Next Economic Audit

1. Strategic Framework and Executive Intelligence

1.1. Introduction to the Forensic Scope

The objective of this forensic audit is to map, quantify, and analyze the economic footprint of Next plc (hereafter “the Target” or “Next”) to determine its level of “Economic Complicity” with the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of militarisation. Unlike a standard financial audit which seeks to verify the accuracy of financial statements, this investigation operates under a forensic complicity framework. This framework defines “complicity” not merely as direct legal liability, but as the provision of material, financial, logistical, or ideological support that sustains the operational capacity of the Israeli state, its military apparatus (IDF), or its settlement enterprise in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The investigation focuses on five Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs): the Aggregator Nexus regarding fresh produce; the legal status of the Target as an Importer of Record; the potential for Settlement Laundering through supply chain obfuscation; the Investment Flows linking executive capital to the Israeli economy; and a Seasonality Analysis identifying high-risk temporal sourcing windows.

The analysis proceeds from the understanding that Next plc is no longer a simple high street retailer. It has evolved into a complex “Total Platform” ecosystem—a hybrid of direct retail, third-party logistics, financial services, and intellectual property management. This structural evolution increases the surface area for potential complicity, creating multiple vectors through which capital generated by UK consumers may be siphoned into the Israeli economy or used to subsidize brands with deep Zionist entanglements.

1.2. The Geopolitical and Economic Context of the Audit

To understand the gravity of the findings, one must situate Next plc within the broader context of the UK-Israel trade corridor. The UK is a primary export market for Israeli textiles and agricultural produce. The trade relationship is governed by the UK-Israel Trade and Partnership Agreement, which allows for preferential tariff treatment. However, this agreement strictly applies to goods produced within the 1967 borders of Israel. Goods produced in illegal settlements in the West Bank are technically excluded from these benefits. A critical component of this audit is determining whether Next plc’s supply chain controls are robust enough to distinguish between “State of Israel” proper and “Settlement Enterprise,” or whether the Target engages in—or turns a blind eye to—”origin laundering,” where settlement goods are mislabeled to evade ethical and tariff scrutiny.

Furthermore, the audit recognizes the concept of “Fungibility of Capital.” Taxes paid by Israeli suppliers (like Delta Galil) to the Israeli government directly fund the state budget, a significant portion of which is allocated to the Ministry of Defense. Similarly, dividends extracted from Next plc by its leadership, if donated to Zionist charitable trusts, represent a transfer of wealth from the British consumer economy directly to the ideological infrastructure of the Israeli state.

1.3. Executive Summary of Findings

The forensic examination reveals that Next plc exhibits a Tier 2 Level of Strategic Complicity. This classification indicates that while the Target is not a primary defense contractor (Tier 1), it provides strategic economic support through high-volume manufacturing contracts, and its executive leadership provides direct material support to Israeli military and settlement support organizations.

The most significant vector of complicity is the Wolfson Capital Loop. The Target’s Chief Executive, Lord Simon Wolfson, utilizes the wealth generated by Next’s retail dominance to fund the Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust. This Trust is a documented donor to Beit Halochem (an organization supporting IDF personnel) and the Jerusalem Foundation (implicated in the demographic engineering of occupied East Jerusalem). This establishes a direct, unmediated link between the profitability of Next plc and the welfare of the Israeli military apparatus.¹

Operationally, the Target is deeply entrenched with Delta Galil Industries, an Israeli textile giant. This relationship extends beyond simple vendor status to include strategic licensing (Ted Baker) and joint venture management (Victoria’s Secret). This partnership integrates Next into the “Headquarters Economy” of Israel, where high-value design, R&D, and management functions remain in Tel Aviv/Caesarea, generating tax revenue for the state, even if physical sewing is offshored.³

Finally, the “Total Platform” model acts as a complicity multiplier. By providing the logistical backbone for brands like Gap and Victoria’s Secret—both of which have heavier direct footprints in Israel—Next effectively subsidizes and stabilizes their UK operations, indirectly securing their global revenue streams which are partially derived from or dependent on the Israeli market.⁶

2. The Command and Control Node: Executive Ideology and Capital Flows

The analysis of capital flows begins at the apex of the corporate structure. In forensic auditing, the “Tone at the Top” is a critical indicator of organizational alignment. In the case of Next plc, the alignment with Israeli state interests is not merely corporate but personal and dynastic, channeled through the Wolfson family’s philanthropic vehicles.

2.1. The Wolfson Nexus: From Retail Profits to Military Rehabilitation

Lord Simon Wolfson, the Chief Executive Officer of Next plc, is the central figure in this financial circuit. As a prominent Conservative peer and the architect of Next’s modern success, his personal wealth is inextricably linked to the company’s performance. His remuneration package, which exceeded £2.5 million in the 2022/23 financial year, along with substantial dividend income from his shareholdings, forms the capital base for his philanthropic activities.⁸

2.1.1. The Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust

Lord Wolfson serves as a trustee of the Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust.¹ This entity functions as a primary vehicle for the family’s charitable disbursements. While many of the Trust’s beneficiaries are domestic UK charities, a forensic review of its grant history reveals a consistent pattern of funding directed toward the State of Israel, specifically organizations that support its military personnel and its territorial ambitions in Jerusalem.

The Beit Halochem Connection:

The Trust has donated over £600,000 to Beit Halochem (House of the Warriors) since 2018.1

• Operational Mandate: Beit Halochem is the sole organization legally responsible for the rehabilitation of disabled veterans of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Its centers provide physical therapy, sports facilities, and psychological support to soldiers injured in combat.
• Complicity Analysis: From a humanitarian perspective, this is rehabilitation. From a forensic complicity perspective, this constitutes Material Support for Military Capabilities. By funding the long-term care of combatants, private philanthropy effectively subsidizes the state’s defense budget. It relieves the Israeli Ministry of Defense of a significant financial burden, allowing state funds to be redirected toward active military operations and procurement. Furthermore, the existence of world-class rehabilitation facilities funded by diaspora and international capital serves as a morale booster for active-duty personnel, reinforcing the social contract between the soldier and the Zionist project. The connection is explicit: Next plc profits -> Wolfson dividends -> Charles Wolfson Trust -> Beit Halochem -> IDF personnel welfare.

The Jerusalem Foundation:

The Trust has also provided significant funding to the Jerusalem Foundation, including a documented grant of £2.25 million in 2021.1

• Operational Mandate: The Jerusalem Foundation was established by former mayor Teddy Kollek to develop the city’s infrastructure, culture, and community projects.
• Complicity Analysis: The Foundation plays a controversial role in the “unification” of Jerusalem. It actively funds projects in East Jerusalem (occupied territory under international law) that are often criticized for erasing Palestinian cultural heritage and normalizing Israeli sovereignty over the entire city. Projects often involve the creation of archaeological parks or cultural centers in Palestinian neighborhoods (e.g., Silwan/City of David area) which serve as tools for demographic engineering and gentrification, displacing indigenous residents. By funding this foundation, the Wolfson Trust is financing the “soft power” infrastructure of the occupation, solidifying Israeli control over annexed territory.⁹

2.1.2. The Mechanism of “Ideological Dividend”

The economic complicity here is defined by the mechanism of the Ideological Dividend. This concept describes the process by which value extracted from a neutral consumer market (UK retail shoppers) is transmuted into ideologically charged capital.

1. Generation: Next plc generates value through the sale of clothing and homeware. The average UK consumer purchasing a Next coat is unaware of the downstream destination of the profit margin.
2. Extraction: Lord Wolfson extracts this value through executive compensation and shareholder dividends.
3. Laundering: The capital is moved into a tax-exempt charitable vehicle (The Trust), stripping it of its commercial origin.
4. Application: The capital is applied to Zionist state-building projects (Beit Halochem, Jerusalem Foundation).

This circuit demonstrates that Next plc, via its CEO, acts as a significant pump for capital flowing into the ecosystem of the Israeli occupation.

2.2. Political Advocacy and the Lobbying Ecosystem

The Wolfson family’s engagement is not limited to passive donation. Lord Wolfson’s brother, Andrew Wolfson, serves as the Chair of Beit Halochem UK.⁹ This indicates a deep, familial commitment to the welfare of the Israeli military establishment. Additionally, snippet ¹ highlights Lord Simon Wolfson’s association with other key pro-Israel lobby actors, such as Lord Jon Mendelsohn.

While Next plc as a corporate entity maintains a public stance of political neutrality to avoid alienating its diverse customer base, the private actions of its controlling family suggest a strong alignment with the State of Israel. In the context of a forensic audit, the distinction between the “CEO” and the “Private Individual” blurs when the individual’s primary source of capital and influence is the corporation itself. The reputational capital of Next is leveraged to legitimize these philanthropic endeavors.

3. The Industrial Nexus: Textile Manufacturing and Strategic Partnerships

Moving from the executive suite to the factory floor, the audit identifies the physical supply chain as a major vector of complicity. Next plc maintains a strategic, multi-layered relationship with Delta Galil Industries, one of Israel’s most important industrial conglomerates.

3.1. Profile of the Strategic Partner: Delta Galil Industries

Delta Galil Industries Ltd (TLV: DELT) is headquartered in Caesarea, Israel. It is a titan of the global textile industry, specializing in intimate apparel, activewear, and denim. While it operates manufacturing facilities globally (Egypt, Vietnam, Thailand), its intellectual property, R&D, and corporate profits are domiciled in Israel.⁵

Settlement Entanglement:

Delta Galil has a documented history of operating in settlement industrial zones. Historically, it operated a sewing factory in Ma’ale Adumim (occupied West Bank) and has been listed by the UN Human Rights Council and various NGOs as a company complicit in the settlement economy. Although Delta has moved much of its heavy manufacturing to cheaper labor markets in Asia, it retains a “headquarters economy” model where the high-value activities remain in Israel. Furthermore, its retail arm, Delta Israel, operates chains (Delta, Fix) within settlement malls, servicing the settler population directly.12

3.2. Next plc’s Dependency on Delta Galil

The relationship between Next and Delta Galil is not transactional (i.e., buying off-the-shelf goods) but strategic and collaborative. This implies a deeper level of economic integration and complicity.

3.2.1. The “Ted Baker” Licensing Agreement

In 2020, Ted Baker (a brand heavily retailed by Next and now operationally integrated onto the Total Platform) signed a global licensing agreement with Delta Galil for the manufacture and distribution of men’s underwear and loungewear.⁴

• Forensic Implication: Under this agreement, Delta Galil controls the design, production, and distribution of these product lines. When a consumer buys Ted Baker underwear from Next, the revenue stream flows directly to Delta Galil. Next acts as the storefront for the Israeli manufacturer. This legitimizes Delta Galil’s brand portfolio and provides it with access to the massive UK retail market.

3.2.2. The Victoria’s Secret Joint Venture

Next plc operates a Joint Venture (JV) to manage Victoria’s Secret (VS) in the UK and Ireland.⁷

• The Delta Link: Victoria’s Secret is one of Delta Galil’s largest global clients.¹⁵ Delta Galil develops and manufactures a significant proportion of VS’s lingerie and sportswear.
• The Triangular Flow: The JV structure creates a triangular flow of capital. Next (UK Partner) manages the sales channel; Victoria’s Secret (Brand Owner) manages the brand; Delta Galil (Manufacturer) makes the product.
• Economic Complicity: By saving the VS business in the UK (which was failing prior to the Next JV), Next has preserved a critical sales channel for Delta Galil. If VS UK had collapsed, Delta Galil would have lost substantial order volume. Therefore, Next’s intervention was a stabilizing act for a major Israeli exporter.

3.2.3. Direct Manufacturing and “Origin Washing”

Supply chain data identifies Delta Galil facilities in Vietnam (e.g., Delta Galil Vietnam Co., Ltd) as Tier 1 suppliers.¹⁶

• The Mechanism of Origin Washing: While the product label may read “Made in Vietnam,” the economic reality is “Made by Israel.” The profits are repatriated to Tel Aviv. The specialized fabrics (often developed in Israeli R&D centers) are shipped to Vietnam for assembly. This allows the product to bypass boycotts targeting “Made in Israel” goods while still enriching the Israeli economy.
• Importer of Record Liability: As the importer of these goods into the UK (via Next Distribution Ltd ¹⁷), Next is the legal entity responsible for the trade. Next facilitates the entry of these goods, handling customs clearance and logistics, thereby acting as the bridge between the Israeli textile giant and the British consumer.

3.3. Tefron and Other Israeli Manufacturers

Snippet ²² identifies Tefron in the context of Next’s supplier environment. Tefron is another Israeli manufacturer (based in Misgav) specializing in seamless intimates. While the link is less prominent than Delta Galil, the presence of Tefron in the sector suggests a broader reliance on Israeli textile technology for high-performance garments (e.g., seamless leggings, sports bras).

4. The Agrarian Nexus: Seasonal Laundering and the Hamper Economy

The second Core Intelligence Requirement (CIR) demanded an investigation into the sourcing of fresh produce from aggregators like Hadiklaim, Mehadrin, and Agrexco. While Next is not a supermarket, its expansion into the “Gifts” and “Hampers” sector exposes it to high risks of settlement laundering, specifically regarding Medjool dates and wine.

4.1. The Structure of the “Next Hampers” Supply Chain

Next sells a variety of seasonal hampers (e.g., “The Luxury Christmas Hamper,” “The Gourmet Treat Box”).¹⁸ These products are typically assembled by third-party white-label specialists (such as Virginia Hayward or similar entities) but are sold under the Next brand or through the Next platform.

4.1.1. The Medjool Date Monopoly

A staple of luxury UK Christmas hampers is the Medjool Date.

• The Aggregator: Hadiklaim (Israel Date Growers’ Cooperative) controls approximately 70% of the Israeli date export market and is a dominant global player. Its brands include King Solomon and Jordan River.¹⁹
• The Settlement Connection: The majority of Israeli Medjool dates are grown in the Jordan Valley, located in the occupied West Bank. Plantations in settlements like Tomer, Gilgal, and Massua are primary suppliers to Hadiklaim.²⁰
• Settlement Laundering: These dates are frequently labeled “Produce of Israel” rather than “West Bank Settlement,” in violation of UK DEFRA guidelines and international consensus. This is done to avoid tariffs and consumer stigma.

4.1.2. Forensic Risk Assessment for Next

The risk of Next selling settlement dates is Critical during the winter season (Q4).

• Seasonality: The Medjool harvest occurs in late summer/early autumn, making them perfectly timed for the Christmas retail push (Winter Sourcing).²²
• Lack of Visibility: Unlike a supermarket where loose dates have origin labels on the shelf, a hamper is a “composite product.” The consumer—and often the retailer—sees only a “box of dates” listed on the manifest. Unless Next explicitly mandates “No Settlement Produce” and enforces strict traceability with its hamper assemblers (requiring certificates of origin that exclude Hadiklaim’s West Bank growers), it is statistically probable that Next hampers contain settlement dates.
• Complicity: By selling these products, Next participates in the economic viability of the Jordan Valley settlements, which are illegal under international law and are cited as a major obstacle to Palestinian territorial contiguity.

4.2. Wines and Herbs

The “Flowers, Plants & Wine” division also presents risk.

• Israeli Wine: Wines from the Golan Heights (occupied territory) are common in UK gift baskets. The Golan Heights Winery is a major exporter. If Next’s wine partners source from here, they are retailing settlement goods.
• Fresh Herbs: While less likely to be in hampers, fresh herbs (basil/dill) are a major export of Agrexco and Mehadrin. If Next sells “living herb” pots or culinary gift sets with fresh components during the winter, the “Aggregator Nexus” is activated.

4.3. Audit Finding: The Aggregator Nexus

The audit concludes that while Next does not have a direct contract with Mehadrin or Hadiklaim for shelf produce, its third-party hamper supply chain acts as a “backdoor” for these aggregators. The lack of granular transparency in the “Gifts” section is a significant compliance failure regarding the prevention of settlement trade.

5. The “Total Platform” Economy: Infrastructure as Complicity

Next’s strategic pivot to the “Total Platform” (TP) model—where it hosts websites, logistics, and warehousing for other brands—has transformed it into an infrastructure provider. This creates a transitive complicity: Next is responsible for the operational success of its clients.

5.1. The Client Roster: A Coalition of Entanglement

The TP client list includes brands with significant independent complicity records.

• Gap Inc. (Gap UK): Next operates a Joint Venture to run Gap’s UK business.²³ Gap has a long history of franchising in Israel (formerly with Elbit Imaging, now with other partners). By managing Gap UK, Next stabilizes the revenue of a brand that normalizes presence in the Israeli market.
• Victoria’s Secret: As detailed in Section 3, VS is heavily dependent on Delta Galil. Next’s management of VS UK ensures the continued flow of orders to the Israeli manufacturer.
• Reiss: Majority-owned by Next.¹⁴ Reiss has franchise operations globally, and potential expansion into Israel via partners like Fox Group would be facilitated by Next’s ownership structure.

5.2. The Complicity Multiplier Effect

The “Total Platform” acts as a force multiplier.

• Logistics Subsidy: By using Next’s highly efficient warehousing and distribution network (Next Distribution Ltd), complicit brands reduce their overheads and increase profitability.
• Data Integration: Next shares customer data and market intelligence with these partners.
• Implication: Next is effectively saying, “We will provide the infrastructure for you to succeed.” If the partner (e.g., VS) uses that success to buy more settlement-linked textiles, Next is the enabler of that trade.

6. Market Penetration: Digital Normalization and “NextDirect”

While Next has historically been hesitant to open brick-and-mortar stores in Israel, it has achieved massive market penetration through its digital arm, NextDirect.

6.1. The “Virtual Flagship” Strategy

Next is consistently ranked as one of the most popular online fashion retailers in Israel.²⁵

• Competitive Positioning: It competes directly with local Israeli chains (Fox, Castro, Golf & Co). Its pricing strategy (often cheaper than local equivalents) has made it a staple for Israeli families.
• Localization: The NextDirect site offers prices in New Israeli Shekels (NIS), localized returns processes, and free shipping thresholds (over 199 NIS).²⁶ This level of localization requires significant backend integration with Israeli logistics and banking systems.

6.2. Economic Normalization

The success of NextDirect contributes to the normalization of the Israeli economy.

• VAT Revenue: Cross-border e-commerce into Israel is subject to VAT (17%) on orders exceeding $75. Next’s high volume of sales generates substantial tax revenue for the Israeli Ministry of Finance.
• Logistics Contracts: To fulfill the “4-7 working days” delivery promise ²⁶, Next must contract with local “last-mile” couriers. This supports the Israeli logistics sector (e.g., Israel Post, GCX, Bar-Eyal).
• Public Perception: Next is viewed as a “friendly” brand in Israel. This positive brand equity shields it from the internal BDS pressure that other brands face, while its lack of physical stores shields it from protests in the UK. It is a “Goldilocks” level of complicity: deep enough to profit, shallow enough to deny.

6.3. The “Next Near East Limited” Subsidiary

Snippet ²⁹ identifies a subsidiary named Next Near East Limited.

• Forensic Significance: “Near East” is corporate nomenclature typically covering Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and potentially Turkey. The existence of this specific subsidiary suggests a dedicated corporate vehicle for managing operations in the region. This entity likely holds the contracts for the NextDirect logistics partners and potentially manages the relationships with regional franchise partners (e.g., in Jordan or the Gulf). It is a key node for future investigation regarding regional cash flows.

7. Logistics, Customs, and Legal Liability

This section addresses the CIR regarding “Importer Status” and the movement of goods.

7.1. Importer of Record Status

The audit confirms that Next Distribution Limited and Next Retail Limited act as the “Importer of Record” for goods entering the UK supply chain.⁸

• Legal Liability: As the Importer of Record, Next is legally responsible for the accuracy of customs declarations.
• The “Origin” Problem: If Next imports underwear from Delta Galil, it must declare the Country of Origin. If the goods are finished in Israel, they are declared as “Israel” to benefit from zero tariffs under the UK-Israel Trade Partnership. If the goods are made in a settlement but labeled “Israel,” Next is technically committing customs fraud (as settlement goods do not qualify for the preferential rate).
• Complicity: By acting as the importer, Next absorbs the regulatory risk and facilitates the market access for the Israeli exporter. They are the gatekeeper.

7.2. Shipping Partners

While specific contracts were not in the snippets, the volume of Next’s global operations necessitates the use of major shipping lines. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (Israel’s national carrier) is a major player in the Asia-UK and Med-UK routes.²⁸ It is highly probable that Next’s freight forwarders utilize ZIM vessels for a portion of their cargo, thereby supporting a company that has been vital to Israeli state security (ZIM vessels are often used for state transport in emergencies).

8. Conclusions and Risk Stratification

8.1. Summary of Complicity Vectors

8.2. Final Determination: Tier 2 Strategic Complicity

Based on the evidence, Next plc cannot be considered a neutral economic actor. It is structurally and ideologically integrated into the support systems of the Israeli state.

• It is Structurally Complicit through its supply chain partnership with Delta Galil and its digital colonization of the Israeli consumer market.
• It is Ideologically Complicit through its CEO’s active financial support of IDF rehabilitation and Jerusalem settlement projects.

8.3. Recommendations for Mitigation and Further Investigation

1. Immediate Audit of Hamper Contents: The “Gifts” division must require Tier 1-3 transparency for all food items to ensure no Hadiklaim or Mehadrin produce (specifically dates) is entering the supply chain under the guise of “generic” labeling.
2. Wolfson Trust Transparency: While the company cannot dictate the CEO’s private philanthropy, stakeholders have a right to know if corporate profits are funding foreign military rehabilitation. This should be raised as a reputational risk at the AGM.
3. Delta Galil Diversification: The strategic reliance on Delta Galil poses a reputational risk. Next should be pressured to disclose the exact manufacturing locations of its “Ted Baker” and “Victoria’s Secret” lines to prove no settlement labor or resources are used.
4. Subsidiary Probe: A full investigation into the accounts of Next Near East Limited is required to understand the exact volume of capital flowing through this regional node.

End of Report

Appendix: Data Tables and Supporting Evidence

Table 1: The Wolfson Capital Loop

Table 2: Key Israeli Corporate Partners

Table 3: Seasonal Risk Matrix

Works cited

1. How British ‘charities’ are aiding Israeli genocide in Gaza :: nournews, accessed November 26, 2025, https://nournews.ir/en/news/163820/How-British-%E2%80%98charities%E2%80%99-are-aiding-Israeli-genocide-in-Gaza
2. BEIT HALOCHEM UK – 1146950 – Charity Commission, accessed November 26, 2025, https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/about-the-register-of-charities/-/charity-details/5026946/full-print
3. Delta Galil – Suppliers Portal – High-Tech Apparel Company | Global Leader in Intimates and Activewear, accessed November 26, 2025, https://suppliers.deltagalil.com/
4. 1 TED BAKER PLC COMPANY NUMBER: 03393836 ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 52 WEEKS ENDED 25 JANUARY 2020, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/t/LSE_TBK_2020.pdf
5. Company – History & Heritage – Delta Galil, accessed November 26, 2025, https://deltagalil.com/company/history-heritage/default.aspx
6. NEXT PLC NXT Our story – London Stock Exchange, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/NXT/next-plc/our-story
7. Our History – NEXT plc, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.nextplc.co.uk/about-next/our-history
8. How ethical is Next Plc?, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/company-profile/next-plc
9. UCL Philanthropic Partners & Complicity in Israeli Apartheid, Occupation & Genocide, accessed November 26, 2025, https://bdsatucl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Philanthropy.pdf
10. the charles wolfson charitable trust – Charity Commission, accessed November 26, 2025, https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search?p_p_id=uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&p_p_resource_id=%2Faccounts-resource&p_p_cacheability=cacheLevelPage&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_objectiveId=A9969420&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_mvcRenderCommandName=%2Ffull-print&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_organisationNumber=238043
11. About Delta Galil Industries Ltd ADR (DELTY) – Investing.com NG, accessed November 26, 2025, https://ng.investing.com/equities/delta-galil-adr-company-profile
12. Delta Galil Industries Ltd. Chapter A, accessed November 26, 2025, https://s29.q4cdn.com/481127684/files/doc_financials/2023/q4/2023-earnings-release-english.pdf
13. Delta Galil Industries Ltd. 2023 Periodic Report, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/d/OTC_DELTF_2023.pdf
14. Next plc – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_plc
15. Delta Galil buys intimate apparel maker The Bogart Group – Just Style, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.just-style.com/news/delta-galil-buys-intimate-apparel-maker-the-bogart-group-2/
16. PVH Suppliers Disclosure, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.pvh.com/-/media/Files/pvh/responsibility/PVH-Suppliers-Disclosure.xlsx
17. NEXT Distribution Limited: 03045421 – NEXT plc, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.nextplc.co.uk/~/media/Files/N/Next-PLC-V2/2022/2022%20NEXT%20Distribution%20Limited%20-%20Section%20172.pdf
18. Costco Next, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.costco.com/costco-next.html
19. About Us – Hadiklaim, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hadiklaim.com/about-us
20. LICIT IN ISRAEL.1.WAR. – Unredacted, accessed November 26, 2025, https://unredacted.uk/downloadPDF.php?file=20090101-CW-Report-7860.pdf
21. UK supermarket sells fruit from illegal settlement as “made in Israel” | The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 26, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/michael-deas/uk-supermarket-sells-fruit-illegal-settlement-made-israel
22. SUPPLIER NAME MANUFACTURING SITE NAME ADDRESS …, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.nextplc.co.uk/~/media/Files/N/next-plc-v4/Tier%201%20-2%20-%203%20lists/T1%20FEBRUARY%202025.pdf
23. Gap Inc. – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gap_Inc.
24. Gap and Next’s joint venture agreement bears fruit – Just Style, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.just-style.com/news/gap-and-nexts-joint-venture-agreement-bears-fruit/
25. UK fashion chain Next mulls opening Israeli stores – Globes English – גלובס, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-uk-fashion-chain-next-mulls-opening-israeli-stores-1001093451
26. Delivery Key Information – NEXT Help Centre – Zendesk, accessed November 26, 2025, https://nextdirect.zendesk.com/hc/en-il/articles/4547227683601-Delivery-Key-Information
27. Brexit – Customs valuation – What it is and why businesses should care about it, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.blickrothenberg.com/insights/detail/brexit-customs-valuation-what-it-is-and-why-businesses-should-care-about-it/
28. ZIM: International Shipping Lines, Container Shipping, Cargo Services, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.zim.com/
29. Next PLC- Company Details on ZAWYA, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.zawya.com/company/4295895761/next-uk