaStream, Mehler’s business activities are not prominently documented in major English-language or Israeli business press at a level of granularity sufficient to identify specific investment holdings 37. No public evidence identified of material personal investments in OHCHR-listed companies or settlement-active enterprises.
PepsiCo Controlling Principals (Post-Acquisition)
Post-acquisition, SodaStream’s controlling principal is PepsiCo Inc. (US), a publicly traded company. PepsiCo’s senior leadership are US-domiciled executives of a US multinational. No public evidence has been identified of PepsiCo’s C-suite executives or board members holding material personal or family-office investments in Israeli-specific companies, Israeli settlement enterprises, or OHCHR-listed companies 35. No public evidence identified of controlling-principal exposure at the PepsiCo level.
Strauss Family (Strauss Group JV — Group Attribution)
The Strauss Group, PepsiCo’s Israeli JV partner for snacks, is controlled by the Strauss family (Ofra Strauss as Chair). The Strauss Group has been separately subject to BDS pressure and civil society scrutiny for its Israeli operations, including historical references to donations to the Israeli military 392731. This is a group-attribution finding relevant to PepsiCo’s Israeli joint venture partner, not a direct SodaStream finding.
No public evidence identified of golden shares, founder shares, or charter restrictions tying SodaStream’s operations to Israeli state policy objectives in its SEC 20-F filings or post-acquisition PepsiCo governance documents. Source classes reviewed: SEC 20-F filings (2013–2017), PepsiCo 10-K filings (2019–2023), Dutch corporate registry (post-redomicile).
In SodaStream’s final 20-F filing (2017 fiscal year), Israel was not listed as a standalone material revenue geography. Principal disclosed revenue markets were the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), Scandinavia, Australia, and the United States 23. The company did not separately report Israeli consumer revenue as a material line item in any reviewed filing.
Post-PepsiCo acquisition (2018–present): SodaStream’s financials are consolidated into PepsiCo’s EMEA segment reporting without separate Israeli revenue disclosure 1. PepsiCo’s EMEA segment includes Europe, Middle East, and Africa as a consolidated geography; SodaStream’s financial contribution is described qualitatively in investor presentations as a significant driver of the at-home beverages category within EMEA 34, but is not separately quantified. No public evidence identified of separately disclosed Israeli market revenue in PepsiCo’s segment reporting across 10-K filings reviewed for fiscal years 2019–2023.
Pre-acquisition (through 2018): SodaStream International Ltd. was legally domiciled in the Netherlands but maintained principal operations in Israel. Under this structure, profits were recognised at the Netherlands-domiciled holding entity level, with Israeli operating subsidiary profits subject to Israeli corporate tax before upstream remittance 283. Net profit ultimately accrued to globally dispersed NASDAQ-listed shareholders. The “Approved Enterprise” tax incentive structure applicable [pre-2020] reduced the effective Israeli corporate tax rate on manufacturing income 213.
Post-acquisition (2018–present): SodaStream is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PepsiCo Inc. (US). Profits from SodaStream’s Israeli operations (manufacturing, R&D cost centre allocations) flow upward into PepsiCo’s consolidated US parent financial statements 1. Israel functions as a cost and manufacturing centre rather than a profit-booking domicile under the post-acquisition structure. The post-acquisition status of the Approved Enterprise tax benefit is an identified evidence gap (see Corporate Structure section).
The Israel Export Institute cited SodaStream as a prominent Israeli export success story and consumer goods brand in publications and promotional materials circa 2012–2014, reflecting the company’s role as a flagship Israeli industrial and consumer brand 7.
The Israeli government’s active facilitation of the Lehavim factory relocation — involving the Negev Development Authority, Ministry of Economy incentives, and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s personal attendance at the inauguration — reflects state characterisation of SodaStream as a significant industrial employer and economic anchor in the Negev region 9.
PepsiCo’s 2022 ESG report references its supply chain and human rights commitments across global operations 16; no SodaStream-specific Israeli economic contribution metrics are separately quantified in that document.
The Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territory (A/HRC/55/73, March 2024) addresses corporate responsibilities in the OPT context 36; SodaStream’s operations post-2015 are located within internationally recognised Israeli sovereign territory and are not specifically cited in that report.
No formal public designation of SodaStream as critical infrastructure or as a formally designated “key employer” in a regulatory sense has been identified in post-acquisition public records, though it remains a significant employer in the Negev region.
https://www.pepsico.com/news/press-release/pepsico-completes-acquisition-of-sodastream12052018 ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418819/000141881918000008/0001418819-18-000008-index.htm ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418819/000141881917000007/0001418819-17-000007-index.htm ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sodastream-int-factory-idUSKCN0R61YO20150909 ↩↩↩↩
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/27/sodastream-scarlett-johansson-oxfam-israel ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.ft.com/content/6f8d8c3a-9b3a-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-sodastream-plant-opening/ ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2015/10/sodastream-west-bank-workers-151014100000000.html ↩↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/settlements/database ↩
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-un-companies-idUSKBN2041YJ ↩↩
https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3798234,00.html ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-25905843 ↩
https://bdsmovement.net/sodastream ↩
https://www.pepsico.com/docs/album/esg-topics-policies/pepsico-2022-esg-summary.pdf ↩
https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/334-pepsico ↩
https://www.corporateoccupation.org/corporations/sodastream ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.timesofisrael.com/sodastream-ceo-west-bank-plant-closure/ ↩↩
https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-pepsico-israel-1001299491 ↩
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/77476/000007747624000010/0000077476-24-000010-index.htm ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/2023/11/dont-buy-into-occupation-2023/ ↩
https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/2024/ ↩
https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/4201 ↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/settlements/database ↩↩
https://www.strauss-group.com/investors/reports-and-presentations/ ↩↩↩
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-state-palestine-icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-rejects-state-israel-challenges-admissibility ↩↩
https://investigate.afsc.org/company/pepsico ↩
https://bdsmovement.net/pepsico-sodastream ↩
https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3900000,00.html ↩↩↩
https://www.nbim.no/en/responsible-investment/exclusion-and-observation/ ↩
https://www.pepsico.com/investors/events-and-presentations/investor-day-2022 ↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=PEP&type=10-K ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://undocs.org/A/HRC/55/73 ↩
https://ica.justice.gov.il ↩
https://www.timesofisrael.com/author/daniel-birnbaum ↩
https://www.strauss-group.com/investors/reports-and-presentations/ ↩
https://www.israelbonds.com ↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=PEP&type=10-K ↩
