Airbnb

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Airbnb, Inc.

Jurisdiction: United States (Delaware/San Francisco); Significant Operational Subsidiary: Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd (Tel Aviv).

Sector: Technology / Hospitality / Platform Economy / Online Travel Agency (OTA)

Leadership: Brian Chesky (CEO), Nathan Blecharczyk (CSO), Joe Gebbia (Director).

Intelligence Conclusions:

The forensic audit of Airbnb, Inc. reveals a corporate entity that has transitioned from a passive digital intermediary to an active, structural participant in the maintenance and legitimization of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. While the company markets an ethos of “belonging anywhere,” detailed analysis of its operational footprint, digital supply chain, and governance decisions indicates a material complicity in violations of international humanitarian law, specifically the monetization of war crimes and the logistical sustainment of military infrastructure.

Our investigation establishes that Airbnb functions as a “Digital Quartermaster” for the settlement enterprise. The platform maintains a persistent inventory of approximately 300 active listings in illegal settlements across the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), including verified listings in militarized outposts and zones prohibited to the protected Palestinian population.¹ This is not merely a passive reflection of market demand; it is an active commercial choice to monetize land seizure. The company collects service fees from these transactions and, crucially, acts as a tax collection agent for the Israeli government, remitting Value Added Tax (VAT) and generating fiscal revenue for the state from activities conducted on occupied land.³ This creates a direct financial feedback loop between the company’s global platform and the treasury of the occupying power.

Furthermore, the audit uncovers a “Dual-Use” operational reality where the platform has been integrated into the logistical apparatus of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). Forensic review of listings has identified properties, such as the “Gordon 2 Social Space Hotel,” which explicitly advertise themselves as housing solutions “for soldiers only,” actively billeting reservists and active-duty personnel during periods of mobilization.⁴ This moves the company beyond the sphere of civilian commerce and into the realm of direct service provision to military combatants.

Ideologically and politically, Airbnb demonstrates a state of “Governance Capture.” The company’s 2019 reversal of its decision to de-list settlement properties—following a coordinated campaign of “Lawfare” and threats of state-level sanctions from US entities—evidences a corporate governance structure that prioritizes political expediency and market access over adherence to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.⁶ This capitulation is reinforced by a Board of Directors heavily influenced by Venture Capital firms (Sequoia, Andreessen Horowitz) with deep, structural investment ties to the Israeli technology and security sectors.⁶ The company’s digital infrastructure itself relies on “Unit 8200” lineage vendors (Check Point, Au10tix) for security and identity verification, effectively importing the logic of the Israeli security checkpoint into its global user management systems.⁹

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

Airbnb was founded in 2008 in San Francisco by Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia, and Nathan Blecharczyk.¹¹ The company’s genesis story is rooted in the “sharing economy,” initially capitalized through scrappy means such as the sale of novelty cereal boxes. However, the trajectory of the company was fundamentally altered by its acceptance into Y Combinator (Winter 2009 batch) and subsequent backing by Sequoia Capital.¹²

This early integration into the elite tier of Silicon Valley Venture Capital provided more than just funding; it embedded Airbnb into a specific technocratic ecosystem that views Israel not as a conflict zone, but as a critical “Startup Nation” node. Sequoia Capital, one of Airbnb’s earliest and most influential backers, has a storied history of deep integration with the Israeli defense-tech sector, famously incubating companies founded by alumni of Unit 8200 (Israel’s signals intelligence agency), such as Adallom and Wiz.⁸ This structural relationship created a pipeline for Israeli technology to be integrated into Airbnb’s stack and established a fiduciary culture where the Israeli market is viewed as a strategic asset to be protected at all costs.

Assessment:

The founders’ reliance on this specific capital network created a path dependence. While Chesky, Gebbia, and Blecharczyk may not have ideological origins in Zionism, their capitalization strategy necessitated an alignment with investors for whom the security and economic viability of Israel are paramount. This explains the company’s permeability to Israeli “soft power” initiatives and its rapid integration of Israeli cyber-technologies. The Y Combinator connection specifically links Airbnb to Guesty, an Israeli property management startup also birthed from YC, which has become the technological backbone for professional hosts in the settlements.13

Leadership & Ownership

• Brian Chesky (CEO, Co-Founder, Chairman): As the primary architect of the company’s vision, Chesky has cultivated a public persona centered on humanitarianism and “trust.” However, his operational track record reveals a pragmatic willingness to compromise these values when threatened by state power. His personal involvement in the 2019 settlement policy reversal—capitulating to pressure from the Israeli Ministry of Tourism and US anti-BDS governors—demonstrates that his leadership is susceptible to coercion.⁶ His contrasting “Total War” response to the invasion of Ukraine versus his “neutrality” on Gaza highlights a geopolitical alignment with US foreign policy rather than a consistent human rights framework.⁶
• Joe Gebbia (Co-Founder, Director): Gebbia’s recent trajectory suggests a shift toward the political right. His association with the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) and alignment with political figures hostile to the BDS movement suggests a governance influence that actively resists “political” divestment.¹¹ This creates a powerful internal counterweight to any employee activism regarding Palestinian rights.
• Nathan Blecharczyk (CSO, Co-Founder): As Chief Strategy Officer, Blecharczyk oversees the “City Portal” and data integration with municipalities.¹⁵ In the context of Israel, this role is critical. The “City Portal” technology, if deployed in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, likely shares data with Israeli authorities that facilitates the monitoring of the rental market, including in occupied East Jerusalem. His oversight of the “Trust” infrastructure also implicates him in the procurement of Israeli surveillance tech like Au10tix.
• Shareholders: The company is widely held by major institutional investors including Vanguard (5.31%), Fidelity (5.05%), and BlackRock (2.91%).¹⁶ Crucially, the shareholder registry has historically included significant Israeli institutional investors such as Altshuler Shaham and Psagot Investment House.³ Psagot is a financial pillar of the settlement movement, providing mortgages for construction on occupied land. This creates a circular economy: Israeli finance builds the settlement, Airbnb monetizes it, and Israeli investment houses reap the dividends from Airbnb’s stock performance.

Analytical Assessment:

The corporate structure of Airbnb is characterized by a “Dual-Jurisdiction” vulnerability. Unlike a purely US-based tech firm, Airbnb operates a substantial, tax-paying subsidiary in Tel Aviv: Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd.³ This entity is not a shell; it is an operational node involved in R&D and market management. The existence of this subsidiary subjects Airbnb to the full coercive power of the Israeli state. Under Israel’s anti-boycott laws, any move by the parent company to de-list settlements could trigger severe legal and financial retaliation against the local subsidiary, including the revocation of visas, tax investigations, and civil lawsuits. The leadership’s decision to maintain this subsidiary effectively holds the parent company hostage to Israeli domestic policy. Furthermore, the board’s composition, heavily weighted with VC figures like Jeffrey Jordan (Andreessen Horowitz) and Alfred Lin (Sequoia) ¹¹, ensures that the boardroom remains an echo chamber for the “Constructive Engagement” narrative, which argues for economic integration with Israel regardless of the occupation.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

The following timeline reconstructs the trajectory of Airbnb’s entanglement with the Israeli occupation, highlighting the shift from passive listing to active political capitulation.

Date	Event	Significance
Aug 2008	Airbnb Founded.	Launch of the platform in San Francisco.11
Dec 2013	Founding of Guesty (Tel Aviv).	Israeli startup Guesty, founded by Amiad and Koby Soto, launches. As a fellow Y Combinator alumnus, Guesty becomes the “Operating System” for professional hosts, including those in settlements, streamlining the management of illegal listings.13
Jan 2016	HRW Report Released.	Human Rights Watch publishes “Bed and Breakfast on Stolen Land,” formally identifying Airbnb as a facilitator of the settlement economy and initiating global scrutiny.19
Nov 19, 2018	Announcement of Settlement Ban.	In a landmark decision, Airbnb announces it will remove ~200 listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, citing their contribution to “existing human suffering” and the core of the conflict.20
Nov 28, 2018	Filing of Silber et al. v. Airbnb.	A group of US-based settlers and dual citizens files a class-action lawsuit in Delaware Federal Court, alleging religious discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.20
Dec 2018	Israeli Gov Threatens Sanctions.	Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan calls on US states to activate anti-BDS laws against Airbnb. Tourism Minister Yariv Levin threatens a punitive “special tax” on Airbnb’s Israel operations.23
Jan 2019	Texas & Florida Action.	Complying with Israeli requests, the Texas Comptroller and Florida Governor move to place Airbnb on “Scrutinized Companies” lists, threatening divestment of state pension funds.3
Mar 18, 2019	Palestinians Attempt Intervention.	Palestinian landowners and the Center for Constitutional Rights file a motion to intervene in the Silber case, arguing that the settlers are trespassing on stolen land.20
Apr 9, 2019	Policy Reversal & Settlement.	Airbnb settles the Silber lawsuit and completely reverses its policy. It announces it will not remove listings in the West Bank and will instead donate “profits” to humanitarian aid.7
Feb 2020	UN Database Listing.	The UN OHCHR releases the database of business enterprises involved in settlement activities. Airbnb is listed for the “provision of services… supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements”.26
Dec 2020	Initial Public Offering (IPO).	Airbnb goes public (NASDAQ: ABNB). The SEC filings notably omit the material risks associated with its UN listing and operations in occupied territory.27
Apr 2021	Acquisition of MyVR by Guesty.	Guesty, the Israeli partner firm, expands significantly, further cementing the technological infrastructure for settlement rentals within the Airbnb ecosystem.28
Feb 2022	Ukraine Response (“Total War”).	In response to the Russian invasion, Airbnb suspends all operations in Russia/Belarus and facilitates massive aid to Ukraine, highlighting a stark double standard compared to the OPT.6
Oct 2023	Post-Oct 7 Mobilization Support.	Following the Hamas attacks, Airbnb activates “Open Homes.” Listings like “Gordon 2” emerge, explicitly housing IDF soldiers and reservists.4
Jun 2024	GLAN Money Laundering Action.	Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) files complaints in UK/Ireland alleging Airbnb is laundering “proceeds of crime” from settlements.30
Dec 2024	Shareholder Proposal Conflict.	The Heritage Foundation and ACVF submit proposals demanding Airbnb resist “politicized divestment” (i.e., protect Israel operations). Airbnb excludes these from proxy materials, triggering a lawsuit.31
Jun 2025	Heritage Foundation Lawsuit.	Heritage sues Airbnb for excluding their proposal, turning the company into a battleground for conservative anti-BDS activism.31

4. Domains of Complicity

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity

Goal: To rigorously establish the extent to which Airbnb provides logistical sustainment, infrastructure, or direct services to the Israeli military apparatus (IDF) and the physical control matrix of the occupation.

Evidence & Analysis:

The investigation identifies a distinct pattern of Dual-Use Logistics where the Airbnb platform, while ostensibly civilian, functions as a decentralized billeting and sustainment system for the military occupation.

• Direct Provision of Barracks Infrastructure (The “Gordon 2” Case): The most damning evidence of direct military complicity is the existence of listings explicitly designated for combatants. Forensic review of the platform identified the “Gordon 2 Social Space Hotel” in Tel Aviv (Listing ID: 1536759357280976579). The listing description is unambiguous: “The ‘Social Space Hotel Gordon 2 – for soldiers only’ hosts soldiers in regular service, reservists on active duty, and is a permanent home for individual soldiers”.⁴
  • Implication: This is not a “tourist” listing; it is a military barracks outsourced to the private sector. By hosting this listing, processing the booking data, and collecting service fees (or even waiving them as a “donation”), Airbnb is acting as a government contractor providing housing for active-duty soldiers during a time of war. This violates the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law, blurring the line between a civilian service and a military objective.
• The Strategic Depth of Settlement Listings: Airbnb maintains approximately 300 active listings in settlements across the West Bank (Area C), such as Ariel, Tekoa, Kfar Adumim, and the E-1 corridor.²
  • Context: Under Israeli military law, these settlements are designated as “Closed Military Zones” or are strategic assets designed to fragment Palestinian territory. Settlements like Ariel are built to project power and disrupt the contiguity of a future Palestinian state.
  • Mechanism: By providing a marketplace for these properties, Airbnb provides the “economic sustainment” required to keep these outposts viable. A settler in Tekoa acts as the civilian vanguard of the military occupation; their presence justifies the deployment of IDF battalions to “protect” them. By ensuring the financial solvency of the settler through tourism revenue, Airbnb directly subsidizes the civilian footprint that necessitates the military footprint. The platform effectively monetizes the “views” of seized land, turning the fruits of military conquest into a tradable commodity.¹
• Surge Capacity During Mobilization (The “Open Homes” Nexus): Following the October 7, 2023 attacks, the IDF mobilized over 300,000 reservists, creating an immediate housing crisis. Airbnb activated its “Open Homes” (Airbnb.org) program. While framed as humanitarian aid for displaced civilians, the lack of distinction in the platform’s vetting allows this infrastructure to be used by reservists seeking housing near their mobilization points.⁵ The “Gordon 2” listing proves that the platform is used for this purpose. In a total war scenario, decentralized housing provided by Airbnb acts as a logistical force multiplier for the IDF Home Front Command, relieving the state of the burden of constructing temporary barracks.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Airbnb claims to be a neutral platform (“passive aggregator”) and that listings like “Gordon 2” are user-generated content that they do not endorse.
• Rebuttal: This argument fails on two counts. First, Airbnb is a curated marketplace. It actively polices listings for “safety” and “discrimination” (e.g., banning hate groups in the US). The retention of “soldiers only” listings is a choice of moderation policy. Second, the systemic nature of the settlement listings (persisting after the 2019 review) proves that supporting the occupation infrastructure is a feature of their business model, not an oversight. The UN OHCHR listing explicitly rejects the “passive” defense, citing the “provision of services” as active complicity.²⁶

Analytical Assessment:

The evidence supports a finding of High military complicity. Airbnb is not merely a travel company in this context; it is a Digital Quartermaster. It provides the essential housing layer that supports both the demographic arm of the occupation (settlers) and, in specific documented instances, the active combatant arm (reservists). The integration is functional and logistical. Without the liquidity provided by Airbnb, the economic cost of maintaining remote settlement outposts would rise, potentially reducing their viability.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Specific data on the volume of “Open Homes” bookings made by individuals with IDF email addresses or military identification since October 2023.
• The extent of any data-sharing agreements with the Israeli Ministry of Defense or Home Front Command regarding housing availability during emergencies.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Entity: Gordon 2 Social Space Hotel ⁴ (Listing).
• Entity: Airbnb.org / Open Homes.⁵
• Location: Tekoa, Ariel, Kfar Adumim (Militarized Settlements).

Domain 2: Digital & Technological Complicity

Goal: To map Airbnb’s reliance on Israeli military-grade technology and its integration into the “Unit 8200” ecosystem, determining if the platform functions as a vector for surveillance.

Evidence & Analysis:

Airbnb’s “Trust Stack”—the critical infrastructure used to verify users, prevent fraud, and secure communications—is built almost entirely on technology procured from the Israeli intelligence sector. This constitutes a “Digital Supply Chain” complicity.

• Au10tix: The Privatization of the Checkpoint: Airbnb utilizes Au10tix for identity verification.³⁵
  • Origin: Au10tix is a subsidiary of ICTS International, the security firm founded by former Shin Bet and El Al security agents responsible for the racial profiling and interrogation systems at Ben Gurion Airport.¹⁰ The founder, Ron Atzmon, served in Unit 8200.¹⁰
  • Mechanism: Au10tix uses “forensic, biometric, and AI technologies” to scan user IDs (passports, driver’s licenses) and perform facial recognition (selfie matching) within “8 seconds”.³⁸
  • Implication: By integrating Au10tix, Airbnb effectively subjects its global user base—including Palestinians and Arabs—to a privatized version of the Israeli security apparatus. The algorithms used to detect “fraud” or “risk” are derived from the same logic used to profile “hostile” entities at Israeli borders. This creates a digital rights crisis where the data of Airbnb users is processed by a firm with deep, organic ties to the Shin Bet.¹⁰
• Check Point Software Technologies: The Unit 8200 Perimeter: Airbnb secures its corporate email and communications using Check Point’s Harmony/Avanan technology (evidenced by URL wrapping protect.checkpoint.com).⁹
  • Origin: Check Point was founded by Gil Shwed, a veteran of Unit 8200, and is the foundational pillar of the Israeli cyber-defense sector.³⁹
  • Implication: This integration grants an Israeli defense-linked firm deep visibility into Airbnb’s corporate communications, metadata, and internal workflows. In an espionage context, this is a significant vulnerability, but in a complicity context, it demonstrates Airbnb’s financial support for the R&D of the Israeli cyber-warfare ecosystem.
• Guesty: The Middleware of Occupation: The audit highlights a critical, symbiotic relationship with Guesty, a Property Management Software (PMS) company headquartered in Tel Aviv.⁴⁰
  • The Nexus: Like Airbnb, Guesty is a Y Combinator alumnus (Winter 2014).¹³ It was founded by Amiad and Koby Soto to professionalize hosting.
  • Function: Guesty acts as the “Operating System” for professional hosts, including the large property aggregators operating in West Bank settlements. It automates messaging, calendar syncing, and cleaning coordination.
  • Complicity: Airbnb prioritizes Guesty integration via API. This technological dependency ensures the scalability of the settlement rental market. A settler in Efrat can manage 50 properties using Guesty’s automation, a scale impossible manually. Airbnb’s partnership with Guesty essentially provides the enterprise software required to run a settlement real estate empire efficiently.⁹
• Project Nimbus and Data Sovereignty: Airbnb is a massive consumer of Amazon Web Services (AWS). With the launch of the AWS Tel Aviv Region (il-central-1) as part of “Project Nimbus,” and given Airbnb’s local tax nexus (Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd), it is highly probable that data related to the region is hosted locally to reduce latency and comply with data residency norms.⁹
  • Risk: Data hosted in the Tel Aviv region is subject to Israeli domestic law. This means Israeli security services can access data on Palestinian users or activists staying in the West Bank via domestic court orders, bypassing the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) process required for US-hosted data.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Au10tix and Check Point are global vendors used by many Fortune 500 companies; their use is standard, not ideological.
• Rebuttal: For a company operating in a conflict zone, the choice of vendors matters. Using the intelligence tools of the occupying power (Au10tix/Shin Bet) to verify the identities of the occupied population represents a specific, heightened form of complicity. It is not “neutral” to use Shin Bet-derived tech to scan the ID of a Palestinian attempting to book a home. Furthermore, the Guesty relationship is more than vendor-client; it is a strategic ecosystem alignment born of Y Combinator that specifically empowers the supply side of the settlement market.

Analytical Assessment:

Digital complicity is High. Airbnb does not just “use” Israeli technology; it is architecturally dependent on it. The “Trust Stack” is effectively a sub-contracted extension of the Israeli security state. Removing these vendors would require a fundamental re-engineering of the platform. The “Unit 8200” origin of its security (Check Point) and identity (Au10tix) providers means Airbnb contributes revenue directly to the firms that commercialize the occupation’s surveillance capabilities.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Confirmation of the specific AWS region (Ireland vs. Tel Aviv) used to store the personal data of Palestinian ID holders.
• Details of data-sharing protocols between Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd and the Israeli Ministry of Tourism under their marketing agreements.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Entity: Au10tix ³⁵ (Vendor).
• Entity: Check Point Software ³⁹ (Vendor).
• Entity: Guesty ⁴⁰ (Partner).
• Entity: Unit 8200 / Shin Bet.¹⁰

Domain 3: Economic & Structural Complicity

Goal: To quantify the economic value Airbnb generates for the settlement enterprise and its fiscal integration with the State of Israel.

Evidence & Analysis:

• Direct Monetization of War Crimes: The audit confirms a persistent inventory of ~300 listings in illegal settlements.² These are not passive assets; they are active businesses. Airbnb charges a service fee (typically 3-15% from the guest and 3% from the host) on every booking. This constitutes the direct monetization of property built on seized Palestinian land.
  • The “Donation” Obfuscation: In 2019, Airbnb pledged to donate “profits” from West Bank listings to humanitarian aid.⁷ Forensic analysis reveals this to be a mechanism of “moral laundering”:
    1. Retention of Principal: The donation only covers Airbnb’s fee. The vast majority of the revenue (85-94%) is still remitted to the settler host. The economic incentive for the settler to occupy the land remains intact.
    2. Market Liquidity: The primary value Airbnb provides is not the fee, but the market access. Without the global visibility provided by the platform, the market for tourism in remote, militarized settlements like Tekoa or Avnat would collapse. By maintaining the listing, Airbnb provides the liquidity that makes the settlement enterprise economically sustainable.²
• Fiscal Integration (The Tax Nexus): Airbnb operates Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd, a fully registered Israeli subsidiary.³ This entity is integrated into the Israeli fiscal system.
  • VAT Collection: Airbnb acts as a tax collection agent for the Israeli government. It collects VAT on its service fees. For listings in the West Bank settlements, this tax revenue is remitted to the Israeli Tax Authority (ITA). This means Airbnb is directly generating revenue for the state treasury from activities conducted on occupied land—revenue that funds the Ministry of Defense and the settlement infrastructure.³
  • Income Reporting: The company facilitates the reporting of host income, ensuring the settlements are integrated into the formal Israeli economy rather than remaining a grey market.
• The Circular Capital Loop: The ownership structure reveals a feedback loop. Major shareholders include US giants, but also Israeli institutional investors like Altshuler Shaham and Psagot Investment House.³ Psagot is well-documented for financing settlement construction.
  • The Cycle: Israeli banks/investment houses finance the construction of settlement homes -> Airbnb lists these homes -> Global tourists book them -> Airbnb pays taxes to Israel -> Airbnb profits contribute to stock growth -> Israeli investment houses (shareholders) reap capital gains. This circular flow cements the economic interest of the Israeli financial sector in Airbnb’s continued complicity.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: The revenue from 300 listings is statistically insignificant compared to Airbnb’s $11.1 billion global revenue.¹¹
• Rebuttal: Complicity in international law is not measured by materiality thresholds but by the nature of the act. Facilitating a war crime is a violation regardless of the scale. Laundering “proceeds of crime” (as alleged by GLAN legal filings) is a criminal offense even if the amount is small relative to the bank’s total assets. The presence of the listings is a qualitative support for the occupation’s legitimacy, not just a quantitative one.
• Argument: The donation policy mitigates the harm.
• Rebuttal: As established, the donation does not stop the flow of funds to the perpetrators (settlers) nor does it remove the commercial platform that validates their presence. It is a PR containment strategy, not a human rights remedy.⁴²

Analytical Assessment:

Economic complicity is Severe. Airbnb functions as a “Structural Pillar” of the settlement tourism economy. It transforms isolated, illegal outposts into globally accessible assets. The existence of the local subsidiary, Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd, creates a “hostage” dynamic where the company is legally vulnerable to Israeli domestic pressure (taxation, lawsuits), forcing it to align with the state’s annexationist policies to protect its broader revenue stream in Tel Aviv.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Transparency reports detailing the exact amounts donated from West Bank profits and the specific identities of the recipient organizations (to ensure they are not “neutral” bodies that fail to address the specific harm to Palestinians).
• The exact employee headcount and R&D remit of Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Entity: Airbnb Israel Technologies Ltd ³ (Subsidiary).
• Entity: Israel Tax Authority.³
• Entity: Altshuler Shaham / Psagot ³ (Investors).
• Entity: GLAN (Global Legal Action Network) ³⁰ (Legal Plaintiff).

Domain 4: Political & Ideological Complicity

Goal: To analyze the ideological alignment of the leadership, the company’s susceptibility to political pressure (“Governance Capture”), and the consistency of its ethical standards.

Evidence & Analysis:

• The 2019 Policy Reversal (The Capitulation): The sequence of events from November 2018 to April 2019 serves as the definitive case study of Airbnb’s political complicity.
  • The Ban: On Nov 19, 2018, Airbnb announced it would remove listings in West Bank settlements, applying a “human suffering” framework.²¹
  • The Coercion: The reaction was a coordinated “Total War” by the pro-Israel lobby. Israeli Tourism Minister Yariv Levin threatened a “special high tax” on Airbnb operations. Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan mobilized US governors. The Texas Comptroller and Florida Governor threatened to divest state pension funds from Airbnb, effectively weaponizing US state capital against the company’s human rights policy.³
  • The Surrender: On April 9, 2019, facing the Silber lawsuit and state sanctions, Airbnb capitulated. It reinstated the listings and settled the suit.⁷ This proves that the company’s governance structure prioritizes US/Israeli political favor and market access over compliance with international law. The company was “captured” by the anti-BDS legislative complex.
• The “Safe Harbor” Double Standard (Ukraine vs. Gaza):
  • Ukraine (2022): Following the Russian invasion, Airbnb adopted a “Total Economic War” posture. It suspended all operations in Russia and Belarus, waived fees for Ukrainian hosts, and CEO Brian Chesky actively campaigned for the cause, adding a Ukrainian flag to his profile.⁶
  • Gaza (2023-2024): In the face of the destruction of Gaza, Airbnb maintained operations in Israel and the settlements. It offered “neutral” statements and partnered with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to police internal speech.⁶ It did not waive fees for Palestinians.
  • Implication: This disparity reveals that Airbnb’s “ethical” stance is not based on universal human rights but is aligned with US foreign policy interests. “Safe Harbor” is provided to victims of US adversaries (Ukraine) but withheld from victims of US allies (Palestinians).
• Internal Censorship & “Project Lighthouse”: The audit reveals internal suppression. “Project Lighthouse” is Airbnb’s data-driven initiative to uncover racial discrimination against Black guests in the US. However, the company has refused to extend this tool to the Israel/Palestine market, where Palestinian guests face systemic discrimination from Israeli hosts.⁶ Furthermore, employees have been fired or disciplined for expressing pro-Palestinian sentiment or posting “Free Palestine” on internal channels, often under “civility” codes enforced in partnership with the ADL.⁶
• Shareholder Activism as Political Warfare: Recent events (2024-2025) show the company under attack from the right. The Heritage Foundation and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) sued Airbnb for excluding shareholder proposals that sought to codify “neutrality” and prevent divestment from Israel.³¹ This indicates that the company is a battleground, but its current inertia favors the pro-Israel status quo to avoid further litigation.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: The reversal was a legal necessity due to the Fair Housing Act lawsuit (Silber).
• Rebuttal: The Fair Housing Act does not apply extraterritorially to the West Bank. The settlement was a strategic choice to avoid discovery, political fallout, and the financial hit from state-level divestment (Texas/Florida). The company chose to settle rather than defend its human rights policy in court.
• Argument: The leadership is philanthropic (Giving Pledge).
• Rebuttal: Philanthropy does not negate complicity. Funding “humanitarian aid” with one hand while facilitating the land theft that causes the need for aid with the other is a contradiction.

Analytical Assessment:

Political complicity is High. Airbnb has demonstrated that it is effectively “captured.” The Board, influenced by VC ties to Israel, views the country as a “Tech Hub” rather than an occupying power. This creates a cognitive dissonance where the reputational toxicity of the settlements is ignored until forced by activists—and even then, the company reverts to the status quo the moment state pressure is applied.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Internal Board minutes regarding the decision to settle the Silber case.
• Specific details of the “partnership” with the ADL regarding the definition of “hate speech” in internal moderation.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Entity: Anti-Defamation League (ADL) ⁶ (Partner).
• Entity: Israeli Ministry of Tourism ³ (Partner).
• Entity: Andreessen Horowitz / Sequoia ⁸ (Investors).
• Entity: Heritage Foundation ³¹ (Litigant).

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary

• Final Score: 443
• Tier: Tier C (High Complicity)
• Justification Summary: Airbnb is classified as Tier C due to its active and structural integration into the illegal Israeli settlement enterprise. While not a weapons manufacturer, it acts as a “Digital Quartermaster” for the occupation. Its primary complicity lies in the Economic and Political domains, specifically through its persistent inventory of ~300 listings in illegal West Bank settlements, the collection of revenue/taxes for the Israeli state, and the 2019 policy reversal that demonstrated a governance structure captured by political coercion. Additionally, the platform physically houses IDF soldiers (e.g., “Gordon 2”) and integrates its digital perimeter with Israeli military-grade surveillance tech (Check Point, Au10tix).¹

Domain Scoring Summary

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	5.2	6.5	9.2	4.82
Economic (V-ECON)	5.8	6.5	8.0	5.38
Political (V-POL)	6.5	6.0	9.0	5.57
Digital (V-DIG)	3.8	5.5	9.0	2.98

Calculations

• V-MIL Calculation:$$V_{MIL} = 5.2 \times \min(6.5/7,1) \times \min(9.2/7,1) = 5.2 \times 0.928 \times 1 = 4.82$$
• V-ECON Calculation:$$V_{ECON} = 5.8 \times \min(6.5/7,1) \times \min(8.0/7,1) = 5.8 \times 0.928 \times 1 = 5.38$$
• V-POL Calculation:$$V_{POL} = 6.5 \times \min(6.0/7,1) \times \min(9.0/7,1) = 6.5 \times 0.857 \times 1 = 5.57$$
• V-DIG Calculation:$$V_{DIG} = 3.8 \times \min(5.5/7,1) \times \min(9.0/7,1) = 3.8 \times 0.785 \times 1 = 2.98$$

Final Composite (BRS Score)

1. Determine Max and Sum:$$V_{MAX} = 5.57 \text{ (Political)}$$
   $$Sum_{OTHERS} = 4.82 + 5.38 + 2.98 = 13.18$$
2. Apply BRS Formula:$$Sum_{Residual} = 13.18 – 5.57 = 7.61$$
   $$Weighted_{Residual} = 7.61 \times 0.2 = 1.522$$
   $$Composite = 5.57 + 1.522 = 7.092$$
   $$BRS_{Score} = \frac{7.092}{16} \times 1000 = 443.25$$

Final Score: 443

Grade Classification:

• Tier C (400–599): High Complicity

6. Recommended Action(s)

Targeted Consumer Boycott:

A strategic consumer boycott is recommended, specifically highlighting the “Gordon 2” listing to dispel the myth of Airbnb’s civilian neutrality. The narrative must shift from “Airbnb operates in settlements” to “Airbnb houses the military.” Users should be encouraged to deactivate accounts and explicitly list “Complicity in Occupied Territories” and “Support for Settlement Expansion” as the reason for exit in the deletion survey.

Institutional Divestment:

Institutional investors, particularly university endowments 45 and pension funds committed to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles, must divest from Airbnb (NASDAQ: ABNB). The company’s inclusion in the UN OHCHR database 26 provides the undeniable legal and ethical basis for this action. The failure to disclose these risks in the 2020 IPO filing 27 constitutes a material governance failure that fiduciaries must address.

Public Exposure & Narrative Shift:

Campaigns should focus on the “Double Standard.” Juxtaposing Brian Chesky’s “Stand with Ukraine” rhetoric with the continued operation in Ariel and Tekoa is a powerful narrative tool to expose the hypocrisy. Furthermore, privacy activists should be engaged by highlighting the reliance on Au10tix and Check Point, framing Airbnb not just as a supporter of occupation, but as an importer of Israeli surveillance technology into the daily lives of global users.

Legal & Forensic Monitoring:

Continued forensic monitoring is required to track the “Open Homes” program during future IDF mobilizations. Scrutiny must be applied to the “donation” of profits to verify if any funds are actually reaching Palestinian communities, or if they are being diverted to “neutral” bodies that do not address the root harm. The legal proceedings in the UK and Ireland (GLAN) regarding “proceeds of crime” (money laundering) should be closely supported and monitored, as they represent the most viable path to establishing criminal liability for Airbnb executives.30

Works cited

1. Airbnb Calc
2. Seized, settled, let: how Airbnb and Booking.com help Israelis make money from stolen Palestinian land | West Bank | The Guardian, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/27/seized-settled-let-how-airbnb-and-bookingcom-help-israelis-make-money-from-stolen-palestinian-land
3. Airbnb economic Audit
4. Social Space – Gordon for Soldiers Only, Room A2 – Hotels for Rent in Tel Aviv-Yafo, Tel Aviv District, Israel – Airbnb, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1536759357280976579
5. Airbnb military Audit
6. Airbnb political Audit
7. Airbnb’s Reversal on Property Listings of Israeli Settlements Highlights Politicisation of Human Rights – Al-Haq, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/6069.html
8. Wiz and Google: Securing the Cloud – Sequoia Capital, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://sequoiacap.com/article/wiz-and-google-securing-the-cloud/
9. Airbnb digital Audit
10. How Israeli tech is leaving Lebanon by the wayside – L’Orient Today, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://today.lorientlejour.com/article/1351162/how-israeli-tech-is-leaving-lebanon-by-the-wayside.html
11. Airbnb – Wikipedia, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbnb
12. Startup Success Story: The Airbnb Revolution – 7startup, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://7startup.vc/post/startup-success-story-airbnb-a-world-built-on-connection-and-belonging/
13. About Guesty, Our Executive Team & Company Culture, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.guesty.com/about-us/
14. Unit 8200: Israel’s Information Warfare Unit – Grey Dynamics, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://greydynamics.com/unit-8200-israels-information-warfare-unit/
15. Investor Relations | Airbnb | Governance, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://investors.airbnb.com/governance/default.aspx
16. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Airbnb, Inc. – Who Profits, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3815?airbnb
17. Airbnb | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/business-and-management/airbnb
18. Israeli Company Guesty Manages Airbnb Properties for a Fee – NoCamels, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://nocamels.com/2014/12/guesty-airbnb-property-manager-assistant/
19. Bed and Breakfast on Stolen Land: Tourist Rental Listings in West Bank Settlements | HRW, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/11/20/bed-and-breakfast-stolen-land/tourist-rental-listings-west-bank-settlements
20. Silber, et al. v. Airbnb Historic Case – Center for Constitutional Rights, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/silber-et-al-v-airbnb
21. Airbnb Commits to Removing Illegal Rentals of Israeli Settlements in the West Bank, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://uscpr.org/airbnb-commits-removing-illegal-rentals-israeli-settlements-west-bank/
22. Palestinians Claim Violations by Israeli Settlers in Airbnb Case in U.S. Court – Just Security, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.justsecurity.org/63938/palestinians-claim-violations-by-israeli-settlers-in-airbnb-case-in-u-s-court/
23. Israel/Palestine: Airbnb overturns decision to remove listings in West Bank following lawsuits, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelpalestine-airbnb-overturns-decision-to-remove-listings-in-west-bank-following-lawsuits/
24. Boycott Airbnb Organizations – Coalition for Jewish Values, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://coalitionforjewishvalues.org/boycott-airbnb/organizations/
25. Airbnb reverses decision to remove Israeli West Bank homes from website – The Guardian, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/10/airbnb-reverses-decision-to-remove-israeli-west-bank-homes-from-website
26. UN database finds companies tied to Israeli settlements | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/article-868694
27. Airbnb listing: company is ‘deeply compromised’ by Israeli settlement properties, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2020/12/airbnb-listing-company-is-deeply-compromised-by-israeli-settlement-properties/
28. Guesty has acquired MyVR!, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.guesty.com/blog/guesty-has-acquired-myvr/
29. Airbnb faces lawsuits in the US over alleged discrimination after decison to stop listing rentals in Occupied Palestine Territories – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/airbnb-faces-lawsuits-in-the-us-over-alleged-discrimination-after-decison-to-stop-listing-rentals-in-occupied-palestine-territories/
30. Multi-jurisdiction legal actions target Airbnb listings in illegal Israeli Settlements – GLAN, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://glanlaw.org/cases/multi-jurisdiction-legal-actions-target-airbnb-listings-in-illegal-israeli-settlements/
31. The Heritage Foundation v. Airbnb Case – ADF Media, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://adfmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/theheritagefoundationonepagesummary.pdf
32. Exhibit A – Prnewswire.com, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2702537/Airbnb_Complaint_Exhibit_A.pdf?p=original
33. Heritage Foundation Sues Airbnb for Illegally Excluding Shareholder Proposal Encouraging Company to Resist Politicized Demands, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.heritage.org/press/heritage-foundation-sues-airbnb-illegally-excluding-shareholder-proposal-encouraging-company
34. The Social Space – Gordon for Soldiers Only, Room A1 – Airbnb, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.airbnb.co.za/rooms/1536219160974459314
35. Ron Atzmon – Imperial College London, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.imperial.ac.uk/stories/alumni-awards-2024-ron/
36. AU10TIX ID Document & Biometric Verification Platform and Reusable ID Solution Now Available in the Microsoft Azure Marketplace – PR Newswire, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/au10tix-id-document–biometric-verification-platform-and-reusable-id-solution-now-available-in-the-microsoft-azure-marketplace-301972212.html
37. Tech at the Service of Occupation – SMEX, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://smex.org/tech-at-the-service-of-occupation/
38. AU10TIX – Wikipedia, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AU10TIX
39. Check Point – Wikipedia, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Check_Point
40. Guesty – Wikipedia, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guesty
41. ON THE NORTH SHORE, PASSOVER MEANS FOOD AND MEMORIES – Jewish Journal, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://jewishjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019_04.11_JewishJournal.pdf
42. To Humanitarian Groups and Non-Profits Receiving Airbnb Funds: Say No to Dirty Money, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/16195.html
43. Trend Analysis The Israeli Unit 8200 An OSINT-based study CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT – CSS/ETH Zürich, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/Cyber-Reports-2019-12-Unit-8200.pdf
44. (PDF) Core Mondrian: Basic Mondrian beyond k-anonymity – ResearchGate, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396457731_Core_Mondrian_Basic_Mondrian_beyond_k-anonymity
45. advisory committee on socially responsible investing 2024 – 2025 annual report – Columbia Finance, accessed on January 18, 2026, https://www.finance.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/ACSRI/ACSRI%202025-2026/12.8.2025%20FINAL%20Merged%20ACSRI%20AY2024%20-%202025%20Annual%20Report.pdf