Key Findings
- Economic: DBIO V reported US$5.183 billion in Lloyds Banking Group loans and underwriting concerning 104 selected settlement-linked businesses for January 2023–August 2025; the report does not say that this capital was earmarked for settlement activity.1
- Economic: Civil-society research identifies Lloyds as a financier of major arms companies supplying Israel, including Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin and Rolls-Royce, through general corporate lending and underwriting rather than identified Israel-directed facilities.2
- Political: A February 2026 tribunal dismissed discrimination claims by two employees disciplined over pro-Palestine internal posts, but described Lloyds’ disciplinary response as “heavy handed” and found the FCA reporting disproportionate.3
- Not found: No public evidence identified of Lloyds military contracting, Israeli or occupied-territory operations, Israeli-domiciled technology procurement, or Israel/Palestine-specific public advocacy.4
Target Profile
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Lloyds Banking Group plc |
| Jurisdiction | Scotland, United Kingdom; incorporated 21 October 1985 (company number SC095000).5 |
| Headquarters | Principal executive office: 33 Old Broad Street, London; registered office: The Mound, Edinburgh.6 |
| Sector | Retail, commercial, insurance, pensions, investment and financial-services group.6 |
| Ownership | Listed on the London Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange (LSE: LLOY; NYSE: LYG). As at 5 February 2026, reported notified holdings included BlackRock, Inc. (5.14%) and Norges Bank (3.02%); no shareholder at or above 10% was listed in that Form 20-F table.6 |
| Key Executives / Governance | Charlie Nunn, Group Chief Executive; William Chalmers, Chief Financial Officer; Sir Robin Budenberg, Chair.7 |
| Israeli-Nexus Summary | Documented nexus is principally group-level lending, underwriting and investment relationships with arms and settlement-linked companies identified by civil-society research; no in-country Lloyds operation or direct Israel-specific military, digital, or sovereign-financing relationship was identified.1, 2, 4 |
Key Facts:
- Principal relevant subsidiaries include Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, HBOS plc, Scottish Widows Limited, Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets plc and LBG Equity Investments Limited; Halifax is a trading division of Bank of Scotland plc.6
- The UK Government completed divestment of its Lloyds shareholding in May 2017.8
- Scottish Widows is Lloyds’ insurance and asset-management arm and reported approximately £232 billion of assets under administration in 2025.9
Executive Summary
Lloyds Banking Group is a UK-focused banking and financial-services group. The evidence record identifies its principal Israel/Palestine nexus in institutional finance: lending, bond underwriting and other group-level financial relationships with international arms companies supplying Israel, and with businesses selected by the Don’t Buy into Occupation (DBIO) research programme for documented settlement-related activity or relationships. These findings concern financial relationships with corporate groups; they do not establish that Lloyds funded a particular Israeli military procurement, settlement project, or occupied-territory operation.1, 2
The strongest documented economic finding is DBIO V’s reported US$4.294 billion in loans and US$889 million in underwriting - US$5.183 billion total - concerning 104 selected businesses from January 2023 to August 2025. DBIO states that the selected businesses also operate outside occupied territory and does not claim that all capital flows were directed to occupied-territory activities. The earlier DBIO IV report recorded US$1.283 billion in aggregate loans and underwriting for January 2021 to August/September 2024, but its accessible text did not provide a Lloyds recipient schedule, deal-level amounts, or establish a direct relationship with a named OHCHR-listed company.1, 10
Separate PAX/Profundo, BankTrack, Ethical Consumer and nuclear-weapons-financing research identifies Lloyds as a financier of companies that export weapons or military systems to Israel. The cited lending and underwriting are general corporate facilities, not ringfenced Israel-directed transactions. Lloyds’ stated defence policy excludes several categories of controversial weapons and nuclear-weapons support outside UK, US and French national programmes, but the policy applies to lending and does not categorically exclude conventional weapons manufacturers or extend to asset-management activity.2, 11
The political record is primarily one of limited public positioning and internal workplace disputes. No public statement specifically addressing 7 October 2023, Israel’s Gaza campaign, or the broader conflict was identified in the audit search. The February 2026 tribunal outcome did not uphold the employees’ discrimination claims, while nonetheless finding Lloyds’ disciplinary approach excessive in important respects. No public evidence identified Lloyds branches, offices, licensed operations, employees, revenue lines or real estate in Israel or occupied territory; direct military procurement, Israeli surveillance-vendor deployment and Israel-specific sovereign-debt underwriting were likewise not identified.3, 4
On the fixed V6.5 assessment, Lloyds receives BRS 522 and Tier C (Substantial Complicity). This result is driven by the economic evidence - especially continuing reported group-level financial relationships with DBIO-selected settlement-linked businesses and finance for arms companies supplying Israel - rather than direct operational, military, or digital activity in Israel or the occupied Palestinian territory.
Timeline of Relevant Events
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| November 2008 | Lloyds TSB, then clearing bank for the Islamic Bank of Britain, required it to cease dealings with Interpal or risk closure of its clearing account. No public reason was stated; Interpal was subsequently cleared again by the Charity Commission in February 2009.12 |
| 2015–2019 | Ethical Consumer reported approximately €4.13 billion in Lloyds loans to arms companies during this historical period.13 |
| January 2021–August/September 2024 | DBIO IV reported US$1.270 billion in loans and US$12 million in underwriting by Lloyds to selected settlement-linked companies; the report contains a one-month discrepancy between its narrative and table caption.10 |
| May 2021 | Two Lloyds employees posted pro-Palestine messages on an internal communications channel; Lloyds investigated, sanctioned and reported them to the FCA for alleged gross misconduct.14 |
| 23 July 2021 | Ithaca Energy announced refinancing comprising a US$625 million senior-notes offering and US$1.225 billion in reserve-based lending commitments. Reporting named Lloyds among underwriters, though Ithaca’s announcement did not name the underwriting banks.15 |
| January 2021–August 2023 | Nuclear-weapons-divestment research reported £2.7 billion in Lloyds loans and bond underwriting across seven nuclear-weapons producers, including General Dynamics, Rolls-Royce, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Airbus.11 |
| June 2023 | Lloyds Bank subsequently declined or closed accounts of Anas al-Tikriti and/or the Cordoba Foundation after NatWest and RBS had terminated the foundation’s accounts. Lloyds gave no public explanation.16 |
| 16 May 2024 | Tipping Point activists disrupted Lloyds’ Glasgow AGM, demanding divestment from fossil-fuel companies and firms alleged to be complicit in Israeli occupation; no Israel/arms divestment resolution was reported as tabled or voted on.17 |
| June 2024 | PAX/Profundo published research on European finance for six arms companies supplying Israel; Lloyds appeared in the underlying dataset as an active financier.2 |
| November 2025 | DBIO V reported US$5.183 billion in Lloyds loans and underwriting concerning 104 selected businesses for January 2023–August 2025.1 |
| February 2026 | Employment Tribunal reporting stated that Lloyds won the employees’ discrimination claims, but that its disciplinary response and FCA reporting had gone too far.3 |
Corporate Overview
Lloyds Banking Group plc is a Scotland-incorporated, UK-listed financial-services holding company. Its reported structure is concentrated in UK retail banking, commercial banking, insurance, pensions and investment activities. Lloyds TSB acquired HBOS in January 2009 and subsequently became Lloyds Banking Group plc.5, 6
The relevant group includes Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, HBOS plc, Scottish Widows Limited and Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets plc. Scottish Widows manages funds directly and through third-party managers, including BlackRock. Public materials reviewed in the audits identify the United Kingdom as the principal area of operation for these key subsidiaries.6, 9
No public evidence identified in the reviewed corporate filings of an Israeli incorporation, headquarters, tax residency, controlling Israeli subsidiary, Israeli state ownership, Israeli beneficial control, Israeli operating office, or a branch in Israel, the West Bank or Gaza. Lloyds’ related-undertakings materials listed entities or locations in the UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Jersey, Luxembourg and India, but no Israel, Tel Aviv or Jerusalem entry. This is document-scoped and does not exclude immaterial relationships not listed in those materials.6
Lloyds agreed to acquire Curve, a London-registered digital-wallet fintech founded by Israeli-born entrepreneur Shachar Bialick, for approximately £120 million in 2025. The transaction concerns a UK-domiciled company and does not establish acquisition of an Israeli operating subsidiary or an operational relationship with Israel or occupied territory.18
Domain Summaries
Military: Military
Mechanism of Involvement
No public evidence identified that Lloyds manufactures, procures, supplies or services military equipment; holds Israeli Ministry of Defence or IDF contracts; operates military logistics or base services; or directly finances a specific weapons system, export contract or procurement programme for Israel.4
The documented military-adjacent nexus is general corporate financing. PAX/Profundo examined financial relationships with Boeing, General Dynamics, Leonardo, Lockheed Martin, RTX and Rolls-Royce - companies exporting weapons or military systems to Israel - and listed Lloyds as an active financier in its underlying dataset. Ethical Consumer subsequently assessed Lloyds as the sixth-largest European creditor of companies supplying weapons to Israel and 35th among the 100 international bank financiers in the cited Gaza-linked arms-export research.2
Nuclear-weapons-financing research separately reported £2.7 billion in Lloyds loans and bond underwriting for seven producers between January 2021 and August 2023. These figures include General Dynamics (£668 million), Rolls-Royce (£620 million), Lockheed Martin (£559 million), Boeing (£380 million), Airbus (£334 million), Peraton (£95 million) and BAE Systems (£72 million).11
Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits
The financing evidence concerns credit facilities and underwriting extended to corporate entities with diverse global operations. It is not evidence that funds were ringfenced for Israeli exports, Israeli military use, or any named weapons platform. No public evidence identifies Lloyds as financier of a dedicated Israeli procurement facility or export-credit transaction.2, 11
Lloyds’ stated defence-sector policy excludes financing for cluster munitions, anti-personnel landmines, biological and toxin weapons, chemical weapons and permanent blinding laser weapons. It also restricts nuclear-weapons financing outside UK, US and French national programmes. The stated exception permits lending connected with those three national programmes, and the policy does not extend to asset-management activities.11
Scottish Widows maintains an exclusions policy for controversial-weapons manufacturers and certain ESG-failing companies, and announced divestments under its policy. No public evidence identified direct Scottish Widows equity stakes in Elbit Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems or other Israeli-domiciled defence companies; neither do public disclosures establish the complete composition of its 2024–2026 holdings in the international defence companies cited above.19
Named Entities and Evidence Map
- Lloyds Banking Group: Reported general financier/underwriter to arms companies supplying Israel; no identified direct Israeli defence contract.2
- Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin and Rolls-Royce: Named in the PAX/Profundo and Ethical Consumer evidence as companies supplying Israel for which Lloyds had financing relationships.2
- BAE Systems, Airbus and Peraton: Named in the nuclear-weapons-financing dataset; that dataset does not establish Israel-directed financing.11
- Scottish Widows: Lloyds asset-management subsidiary with controversial-weapons exclusions; no identified direct Israeli-defence holdings.19
Digital: Digital
Mechanism of Involvement
Lloyds’ documented technology estate is primarily UK- and US-oriented. Its disclosed partnerships include Google Cloud, Oracle, Microsoft, FICO, IBM, Thought Machine, Yoti, Aveni and UnlikelyAI. Google Cloud supports Lloyds’ Vertex AI use; Oracle Database@Azure and Microsoft services support infrastructure; and Lloyds’ proprietary Envoy and Dynamic Risk Engine support fraud and financial-crime activity.20
Lloyds launched Lloyds Bank Smart ID with UK digital-identity company Yoti in 2023. The app uses facial-biometric liveness detection to link a user’s face with identification documents. The audit identified Yoti as UK-domiciled and found no identified Israeli connection.21
No public evidence identified of Lloyds using Check Point products, NICE Actimize, Israeli-origin AI vendors, Israeli surveillance technology, Israeli sovereign-cloud programmes, Israeli data-centre processing, Unit 8200-linked vendors, or an Israeli technology hub or R&D presence. Third-party commentary has associated Lloyds with CyberArk deployments, but Lloyds has not publicly confirmed a CyberArk contract and the claim was not independently verified.20
Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits
The Curve acquisition does not establish a digital nexus with Israeli state, military or intelligence structures. Curve is a London-domiciled, UK-registered company. Its founder’s prior Israeli special-forces service is biographical context, not evidence of an ongoing operational relationship between Lloyds and Israeli defence or intelligence bodies.18
Lloyds’ financial-crime and AI systems serve banking purposes - identity checks, transaction analysis, credit decisioning, scam-risk assessment and money-mule detection. IBM’s quantum trial was described as an experimental civil-financial application. No public evidence identified an Israeli defence or surveillance application of these systems.20
Named Entities and Evidence Map
- Google Cloud, Oracle, Microsoft, FICO and IBM: Documented US-domiciled technology and enterprise-service relationships, not Israeli vendors.20
- Yoti, Thought Machine, Aveni and UnlikelyAI: Documented UK-domiciled technology partners or investees; no Israel nexus identified in the audits.20, 21
- Curve / Shachar Bialick: UK-domiciled acquisition target; Israeli-born founder and former special-forces member, but no evidence of an Israeli operational entity or defence relationship.18
- CyberArk / NICE Actimize / Check Point: No verified Lloyds public deployment disclosure; CyberArk commentary remains unconfirmed.20
Economic: Economic
Mechanism of Involvement
DBIO IV reported aggregate Lloyds financial relationships totalling US$1.283 billion with selected settlement-linked companies during January 2021–August/September 2024. DBIO V later reported US$5.183 billion in Lloyds loans and underwriting concerning 104 selected businesses for January 2023–August 2025. DBIO’s selection criteria require public documentation in at least one of the UN database, Who Profits or AFSC Investigate, recent evidence of relevant activity, and a European financial relationship.1, 10
The reports use group-attribution and financial-data methodology. They describe total group-level creditor exposure to selected companies that have activity in, or business relationships with, settlements. DBIO V does not claim that all capital flows were directed to occupied-territory activity; neither accessible DBIO IV text nor the cited audit material supplies a Lloyds recipient-by-recipient schedule sufficient to establish an earmarked settlement transaction or a direct relationship with a named OHCHR-listed business.1, 10
Arms-company finance is also an economic exposure. Ethical Consumer cited the PAX/Profundo research and ranked Lloyds sixth among European creditors of companies supplying weapons to Israel. Historical research reported approximately €4.13 billion in Lloyds loans to arms companies in 2015–2019.2, 13
The Ferret reported Lloyds among banks underwriting a 2021 Ithaca Energy transaction. Ithaca’s own announcement confirmed the refinancing and stated that proceeds included repayment of a US$250 million Delek shareholder loan, but did not name Lloyds as an underwriter. Delek was listed in the 2020 OHCHR database; the public evidence establishes a reported Lloyds relationship with Ithaca, not a direct Lloyds loan or underwriting to Delek Group itself.15
Lloyds provides an International Trade Portal with an Israel country section for business clients. The portal provides trade and investment-environment guidance and does not distinguish Israel’s internationally recognised territory from the occupied West Bank. This is trade-information facilitation, not evidence of an in-country Lloyds operation.22
Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits
No public evidence identified that Lloyds underwrites Israeli sovereign debt, Israel Bonds or Israeli war bonds; holds Israeli sovereign debt in its banking book; or has Scottish Widows own-balance-sheet holdings of Israeli sovereign bonds. Public fund disclosures do not quantify every underlying passive-index position, so the absence of a named holding does not prove that no immaterial index exposure exists.6, 9
No public evidence identified that Lloyds directly sources Israeli- or settlement-manufactured products as a routine purchasing category, sells or imports settlement goods, or operates retail or wholesale branches, licensed subsidiaries, research centres, employees, tax registrations, revenue lines or real estate in Israel or occupied territory.4, 6
The 2021 Ithaca underwriting allegation should not be overstated. Its public evidence is a reported fee-earning capital-markets role for a UK North Sea company’s refinancing, rather than documented long-term ownership or lending in Delek’s settlement-linked operations. The issuer’s announcement corroborates the refinancing and Delek connection, but not Lloyds’ role.15
Named Entities and Evidence Map
- DBIO-selected companies: DBIO IV and V report aggregate Lloyds exposure to selected settlement-linked businesses; public audit material does not name the individual Lloyds recipients.1, 10
- Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin and Rolls-Royce: Arms-company finance cited by PAX/Profundo and Ethical Consumer; no earmarked Israel financing identified.2
- Ithaca Energy / Delek Group: Reported Lloyds underwriting of Ithaca; Delek’s OHCHR-listing connection does not establish a direct Lloyds-Delek financial relationship.15
- Scottish Widows: Asset-management subsidiary; broad funds may have unquantified passive exposure, but no specific Israeli holdings were publicly disclosed.9
Political: Political
Mechanism of Involvement
No public statement by Lloyds Banking Group, Lloyds Bank, Halifax, Bank of Scotland or Scottish Widows specifically addressing 7 October 2023, Israel’s subsequent Gaza campaign, or the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict was identified in the audited search. No public statement by Charlie Nunn on Gaza, Israeli military operations or Palestinian civilian casualties was identified.4
The clearest documented political/communications issue concerns the employee disciplinary proceedings. Afra Sohail and Aungbeen Khalid were investigated after May 2021 internal posts expressing solidarity with Palestinians and criticising Israeli government actions. Lloyds sanctioned them and referred them to the FCA for alleged gross misconduct. In February 2026, the tribunal dismissed their discrimination claims, but held that removing the posts was justified because of workplace polarisation while finding the disciplinary response, particularly FCA reporting, went too far and was “heavy handed.”3, 14
At the May 2024 AGM, activists demanded that Lloyds rule out investments in companies operating in occupied Palestinian territory. Sir Robin Budenberg had protesters removed; public reporting identified no substantive management response to the allegations and no formal Israel/arms divestment resolution voted upon.17
Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits
The tribunal did not find that Lloyds discriminated unlawfully against the employees on the claims before it. Its reasoning accepted that the workplace context and polarising subject matter could justify removing the posts. It also found that neither claimant held the relevant protected anti-Zionist philosophical belief at the time of the 2021 messages, though it affirmed that anti-Zionism can in principle constitute a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010.3
Lloyds states that it does not make political donations to, or campaign for, political parties in any country. No evidence identified donations to Conservative Friends of Israel, Labour Friends of Israel or comparable Israel/Palestine-linked political groups; no lobbying related to Israel/Palestine policy, arms-export licensing or associated geopolitical issues was identified.23
The Cordoba Foundation episode and the earlier Lloyds TSB/Interpal episode are specific account-access disputes, not evidence of a general Lloyds policy directed at all Israel/Palestine-linked customers. No public evidence identified a conflict-specific retail-banking embargo, product restriction or service suspension beyond the documented episodes.12, 16
Named Entities and Evidence Map
- Afra Sohail and Aungbeen Khalid: Lloyds employees disciplined over internal pro-Palestine posts; tribunal dismissed their discrimination claims but criticised the proportionality of Lloyds’ sanctions.3, 14
- Tipping Point UK: Activist group that disrupted the 2024 AGM over divestment demands; allegations at the meeting were activist claims, not findings adopted by Lloyds.17
- Cordoba Foundation / Anas al-Tikriti: Subject of reported account closures or refusals; Lloyds gave no public explanation.16
- Interpal / Islamic Bank of Britain: Historical 2008–2009 clearing-account dispute involving Lloyds TSB; distinct from current operations and preceding the present group structure.12
BDS-1000 Score
Method: V6.5.
| Domain | I | M | P | V-Domain Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Digital | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Economic | 6.10 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 6.10 |
| Political | 5.00 | 3.50 | 9.00 | 2.50 |
- V_MAX: 6.10 Avg_OTHERS: 0.83
- BRS Score: 522 Tier: C (Substantial Complicity)
V_MAX is driven by Economic: reported, continuing group-level financing relationships with DBIO-selected settlement-linked businesses and documented financing of arms companies supplying Israel. The Political score reflects the internal-post disciplinary record and related public accountability issues, while the evidence does not support a scored direct military or digital nexus. The method is scale-free, evidence-only and human-vetted; it does not infer direct complicity from ordinary corporate association where the record does not establish it.
Methodology Note
- Evidence is limited to the four supplied domain audits and their cited source record; allegations not verified in those audits are excluded or retained only with their stated qualification.
- Impact (I) concerns the activity type, M concerns scale, and P concerns directness; the scores are not a measure of company size, public controversy, or moral intent.
- Financing is attributed to Lloyds only as documented financial activity. Borrowers’, investees’ and vendors’ own conduct is not automatically attributed to Lloyds.
- Divested, exited or historical operations are treated as mitigating context rather than evidence of current conduct; the historical Lloyds TSB/Interpal episode is accordingly distinguished from present group activity.
- Settlement-related operations may be relevant to both Economic and Political, but direct military, digital or in-country presence is not presumed from financial exposure.
- “No public evidence identified” is used where the audits found no supporting public record, including direct Israeli military contracts, Israeli operations, Israel-specific sovereign financing and verified Israeli technology procurement.
Footnotes
-
https://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/download/2025/11/25/dbio-novemebr-2025-1764074548.pdf ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8
-
https://paxforpeace.nl/publications/the-companies-arming-israel-and-their-financiers/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11
-
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-10/lloyds-wins-lawsuit-over-employee-pro-palestine-posts-punishment ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC095000 ↩ ↩2
-
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/lloyds-banking-group-plc/2025/q4/2025-lbg-form-20f.pdf ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9
-
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/who-we-are/group-overview/directors-and-governance.html ↩
-
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-shareholding-in-lloyds-banking-group ↩
-
https://www.scottishwidows.co.uk/about-us/media-centre/press-releases/scottish-widows-powers-up-profit.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024_DBIO-IV-report.pdf ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5
-
https://nukedivestmentscotland.org/lloyds-banking-group/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
https://acams.org/en/news/lloyds-tsb-forces-british-bank-to-drop-accounts-of-palestinian-charity ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/banks-weapons ↩ ↩2
-
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uk-muslim-women-sue-lloyds-tsb-after-bank-fires-them-pro-palestine-posts ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.ithacaenergy.com/press-releases/ithaca-energy-receives-rbl-facility-commitments-and-prices-offering-of-senior-notes ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
https://umbrellanews.com.au/finance-2/2023/10/what-reputation-do-the-banks-have-left-to-risk/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1047734/lloyds-agm-crashed-by-pro-palestinian-and-climate-protestors-1047734.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.pymnts.com/acquisitions/2025/lloyds-acquires-united-kingdom-digital-wallet-fintech-curve/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.pionline.com/esg/scottish-widows-cut-570-million-exposures-under-new-policy ↩ ↩2
-
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lloyds-banking-group-accelerates-ai-innovation-with-google-cloud-302424543.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
https://www.biometricupdate.com/202310/lloyds-bank-launches-reusable-digital-id-app-with-yoti-biometrics-and-liveness-detection ↩ ↩2
-
https://www.lloydsbanktrade.com/en/market-potential/israel/investment-environment ↩
-
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/who-we-are/group-overview/public-affairs-policy.html ↩















