BDS-1000 Dossier: Jeep (Stellantis N.V.)

Dossier Reference: 06-main-dossier.md Subject: Jeep - automotive marque wholly owned by Stellantis N.V. BRS Score: 292 | Tier: D (Moderate) Audit Basis: Military, Digital, Economic, Political (June 2026) Epistemics: Documentary - evidence-only; no advocacy

Target Profile

Key Facts:

• Israeli market presence: vehicles sold via independent franchise importer (Colmobil; Samelet Motors); no owned operations in Israel

Executive Summary

Jeep is a globally recognised automotive marque specialising in sport-utility and light-utility vehicles. As a wholly owned brand of Stellantis N.V. - the multinational automotive group formed from the 2021 merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Groupe PSA - Jeep’s corporate governance, financial structure, and market operations are fully integrated into the Stellantis group. Jeep vehicles are sold in Israel exclusively through independent franchise distributors; Stellantis maintains no manufacturing, warehousing, or operational facilities within Israeli territory.

The most material documented Israel-Palestine nexus identified across the four domain audits is a military-vehicle licensing relationship that dates to 1990. Chrysler Corporation (Jeep’s predecessor) entered a licensing agreement with Automotive Industries Ltd. (AIL), an Israeli manufacturer headquartered in Upper Nazareth (Nof HaGalil), authorising AIL to produce the AIL Storm (Sufa) - a series of tactical off-road vehicles derived from successive generations of the Jeep Wrangler platform - for the Israeli Security Forces (IDF and Israel Police). The IDF procurement of Storm 3 vehicles (Jeep J8 platform, assembled locally as the Storm 3/Sufa 3) was documented at approximately 550 vehicles valued at NIS 47 million plus $23 million in U.S. foreign aid. Chrysler/Jeep launched the J8 as a purpose-built military platform at the DSEi arms exhibition in London in 2007. This relationship constitutes the primary driver of Jeep’s Military score.

No direct defence contract between Stellantis and the Israeli Ministry of Defence has been identified; the relationship runs through the AIL licence. No Israeli defence prime (Elbit, IAI, Rafael) supply relationship with Jeep or Stellantis has been identified. No munitions, weapons systems, strategic platforms, heavy machinery, logistical sustainment, or settlement-adjacent construction role has been documented. No Israeli-origin cybersecurity, surveillance, or dual-use technology dependency in Jeep’s enterprise or vehicle stack has been confirmed in public records. Economic presence is mediated entirely through the independent franchise importer Colmobil Corporation (and, separately, Samelet Motors); no owned Israeli operations, direct investment, or R&D footprint has been identified. Politically, Stellantis condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine and suspended Russian operations in 2022; no comparable statement or action regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict has been identified.

The Digital domain produced a zero score: no confirmed Israeli technology vendor relationships, no Israeli data infrastructure, no surveillance technology deployment, and no documented digital-nexus vectors. The Economic score reflects the commercial vehicle-import relationship through a franchise importer. The Political score is driven by the Israel Innovation Authority MOU (a civilian R&D cooperation agreement) and the AIL military licensing relationship documented in Military, rather than by discrete political lobbying or advocacy activity. The resulting BRS of 292 places Jeep in Tier D (Moderate) - a score that reflects a genuine, documented military-licensing nexus while noting the absence of direct government contracts, owned Israeli operations, or settlement involvement.

Timeline of Relevant Events

Corporate Overview

Group Structure

Stellantis N.V. is a Dutch-incorporated multinational automotive group listed on the NYSE, Euronext Milan, and Euronext Paris (ticker: STLA). It was formed on 25 January 2021 through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) and Groupe PSA. Jeep is a wholly owned subsidiary brand; the Jeep trademark is held through FCA US LLC. The brand has no independent corporate charter or separate legal entity creating a distinct geopolitical mandate.¹⁵

Principal shareholders (as of 2023):

• Exor N.V. (Agnelli family holding, Netherlands): ~14.4%⁵¹⁶
• EPF/FFP (Peugeot family holding, France): ~7.1%¹⁶
• French State via BPI France: ~6.2%⁷¹⁶
• Free float: ~72%¹⁶

No Israeli state body, sovereign wealth fund, or government-affiliated entity holds a publicly documented stake in Stellantis.¹⁶

Israeli Entities and Franchise Relationships

Colmobil Corporation Ltd. (TASE-listed) holds the exclusive authorised importer and distributor franchise for Stellantis brands - including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, and Ram - in Israel under a dealer/franchise agreement whose commercial terms are not publicly disclosed.^9101718 Colmobil is an independent Israeli corporation; it is not a wholly owned Stellantis subsidiary, joint venture, or dedicated import vehicle. Jeep models confirmed as available in the Israeli market include the Wrangler 4xe, Grand Cherokee, Compass, and Renegade.[^25]

Samelet Motors (also rendered Samelet; privately held, Israeli; founded 1946; Levy family-controlled) holds the Israeli franchises for Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Maserati, Jeep, Ram, Dodge, and Chrysler, and is described in trade press as one of two Stellantis-group importers in Israel.¹¹¹⁹ Samelet is not identified in available sources as operating within Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Automotive Industries Ltd. (AIL) - Upper Nazareth (Nof HaGalil), Israel - is the documented Israeli manufacturing partner under the military licensing arrangement (see Military Domain Summary). AIL is not a subsidiary, joint venture, or affiliate of Stellantis; it is a separate Israeli corporation operating under a licence from Chrysler/FCA/Stellantis.³⁴

No Israeli R&D or Operational Footprint

Stellantis operates R&D facilities in Italy (Turin), France (Vélizy), Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States (Auburn Hills, MI), and Brazil.¹⁷ No Israeli R&D facility, engineering office, innovation lab, or accelerator programme is listed in any Stellantis corporate disclosure reviewed.²⁰ No owned or operated offices, factories, warehouses, sales operations, or retail locations within Israel or the occupied territories have been identified; all in-market presence is mediated through the independent franchisee network.³⁹¹⁷¹²

Domain Summaries

Military: Military

Mechanism of Involvement

The documented military involvement is a technology-licensing relationship through which an Israeli manufacturer - Automotive Industries Ltd. (AIL), Upper Nazareth - produces tactical off-road vehicles for the Israeli Security Forces under licence from Jeep’s corporate predecessor (Chrysler Corporation, now Stellantis via FCA US LLC).

Since 1990, AIL has produced successive generations of the AIL Storm (Sufa) series - Storm I/M-240 (1991–1996, YJ/CJ-based), Storm II/M-242 (TJ-based), and Storm III/Sufa 3 (JK-based) - described in trade references as “the workhorse of the Israeli Security Forces” and “a major supplier of the Israeli Security Forces.”³⁴ The Storm provides STANAG 4569 Level I protection against 7.62 mm armour-piercing rounds, hand grenades, and fragmentation; configurations include a light armoured vehicle, command vehicle, and light reconnaissance vehicle with machine-gun mounting capability.³¹⁹

Separately, Chrysler/Jeep launched the Jeep J8 - a purpose-built military version of the Wrangler - at the DSEi arms exhibition in London in September 2007, marketing it for “command vehicle to troop/cargo carrier, ambulance, communications vehicle and other duties.”⁸⁹ The J8 is assembled in Israel by AIL and locally badged Storm 3; it is documented as supplied to the IDF as a command vehicle.⁸¹⁰ The IDF procurement of approximately 550 Storm 3 vehicles was valued at approximately NIS 47 million (~$13 million) plus a further $23 million in U.S. foreign aid, described at the time as the Defence Ministry’s most expensive purchase of an unarmoured Israeli vehicle.¹¹

The relationship is characterised as a licensing arrangement, not a direct defence contract: Chrysler/Stellantis is the licensor of the Wrangler platform design; AIL is the Israeli licensee and manufacturer.³⁴ Chrysler lacked its own military assembly capability and selected the Israeli AIL operation over comparable facilities in Egypt and Venezuela because of its capacity to develop specialised and armoured variants.¹¹

No public evidence has been identified of Jeep or Stellantis appearing as a named entity in SIBAT listings or the Israeli Government Procurement Authority database; the documented military relationship runs through the AIL licence and the J8/Storm platform.¹¹ No supply relationship from Jeep/Stellantis to Israeli defence prime contractors (Elbit Systems, IAI, Rafael, IMI) has been identified; the documented relationship runs in the opposite direction - Jeep/Stellantis as licensor, AIL as the Israeli manufacturer.¹⁴

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Civilian character of the primary relationship: The Jeep brand manufactures consumer and light-commercial vehicles. The Wrangler platform from which the Storm is derived is a civilian SUV; the Storm’s military adaptations (armour, suspension, braking upgrades, weapons mounting) are developed and implemented by AIL, not by Jeep or Stellantis engineering.³¹⁹ The J8 is marketed by Jeep for government and utility purposes broadly - not exclusively for combat use; Jeep’s own J8 release states the vehicle is “not designed for front-line combat operations.”⁹

Licensing vs. direct supply: Jeep/Stellantis is not a direct supplier to the IDF. The commercial relationship is a technology licence - a legal authorisation for AIL to manufacture vehicles based on the Wrangler design. Jeep receives royalty income under this licence but does not tender for, bid on, or fulfil Israeli defence procurement orders directly.³⁴ The IDF procures from AIL, which is the Israeli counterparty.

Absence of named direct contracts: No direct named defence contract between Stellantis and the Israeli Ministry of Defence, IDF, or Israeli security agencies has been identified in any reviewed procurement database, SIBAT listing, or government disclosure.¹¹ The audit explicitly notes that the relationship runs through the AIL licence rather than a direct Stellantis defence contract.

Arms-exhibition participation does not establish Israeli-specific intent: The Jeep J8 was launched at a general defence exhibition (DSEi, London) and marketed globally to multiple military customers. Documented J8 operators include Taiwan, Italy, Guatemala, Panama, Ghana, Mongolia, and Peru - demonstrating a broader international government-vehicle market rather than an Israeli-specific programme.⁸

Temporal attenuation: The licensing relationship began in 1990 - four decades before the current conflict context that BDS frameworks primarily address. The audits record the relationship without applying a temporal cutoff but note it as established historical fact.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Digital: Digital

Mechanism of Involvement

The Digital audit examined Jeep’s enterprise technology stack, connected-vehicle platform, cloud infrastructure, Israeli-origin cybersecurity and enterprise software vendors, surveillance technologies, and data infrastructure for any documented Israel-Palestine nexus.

Confirmed technology relationships:

• Amazon Web Services (AWS): Stellantis maintains a strategic cloud partnership with AWS to underpin connected vehicle services, the STLA Brain software-defined vehicle (SDV) platform, and enterprise IT infrastructure. The AWS partnership also includes in-vehicle Alexa integration across Stellantis brands including Jeep.¹⁰¹¹
• Mobileye (Israeli-founded, Jerusalem; Intel subsidiary since 2017): Stellantis has publicly confirmed use of Mobileye-derived Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) - EyeQ chips and camera-based perception software - across multiple vehicle platforms. This is a commercial OEM-to-Tier-1-supplier relationship present across the global automotive industry.⁸ No provision of this technology to any Israeli state, military, or security body by Stellantis or in connection with Stellantis’s use of Mobileye has been identified in public records.
• STLA Brain / STLA SmartCockpit: Stellantis’s proprietary SDV architecture, developed with named software partners. No Israeli-origin technology is identified as a named component supplier in this publicly disclosed architecture.⁸
• Foxconn (Mobile Drive JV): Joint venture for cockpit electronics and in-vehicle software stacks.¹⁹

Israeli cybersecurity vendors surveyed with no confirmed Stellantis/Jeep relationship identified: Check Point Software, Wiz, SentinelOne, CyberArk, NICE Systems, Verint Systems, Claroty, Palo Alto Networks, Upstream Security (automotive cybersecurity; no confirmed Stellantis contract identified), Argus Cyber Security (Israeli; acquired by Continental 2017; published research referencing FCA/Stellantis platforms in vulnerability context but no confirmed active vendor contract), C2A Security (Israeli; no named Stellantis/Jeep customer identified).^{14711820152112222316}[^28][^29]

Surveillance and biometric technologies: No public evidence identified of Stellantis or Jeep deploying facial recognition, biometric identification, behavioural analytics, predictive policing, or gait-analysis technologies from Israeli-origin vendors. Vendors surveyed include AnyVision/Oosto, BriefCam, and Trigo.[^25][^26][^27]

Cloud and data infrastructure: Stellantis’s primary cloud partner is AWS; no Israeli data centre footprint, no Project Nimbus involvement, no data sovereignty services marketed to Israeli state institutions have been identified.¹¹²

Evidence gap note: Stellantis does not publicly disclose its full enterprise software vendor stack. Use of Israeli-origin cybersecurity or analytics software at the enterprise infrastructure level cannot be confirmed or ruled out without access to internal procurement records or confirmed vendor-side named-customer disclosures.³⁴

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Standard automotive ADAS supply relationship: Stellantis’s use of Mobileye ADAS technology is a commercial OEM-Tier 1 supplier relationship - the same dynamic present across virtually every major global automaker. Mobileye is a publicly listed company (Intel subsidiary) supplying standardized camera and perception technology. The absence of any documented Mobileye provision to Israeli state or military bodies in connection with Stellantis vehicles is material.⁸

No confirmed cybersecurity vendor dependency: No named-customer disclosure, press release, SEC filing, or procurement record confirms deployment of Israeli-origin cybersecurity tooling by Stellantis or Jeep. The 2015 Jeep Cherokee remote-exploit incident (a cybersecurity event involving a white-hat research demonstration, not an Israeli-state actor) catalysed industry-wide investment, but confirmed Israeli-specific deployments for Stellantis have not been established in public records.¹³[^29]

Retail surveillance context inapplicable: Jeep is an automotive brand, not a retail operator. The primary deployment contexts for retail-focused biometric technologies (point-of-sale, footfall analytics) do not apply to Jeep’s operational model.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Economic: Economic

Mechanism of Involvement

The Economic audit examined supply chain, sourcing, product origin, investment, capital exposure, operational footprint, and profit repatriation for any documented Israel-Palestine economic nexus.

Documented economic nexus - vehicle import relationship:

Jeep vehicles enter the Israeli market exclusively through Colmobil Corporation Ltd. (TASE-listed, Israeli), the exclusive authorised importer and distributor franchise for Stellantis brands in Israel.^9101718 Revenue flows are structured as follows:

• Wholesale level: Stellantis exports vehicles to Colmobil; wholesale revenue consolidates into Stellantis’s Netherlands-domiciled group financials as export revenue within the MEA (Middle East and Africa) segment - not broken out as a separate Israel line item.³⁶
• Retail level: Colmobil retains the retail margin; these profits are subject to Israeli corporate taxation and flow to Colmobil’s TASE-listed shareholders - Israeli institutional and retail investors.¹⁰¹⁸
• Net directional flow: Israeli retail margin stays within the Israeli economy via Colmobil; Stellantis’s wholesale profit flows to the Netherlands. No profit flow into Israel from Stellantis’s global operations has been identified.³⁶

Absence of direct FDI and operational footprint: No manufacturing plants, data centres, logistics hubs, warehouses, R&D facilities, or real estate holdings in Israel or the occupied territories have been identified. Israeli financial press (Haaretz, Globes, Automotive Fleet Middle East) confirms Stellantis has no manufacturing or warehouse presence in Israeli territory.³²⁰¹²

Supplier chain: Stellantis’s Supplier Code of Conduct (2022) and ESG Report 2023 govern global supply chain frameworks but do not disclose a full Tier 1 supplier registry by country of domicile. No Israeli-domiciled entities are identified as material Tier 1 partners in these documents. Sub-tier supplier confirmation is not possible from public data.¹³¹⁴ The potential Mobileye supply relationship (addressed in Digital) is not confirmed in Stellantis’s public filings or Mobileye SEC disclosures.¹³¹⁴

Settlement economy: No evidence identified of Jeep vehicles or components being sourced from, labelled as originating in, or supplied to Israeli settlements. The Who Profits and Corporate Occupation databases do not cite Jeep or Stellantis in connection with settlement-origin product mislabelling, agricultural sourcing, or settlement construction involvement.¹¹¹⁹ An evidence gap persists regarding whether Colmobil or Samelet operates dealerships within Israeli settlements - neither confirmed nor denied in available English-language sources.

BDS Movement context: BDS Movement materials (2023) reference Stellantis and Jeep in the context of the Israeli vehicle market, but factual allegations do not extend beyond the standard commercial vehicle import relationship documented via Colmobil - no specific supply chain, investment, or operational tie is alleged beyond what is independently documented in corporate and trade sources.²²¹¹¹⁹

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Franchise relationship vs. subsidiary operation: Colmobil and Samelet are independent Israeli corporations - TASE-listed in Colmobil’s case. They are not wholly owned Stellantis subsidiaries. The profits and tax contributions from Jeep sales in Israel flow to Israeli-incorporated entities and their Israeli shareholders, not to a Stellantis-controlled Israeli operating entity.^9101718 No direct legal entity registration for Stellantis in Israel has been identified; the Israeli Tax Authority company registry does not reflect a Stellantis registration.³

Absence of settlement-specific involvement: No NGO investigation, UN reporting, or documented civil-society allegation has identified Jeep or Stellantis in connection with settlement construction, demolition, real estate development, settlement services, or settlement-linked natural resources. The settlement-focused UN OHCHR database (updated September 2025) does not list Jeep, Stellantis, or the named Israeli importers.¹³¹⁴²⁴

Absence of Israeli R&D or strategic investment: No acquisition of Israeli technology companies, no strategic investments in Israeli venture funds, no Israeli innovation lab participation has been documented for Stellantis or its predecessors.²⁰ The Israel Innovation Authority MOU (addressed in Political) covers civilian automotive technology cooperation - driving assistance, cybersecurity, Industry 4.0 - and does not constitute a capital investment or operational presence in Israel.

No distinctive Israeli market characterisation: Stellantis’s 2023 Annual Report and Q4 2023 Investor Presentation aggregate the MEA region as a single reporting segment. Israel is not separately identified as a strategic growth market, regional hub, or export priority in any investor-facing document reviewed.³⁶

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Political: Political

Mechanism of Involvement

The Political audit examined corporate communications, operational presence in occupied territories, governance, lobbying, advocacy, brand heritage, and executive footprint for any documented political nexus.

Israel Innovation Authority MOU (7–8 April 2021): Stellantis (via FCA Italy S.p.A.) and the Israel Innovation Authority - described as “the governmental agency responsible for Israel’s innovation policy” - signed a Memorandum of Understanding under the Authority’s Collaborative Framework with Multinational Corporations Program.⁵⁶ The MOU establishes a framework for civilian automotive technology cooperation: the Authority identifies Israeli technology companies matching Stellantis’s needs and provides R&D funding to Israeli startups; Stellantis provides investment, personnel, equipment, and strategic guidance. Initial collaboration areas cited were driving assistance, cybersecurity, and Industry 4.0.⁵ The agreement was signed by Israel Innovation Authority Chairman Dr. Ami Applebaum; Stellantis figures Roberto Fedeli (CEO of the FCA Research Centre) and Roberto Di Stefano are quoted. Italian Ambassador to Israel Gianluigi Benedetti stated “Italy has re-confirmed itself as a privileged partner for Israel.”⁶ This is a partnership with an Israeli state innovation agency; the Economic and Digital audits also address this relationship.

Corporate communications on the conflict: No public evidence identified of any named, dated corporate statement by Jeep or Stellantis addressing the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack, subsequent Israeli military operations in Gaza, or the Israel-Palestine conflict as a geopolitical matter. Reviews of the Stellantis corporate newsroom and press-release index in June 2026 identified no statement on the conflict.³⁴ By contrast, Stellantis issued a named, dated press release on 19 April 2022 condemning the Russian invasion of Ukraine and announcing suspension of Kaluga manufacturing operations, having earlier halted Russian imports and exports.⁸⁹ This contrast is recorded as a factual matter of corporate communications record.

Lobbying and advocacy: No evidence identified in OpenSecrets or press records of Stellantis lobbying expenditure or PAC contributions specifically directed at Israel-Palestine policy, anti-BDS legislation, or Israel-related trade legislation.²⁴ No leadership role, membership, or documented participation in geopolitical pressure groups focused on the region has been identified. No corporate donations, sponsorships, or material contributions to parastatal Israeli organisations, settlement-financing groups, or Israeli military-welfare funds (e.g., FIDF, JNF) have been documented.³⁴

Settlement presence: Neither Jeep nor Stellantis is listed in the UN OHCHR settlement-business database (A/HRC/60/19, September 2025; 158 enterprises). No evidence identified of any Samelet or Colmobil showroom or service facility located within an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank.¹¹¹³¹⁴ No direct or purpose-built corporate supply arrangement to settlement communities or Israeli security forces beyond the documented civilian retail franchise relationship has been identified.

BDS campaign targeting: Jeep/Stellantis is not named in the BDS National Committee’s “Guide to BDS Boycott” (December 2024), whose named targets include Chevron, Intel, HP, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, and Maersk - but no automotive manufacturer.¹⁷ Jeep/Stellantis is likewise not named on the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR) 2025 BDS boycott resource.¹⁸ A third-party consumer-boycott aggregator (boykotmarket.com) does list Jeep, citing the Israel Innovation Authority MOU as its stated basis; this is a campaign-aggregator listing, not an official BNC or USCPR target designation.²⁰

Executive footprint: No evidence identified of personal donations, public statements, organisational affiliations, or advocacy roles relating to the Israel-Palestine conflict by CEO Antonio Filosa, Executive Chairman John Elkann, or any Stellantis board member or C-suite executive.²¹¹²

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Civilian character of the Israel Innovation Authority MOU: The MOU covers civilian automotive technology cooperation - driving assistance, cybersecurity, Industry 4.0. It is not a defence procurement, security cooperation, or military technology transfer agreement. The Digital audit confirms no defence or dual-use technology provision has been identified in connection with this engagement.⁵¹⁷ The MOU is a technology-sourcing and R&D cooperation framework of the kind routinely signed between global OEMs and national innovation agencies.

Absence of named BDS targeting: Jeep/Stellantis is not listed by the BDS National Committee or USCPR - the principal BDS campaign coordination bodies. The absence from these lists, while not dispositive, is consistent with the audit’s finding that the primary documented nexus is the commercial import relationship and the historical military licensing arrangement, neither of which has generated sustained organised campaign pressure at the level of Intel, HP, or Caterpillar.¹⁷¹⁸

No operational presence in occupied territories: No owned or operated facilities within Israeli settlements have been identified. No settlement-specific supply chain, procurement, or service arrangement has been documented. The UN OHCHR settlement-business database - the principal intergovernmental record of settlement-linked business activity - does not list Jeep or Stellantis.¹³¹⁴

Consistent corporate communications standard: Stellantis’s decision not to issue a named statement on the Israel-Palestine conflict is not exceptional among multinational corporations. The contrast with its Russia/Ukraine statement reflects the specific geopolitical context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the operational impact on Stellantis’s Kaluga manufacturing plant - a concrete operational consideration not replicated in the Israel-Palestine context, where Stellantis maintains no Israeli operations.⁸⁹

Named Entities and Evidence Map

BDS-1000 Score (V4)

• V_MAX: 3.98 Sum_OTHERS: 3.47
• BRS Score: 292 Tier: D (Moderate)

The Military domain drives V_MAX (3.98), reflecting the documented 35-year military-vehicle licensing relationship between Chrysler/Jeep/Stellantis and Automotive Industries Ltd. (AIL), through which Jeep Wrangler-derived tactical vehicles have been produced and supplied to the IDF since 1990. The Political score is elevated by the Israel Innovation Authority MOU (P=7, reflecting direct engagement with an Israeli state agency) combined with M=7 (an established formal institutional agreement), while I=2 reflects the civilian, non-defence character of the cooperation. Digital is zero across all subcategories: no confirmed Israeli technology vendor dependency, no surveillance technology deployment, and no digital-nexus vectors have been established in public records. The Economic score reflects the franchise importer relationship with directional profit flows documented as net outward from Israel at the Stellantis level. The BRS of 292 and Tier D placement reflect a genuine, documented military licensing nexus alongside a broadly commercial economic relationship and no confirmed technology or settlement-specific involvement.

Methodology Note

• Evidence-only basis: Every factual claim in this dossier traces to an identified source in the four domain audits (Military, Digital, Economic, Political). “No public evidence identified” is used where checks found nothing; this formulation carries no inference of absence.
• Scale-free Impact scoring: V-Domain scores derive from three independent dimensions - Impact (I = activity type, classified on a fixed scale), Magnitude (M = scale/scope), and Proximity (P = directness of involvement) - multiplied as a scale-free composite. The highest single-domain score becomes V_MAX; BRS = V_MAX × (Sum of all domain scores × 100).
• Temporal rule: Operations divested or exited before the reference period are discounted; the AIL licensing relationship is documented as ongoing and has not been divested.
• Entity attribution: No transitive guilt applies - subsidiaries, franchisees, and licensees are assessed on their own documented conduct; the AIL licence is attributed to the licensing relationship (Military) but AIL’s broader defence manufacturing is not attributed to Jeep/Stellantis.
• Settlement operations: Where an entity operates both within Israel proper and in settlements, the settlement component is counted in both Economic and Political. No settlement-specific Jeep/Stellantis operations have been identified.
• Digital methodology: Confirmed commercial OEM-Tier 1 supplier relationships (e.g., Mobileye ADAS) are recorded as documented facts with noted absence of Israeli state-provision nexus; absence of confirmed vendor contracts is recorded as “no public evidence identified,” not as confirmation of non-use.

End Notes