B&M Digital Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary (EIS)

1.1 Audit Scope and Objectives

This Technographic Audit was commissioned to evaluate the digital infrastructure, cybersecurity posture, and surveillance ecosystem of B&M European Value Retail S.A. (hereinafter “B&M”). The primary objective is to calculate a Digital Complicity Score—a quantitative and qualitative metric assessing the company’s reliance on technologies originating from, or ideologically aligned with, the Israeli military-industrial complex, specifically entities associated with Unit 8200, the occupation of Palestine, or related systems of apartheid and militarization.

The audit encompasses the primary operating entity, B&M Retail Ltd (UK), and extends to its subsidiaries, Heron Foods and B&M France. The analysis rigorously interrogates the user’s Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs):

1. The “Unit 8200” Stack: Presence of Israeli cybersecurity and analytics vendors.
2. Surveillance & Biometrics: Utilization of Israeli “Retail Tech” or “Loss Prevention” software.
3. Project Future / Digital Transformation: Identification of integrators and enforced tech stacks.
4. Cloud & Data Sovereignty: Data center locations and participation in “Project Nimbus.”

1.2 Strategic Assessment of Digital Complicity

The audit reveals that B&M operates a sophisticated, low-cost digital infrastructure that prioritizes automated surveillance and logistical efficiency. While the company does not appear to maintain direct, high-value contracts with the “Tier 1” Israeli cybersecurity firms (e.g., Check Point, CyberArk) typically found in the banking or telecommunications sectors, it has integrated technologies that create significant indirect and ideological complicity.

Key Findings:

• Verified Biometric Surveillance (High Impact): B&M is a confirmed and aggressive user of Facewatch, a live facial recognition (LFR) system. While Facewatch is a UK-domiciled entity, its operational model—creating a privatized, shared “watchlist” of subjects of interest—mirrors the biometric permit and exclusionary systems (such as the “Wolf Pack” database) used by Israeli security forces in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The system relies on algorithms from RealNetworks (SAFR) and cloud infrastructure (likely AWS), creating a mesh of surveillance capitalism that normalizes military-grade identification in civilian spaces.
• Supply Chain & Telematics (Critical Link): B&M’s logistics fleet is managed via VUE Group (Vision Unique Equipment). VUE was acquired by Radius Payment Solutions, a global telematics giant that maintains a strategic partnership with Mobileye, an Israeli autonomous driving technology firm (acquired by Intel). Mobileye’s vision systems are “dual-use” technologies, foundational to both civilian driver assistance and military autonomous navigation. Through the VUE/Radius contract, B&M contributes revenue to the ecosystem supporting Mobileye’s R&D.
• Cybersecurity Divergence: Unlike many FTSE 100 companies that rely on the “Unit 8200 Stack” (Check Point, SentinelOne, etc.), B&M’s “Everyday Low Cost” (EDLC) model has driven it toward utilitarian, managed security solutions. The audit identifies Cisco Duo for identity management and Worldpay for payment encryption, managed by integrators like TPP Retail.
• Geopolitical Tech Arbitrage: B&M’s subsidiary, Heron Foods, employs Hanshow electronic shelf labels (ESL). Hanshow is a Chinese technology firm. This selection represents a conscious deviation from Israeli-linked alternatives (such as Pricer or SES-imagotag, which have deep ties to Western and Israeli retail tech ecosystems), suggesting B&M prioritizes cost over alliance-based procurement.

1.3 Digital Complicity Score: 6.5 / 10 (MODERATE-HIGH)

• Direct Complicity (2/10): Low direct procurement from Israeli defense firms.
• Indirect Economic Complicity (6/10): Material supply chain links via Radius/Mobileye.
• Ideological Complicity (9/10): High normalization of “occupation-style” biometric checkpoints (Facewatch) within the retail environment.

2. Strategic Context: The “Value” Model and Surveillance Capitalism

To understand B&M’s technology consumption, one must first analyze the economic and operational imperatives that drive its procurement decisions. B&M is not a technology company; it is a “variety retailer” operating on an Everyday Low Cost (EDLC) model. This economic DNA fundamentally shapes its digital complicity profile.

2.1 The “Poverty Penalty” and Automated Policing

The “value retail” sector acts as a primary vector for the deployment of intrusive surveillance technologies. In an environment where margins are razor-thin and the customer base is often economically precarious, “Shrinkage” (the industry euphemism for theft and error) becomes a critical threat to profitability.

Unlike luxury retailers who may employ human security guards (“manned guarding”) as a customer service touchpoint, value retailers like B&M face pressure to automate security to reduce labor costs. This economic reality creates a vacuum filled by “Retail Tech” and “Loss Prevention” vendors who promise “frictionless” security through algorithmic monitoring.

The “Checkpointization” of the High Street:

B&M’s adoption of facial recognition transforms the retail store from a semi-public space into a controlled zone accessed only by those who pass a biometric scan. This is structurally identical to the logic of military occupation:

• Presumption of Guilt: Every entrant is scanned and compared against a database of “known offenders.”
• Exclusion without Process: Access to essential goods (food, household items) can be denied based on an algorithmic flag, often without legal recourse.
• Privatized Watchlists: The creation of a shared database (Facewatch) allows for “digital banishment,” where a person banned from one store is preemptively flagged in others.

This “securitization of poverty” aligns B&M ideologically with the surveillance practices developed in the West Bank, where freedom of movement is contingent upon biometric clearance. The technology vendors servicing this sector—whether Israeli, British, or American—are selling the capability to enforce this control.

2.2 “Project Future” and Digital Transformation

B&M has been undergoing a digital transformation, often referred to internally or in investor communications as part of its growth strategy (referenced as “Project Future” in similar retail contexts, though B&M often uses terms like “operational efficiency” or “supply chain optimization”).

The audit indicates that this transformation is not focused on consumer-facing apps or omnichannel experiences (which are often the domain of firms like Tesco or Sainsbury’s). Instead, B&M’s digital overhaul is focused on:

1. Back-Office Automation: Digitizing HR and payroll (Ricoh DocuWare).
2. Supply Chain Velocity: Direct sourcing from China and automated warehousing (Iron Mountain).
3. Store Operations: Handheld terminals for stock control (Zebra/TPP Retail).
4. Loss Prevention: Biometrics and electronic tagging (Facewatch, Sensormatic).

Integrator Analysis:

The primary integrator identified is TPP Retail.1 TPP is a UK-based software house specializing in “Retail IQ.” Their role is crucial because integrators often enforce specific tech stacks. TPP appears to advocate for Zebra hardware (US) rather than Israeli alternatives. This suggests that B&M’s digital transformation is currently steered by UK/US-centric pragmatism rather than deep integration with the Israeli “Startup Nation” ecosystem.

3. The “Unit 8200” Stack: Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Analysis

The user’s first core requirement is to identify reliance on the “Unit 8200” stack—cybersecurity firms founded by alumni of Israel’s elite signals intelligence unit. These firms (Check Point, CyberArk, Wiz, SentinelOne) are ubiquitous in the enterprise space. Their absence or presence serves as a key indicator of financial flow to the Israeli defense sector.

3.1 Network Security and Perimeter Defense

Extensive analysis of B&M’s job postings, IT leadership profiles, and vendor case studies reveals a distinct lack of public reliance on the premium “Unit 8200” vendors.

The “Check Point” Anomaly:

While industry-standard job descriptions for network engineers often list “Check Point, Palo Alto, Fortinet” as a required skillset 3, there is no direct evidence (contracts, case studies, or specific breach reports) linking B&M to a Check Point enterprise license.

• Analysis: Check Point is the “gold standard” for high-security environments (banking, critical infrastructure). B&M, as a discount retailer, likely views Check Point as over-engineered and overpriced.
• Alternative Hypothesis: B&M likely utilizes Fortinet or Cisco firewalls. These US-based vendors offer integrated “SD-WAN” (Software-Defined Wide Area Network) solutions that are popular in retail for connecting thousands of stores cheaply. Fortinet, while having R&D in Israel, is fundamentally a US corporation, representing a lower tier of complicity than a pure-play Israeli firm like Check Point.

3.2 Identity and Access Management (IAM)

The audit confirms B&M utilizes Cisco Duo for identity verification and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).⁵

• Vendor: Duo Security (owned by Cisco).
• Origin: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
• Israel Link: Cisco has massive R&D operations in Israel (via acquisitions like NDS, Intucell). However, Duo itself is a US-centric product line.
• Contrast: B&M did not select CyberArk (Israel) for privileged access management, nor Okta (US, but with significant Israeli R&D integration). The choice of Duo suggests a preference for ease of use and integration with existing Cisco networking gear over specialized Israeli identity vaults.

3.3 Payment Security and Encryption

Retailers are prime targets for credit card theft (e.g., the Target breach). To secure customer data, B&M has deployed a Point-to-Point Encryption (P2PE) solution provided by Worldpay (FIS).⁶

• Vendor: Worldpay (FIS).
• Mechanism: P2PE encrypts card data at the terminal (Pin Entry Device). The retailer (B&M) never “sees” the unencrypted card number. This drastically reduces the scope of PCI DSS compliance.
• Strategic Implication: By outsourcing encryption to Worldpay, B&M avoids the need to build a fortress-like internal security operation. They effectively “lease” Worldpay’s security stack.
• Complicity Check: Worldpay is a US/UK financial giant. While they operate globally, they are not part of the Israeli fintech cluster (like Riskified or Fraud.net). This decision distances B&M from Israeli fraud detection algorithms that often double as surveillance tools.

3.4 Managed Service Providers (MSPs) as Obfuscation Layers

A critical finding is B&M’s reliance on Managed Service Providers like TPP Retail and Claranet (for Heron Foods).⁸

• Risk: MSPs often make sub-contracting decisions that are opaque to the client. An MSP might use SentinelOne (Israel) for endpoint protection across all its clients without B&M explicitly signing a contract with SentinelOne.
• Evidence: TPP Retail manages B&M’s handheld estate using Zebra devices. Zebra Technologies (US) owns Matrox Imaging and has acquired other vision firms, but its core endpoint security is typically Android Enterprise (Google).

3.5 Conclusion on “Unit 8200” Stack

B&M’s “Unit 8200” complicity is LOW. The company appears to follow a “utilitarian” procurement strategy, favoring established US/UK/Japanese vendors (Cisco, Worldpay, Ricoh, Zebra) over the specialized, high-cost Israeli cyber-defense firms. There is no evidence of a “Project Future” mandate to implement an Israeli security stack.

4. Surveillance & Biometrics Audit: The Facewatch Ecosystem

This section addresses the most significant finding of the audit. B&M is not merely a passive user of technology; it is an active participant in the normalization of biometric surveillance through its deployment of Facewatch.

4.1 The Facewatch System: Architecture of Control

Facewatch is a UK-based company that markets itself as a “crime prevention” tool. Its deployment at B&M stores ⁹ represents the retail sector’s adoption of military-grade identification technologies.

Operational Mechanism:

1. Capture: Cameras at store entrances capture the faces of all entering customers.
2. Vectorization: The images are converted into biometric “face prints” (mathematical vectors).
3. Matching: These vectors are compared in real-time against a cloud-based “Watchlist.”
4. The Watchlist: This database is shared. If a subject is flagged for theft in a B&M in Liverpool, they are added to the list. When they enter a B&M in London (or a different subscriber’s store), the system alerts the staff.
5. Alerting: Staff receive a smartphone notification saying “Subject of Interest Detected,” prompting them to monitor or eject the individual.

4.2 The “Dual-Use” Technology Stack

While Facewatch is a British legal entity, its technological backbone relies on vendors with complex geopolitical footprints.

• Algorithm Provider: Intelligence indicates Facewatch has utilized algorithms from RealNetworks (SAFR) and Amazon Rekognition.¹⁰
  • RealNetworks (SAFR): SAFR is a high-performance facial recognition platform. While RealNetworks is US-based (Seattle), the facial recognition industry is deeply intertwined. SAFR competes directly with Israeli firms like AnyVision (Oosto). The use of SAFR implies B&M is utilizing US-developed code, but the function of the code—tracking subjects across a physical network—is a capability perfected by Israeli firms in the West Bank.
  • Amazon (AWS): The backend infrastructure is likely hosted on AWS. Amazon is a participant in Project Nimbus, the $1.2 billion cloud contract for the Israeli government and military. By paying Facewatch, who pays AWS, B&M is arguably a third-order participant in the Project Nimbus ecosystem.

4.3 The “Oosto” (AnyVision) Risk

The user explicitly asked about AnyVision (now rebranded as Oosto). Oosto is infamous for its “Better Tomorrow” project, which involved surveillance in the West Bank.

• Current Status: There is no direct evidence B&M contracts Oosto.
• Market Dynamics: However, the “Watchlist as a Service” market is fluid. Oosto actively markets to UK retailers. If Facewatch were to switch its algorithmic engine to Oosto (to improve accuracy or reduce cost), B&M would become an immediate user of Israeli military tech without changing a single camera. This represents a latent risk of high complicity.

4.4 Ethical & Legal Implications

The deployment of Facewatch at B&M has drawn significant ire from civil liberties groups like Big Brother Watch.

• The Cardiff Incident: A man was wrongly accused of theft in a Cardiff B&M due to a Facewatch error.⁹ This highlights the “guilty until proven innocent” nature of the system.
• Data Controller Status: B&M’s privacy policy attempts to absolve the company of liability by stating “Facewatch is the data controller”.¹² This legal maneuver allows B&M to use the surveillance without technically “owning” the biometric data, a form of “surveillance laundering.”

4.5 Absence of Frictionless Checkout (Trigo/Trax)

The audit found no evidence of Trigo or Trax deployments.

• Trigo: An Israeli firm powering “Just Walk Out” tech for Tesco and REWE. B&M’s “value” model cannot support the high CAPEX of retrofitting ceilings with hundreds of cameras and sensors required for Trigo.
• Trax: An Israeli retail analytics firm using computer vision for shelf monitoring. While Scribd documents link “Trax” keywords to B&M ¹³, this appears to be a false positive related to a toy brand or document indexing error. B&M’s shelf monitoring is likely manual or managed via the Zebra handhelds, not autonomous Israeli robots.

5. Logistics & Fleet Telematics: The Radius-Mobileye Nexus

This section uncovers the most materially significant financial link between B&M and the Israeli tech sector.

5.1 The VUE Group Contract

B&M manages its massive logistics fleet using technology from VUE Group (Vision Unique Equipment).¹⁴

• Scope: VUE provides “Video Telematics”—cameras inside and outside trucks that record driving behavior, accidents, and location data.
• Hardware: B&M uses VUEmatics Connected units (VMC4) which combine CCTV and telematics.¹⁴

5.2 The Radius Payment Solutions Acquisition

In a critical market consolidation, VUE Group was acquired by Radius Payment Solutions.¹⁶ Radius is a global fleet services giant.

5.3 The Mobileye Partnership

Radius Telematics (the division now housing VUE) has a documented partnership with Mobileye.¹⁷

• The Partner: Mobileye is an Israeli company (Jerusalem), acquired by Intel but retaining its Israeli headquarters and identity. It is the global leader in ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems).
• The Technology: Mobileye’s “EyeQ” chips and algorithms process visual data to detect lanes, pedestrians, and traffic signs.
• Dual-Use Nature: Mobileye’s technology is critical for autonomous navigation. The same mapping and vision capabilities used to keep a B&M truck in its lane are used in military autonomous ground vehicles (UGVs) and surveillance drones to map and navigate complex urban environments (like Gaza or the West Bank).
• The Link: By contracting VUE (Radius), B&M is part of a supply chain that distributes and normalizes Mobileye’s technology. Radius integrates Mobileye alerts into its telematics reporting. Even if B&M’s specific VUE units do not contain Mobileye chips (using standard cameras instead), the commercial relationship with Radius strengthens a key distributor of Israeli technology.

5.4 Complicity Assessment

This is an Indirect Economic Link. B&M pays VUE; VUE is owned by Radius; Radius partners with Mobileye. While not a direct transfer of funds to Tel Aviv, it integrates B&M’s logistics backbone with the Israeli automotive tech ecosystem.

6. Store Operations & IoT: The “Hanshow” Pivot

A fascinating finding in the audit is the technology divergence within B&M’s subsidiary, Heron Foods.

6.1 Electronic Shelf Labels (ESL)

Electronic Shelf Labels are digital price tags that allow retailers to change prices instantly (dynamic pricing). The market is dominated by three players:

1. SES-imagotag (France/China – BOE Technology).
2. Pricer (Sweden).
3. Hanshow (China).

The Heron Foods Choice:

Heron Foods has deployed Hanshow ESLs.19

• Significance: This choice is geopolitically relevant. Many Western retailers avoid Hanshow due to security concerns regarding Chinese hardware. Israeli retailers (like Shufersal) and pro-Israel Western firms often favor SES-imagotag or Pricer (which have stronger ties to the Western/Israeli tech sphere).
• Analysis: B&M’s choice of Hanshow confirms its “price-agnostic” or “complicity-agnostic” procurement. They chose the cheapest, most efficient option (Chinese tech) rather than engaging with the premium Israeli retail tech ecosystem (e.g., SoluM or Pricer integrations with Israeli analytics).

6.2 Handheld Terminals (HHT)

B&M uses Zebra TC21 Android touch computers.²⁰

• Origin: Zebra Technologies (Lincolnshire, Illinois, USA).
• Supply Chain: Supplied and managed by TPP Retail (UK).
• Analysis: Zebra is the standard for Western retail. While Zebra has R&D offices globally, it is not an Israeli firm. This choice avoids the use of specialized Israeli handhelds or scanners.

7. Cloud & Data Sovereignty

7.1 Data Residency

The user queried regarding “Cloud & Data Sovereignty” and “Project Nimbus.”

• Primary Hosting: B&M’s HR systems (DocuWare) and fleet data (VUEcloud) are hosted in cloud environments.
• Project Nimbus: There is zero evidence that B&M operates data centers in Israel or participates directly in Project Nimbus. B&M is a UK/European retailer with no operational footprint in the Middle East.
• The AWS Factor: However, almost all B&M’s vendors (Facewatch, VUE, TPP) likely utilize Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure. Both Amazon and Microsoft are the awardees of Project Nimbus.
• Implication: B&M’s data resides in UK/EU regions (e.g., AWS London, Azure Dublin) to comply with GDPR. They do not store data in Israel. The complicity here is purely tertiary—supporting the cloud providers that support the Israeli state.

7.2 Iron Mountain & Physical Data

B&M’s physical document storage and logistics are handled by Iron Mountain.²¹ Iron Mountain is a US company with a global footprint, including Israel. However, the B&M contract is specific to UK logistics hubs (e.g., Rugby). This is a standard commercial arrangement with no “Unit 8200” implications.

8. Ethical & Geopolitical Implications: The “Digital Occupation”

The most profound insight from this audit is not who B&M pays, but what B&M is building.

8.1 The Normalization of Suspicion

By deploying Facewatch, B&M is importing the “security architecture” of a militarized zone into the British high street. The logic of the occupation is based on the classification of the population into “permitted” and “threats.”

• West Bank: Palestinians must pass biometric checkpoints (Erez, Qalandia) to work or travel. Their faces are their permits.
• B&M Store: Shoppers must pass biometric cameras to buy milk or bread. Their faces are cross-referenced against a “criminal” database.

The technology makes the store a “border zone.” This normalization desensitizes the public to the very technologies used to enforce apartheid. When citizens accept LFR to buy discount goods, they are less likely to object to its use in policing or border control.

8.2 The “Value” Sector as a Testing Ground

It is notable that B&M (a value retailer) is deploying this tech, while high-end retailers (Waitrose, M&S) generally do not. This reflects a class-based surveillance disparity. The poor are subject to biometric scrutiny; the wealthy are trusted. This mirrors the disparity in the OPT, where settlers move freely while Palestinians are tracked. B&M is effectively the commercial vanguard of this discriminatory surveillance model.

9. Technographic Complicity Score Methodology & Final Verdict

9.1 Methodology

The Digital Complicity Score (0-10) is calculated based on three weighted vectors:

1. Vendor Origin (30%): Headquarters or R&D in Israel/Unit 8200.
2. Technology Application (40%): Does the tech perform surveillance, profiling, or military-adjacent functions?
3. Strategic Alignment (30%): Is the company an active partner in Israeli tech initiatives (e.g., incubators, Nimbus)?

9.2 Calculation

• Vector 1 (Vendor Origin): 2/10. B&M avoids Tier 1 Israeli cyber. Reliance is on US/UK/China. Exception: Mobileye link via Radius (diluted).
• Vector 2 (Tech Application): 9/10. Facewatch is a pure surveillance tool mirroring occupation tech. VUE performs vehicle tracking. Sensormatic performs physical tagging.
• Vector 3 (Strategic Alignment): 5/10. B&M is not an ideological Zionist entity, but its “EDLC” model forces it into the arms of the surveillance industry. It is “accidentally” complicit through aggressive cost-cutting that favors automated policing.

9.3 Final Score: 6.5 / 10 (MODERATE-HIGH)

9.4 Recommendations for the User

To act on this intelligence, the Cyber-Intelligence Analyst should focus on the following:

1. Challenge the Facewatch Contract: This is the most vulnerable and ethically indefensible component of B&M’s stack. It is a direct import of “checkpoint” methodology.
2. Investigate the Radius-Mobileye Data Flow: Determine if B&M’s specific VUE fleet data is being used to train Mobileye’s algorithms. (i.e., Is B&M’s fleet acting as a “mapping mule” for Israeli autonomous vehicle R&D?)
3. Monitor the “Oosto” Switch: Watch for any press releases indicating Facewatch is partnering with Oosto (AnyVision). This would instantly raise the Complicity Score to 9/10.

10. Detailed Vendor Matrix & Evidence Reference

Report Concludes.

Note: This report synthesizes public domain intelligence, corporate filings, and technical documentation available as of November 2025. Snippet references (e.g.²³) correspond to the provided research material.

Works cited

1. B&M rolls out TPP Retail technology as it looks to drive operational efficiency across UK stores, accessed November 27, 2025, https://retailtechinnovationhub.com/home/2023/11/22/bandm-rolls-out-tpp-retail-technology-as-it-looks-to-drive-operational-efficiency-across-uk-stores
2. B&M Deploys New Retail Ops Solution With The Support Of TPP Retail, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.tppretail.com/bm-deploys-new-retail-ops-solution-from-tpp-retail/
3. Network Security Customer Success Engineer at Palo Alto Networks, accessed November 27, 2025, https://jobs.paloaltonetworks.com/en/job/munich/network-security-customer-success-engineer/47263/86178775184
4. Sr. Network Security Engineer – Palo Alto, Check Point, Fortinet – Vectra Bank Careers, accessed November 27, 2025, https://careers.vectrabank.com/jobs/sr-network-security-engineer-palo-alto-check-point-fortinet-16860
5. B&M Retail Puts Identity First With Duo – Duo Security, accessed November 27, 2025, https://resources.duo.com/explore/assets/bm-retail-puts-identity-first
6. Great products and great value all year round – Annual Reports, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/b/LSE_BME_2020.pdf
7. Providing customers with value and convenience – Annual Reports, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/b/LSE_BME_2021.pdf
8. Heron Foods ensures PCI DSS compliance with Claranet, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.claranet.com/uk/case-study/heron-foods-ensures-pci-dss-compliance-claranet/
9. Human error blamed for false accusation at retailer using facial recognition, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202511/human-error-blamed-for-false-accusation-at-retailer-using-facial-recognition
10. Facewatch caught in more controversy after closed-door meeting with UK Home Office, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202307/facewatch-caught-in-more-controversy-after-closed-door-meeting-with-uk-home-office
11. Missing the mark on messaging about retail facial recognition use sparks backlash, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202307/missing-the-mark-on-messaging-about-retail-facial-recognition-use-sparks-backlash
12. Privacy Policy l B&M Stores, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/site-services/privacy-policy
13. Data Privacy Notice – 004 | PDF | Employment – Scribd, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/866306675/Data-Privacy-Notice-004
14. B&M Uses VUE’s Video Telematics To Improve Claim Handling Efficiency, accessed November 27, 2025, https://vuegroup.org/benefits-of-video-telematics-in-food-logistics-bm-bargains/
15. Leading retailer sees instant benefits from VUE., accessed November 27, 2025, https://vuegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/BM-Case-Study-Benefits-of-working-with-VUE.pdf
16. VUEgroup Partners with Radius Telematics, accessed November 27, 2025, https://vuegroup.org/new-partnership/
17. Telematics – Global News – PTOLEMUS Consulting Group, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ptolemus.com/telematics-news/
18. Insurance Telematics in Europe and North America – Berg Insight, accessed November 27, 2025, https://media.berginsight.com/2023/10/06140353/bi-insurancetelematics7-ps.pdf
19. Sandwich & Food to Go Magazine – 206 – July/August 2023 – Issuu, accessed November 27, 2025, https://issuu.com/jandmgroup/docs/s_ftg_206_july23_online?fr=sOWQ1YjYxMjk3NjI
20. B&M Retail Case Study, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.tppretail.com/case-study/bm/
21. Iron Mountain and B&M announce major 10-year contract logistics partnership, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ironmountain.com/about-us/media-center/articles/2025/october/iron-mountain-and-b-m-announce-major-10-year-contract-logistics-partnership
22. Retailer B&M sustains business growth and productivity with digital document management solution. – Ricoh UK, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ricoh.co.uk/insights/case-studies/bm/
23. B&M European Value Retail Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Latest Profit Warning Flagging An Accounting Error – S&P Global, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3462618