Nike Military Audit

1. Executive Summary

This comprehensive forensic audit evaluates the operational, logistical, and financial entanglements of Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE) within the State of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The mandate of this assessment is to determine the degree of “Military Complicity” by rigorously distinguishing between direct material support for state violence and incidental commercial association. The analysis integrates data regarding direct defense contracting, the supply of dual-use tactical gear, supply chain integration with defense entities, and the operation of retail infrastructure within illegal settlement blocs.

The investigation reveals that while Nike Inc. does not function as a primary defense contractor supplying lethal aid to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the corporation exhibits a High Level of Structural Complicity. This assessment is driven not by the direct sale of weaponry, but by the company’s deep integration into the settlement economy through its exclusive strategic partners and supply chain dependencies.

Key Findings:

1. Direct Defense Contracting (Null Finding): There is no evidence of direct contractual relationships between Nike Inc. and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) for the development or sale of kinetic systems. The major defense contracts identified in the intelligence packet (e.g., Iron Dome, drone swarms) are held by indigenous defense primes such as Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Elbit Systems, and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI).¹ Nike remains a consumer goods entity, not a defense prime.
2. Structural Complicity via Strategic Partnership (High Risk): Nike’s operations in Israel are executed through a “Master Franchisee” model, granting exclusive rights to Retailors Ltd, a subsidiary of the Fox Group (Fox-Wizel Ltd). This partner is a pivotal economic actor in the settlement enterprise, operating Nike and Foot Locker storefronts in illegal settlements including Ma’ale Adumim, Ariel, and Gush Etzion. By consolidating its market presence under this specific conglomerate in 2021—a move often mischaracterized as a boycott—Nike effectively deepened its reliance on an entity with extensive settlement infrastructure.⁴
3. Manufacturing Supply Chain Integration (High Risk): Nike maintains a critical, long-term procurement relationship with Delta Galil Industries, an Israeli textile giant. Delta Galil operates logistics and warehousing facilities in the Barkan Industrial Zone, a settlement industrial park in the West Bank. This constitutes a direct upstream link to the settlement economy, where Nike capital contributes to the viability of industrial zones built on occupied land.⁶
4. Dual-Use & Logistical Sustainment (Moderate Risk): Nike produces “mil-spec” footwear (Special Field Boots – SFB) which are AR 670-1 compliant for the US military. While there is no evidence of a central IDF tender for these boots, they are widely widely available for private purchase by IDF personnel through third-party tactical retailers in Israel. Furthermore, Nike’s franchisee actively integrates into the IDF’s logistical support network by offering institutional discounts to the “Hever” consumer club (for career soldiers) and “Kranot HaShotrim” (for police), thereby subsidizing the quality of life for security personnel.⁸
5. Greenwashing & Energy Politics: Evidence suggests Nike purchases Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) from Israeli sources to offset its carbon footprint. In the context of the Israeli energy market, this often implicates projects in the occupied Golan Heights or the Negev, raising concerns of “greenwashing colonization” where environmental credits are generated via land appropriation.⁶

2. Methodology and Definitions

To ensure a rigorous and fair assessment, this audit adheres to a strict forensic framework. We distinguish between “Incidental Association” (e.g., a soldier buying a pair of sneakers as a private citizen) and “Material Complicity” (e.g., corporate structures that systematically support the occupation).

2.1 The Complicity Spectrum

This report positions Nike Inc. primarily within Tier 3 (Structural/Economic) with elements of Tier 2 (Operational) via its franchisee’s logistical integration with security forces.

3. Direct Defense Contracting Analysis

The first Core Intelligence Requirement demands an investigation into direct contracts with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD). A thorough review of the provided intelligence and open-source defense directories indicates a complete absence of Nike Inc. from the lethal aid supply chain.

3.1 The Landscape of IMOD Procurement

The Israeli defense procurement ecosystem is dominated by three state-owned or state-affiliated giants: Rafael, Elbit Systems, and IAI.

• Rafael Advanced Defense Systems is the prime contractor for the Iron Dome and David’s Sling air defense systems. Recent contracts involve multi-billion dollar allocations from US aid packages for interceptor production.¹
• Elbit Systems specializes in unmanned aerial systems (UAS), cyber warfare, and land warfare systems. Snippets confirm recent IMOD purchases of “advanced drones and autonomous systems” worth approximately $40 million.³
• Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is heavily involved in missile defense (Arrow system) and maritime surveillance.¹

3.2 Nike’s Absence from the Kinetic Chain

There is no evidence within the forensic dataset ¹ to suggest that Nike Inc. has bid for, won, or executed contracts for the development of weaponry, ballistics, or combat platforms. Nike does not appear in SIBAT directories (the International Defense Cooperation Directorate of the IMOD) as a defense exporter or importer.

The “Nike” brand is inextricably linked to consumer athletics. While modern warfare increasingly utilizes commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology—such as drones or tablets—footwear remains a category where military-specific specifications (“mil-spec”) act as a barrier to entry for purely civilian brands. As analyzed in Section 5, Nike has crossed this barrier with its SFB line, but acts as a component supplier to the individual soldier rather than a prime contractor to the state.

Conclusion on Requirement 1: Nike Inc. creates no direct military complicity via lethal contracting. The corporation’s liability lies entirely in the dual-use and economic spheres.

4. Forensic Architecture: The Corporate Proxy Interface

To understand Nike’s complicity, one must deconstruct the corporate architecture that governs its presence in the region. Nike Inc. (Oregon) does not operate directly in Israel; it operates through a Master Franchisee model. This structure creates a “plausible deniability” buffer for the parent company while ensuring it profits from every sector of the market, including illegal settlements.

4.1 The 2021 Strategic Consolidation (The “Boycott” Myth)

In October 2021, a significant disinformation event occurred wherein various media outlets and activists claimed Nike was “boycotting” Israel.¹³ A forensic review of the correspondence sent to Israeli retailers reveals the true nature of this event, which was a strategic corporate consolidation rather than a political statement.

• The Correspondence: Nike informed independent store owners that their business relationship “no longer matches the company’s policy and goals”.⁴ This language, while abrupt, is standard corporate phrasing used during channel restructuring.
• The Strategy: This move aligned with Nike’s global “Consumer Direct Acceleration” strategy, which sought to eliminate small-volume wholesale partners (who dilute brand prestige and margin) in favor of a “premium” experience controlled either directly by Nike digital channels or through a single “strategic partner”.¹⁵
• The Outcome: Far from leaving the Israeli market, Nike strengthened its monopoly by handing exclusive distribution rights to Retailors Ltd, a subsidiary of the Fox Group.⁵

Implication for Complicity:

The 2021 shift effectively purged small, independent Israeli businesses—some of whom may have been apolitical or located in non-settlement areas—and concentrated Nike’s entire market footprint into the hands of a single conglomerate, Fox Group. As detailed below, Fox Group is an entity with deep, explicit ties to the settlement enterprise. By selecting Fox as its exclusive proxy, Nike Inc. made a calculated decision to tie its brand destiny to a settlement-complicit actor.

4.2 The Strategic Partner: Retailors Ltd. and Fox Group

The primary vehicle for Nike’s operations in Israel is Retailors Ltd (TLV: RTLS), a subsidiary of the Fox Group (Fox-Wizel Ltd). The complicity of Nike is inextricably linked to the operations of this partner.

4.2.1 Corporate Profile: Harel Wiesel

The Fox Group is led by CEO Harel Wiesel, a dominant figure in the Israeli economy with significant political leverage.

• Political Influence: Wiesel has demonstrated the ability to sway government policy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he led a coalition of big businesses to secure billions in state aid while simultaneously distributing millions in dividends—a move described by critics as “swinish capitalism”.¹⁸
• Wartime Mobilization: Following October 7, Wiesel was active in organizing business forums regarding the war effort.²⁰ While he has at times criticized the government regarding judicial reform (framing it as an economic risk), his business empire functions as a pillar of the status quo.²¹
• No “Purple Fox” Link: It is crucial to note that while a “Purple Fox Foundation” exists and supports elite IDF units like Sayeret Givati ²², there is no evidence in the dataset linking this foundation to the Fox Group clothing retailer. They appear to be distinct entities sharing a common animal motif. This audit does not attribute the Purple Fox Foundation’s direct military aid to Nike’s partner based on current data.

4.2.2 The Settlement Footprint

Fox Group does not merely sell clothes; it anchors the commercial viability of illegal settlements. The group operates stores in key settlement blocs, normalizing their existence and generating tax revenue for their municipal councils.

Table 1: Fox Group / Retailors Ltd Settlement Operations

Forensic Insight:

Snippet 5 explicitly states: “The Group operates a Footlocker store in Ofer Adumim Mall in Ma’ale Adumim settlement.” Since Foot Locker is the primary retailer for Nike sneakers (outside of Nike-branded stores), and both are managed by Retailors Ltd, the Nike supply chain extends directly into the settlement consumer market. This is Tier 3 Complicity: The Nike brand is a tenant in a mall built on occupied land, paying rent to settlement developers and taxes to settlement municipalities.

5. Supply Chain Forensic Audit: The Manufacturing Nexus

While retail complicity is visible, upstream manufacturing complicity is structural and often opaque. The audit identifies Delta Galil Industries as the critical node connecting Nike to the settlement industrial complex.

5.1 Delta Galil Industries: The Strategic Supplier

Delta Galil Industries (TLV: DELG) is a global textile giant specializing in seamless intimate apparel, socks, and activewear. It is not a transactional vendor but a strategic partner to Nike.

• Innovation Hub: Delta Galil operates a “strategic development center for socks” specifically for Nike in Oregon.²⁴ This indicates a co-dependent relationship where Delta Galil is integrated into Nike’s R&D pipeline.
• Supplier Status: Delta Galil is listed as one of Nike’s “Key Suppliers” alongside Asian manufacturing giants like Pou Chen and Fulgent Sun.²⁴

5.2 Geographic Complicity: The Barkan Industrial Zone

The most damning evidence of upstream complicity is Delta Galil’s presence in the Barkan Industrial Zone.

• Location: Barkan is a large settlement industrial park located deep within the West Bank, near the settlement of Ariel.
• Operational Evidence: Multiple independent audits and intelligence snippets confirm that Delta Galil has operated a warehouse and logistics facility in Barkan.⁶
• Complicity Mechanism: Companies operate in Barkan to benefit from subsidized rents, lax environmental regulations, and tax breaks offered by the Israeli government to encourage settlement expansion. By utilizing Delta Galil as a primary supplier, Nike is effectively subsidizing the Barkan facility. Revenue from Nike contracts contributes to Delta Galil’s overall solvency and ability to maintain its settlement footprint.

5.3 The “Greenwashing” of Occupation

Intelligence ⁶ highlights a subtle form of complicity involving Nike’s environmental commitments. The report notes that Nike purchases Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) from Israel to offset its carbon emissions.

• The Issue: Israel’s renewable energy sector is heavily intertwined with land appropriation in the occupied Golan Heights (wind farms) and the Negev (solar farms affecting Bedouin lands).
• Implication: By purchasing Israeli RECs without strict geographic exclusions, Nike may be financially incentivizing “green energy” projects that are built on confiscated land, a phenomenon described as “Greenwashing Colonization.” This allows the company to meet global ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals while funding infrastructure in occupied territories.

6. Product Analysis: Dual-Use and Tactical Supply

The audit now addresses the Core Intelligence Requirement regarding “Dual-Use & Tactical Supply.” This involves determining if Nike produces goods that are “ruggedized” or “mil-spec” and if these goods reach the IDF.

6.1 The Special Field Boot (SFB)

Nike entered the tactical market with the Special Field Boot (SFB), a product line designed by their “Innovation Kitchen” to bring athletic shoe technology to military boots.

• Technical Specifications: The SFB is a “purpose-built” military item. It features:
  • AR 670-1 Compliance: The boots meet the strict uniform regulations of the United States Army (specifically the Coyote Brown colorway and material construction).²⁵
  • Tactical Features: Puncture-resistant internal rock shields, fast-roping guards, and aggressive traction outsoles for varied terrain.²⁶
• US vs. IDF Procurement:
  • US Context: The boot is authorized for wear by US troops and is widely sold through US military exchanges (PX).
  • IDF Context: The IDF generally issues standard boots manufactured by companies like Noga Einat or US aid-funded suppliers like McRae. However, there is a strong culture of “private purchase” within the IDF. Elite units (Sayeret) and reservists often have latitude to purchase their own footwear, provided it meets certain aesthetic and functional criteria.

6.2 Market Availability and “Combat Footwear”

The intelligence confirms that Nike SFB boots are commercially available in Israel through third-party tactical retailers such as “Combat Footwear”.⁸

• Mechanism: An IDF soldier, dissatisfied with standard-issue heavy leather boots, can visit a tactical store or website and purchase Nike SFB boots for personal use.
• Assessment: There is no evidence of a direct “Foreign Military Sale” (FMS) contract where Nike supplies the IDF institutionally. The presence of these boots on IDF soldiers is a result of commercial availability and individual soldier preference.
• Complicity Rating: Tier 2 (Operational/Dual-Use) – Incidental. While Nike does not direct these sales to the IDF, the availability of high-performance combat gear in the Israeli market enhances the operational capability of the individual soldier.

6.3 Disinformation Alert: The “Flag Shoe”

A viral video circulating on social media purported to show Nike Air Force 1s customized with the Israeli flag and Star of David, sparking calls for a boycott.²⁸

• Forensic Verification: The audit confirms this video featured a sticker saying “PNT by Ray,” a custom artist. Nike confirmed to independent fact-checkers that this was not an official product and they do not offer political symbols in their customization suite.¹²
• Conclusion: This specific incident is disinformation and should be disregarded in the complicity assessment.

7. Logistical Sustainment and Institutional Integration

A subtle but pervasive form of complicity is the integration of a brand into the benefits systems of the state security apparatus. This creates a “closed loop” where military service is rewarded with economic privileges, including access to global brands.

7.1 The “Hever” Consumer Club

“Hever” (Hebrew for “Friend”) is a consumer club exclusively for serving IDF personnel, veterans, permanent force personnel (career officers), and their families. It is a powerful economic entity that leverages the purchasing power of the security forces to secure massive discounts.

• Nike’s Integration: Retail listings and discount databases ¹⁰ confirm that Foot Locker Israel (operated by Fox Group/Retailors) and other sports fashion chains like Dream Sport offer institutional discounts to “Hever” members.
• Mechanism: When an IDF career officer purchases Nike running shoes using their Hever card, they receive a subsidized price. This benefit is a direct perk of their military service, designed to retain personnel and improve their quality of life.
• Logistical Sustainment: By participating in the Hever network, Nike’s Israeli proxy is actively supporting the economic welfare of the military class. This acts as a form of soft logistical sustainment.

7.2 “Kranot HaShotrim” (Police Funds)

Similar to Hever, the “Kranot HaShotrim” fund serves the Israel Police.

• Evidence: Foot Locker Israel is listed as accepting these benefits.³¹
• Context: The Israel Police, particularly the Border Police (Magav), play a central role in the enforcement of occupation policies in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Providing institutional benefits to this group links the brand to the enforcement arm of the occupation.

8. Financial Flows and Economic Sustenance

The flow of capital is the ultimate arbiter of complicity. In the case of Nike and its partners, the financial streams are bidirectional and serve to strengthen the settlement enterprise.

8.1 Taxation and Municipal Revenue

When Retailors Ltd operates a Nike store in the Ma’ale Adumim Mall:

1. Rent: Rent is paid to the mall ownership (often settlement development companies).
2. Municipal Tax (Arnona): Business taxes are paid to the Ma’ale Adumim Municipality.
3. Result: This revenue stream directly funds the infrastructure (roads, lighting, security) that makes the settlement viable and allows it to expand.

8.2 Royalty Repatriation

While Nike Inc. (Oregon) does not pay the taxes directly, it receives royalties and wholesale revenue from every shoe sold in that store.

• The Chain: Consumer (Settler) -> Retailors Ltd (Fox) -> Nike Inc.
• Implication: Nike Inc. effectively extracts profit from the economic activity generated on occupied land. This creates a financial incentive for the brand to maintain the status quo rather than enforce a “Green Line” policy (selling only within pre-1967 borders).

9. Comparative Complicity Assessment

To provide the Defense Logistics Oversight Committee with a calibrated view, we compare Nike’s complicity against other corporate actors in the region based on the provided intelligence. This helps distinguish between “Meaningful Complicity” and “Incidental Association.”

Table 2: Comparative Complicity Matrix

Analysis:

Nike ranks lower than Elbit or Rafael because it does not sell lethal aid. However, it ranks higher than many other consumer brands because of its dual-dependency:

1. Upstream: Reliance on Delta Galil (Settlement Manufacturer).
2. Downstream: Reliance on Fox Group (Settlement Retailer).

Most brands might have one or the other; Nike has both, creating a robust web of integration into the occupation economy.

10. Conclusion and Final Risk Rating

Audit Outcome:

The forensic audit finds Substantial Structural Complicity on the part of Nike Inc. regarding the Israeli occupation and settlement enterprise. While the corporation avoids the stigma of being a “merchant of death” by not selling weaponry, it has fully embedded itself into the commercial infrastructure of the occupation.

Primary Drivers of Complicity:

1. Manufacturing Nexus: The procurement relationship with Delta Galil Industries is the most critical link. By sourcing high-tech textiles from a company with facilities in the Barkan Industrial Zone, Nike is commercially integrated into the settlement industrial complex.
2. Retail Architecture: The exclusive franchising agreement with Retailors Ltd (Fox Group) entrenches Nike in the settlement economy. Retailors Ltd operates stores in illegal settlements (Ma’ale Adumim, Ariel), ensuring that the Nike brand generates tax revenue for settlement municipalities.
3. Institutional Integration: Through “Hever” and “Kranot HaShotrim” discounts, Nike products are institutionally subsidized for IDF and Police personnel, weaving the brand into the logistical sustainment of the security forces.

Mitigating Factors:

• There is no evidence of direct weapon sales or IMOD contracts.
• The “SFB” tactical boot supply appears to be commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) rather than a direct government tender.
• The 2021 restructuring was a global business strategy, not a political endorsement, though it had the side effect of deepening reliance on a settlement-active partner.

Final Risk Rating: TIER 3 (Structural/Economic Support)

Definition: The entity does not engage in direct lethal supply but maintains deep, structural economic ties that sustain the viability of the settlement enterprise and the logistical welfare of security forces.

Actionable Recommendations for the Analyst:

• Monitor Contract Status: Track the procurement volume between Nike and Delta Galil. A shift of production away from Delta Galil’s Israeli/West Bank facilities would significantly lower the upstream complicity score.
• Retail Tracking: Monitor the footprint of Retailors Ltd. Expansion of Nike-branded stores into new settlement malls would signal increased downstream complicity.
• Distinction Protocol: In future reporting, maintain a clear distinction between Nike Inc. (US) and Retailors Ltd (Israel), as the latter is the primary engine of settlement activity, though the former retains ultimate brand authority.

Works cited

1. Israel MOD signs multi-billion dollar contract with Rafael to expand serial production of Iron Dome System – EDR Magazine, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/israel-mod-signs-multi-billion-dollar-contract-with-rafael-to-expand-serial-production-of-iron-dome-system
2. Israel MOD Signs Multi-Billion Dollar Contract with Rafael to Expand Serial Production of Iron Dome System – משרד הביטחון, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://mod.gov.il/en/press-releases/press-room/israel-mod-signs-multi-billion-dollar-contract-with-rafael-to-expand-serial-production-of-iron-dome-system
3. Ministry of Defense – Israel MOD Purchases Advanced Drones and Autonomous Systems from Elbit Systems for Approximately $40M – משרד הביטחון, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://mod.gov.il/en/press-releases/press-room/israel-mod-purchases-advanced-drones-and-autonomous-systems-from-elbit-systems-for-approximately-40m
4. Nike to terminate sales in Israeli stores | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/nike-to-terminate-sales-in-israeli-stores-680993
5. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group) – Who Profits, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7377?fox-wizel-ltd-fox-group-
6. Fashion’s Hidden Ties to Illegal Occupation | COSH!, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://cosh.eco/en/articles/how-fashion-supports-illegal-occupation-and-genocide
7. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Delta Galil Industries – Who Profits, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3655?delta-galil-industries
8. NIKE Military & Tactical Boots – CombatFootwear.com, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.combatfootwear.com/collections/nike
9. דף בית | מבצעים והטבות משתלמות | חנות החוויות של Cal, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.cal-store.co.il/
10. Women’s Shoes (Yours Club, Hever Keva, Your Club For Pensioner) – Best in Alm Tel Aviv, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Women’s-Shoes?c2=31432&c3=31348®ion=25159556&c4=31433
11. Israel Ministry of Defence signs order for Iron Dome production – Army Technology, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.army-technology.com/news/israel-iron-dome-defence/
12. Pro-Israel shoes are custom design, not official Nike product – CEDMO, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://cedmohub.eu/pro-israel-shoes-are-custom-design-not-official-nike-product/
13. Nike to end sales in Israeli shops – Middle East Monitor, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20211006-nike-to-end-sales-in-israeli-shops/
14. Nike Tells Israeli Retailers: No More Business in 2022 – Palestine Chronicle, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.palestinechronicle.com/nike-tells-israeli-retailers-no-more-business-in-2022/
15. Nike isn’t boycotting Israel — despite reports to the contrary – The Forward, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://forward.com/news/476428/nike-isnt-boycotting-israel-despite-reports-to-the-contrary/
16. Nike to end some sales in Israeli stores | The Independent, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/nike-israel-stores-end-sales-b1934096.html
17. Nike to stop sales in retail stores across Israel – Al Arabiya, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2021/10/07/Nike-to-stop-sales-in-retail-stores-across-Israel
18. After backlash over dividends, Fox says it will forfeit millions in state aid | The Times of Israel, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/after-backlash-over-dividends-fox-says-it-will-forfeit-millions-in-state-aid/
19. ‘Swinish capitalism’: Fox, which got millions in virus aid, pays huge dividends, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/swinish-capitalism-fox-which-got-millions-in-virus-aid-pays-huge-dividends/
20. Israeli opposition calls for mass protests after Benjamin Netanyahu fires Yoav Gallant | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-827721
21. Israel’s finance minister threatened businesses against joining protests | The Jerusalem Post, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-750310
22. PURPLE FOX FOUNDATION, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.purplefoxfoundation.org/
23. Shopping (Dream Card Gift Card) – Best in Judea and Samaria | easy, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Shopping?region=6&c2=22117
24. Nike Stock: Analyzing 5 Key Suppliers (NKE) – Investopedia, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/051416/nike-stock-analyzing-5-key-suppliers-nke.asp
25. AR 670-1 Army Boots | U.S. Army, National Guard & Reserve – CombatFootwear.com, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.combatfootwear.com/collections/ar-670-1-compliant-military-boots
26. Nike SFB B2 Tactical Boots, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://www.nike.com/t/sfb-b2-tactical-boots-9SCZXk
27. REVIEW: Nike SFB Field 8″ Boots – SPARTANAT.com, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://spartanat.com/en/review-nike-sfb-field-8-boots
28. Nike has not customised trainers to feature the Israeli flag – Full Fact, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://fullfact.org/online/trainers-nike-israel-flag-artist-customised/
29. Foot Locker – Closest in Tel Aviv area | easy, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Foot-Locker?region=7
30. Women’s Shoes (Parking Lot Nearby, Hever Sheli, Your Club For Pensioner, Rami Levi Giftcard) – Best in Tel Aviv, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://easy.co.il/en/list/Women’s-Shoes?c2=30561&c3=31434&c4=31433®ion=1955&c5=22136
31. שאלות ותשובות – Foot Locker, accessed on December 7, 2025, https://footlocker.co.il/pages/contact