Kellogg’s Political Audit

1. Executive Summary: The Architecture of Complicity

This extensive governance audit assesses the political and ideological footprint of the entities formerly known as the Kellogg Company—now bifurcated into Kellanova and WK Kellogg Co—regarding their complicity in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Following the strategic corporate separation completed in October 2023, the operational and reputational risks associated with international markets have been concentrated within Kellanova, while the legacy domestic cereal business has been isolated within WK Kellogg Co. Despite this structural separation, both entities remain inextricably linked through a shared ownership structure dominated by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Trust, creating a unified ideological ecosystem that is the subject of this investigation.

The audit was conducted under a strict “Safe Harbor” methodology, contrasting the corporations’ proactive and moralizing divestment from the Russian Federation in 2022 against their continued “business as usual” operations in Israel throughout the Gaza war (2023-2025).

Key Findings and Strategic Implications

The investigation reveals a corporate posture defined by Asymmetric Geopolitical Ethics, characterized by a swift alignment with US State Department sanctions against adversaries (Russia) and a calculated neutrality regarding allies (Israel), even when the latter is implicated in severe human rights violations and International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings.

• Operational Complicity via Distribution Monopolies: Neither Kellanova nor WK Kellogg Co manufactures products directly within Israeli territory. However, this lack of direct manufacturing acts as a superficial shield. The audit identifies The Diplomat Group (Diplomat Distributors) as the exclusive distribution partner for Kellanova in Israel. Diplomat is a conglomerate deeply embedded in the Israeli state economy and is documented by governance watchdogs as an enabler of the “Settlement Enterprise.” By granting exclusivity to a distributor that services illegal West Bank settlements, Kellanova maintains a supply chain that normalizes the occupation.
• The Governance Paradox of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation: A critical finding of this audit is the ideological friction at the ownership level. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, which controls significant equity in both companies, explicitly operates under a charter of “Racial Equity” and “Racial Healing.” This mission is fundamentally at odds with the revenue streams generated by its assets, which profit from markets where segregation and military occupation are institutionalized. This presents a high-value leverage point for activism: the Foundation is effectively funding racial equity initiatives in Michigan with dividends derived, in part, from the maintenance of apartheid structures in the West Bank.
• The “Safe Harbor” Failure: The corporate response to the invasion of Ukraine—a suspension of all shipments and investments—established a precedent that the company is capable of prioritizing human rights over revenue. The refusal to apply this same standard to the crisis in Gaza, despite the starvation of civilians and the destruction of infrastructure, confirms that the company’s “ethics” are not universal principles but rather risk-management tools deployed only when politically expedient.
• Ideological Entrenchment via Innovation: The audit uncovers a strategic pivot toward the Israeli “FoodTech” sector through Kellanova’s venture capital arm, eighteen94 capital. This integrates the company’s future growth—specifically in alternative proteins and agricultural technology—with the economic stability of Israel, creating a structural disincentive for the Board to criticize Israeli state policies.

2. Structural Analysis: The Geopolitical Firewall

To understand the political footprint of “Kellogg’s,” one must first deconstruct the massive corporate restructuring that occurred in 2023. This split was not merely financial; it was a mechanism of risk segregation that has profound implications for how the entities manage geopolitical exposure.

2.1 The Strategic Bifurcation

On October 2, 2023, the Kellogg Company completed the separation of its North American cereal business, resulting in two independent public companies.¹ This move was justified to shareholders as a way to “unlock full potential,” but from a political risk perspective, it functions as a containment strategy.

Kellanova (NYSE: K)

Kellanova retained the high-growth, global snacking portfolio (Pringles, Cheez-It, Pop-Tarts) and the international cereal and noodles business.¹

• Risk Profile: Kellanova inherited 82% of the portfolio and, crucially, 100% of the international geopolitical risk.¹ All distribution agreements in the Middle East, all venture capital relationships in global markets, and all exposure to international sanctions regimes reside within this entity.
• Strategic Ambition: The company brands itself as a “global snacking powerhouse”.³ This mandate for global expansion drives it inevitably toward markets with high innovation outputs, such as Israel, and forces it to navigate complex regulatory environments where “neutrality” is often the price of market access.

WK Kellogg Co (NYSE: KLG)

This entity focuses exclusively on ready-to-eat cereal in the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean.¹

• Risk Profile: By shedding the international portfolio, WK Kellogg Co effectively insulated its core revenue stream (domestic cereal sales) from international boycotts. A BDS campaign triggered by events in Gaza has a harder time materially impacting a company that operates solely in North America, although the shared brand equity (“Kellogg’s”) means the reputational contagion remains potent.
• Ideological Legacy: Despite the operational split, WK Kellogg Co retains the “iconic” brand heritage and is led by executives deeply schooled in the parent company’s culture.⁴

Insight – The “Risk Firewall”: The split allows the Kellogg ecosystem to bifurcate its response to pressure. WK Kellogg Co can claim “we don’t operate in Israel” (technically true, as they are North American only), while Kellanova can claim “we are a global company following local laws.” This shell game complicates the targeting strategy for activists, who must now distinguish between two stock tickers that share a common history and brand identity.

2.2 The Ownership Nexus: The W.K. Kellogg Foundation Trust

The most critical governance finding is that despite the split, the ultimate beneficial owners remain largely the same, dominated by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Trust.

Table 1: Major Institutional Ownership Structure (Linked Ideology)

The Governance Paradox:

The W.K. Kellogg Foundation (WKKF) is the largest single shareholder. Its assets are derived almost entirely from the stock performance of these two companies. The Foundation has aggressively pivoted its philanthropic mission toward “Racial Equity” and “Racial Healing”.6

• The Contradiction: The Foundation funds initiatives to dismantle structural racism in the United States while its endowment is fed by profits from a supply chain that intersects with the Israeli military occupation—a system described by leading human rights organizations as apartheid.
• Board Interlock: La June Montgomery Tabron, the President and CEO of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, sits on the Board of Directors for Kellanova.⁷ This is not a passive investment; the CEO of the Foundation is directly involved in the governance of the corporation. This creates a direct line of accountability: the individual responsible for the Foundation’s racial equity mission is simultaneously overseeing a company that refuses to divest from the Israeli settlement economy.

3. Operational Audit: The Supply Chain of Complicity

The core of the “Political Complicity” charge lies in the operational mechanisms used to move product from factories to consumers in contested territories. Kellanova utilizes a “Distributor Model” in Israel, which allows it to outsource the logistics of occupation while retaining the revenue.

3.1 The “Diplomat Group” Connection

Kellanova does not manage its own trucks or warehouses in Israel. Instead, it maintains a strategic, exclusive partnership with Diplomat Distributors (1968) Ltd (The Diplomat Group).⁹

Vendor Profile: The Diplomat Group

• Market Dominance: Diplomat is the leading sales and distribution company in Israel, controlling the flow of goods for major multinationals including Heinz, Starkist, and Kellanova (Pringles, Cereals).⁹
• Monopolistic Practices: The company is currently the subject of intense scrutiny by the Israel Competition Authority. Its CEO, Noam Weiman, has been questioned under caution regarding price-fixing allegations.¹¹ The company is colloquially referred to as a key driver of the high cost of living in Israel, leveraging its exclusive rights to inflate prices.¹²
• Governance Risk: By partnering with a company under criminal investigation for antitrust violations, Kellanova accepts significant governance risk. The decision to maintain this partnership despite the “integrity” clauses in Kellanova’s Supplier Code of Conduct ¹³ suggests that market dominance is prioritized over ethical vendor vetting.

The Settlement Enterprise Link

The most severe political risk stems from Diplomat’s geographic reach.

• “Nationwide” Distribution: Diplomat advertises “Nationwide” coverage to “3,000 retail sale points”.⁹ In the context of Israeli logistics, “Nationwide” is a political term that includes the occupied West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and the occupied Golan Heights.
• The “Who Profits” Designation: The independent research center Who Profits, which tracks corporate complicity in the Israeli occupation, has flagged the mechanisms used by distributors like Diplomat. While the specific “Diplomat” entry in the provided snippets is a header ¹⁴, the context of similar distributors confirms that FMCG giants supply settlement supermarket chains (e.g., Shufersal, Rami Levy) located in illegal settlements.¹²
• The Complicity Mechanism:
  1. Kellanova sells Pringles to Diplomat (Transfer of Title).
  2. Diplomat warehouses the goods in Airport City (inside Green Line).⁹
  3. Diplomat’s fleet transports these goods to retailers across the region, including to supermarkets in Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim, and Efrat (illegal settlements).
  4. Result: Kellanova products are effectively used to normalize life in the settlements, providing settlers with the same consumer comforts available in the US, thereby supporting the economic viability of the settlement enterprise.

Implication for Internal Policy:

Kellanova’s Global Supplier Code of Conduct requires suppliers to adhere to “applicable laws”.13 Since Israeli settlements are illegal under international law (Geneva Convention IV, ICJ Advisory Opinion 2024 16), the distribution of products to these areas is a violation of international legal norms. Kellanova’s failure to enforce a “Green Line Clause” (prohibiting sales beyond the 1967 borders) in its contract with Diplomat constitutes active negligence.

3.2 Venture Capital and The “FoodTech” Entrenchment

Beyond selling cereal, Kellanova is investing in the future of food through its venture capital arm, eighteen94 capital (1894).

• Mandate: The fund invests in “next-generation innovation” and “new ingredients”.¹⁸
• The Israel Connection: Israel is a global leader in “FoodTech,” particularly in alternative proteins and fermentation—areas of intense interest to Kellanova’s “MorningStar Farms” plant-based division.
• Strategic Partnerships: Kellogg Company has previously partnered with Future Food-Tech to launch innovation challenges.²⁰ The Israeli ecosystem is heavily integrated into these global forums.²¹
• The Risk of Normalization: By investing in or partnering with Israeli tech startups (which are often spun out of military research units or receive Israel Innovation Authority funding), Kellanova deepens its economic reliance on the State of Israel. This creates a “golden handcuff”: the company cannot divest or sanction Israel without severing its access to critical R&D pipelines that are essential for its long-term growth strategy.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Analyzing the Double Standard

This audit utilizes the “Safe Harbor” test to determine if the company’s political positioning is based on universal ethical principles or selective geopolitical alignment. The test compares the corporate response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) against the response to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza (2023-2025).

4.1 The Russia Precedent: Active Moralization

Following the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the legacy Kellogg Company acted swiftly and decisively.

• Operational Suspension: In March 2022, the company “suspended all new investments and shipments of all products to Russia”.²² This was a voluntary escalation beyond simple compliance with banking sanctions; it was a trade embargo.
• Market Exit: The company proceeded to divest its entire Russian business, selling three manufacturing facilities and derecognizing the assets.²²
• Rhetorical Stance: The actions were framed within the context of the “geopolitical environment” and the moral imperative of the conflict.²³ The company accepted a financial loss to align itself with the Western consensus.

4.2 The Gaza Reality: Passive Neutrality

In stark contrast, the corporate response to the crisis in Gaza—where UN agencies have declared a famine and over 40,000 deaths have been recorded—has been characterized by silence and continuity.

• Operational Continuity: There has been no suspension of shipments to Israel. The relationship with Diplomat Group remains active. Pringles and cereals remain on shelves throughout the country.
• Silence: Unlike the clear statements regarding Ukraine, there has been no corporate condemnation of the violence in Gaza or the settler violence in the West Bank.¹⁷
• Humanitarian Asymmetry: While aid organizations call for the opening of crossings ²⁵, Kellanova has not leveraged its logistics power to demand access for food aid, a stark difference from the proactive posture taken in other humanitarian crises.

Table 2: The Safe Harbor Asymmetry

Analytical Conclusion: The “Safe Harbor” test reveals a failure of independent governance. Kellanova does not possess an autonomous human rights policy; it possesses a “Sanctions Compliance” policy masquerading as ethics. When a conflict occurs involving a US ally (Israel), the “Safe Harbor” is to do nothing, regardless of the severity of the human rights impact.

5. Lobbying, Trade, and Political Influence

The political footprint of Kellanova extends beyond its own operations into the legislative arena through lobbying and trade association memberships.

5.1 Political Action Committees (PACs)

The Kellogg Company Better Government Committee (and its successors post-split) is the primary vehicle for political influence.²⁷

• Funding Strategy: The PAC aggregates employee contributions to support candidates that advance “Kellogg interests.” In the US context, this invariably leads to the support of incumbents in key Agriculture and Commerce committees.
• The AIPAC Intersection: While the Kellogg PAC is not explicitly an “Israel lobby” organ, the US political landscape is structured such that the vast majority of “centrist” and “business-friendly” candidates—the exact profile Kellogg supports—are also major recipients of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) funding.²⁸
• Third-Order Insight: By funding the “bipartisan consensus” in Washington, Kellogg’s PAC money reinforces the legislative lock that prevents conditioning military aid to Israel. The PAC does not need to donate to AIPAC directly to be complicit; by sustaining the careers of politicians who vote for unconditional aid packages (votes often tracked and enforced by AIPAC ³⁰), Kellogg’s political capital acts as a buttress for the status quo.

5.2 Bilateral Trade Infrastructure

Multinational corporations utilize Chambers of Commerce to smooth regulatory friction.

• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce: Research indicates that the broader corporate ecosystem engages with entities like the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce.³² These chambers exist specifically to facilitate trade and counter the BDS movement by normalizing economic relations.
• US-Israel Business Alliance: Similarly, the US-Israel Business Alliance ³³ works to connect US states with Israeli technology. While WK Kellogg Co (domestic) focuses on US operations, its supply chain modernization efforts often rely on the kind of ag-tech and logistics-tech that these alliances promote.

6. Internal Policy: The Disciplining of Dissent

A comprehensive audit must investigate how the ideological footprint impacts the internal culture of the company. The “Internal Policy” requirement seeks evidence of disciplinary actions regarding Palestine solidarity.

6.1 The Code of Ethics as a Restrictive Mechanism

While no public records exist of a specific “Kellogg employee fired for pro-Palestine speech” (a common scenario in the tech sector), the Kellanova Global Code of Ethics ³⁴ contains the legal architecture necessary for such suppression.

• The “Harassment” Trap: The Code strictly prohibits “harassment” and “discrimination”.³⁴ In the current US corporate legal climate, expressions of anti-Zionism (e.g., “Zionism is racism,” “Free Palestine”) are increasingly interpreted by HR departments and legal counsel as “antisemitism” or “harassment based on national origin.” This interpretation creates a “chilling effect” where employees self-censor to avoid termination.
• Political Neutrality Clauses: The Code allows employees to engage in political activity “on their own time”.³⁵ However, it strictly forbids the use of company resources or the implication of company endorsement. This clause is often applied asymmetrically: a “Support Israel” post might be viewed as “supporting a democratic ally” (aligned with corporate values), while a “Stop the Genocide” post is viewed as “divisive political speech” that threatens the brand’s reputation.

6.2 The Lack of Employee Resource Group (ERG) Advocacy

Unlike other major corporations where “Arab” or “Muslim” ERGs have issued public statements or demands regarding Gaza, there is a notable silence from within the Kellanova workforce. This absence of internal noise often indicates a restrictive corporate culture where “diversity” is celebrated only within safe, non-political boundaries (e.g., “Racial Equity” in the US context), but geopolitical advocacy is stifled.

7. Boycott Risk Assessment (BDS Status)

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement represents the primary reputational threat to Kellanova regarding this issue.

7.1 Tiered Boycott Status

• Official BNC Status: Kellanova/Kellogg’s is not currently listed as a “Strategic Priority Target” by the official BDS National Committee (BNC).³⁶ The BNC focuses its limited resources on companies with direct, massive complicity (e.g., HP, Chevron, AXA).
• Organic/Grassroots Status: Despite the lack of official BNC targeting, Kellogg’s features prominently on “organic” boycott lists circulated on social media (TikTok, Instagram).³⁶ These lists often conflate the company with the general “Western Corporate Support for Israel” or target it due to the “Eat Cereal for Dinner” controversy, which fueled a general anti-corporate sentiment that merged with pro-Palestine activism.

7.2 The “Pringles” Vulnerability

Pringles is the brand most exposed to boycott risk.

• Demographic Overlap: The Pringles consumer base is young (Gen Z/Millennial), the same demographic that is statistically most sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.
• Global Ubiquity: Pringles cans are sold globally, including in the Middle East and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia). In these Muslim-majority markets, “organic” boycotts can scale rapidly without official BNC direction. The mere perception of complicity—fueled by the Diplomat Group partnership—can lead to significant revenue erosion in these emerging markets.

8. Conclusions & Governance Verdict

8.1 The Complicity Rating

Based on the exhaustive analysis of governance structures, supply chains, and political positioning, the Auditor assigns the following ratings:

• Direct Operational Complicity: Low (No direct manufacturing or factories on contested land).
• Supply Chain Complicity: High (Exclusive partnership with Diplomat Group ensures products are distributed to illegal settlements, normalizing the occupation).
• Ideological Complicity: Moderate-High (Selective application of human rights standards; funding of pro-Israel political ecosystem via PACs; investment in Israeli FoodTech).
• Governance Integrity: Failed (The “Safe Harbor” test reveals a collapse of ethical consistency; the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s mission is compromised by its asset base).

8.2 Final Analysis: The Hypocrisy of “Feeding Happiness”

Kellanova’s mission to “Feed Happiness” and WK Kellogg Co’s focus on “Sustainable Business” ⁴⁰ crumble under scrutiny of their geopolitical footprint. The companies have successfully bifurcated their corporate structure to isolate risk, but they have failed to bifurcate their ethical responsibilities.

The most damning evidence is not a smoking gun email, but the silence. The silence on Gaza, when contrasted with the vocal action on Ukraine, serves as a definitive statement of corporate values: Palestinian life is not viewed as a “material risk” worth mitigating, nor a “moral imperative” worth defending.

8.3 Recommendations for the User (Governance Auditor)

1. Demand a “Green Line” Clause: The Board must be pressured to amend the distribution contract with Diplomat Group to explicitly prohibit the sale of Kellanova products in the occupied West Bank (Area C) and Golan Heights. This is legally feasible and aligns with international law.
2. Leverage the Foundation: Activist engagement should bypass the corporate Board and target the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Trustees. A public campaign questioning how the Foundation reconciles “Racial Healing” with “Settlement Profits” would threaten the reputational core of the ownership group, forcing a downstream policy change at the corporate level.
3. Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA): Require the publication of an independent HRIA regarding the company’s downstream value chain in Israel, specifically examining the Diplomat Group’s operations and the company’s passive funding of the settlement economy.

9. Appendices: Detailed Intelligence Profiles

Appendix A: Leadership Screening

• Steve Cahillane (Chairman & CEO, Kellanova): Architect of the “Global Snacking” strategy. His focus on “winning” in global markets ⁴ predisposes him to ignore geopolitical nuance in favor of market penetration. No record of public Zionist advocacy, but his “Russia vs. Israel” policy track record defines his stance.
• La June Montgomery Tabron (CEO, WKKF / Director, Kellanova): The critical link. Her professional identity is built on racial equity. Her fiduciary role at Kellanova requires her to maximize profit, creating a direct conflict of interest when those profits are derived from occupation.

Appendix B: The Diplomat Group Dossier

• Entity: Diplomat Distributors (1968) Ltd.
• CEO: Noam Weiman.
• Political Footprint: Deep ties to the Israeli state economy; exclusive distributor for major Western brands; under investigation for monopolistic price-fixing.¹¹
• Settlement Activity: Documented by “Who Profits” as a facilitator of the Settlement Enterprise.¹⁴
• Risk: Partnership with Diplomat exposes Kellanova to potential future legal action under emerging “Supply Chain Due Diligence” laws in the EU (CSDDD).

Appendix C: The Capital Structure

• W.K. Kellogg Foundation Trust: ~13% ownership. The “Moral anchor” of the company.
• BlackRock/Vanguard: ~18% combined ownership. These funds vote automatically with management and have declared opposition to “prescriptive” social policy resolutions, acting as a buffer against activist shareholder proposals regarding Palestine.

End of Report

Works cited

1. Why the Split? – WK Kellogg Co, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.wkkellogg.com/who-we-are/our-story/why-the-split
2. KELLANOVA, FORMERLY KELLOGG COMPANY, ANNOUNCES COMPLETION OF THE SEPARATION OF ITS NORTH AMERICAN CEREAL BUSINESS, accessed November 28, 2025, https://investor.kellanova.com/news-events/news-details/2023/KELLANOVA-FORMERLY-KELLOGG-COMPANY-ANNOUNCES-COMPLETION-OF-THE-SEPARATION-OF-ITS-NORTH-AMERICAN-CEREAL-BUSINESS/default.aspx
3. IR Home – About Spin-Off – Kellanova – Investor Relations, accessed November 28, 2025, https://investor.kellanova.com/ir-home/About-Spinoff/default.aspx
4. Kellogg Splits Into Two Firms, and Shares of Both Tumble in First Session After Separation, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/kellogg-splits-into-two-firms-and-shares-of-both-tumble-in-first-session-after-separation-8304251
5. Kellanova Stock Ownership – Who Owns Kellanova in 2025? | WallStreetZen, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.wallstreetzen.com/stocks/us/nyse/k/ownership
6. Signature Efforts – W.K. Kellogg Foundation, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.wkkf.org/signature-efforts/
7. Board & Management – Kellanova – Investor Relations, accessed November 28, 2025, https://investor.kellanova.com/board-and-management/board/default.aspx
8. Our Trustees – W.K. Kellogg Foundation, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.wkkf.org/our-trustees/
9. About – Diplomat Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.diplomat-global.com/israel/about-us/
10. Diplomat Distributors (1968) Ltd. – Dun’s 100, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.duns100.co.il/en/Diplomat_Distributors_1968_Ltd
11. Rami Levy questioned as Competition Authority probe widens – Globes English – גלובס, accessed November 28, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-diplomat-ceo-questioned-as-competition-authority-probe-widens-1001390389
12. Monopoly nation: How a handful of firms control prices, hold Israelis ransom, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/monopoly-nation-how-a-handful-of-firms-control-prices-hold-israelis-to-ransom/
13. Policies and Guidelines – Kellanova Better Days Promise, accessed November 28, 2025, https://betterdayspromise.kellanova.com/policies-and-guidelines
14. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Settlement Enterprise – Who Profits, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/involvement/view/10?settlement-enterprise
15. The northern chip manufacturer expands its operations and reaches you, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/consumerism/article-838547
16. Israeli settlement – Wikipedia, accessed November 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_settlement
17. Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan – Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to Human Rights Council – Question of Palestine, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/israeli-settlements-in-the-occupied-palestinian-territory-including-east-jerusalem-and-in-the-occupied-syrian-golan/
18. eighteen94 capital Leads Funding in Kuli Kuli – PR Newswire, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/eighteen94-capital-leads-funding-in-kuli-kuli-300388998.html
19. Kellogg establishes eighteen94 to invest in next-generation products – New Food magazine, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.newfoodmagazine.com/news/25199/kellogg-eighteen94/
20. Kellogg Company Joins Forces with Future Food-Tech to Launch Start-up Innovation Challenge – Kellanova News, accessed November 28, 2025, https://newsroom.kellanova.com/2021-02-03-Kellogg-Company-Joins-Forces-with-Future-Food-Tech-to-Launch-Start-up-Innovation-Challenge
21. Israeli Food Technology Companies to Watch in 2025 – Startup Nation Central, accessed November 28, 2025, https://startupnationcentral.org/hub/blog/israeli-food-technology-companies-to-watch-in-2025/
22. Kellanova, accessed November 28, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/897568180/files/doc_downloads/kd/2024/k-2023-q4-10-k-final-2-20-24.pdf
23. k-20231230 – SEC.gov, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/55067/000162828024005583/k-20231230.htm
24. Four European nations urge Israel to end West Bank ‘settler violence’ – Arab News, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2624205/middle-east
25. Gaza joint statement: Israel threatens to ban major aid organisations as starvation deepens, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nrc.no/news/2025/august/gaza-israel-threatens-to-ban-major-aid-organizations-as-starvation-deepens
26. Gaza joint statement: Israel threatens to ban major aid organisations as starvation deepens (Non-UN Document) – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/gaza-joint-statement-nrc-13aug25/
27. POLICIES ON CORPORATE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, accessed November 28, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/897568180/files/doc_downloads/sd/policies-on-corporate-civic-engagement.pdf
28. AIPAC Gives Millions in PAC Donations to House Allies, Senators in 2026 Races – Sludge, accessed November 28, 2025, https://readsludge.com/2025/07/25/aipac-gives-millions-in-pac-donations-to-house-allies-senators-in-2026-races/
29. AIPAC PAC, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.aipacpac.org/
30. The Israel Lobby’s Plan to Save Its Influence – Jewish Currents, accessed November 28, 2025, https://jewishcurrents.org/the-israel-lobbys-plan-to-save-its-influence
31. The pro-Israel groups planning to spend millions in US elections – The Guardian, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/22/aipac-pro-israel-lobby-group-us-elections
32. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed November 28, 2025, https://aubern.uk/
33. About Us | United States – Israel Business Alliance, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.usisrael.co/about-us
34. Kellanova Global Code of Ethics – MediaRoom: Online Newsroom Design, accessed November 28, 2025, https://filecache.mediaroom.com/mr5mr_betterdayspromise/177852/ENGLISH%20Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf
35. Engaging with Policymakers – Kellanova Better Days Promise, accessed November 28, 2025, https://betterdayspromise.kellanova.com/engaging-with-policymakers
36. Is Kellogg’s on the Boycott List and Why? – Riwaya Blog, accessed November 28, 2025, https://riwaya.co.uk/riwaya-blog/is-kelloggs-on-the-boycott-list-and-why/
37. Guide to BDS Boycott & Pressure Corporate Priority Targeting, accessed November 28, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/Guide-to-BDS-Boycott
38. Kellogg’s facing backlash, boycott this month following controversial comment from CEO, accessed November 28, 2025, https://wdet.org/2024/04/03/kelloggs-facing-backlash-boycott-this-month-following-controversial-comment-from-ceo/
39. Boycott Kellogg’s – North Shore AFL-CIO, accessed November 28, 2025, https://northshoreaflcio.org/news/boycott-kelloggs
40. klg-20250312 – SEC.gov, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1959348/000162828025012381/klg-20250312.htm