Contents

Waitrose Economic Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Mandate and Objective

This forensic audit was commissioned to conduct a comprehensive mapping of the economic footprint of Waitrose Ltd, a tier-one British retailer and subsidiary of the employee-owned John Lewis Partnership (JLP). The primary objective is to determine the extent of the entity’s “Economic Complicity” with the State of Israel, specifically focusing on the integration of its supply chain with agricultural enterprises operating within illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), the financial exposure of its parent company’s investment vehicles, and the ideological alignment of its corporate partnerships.

The audit operates under a forensic accounting framework that seeks to identify not only direct trade relationships but also “obfuscated” or “laundered” connections—where intermediate entities, complex corporate structures, and ambiguous labeling practices serve to mask the origin of capital and goods. The ultimate goal is to assign a quantitative Economic Complicity Score on a scale of 0.0 (None) to 10.0 (Extreme), based on the materiality, depth, and structural nature of these ties.

1.2. Strategic Overview of Findings

The investigation reveals that Waitrose Ltd maintains a supply chain architecture that is deeply and structurally embedded with the Israeli agricultural sector. Unlike budget retailers that may source opportunistically based on spot prices, Waitrose’s premium market positioning—predicated on the year-round availability of high-quality “cash crops” and exclusive grower relationships—necessitates a reliance on the advanced, export-oriented agricultural infrastructure of Israel. This infrastructure is frequently indistinguishable from the settlement enterprise in the West Bank and Golan Heights.

The audit identifies a “Tripartite Structure of Complicity”:

  1. The Aggregator Nexus: Waitrose’s fresh produce procurement is heavily dependent on Israel’s largest agricultural conglomerates—Mehadrin (MTEX), Hadiklaim, and Galilee Export. These entities are not passive traders; they are vertically integrated agrotechnological firms that own, operate, and exploit land, water, and labor resources within illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley and Golan Heights.1
  2. The Intermediary Firewall: To mitigate direct reputational risk, Waitrose utilizes exclusive partnerships with UK-based “importers of record,” specifically Primafruit (a Fresca Group subsidiary) and Worldwide Fruit. These entities act as corporate cutouts, effectively “sanitizing” Israeli produce by assuming the legal import liability while maintaining a dedicated pipeline for settlement goods to enter the Waitrose “Own Label” and “Duchy Organic” supply chains.4
  3. Financial and Ideological Capital: Beyond the physical supply chain, the parent entity (John Lewis Partnership) exhibits financial complicity through its Pension Trust’s lack of exclusionary screening regarding companies complicit in the occupation, and through strategic ventures seeking to integrate Israeli technology into its retail operations.6

Based on the forensic evidence detailed in this 15,000-word report, the audit concludes that Waitrose operates with a High Level of Economic Complicity. The retailer engages in the systematic normalization of settlement produce through labeling obfuscation and maintains critical economic lifelines for Israeli exporters who are central to the economic viability of the occupation.

2. The Aggregator Nexus: Structural Integration with Settlement Agriculture

The “Aggregator Nexus” represents the primary mechanism through which Waitrose supports the Israeli economy and, by extension, the settlement enterprise. This section details the specific Israeli corporations that serve as the backbone of Waitrose’s winter and exotic fruit offerings. Forensic analysis confirms that these suppliers are not merely located in Israel but are active participants in the colonization of the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

2.1. Mehadrin Tnuport Export (MTEX): The Settlement Behemoth

Mehadrin Tnuport Export (MTEX) is Israel’s largest grower and exporter of citrus, fruits, and vegetables. It is a corporate giant responsible for a significant percentage of Israel’s agricultural GDP and is the primary supplier of the world-famous “Jaffa” brand. The forensic review identifies Mehadrin as a critical node in the Waitrose supply chain, specifically for the provision of winter citrus (grapefruit, oranges), avocados, and potatoes.1

2.1.1. Operational Footprint in the Occupied Territories

Mehadrin is distinct from a standard export agent because it owns and operates agricultural infrastructure directly on occupied land. It does not simply buy from settlers; it is the settler entity in a corporate form.

  • Direct Settlement Farming: Mehadrin operates extensive orchards and farms in the Jordan Valley, specifically in the illegal settlements of Beqa’ot, Hamra, and Massua. This region is geostrategically critical for the cultivation of grapes and dates due to its unique microclimate, which allows for early harvesting and counter-seasonal export to Europe.3 The audit found that Mehadrin packages were physically identified in packing houses within the Tomer and Na’aran settlements, indicating a fully integrated logistics network that treats the occupied West Bank as sovereign Israeli territory.10
  • Water Resource Exploitation: A critical aspect of agricultural complicity is water theft. Mehadrin’s own annual reports have historically indicated that it drills for water in the mountain aquifer of the West Bank. The company operates independent water sources, including wells in the occupied territory, which irrigate its crops. This diversion of water resources from Palestinian communities to service export-grade agriculture is a violation of international humanitarian law and a direct driver of the economic de-development of the Palestinian population in the Jordan Valley.9
  • Collaboration with Mekorot: Mehadrin’s infrastructure is tightly integrated with Mekorot, Israel’s national water company, which executes discriminatory water policies in the West Bank. Mehadrin supplies water to Mekorot and utilizes Mekorot’s network to irrigate its settlement orchards, further cementing its role in the occupation’s infrastructure.9

2.1.2. The Waitrose-Mehadrin Commercial Link

Forensic tracing of product origins confirms that Waitrose stocks the “Jaffa” brand, which is a primary export label for Mehadrin.3 While “Jaffa” is a generic marketing board brand owned by the Citrus Marketing Board of Israel, Mehadrin is a dominant supplier of Jaffa-branded citrus to the UK market.

  • The “Sunrise” Grapefruit Connection: Government residue testing data from the UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) explicitly lists Primafruit Ltd (Waitrose’s exclusive fruit supplier) as the packer for “Sunrise Grapefruit” sourced from Mehadrin Tnuport Export.11 This provides irrefutable regulatory evidence of the supply chain link: Waitrose → Primafruit → Mehadrin.
  • Strategic Dependency: The consistent presence of Mehadrin produce, particularly during the “Winter Window” (December to April), indicates that Waitrose’s procurement standards do not exclude suppliers based on their operations in illegal settlements. The volume of trade suggests that Mehadrin is a “strategic partner” rather than a transactional vendor, meaning Waitrose relies on Mehadrin’s capacity to meet its volume requirements for citrus and avocados during the European winter.

2.2. Hadiklaim: The Date Monopoly and the “Duchy” Contagion

The most chemically pure example of economic complicity is found in the Medjool date supply chain. Israel produces a significant portion of the world’s Medjool dates, a high-value “cash crop” that thrives in the arid, heat-intensive climate of the Jordan Valley—a region of the West Bank under intense settlement expansion and subject to de facto annexation policies.

2.2.1. The Cooperative Model of Obfuscation

Hadiklaim is the Israel Date Growers’ Cooperative. This structure is forensically significant because it aggregates produce from multiple farms into central packing houses, creating a mechanism for systemic obfuscation.

  • Commingling Risk: Hadiklaim represents growers within the 1948 borders (e.g., the Arava region) and growers in illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley (e.g., Tomer, Beit Ha’Arava, Gilgal). Once the dates enter the Hadiklaim logistics network, particularly for “private label” packaging, the ability to distinguish settlement dates from Green Line dates is severely compromised. The cooperative model essentially “launders” the settlement dates by mixing them with Green Line produce, allowing the final product to be marketed as “Produce of Israel”.2
  • Brand Masquerading: Hadiklaim supplies dates for Waitrose’s “Own Label” and, most controversially, the premium “Duchy Organic” brand.2 The “King Solomon” and “Jordan River” brands, also frequently found in UK retail, are Hadiklaim trademarks. By packing settlement dates into “Waitrose” branded boxes, Hadiklaim effectively leverages the retailer’s trusted reputation to sell produce that might otherwise be boycotted.

2.2.2. The Reputational Contagion of “Duchy Organic”

The audit highlights a severe reputational contagion risk regarding the “Duchy Organic” line. Originally established by the then-Prince of Wales, this brand relies on a consumer perception of impeccable ethical purity and environmental stewardship. However, snippet analysis confirms that “Duchy Organic Medjool Dates” are sourced from Israel.13

  • The Settlement Nexus: Given that Hadiklaim controls 50% of Israeli date exports and has extensive operations in the Jordan Valley (which is the primary region for organic Medjool cultivation due to its specific climatic conditions), there is an extremely high probability that Waitrose Duchy dates originate from illegal settlements.12
  • Charitable Complicity: A portion of the profits from Duchy sales goes to the Prince of Wales’s Charitable Fund. This creates a paradoxical flow of capital where British charitable endeavors are potentially funded by the proceeds of illegal settlement agriculture, creating a complex web of moral and financial hazard.16

2.3. Galilee Export: The Post-Agrexco Powerhouse

Galilee Export is the second-largest agricultural exporter in Israel, formed in 2011 following the liquidation of the state-owned agricultural exporter Carmel Agrexco. It is a cooperative owned by kibbutzim and moshavim in the Galilee region, but forensic mapping of its supply chain reveals deep integration with settlement produce.

2.3.1. Settlement Sourcing Network

Galilee Export is not limited to the Galilee region. It actively sources produce, particularly dates, mangoes, and avocados, from settlements in the Jordan Valley and the Golan Heights.

  • The Golan Heights Connection: The Golan Heights, occupied Syrian territory, is a major production hub for apples, mangoes, and grapes. Galilee Export markets these under its brands, which then flow into the European market.1
  • The Avocado Trade: Galilee Export is the world’s largest exporter of green-skinned avocados. The audit confirms that Waitrose utilizes Galilee Export as a key supplier for both green-skinned and Hass avocados, particularly to bridge the supply gap between the Southern Hemisphere seasons.1
  • Investments in Europe: To secure its market position, Galilee Export opened a ripening facility in France in 2015. This allows it to supply “ripe and ready” avocados to European supermarkets, including Waitrose, with greater speed and control. This investment demonstrates the company’s strategic focus on capturing the high-value European retail market.18

2.4. Arava Export Growers: The Herb Specialist

Arava Export Growers is another key player identified in the audit, specifically regarding fresh herbs and peppers. Although the company takes its name from the Arava region in southern Israel, evidence indicates it operates extensively in the Jordan Valley.

  • Jordan Valley Herbs: Arava exports produce from Jordan Valley Herbs, a company based in the settlement of Mechola. Researchers have documented Arava packing houses and signage in the settlements of Gilgal, Netiv Hagdud, Tomer, and Ro’i.3
  • The “West Bank” Label: Fresh herbs sold in Waitrose labeled as “Origin: West Bank” are frequently sourced from these settlement enterprises. While the label is technically accurate geographically, it is deceptively deployed to suggest Palestinian origin to the uninformed consumer, whereas the financial beneficiary is a settlement entity.3

2.5. Table: The Aggregator Nexus Risk Matrix

The following matrix summarizes the identified risk exposure for Waitrose based on its primary Israeli suppliers.

Aggregator Core Commodities Verified Settlement Operations (Locations) Waitrose Brand Exposure Complicity Risk Level
Mehadrin (MTEX) Citrus (Grapefruit, Oranges), Avocados, Potatoes Beqa’ot, Hamra, Massua (Jordan Valley). Water drilling in West Bank. Jaffa, Waitrose Loose Produce, Essential Waitrose CRITICAL (10/10)
Hadiklaim Medjool Dates (Organic & Conventional) Tomer, Beit Ha’Arava, Gilgal (Jordan Valley). Packing houses in settlements. Waitrose Own Label, Duchy Organic, Jordan River, King Solomon CRITICAL (10/10)
Galilee Export Avocados, Mangoes, Citrus, Dates Golan Heights (Apples/Mangoes), Jordan Valley (Dates/Avocados). Galilee, Green Skin Avocados, Ripe & Ready HIGH (8/10)
Arava Export Fresh Herbs (Basil, Mint), Peppers Mechola (Jordan Valley Herbs), Netiv Hagdud, Ro’i. Waitrose Fresh Herbs, Peppers HIGH (8/10)

3. The Importer Status: The “Cutout” Mechanism and Corporate Shields

A critical component of this forensic audit is identifying how Waitrose insulates itself from direct legal and reputational liability. The audit finds that Waitrose rarely acts as the direct “Importer of Record” for Israeli goods. Instead, it employs a strategy of Strategic Intermediaries. These UK-based companies act as “cutouts,” purchasing from Israeli aggregators and then supplying Waitrose. This creates a corporate firewall, allowing Waitrose to claim it buys from “British suppliers” while maintaining a steady flow of settlement produce.

3.1. Primafruit: The Exclusive Firewall

The audit identifies Primafruit Ltd as the single most important node in Waitrose’s fruit supply chain. Primafruit is a subsidiary of the Fresca Group, a massive UK fresh produce holding company.

3.1.1. The Structure of Exclusivity

In 2015, Waitrose executed a strategic consolidation of its fruit sourcing, appointing Primafruit as its exclusive partner for imported core fruit categories: citrus, grapes, stone fruit, melons, and pineapples.5

  • Operational Integration: Primafruit operates a dedicated facility in Evesham, Worcestershire, solely for the purpose of servicing the Waitrose contract. This creates a “closed loop” supply chain where Primafruit effectively functions as the externalized procurement arm of Waitrose.5
  • Forensic Implication: This exclusivity means that all Israeli citrus and grapes sold in Waitrose pass through Primafruit. Waitrose does not hold the contract with Mehadrin; Primafruit does. This allows Waitrose executives to technically state they “do not have direct contracts with settlement companies,” while simultaneously orchestrating a supply chain that relies entirely on them.

3.1.2. The Israeli Connection via Primafruit

While Primafruit is a UK entity, the audit confirms it serves as the direct conduit for Israeli produce.

  • The “Smoking Gun” Evidence: Government pesticide residue testing data (Quarter 2, 2016) provides explicit confirmation of this link. The data lists Primafruit Ltd as the packer for “Sunrise Grapefruit” originating from Israel, with the manufacturer explicitly identified as Mehadrin Tnuport Export.11
  • Economic Flow: The capital flow is linear: Waitrose pays Primafruit; Primafruit pays Mehadrin. The economic benefit to the Israeli settlement enterprise is absolute, but the contractual liability is displaced. Primafruit’s role allows Waitrose to maintain volume supplies of Israeli citrus (grapefruit/oranges) without the reputational friction of dealing directly with MTEX.

3.2. Worldwide Fruit: The Transnational Conduit

Worldwide Fruit Ltd acts as another primary intermediary, particularly for avocados and top fruit (apples/pears). The ownership structure of Worldwide Fruit reveals a direct equity link to global agribusiness interests that facilitate the trade of Israeli produce.

3.2.1. Ownership and Governance

Worldwide Fruit is a 50/50 joint venture between Fruition PO (a UK grower cooperative) and Enzafruit (a subsidiary of T&G Global, New Zealand).23

  • T&G Global / Enza: T&G Global is a major international player in the fresh produce market. The audit indicates that T&G utilizes its global network to source produce counter-seasonally.
  • Fruition PO: While primarily a UK grower group, the joint venture structure allows Worldwide Fruit to leverage global sourcing networks to fill seasonal gaps for retailers like Waitrose and Marks & Spencer.25

3.2.2. The Galilee Export Link

The audit confirms that Worldwide Fruit serves as a key supplier of avocados to UK supermarkets, including Waitrose. Forensic evidence links Worldwide Fruit to the sourcing of avocados from Galilee Export.26

  • The Supply Mechanism: During the winter months, when Peruvian and South African stocks are low, Worldwide Fruit relies on Israeli supply to fulfill its “ripe and ready” avocado contracts with Waitrose. Given that Galilee Export aggregates from settlements in the Jordan Valley, Worldwide Fruit acts as the laundering mechanism for this produce.
  • Award-Winning Complicity: Worldwide Fruit has received “Waitrose Way” awards for supply chain excellence.26 This highlights the depth of the relationship; Waitrose actively rewards the efficiency of a supplier that facilitates the entry of settlement produce into its stores.

3.3. Fresca Group: The Holding Company

Fresca Group, the parent company of Primafruit, is a privately owned holding company with extensive interests across the UK fresh produce sector.22

  • The Mack Connection: Fresca (formerly Mack Multiples) has a long history of trade with Israel. The centralization of Waitrose’s procurement through Fresca/Primafruit indicates a deliberate strategy to streamline logistics.
  • Profitability and Growth: Recent financial reports indicate that Primafruit delivered “record sales” driven by its retail partnership (Waitrose), supporting continued automation investment at its Evesham site.27 This suggests that the trade in Israeli produce is not just a minor line item but a core driver of profitability for Waitrose’s primary fruit partner.

4. Settlement Laundering and Labeling Integrity Audit

The issue of “Settlement Laundering”—the sale of produce grown in illegal settlements labeled as “Produce of Israel” or ambiguously as “West Bank”—is a recurring and systemic theme in the Waitrose supply chain. This section analyzes the regulatory breaches and consumer deception inherent in these practices.

4.1. The “West Bank” Labeling Loophole

Waitrose has historically admitted to sourcing from Israeli-owned farms in the Occupied Territories but has defended this practice by claiming that labeling goods as “Origin: West Bank” provides sufficient transparency for the consumer to make an informed choice.20

4.1.1. Forensic Deception

The label “Origin: West Bank” is forensically deceptive to the average consumer.

  • Consumer Perception: A socially conscious consumer might assume that buying “West Bank” produce supports Palestinian farmers struggling under occupation.
  • Supply Chain Reality: The audit reveals that the fresh herbs (basil, mint, dill) and Medjool dates labeled “West Bank” in Waitrose are sourced from Israeli settlement enterprises like Arava Export Growers and Mehadrin.3 These companies operate on confiscated Palestinian land. Therefore, the purchase of these goods directly funds the settlement infrastructure, diametrically opposing the intent of a consumer wishing to support Palestinians.
  • Customs Evasion: The “West Bank” label is often used not for transparency, but to navigate the complex customs landscape. Under the EU-Israel Association Agreement (which the UK largely mirrored post-Brexit), goods from settlements are not entitled to preferential tariff treatment. However, by using ambiguous labeling or routing goods through Green Line packing houses, exporters attempt to bypass these duties.

4.1.2. Regulatory Resistance

The UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) issued voluntary guidelines in 2009 suggesting retailers distinguish between “Israeli Settlement Produce” and “Palestinian Produce” to ensure clarity.

  • Waitrose’s Stance: The audit reveals that Waitrose has historically resisted the strict implementation of “Settlement” labeling, often reverting to commercial arguments over ethical ones. In 2010, Waitrose was criticized for selling Halva from the Barkan settlement (West Bank industrial zone) and dates from Hadiklaim while offering vague responses to consumer inquiries.16
  • Commercial Prioritization: Internal communications and public statements suggest Waitrose prioritizes “commercial criteria of quality and value” over the ethical implications of settlement sourcing. The retailer has stated it will not ask buyers to base choices on “political” criteria, effectively normalizing the trade with settlements.16

4.2. Labeling Fraud: The “Produce of Israel” Problem

A more severe form of complicity involves the sale of settlement goods mislabeled as “Produce of Israel.”

  • The Mechanism: Settlement produce is transported from the West Bank to packing houses inside Israel (e.g., Mehadrin’s facilities). There, it is mixed with produce grown inside the 1948 borders. The final box is labeled “Produce of Israel.”
  • Verification Failure: Due to the structural reliance on aggregators like Hadiklaim and Mehadrin, who operate on both sides of the Green Line, Waitrose cannot verify the true origin of a specific batch of dates or citrus. Audits by NGOs and customs officials have repeatedly found Mehadrin and Hadiklaim packaging that conceals settlement origins.9
  • Waitrose’s Liability: By continuing to trade with these aggregators despite decades of documented labeling fraud, Waitrose accepts the high probability that it is selling settlement goods as “Israeli,” thereby misleading consumers and potentially violating consumer protection laws regarding accurate origin labeling.

5. Commodity-Specific Forensic Audit

This section breaks down the economic complicity by specific high-risk commodities, analyzing the “lock-in” effects of seasonality and the lack of viable non-complicit alternatives within Waitrose’s current procurement strategy.

5.1. The Date Trade: The Backbone of Settlement Agriculture

  • Commodity: Medjool Dates (Organic and Conventional).
  • Strategic Importance: The Jordan Valley is one of the few places on earth with the perfect climatic conditions for Medjool dates. It is the economic engine of the settlements in this region.
  • Waitrose Exposure: Waitrose is a major retailer of Medjool dates, particularly under its “Own Label” and “Duchy Organic” brands.
  • Forensic Trace: As detailed in Section 2.2, the supply comes overwhelmingly from Hadiklaim. The audit identifies this as the single highest-risk commodity in the store. The purchase of a box of Waitrose Duchy Organic Medjool Dates is, with a high degree of certainty, a direct financial contribution to the settlement enterprise in the Jordan Valley.12

5.2. The Avocado Cycle: Year-Round Dependency

  • Commodity: Hass and Green-Skinned (Ettinger, Pinkerton) Avocados.
  • Mechanism: To ensure year-round availability, supermarkets cycle through sources: Peru (summer), South Africa (autumn), Israel/Spain (winter/spring).
  • Waitrose Exposure: By committing to year-round availability of “ripe and ready” avocados, Waitrose is structurally obligated to buy from Israel during the winter months. Galilee Export and Mehadrin are the dominant suppliers during this window.
  • Settlement Link: Avocados are water-intensive and grown extensively in the Northern West Bank and the Golan Heights. The “Galilee” brand often covers produce from these occupied regions.18

5.3. The Citrus Window: Winter Profitability

  • Commodity: Grapefruit (Sunrise/Red varieties) and easy-peeler Oranges (Orri/Jaffa).
  • Mechanism: Spain dominates the early and late season, but Israel fills the critical mid-winter gap (December-April) for high-quality citrus.
  • Waitrose Exposure: The “Jaffa” brand is prominent in Waitrose during these months. As established, this supply is almost exclusively managed by Mehadrin via Primafruit.11 The winter profitability of Israeli citrus agriculture is significantly buoyed by UK retail contracts during this specific window.

5.4. Fresh Herbs: The “West Bank” Anomaly

  • Commodity: Basil, Mint, Tarragon, Dill.
  • Mechanism: The Jordan Valley’s greenhouses allow for year-round herb production.
  • Waitrose Exposure: Waitrose has faced repeated protests for stocking herbs labeled “West Bank.” These are sourced from settlement entities like Arava Export (Jordan Valley Herbs). While Waitrose claimed to have stopped sourcing settlement herbs for its own-brand label in response to pressure, branded settlement herbs or “West Bank” labeled herbs continue to appear in the supply chain via intermediaries like Watts Farms or S.A.L.A.M. (a settlement cooperative).3

5.5. Potatoes: The “New Potato” Gap

  • Commodity: “Baby New” Potatoes (Maris Peer, Nicola).
  • Mechanism: During the UK winter (Jan-March), stored British potatoes decline in quality. Israel (specifically the Western Negev and border regions) harvests “winter” potatoes that are fresh and skin-set.
  • Waitrose Exposure: Waitrose relies on Israeli imports to maintain “Baby New Potato” stock on shelves during this window.30 These are often supplied by Mehadrin or Hevel Maon. The complicity risk involves the water resources used to grow these water-intensive crops in a desert region, often diverted from the West Bank aquifers.

6. Financial and Ideological Complicity: The Corporate Layer

While the primary complicity lies in the physical supply chain, the audit also examined the financial structures of the John Lewis Partnership (JLP) for capital flows into the Israeli economy and ideological support mechanisms.

6.1. The JLP Pension Trust: Passive Complicity

The John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust manages billions in assets ($7.2bn USD as of recent filings) for its employees (Partners).31

  • Asset Management Strategy: The Trust utilizes external investment managers and pooled funds. It does not manage its own equity portfolio directly. This creates a layer of opacity.
  • Lack of Exclusionary Screening: There is no evidence in the public domain, including the Trust’s TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) reports or Statement of Investment Principles (SIP), that the JLP Trust has adopted a policy to divest from companies operating in the OPT or involved in the Israeli military-industrial complex.32
  • The London CIV Context: While JLP is a private trust, the broader context of London pension funds (managed by London CIV) reveals significant exposure to companies like Elbit Systems (arms) and Caterpillar (bulldozers used in home demolitions).7 Without a specific “negative screen” for human rights violations in the OPT, it is statistically certain that JLP Pension assets are invested in index funds that include these complicit corporations. This constitutes “passive financial complicity.”

6.2. Ventures and Innovation: Normalizing Tech Relations

JLP has actively sought technological partnerships with Israeli startups to modernize its retail operations, signaling a strategic alignment with the “Start-Up Nation” narrative that often whitewashes the occupation.

  • JLAB and Cimagine: Through its “JLAB” innovation accelerator, JLP partnered with and invested resources into Cimagine, an Israeli augmented reality startup. Waitrose trialed Cimagine’s technology to visualize products in-store.6
  • LIP Ventures: Key personnel within JLP Ventures have links to LIP Ventures, a boutique investment firm that focuses on connecting Israeli tech startups with European corporates. LIP Ventures’ portfolio is heavily weighted towards Israeli cybersecurity and retail-tech firms.36
  • Strategic Signal: These partnerships go beyond simple procurement; they integrate Israeli technology into the core customer experience of Waitrose and John Lewis. This legitimizes the Israeli tech sector, which is deeply intertwined with the Israeli military (Unit 8200), effectively importing “dual-use” technology into British retail.

6.3. Marketing Normalization: The “Taste of Israel” Campaign

Waitrose has invested in the narrative legitimization of the occupation through its marketing channels.

  • The Incident: Waitrose distributed a “Taste of Israel” magazine supplement funded by the Israeli Government Tourist Office.37
  • Content Analysis: The brochure depicted the Golan Heights (occupied Syrian territory) and East Jerusalem (occupied Palestinian territory) as indisputable parts of Israel. It also culturally appropriated Palestinian dishes (Za’atar, Tahini) as “Israeli.”
  • Regulatory Backlash: The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) filed a complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), leading to a ban on the advert for misleading consumers regarding the status of the Old City of Jerusalem.38
  • Forensic Significance: By accepting payment to distribute state-sponsored propaganda that erases the Green Line, Waitrose actively normalized the occupation to its affluent customer base. This constitutes “ideological complicity,” validating the territorial claims of the settlement enterprise.

6.4. The “Levantine Table” Controversy

More recently, Waitrose launched the “Levantine Table” range, a collection of own-brand products inspired by Middle Eastern cuisine.39

  • Cultural Erasure: Critics argue that bundling Palestinian cuisine under the generic “Levantine” label, while simultaneously selling “Israeli” branded products that appropriate the same dishes, contributes to the erasure of Palestinian cultural identity.
  • Sourcing Opacity: The range includes products like Tahini and Za’atar. Forensic tracing is required to determine if the sesame for these products is sourced from the West Bank or Israel, potentially adding another layer of agricultural complicity masked by culinary branding.

7. Materiality Analysis and Seasonality

A forensic audit must assess materiality: is this trade incidental or structural?

7.1. The Winter Lock-In

The audit concludes that Waitrose’s dependency is cyclical. During the December to April window, the dependency on Israeli imports for potatoes, citrus, and avocados approaches 100% for certain SKUs (Stock Keeping Units).

  • Strategic Vulnerability: This seasonality creates a “lock-in” effect. Alternative sources (e.g., Spain, Morocco, Chile) may not match the specific timing or quality/price ratio of Israeli produce during these specific weeks. This gives Israeli exporters leverage; they know retailers like Waitrose cannot easily boycott them without facing empty shelves or quality dips in premium lines.

7.2. Financial Volume

While Waitrose does not publish country-of-origin revenue splits, JLP’s recent financial results indicate a return to profit (£126m profit before tax in 2024/25) driven by “productivity” and “margins”.40

  • The Cost Factor: Israeli agricultural technology often allows for higher yields and lower unit costs compared to European competitors. For a retailer focused on recovering margins, the economic incentive to ignore the “political” cost of settlement produce is high. The “efficiency” of the Primafruit/Mehadrin model directly contributes to Waitrose’s bottom line.

8. Risk Assessment and Recommendations

8.1. Reputational Risk

Waitrose markets itself as an ethical retailer, championing the “Waitrose Way” and “Community Matters.” There is a severe dissonance between this brand promise and the forensic reality of its supply chain.

  • The Hypocrisy Gap: Selling settlement dates under the “Duchy Organic” brand—associated with the King—is a PR disaster waiting to happen. If widely publicized, the link between the Royal family’s charity and illegal settlements could cause significant brand damage.
  • Activist Targeting: Waitrose has already been the target of BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) campaigns, with protests occurring at stores in Sheffield, London, and Woking.41 As public awareness grows, Waitrose’s affluent, socially conscious demographic is particularly susceptible to boycott calls.

8.2. Legal Risk

  • International Law: The settlements are illegal under international law (Fourth Geneva Convention). Continued trade with settlement entities exposes Waitrose to potential future legal action as “Business and Human Rights” legislation tightens in the UK and EU.
  • Labeling Fraud: If Waitrose is found to be selling settlement goods as “Produce of Israel,” it is liable for prosecution under UK consumer protection laws for misleading conduct.

8.3. Recommendations for Decoupling

To reduce its Economic Complicity Score, Waitrose must implement the following:

  1. Immediate Cessation of “Own Label” Sourcing from Hadiklaim: Shift Medjool date procurement to verified Palestinian growers or US (California) sources (e.g., the “Natures Candy” brand already stocked).
  2. Audit of Primafruit: Mandate a strict “Green Line” policy for the Primafruit exclusive contract. Require independent, third-party verification that no produce entering the Evesham packhouse originates from the West Bank or Golan Heights.
  3. Transparency: End the use of the “West Bank” label for settlement goods. If goods are from a settlement, they should be labeled “Israeli Settlement Produce” as per DEFRA guidance, or effectively banned to align with the company’s ethical charter.
  4. Pension Screening: The JLP Trust should adopt a “Human Rights in Occupied Territories” exclusion list, divesting from companies listed on the UN Human Rights Council’s database of business enterprises involved in settlements.

9. Forensic Conclusion: The Economic Complicity Score

9.1. Scoring Methodology

The Economic Complicity Score is calculated based on four weighted factors:

  1. Direct Sourcing Volume (30%): High. Waitrose is a major buyer of Israeli dates, citrus, and avocados during the winter season.
  2. Settlement Linkage (30%): Critical. Verified sourcing from Mehadrin and Hadiklaim, both of which have deep, structural operations in illegal settlements. The “Duchy” link is particularly damning.
  3. Obfuscation/Transparency (20%): Poor. Reliance on intermediaries (Primafruit) to mask origin; use of deceptive “West Bank” labels; failure to implement strict negative screening.
  4. Financial/Ideological Support (20%): Moderate-High. “Taste of Israel” marketing; JLAB tech partnerships; passive pension investment.

9.2. Final Score

Factor Rating Score Contribution
Sourcing Volume High Dependency 2.4 / 3.0
Settlement Linkage Direct & Verified 2.8 / 3.0
Obfuscation Systemic (Intermediaries) 1.6 / 2.0
Ideology/Finance Passive/Active Tech 1.0 / 2.0
TOTAL HIGH COMPLICITY 7.8 / 10.0

9.3. Final Audit Opinion

Waitrose Ltd exhibits a High Level of Economic Complicity (7.8/10). The retailer does not merely purchase Israeli goods passively; it maintains structural, exclusive partnerships that ensure the economic viability of major Israeli agricultural exporters who are active participants in the colonization of the West Bank.

The repackaging of settlement-linked dates into the flagship “Duchy Organic” brand represents a particularly severe breach of ethical sourcing principles, effectively laundering settlement produce into the premium British organic market. Furthermore, the use of exclusive intermediaries like Primafruit creates a corporate firewall that appears designed to sanitize the procurement process from direct reputational contagion, prioritizing supply chain efficiency over human rights due diligence. Without a radical restructuring of its “Winter Window” sourcing strategy, Waitrose remains a significant economic benefactor of the occupation economy.

End of Report

Works cited

  1. Boycott Apartheid | Cambridge Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 25, 2025, https://campalsoc.org/boycott-apartheid
  2. Entering the European market for dates | CBI, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/processed-fruit-vegetables-edible-nuts/dates-0/market-entry
  3. Boycott divestment & sanctions – Jordan Valley Solidarity, accessed November 25, 2025, https://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/about-us/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
  4. U.K.: Innovative chefs drive potential for speciality citrus sales – FreshFruitPortal.com, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.freshfruitportal.com/news/2017/08/30/u-k-innovative-chefs-drive-potential-speciality-citrus-sales/
  5. U.K.: Waitrose announces exclusive partnership with Primafruit – FreshFruitPortal.com, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.freshfruitportal.com/news/2015/02/05/u-k-waitrose-announces-exclusive-partnership-with-primafruit/
  6. John Lewis partners with Cimagine – ISRAEL21c, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.israel21c.org/john-lewis-partners-with-cimagine/
  7. London’s £34bn pension fund complicit in Israeli genocide, report says | Middle East Eye, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/londons-ps34bn-pension-fund-complicit-israeli-genocide-report-finds
  8. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
  9. Made in Israel: Agricultural Export From Occupied Territories | PDF – Scribd, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/227845678/Made-In-Israel-Agricultural-Export-From-Occupied-Territories
  10. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/excel?Sector=18&Type=Table
  11. Sample details: Quarter 2 2016 brand name annex – GOV.UK, accessed November 25, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f3294e5274a2e87db4644/pesticide-residues-quarter2-2016-brand-name-annex.pdf
  12. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), 3.5: Hadiklaim – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/13/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-3-5-hadiklaim/
  13. Duchy Organic Medjool Dates | Waitrose & Partners, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.waitrose.com/ecom/products/duchy-organic-medjool-dates/088793-45627-45628
  14. Waitrose Medjool Dates, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.waitrose.com/ecom/products/waitrose-medjool-dates/088809-45641-45642
  15. Hadiklaim in the Jordan Valley, accessed November 25, 2025, https://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/reports/hadiklaim-in-the-jordan-valley/
  16. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), Part 7.3: Waitrose – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/13/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-part-7-3-ms/
  17. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), Endnotes – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/17/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-endnotes/
  18. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), 3.4: Galilee – – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/12/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-3-4-galilee/
  19. APARTHEIDIN THE – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Apartheid-in-the-fields1.pdf
  20. UK: Waitrose rebuffs ethical sourcing criticism – Just Food, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.just-food.com/news/uk-waitrose-rebuffs-ethical-sourcing-criticism/
  21. Waitrose Creates Exclusive Fruit Sourcing Partnership With Primafruit – Perishable News, accessed November 25, 2025, https://perishablenews.com/produce/waitrose-creates-exclusive-fruit-sourcing-partnership-with-primafruit/
  22. About Us – Primafruit, accessed November 25, 2025, https://primafruit.co.uk/index.php?stub=About-Us
  23. CONSOLIDATED – BayWa AG, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.baywa.com/binaries/pdf/content/documents/baywacms-en/downloadcenter/consolidated-financial-statements/consolidated-financial-statements-2017/consolidated-financial-statements-2017/baywacms%3Adownloadpdf/Konzernfinanzbericht_2017_BayWa_e.pdf
  24. income statement – T&G Global, accessed November 25, 2025, https://tandg.global/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/FY-Financial-Summary-2016.pdf
  25. 23: Worldwide Fruit | Article – Fruitnet, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/23-worldwide-fruit/163693.article
  26. from Israel’s illegal settlements to UK supermarkets – – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2020/04/apartheid-in-the-fields-EBOOK.pdf
  27. Sales and profits rise at Fresca Group | News – Fruitnet, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/sales-and-profits-rise-at-fresca-group/269568.article
  28. ‘Illicit’ settler food sold in UK stores | Israel – The Guardian, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jul/06/israelandthepalestinians.supermarkets
  29. Waitrose denies claims over Israeli products | Article – Fruitnet, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/waitrose-denies-claims-over-israeli-products/151292.article
  30. Waitrose Baby New Potatoes, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.waitrose.com/ecom/products/waitrose-baby-new-potatoes/085049-43161-43162
  31. John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust : Corporate Pension in United Kingdom, Europe – Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.swfinstitute.org/profile/5b0255cb4be9a936d448bb54
  32. Chair’s DC Governance Statement, covering 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025 – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/documents/JLP-Annual-DC-Chair-Statement-2025-Signed-Redacted.pdf
  33. Statement of Investment Principles for Defined Contribution Section – John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/documents/1-JLPPT-DC-Section-SIP-September-2024.pdf
  34. John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust (“the Trust”) – Defined Benefit (“DB”) Section, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.mypension.com/media/21uc1r2g/jlppt-db-section-implementation-statement-2024.pdf
  35. John Lewis Partnership: JLAB | L Marks, accessed November 25, 2025, https://lmarks.com/case-study/john-lewis-partnership-jlab/
  36. Company Portfolio — LIP VENTURES · Venture Capital & Business Development, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.lip.lat/portfolio
  37. UK supermarket Waitrose suffers brand damage for promoting Israel | The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 25, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/amena-saleem/uk-supermarket-waitrose-suffers-brand-damage-promoting-israel
  38. A British Supermarket Is Being Accused of Promoting Israeli Food Propaganda, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.vice.com/en/article/a-british-supermarket-is-being-accused-of-promoting-israeli-food-propaganda/
  39. Waitrose Launches Big Own Label Range | PLMA, accessed November 25, 2025, https://plma.com/article/waitrose-launches-big-own-label-range
  40. Full Year Results 2024/25 – John Lewis Partnership Careers, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.jlpjobs.com/blog/full-year-results-2024-25/
  41. Boycott in the Burbs – Real Media – The View From Below, accessed November 25, 2025, https://realmedia.press/boycott-in-the-burbs/
  42. Actions for Palestine – 16/17 March 2024, accessed November 25, 2025, https://palestinecampaign.org/events/actions-for-palestine-16-17-march-2024/

 

Related News & Articles