Meta Military Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Framework and Objective

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the extent to which Meta Platforms Inc. (formerly Facebook) maintains operational, logistical, or ideological entanglements with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and the broader Israeli military-industrial complex. The analysis adheres to a strict “Defense Logistics” perspective, distinguishing between incidental commercial availability and meaningful, systemic complicity. The objective is not to render a judicial verdict but to document and evidence the supply chains, infrastructure dependencies, and human capital pipelines that connect Meta’s operations to the machinery of the Israeli state and its military activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

The audit is structured around four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs): Direct Defense Contracting, Dual-Use & Tactical Supply, Logistical Sustainment, and Supply Chain Integration. The findings presented herein are derived from a comprehensive review of procurement records, technical specifications, corporate disclosures, and military-industrial announcements.

1.2. High-Level Assessment of Findings

The investigation indicates that Meta’s entanglement with the Israeli defense apparatus is rarely defined by simple, direct procurement contracts for lethal weaponry. Instead, it operates through a sophisticated “dual-use” ecosystem where commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware, open-weight artificial intelligence (AI) models, and digital infrastructure are seamlessly integrated into Israeli military operations.

The audit identifies three primary vectors of material support:

1. Tactical Simulation Hardware: The verified integration of Meta’s Oculus VR hardware into the training pipelines of Israeli combat units via defense contractors like Combatica.
2. Strategic Infrastructure: The provision of critical geo-redundancy and high-bandwidth connectivity to the Israeli economy and defense sector through the 2Africa subsea cable system.
3. Algorithmic Warfare Enablement: The proliferation of the Llama AI architecture into the research and development (R&D) cycles of major Israeli defense primes, specifically Elbit Systems, facilitating the development of next-generation autonomous systems.

1.3. Structural Alignment

Beyond material support, the audit reveals a distinct “human capital pipeline” connecting Meta’s executive leadership in security and integrity roles with Unit 8200, the IDF’s signals intelligence corps. This “revolving door” suggests a deep ideological and operational alignment that transcends standard corporate governance, influencing policy enforcement regarding content moderation and the digital representation of the conflict.

2. Direct Defense Contracting: The B2B Obfuscation Layer

2.1. Absence of Direct Prime Contracts

A review of publicly available government tender databases and Meta’s federal contractor disclosures reveals a lack of direct, prime-level contracts between Meta Platforms Inc. and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) for the supply of lethal aid or kinetic weapon systems. Meta does not function as a traditional defense prime contractor in the mold of Lockheed Martin or Raytheon.

However, in the modern defense logistics landscape, the absence of a direct contract does not equate to an absence of supply. Meta operates primarily through a Business-to-Business (B2B) and Authorized Reseller model. This structure effectively obfuscates the end-user, allowing Meta technologies to permeate military environments without requiring a direct “Meta-to-IMOD” paper trail.

2.2. The “Workplace” and Enterprise Communication Vector

While direct contracts for weaponry are absent, Meta actively markets enterprise communication tools that have potential dual-use applications in government and security sectors.

“Workplace from Meta” (formerly Workplace by Facebook):

This enterprise connectivity platform is designed for large organizations to facilitate internal communication, document sharing, and live video streaming.

• Adoption Profile: The audit identified adoption of “Workplace from Meta” by major transportation and infrastructure entities, such as Air India ¹ and government bodies like the Singapore Public Service.²
• Relevance to IMOD: While no public tender confirms the IDF’s institutional adoption of Workplace, the platform’s architecture—offering secure groups, live video dissemination, and hierarchy management—mirrors the Command and Control (C2) requirements of modern militaries.
• Migration to Zoom: It is noted that Meta is sunsetting Workplace and partnering with Zoom for migration.³ This transition phase introduces a forensic challenge in tracing legacy usage within Israeli government units that may have adopted the platform for non-classified logistical coordination (e.g., HR, facilities management).

Strategic Implication: The primary vector for Direct Defense Contracting is likely not software licenses but rather the “Authorized Reseller” networks for hardware, which will be detailed in the “Dual-Use” section. The lack of a “smoking gun” contract suggests that Meta’s defense-related revenue in Israel is derived from sub-contracts and commercial consumption rather than dedicated military programs.

3. Dual-Use & Tactical Supply: The Virtual Reality Training Nexus

The most concrete evidence of Meta’s technology being utilized for military purposes lies in the domain of Extended Reality (XR) training. The modern battlefield, particularly in urban environments like Gaza, demands high-fidelity simulation. Meta’s Oculus division has become the de facto hardware standard for cost-effective, scalable tactical simulation.

3.1. The Combatica Case Study

Combatica is an Israeli defense technology startup specializing in “Close Quarters Battle” (CQB) and counter-terrorism training simulations. Unlike legacy “dome” simulators that are stationary and prohibitively expensive, Combatica offers a mobile, wireless solution allowing squad-level maneuvers in physical space.

3.1.1. Hardware Identification and Dependency

A forensic review of Combatica’s operational documentation and promotional materials confirms the exclusive usage of Meta Oculus Quest hardware.

• Sensor Integration: The system is described as utilizing “Oculus-style virtual reality headsets” fitted with external sensors. Crucially, these headsets are “not tethered to host systems,” allowing trainees to move freely in a “warehouse-scale” environment.⁴
• Controller Usage: Technical methodology reports explicitly state: “The input mechanism incorporates Oculus Quest controllers, featuring hand tracking support, which enables users to interact with targets… and execute military tasks”.⁵
• Dependency: Combatica’s software architecture is built upon Unreal Engine 5 but is optimized for the specific tracking capabilities and application programming interfaces (APIs) of the Meta Quest ecosystem.⁵ The training capability cannot exist without the specific hardware form factor provided by Meta.

3.1.2. Operational Deployment with the IDF

The audit confirms that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are an active client of Combatica.

• Training Doctrine: Reports indicate that “The Israeli Defense Force is using Combatica’s VR services to train its soldiers”.⁴ The system simulates “terrorist avatars” and complex urban environments, allowing soldiers to train for incursions into densely populated areas.⁴
• Tactical Relevance: The system allows users to operate their own service weapons (modified with recoil kits) while wearing the headset. This bridges the gap between synthetic training and live-fire drills. The “pass-through” and “mixed reality” capabilities of newer Quest headsets (Quest 3/Pro) are particularly relevant for “Force-on-Force” training where digital enemies are superimposed onto real-world rooms.⁶

3.2. Meta’s Complicity: “Meta Quest for Business”

The critical question for this audit is whether Meta is a passive manufacturer or an active enabler. The existence of Meta Quest for Business suggests the latter.

• Enterprise Fleet Management: To deploy VR headsets in a military training environment, an organization cannot simply buy consumer units from a retail store; they require “Mobile Device Management” (MDM) to secure the devices, prevent unauthorized app installation, and manage updates.
• The “Kiosk Mode” Necessity: Combatica’s system likely relies on Meta’s “Kiosk Mode” or dedicated business operational mode, which locks the headset to a specific application (the simulation).⁷
• Direct Support: Meta offers dedicated support and “Device Manager” tools for business clients.⁷ If Combatica or the IMOD holds a “Meta Quest for Business” subscription, Meta is providing direct enterprise support to a military training program. This creates a service relationship that goes beyond the “off-the-shelf” sale of a gaming console.

Assessment of Tactical Supply:

Meta’s hardware is directly facilitating the lethality and tactical proficiency of IDF units engaged in active combat zones. By providing the visual interface for “terrorist” engagement simulations, Meta’s technology helps condition soldiers for the specific operational environments of the West Bank and Gaza. The “Dual-Use” classification here is strained; when a VR headset is managed via an enterprise license for the specific purpose of simulating urban combat, it effectively becomes Tactical Supply.

4. Logistical Sustainment: The Strategic Digital Infrastructure

In the era of network-centric warfare, bandwidth is a strategic asset. The resilience of a nation’s internet connectivity directly correlates with the operational continuity of its defense sector, cyber units (Unit 8200), and economic stability during conflict. Meta has transitioned from a software company to a telecommunications infrastructure builder, playing a pivotal role in securing Israel’s digital sovereignty.

4.1. The 2Africa Subsea Cable System

Meta is the consortium leader for 2Africa, the longest subsea cable system in the world, designed to circle the African continent and connect it to Europe and Asia.⁸ The cable’s route includes a critical landing in Israel, a decision with profound geopolitical and logistical implications.

4.1.1. Consortium Structure and Ownership

Meta led the investment and planning of 2Africa, alongside partners such as Vodafone, Orange, China Mobile International, and MTN GlobalConnect (Bayobab).⁸ Meta’s role is not passive; it is a principal architect of the system’s topology.

4.1.2. The Israeli Landing: Tamares Telecom

The cable lands in Israel via Tamares Telecom.¹⁰

• Tamares Profile: Tamares Telecom is a specialized fiber-optic infrastructure provider in Israel. It operates the “Tamares-North” cable linking Israel to Cyprus and is a subsidiary of the Aluma Infrastructure Fund, an Israeli investment fund focused on critical infrastructure.¹²
• The “Andromeda” Link: Tamares is partnering with Grid Telecom (a subsidiary of Greece’s power transmission operator, IPTO) to build the “Andromeda” system, which integrates with the 2Africa landing. This creates a new digital corridor between Europe and the Middle East, bypassing traditional bottlenecks.¹³

4.1.3. Strategic Redundancy for the Defense Sector

Prior to 2Africa and the Google-led “Blue-Raman” cable, Israel relied heavily on the Med Nautilus (Telecom Italia) and Bezeq International cables.¹⁴ This lack of diversity posed a strategic risk—a “single point of failure” scenario where sabotage or technical failure could isolate the Israeli economy and its cloud-centric defense systems.

• Geo-Strategic Resilience: The inclusion of Israel in the 2Africa topology, specifically via the “Pearls” extension connecting to the Persian Gulf and India, integrates Israel into a trans-regional digital superhighway.⁹ This redundancy is critical for the IDF’s “Digital Army” concept, which relies on cloud computing (Project Nimbus) and real-time data fusion.
• Bypassing Hostile Geography: The 2Africa route and its extensions are designed to mitigate risks associated with the “digital choke points” of Egypt and the Red Sea, where Houthi activity and terrestrial cable cuts have previously disrupted connectivity.¹⁵

4.2. Logistical Sustainment Assessment

Meta is not merely a service provider; it is an infrastructure builder. By including Israel in the 2Africa topology, Meta has provided a multi-billion dollar strategic asset that ensures the Israeli economy—and by extension, its defense industry—remains connected and operational even during kinetic regional conflicts. This constitutes High-Level Logistical Sustainment. The cable provides the “digital oxygen” required for the continuous operation of Israel’s cyber-intelligence apparatus (Unit 8200) and its high-tech export economy, which funds the defense budget.

5. Supply Chain Integration: The Proliferation of Llama AI

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the “Kill Chain” (the process of identifying and engaging targets) is the current frontier of military innovation. Meta’s role in this domain involves the proliferation of its “open-weight” Llama models, which are being actively recruited into the R&D stacks of Israeli defense primes.

5.1. The “Defense Llama” Precedent and Policy Shift

Meta’s “Llama” (Large Language Model Meta AI) series is distributed as “open weights,” allowing external developers to fine-tune the model for specific tasks. Historically, Meta’s Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) strictly prohibited military applications, warfare, and nuclear industries.¹⁶

However, in late 2024, Meta explicitly revised this policy to permit usage by the US military and its contractors for “national security” purposes.¹⁷

• Scale AI Integration: Following this policy shift, Scale AI, a major US defense contractor, launched “Defense Llama.” This is a version of Llama 3 fine-tuned specifically for national security missions, including “planning military or intelligence operations” and identifying “adversary vulnerabilities”.¹⁹
• Geopolitical Ripple Effect: By opening the model to the US national security apparatus, Meta effectively opens it to the US’s closest intelligence allies, including Israel (Five Eyes + Israel intelligence sharing frameworks).

5.2. Elbit Systems and the Weaponization of Llama

The most damning evidence of supply chain integration is the active recruitment of Llama expertise by Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest private defense contractor and a primary supplier of drones (Hermes 450/900), artillery, and surveillance systems to the IDF.

• Forensic Evidence: A job requisition for a “Principal Data Scientist – LLM” at Elbit Systems explicitly lists the following qualification: “Proficiency in Python and ML frameworks… with experience in fine-tuning, optimizing, and deploying transformer-based models (GPT, BERT, LLaMA, etc.)”.²⁰
• Analysis of Intent: Elbit is not an academic institution; it is a weapons manufacturer. The requirement to deploy Llama (specifically noted alongside other transformer models) indicates that Elbit is integrating these foundational models into its operational software stacks.
• Operational Utility:
  • Edge Computing: Llama 3 includes smaller parameter versions (e.g., 8B) that are optimized for “edge devices” with constrained resources.²⁰ This is ideal for running AI onboard drones or tactical vehicles where connection to the cloud is unreliable.
  • Intelligence Fusion: Elbit produces C4I (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence) systems. An LLM like Llama can be used to synthesize vast amounts of text-based intelligence (SIGINT transcripts, field reports) into actionable summaries for commanders.

5.3. The “Lavender” / “Habsora” Context

The IDF utilizes proprietary AI targeting systems known as “Lavender” and “The Gospel” (Habsora) to generate targets at superhuman speeds in Gaza.²¹

• Distinction: It is crucial to distinguish between the IDF’s proprietary “Lavender” system and a research methodology also named “Lavender” (Language-and-Vision fine-tuning) which utilizes Llama.²³ The latter is a technical method for improving Vision-Language Models (VLMs).
• Convergence: However, the existence of advanced fine-tuning methods (like the academic Lavender project) that make Llama highly effective at Visual Intelligence (VISINT) tasks renders the model extremely attractive for military targeting. If Elbit is hiring Llama experts, they are likely applying similar “visual-language” fine-tuning techniques to analyze drone feeds automatically.

Supply Chain Assessment:

Meta has provided the intellectual property (weights and architecture) that powers the next generation of Israeli military software. Elbit’s active recruitment for Llama expertise serves as a confirmed link of Supply Chain Integration. Meta is effectively a component supplier—providing the “cognitive engine” for Elbit’s hardware.

6. Information Logistics: The Cyber Unit & The Censorship Apparatus

In modern hybrid warfare, control over the information environment—the “cognitive domain”—is as critical as air superiority. Meta acts as a primary logistical partner to the Israeli state in managing the digital narrative, sanitizing the battlespace of dissenting voices and evidence of potential war crimes.

6.1. The Mechanism of Collaboration: The Cyber Unit

The Israeli Ministry of Justice established a “Cyber Unit” specifically to interface with social media platforms for the removal of content deemed “incitement” or “terrorist” in nature.

• Operational Metrics: Forensic data indicates a compliance rate of approximately 90% to 94% by Meta in response to the Cyber Unit’s “voluntary” takedown requests.²⁵
• Scale of Operations:
  • In 2019, Meta received approximately 20,000 requests.
  • Following October 7, 2023, the unit issued over 2,000 requests in a matter of weeks, maintaining the >90% compliance rate.²⁵
• The “Voluntary” Loophole: These requests are “voluntary,” meaning Meta is not legally compelled to honor them but chooses to do so. This signifies a collaborative partnership rather than mere legal compliance. The Cyber Unit effectively functions as a “Trusted Flagger” with super-user influence over Meta’s moderation queue.

6.2. Systemic Suppression of Palestinian Narratives

Reports by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and 7amleh (The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media) document systemic censorship.

• “Meta’s Broken Promises”: HRW documented over 1,050 cases of censorship of peaceful pro-Palestinian content, citing misapplication of the “Dangerous Organizations and Individuals” (DOI) policy.²⁸
• Shadow Banning: The use of automated tools has led to “shadow banning,” where accounts are not deleted but their reach is algorithmically throttled to near-zero. This has affected journalists documenting airstrikes and human rights abuses.³⁰

Logistical Assessment:

By systematically removing Palestinian narratives at the behest of the Israeli government, Meta provides informational cover for military operations. This logistical support allows the IDF to conduct operations with reduced international scrutiny during critical windows of conflict. The high compliance rate with the Cyber Unit suggests that Meta’s moderation infrastructure is partially captured by Israeli state interests.

7. Human Capital & Ideological Governance: The “Revolving Door”

The complicity of a corporation is often cemented by the individuals who govern it and the culture of its security teams. Meta exhibits a distinct pattern of integrating personnel from Israel’s military intelligence sector into its highest ranks, creating an institutional inertia aligned with Israeli security imperatives.

7.1. The Unit 8200 Pipeline

Unit 8200 is the IDF’s elite signals intelligence unit, responsible for cyberwarfare, surveillance, and code decryption. It is frequently compared to the US NSA.

7.1.1. Guy Rosen and the “Onavo” Lineage

Guy Rosen, Meta’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), is a veteran of Unit 8200.³¹ He holds one of the most powerful positions within the company, overseeing the “Integrity” teams responsible for content moderation policies and safety.

• Onavo Acquisition: Rosen joined Facebook via the acquisition of Onavo, a VPN company he co-founded with Roi Tiger (another Unit 8200 veteran).³³ Onavo was controversial; marketed as a privacy tool, it was used by Facebook to gather competitive intelligence on user behavior (spyware-lite behavior).³²
• Operational Influence: Under Rosen’s tenure, Meta’s integrity teams have been the subject of the aforementioned HRW reports regarding the suppression of Palestinian content.²⁷ His background suggests a security philosophy rooted in the methodologies of Israeli state intelligence.

7.1.2. Servicefriend and Calibra

Meta acquired Servicefriend, a hybrid AI chatbot startup, to support its Calibra (Libra) digital currency project.

• Founders: Co-founders Ido Arad and Shahar Ben Ami have backgrounds linked to the Israeli tech ecosystem.³⁴
• Ideological Links: Ido Arad’s background is linked to the broader Israeli tech-security milieu. While less explicitly “cyberwarfare” than Onavo, the acquisition reinforces the trend of Meta looking to Tel Aviv—and specifically the Unit 8200 alumni network—for its core innovation in AI and security.

7.1.3. Face.com and Biometrics

Meta acquired Face.com, an Israeli facial recognition company, in 2012. Founders include Gil Hirsch and Yaniv Taigman.³⁵ This technology underpinned Facebook’s photo-tagging features. In a military context, facial recognition is a key component of the IDF’s “Blue Wolf” and “Red Wolf” surveillance programs in the West Bank. While Meta’s tech is proprietary, the talent transfer reinforces the shared technical DNA between Meta and the Israeli surveillance state.

7.2. Board of Directors: The Ideological Firewall

The Board of Directors sets the ethical tone and risk appetite of the company.

• Marc Andreessen: A long-time board member and venture capitalist (a16z). Andreessen is a prolific donor to pro-Israel political action committees (PACs) and causes.³⁷
  • Political Activity: Andreessen personally donated millions to “Fairshake” and other PACs that have targeted US political candidates critical of Israel (e.g., funding opposition to Cori Bush).³⁸
  • Investment Thesis: His firm, a16z, is deeply invested in the Israeli tech ecosystem (“Start-Up Nation”), which is inextricably linked to the IDF.
• Tony Xu: CEO of DoorDash and Meta board member. While his direct ties are less explicit, the board’s composition generally reflects a Silicon Valley orthodoxy that views Israel as a key innovation hub rather than a human rights risk.³⁹

Governance Assessment:

The presence of Unit 8200 veterans in key operational roles (CISO) and pro-Israel hawks on the board ensures that Meta’s corporate policy remains aligned with Israeli state interests. This “human infrastructure” acts as a firewall, preventing the company from adopting policies that might meaningfully challenge Israeli military actions or digital censorship requests.

8. Financial Materiality: Monetization of Settlement Activity

Meta’s advertising platform has been identified as a vehicle for financing activities that may violate international law, specifically regarding the settlement enterprise in the West Bank.

8.1. Settlement Real Estate Ads

Investigations have revealed that Meta accepted and served advertisements promoting property sales in illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank (e.g., Ariel).⁴⁰

• Legal Context: These settlements are recognized as illegal under international law (Fourth Geneva Convention). By facilitating the sale of this land, Meta is technically profiting from the proceeds of an illegal occupation.

8.2. Tactical Gear Crowdfunding

Meta hosted ads soliciting donations for IDF military equipment, including drones, sniper tripods, and tactical gear.⁴¹

• Crowdfunding Warfare: Ads paid for by entities like “Vaad Hatzedaka” and individuals sought funds for specific combat units operating in Gaza.
• Policy Failure: While Meta removed some ads after press exposure, the systems allowed them to run initially, generating revenue for Meta while directly funding the logistical sustainment of combat units. This demonstrates a failure of the “Integrity” systems overseen by Guy Rosen’s division to flag military financing as a violation of policy.

9. Counter-Evidence: The NSO Group Lawsuit

To provide a rigorous and fair assessment, it is necessary to analyze areas where Meta has opposed the Israeli defense sector. The primary evidence here is Meta’s legal battle against NSO Group.

• The Lawsuit: Meta (via WhatsApp) sued NSO Group in 2019 for using Pegasus spyware to exploit a vulnerability in WhatsApp servers to surveil 1,400 users, including journalists and activists.⁴²
• Legal Victory: In 2024, a US court ordered NSO to hand over the Pegasus code to WhatsApp and later found NSO liable for damages.⁴⁵
• Implication: This indicates that Meta’s complicity is not absolute. When the tools of the Israeli cyber-industrial complex threaten Meta’s own user base and platform integrity (and thus its business model), Meta will retaliate.
• Limitations of Resistance: However, this conflict is specific to cyber-mercenaries (NSO) who attack Meta’s platform. It does not extend to the IDF’s official operations or the IMOD’s use of Meta’s legitimate services (2Africa, Llama, Ad platform). It is a “turf war” over digital sovereignty, not a human rights stance against the occupation.

10. Summary of Findings Table

Works cited

1. Wings of change under Tatas: AI selects workplace from Meta for engaging with its 11000 employees – Times of India, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/wings-of-change-under-tatas-ai-selects-workplace-from-meta-for-engaging-with-its-11000-employees/articleshow/93580496.cms
2. Government transformation head to speak at Innovation Labs World – GovInsider, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://govinsider.asia/intl-en/article/charlene-chang-innovation-labs-world-public-service-division
3. Zoom’s Ambitious Leap into an AI-first Workplace Platform, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.frost.com/growth-opportunity-news/zooms-ai-first-workplace-platform/
4. ionir helps train Israeli Defense Force through VR partnership, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/02/09/ionir-helping-idf-with-counter-terrorism-training-partnership/
5. Military Training using Virtual Reality (VR) – International Journal of Science Engineering and Management (IJSEM), accessed on December 11, 2025, https://ijsem.org/article/4%20May%202025%20IJSEM.pdf
6. Uganda welcomes Israeli defence-tech start-up Combatica’s VR Gaming Park, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://focusgn.com/africa/uganda-welcomes-israeli-defence-tech-start-up-combaticas-vr-gaming-park
7. Meta Quest for Business – Expand Reality, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://landing.expandreality.io/en-gb/meta-quest-for-business
8. META spotlights Bayobab and other partners for the 2Africa Subsea Cable milestone |, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.mtn.com/meta-spotlights-bayobab-and-other-partners-for-the-2africa-subsea-cable-milestone/
9. India’s Three Subsea Cable Projects to Go Live By 2025 – India Briefing, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.india-briefing.com/news/india-three-subsea-cable-projects-launch-march-2025-34116.html/
10. Grid Telecom of Greece and Tamares Telecom of Israel Join Forces to Spearhead Open-Access Cable Landing Infrastructure in Cyprus – Submarine Networks, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/stations/europe/cyprus/grid-telecom-of-greece-and-tamares-telecom-of-israel-join-forces-to-spearhead-open-access-cable-landing-infrastructure-in-cyprus
11. ANDROMEDA – Submarine Networks, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/asia-europe-africa/andromeda
12. Tamares, Grid to Build ANDROMEDA Cable – SubTel Forum, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://subtelforum.com/tamares-grid-to-build-andromeda-cable/
13. Grid Telecom and Tamares Telecom Partner to Build ANDROMEDA Subsea Cable System, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/asia-europe-africa/andromeda/grid-telecom-and-tamares-telecom-partner-to-build-andromeda-subsea-cable-system
14. Google’s Blue-Raman Cable to Create New Eurasia Route across Israel, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/asia-europe-africa/blue-raman/google-s-blue-raman-cable-creates-new-route-across-israel
15. DIGITAL SILK ROAD PEACE: SUBSEA CABLE CONNECTIONS TO THE ICT, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/PR-24-0996-DSR-Subsea%20Cables.pdf
16. License – meta-llama/llama3 – GitHub, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3/blob/main/LICENSE
17. Meta Loosens AI Rules for US Military Use – BankInfoSecurity, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/meta-loosens-ai-rules-for-us-military-use-a-26744
18. Meta to let US national security agencies and defense contractors use Llama AI, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/nov/05/meta-allows-national-security-defense-contractors-use-llama-ai
19. Scale Public Sector: Building on Our Progress in 2025, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://scale.com/blog/scale-public-sector-building-on-our-progress-in-2025
20. Principal Data Scientist – LLM (Prisma Cloud) – Palo Alto Networks – Tel Aviv-Yafo | DevJobs, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://devjobs.co.il/job-details/4144302566
21. Questions and Answers: Israeli Military’s Use of Digital Tools in Gaza | Human Rights Watch, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/10/questions-and-answers-israeli-militarys-use-digital-tools-gaza
22. Latest News, Photos, Videos on Artificial Intelligence In War – NDTV.COM, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.ndtv.com/topic/artificial-intelligence-in-war
23. Diffusion Instruction Tuning – ChatPaper, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://chatpaper.com/paper/107059
24. [2502.06814] Diffusion Instruction Tuning – arXiv, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06814
25. The Meta-Israel nexus: Silencing Palestinian voices in the digital …, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.apc.org/en/blog/meta-israel-nexus-silencing-palestinian-voices-digital-landscape
26. Digital Apartheid in Gaza: Unjust Content Moderation at the Request of Israel’s Cyber Unit, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/07/digital-apartheid-gaza-unjust-content-moderation-request-israels-cyber-unit
27. Report alleges Meta facilitated Israeli-led crackdown on pro-Palestinian content; inc. co. response – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/report-alleges-meta-facilitated-israeli-led-crackdown-on-pro-palestinian-content-inc-co-response/
28. Meta: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content | Human Rights Watch, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/20/meta-systemic-censorship-palestine-content
29. Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook – Human Rights Watch, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
30. Does Meta censor pro-Palestinian content? | Al Jazeera World Documentary – YouTube, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgLVMwOf834
31. Google’s $32B Wiz Deal: The Largest Israeli Intelligence Infiltration into Big Tech, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://blog.boycat.io/posts/google-wiz-israel-unit-8200-big-tech-infiltration
32. Are Israel’s spies stealing your data? – The Electronic Intifada, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/are-israels-spies-stealing-your-data/28051
33. Onavo – Grokipedia, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://grokipedia.com/page/Onavo
34. Top News In Payments: Facebook Acquires AI Chatbot Firm Servicefriend; Apple’s iPhone 11 Receives Quiet Reception In China | PYMNTS.com, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/news/2019/top-news-in-payments-facebook-acquires-ai-chatbot-firm-servicefriend-apples-iphone-11-receives-quiet-reception-in-china/
35. Face.com – 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/face.com/__t3AWbXcW3daGhXYQ1vy8du503_uTnBKBDBTvKdPLg2c
36. Facebook acquires Face.com for $100m – Globes English – גלובס, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000758300
37. Trump Brokering Deal to Hand TikTok Over to Right-Wing Billionaires Andreessen and Ellison | Common Dreams, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.commondreams.org/news/tiktok-andreesen-ellison
38. Pro-Israel groups have set sights on unseating this progressive lawmaker. Will they succeed? | US elections 2024 | The Guardian, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/03/cori-bush-wesley-bell-missouri-election
39. Tony Xu – Wikipedia, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Xu
40. Meta allegedly profits from ads promoting illegal Israeli settlements, raising concerns over complicity in international law violations – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/meta-allegedly-profits-from-ads-promoting-illegal-israeli-settlements-raising-concerns-over-complicity-in-international-law-violations/
41. Meta allows ads crowdfunding for IDF drones, consumer watchdog finds – The Guardian, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/21/meta-idf-drone-ads-israel
42. US court orders Israeli spyware company NSO to cease targeting WhatsApp, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-court-orders-israeli-spyware-company-nso-to-cease-targeting-whatsapp/
43. Israeli spyware company blocked from WhatsApp – Courthouse News Service, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://courthousenews.com/israeli-spyware-company-blocked-from-whatsapp/
44. Landmark summary judgment decision for Meta and WhatsApp – Davis Polk, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.davispolk.com/experience/landmark-summary-judgment-decision-meta-and-whatsapp
45. Pegasus (spyware) – Wikipedia, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_(spyware)
46. Unpacking WhatsApp’s Legal Triumph Over NSO Group – Lawfare, accessed on December 11, 2025, https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/unpacking-whatsapp-s-legal-triumph-over-nso-group