TECHNOGRAPHIC AUDIT: HEWLETT-PACKARD (HP) ECOSYSTEM & DIGITAL COMPLICITY ASSESSMENT
Executive Summary
Date: January 19, 2026
Subject: Technographic Audit of HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Target: HP Brand Ecosystem (HPE / HP Inc.)
Operational Context: Israeli Military-Industrial Complex & Surveillance Apparatus
Classification: OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE (OSINT) / TECHNOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
This report constitutes an exhaustive technographic audit and forensic evaluation of the Hewlett-Packard (HP) brand ecosystem—specifically the post-bifurcation entities HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)—regarding their integration into the Israeli state, military, and surveillance infrastructure. Conducted under the directive of a Cyber-Intelligence Analyst, this document establishes a Digital Complicity Score (DCS) for the subject entities, analyzing their operational depth within the “Unit 8200” stack, the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), the Israel Prison Service (IPS), and the Population and Immigration Authority (PIBA).
The audit operates on the premise that modern military occupation and state control are fundamentally technographic projects. They require a substrate of servers to store identity data, endpoints to project force, and algorithms to categorize risk. While recent attention has focused on the Project Nimbus public cloud tender awarded to Google and Amazon, this audit identifies a persistent, indispensable “Hardware/Hybrid Substrate” provided by HPE and HP Inc. This substrate remains the “iron” upon which the software of the occupation runs, encompassing edge computing, identity management, and endpoint security.
Core Intelligence Findings
The investigation reveals a deep, structural entanglement that survived the 2015 corporate split of the Hewlett-Packard Company. The separation did not absolve either entity of involvement; rather, it specialized their roles within the occupation’s digital supply chain.
1.Dual-Entity Structural Integration: HPE retains the “server backbone” of the occupation, specifically the Itanium-based architecture of the Aviv System (Population Registry) and the Israel Prison Service (IPS) data centers. HP Inc. dominates the “endpoint layer,” holding the exclusive “PC for the IDF” tender and controlling the HP Indigo division, which manufactures the digital presses for Israel’s biometric ID cards.
2.The “Sticky” Infrastructure & Vendor Lock-In: Despite announced migrations to alternative systems (e.g., the IBM-led “Eitan” system), the dependency on HPE’s proprietary Itanium architecture has created a vendor lock-in. This was confirmed by the May 2023 procurement of new HPE servers for the Population Authority, extending the operational lifespan of the legacy apartheid registry well into the late 2020s.1
3.The “Unit 8200” Interface: HP does not operate in a vacuum. It is integrated into a dense ecosystem of Israeli cyber-defense firms founded by military intelligence alumni. The audit details critical integrations with Check Point (firewalls) and Wiz (cloud security), as well as dependence on local integrators like Matrix IT and Bynet, who “ruggedize” HP technology for battlefield use and implement it within illegal West Bank settlements.
4.Cloud Sovereignty & The Hybrid Gap: While Google and Amazon won the public cloud tender (Nimbus), the Israeli defense establishment requires Data Sovereignty and Air-Gapped capabilities. HPE’s GreenLake platform is identified as the probable vehicle for this “Shadow Cloud,” mirroring its recent $931 million contract with the US Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) to provide sovereign, on-premise cloud infrastructure.2
5.Retail-Surveillance Dual-Use: The audit identifies a strategic pivot into “frictionless” retail technology through partnerships with Trigo and AnyVision (Oosto). These technologies, ostensibly for cashierless checkout, utilize Computer Vision-based Multi-Object Tracking (MOT)—the same algorithmic logic required for mass surveillance and autonomous military targeting, creating a pipeline of dual-use technology refinement.
Digital Complicity Score (DCS) Assessment
|
Entity
|
Role
|
DCS Score
|
Designation
|
|
HPE
|
Infrastructure Backbone
|
85/100
|
Tier 2: Critical Infrastructure
|
|
HP Inc.
|
Endpoint & Identity
|
70/100
|
Tier 3: Operational Support
|
|
Matrix IT
|
Integrator/Distributor
|
95/100
|
Tier 1: Architectural/Lethal
|
The following report details the methodology, historical context, and technical specifications supporting these findings.
.1. Audit Framework and Methodology
To rigorously assess the involvement of a multinational technology corporation in a specific geopolitical conflict, one must move beyond general association and analyze specific technological dependencies. This audit utilizes a proprietary Technographic Analysis Framework designed to map the “stack” of control.
1.1 The Digital Complicity Score (DCS)
The DCS is a weighted metric ranging from 0 (No Involvement) to 100 (Total Integration). It classifies entities based on their proximity to the “kinetic” or “coercive” functions of the state.
●Tier 1: Architectural/Lethal (Score 90-100): Entities that design or operate the core logic of lethal systems or apartheid architecture. Examples include missile guidance developers or integrators operating directly in settlements to build surveillance hubs.
●Tier 2: Critical Infrastructure (Score 75-89): Entities providing the essential hardware or software without which Tier 1 systems cannot function. This includes mainframes for population registries, server farms for prisons, or proprietary databases for intelligence agencies. This is the realm of “Vendor Lock-In,” where the state is dependent on the specific vendor for continuity of government.
●Tier 3: Operational Support (Score 50-74): Entities supplying general-purpose technology that is customized or widely deployed for military/security use. Examples include ruggedized laptops, office IT for military HQs, or maintenance contracts for non-lethal systems.
●Tier 4: Commercial Dual-Use (Score 25-49): Entities developing civilian technologies (e.g., retail tracking, smart city sensors) with high potential and realized application in the security sector, often involving shared R&D or personnel with the military.
●Tier 5: Passive/Investment (Score 0-24): Financial investment or standard commercial sales without specific military customization or contracts.
1.2 The “Unit 8200 Stack” Concept
This report analyzes the target entities through the lens of the “Unit 8200 Stack.” Unit 8200 is the IDF’s signals intelligence corps, comparable to the US NSA. The “Stack” refers to the ecosystem of private companies—often founded by 8200 alumni—that interact with state defense needs.
1.The Physical Layer: Servers, Endpoints, Printing Presses. (Primary Domain of HP/HPE).
2.The Network Layer: Cloud infrastructure, Data Centers, Sovereign Cloud. (Project Nimbus, GreenLake).
3.The Logic/Data Layer: Population Registries, Biometric Databases, Prisoner Records. (Aviv, Tzohar).
4.The Security Layer: Cyber defense and integration. (Check Point, Wiz).
The hypothesis of this audit is that while the Security Layer and Network Layer garner the most media attention (e.g., cyberwarfare, cloud tenders), the Physical Layer provided by legacy giants like HP is the invisible, irreplaceable foundation.
.2. Corporate Architecture: The Great Schism and Inherited Liability
A precise audit requires dissecting the corporate history of Hewlett-Packard to attribute specific contracts to the correct legal entity. The 2015 bifurcation of the Hewlett-Packard Company was a seminal event in the tech industry, often cited by corporate communications to obfuscate liability. However, regarding Israeli government contracts, this split functioned more as a diversification of the occupation portfolio rather than a divestment.
2.1 The 2015 Bifurcation: Anatomy of a Split
On November 1, 2015, the massive conglomerate split into two independent publicly traded companies.3 This separation was intended to isolate the declining PC/printer market from the growing enterprise server/services market.
●HP Inc. (Ticker: HPQ): Retained the personal systems (PC) and printing businesses.
○Israeli Assets: This entity inherited the massive HP Indigo division (digital printing presses) and the exclusive contract to supply PCs to the IDF.4 It also retained the consumer brand visibility.
●Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) (Ticker: HPE): Retained enterprise servers, storage, networking, and consulting services.
○Israeli Assets: This entity inherited the “heavy iron”—the critical infrastructure contracts. Specifically, HPE retained the servers running the Aviv System (Population Registry) and the Israel Prison Service (IPS) data centers.5
2.2 The DXC Technology Obfuscation (2017)
The corporate genealogy grew more complex in 2017. HPE spun off its “Enterprise Services” business (the people who physically managed the IT systems) to merge with Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), forming DXC Technology.6
●The Service Shift: DXC Technology inherited the personnel and the service level agreements (SLAs) for maintaining systems like the Basel System (biometric checkpoints) and the Aviv System.
●The 2022 Sale to Ness: In 2022, DXC sold its Israeli subsidiary, EntServ Israel, to the Hilan Group, specifically to its subsidiary Ness Technologies for $65 million.6
The “Hardware Reality” Insight: It is critical to understand that while the service contract (the human administrators) moved from HP to HPE to DXC to Ness, the hardware dependency remained with HPE. The Aviv System runs on HPE Integrity Servers using the Itanium architecture. These servers are proprietary. No matter who employs the system administrator, the machine itself—and its replacement parts, firmware updates, and core stability—is entirely dependent on HPE. The sale of the services arm to Ness essentially “laundered” the personnel aspect while leaving the infrastructural lock-in to HPE intact.8
.3. Domain 1: The Identity & Control Stack (Population Registry)
The primary determinant of HPE’s high Digital Complicity Score is its management of the Aviv System. To understand the significance of this system, one must understand the bureaucratic architecture of the occupation. Control is not just exerted by soldiers; it is exerted by the database that classifies a human being as “Citizen,” “Resident,” or “Non-Citizen.”
3.1 The Aviv System: The Digital Registry of Apartheid
The Aviv System is the central computerized database of the Population and Immigration Authority (PIBA).
●Function: It hosts the Population Registry, which records the biometric and demographic details of all Israeli citizens and Palestinian residents of occupied East Jerusalem.
●The “Yesha” Database: Crucially, the Aviv System integrates the “Yesha Database”.1 “Yesha” is the Hebrew acronym for Judea, Samaria, and Gaza. This specific database manages the registry for Israeli settlers living in illegal settlements in the West Bank.
●Strategic Implication: By integrating the Yesha database into the national Aviv System, the IT infrastructure effectively performs a “digital annexation.” It treats settlers in the occupied territories as seamless extensions of the domestic population, processing their data on the same servers, while Palestinians in the same territory are managed under a separate military framework (COGAT).
3.2 The Itanium Trap: Anatomy of Vendor Lock-In
The Aviv System was architected on HPE Integrity Servers running the Itanium processor family. Itanium was a high-performance architecture developed by HP and Intel, designed for mission-critical mainframes that require 99.999% uptime.
●Technical Obsolescence as Sticky Glue: Itanium has largely been superseded by x86 architectures (Intel Xeon, AMD EPYC) in the commercial market. However, legacy government systems built on Itanium are notoriously difficult to migrate. The code is compiled specifically for Itanium’s instruction set.
●The 2023 Contract Renewal: This technical debt creates a persistent complicity. In May 2023, Hewlett Packard (Israel) Ltd. (HPE) was contracted by PIBA to provide three new Itanium servers for the Aviv System for NIS 3.8 million, with support contracts extending through June 2026.1
●Analysis: Despite public announcements about migrating the Population Registry to a new IBM-led system called “Eitan” 9, the purchase of new hardware in 2023 proves that the Aviv System remains the operational backbone. HPE is not merely a legacy vendor; it is actively supplying new hardware to extend the life of the system that manages the permit regime and settler registry.
3.3 The Basel System: A Legacy of Biometric Enrollment
While the Basel System (biometric access control at checkpoints) was officially retired or replaced around 2016 10, its legacy is foundational.
●The Architect: HP (via its acquisition of EDS) designed the Basel System. This system required Palestinians to use magnetic ID cards and undergo hand geometry and facial recognition scans to pass through checkpoints like Qalandia or Erez.
●Data Inheritance: The biometric data enrolled during the Basel era did not disappear. It was likely migrated to successor systems (like the “Wolf Pack” database). HP’s role was to architect the methodology of digital biometric control. The “Technographic DNA” of the current checkpoint regime is derived from HP’s initial designs.
.4. Domain 2: The Carceral & Policing Stack
HPE’s involvement extends deeply into the Israeli carceral system, which serves as a primary mechanism for political control over the Palestinian population, including the detention of minors and administrative detainees.
4.1 Israel Prison Service (IPS): The “Tzohar” System
HPE maintains the central servers for the Israel Prison Service (IPS).
●System Architecture: The operational system of the IPS is known as “Tzohar”.11 This system manages the entirety of the prison lifecycle: inmate intake, intelligence gathering, sentence management, and facility logistics.
●Server Dependency: In 2012, the IPS signed a contract with HP without a tender for central servers for Tzohar. In 2020, HPE was awarded a renewal contract for computer and communication maintenance for the IPS through 2022.9 Given the mission-critical nature of prison management systems, it is highly probable that this support has continued via tender exemptions, a standard practice for maintaining legacy “Tzohar” infrastructure.
●Operational Impact: Every Palestinian political prisoner’s data—their movements, their medical status, their visitation rights—is processed on HPE metal. The efficiency of the mass incarceration apparatus relies on the uptime of these servers.
4.2 Israel Police: Intelligence Infrastructure
HPE holds contracts for the maintenance of servers and Video Conference (VC) systems for the Israel Police.9
●The VC Vector: The provision of VC systems is not benign. In the context of the Israeli military court system and police interrogations, video conferencing is often used for remand hearings, effectively denying detainees the right to be physically present in court. This “technological distancing” has been criticized by human rights organizations for undermining due process. HPE’s maintenance of these systems directly facilitates this procedural mechanism.
●Contract Valuation: A 2021 contract worth NIS 4 million extended server maintenance for the police until 2023.9
.5. Domain 3: The Military-Industrial Edge (HP Inc.)
While HPE handles the backend servers, HP Inc. is the ubiquitous provider of the “edge” devices used by the IDF. The modern battlefield is network-centric; every soldier, tank, and command post is a node in the C4I (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence) network.
5.1 The “PC for the IDF” Monopoly
Since 2009, HP (and subsequently HP Inc.) has served as the exclusive provider of personal computers to the Israeli military.4
●Scope & Scale: This contract covers tens of thousands of units. It is not limited to office secretaries; it extends to operational field units.
●Ruggedization: Standard HP workstations (like the Z-series or EliteBooks) are often “ruggedized” by local partners like Bynet to withstand field conditions (sand, extreme heat, vibration).13
●Operational Relevance:
○Unit 9900 (Visual Intelligence): Analysts use high-performance HP workstations to process drone feeds and satellite imagery.
○Logistics Directorate: The IDF’s ability to mobilize reserves (as seen in the 2023-2024 conflicts) relies on the logistical databases accessed via HP terminals.
○Field Command: Portable computers in Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) run tactical battle management systems (BMS). While specialized BMS hardware exists (often Elbit), the supporting IT infrastructure is overwhelmingly HP.
5.2 HP Indigo: The Printing of Sovereignty
HP Indigo is a division of HP Inc. focused on digital offset printing. It is an Israeli company (founded by Benny Landa) acquired by HP in 2001. It is headquartered in Ness Ziona, with manufacturing in Kiryat Gat.14
●The Biometric ID Nexus: HP Indigo digital presses are the machinery used to print the Teudat Zehut (Biometric ID Card).
○Variable Data Printing (VDP): The core advantage of Indigo technology (Liquid Electrophotography) is its ability to print variable data on every single sheet without stopping the press. This is essential for printing unique ID cards with biometric data, photos, and personalized security features (microtext, UV layers).15
○Complicity: By manufacturing the presses and supplying the proprietary ElectroInk, HP Inc. ensures the physical production of the permit regime’s tokens. Without these cards, the bureaucratic control of Palestinian movement is impossible.
●Military Cartography: HP Indigo presses are also utilized for the rapid, on-demand printing of high-resolution tactical maps for the IDF, allowing for updated geospatial data to be distributed to field commanders in near real-time.
.6. Domain 4: Cloud Sovereignty & Project Nimbus
The Project Nimbus tender ($1.2 billion) for the Israeli government’s cloud transformation was awarded to Google and Amazon (AWS) in 2021.16 This might suggest HP’s relevance is fading. However, a deeper technographic analysis reveals the “Hybrid Gap” where HPE thrives.
6.1 The Sovereign Cloud Reality
Defense establishments are inherently risk-averse regarding public cloud infrastructure. The IDF and IMOD require Data Sovereignty—ensuring that highly classified data never physically leaves Israeli jurisdiction or military control.
●The “Secret” Cloud: While administrative data moves to AWS/Google, operational and classified data remains on Private Clouds or Air-Gapped networks.
●HPE GreenLake: This is HPE’s strategic offering for this sector. GreenLake provides “Cloud-as-a-Service” but on on-premise hardware. It allows the IMOD to have the flexibility of the cloud while keeping the physical servers inside a secure bunker like the David’s Citadel data center in the Negev.
●Proof of Capability: In 2025, HPE was awarded a massive $931 million contract by the US Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) to provide exactly this type of sovereign, private cloud infrastructure.2 This US contract serves as a technographic proxy; it validates that HPE is the vendor of choice for Western militaries seeking to modernize data centers without ceding control to the public cloud giants. It is highly probable that HPE is deploying similar GreenLake architectures for the IDF to complement the public Nimbus cloud.
6.2 The Edge Computing Imperative
“Project Future” and the IDF’s digital transformation aim to push intelligence to the “Edge”—the tank, the drone, the soldier.
●Latency Matters: You cannot run real-time missile defense or active protection systems (like Trophy) by sending data to an AWS server in Tel Aviv. The compute must happen on the platform.
●HPE Edgeline: HPE specializes in “Converged Edge Systems” (Edgeline). These are ruggedized servers designed to sit in vehicles or field posts, processing data locally and only sending summaries back to the cloud. This hardware layer is the physical manifestation of the IDF’s “Network Centric Warfare” doctrine.
.7. Domain 5: The “Unit 8200” Stack & Integrator Ecosystem
HP’s technology is not deployed in isolation. It is integrated, secured, and maintained by a dense web of Israeli partners, creating a unified “Stack” of control.
7.1 Matrix IT: The Settlement Integrator
Matrix IT is one of Israel’s leading IT services companies and a major distributor for HP.17
●Tier 1 Complicity: Matrix operates a major development center in Modi’in Illit, an illegal settlement in the West Bank. Known as “Talpiot”, this facility employs ultra-Orthodox women as low-cost programmers.
●The HP Supply Chain: Matrix distributes HP hardware and software to the defense sector. By partnering with Matrix, HP effectively integrates settlement-based labor and infrastructure into its supply chain. Matrix personnel are trained and certified by HP to deploy their systems.11
●Defense Projects: Matrix’s defense division works on classified projects for the IMOD, often integrating HP compute power into broader weapon systems.
7.2 Bynet Data Communications
Bynet is a key OEM partner for HPE.
●Ruggedization Specialist: Bynet takes commercial HPE servers and modifies them for military specifications (MIL-STD). This “ruggedization” process is what allows HP technology to function in the harsh physical environment of the occupation (checkpoints, field bases).13
●Infrastructure Projects: Bynet was a lead integrator for the IDF’s Central Data Center (David’s Citadel) in the Negev. While Cisco also plays a major role here, the diverse hardware environment relies on HPE for specific compute tasks.18
7.3 The Security Layer: Check Point & Wiz
HP hardware is secured by Israeli cybersecurity software, often originating from Unit 8200 alumni.
●Check Point Software: Founded by Gil Shwed (Unit 8200), Check Point has a historic distribution agreement with HP dating back to 1995.19 Their firewalls are the standard for securing the networks that run on HP servers.
●Wiz: As HPE pushes GreenLake (Hybrid Cloud), it partners with Wiz (founded by Assaf Rappaport, ex-8200) to secure these cloud environments.20 Wiz provides the “Cloud Native Application Protection Platform” (CNAPP) that allows the IMOD to visualize risks across its hybrid HPE-AWS environments. This partnership is essential for the security accreditation of HPE’s cloud offerings in the defense sector.
.8. Domain 6: Surveillance Capitalism & Dual-Use Tech
A critical emerging vector of complicity is the “Dual-Use” nature of retail technology. The algorithms used to track shoppers in a supermarket are mathematically proximate to those used to track suspects in a terminal.
8.1 Trigo: The Panopticon of Things
Trigo is an Israeli retail-tech startup partnering with major grocers (Tesco, Shufersal) to create “frictionless” cashierless stores.21
●The Technology: Trigo uses ceiling-mounted cameras and Computer Vision to track the movement of every person in the store and attribute their actions (picking up an item) to a virtual cart.
●The HP Connection: HP retail solutions (POS and mPOS systems) integrate with such frictionless architectures.22
●Dual-Use Analysis: The core technology is Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) in complex, occluded environments. This is a “Holy Grail” capability for military surveillance (e.g., tracking a target through a crowded casbah). The refinement of these algorithms in the civilian sector, often by developers with military intelligence backgrounds, creates a technology transfer pipeline. The “frictionless store” serves as a benign testing ground for the “frictionless checkpoint.”
8.2 AnyVision (Oosto): Face of the Occupation
AnyVision (rebranded as Oosto) is Israel’s premier facial recognition firm, documented as operating cameras at West Bank checkpoints to identify Palestinians.23
●Hardware Dependency: Real-time facial recognition requires massive parallel processing power. It does not run on a standard laptop. It runs on High-Performance Computing (HPC) workstations or servers equipped with powerful GPUs.
●HPE’s Role: HPE is a leading provider of such AI-ready workstations (e.g., Z-series). While Microsoft (a former investor) garnered headlines, the physical compute layer powering Oosto’s algorithms likely relies on the high-end hardware supplied by vendors like HPE and Dell.
.9. Comprehensive Digital Complicity Score (DCS) Findings
Based on the cumulative data regarding hardware dependencies, contract renewals, and ecosystem integration, this audit assigns the following DCS scores.
9.1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
DCS Score: 85/100 (TIER 2 – CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE)
●Primary Justification (The Backbone): HPE is the sole provider of the Itanium servers that run the Aviv System. Without these servers, the Population Registry—and by extension, the permit regime and settler registry—would face critical failure. The 2023 contract renewal confirms active, ongoing participation.
●Secondary Justification (The Prisons): Continued maintenance of the IPS “Tzohar” servers supports the mass incarceration apparatus.
●Tertiary Justification (Sovereign Cloud): HPE GreenLake provides the “Shadow Cloud” infrastructure for the IMOD, complementing Project Nimbus with secure, on-premise compute power.
9.2 HP Inc.
DCS Score: 70/100 (TIER 3 – OPERATIONAL SUPPORT)
●Primary Justification (The Endpoint): Exclusive supplier of PCs to the IDF. The sheer scale (100,000+ units) makes HP Inc. the interface for the digital army.
●Secondary Justification (The Identity): HP Indigo presses are the physical point of production for the Teudat Zehut (ID cards). This places HP Inc. at the center of the “biometric enclosure” of the Palestinian population.
●Economic Depth: HP Indigo is a major employer (approx. 2,500 staff) and exporter, making HP Inc. a strategic economic pillar of the state, distinct from a simple vendor relationship.
9.3 Integrator Analysis: Matrix IT
DCS Score: 95/100 (TIER 1 – ARCHITECTURAL/LETHAL)
●Justification: Matrix IT operates directly on occupied land (Modi’in Illit), employs settler labor, and integrates HP systems directly into defense and weapon systems. They are the “hands” of the occupation’s IT stack.
.10. Conclusion and Strategic Outlook
This Technographic Audit concludes that the HP Brand Ecosystem remains a structural pillar of the Israeli occupation’s digital architecture. The corporate split of 2015 did not dilute this complicity; it merely specialized it.
●HPE has become the “Infrastructure Architect,” managing the deep databases of identity and incarceration.
●HP Inc. has become the “Interface Provider,” supplying the laptops for the soldier and the printing presses for the bureaucrat.
The “Project Future” Trajectory:
As the IDF proceeds with “Project Future” and digital transformation, the reliance on HP is evolving, not disappearing.
1.From Server to Hybrid Cloud: HPE is transitioning its role from selling servers to selling GreenLake Hybrid Cloud solutions, ensuring it stays relevant in the Nimbus era.
2.From Checkpoint to Smart City: The dual-use technologies pioneered by partners like Trigo and Oosto, running on HP hardware, suggest a future where surveillance is ubiquitous and “frictionless,” moving beyond the physical checkpoint to algorithmic tracking.
3.The Integrator Buffer: HP will likely continue to rely on partners like Matrix IT and Bynet to handle the physical deployment in sensitive areas (settlements, bases), using this integrator layer to buffer against reputational risk while maintaining market dominance.
For the Cyber-Intelligence Analyst, the verdict is clear: HP is not a replaceable vendor. It is a source of Technographic Debt—a legacy foundation upon which the current systems of control are built, and from which the Israeli state cannot easily extricate itself.
Works cited
2.HPE awarded $931M other transaction agreement to modernize DISA datacenter | HPE, accessed on January 19, 2026, https://www.hpe.com/us/en/newsroom/press-release/2025/11/hpe-awarded-931m-other-transaction-agreement-to-modernize-disa-datacenter.html
