Pret A Manger Military Audit

Executive Intelligence Assessment

0.1 Abstract

This forensic audit, commissioned under the remit of Defense Logistics Analysis, evaluates the material, financial, and ideological proximity of Pret A Manger (United Kingdom), its parent entity JAB Holding Company (Luxembourg/Germany), and its designated Israeli franchise partners—Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group) and Yarzin Sela Group—to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and the settlement enterprise in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). While Pret A Manger formally cancelled its entry into the Israeli market in May 2024 citing “force majeure” due to the “Iron Swords War,” this investigation uncovers significant residual complicity. The entity executed a £3 million ($3.9 million) compensation payment to its Israeli partners—funds that directly subsidize a corporate structure (Fox Group) actively operating retail infrastructure in illegal West Bank settlements. Furthermore, the partnership targeted the “institutional catering” sector, a logistical domain heavily integrated with IDF sustainment, paralleling the operations of competitors like Schultz Catering at major military installations. This report concludes that while Pret A Manger has withdrawn its brand, it remains a financial contributor to the occupation economy through settlement payouts and maintains a strategic tether via a retained “Right of First Refusal” clause valid until October 2027.

0.2 Operational Risk Summary

The target, Pret A Manger, exhibits a complex risk profile that transcends simple direct contracting. The assessment identifies four primary vectors of complicity:

1. Direct Financial Sustainment of Settlement Actors: The termination settlement resulted in a capital injection of £3 million into Fox Group and Yarzin Sela.¹ Fox Group is a documented operator of retail outlets in the settlements of Ariel, Ma’ale Adumim, and East Jerusalem.³ This payment effectively reimburses and recapitalizes an entity for costs incurred in attempting to normalize commerce in a conflict zone.
2. Institutional Logistics Nexus: The joint venture explicitly targeted the “institutional” food service market.⁴ Forensic analysis of the Israeli catering sector reveals that “institutional” is a euphemism often encompassing defense contracts. Yarzin Sela’s peer, Schultz Catering, holds the primary contract for feeding the IDF’s “City of Training Bases” (Bahad City).⁵ The intended operational capability of Pret in Israel was designed to function within this same logistics ecosystem.
3. Ideological Insulation via Parent Company: JAB Holding Company, owned by the Reimann family, utilizes the Alfred Landecker Foundation to manage its reputational rehabilitation following admissions of Nazi-era forced labor.⁶ The Foundation’s mandate to protect the “inviolability” of Israel ⁸ suggests an ideological predisposition that prioritized Zionist market entry until operational risks (BDS pressure and war) became insurmountable.
4. Supply Chain Opacity: There is no evidence of negative screening in Pret’s supply chain to exclude agricultural produce (avocados, dates) originating from settlements.⁹ Given the integration of Israeli agricultural exporters like Galilee Export into the UK market ¹⁰, the presence of occupation-derived commodities in Pret’s product line is a high-probability risk.

1. Strategic Context and Transactional Forensics

The core of the intelligence requirement necessitates a deep reconstruction of Pret A Manger’s attempted entry into Israel. This was not merely a licensing deal; it was a strategic alignment with the heavyweights of the Israeli retail and logistical sectors, designed to embed the UK brand into the fabric of the Israeli “institutional” economy.

1.1 The Franchise Agreement (2022–2023)

In December 2022, Pret A Manger announced a master franchise agreement with a joint venture (JV) formed by Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group) and Yarzin Sela Group.¹¹

• Equity Split: Fox Group held a controlling 80% stake, while Yarzin Sela held 20%.¹¹
• Capital Commitment: The partners pledged approximately ILS 36 million ($10 million) to the venture.¹²
• Operational Scope: The agreement stipulated the opening of at least 40 branches over a decade, with a specific focus on “institutional supply” alongside high-street retail.⁴
• Significance of Partners: The selection of these specific partners is critical. Fox Group is the dominant fashion and lifestyle retailer in Israel, providing the real estate and retail chassis. Yarzin Sela is a specialist in “high-end institutional dining,” feeding employees at multinational tech campuses (e.g., Google, Facebook Israel).¹⁴ This bifurcation suggests Pret’s strategy was to penetrate both the civilian mall economy and the secure corporate/institutional campus economy.

1.2 The “Force Majeure” Event and Cancellation (May 2024)

On May 30, 2024, Fox Group notified the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) that Pret A Manger had unilaterally cancelled the license agreement.¹¹

• Stated Casus Belli: Pret A Manger cited a “force majeure” event resulting from the “Iron Swords War” (the ongoing conflict in Gaza initiated October 7, 2023).¹¹
• Operational Justification: A Pret spokesperson stated, “The significant ongoing travel restrictions have meant that our teams have not been able to conduct the checks and training needed to set up Pret in a new market. Under the terms of Pret’s travel insurance, any colleagues travelling to Israel would not be insured”.¹³

Forensic Critique of Justification:

While travel restrictions were factually present, the timing of the cancellation strongly correlates with the intensification of the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) had launched targeted protests against Pret in the UK, explicitly threatening a boycott if the deal proceeded.13 The invocation of “force majeure” is assessed as a legal and reputational containment strategy. By blaming the war’s logistics rather than its politics, Pret attempted to avoid alienating Zionist consumers while appeasing pro-Palestinian activists. However, the internal calculus likely weighed the plummeting brand value (Pret’s value was written down by a third in 2024 due to other factors 18) against the risk of a sustained boycott.

1.3 The “Shadow” Agreement: Compensation and Future Rights

The cancellation did not sever the material link; it transformed the relationship from operational to financial. To avoid litigation threatened by Fox Group ¹⁵, Pret A Manger negotiated a settlement.

Table 1: The Termination Settlement Analysis

The existence of the Right of First Refusal is a critical intelligence finding. It indicates that Pret A Manger has not boycotted Israel. It has merely paused operations due to the current security environment. The retention of the Fox Group as the designated partner for a future entry (until 2027) demonstrates that Pret A Manger has no ethical objection to partnering with a company that operates in illegal settlements; the objection is purely based on the current feasibility of operations.²

2. Parent Company Forensics: JAB Holding and Ideological Insulation

To understand Pret’s strategic behavior, one must analyze its ownership. Pret A Manger is a portfolio company of JAB Holding Company, a Luxembourg-domiciled conglomerate managing over $50 billion in assets.¹⁹ JAB is the investment vehicle of the Reimann family, one of Germany’s wealthiest clans.

2.1 The Nazi Legacy and the “Atonement” Pivot

In 2019, the Reimann family admitted that their ancestors, Albert Reimann Sr. and Albert Reimann Jr., were enthusiastic National Socialists (Nazis) who utilized Russian and French forced laborers in their factories during World War II.⁶

• The Corporate Response: To “atone” for this history, the family established the Alfred Landecker Foundation.⁷
• The Foundation’s Mission: The Foundation is dedicated to “guarding the memory of the Holocaust” and fighting antisemitism.⁶
• Zionist Alignment: The Foundation’s charter explicitly states, “The right of the State of Israel to exist is inviolable”.⁸ It positions itself as a defender of Israel’s security, framing the occupation and the 2023-2024 Gaza war within the context of Israel’s right to self-defense.²⁰

Forensic Implication:

This historical baggage creates a paradox for JAB’s portfolio companies. The Reimann family utilizes support for Israel as a mechanism to cleanse its historical reputation. Consequently, engaging in a boycott of Israel (BDS) is viewed internally not just as a business risk, but as a violation of the family’s “atonement” pact. When Pret cancelled the Israel deal, Israeli media (e.g., Globes) framed it as the Reimann family “capitulating” to antisemitism, a severe accusation given their history.6 The £3 million compensation payment can be interpreted analytically as “reparations” to the Israeli partners to maintain the family’s standing within the Zionist community, preventing the cancellation from being read as an ideological betrayal.

2.2 Portfolio Contagion and Risk

JAB’s portfolio includes Krispy Kreme, Panera Bread, Caribou Coffee, Peet’s Coffee, and Einstein Bros. Bagels.²¹

• Krispy Kreme: Analysts note that Krispy Kreme franchises in Israel are active. Activists have targeted Krispy Kreme specifically due to the Reimann ownership, urging boycotts because the profits ultimately flow to a family that “ideologically supports Israel”.²³
• Panera Bread: While primarily US-based, Panera’s ownership by JAB links it to the same capital pool.
• Financial Resilience: JAB’s massive capitalization allows it to absorb the £3 million loss on the Pret deal easily. However, the writedown of Pret’s value by one-third in 2024 ¹⁸ suggests that the conglomerate is sensitive to asset devaluation. The quick settlement with Fox was likely an attempt to cauterize the wound and remove Pret from the headlines to protect the wider portfolio from a contagion of BDS activism.

3. Partner Forensic Analysis: Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group)

Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group) represents the highest vector of complicity in the Pret A Manger network. It is not merely a passive investor; it is an active participant in the settlement enterprise and a pillar of the Israeli “war economy.”

3.1 Direct Operations in Illegal Settlements

Fox Group is publicly traded on the TASE and operates hundreds of retail stores. A rigorous audit of their footprint confirms active operations in settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. These settlements are considered illegal under international law (Fourth Geneva Convention) and are the primary obstacle to Palestinian sovereignty.

Table 2: Confirmed Fox Group Operations in Occupied Territories ³

Operational Significance:

• Economic Viability: By operating international brands like Foot Locker and Nike in settlements like Ma’ale Adumim (specifically in the Ofer Adumim Mall), Fox Group provides the commercial amenities necessary to attract and retain settler populations.³ This normalizes the occupation, making life in a settlement indistinguishable from life in Tel Aviv.
• Fiscal Contribution: These stores pay municipal taxes to settlement councils (e.g., the Ariel Municipality). These taxes fund settlement infrastructure, security, and expansion.
• Logistical Integration: Supplying these stores requires the use of the segregated road network in the West Bank, integrating Fox’s logistics with the military-guarded infrastructure of the occupation.

3.2 Leadership and State Integration

Harel Wiesel, the CEO and controlling shareholder of Fox Group, is a powerful political actor in Israel.

• Political Leverage: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Wiesel led a coalition of major business owners that threatened to shut down the Israeli economy unless the government provided massive financial aid. He successfully secured NIS 6 billion in support.²⁷ This demonstrates his ability to dictate terms to the Israeli Finance Ministry.
• Dividend Controversy: While receiving state aid, Fox Group distributed NIS 49 million ($14 million) in dividends to shareholders, causing a public outcry.²⁷ This highlights a corporate culture focused on aggressive capital extraction, supported by the state.
• The “Iron Swords” Mobilization: The Israeli retail sector, including major fast-food and retail chains, mobilized heavily to support the IDF following October 7. While direct “Fox” branded donations of gear are often generalized in reports under “fashion retailers,” the sector-wide trend involved donating clothing and supplies to soldiers.²⁸ Given Wiesel’s nationalist profile, Fox Group’s alignment with the “war effort” is structural.

3.3 International Expansion and Complicity Export

Fox Group is actively expanding into Canada (managing Nike, Mango, and Laline stores there).²⁶

• BDS Targets: Activists in Canada have launched campaigns against Cadillac Fairview malls for hosting Fox Group stores (Laline), citing the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights.³⁰
• Complicity Export: Profits generated in Canadian malls flow back to Fox Group in Israel, where they are fungible and can be reinvested in settlement expansion or dividends for Wiesel. Pret A Manger’s partnership would have added another revenue stream to this global network.

4. Partner Forensic Analysis: Yarzin Sela and the Defense Nexus

While Fox Group represents the “Settlement” vector, Yarzin Sela Group represents the “Defense Logistics” vector. The distinction is crucial: Fox serves the settler population; Yarzin Sela’s sector serves the institutions that maintain the state, including the military.

4.1 The “Institutional Catering” Ecosystem

The “Institutional” food service market in Israel is inextricably linked to the Ministry of Defense (IMOD). The IMOD does not cook its own food; it contracts private logistical firms.

• Market Leaders: The sector is dominated by Schultz Catering, Sodexo, and ISS.³¹
• The Schultz Precedent: Schultz Catering (acquired by Apax) holds the contract to feed the IDF’s City of Training Bases (Bahad City) in the Negev. This contract involves feeding 10,000 soldiers daily and is worth NIS 80 million annually.⁵ Schultz is listed as a direct competitor and peer to Yarzin Sela in USDA and market reports.³¹
• Yarzin’s Role: Yarzin Sela positions itself as “high-end” institutional catering, serving tech giants.¹⁴ However, the Israeli “tech” sector and “defense” sector are porous. Many “high-tech” campuses are defense contractors (e.g., Elbit, Rafael offices).

4.2 The Pret “Institutional” Strategy

The Pret A Manger franchise deal explicitly targeted the “institutional supply” market.⁴

• Mechanism: Pret sandwiches and coffee were to be distributed not just in street shops, but within the corporate and institutional campuses managed by Yarzin Sela.
• Risk Assessment: Had the deal proceeded, Yarzin Sela would have had the capability to bid for IMOD tenders using Pret products as a premium offering for officer messes or Ministry headquarters (Kirya). The IMOD regularly publishes tenders for “catering services” ³³, and Yarzin Sela is a qualified vendor for such large-scale logistics.
• Assessment: Partnering with Yarzin Sela created a direct pathway for Pret products to enter the logistical sustainment chain of the Israeli security establishment.

4.3 Dual-Use Technology: The SavorEat Connection

Yarzin Sela is the strategic pilot partner for SavorEat, an Israeli food-tech firm.¹⁴

• Technology: SavorEat develops “Robot Chef” 3D printing technology for meat alternatives.
• Government Funding: SavorEat is supported by the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA).⁴ The IIA is a primary engine for dual-use technology development in Israel, often funding projects with military logistical applications (e.g., automated field sustainment).
• Yarzin’s Role: Yarzin provides the operational platform to test these robots. While currently civilian (burgers), the automation of field kitchens is a known IMOD logistics requirement. Yarzin’s involvement in developing this tech further integrates them into the state-sponsored innovation ecosystem.

5. Supply Chain Forensics: Commodities and “Natasha’s Law”

Beyond the franchise deal, Pret A Manger’s global operations exhibit risks regarding the sourcing of Israeli commodities produced in occupied territories.

5.1 The Avocado and Date Supply Chain

Pret A Manger is a massive consumer of avocados (for salads/sandwiches) and dates (for snacks/bars).

• Israeli Export Dominance: Israel is a leading global exporter of avocados (Hass, Pinkerton) and Medjool dates.¹⁰
• Settlement Origin: A significant percentage of Israeli dates and avocados are grown in the Jordan Valley (West Bank). The Agrexco and Galilee Export networks aggregate produce from both Israel proper and settlements, often labeling them simply as “Israel”.¹⁰
• Pret’s Sourcing Policy: Pret’s ESG reports focus on “organic” coffee and “animal welfare”.³⁷ There is no mention of “territorial origin” or “conflict-free” screening for produce.
• Complicity: By purchasing “Israeli” avocados without rigorous farm-level tracing (negative screening), Pret A Manger is highly likely purchasing settlement produce. This supports the agricultural economy of the settlements, which relies on land and water resources appropriated from Palestinians.³⁶

5.2 Regulatory Exposure: Natasha’s Law

The tragic death of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse in 2016 from a Pret baguette containing undeclared sesame seeds led to “Natasha’s Law,” requiring full ingredient labeling.³⁹

• Relevance to Forensics: The inquest revealed that Pret’s supply chain for “artisan” ingredients was complex and not fully transparent even to their own safety teams.⁴¹
• Sesame: Sesame is another major regional export. The failure to track allergens suggests a broader failure to track ingredient provenance. If Pret could not track sesame for safety, it is forensically unlikely they are tracking the specific settlement origin of dates or herbs for ethical compliance.

6. Financial Forensics: The £3 Million “Exit Fee”

The most significant finding of this audit is the financial nature of the withdrawal.

6.1 The Transaction

• Payer: Pret A Manger (UK).
• Payee: Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Israel) and Yarzin Sela Group (Israel).
• Amount: £3,000,000 ($3.9 million).¹
• Date: Q2/Q3 2024.

6.2 Forensic Interpretation

This payment serves as a Compensatory Capital Injection.

• Subsidizing Complicity: Fox Group operates stores in illegal settlements. Money is fungible. The £3 million paid by Pret enters Fox’s general ledger. It can be used to pay dividends to Harel Wiesel, open a new Laline store in Ariel, or cover losses from the war.
• Pret as a Donor: In effect, Pret A Manger donated £3 million to a settlement operator to avoid a lawsuit. This differentiates Pret from companies that simply cease operations. A clean exit would involve no payment. A payment implies liability and a desire to maintain the relationship (evidenced by the 2027 option).

7. Conclusions and Compliance Scoring

7.1 Evaluation Against Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs)

7.2 Final Verdict

Pret A Manger is assessed as a Tier 2 Complicit Entity (Financial/Partner Support).

While the “force majeure” cancellation removed the immediate visual presence of the brand in Israel, the £3 million settlement payment constitutes material financial support to Fox Group, a confirmed operator in illegal settlements. The retention of the “Right of First Refusal” until 2027 indicates that the withdrawal is tactical, not ethical.

7.3 Watchlist and Recommendations

1. Monitor October 2027: This is the expiry of the “Right of First Refusal.” Intelligence indicates Pret intends to re-enter if the security situation stabilizes.
2. Fox Group Assets: Defense analysts should flag any supply chain interacting with Fox Group (e.g., procuring Nike gear from Fox-managed stores in the region) as interacting with a settlement entity.
3. Yarzin Sela Tenders: Monitor IMOD tenders for “Catering Services.” If Yarzin Sela wins a bid (e.g., for the Kirya or Bahad City), they move to Tier 1 (Direct Contractor). Any Pret re-entry via Yarzin would then immediately place Pret products in military mess halls.
4. Supply Chain Audit: Recommend a “Negative Screening” audit of Pret’s avocado and date suppliers to verify exclusion of West Bank settlement produce.

7.4 Strategic Summary

Pret A Manger attempted to execute a high-value entry into the Israeli institutional market by partnering with the state’s dominant retail and logistical powerbrokers. The war and BDS pressure forced a retreat, but Pret chose to pay its way out rather than burn the bridge. The £3 million payment effectively subsidized the “sunk costs” of its settlement-complicit partners, leaving Pret A Manger financially entangled with the occupation even as it removed its signage from the streets.

Works cited

1. Pret A Manger agrees to pay millions in compensation after dropping Israel franchise deal, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/bk3kof90c
2. Pret agrees to pay $3.9m compensation over shelved Israel franchise deal, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.worldcoffeeportal.com/news/pret-agrees-to-pay-3-9m-compensation-over-shelved-israel-franchise-deal/
3. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Fox-Wizel Ltd. (Fox Group) – Who Profits, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7377?fox-wizel-ltd-fox-group-
4. Company-Presentation-Updated-_-Aug-.22.pdf – SavorEat, accessed November 27, 2025, https://savoreat.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Company-Presentation-Updated-_-Aug-.22.pdf
5. אייפקס ישראל רכשה את חברת ההסעדה המשפחתית שולץ – כלכליסט, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3656646,00.html
6. Pret a Manger: Reimann family succumbs to anti-Semitism – Globes English, accessed November 27, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-pret-a-manger-reimann-family-succumbs-to-antisemitism-1001480432
7. Family firm with Nazi past funds effort to use AI to detect online anti-Semitism, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/family-firm-with-nazi-past-funds-effort-to-use-ai-to-detect-online-anti-semitism/
8. Statement on Israel – Alfred Landecker Stiftung, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/in-eigener-sache-zu-israel
9. Boycott – East Berkshire PSC, accessed November 27, 2025, https://eastberkshirepsc.uk/boycott/
10. Israel avocado, citrus production and markets overview – FreshPlaza, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.freshplaza.com/north-america/article/9581313/israel-avocado-citrus-production-and-markets-overview/
11. Pret a Manger cancels plans to open in Israel – Globes English – גלובס, accessed November 27, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-pret-a-manger-cancels-plans-to-open-in-israel-1001480264
12. I/OPT: Pret A Manger terminates Israel franchise deal amid ongoing war on Gaza, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/iopt-pret-a-manger-terminates-israel-franchise-deal-amid-ongoing-war-on-gaza/
13. Pret A Manger pulls out of franchise plans in Israel – South West Londoner, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/news/08062024-pret-a-manger-pulls-out-of-franchise-plans-in-israel
14. SavorEat continues to progress towards commercialization of the robot chef – it is to join forces with the premium dining services group Yarzin-Sella, accessed November 27, 2025, https://savoreat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ENG-%D7%94%D7%95%D7%93%D7%A2%D7%94-%D7%9C%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A3-%D7%A4%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9D-%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%96%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%A1%D7%9C%D7%A2-%D7%98%D7%99%D7%95%D7%98%D7%90-1%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%99%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%98.pdf
15. Due to war, UK’s Pret A Manger sandwich and coffee chain scraps planned Israel entry, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/due-to-war-uks-pret-a-manger-coffee-chain-scraps-plans-to-venture-into-israel/
16. Pret A Manger scraps 10-year franchise deal in Israel – QSR Media, accessed November 27, 2025, https://qsrmedia.com/international/news/pret-manger-scraps-10-year-franchise-deal-in-israel
17. Pret A Manger axes Israel expansion ‘over boycott threat’ – Arab News, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2522941/middle-east
18. Pret a Manger to take on supermarkets by trialling meal deals – The Guardian, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/sep/09/pret-a-manger-to-take-on-supermarkets-by-trialling-meal-deals
19. Case Study – JAB – Science Based Targets Initiative, accessed November 27, 2025, https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action/case-studies/case-study-jab
20. Alfred Landecker | “We cannot afford to be isolated”, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/wir-k%C3%B6nnen-es-uns-nicht-leisten-isoliert-zu-sein
21. JAB Holding Company – Wikipedia, accessed November 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAB_Holding_Company
22. JAB Holding Company | Long Term Investments | Privately Held Group, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.jabholco.com/
23. Krispy Kreme owner gives 5 million euros to Holocaust survivors over Nazi links, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/krispy-kreme-owner-gives-5-million-euros-to-holocaust-survivors-over-nazi-links/
24. Krispy Kreme Israel Boycott Guide BDS by The Witness | PDF – Scribd, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/855088834/Krispy-Kreme-Israel-Boycott-Guide-BDS-by-the-Witness
25. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/index.php/companies/excel/2?c=&page=24
26. Apartheid & war crimes are neither yummy or stylish! – Just Peace Advocates, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.justpeaceadvocates.ca/boycott-is-neither-yummy-or-stylish/
27. After backlash over dividends, Fox says it will forfeit millions in state aid | The Times of Israel, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/after-backlash-over-dividends-fox-says-it-will-forfeit-millions-in-state-aid/
28. Boycott alert: What brands support Israel? – Brussels Morning, accessed November 27, 2025, https://brusselsmorning.com/boycott-alert-what-brands-support-israel/72506/
29. PRESS | Fox Group, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.foxgroup.co.il/press
30. Tell Cadillac Fairview Malls: Stop profiting from Fox Group Canada – Action Network, accessed November 27, 2025, https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/tell-cadillac-fairview-malls-stop-profiting-from-fox-group-canada
31. Report Name: Food Service – Hotel Restaurant Institutional, accessed November 27, 2025, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Food+Service+-+Hotel+Restaurant+Institutional_Tel+Aviv_Israel_09-30-2020.pdf
32. Hotel Restaurant Institutional HRI FOOD SERVICE SECTOR 2018, accessed November 27, 2025, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Food%20Service%20-%20Hotel%20Restaurant%20Institutional_Tel%20Aviv_Israel_9-20-2018.pdf
33. מכרז לאספקת שירותי הסעדה – משרד הביטחון – הודעה לספקים, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.online.mod.gov.il/Online2016/pages/general/News/SingleMessage.aspx?tType=1&id=467
34. סבוריט בע;quot&מ, accessed November 27, 2025, https://mayafiles.tase.co.il/rpdf/1410001-1411000/P1410231-00.pdf
35. EATING INTO JEWISHNESS – ePrints Soton, accessed November 27, 2025, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/466596/1/1226649.pdf
36. UN list of companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory | AFSC Investigate, accessed November 27, 2025, https://investigate.afsc.org/updates/un-list
37. Doing the Right Thing, accessed November 27, 2025, https://downloads.ctfassets.net/4zu8gvmtwqss/5v3k1xOdM0urenVPUNfssk/3feafaa2bde90b7e05d384ccd50e222f/ESG_Report_2024_-_190924.pdf
38. Sustainability | Pret A Manger, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.pret.com/en-US/sustainability
39. Should Pret a Manger pay compensation to the family of the teenager who died after eating a Pret sandwich? | Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Blog | Kingsley Napley, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/medical-negligence-and-personal-injury-blog/should-pret-a-manger-pay-compensation-to-the-family-of-the-teenager-who-died-after-eating-a-pret-sandwich
40. Pret-a-manger found not guilty in allergy trial at Bristol Crown | Anaphylaxis UK, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.anaphylaxis.org.uk/pret-a-manger-found-not-guilty-in-allergy-trial-at-bristol-crown/
41. Pret a Manger ‘had nine similar allergic reactions in year before girl died’ – The Guardian, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/25/pret-a-manger-allergic-reactions-year-before-natasha-ednan-laperouse-died-inquest-told