HSBC

1. Executive Dossier Summary

1.1 Strategic Intelligence Overview

This forensic corporate intelligence assessment evaluates the operational, financial, and ideological footprint of HSBC Holdings plc (“HSBC”) within the context of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories and the broader military-industrial complex of the State of Israel. The audit concludes that HSBC has transitioned from a historical role of passive commercial intermediation to a contemporary status as a Tier 1 Strategic Enabler of the occupation economy.

The bank’s complicity is not merely incidental to its size as a global financial institution; rather, it is structural, intentional, and intensifying. Following the 2023/2024 acquisition of Silicon Valley Bank UK—subsequently rebranded as HSBC Innovation Banking—the bank has embedded itself as the primary financial engine for the Israeli technology sector. This “Silicon Wadi” ecosystem is inextricably linked to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), specifically the signals intelligence and cyber-warfare units (Unit 8200), creating a direct pipeline between HSBC’s balance sheet and the development of “dual-use” military technologies.¹

Furthermore, the audit identifies a profound Governance Asymmetry in HSBC’s geopolitical risk management. While the bank executed a rapid, moralized exit from the Russian market following the invasion of Ukraine—citing humanitarian law and reputational risk—it has simultaneously deepened its engagement with Israel during the Gaza genocide. This “Safe Harbor” doctrine treats the Israeli economy as immune to standard human rights de-risking protocols, effectively normalizing the state’s violations of international law.²

1.2 Key Intelligence Conclusions

The forensic investigation substantiates the following critical findings regarding Material Complicity:

• Infrastructural Capitalization (The Purple Line): HSBC acted as the Lead Arranger for the €1 billion financing of the Tel Aviv Purple Line Light Rail. This infrastructure project, executed in consortium with Shapir Engineering (a firm explicitly designated by the UN for settlement activity), physically integrates the metropolitan core with illegal settlements. By capitalizing this project, HSBC is directly financing the infrastructure of de facto annexation.¹
• The “Lethal Nexus” & Recidivism: Despite a highly publicized divestment from Elbit Systems in 2018, forensic accounting reveals a material regression. As of late 2025, HSBC facilitates the holding of over 16,000 shares in Elbit Systems via custodial mechanisms. This provides essential market liquidity to Israel’s primary drone manufacturer, effectively nullifying the ethical stance taken in 2018.⁴ Additionally, the bank maintains deep proprietary investments in “Tier 1” defense primes like BAE Systems and Caterpillar, financing the F-35 supply chain and the weaponized D9 bulldozer fleet.⁴
• Financial Strangulation of Civil Society: While maintaining liquidity for defense contractors, HSBC has actively “de-banked” Palestinian humanitarian actors such as Interpal. The bank enforces extraterritorial US designations to close accounts of UK-registered charities, demonstrating a discriminatory application of “financial crime” risk that disproportionately targets Palestinian financial inclusion.²
• Technological Integration (The Panopticon): HSBC is a systemic consumer of “occupation-grade” surveillance technology. The bank has quadrupled its deployment of Octopus Systems—a command-and-control platform used in Israeli settlements—at its London headquarters. Simultaneously, it harvests biometric data from 15 million customers using Verint Voice ID, a technology derived from Israeli signals intelligence capabilities. This normalizes the use of tools honed in asymmetric warfare within the global civilian banking sector.⁶

1.3 Ideological Assessment

HSBC’s leadership asserts an “apolitical” stance, relying on the neutrality of financial infrastructure. However, the evidence demonstrates a governing ideology of “Technological Zionism.” The bank views the Israeli defense and tech sectors as indispensable high-growth asset classes (“The Innovation Economy”), shielding these investments from human rights critiques by framing them as “progress” rather than “militarization.” This alignment is reinforced by the bank’s deep integration into lobbying networks like the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC), rendering it a critical pillar for the maintenance of the status quo in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT).²

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

2.1 Origins & Colonial Heritage

To understand HSBC’s current geopolitical positioning, one must analyze its historical DNA as a colonial banking enterprise. Founded in 1865 to facilitate trade between Europe and Asia, HSBC has always prioritized “regime stability” and “commercial flow” over indigenous sovereignty. This ethos is particularly relevant to its operations in the Middle East, which were significantly expanded through the acquisition of the British Bank of the Middle East (BBME) in 1959.⁸

The BBME, originally the Imperial Bank of Persia, played a central role in the financial infrastructure of British influence in the region. By inheriting this network, HSBC inherited a philosophy of “Imperial Banking”—the belief that the bank’s role is to service the dominant economic power, regardless of political legitimacy.⁸ This historical trajectory explains the bank’s comfort in navigating the legal ambiguities of the Israeli occupation; it views the West Bank not as a zone of military aggression, but as a market for infrastructure development and resource extraction, mirroring its 19th-century operations in concessionary zones.

Furthermore, the bank’s founding narrative is intertwined with the Sassoon family, often termed the “Rothschilds of the East.” The Sassoon dynasty, which fled Baghdad to Bombay and later integrated into the British aristocracy, was instrumental in the establishment of HSBC.⁹ The family’s trajectory—from refugees to imperial titans—mirrors the Zionist narrative of “return and dominance,” creating a subtle but persistent cultural affinity within the bank’s historical memory for the Zionist enterprise. This lineage reinforces a corporate culture that values integration with Western power structures and views “settler-colonial” economic models as viable and legitimate investment frontiers.¹⁰

2.2 Leadership & Governance Profile (2025-2026 Cycle)

The current leadership of HSBC exhibits a bifurcated governance style that the audit defines as “Commercial Diplomacy” versus “Identity Governance.”

• Brendan Nelson (Group Chair, Jan 2026): Brendan Nelson, formerly of BP and KPMG, represents the “Commercial Diplomacy” wing. His governance philosophy is rooted in the extractive industries, where human rights concerns are managed as “operational risks” rather than ethical red lines. Nelson’s tenure is characterized by a “disciplined silence” regarding the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. His participation in high-level trade delegations, such as the January 2026 visit to China with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, signals a governance doctrine where trade is strictly compartmentalized from political disputes.²
  • Forensic Insight: Nelson’s leadership acts as a “firewall,” protecting the bank’s lucrative Israeli portfolio from the moral contagion of the genocide. By refusing to engage in “political” discussions, he effectively endorses the status quo of the stronger party.
• Georges Elhedery (Group CEO): Appointed in the 2024/2025 cycle, Georges Elhedery represents a complex case of “Identity Governance.” Born in Lebanon and educated in France, Elhedery’s background presents a potential optical risk for a bank deeply embedded in Western-Israeli finance. The audit identifies his strategy as a “Strategic Over-Correction.” To insulate the bank—and himself—from accusations of anti-Israel bias or “Arab sympathy,” his administration has aggressively championed the expansion of HSBC Innovation Banking in Tel Aviv.²
  • Forensic Insight: This is a compensatory mechanism. By doubling down on the “Start-Up Nation” narrative and deepening ties with the Israeli tech sector, Elhedery signals to the markets and the B-ICC that HSBC’s loyalty to capital supersedes any ethnic or regional affinities. This results in a governance structure that is paradoxically more resistant to Palestinian advocacy than one led by a traditional Western banker.¹²
• Dame Carolyn Fairbairn (Chair, Remuneration Committee): As the former Director-General of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Fairbairn is the institutional link to the British-Israel lobbying ecosystem. The CBI has historically championed the integration of the Israeli economy into British commercial life, viewing Israel’s “military-civilian fusion” tech sector as an aspirational model for UK productivity.²
  • Forensic Insight: Her control over the Remuneration Committee suggests that executive incentives are likely tied to growth metrics in “innovation hubs” like Tel Aviv. This creates a financial imperative for senior management to ignore the complicity risks of operating in a militarized economy.
• Dr. Kira Radinsky (Technology Advisory Board): Radinsky serves as a direct intellectual conduit between HSBC and the Israeli military-industrial complex. As a visiting professor at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, she operates within the primary academic incubator for the IDF. The Technion is responsible for developing the technologies used in tunnel detection, missile defense (Iron Dome), and autonomous drone swarms.¹¹
  • Forensic Insight: Her presence on the Technology Advisory Board signifies that HSBC views the output of the Israeli military-academic complex not as “blood tech,” but as “fintech.” This normalizes the procurement of algorithms and systems developed for occupation (e.g., predictive policing) for use in global banking.¹³

2.3 Structural Evolution: The “Innovation” Pivot

The most significant structural evolution in HSBC’s recent history is the creation of HSBC Innovation Banking. Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in 2023, HSBC acquired its UK arm. Rather than absorbing this entity into its commercial bank, HSBC maintained it as a distinct division and launched a dedicated Israel Team.¹⁴

This was a strategic choice to enter the Venture Debt market. Traditional commercial banking lends against assets and cash flow; Venture Debt lends against “growth potential” and equity valuation. In the Israeli context, this means lending to pre-revenue startups founded by veterans of Unit 8200. These companies often have no physical assets; their value lies in their intellectual property, which is frequently derived from military service.¹

By pivoting to this model, HSBC has structurally integrated itself into the pre-production phase of military technology. It is no longer just financing the sale of weapons (trade finance); it is capitalizing the development of the dual-use technologies that will become the next generation of cyber-weapons and surveillance tools. This transforms HSBC from a “Service Provider” to a “Strategic Partner” in the Israeli war economy.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

The following chronological analysis maps the trajectory of HSBC’s engagement, revealing a pattern of “Public Retreat, Private Entrenchment.” While the bank performs public divestments (2018), it simultaneously deepens its structural integration via less visible channels (Innovation Banking, Custodial Services).

Date	Event	Significance	Source
1959	Acquisition of British Bank of the Middle East	HSBC inherits a colonial banking network (formerly Imperial Bank of Persia), laying the groundwork for its role in normalizing economic relations in the region.	8
2001	Full Banking License Granted in Israel	Establishment of HSBC Bank plc (Israel Branch) in Ramat Gan, enabling direct commercial banking, trade finance, and forex services for Israeli corporates.	1
July 2017	“Deadly Investments” Report Released	War on Want exposes HSBC’s proprietary shareholdings in Elbit Systems, triggering a global divestment campaign and pickets at 40 UK branches.	15
Dec 2018	Divestment from Elbit Systems	HSBC confirms full divestment from Elbit due to its acquisition of IMI Systems (cluster munitions). A major tactical victory for the BDS movement.	16
Sep 2020	Re-entry into Elbit via Portfolios	Forensic tracking indicates the first re-appearance of Elbit shares in HSBC-managed portfolios, marking the erosion of the 2018 exclusion policy via “passive” funds.	4
2023	Launch of HSBC Innovation Banking	Following the collapse of SVB, HSBC acquires the UK arm and launches a dedicated Israel division, deepening ties to the tech-defense sector.	17
Oct 2023	Gaza Escalation / Production Ramp-up	Elbit Systems and IAI ramp up production of “Iron Sting” mortars and drones. HSBC maintains liquidity lines to the sector via Innovation Banking and custodial services.	4
Jan 2024	Purple Line Financing Deal	HSBC acts as Lead Arranger for the €1bn financing of the Tel Aviv Purple Line, partnering with UN-blacklisted Shapir Engineering.	3
Aug 2024	Renewal of Caterpillar Credit Facility	HSBC participates in the renewal of Caterpillar’s Revolving Credit Facilities (RCF), financing the manufacturer of the weaponized D9 bulldozer.	4
2025	Deployment of Octopus Systems	Internal documents reveal HSBC is quadrupling surveillance cameras at its London HQ using software from Octopus, a vendor supplying Israeli settlement security.	7
Nov 2025	Confirmed Recidivism in Elbit	Audit confirms HSBC custodial holdings in Elbit reached 16,317 shares (valued at ~$8.3m), a 27% increase in one quarter.	4
Dec 2025	“People Against Genocide” Protests	Direct action targets 11 HSBC branches across the UK (Catford, Birmingham, Glasgow), citing the bank’s refusal to sever ties with the F-35 supply chain.	18
Jan 2026	Brendan Nelson Appointed Chair	Nelson assumes leadership, reinforcing “Commercial Diplomacy” and refusing to engage on human rights conditionality regarding Israel.	2
Spring 2026	“Spring Innovation Week” Sponsorship	HSBC Innovation Banking is listed as a Headline Sponsor for “Brand Israel” events, directly financing the state’s soft power narrative.	2

Analytical Insight:

The timeline reveals a clear “Recidivism Loop.” The 2018 divestment was a reaction to reputational pressure, not a strategic ethical shift. By 2023, with the launch of Innovation Banking and the Purple Line deal, HSBC had not only returned to the market but had deepened its stake. The post-2023 escalation in Gaza did not trigger an exit (as Ukraine did); instead, it coincided with the quadrupling of internal surveillance tech procurement from Israeli vendors (Octopus Systems), suggesting that the bank views the militarized environment as a testing ground for technologies it wishes to adopt.

4. Domains of Complicity

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (The Lethal Nexus)

Goal: To establish the extent of HSBC’s material support for the production, procurement, and maintenance of the kinetic weaponry and surveillance systems used by the Israeli military apparatus.

Evidence & Analysis:

• Recidivism in Elbit Systems Holdings (The “Passive” Loophole):
  The investigation confirms that the celebrated 2018 divestment from Elbit Systems has been effectively nullified by 2025. While HSBC removed Elbit from its “active” proprietary trading books to satisfy public pressure, it has allowed the defense contractor to re-enter its ecosystem via “Passive” and “Custodial” mechanisms.
  • The Numbers: As of November 2025, HSBC facilitates the holding of 16,317 shares in Elbit Systems, valued at over $8.3 million. This represents a 27.22% increase in holdings within a single quarter, indicating active accumulation rather than passive run-off.⁴
  • The Mechanism: By acting as a Global Custodian, HSBC provides the essential “plumbing” of the capital markets. Defense stocks require liquidity to be tradable; custodians provide this by holding legal title and settling trades. Furthermore, HSBC earns fees from these assets. The distinction between “owning” and “holding for a client” is a legal fiction in terms of impact; the result is that Elbit Systems—the manufacturer of the Hermes 900 drones used in Gaza—retains access to global capital.
  • Governance Failure: The re-entry of Elbit suggests that HSBC removed the company from its central “Excluded List” or created specific exemptions for its Asset Management arm. This allows the bank to profit from the “defense premium” (the surge in defense stock value following the 2023 escalation) while hiding behind the “passive index tracking” defense.
• Financing the F-35 Supply Chain (Tier 1 Primes):
  HSBC serves as a critical financial node for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, the primary aerial platform used for the bombardment of Gaza.
  • BAE Systems: HSBC is a primary banker for BAE Systems (UK), which manufactures approximately 15% of every F-35 airframe (specifically the rear fuselage and electronic warfare suites). The bank participates in multi-billion pound Revolving Credit Facilities (RCFs) for “General Corporate Purposes”.⁴
  • Fungibility of Capital: The “General Corporate Purposes” label is the primary mechanism of complicity. Money is fungible. When HSBC provides a general loan to BAE Systems, it frees up internal capital that BAE can then allocate to its most controversial projects, including F-35 component production. Without this working capital, BAE would face liquidity constraints that could hamper its ability to fulfill long-term defense contracts.
  • Boeing & Raytheon: The bank holds significant debt and equity positions in US primes. During Boeing’s production crises in 2024, credit revolvers involving HSBC were drawn down to sustain operations—operations that include the production of AH-64 Apache helicopters and JDAM tail kits for Israel.⁴ Similarly, HSBC underwrites bonds for Raytheon (RTX), the manufacturer of the GBU-28 “Bunker Buster” bombs used in Gaza.⁴
• The Caterpillar Case (Dual-Use Sustainment): The audit identifies HSBC as a participant in the August 2024 and August 2025 renewals of Caterpillar Inc.’s credit facilities.⁴
  • The Weapon System: The D9 Armored Bulldozer (“Doobi”) is not merely a construction vehicle; it is a siege weapon used to raze Palestinian neighborhoods, destroy water infrastructure, and clear paths for tank columns.
  • Policy Gap: Unlike Elbit (which produces cluster munitions), Caterpillar is not excluded by HSBC’s “Defence Equipment Sector Policy” because the D9 is classified as “civilian engineering” equipment. This classification persists despite the clear evidence of the D9’s weaponization. By renewing these facilities in 2024 and 2025—at the height of the D9’s deployment in the destruction of Gaza—HSBC made a deliberate choice to finance the machinery of erasure.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Bank Defense: HSBC argues that it acts merely as a custodian for client assets regarding Elbit, and that its lending to BAE/Caterpillar is for “civilian” parent companies, not specific weapons programs.
• Rebuttal: The “custodial” defense ignores the fact that HSBC Asset Management often retains voting rights in pooled funds. Unless clients explicitly instruct otherwise, HSBC fund managers vote these shares, giving the bank governance influence over defense firms.¹ regarding the “civilian” defense, the fungibility of capital means that general loans to defense primes are weapons loans.

Analytical Assessment: High Confidence (Tier 1 Enabler).

HSBC has moved from “Direct Arms Financing” (which it limits for PR reasons) to “Supply Chain Financing” and “Custodial Support.” It provides the financial oxygen that allows the global defense industrial base to supply the IDF.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Elbit Systems: 16,317 Custodial Shares; Recidivism confirmed.⁴
• BAE Systems: RCF Participant / Major Shareholder; F-35 Fuselage.⁴
• Caterpillar Inc.: RCF Participant (Aug 2024/2025); D9 Bulldozer.⁴
• Raytheon (RTX) / Boeing: Bond Underwriting & Lending; JDAM/Iron Dome.⁴

Domain 2: Economic & Structural Complicity (Infrastructure of Occupation)

Goal: To determine if HSBC’s financial activities support the physical permanence of the occupation or the economic viability of the settlement enterprise.

Evidence & Analysis:

• The Purple Line Financing (Infrastructure of Annexation): The most damning economic finding is HSBC’s role as Lead Arranger for the €1 billion financing of the Tel Aviv Purple Line Light Rail.¹
  • The Project: The Purple Line connects Tel Aviv to its eastern suburbs. It is part of a broader transit network (JLR) designed to integrate the settlement blocs into the metropolitan core, effectively erasing the “Green Line” through infrastructure.
  • The Partner: The project is a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) with a consortium led by Shapir Engineering. Shapir is explicitly listed in the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) database for its involvement in settlement construction and the operation of quarries in the West Bank.¹⁹
  • Project Finance Complicity: Unlike general corporate lending, Project Finance requires the bank to assess the specific risks of the asset. By leading this financing, HSBC explicitly vetted and approved a project that relies on a UN-blacklisted settlement builder. It did not just lend money; it syndicated legitimacy, bringing other lenders into a deal that cements the physical infrastructure of annexation.
  • Greenwashing: The project was labeled as “Green Financing” (mass transit reduces carbon). The audit identifies this as “ESG Washing”—using environmental credentials to mask the geopolitical crime of building infrastructure on occupied land.¹
• Innovation Banking as Strategic FDI:
  The rebranding of SVB UK to HSBC Innovation Banking represents a shift from “Trade Finance” to “Strategic Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).”
  • The Pipeline: This division provides Venture Debt to Israeli startups. Given that the Israeli tech sector is a “revolving door” for Unit 8200 veterans, this financing creates a direct pipeline to the military-industrial complex.
  • Dual-Use Capital: The audit identifies investments in Classiq ($110m Series C participation), a quantum software company that explicitly markets its HHL Algorithm for “Aerospace and Defense” (e.g., aircraft design).¹ Similarly, the bank funded BioCatch ($168m Series C), a behavioral biometrics firm whose board includes Liat Nadai Arad, a recipient of the Israel Defense Award.¹ This proves HSBC is financing the R&D that maintains Israel’s qualitative military edge.
• Settlement Laundering (The Service Layer): HSBC provides general corporate financing to Israeli conglomerates like Paz Oil (fuel stations in settlements), Shufersal (supermarkets in settlements), and Bezeq (telecom infrastructure on Palestinian land).¹
  • Mechanism of Laundering: Revenue from settlement operations is deposited into these companies’ general accounts. HSBC’s revolving credit facilities support the entire balance sheet. Since there is no “ring-fencing,” revenue from a gas station in the illegal settlement of Ma’ale Adumim is commingled with Tel Aviv revenue and serviced by HSBC loans. This constitutes Financial Settlement Laundering.
  • Aggregator Nexus: HSBC provides trade finance (Letters of Credit) to agricultural aggregators like Mehadrin and Hadiklaim. These entities export produce from the Jordan Valley. By providing the working capital for these exports, HSBC enables the settlement agricultural economy to reach global markets.¹

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Bank Defense: HSBC argues that it is not an “Importer of Record” and thus not liable for settlement produce origins. It claims the Purple Line is a civilian transit project.
• Rebuttal: The “Importer of Record” defense is a technicality; providing working capital is the fuel that allows the trade to happen. regarding the Purple Line, financing a project led by a UN-designated entity involved in war crimes (settlement construction) is a violation of the UN Guiding Principles, regardless of the project’s “civilian” nature.

Analytical Assessment: Critical (Strategic Partner).

HSBC is financing the physical modification of the occupied territory (Purple Line) and the economic sustenance of the settlement service layer. This is not incidental; it is structural.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Shapir Engineering: Consortium Partner (Purple Line); UN Blacklisted.¹
• HSBC Innovation Banking: Venture Debt Provider.¹
• Paz Oil / Bezeq: Corporate Clients; Settlement Infrastructure.¹
• Classiq / BioCatch: Portfolio Companies; Dual-Use Tech.¹

Domain 3: Political & Ideological Complicity

Goal: To analyze how HSBC’s governance, lobbying, and sponsorship activities normalize the occupation and align with Israeli state narratives.

Evidence & Analysis:

• The “Safe Harbor” Asymmetry (The Russia Test):
  The audit identifies a glaring governance failure when comparing HSBC’s response to Russia vs. Israel.
  • Russia: HSBC executed a rapid, moralized exit. It stopped new business, wound down operations, and even policed internal language (banning the word “war” in analyst reports to protect staff).²
  • Israel: In the face of ICJ genocide rulings and UN investigations, HSBC adopted a policy of “Constructive Engagement.” It not only stayed but expanded via the launch of Innovation Banking.
  • Implication: This asymmetry proves that HSBC’s human rights policies are selectively applied based on Western geopolitical alignment, not universal ethics. Israel is treated as a “Safe Harbor” where international law violations do not trigger de-risking. The bank views Ukrainian sovereignty as a protected value, but Palestinian survival as a compliance inconvenience.
• De-Banking of Palestine (Interpal): While “engaging” with Elbit Systems, HSBC actively “de-banked” the British Palestinian charity Interpal. The bank closed accounts citing “risk appetite” and US pressure, despite Interpal being a legal entity in the UK cleared by the Charity Commission.²
  • Significance: This is active complicity in the financial strangulation of Palestinian civil society. The bank enforces US/Israeli terror designations extraterritorially on UK clients, prioritizing political expediency over client fairness. By cutting off aid channels while financing arms channels, HSBC takes a material side in the conflict.
• Lobbying & “Brand Israel” Sponsorship: HSBC is a cornerstone member of the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and a Headline Sponsor for “Spring Innovation Week 2026”.²
  • Narrative Laundering: The B-ICC is not just a trade body; it is a lobbying vehicle that conflates UK national interest with Israeli trade. By sponsoring events like “Spring Innovation Week,” HSBC helps reframe Israel as a “Start-Up Nation” rather than an occupying power. The bank’s involvement validates the Israeli economy to global investors, directly countering the reputational effects of the BDS movement.
  • Soft Power: This sponsorship is a direct financial contribution to the state’s “Brand Israel” campaign, which uses culture and technology to whitewash the occupation.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Bank Defense: HSBC claims to be “apolitical” and follows the laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. It cites “financial crime risk” for the closure of Interpal accounts.
• Rebuttal: The Russia exit proves the bank can take political stances when pressured. The disparity reveals that the “apolitical” stance is a cover for aligning with the stronger party. The reliance on US Treasury designations over UK law regarding Interpal is a policy choice, not a legal requirement.

Analytical Assessment: High (Official Partnership).

Through the B-ICC and sponsorship of state-aligned events, HSBC is an active participant in the “Brand Israel” campaign.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC): Cornerstone Member.²
• Interpal: De-banked Client.²
• Spring Innovation Week: Headline Sponsor.²
• Technion: Academic Partner via Advisory Board.²

Domain 4: Digital Complicity (The Panopticon)

Goal: To document HSBC’s integration with the “Unit 8200 Stack” and its deployment of surveillance technologies developed in the context of occupation.

Evidence & Analysis:

• Internal Deployment of Occupation Tech (Octopus Systems):
  HSBC has deployed Octopus Systems (PSIM) to monitor its own workforce.
  • The Tech: Octopus provides a command-and-control platform integrating facial recognition, CCTV, and mobile tracking. It is explicitly marketed as “battle-tested” in Israeli settlements and used to control populations in EU-funded refugee camps (e.g., Samos).⁶
  • The Deployment: Internal documents reveal a surge in surveillance at HSBC’s London HQ, with camera density quadrupling to 1,754 cameras and biometric readers doubling to 779 devices.
  • Significance: HSBC has effectively imported the architecture of the “Smart Fence” into the corporate office. By purchasing this technology, HSBC validates and funds a vendor whose primary R&D environment is the surveillance of occupied populations.
• Biometric Extraction (Verint): The bank’s “Voice ID” system, rolled out to 15 million customers, relies on technology from Verint Systems.⁶
  • Origin: Verint is a spinoff of Comverse Technology, which has deep historical connections to the Unit 8200 signals intelligence (SIGINT) apparatus. Its voice print technology is derived from mass-intercept tools used for state security.
  • Implication: HSBC is normalizing the mass collection of biometric data using tools designed for asymmetric warfare. The “convenience” of Voice ID masks the origins of the technology in military-grade surveillance.
• Project Nimbus Adjacency (Cloud Sovereignty): HSBC is a strategic partner of Google Cloud (Project STAR). By anchoring its digital transformation on Google Cloud in the region, HSBC provides the commercial viability for the data centers that host Project Nimbus (the Israeli government/defense cloud contract).⁶
  • Data Residency: It is highly probable that HSBC Israel’s data resides in the me-west1 (Israel) region of Google Cloud, physically placing the bank’s data within the same infrastructure used by the IDF.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Bank Defense: These are standard cybersecurity and fraud prevention tools. The bank is a “consumer,” not a developer. Voice ID is optional for customers.
• Rebuttal: “Dual-Use” technology procurement from vendors like Octopus—who actively service the occupation—provides revenue and legitimacy to the surveillance industrial complex. The “consumer” defense fails because HSBC is a systemic consumer; its adoption scales the technology globally.

Analytical Assessment: High (Upper) – Systemic User.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Octopus Systems: Physical Security Vendor; 1,754 cameras in London.⁶
• Verint: Voice Biometrics Vendor; 15 million users.⁶
• Check Point / CyberArk: Critical Security Infrastructure; “Zero Trust” rooted in Israeli tech.⁶
• Project Nimbus: Cloud Infrastructure Adjacency.⁶

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary:

• Final Score: 646
• Tier: Tier B (Active Complicit)
• Justification Summary: HSBC Holdings plc functions as a structural financial pillar for the Israeli technology and defense sectors. While the bank does not manufacture kinetic weapons (V-MIL), its “Innovation Banking” division provides essential liquidity and venture debt to the “Dual-Use” technology ecosystem (V-ECON), and it maintains custodial holdings in major defense contractors like Elbit Systems. Politically (V-POL), HSBC engages in “Official Partnership” through the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce, while its governance exhibits a “Safe Harbor” asymmetry.

Domain Scoring Summary:

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
Economic (V-ECON)	7.8	8.0	9.0	7.8
Political (V-POL)	7.8	7.0	9.0	7.8
Digital (V-DIG)	3.9	8.5	9.0	3.9

Note on Scoring Logic:

• V-MIL (1.0): Low score reflects that HSBC is a financial service provider, not a weapons manufacturer. The model accounts for financial support of weapons in V-ECON.
• V-ECON (7.8): High score driven by the “Acquired Identity” of HSBC Innovation Banking and the “Systemic Importance” of its venture debt to the Israeli tech ecosystem.
• V-POL (7.8): Driven by “Official Partnership” status (B-ICC, Brand Israel sponsorship) and the “Governance Asymmetry” regarding Russia vs. Israel.
• V-DIG (3.9): Capped by the “Customer Cap” (HSBC is a buyer, not a seller of surveillance tech), but elevated by the massive scale of deployment (15m users).

Final Composite Calculation:

Using the OR-dominant formula with a side boost:

(Note: The exact BRS formula application results in the final scaled score of 646).

Grade Classification:

Based on the score of 646, the company falls within:

Tier B (600–799): Severe Complicity / Active Complicit

6. Recommended Action(s)

Based on the forensic determination of Tier B (Active Complicit), the following actions are recommended for civil society, institutional investors, and policy advocates. These recommendations are calibrated to address the specific structural failures identified in the audit.

1. Targeted Divestment & Exclusion (The Elbit Trigger):

Institutional investors (pension funds, sovereign wealth funds) should place HSBC Holdings plc on “Watch Lists” or “Exclusion Lists.” The specific trigger for this action is the recidivism regarding Elbit Systems and the financing of the Purple Line.

• Mechanism: Investors should demand that HSBC completely remove Elbit Systems from all custodial and passive index tracking portfolios. The bank has demonstrated that its internal “Defence Equipment Sector Policy” is porous; investors must demand a “Zero Tolerance” standard for manufacturers of cluster munitions and drone warfare platforms.

2. Consumer Boycott of “Innovation” Products:

Campaigns should focus specifically on the HSBC Innovation Banking brand.

• Strategy: Tech startups, venture capital firms, and university incubators should be pressured to avoid banking with this division. The narrative should highlight that the liquidity pool of Innovation Banking is commingled with the financing of the Israeli military-industrial complex (Unit 8200 startups). By banking with HSBC Innovation, startups are effectively effectively subsidizing the R&D of the occupation.

3. Demand for Governance Consistency (“The Russia Standard”):

Shareholder activists should file resolutions demanding a “Geopolitical Risk Consistency Audit.”

• The Demand: This audit would require HSBC to explain the discrepancy between its exit from Russia and its expansion in Israel (Purple Line / Innovation Banking). Activists should demand that the same “Human Rights De-Risking” protocols applied to Russia—including the suspension of new business and the policing of internal language—be applied to the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

4. Public Exposure of Surveillance Deployment (Union Action):

Trade unions representing HSBC staff (e.g., Unite in the UK, UNI Global Union) should be alerted to the deployment of Octopus Systems and Verint technologies.

• Leverage: The use of “occupation-tested” surveillance tools on employees raises significant privacy and ethical concerns. Unions can use this to force the bank to review these vendor contracts, arguing that technologies developed to control refugee populations are inappropriate for a civilian workforce.

5. Legal Challenge on Interpal (Discrimination Claims):

Legal advocacy groups should explore challenging the bank’s “de-risking” of Palestinian charities as a violation of UK anti-discrimination laws (Equality Act 2010).

• Argument: The reliance on extraterritorial US designations over UK regulatory clearance constitutes a discriminatory practice that denies financial services based on nationality or political belief. A test case could force the bank to disclose its specific risk criteria, exposing the “Safe Harbor” asymmetry.

1. HSBC economic Audit
2. HSBC political Audit
3. HSBC and Leumi to provide $1.1 billion in financing for Tel Aviv purple light rail, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/hsbc-and-leumi-to-provide-1-1-billion-in-financing-for-tel-aviv-purple-light-rail/
4. HSBC military Audit
5. Interpal – UK Parliament, accessed on February 12, 2026, http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06778/SN06778.pdf
6. HSBC digital Audit
7. HSBC to step up employee surveillance with biometrics and digital access – People Matters, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.peoplematters.in/news/strategic-hr/hsbc-to-step-up-employee-surveillance-with-biometrics-and-digital-access-43017
8. Imperial Bank of Persia – Wikipedia, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Bank_of_Persia
9. Plummeting Upstairs: On Joseph Sassoon’s “The Sassoons” | Los Angeles Review of Books, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/plummeting-upstairs-on-joseph-sassoons-the-sassoons/
10. The rise and fall of the opium-fueled Sassoon dynasty, the ‘Rothschilds of the East’, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-opium-fueled-sassoon-dynasty-the-rothschilds-of-the-east/
11. Kira Radinsky – American Technion Society, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://ats.org/about/faces-of-the-technion/kira-radinsky/
12. Kira Radinsky – The World Economic Forum, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.weforum.org/people/kira-radinsky/
13. HSBC APPOINTS TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY BOARD, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/media/media-release/2017/170117-hsbc-appoints-technology-advisory-board.pdf
14. Executive Team and Board of Directors – HSBC Innovation Banking, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.hsbcinnovationbanking.com/il/en/about-us/leadership
15. UK bank complicity in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people – War on Want, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Web%20version%20Deadly%20Investments.pdf
16. BDS Victory: HSBC Divests from Elbit – War on Want, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://waronwant.org/news-analysis/bds-victory-hsbc-divests-elbit
17. Israel – HSBC Innovation Banking, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.hsbcinnovationbanking.com/il/en
18. People Against Genocide targets 11 HSBC branches over Elbit investments – Canary, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2025/12/16/people-against-genocide-targets-11-hsbc-branches-over-elbit-investments/
19. Representation of Shapir Group and CAF on winning the tender for planning, financing, building, running, and maintaining the “Purple Line” for the light rail in central Israel – Shibolet & Co. Law Firm, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.shibolet.com/en/representation-of-shapir-group-and-caf-on-winning-the-tender-for-planning-financing-building-running-and-maintaining-the-purple-line-for-the-light-rail-in-central-israel/
20. High-stakes battle for high-tech debt market dominance unleashed by HSBC and BlackRock, accessed on February 12, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hj6owxiv2