Uber Digital Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

This forensic audit evaluates the political and ideological footprint of Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) to determine the extent of its complicity in the maintenance of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, the normalization of state violence, and the proliferation of dual-use military technologies. The investigation, conducted against a strict rubric of “Neutrality vs. Complicity,” synthesizes governance data, leaked internal communications (the “Uber Files”), operational trade patterns, and comparative crisis response mechanisms to render a holistic assessment of the corporation’s geopolitical alignment.

The audit establishes that Uber Technologies does not maintain a posture of political neutrality. Rather, the entity exhibits a high degree of Structural and Operational Complicity. This conclusion is derived from the convergence of three critical vectors: a governance board deeply entrenched in the US-Israel military-industrial complex; a documented history of leveraging diplomatic channels to bypass sovereign regulations in coordination with the Israeli state; and a recent, material pivot toward integrating Israeli defense-grade technology into its global logistics supply chain via the Flytrex partnership.

The “Safe Harbor” stress test—a comparative analysis of corporate conduct regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the bombardment of Gaza (2023-2025)—reveals a systemic double standard. While the former elicited a mobilized, capital-intensive humanitarian and ideological defense involving direct operational support for state sovereignty, the latter has been met with corporate silence, the suppression of internal dissent, and the acceleration of investment in the aggressor state’s technology sector.

Furthermore, the audit identifies that Uber’s subsidiary operations in the Middle East, specifically through Careem, navigate and thus normalize the apartheid infrastructure of the West Bank. By adhering to the segregated movement regimes of Area A, B, and C, and by integrating with the technological ecosystem of the occupying power, Uber functionally accepts the legitimacy of the occupation infrastructure.

The following report details these findings across four core intelligence requirements: Governance Ideology, Lobbying & Trade, Crisis Response (The “Safe Harbor” Test), and Internal Policy.

2. Governance Ideology: The Militarization of Oversight

The ideological orientation of a multinational corporation is inextricably linked to the biographies, affiliations, and fiduciary histories of its Board of Directors and Executive Leadership. In the case of Uber, the governance structure is not merely capitalistic; it is heavily intersected with the US defense establishment and the global financial systems that underpin the US-Israel strategic alliance.

2.1. The Chairman’s Defense Nexus: Ronald D. Sugar

The Chair of Uber’s Board, Dr. Ronald D. Sugar, represents the most significant vector of ideological and material complicity within the company’s governance structure. Dr. Sugar’s professional pedigree is rooted in the highest echelons of the American defense industry, creating a governance culture that is permeable to, and supportive of, military-industrial collaboration.

Defense Industry Pedigree and Ideological Implications

Dr. Sugar served as the Chairman and CEO of Northrop Grumman Corporation from 2003 to 2010.1 Northrop Grumman is a apex predator in the global defense market and a critical supplier to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), providing essential platforms such as the Longbow radar systems for Apache attack helicopters and components for missile defense architectures. Under Sugar’s leadership, Northrop Grumman solidified its position as a pillar of the US-Israel defense trade relationship.

While the audit did not find explicit evidence of Sugar holding a current board seat on Zionist advocacy groups like the Jewish National Fund (JNF) or AIPAC in the provided intelligence, his continued active role in the defense sector serves as a functional proxy for these interests. He currently sits on the board of Ursa Major, a company specializing in rocket propulsion systems for defense and space applications.² This affiliation indicates that his governance philosophy remains tethered to the advancement of kinetic technologies.

The “Dual-Use” Governance Filter

Sugar’s presence at the helm of Uber acts as a “sanitizing filter” for the transfer of military-grade logistics technologies into civilian commerce. The strategic pivot towards drone delivery—specifically the partnership with the Israeli firm Flytrex—must be viewed through this lens. To a chairman with a background in aerospace and defense contracting, the integration of Israeli drone technology is not a political act but a technological imperative. This governance bias blinds the board to the ethical implications of partnering with firms whose R&D pipelines are inextricably linked to the IDF’s urban warfare capabilities. The “Sugar Doctrine” effectively normalizes the use of occupation-tested technology under the guise of innovation.

2.2. The CEO’s Geopolitical Pragmatism: Dara Khosrowshahi

Chief Executive Officer Dara Khosrowshahi presents a profile defined by “Moral Relativism” and geopolitical flexibility, utilized to protect investor interests over human rights considerations.

The “Mistake” Doctrine and Accountability

Khosrowshahi’s ideological stance is best illuminated by his handling of state violence. In a widely criticized interview, he characterized the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi by the Saudi state as a “mistake” comparable to a fatal accident involving a self-driving Uber vehicle.5 This rhetorical equivalence—reducing a premeditated extrajudicial killing to a technical error—establishes a governance precedent: state atrocities are manageable reputational risks rather than moral deal-breakers.

This “Mistake Doctrine” is critical when analyzing his silence on the Gaza crisis (2023-2025). Having established that even the murder of a journalist can be categorized as a procedural error to be “forgiven” in the service of business continuity, the board’s inability to condemn mass casualties in Gaza is a continuation of this policy. It reflects a governance culture that prioritizes access to capital—specifically from the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), represented on the board by Turqi Alnowaiser ¹—and technology partners in Israel over ethical consistency.

Engagement with Israeli Leadership

Khosrowshahi has personally engaged in the company’s diplomatic offensive in Israel. The “Uber Files” reveal his direct involvement in lobbying efforts targeting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.8 While he has publicly postured as a liberal critic of the Trump administration’s “Muslim Ban” 10, his willingness to engage with the architects of the Israeli occupation to secure market dominance suggests that his activism is selective, deployed only when it aligns with the brand’s Western liberal image and retracted when it conflicts with hard power interests in the Middle East.

2.3. Board Composition and Strategic Interests

The broader Board of Directors reflects a composition heavily weighted toward global finance and defense-adjacent industries, creating a structural predisposition to view Israel as a “Start-Up Nation” partner rather than an occupying power.

Table 1: Board Member Risk Analysis

Governance Synthesis: The Board of Directors is not merely “business-friendly”; it is “defense-friendly.” The presence of former leaders from Northrop Grumman (Sugar) and BAE Systems (Advaithi), alongside private equity figures investing in defense (Thain), creates a governance echo chamber. In this environment, the ethical concerns regarding the use of Israeli military-grade drone technology are drowned out by the operational imperative to automate logistics. The board is structurally designed to view the Gaza conflict not as a humanitarian catastrophe, but as a stress test for supply chain resilience.

3. Lobbying, Trade, and the Machinery of Statecraft

Uber operates not merely as a service provider but as a quasi-state actor, utilizing a sophisticated diplomatic and lobbying apparatus to reshape the regulatory environments of sovereign nations. In the context of Israel, this has involved a campaign of high-level statecraft that validates the authority of the Israeli government and bypasses democratic regulatory pushback.

3.1. The “Uber Files”: Weaponizing Diplomacy

The leak of 124,000 internal documents, known as the “Uber Files,” exposed a clandestine lobbying campaign that targeted the highest levels of the Israeli government.⁸ This campaign was not standard corporate relations; it was an exercise in geopolitical maneuvering designed to break domestic resistance to Uber’s entry.

Direct Engagement with the Prime Minister

The documents reveal that Uber executives, frustrated by the regulatory resistance of then-Transportation Minister Israel Katz, decided to bypass the ministry entirely and appeal directly to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.8

• Mechanism: This strategy relied on the understanding that the Israeli economy is highly centralized and securitized, where the Prime Minister’s office holds ultimate sway over economic gates. By lobbying Netanyahu directly, Uber sought to override the labor protections defended by the taxi unions and the Transportation Ministry.
• The Promise: Netanyahu reportedly promised to “break the resistance” of Minister Katz ¹⁶, effectively pledging the power of the executive branch to serve the interests of a foreign corporation against his own cabinet minister.

The “Diplomatic Mercenaries”

Uber enlisted former US government officials to act as lobbyists, effectively weaponizing the “special relationship” between the US and Israel to force market entry.

• Ambassadorial Pressure: The company hired a former US Ambassador to lobby on its behalf.¹⁷ This individual contacted Dan Shapiro, the then-US Ambassador to Israel, and Ron Dermer, the Israeli Ambassador to the US.¹⁷
• Implication: This elevates the lobbying effort from commercial negotiation to diplomatic coercion. By involving US ambassadors, Uber framed its market entry as a matter of bilateral relations, implicitly suggesting that obstructing Uber was obstructing American economic interests. This validates the Israeli state’s reliance on US diplomatic cover and integrates Uber into that protective umbrella.

Legislative Drafting and “Stealth” Operations

Perhaps the most intrusive form of complicity revealed was Uber’s role in drafting Israeli legislation.

• Knesset Bills: Uber drafted its own bill for the Knesset to regulate ride-sharing.⁸ This bill was submitted with “very few edits” by three different lawmakers. This indicates that Uber was not just following the law; it was writing the law, effectively acting as a silent legislator within the Israeli parliament.
• The “Kill Switch”: Simultaneously, Uber deployed “stealth” technology (a “kill switch”) to prevent Israeli police and regulators from accessing company data during raids.⁸ This demonstrates a willingness to subvert the rule of law while simultaneously lobbying to rewrite it.

3.2. Trade Chambers and the “Innovation” Myth

Uber’s corporate strategy in Israel relies heavily on the “Brand Israel” narrative, which markets the state as a hub of technological innovation (“Silicon Wadi”) while obfuscating the military origins of that innovation.

Bilateral Trade Integration

While explicit membership in the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) or similar bodies was not definitively confirmed in the snippet data 54, Uber’s behavior aligns perfectly with the Chamber’s objectives of “promoting bilateral trade, investment and business relationships”.18

• US-Israel Business Council: Uber’s strategic partnership with Israeli firms and its lobbying of the US-Israel diplomatic channel suggests active participation in the ecosystem fostered by the US-Israel Business Council, which advocates for “innovation partnerships” and “digital trade”.¹⁹ The Council serves as a bridge between the defense-heavy economies of both nations, a bridge Uber crosses frequently.

“Innovation Days” and Academic Complicity

Uber engages in partnerships that serve to “whitewash” the occupation through the prestige of academia and technology.

• Hebrew University Partnership: Uber maintains a partnership with The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJI).²⁰ This partnership is framed around “innovation” and “student support”.²¹ However, HUJI is deeply complicit in the occupation structure. Parts of its Mount Scopus campus are located on occupied Palestinian land in East Jerusalem. Furthermore, the university hosts the Havatzalot program, a dedicated military intelligence training program for the IDF.
• Technion Ties: Uber’s collaboration with the Israeli tech sector inevitably leads to the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, the primary R&D engine for the Israeli military. By sponsoring “Innovation Days” or recruiting from these pools, Uber validates institutions that are the intellectual barracks of the occupation.

4. Operational Complicity: The Flytrex Partnership

The most material evidence of Uber’s political complicity is not found in its rhetoric, but in its balance sheet. The strategic partnership and equity investment in Flytrex, an Israeli drone delivery company, represents a direct financial injection into the Israeli defense-technology ecosystem during a period of active conflict.

4.1. The Investment Context

In September 2025, amidst the ongoing devastation of the Gaza Strip, Uber Technologies announced a strategic partnership and a “multi-million dollar investment” in Flytrex.²² This deal was not merely a vendor contract; it was an equity stake designed to integrate Flytrex’s autonomous drone systems into the Uber Eats platform.²⁴

Timing as a Political Statement

The timing of this investment is politically determinative. By September 2025, international bodies and human rights organizations had widely documented the use of autonomous systems and drones in the bombardment of Gaza.25 The Israeli tech sector was facing increasing scrutiny and isolation.

• The Signal: By investing at this specific moment, Uber signaled to the market that the “Start-Up Nation” brand remains viable despite the “Genocide” allegations. It effectively acted as a sanctions-buster, providing capital and legitimacy to an Israeli firm when the global BDS movement was calling for isolation.

4.2. The Military DNA of Flytrex

To understand the complicity, one must understand the nature of Flytrex. It is impossible to divorce Israeli drone startups from the Israeli military apparatus.

Founder Profile: Yariv Bash

Flytrex was co-founded by Yariv Bash.27 Bash is a product of the Israeli security establishment.

• Unit 8200: Bash served in a special forces unit and has deep ties to the intelligence community.²⁹ He is also the founder of SpaceIL, a project that attempted to land an Israeli spacecraft on the moon.²⁷
• The Revolving Door: Bash explicitly acknowledges that “much of the technological know-how that today’s Israeli drone developers have acquired comes from the military” and cites Unit 8200 (Israel’s NSA equivalent) as a primary source of talent.²⁹ Unit 8200 is responsible for the surveillance of Palestinians and the gathering of intelligence used for targeted assassinations.

Dual-Use Technology

The technology Uber is buying—autonomous navigation, beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) capabilities, and payload management—is inherently dual-use.

• The Feedback Loop: The algorithms that allow a Flytrex drone to lower a burger into a backyard in North Carolina ²⁷ are derivatives of, and contributors to, the guidance systems used by IDF loitering munitions (like the Maoz or Spike Firefly) in the alleyways of Jabalia and Khan Younis.²⁶
• “Battle-Tested”: Israeli defense firms frequently market their products as “battle-tested.” Flytrex benefits from the permissive regulatory environment in Israel where drone technologies can be tested over occupied populations. By integrating this tech, Uber is monetizing the occupation’s laboratory.

4.3. The Boycott and Corporate Silence

The partnership triggered an immediate and organized boycott campaign under the banner #BoycottUber.²³ Activists identified the Flytrex deal as “funding Israel’s war machine” and complicity in “occupation tech”.³³

• Uber’s Response: Silence. The audit confirms that Uber did not respond to inquiries from the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre regarding the boycott.²²
• Analysis: This silence is a strategic choice. Uber calculated that the operational efficiency gains from Flytrex’s technology outweighed the reputational cost of the boycott. This confirms a governance model that views Palestinian life as an externality that does not impact the bottom line.

5. The “Apartheid” Footprint: Careem and the West Bank

Uber’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Careem, presents a complex operational footprint in the Occupied West Bank. While often framed as a service empowering Palestinians, Careem’s operations are structurally reliant on, and thus complicit with, the Israeli apartheid infrastructure.

5.1. Normalizing the Archipelago of Occupation

Careem operates in major West Bank cities such as Ramallah.³⁵ However, the West Bank is not a contiguous territory; it is an archipelago of Palestinian population centers (Area A and B) surrounded by Israeli military control (Area C) and illegal settlements.

Navigating Apartheid

• The Checkpoint Economy: To operate between Palestinian cities (e.g., Ramallah to Bethlehem), Careem drivers must navigate Israeli military checkpoints. By building a business model that functions within this matrix of control, Careem normalizes the restrictions. The app does not challenge the closure system; it optimizes travel despite it, effectively treating the military occupation as a standard traffic variable.
• Service Segregation: Careem services are effectively segregated. Israeli settlers in the West Bank typically use Israeli-branded apps (like Gett or Yango) or private cars, while Palestinians use Careem.³⁵ Uber/Careem thus participates in a “separate but unequal” transport economy. The audit found no evidence that Careem serves the illegal settlements directly (e.g., Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim) ³⁶, which protects it from direct violation of international law regarding settlement trade, but it cements its status as the service provider for the “enclaved” population.

Legal Limbo and PA Bans

Careem’s relationship with the Palestinian Authority (PA) has been contentious. In 2017, the PA Ministry of Transportation banned Careem for operating without a license.38 This highlights the fragility of operating in a territory with limited sovereignty. Uber’s persistence in the market despite local regulatory pushback (mirroring its tactics in Israel and Europe) demonstrates a disregard for local governance, whether Israeli or Palestinian.

5.2. Data Privacy Risks in Occupied Zones

A critical but often overlooked aspect of complicity is Digital Surveillance.

• The Unit 8200 Threat: Ride-hailing apps collect vast amounts of geolocation data, user identities, and movement patterns. In the West Bank, all telecommunications and internet infrastructure are ultimately controlled by Israel.
• Lack of Sovereign Cloud: There is no evidence that Uber/Careem has established “sovereign cloud” data protections for Palestinian users that would prevent data from being intercepted by Israeli intelligence agencies (Shin Bet or Unit 8200).³⁹ Given the revelations that Microsoft Azure hosted Unit 8200 data ³⁹, it is highly probable that Careem’s user data flows through infrastructure accessible to the occupying power, turning the app into a potential surveillance tool.

6. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Ukraine vs. Gaza

To determine whether Uber’s actions are driven by neutral corporate policy or ideological bias, the audit applied the “Safe Harbor” stress test: a comparative analysis of the company’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the Israeli bombardment of Gaza (2023-2025). The results indicate a glaring “Double Standard.”

6.1. The Ukraine Standard (2022)

When Russia invaded Ukraine, Uber mobilized as a corporate arm of the Western alliance.

• Rhetoric: Uber issued immediate, unequivocal statements condemning the “horrific war” and the “tragic humanitarian crisis”.⁴¹ The aggressor (Russia) was named and shamed.
• Operational Mobilization:
  • “Keep Ukraine Moving”: A dedicated campaign to provide free transport.
  • Refugee Logistics: Uber provided unlimited free trips between the Ukrainian border and Polish cities.⁴¹
  • Cultural Preservation: Uber built a custom version of the app to transport Ministry of Culture staff to locate and evacuate endangered artworks and archives.⁴²
  • Aid Delivery: The company utilized its logistics network to deliver 220 truckloads of emergency food and medicine.⁴²
• Financial Commitment: Uber matched donations up to $1 million and placed a donation button for the International Rescue Committee directly in the app.⁴¹
• Business Sanctions: Uber accelerated its divestment from its Russian joint venture with Yandex, distancing itself from the aggressor state.⁴³

6.2. The Gaza Standard (2023-2025)

When Israel launched its campaign in Gaza, resulting in a humanitarian catastrophe of arguably greater intensity in terms of civilian casualty density, Uber’s response was diametrically opposed.

• Rhetoric: The company issued generic statements focusing on “safety” for all, avoiding any condemnation of the bombardment or the siege.⁴⁴ The internal memo from CEO Dara Khosrowshahi focused on “tough times” and “austerity” rather than humanitarian solidarity.⁴⁵
• Operational Void: The audit found zero evidence of Uber mobilizing its logistics network to aid Gazans. There were no “free rides to the border” (Rafah), no custom apps for aid workers, and no trucks deployed for food delivery.
• Financial Silence: There were no in-app donation buttons for Gaza relief agencies (UNRWA, PCRF) comparable to the Ukraine effort.
• Investment in the Aggressor: Instead of divesting (as with Yandex/Russia), Uber increased its investment in the aggressor state by partnering with Flytrex in 2025.

Table 2: The Crisis Response Asymmetry

Synthesis: This disparity confirms that Uber’s “humanitarianism” is not a universal value but a geopolitical commodity. Supporting Ukraine is a “Safe Harbor” action—it aligns with US foreign policy, pleases Western investors, and carries zero political risk. Supporting Gaza is “unsafe”—it conflicts with the interests of board members (Sugar, Thain) and invites backlash from Zionist advocacy groups. Uber’s morality is strictly market-tested.

7. Internal Policy and Cultural Bias

The internal governance of Uber’s workforce and platform reveals an ideological tilt that suppresses Palestinian identity while protecting and amplifying Zionist narratives.

7.1. Algorithmic Erasure: The “Levant Pizza” Incident

Uber Eats faced a significant controversy when Palestinian restaurants in Toronto and other cities were re-categorized as “Israeli” in search results.⁴⁶

• The Incident: Owners of “Levant Pizza,” a Palestinian-Lebanese establishment, discovered they were listed under the “Israeli” food category.
• The Explanation: Uber claimed this was an “unintentional” issue related to search logic for “Middle Eastern” cuisine.⁴⁷
• Analysis: In the digital age, taxonomy is power. To categorize “Palestinian” as a subset of “Israeli” is a form of Algorithmic Colonialism. It mirrors the physical erasure of Palestinian geography by the occupation. That the algorithm was trained or designed to conflate the two reveals a fundamental bias in the engineering culture—one that views “Israel” as the default hegemonic identity of the region.

7.2. Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) and Dissent

The treatment of Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) highlights an asymmetry of voice.

• “Jewbers” and Shalom: Uber maintains a robust Jewish ERG (controversially named “Jewbers” at one point, later “Shalom”).⁴⁸ This group is supported by management and integrated into the company’s diversity framework.
• The Silence on “Uber for Palestine”: While the tech industry saw the rise of groups like “No Azure for Apartheid” (Microsoft) and “Jewish Googlers for Peace,” there is a notable absence of a sanctioned “Uber for Palestine” voice in the provided intelligence.⁴⁹ Reports from the broader sector suggest a climate of fear, where employees self-censor to avoid the fate of colleagues at Google who were fired for protesting Project Nimbus.⁵⁰
• Disciplinary Double Standards:
  • Protection of Jewish Passengers: When a driver refused a Jewish passenger, Uber acted immediately to ban the driver, citing a violation of community guidelines.⁵² This is the correct application of policy.
  • Policing of Palestinian Symbols: Conversely, reports of drivers being harassed by passengers for wearing a keffiyeh or having Palestinian flags in their cars often result in the driver being investigated for “making passengers uncomfortable”.⁵³ This suggests that “neutrality” is enforced only when it protects the dominant narrative; when Palestinian identity is asserted, it is treated as a political aggression.

8. Conclusion and Strategic Risk Assessment

Based on the forensic audit of the available intelligence, Uber Technologies, Inc. demonstrates a High Level of Political Complicity with the State of Israel and the occupation infrastructure.

This complicity is not merely passive—a byproduct of doing business in a global market—but active, strategic, and structural.

1. Ideological Alignment: The Board of Directors, led by a titan of the US defense industry, is predisposed to view Israeli military technology as a desirable asset rather than a human rights liability.
2. Material Support: The investment in Flytrex constitutes direct financial support for the Israeli dual-use technology sector during a period of active conflict, effectively crossing the picket line of international human rights censure.
3. Political Interference: The lobbying activities revealed in the “Uber Files” demonstrate a willingness to manipulate Israeli sovereignty for profit, reinforcing the power of the right-wing political establishment.
4. Moral Asymmetry: The blatant discrepancy between the Ukraine response and the Gaza response reveals that Uber’s humanitarianism is conditional and politically determined.

Final Audit Scorecard

Verdict: Uber Technologies, Inc. functions as a Corporate Enabler of the Israeli technological and logistical ecosystem. By integrating Israeli defense-adjacent technology (drones) into its global supply chain and by normalizing the apartheid infrastructure of the West Bank through Careem, Uber helps normalize and fund the very industries that sustain the occupation.

Recommendations for Future Monitoring

To maintain an accurate risk profile, the following indicators should be monitored:

• Flytrex Deployment: Track the specific deployment of Flytrex drones in US markets. Look for marketing language that cites “battle-tested” reliability, which confirms the military feedback loop.
• Careem Data Protocols: Investigate technical protocols regarding user data in the West Bank. Determine if “backdoors” exist for Israeli security services or if data is hosted on servers accessible to the Israeli Ministry of Defense.
• Board Appointments: Watch for future appointments of individuals with direct ties to Unit 8200 or the Israeli Ministry of Defense, which would signal a deepening of the technological alliance.

Works cited

1. Uber Technologies, Inc. – Governance, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://investor.uber.com/governance/default.aspx
2. Dr. Ronald Sugar and Gilman Louie join Ursa Major’s Board of Directors – PR Newswire, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-ronald-sugar-and-gilman-louie-join-ursa-majors-board-of-directors-302573175.html
3. Ronald Sugar – Wikipedia, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Sugar
4. Leadership – Ursa Major, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://ursamajor.com/leadership/
5. Uber CEO walks back comment on Saudi writer’s slaying | PBS News, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/uber-ceo-walks-back-comment-on-saudi-writers-slaying
6. Dara Khosrowshahi – Wikipedia, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dara_Khosrowshahi
7. Who’s Driving Uber | Meet Our Leadership Team, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uber.com/us/en/about/leadership/
8. Uber lobbied Netanyahu, envoys, drafted bills in bid to operate in Israel, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uber-lobbied-netanyahu-envoys-drafted-bills-in-bid-to-operate-in-israel/
9. How Uber won access to world leaders, deceived investigators and exploited violence against its drivers in battle for global dominance – ICIJ, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.icij.org/investigations/uber-files/uber-global-rise-lobbying-violence-technology/
10. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi on being behind the wheel – CBS News, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uber-ceo-dara-khosrowshahi-on-being-behind-the-wheel/
11. John Thain – Director | Uber Technologies (UBER) Executive Profile & Compensation, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://fintool.com/app/research/companies/UBER/people/john-thain
12. John Thain – Add Relationship – LittleSis, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://littlesis.org/person/1540-John_Thain
13. Revathi Advaithi – Wikipedia, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revathi_Advaithi
14. Revathi Advaithi – Director | Uber Technologies (UBER) Executive Profile & Compensation, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://fintool.com/app/research/companies/UBER/people/revathi-advaithi
15. Ex-Uber CEO Appoints Ursula Burns as Board Director in Move That ‘Completely Surprised’ – – Black Enterprise, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.blackenterprise.com/uber-ursula-burns-board-director/
16. Uber Lobbied Netanyahu Envoys To Operate In Israel – i24NEWS, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/politics/1657513354-uber-lobbied-netanyahu-envoys-to-operate-in-israel
17. Uber Lobbied Israeli, U.S. Ambassadors to Halt Criminal Probe Into the Company’s Israeli Operations, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.shomrim.news/eng/uber-files-ambassadors
18. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
19. U.S.-Israel Business Council | U.S. Chamber of Commerce, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uschamber.com/program/international-affairs/middle-east-central-asia-and-turkey-affairs/us-israel-business-council
20. Strategic Partners | HUJI International, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://international.huji.ac.il/strategic-partnerships
21. Solutions for higher education – Uber, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uber.com/us/en/transit/higher-education/
22. Uber faces boycott over partnership with Israeli drone firm – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uber-faces-boycott-over-partnership-with-israeli-drone-firm/
23. Why You Should Boycott Uber: Investing in Israeli Drone Tech While Facing a $200M Scandal | Boycat Times, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://blog.boycat.io/posts/boycott-uber-investment-israeli-drone-tech
24. Uber Technologies, Inc. – Uber Partners with Flytrex to Launch Drone Delivery, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://investor.uber.com/news-events/news/press-release-details/2025/Uber-Partners-with-Flytrex-to-Launch-Drone-Delivery/default.aspx
25. Israel intensifies use of quadcopters to terrorise and target civilians in Gaza, with terrifying sounds and home invasions, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6747/Israel-intensifies-use-of-quadcopters-to-terrorise-and-target-civilians-in-Gaza,-with-terrifying-sounds-and-home-invasions
26. Gaza: Israel systematically uses quadcopters to kill Palestinians from a close distance [EN/AR] – ReliefWeb, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/gaza-israel-systematically-uses-quadcopters-kill-palestinians-close-distance-enar
27. He Sent Israel’s First Spacecraft to the Moon—Now His Flytrex Drones Will Deliver Burgers to DFW Back Yards – Dallas Innovates, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://dallasinnovates.com/he-sent-israels-first-spacecraft-to-the-moon-now-his-flytrex-drones-will-deliver-burgers-to-dfw-back-yards/
28. Yariv Bash – TechAviv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.techaviv.com/people/yariv-bash
29. Delivering The Goods: Israel Leads The Way In Drone Innovation – NoCamels, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://nocamels.com/2016/08/israel-drone-innovation/
30. “I just love to create stuff. You can be a painter, you can be a poet, but you can also be an engineer or a software developer.” | Ctech, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3912875,00.html
31. A Case Study on Integrating Tactical Drones: Israel – Modern War Institute, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://mwi.westpoint.edu/a-case-study-on-integrating-tactical-drones-israel/
32. Uber faces boycott calls over investment in ‘Israeli’ drone firm – Roya News, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://en.royanews.tv/news/63435/Uber-faces-boycott-calls-over-investment-in-‘Israeli’-drone-firm
33. It’s Time to boycott Uber Eats – Canadian BDS Coalition, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://bdscoalition.ca/2025/10/02/its-time-to-boycott-uber-eats/
34. Uber faces criticism after announcing multi-million investment in Israeli drone co.; incl. co. non-response – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uber-faces-criticism-for-announcing-multi-million-investment-in-israeli-drone-co-incl-co-non-response/
35. Uber-style App ‘Careem’ Goes Off Beaten Track in Palestinian West Bank – VOA, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.voanews.com/a/uber-style-app-careem-goes-off-beaten-track-in-west-bank/3950086.html
36. Ma’ale Adumim – Wikipedia, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%27ale_Adumim
37. The “Sovereignty Road” in the area of Al-Azariya-Ma’ale Adumim is advancing to the implementation stage – Peace Now, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://peacenow.org.il/en/the-sovereignty-road-in-the-area-of-al-azariya-maale-adumim-is-advancing-to-the-implementation-stage
38. Ministry bans Careem car transportation company from work in West Bank – WAFA, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/91149
39. ‘A million calls an hour’: Israel relying on Microsoft cloud for expansive surveillance of Palestinians – The Guardian, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-israeli-military-palestinian-phone-calls-cloud
40. Microsoft storing Israeli intelligence trove used to attack Palestinians – +972 Magazine, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/microsoft-8200-intelligence-surveillance-cloud-azure/
41. Supporting Ukraine | Uber Newsroom, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uber.com/en-GR/newsroom/supporting-ukraine/
42. Our support for Ukraine | Uber Newsroom, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uber.com/en-NL/newsroom/support-for-ukraine-2022/
43. Ukraine: Uber restarts service in Kyiv amid Russia’s invasion – Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/ukraine-uber-restarts-service-in-kyiv-amid-russias-invasion/
44. All are welcome – Uber, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.uber.com/us/en/community/all-are-welcome/
45. Five telling words in Uber’s email to employees – Quartz, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://qz.com/work/2163457/five-telling-words-in-the-uber-ceos-letter-to-employees
46. Palestinian restaurant speaks out over Uber Eats mislabeling – YouTube, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikcCT_Gww5o
47. Uber Eats labels Palestinian restaurants in Toronto as ‘Israeli,’ sparking uproar | CBC News, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/uber-eats-palestinian-israel-1.7062884
48. Uber Refers To Its Jewish Employee Resource Group As ‘Jewbers’ – NESN.com, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://nesn.com/2017/03/uber-refers-to-its-jewish-employee-resource-group-as-jewbers/
49. As big tech grows more involved in Gaza, Muslim workers are wrestling with a spiritual crisis | Technology | The Guardian, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/11/big-tech-muslim-workers-gaza-israel
50. Google employees claim they were unlawfully fired after Palestine demonstration, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.courthousenews.com/google-employees-claim-they-were-unlawfully-fired-after-palestine-demonstration/
51. 300 employees accuse Apple of “wrongfully terminating” and punishing workers for expressing pro-Palestine views | Talent | HR Grapevine USA, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.hrgrapevine.com/us/content/article/2024-04-04-300-employees-accuse-apple-of-wrongfully-terminating-workers-for-expressing-pro-palestine-views
52. Uber Faces Human Rights Complaint After Jewish Passenger Expelled from Ride – APL, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://apleu.org/uber-faces-human-rights-complaint-after-jewish-passenger-expelled-from-ride/
53. Woman harasses Uber Eats driver for wearing keffiyeh in New York – YouTube, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xgwHnbpNB3Q
54. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://aubern.uk/